Immunogenicity of Constrained Monoclonal Antibody A32-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Env gp120 Complexes Compared to That of Recombinant HIV ...

Page created by Alex Hodges
 
CONTINUE READING
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, May 2004, p. 5270–5278                                                                                               Vol. 78, No. 10
0022-538X/04/$08.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5270–5278.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

    Immunogenicity of Constrained Monoclonal Antibody A32-Human
   Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Env gp120 Complexes Compared to
     That of Recombinant HIV Type 1 gp120 Envelope Glycoproteins
           Hua-Xin Liao,1* S. Munir Alam,1 John R. Mascola,2 James Robinson,3 Benjiang Ma,1
              David C. Montefiori,4 Maria Rhein,1 Laura L. Sutherland,1 Richard Scearce,1
                                        and Barton F. Haynes1
       Duke Human Vaccine Institute and Department of Medicine1 and Department of Surgery,4 Duke University School of
         Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710; Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
            Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 208922; and Department of Pediatrics, Tulane
                                 University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 701123

                                                                                                                                                               Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
                                         Received 29 September 2003/Accepted 16 January 2004

            One strategy for the generation of broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies (NA) against human immuno-
         deficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) primary isolates is to use immunogens that have constrained HIV-1 envelope
         gp120 conformations reflective of triggered envelope on the surface of virions. A major change in gp120
         following binding to CD4 is the enhanced exposure of the CCR5 binding site. One inducer of CCR5 binding site
         epitopes on gp120 is the human anti-gp120 monoclonal antibody, A32. We have made cross-linked A32-
         rgp12089.6 and A32-rgp120BaL complexes and have compared their immunogenicities to those of uncomplexed
         recombinant gp120BaL (rgp120BaL) and rgp12089.6. A32-rgp12089.6 and A32-rgp120BaL complexes had stable
         induced CCR5 binding site expression compared to that of uncomplexed rgp120s. However, the A32-rgp120
         complexes had similar capacities in guinea pigs for induction of NA against HIV-1 primary isolates versus that
         of rgp120 alone. A32-rgp12089.6 induced antibodies that neutralized 6 out of 11 HIV-1 isolates, while rgp12089.6
         alone induced antibodies that neutralized 4 out of 11 HIV-1 isolates. A32-rgp120BaL complexes induced
         antibodies that neutralized 4 out of 14 HIV-1 isolates while, surprisingly, non-cross-linked rgp120BaL induced
         antibodies that neutralized 9 out of 14 (64%) HIV-1 isolates. Thus, stable enhanced expression of the core-
         ceptor binding site on constrained gp120 is not sufficient for inducing broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 NA.
         Moreover, the ability of HIV-1 rgp120BaL to induce antibodies that neutralized ⬃60% of subtype B HIV-1
         isolates warrants consideration of using HIV-1 BaL as a starting point for immunogen design for subtype B
         HIV-1 experimental immunogens.

   The design of immunogens that will neutralize a broad spec-             does not bind at the CD4 binding site (26). Thus, MAb A32 has
trum of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pri-                   a potential advantage over CD4 in a constrained Env complex
mary isolates is a high priority for development of a practical            in that A32-rgp120 complexes have exposed CD4 binding sites.
HIV-1 vaccine. Following binding of virion gp120 to cellular               Here we show that both A32-rgp12089.6 and A32-rgp120BaL
CD4, the HIV-1 envelope undergoes conformational changes                   complexes are immunogenic and induce NA against HIV-1
that result in exposure of the coreceptor binding site leading to          primary isolates. However, stable expression of the CCR5
virion-host cell fusion (1, 24).                                           binding site on gp120 was not sufficient for induction of broad
   One potential strategy for inducing broadly reactive neutral-           NA, as A32-rgp120 complexes did not show marked enhanced
izing antibodies (NA) is to construct immunogens that are                  immunogenicity for NA induction over uncomplexed rgp120s.
constrained and reflect wild-type fusion intermediate Env                  Surprisingly, we found that monomeric recombinant gp120BaL
forms, with the hope of stably exposing conserved immuno-                  (rgp120BaL) was the best immunogen tested and induced NA
genic epitopes that otherwise would not be readily available for           to 64% (9 out of 14) of HIV-1 isolates tested.
antibody induction. An alternative strategy for selection of Env
immunogens is to select the best envelopes from among many
                                                                                                   MATERIALS AND METHODS
screened for their ability to induce antibodies that broadly
                                                                              HIV-1 gp120 proteins. Recombinant vaccinia viruses (rVVs) that express
neutralize HIV-1 primary isolates.
                                                                           HIV-1 (subtype B) 89.6 gp120 (VBD-2) and HIV-1IIIB (VPE-50) were obtained
   In this work we describe the immunogenicity of recombinant              from Pat Earl and Bernard Moss (National Institutes of Health [NIH], Bethesda,
HIV-1 gp120s complexed with the CD4 mimic, monoclonal                      Md.) (19). rVV that expresses group M consensus (CON6) rgp120 (11) was
antibody (MAb) A32. Like CD4, MAb A32 induces expression                   generated as described previously (19). Briefly, a DNA fragment encoding CON6
of the CCR5 binding site on rgp120, but unlike CD4, MAb A32                gp120 was produced by introducing stop codons after the gp120 cleavage site
                                                                           (REKR) by PCR and was cloned into a transfer vector, pSC65 vector (from
                                                                           Bernard Moss) at SalI and KpnI restriction enzyme sites (3). BSC-1 cells were
                                                                           seeded at 2 ⫻ 105 in each well in a 6-well plate and were infected with wild-type
  * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Box 3258 Human Vaccine          vaccinia virus (WR) at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 PFU/cell, and 2 h after
Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.               infection pSC65-derived plasmids containing CON6 env genes were transfected
Phone: (919) 684-5858. Fax: (919) 681-8992. E-mail: liao0001@mc            into the VV-infected cells by using Lipofectamine 2000 based on the protocol
.duke.edu.                                                                 recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). rVV that ex-

                                                                    5270
VOL. 78, 2004                                                                        CONSTRAINED MAb A32-HIV Env gp120 COMPLEXES                               5271

                                                                                                                                                                        Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
  FIG. 1. Reactivity of HIV-1 MAb A32 with HIV-1 rgp12089.6 and rgp120BaL proteins in Biacore assays. MAb A32 was covalently immobilized
to a CM5 sensor chip (Biacore), and rgp12089.6 (A) and rgp120BaL (B) proteins were injected over each surface. Overlay of curves of Biacore
analysis shows that anti-HIV MAb A32 (solid line) reacted with both rgp12089.6 (A) and rgp120BaL (B) proteins. Curves in dotted lines represent
background binding to an irrelevant IgG. To determine induction of 17b MAb binding to rgp12089.6 (C) and rgp120BaL (D), HIV-1 rgp12089.6
(C) and HIV-1 rgp120BaL (D) proteins were flowed over 17b MAb, which was immobilized on a Biacore chip and was tested for the ability to bind
HIV-1 MAb 17b in the presence or absence of MAb A32 whole IgG or Fab fragment. The x axis shows the duration of time (in seconds), and the
y axis shows the response unit of MAb 17b binding in the Biacore assay. HIV-1 rgp12089.6 constitutively bound MAb 17b (C), indicating the
availability of the CCR5 binding site, while rgp120BaL did not bind to MAb 17b (D). Both whole IgG and Fab fragment of MAb A32 markedly
upregulated (for rgp12089.6) (C) or induced (for rgp120BaL) (D) MAb 17b binding.

presses the CON6 env gene was selected and confirmed by PCR and sequencing            under reducing and nonreducing conditions by Coomassie staining, Western blot
analysis as described previously (19). HIV-1 rgp12089.6, HIV-1 rgp120IIIB, and        analysis, and Biacore binding assay. Western blots were developed with a satu-
CON6 rgp120 were expressed in 293T cells infected with VBD-2, VPE-50, and             rating concentration of HIV-1 envelope protein-specific MAb T8 that reacts with
CON6 gp120 rVV, respectively. Serum-free tissue culture supernatants of 293T          most subtype B gp120s at the C1 region (gift of P. Earl) to detect rgp120, and
cells were harvested 3 days after infection with rVVs as a source for purification    anti-human immunoglobulin (Ig) (1:4,000; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) to detect MAb
of rgp120 proteins. rgp120 proteins in the supernatants were all purified by          A32. Surface plasmon resonance binding assays were performed on a Biacore
agarose Galanthus nivalis lectin chromatography (Vector Labs, Burlingame,             3000 (Uppsala, Sweden). Monoclonal antibodies (17b, T8 A32) were immobi-
Calif.) and were stored at ⫺70°C until use. Purified rgp120 proteins were quality     lized on a CM5 sensor chip by using standard amine coupling chemistry.
controlled with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-          Immunization regimens and adjuvants. Outbred Hartley guinea pigs were
PAGE) followed by Coomassie staining and Western blot. rgp120 proteins of             immunized with either 100 ␮g of rgp120 or 200 ␮g of rgp120-A32 complexes in
HIV-1 isolates of BaL (subtype B), 96ZM651 (subtype C), and JRFL (subtype B)          either CFA/IFA (Sigma), Ribi-CWS Adjuvant (Corixa-Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), or
were obtained from QBI Inc., Bethesda, Md., through the NIH AIDS Reagent              RC529-SE⫹ mutant cholera toxin (CT) subcutaneously (the gifts of John El-
Repository Program.                                                                   dridge; Wyeth, Pearl River, N.Y.) every 3 weeks for five immunizations. Serum
   Cross-linking of MAb A32 and rgp120. HIV-1 rgp2089.6 or rgp120BaL was              samples were collected 10 days after each immunization and were stored at
chemically cross-linked to MAb A32 by using the water soluble N-hydroxysuc-           ⫺30°C until use in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutral-
cinimide-ester dithiobis-sulfosuccinimidylporpionate (DTSSP) (Pierce, Rock-           ization assays.
ford, Ill.) based on the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly,              Neutralization assays. HIV-1 isolates (ADA, JRCSF, JRFL, BaL, SF162, and
MAb A32 was mixed with a final concentration of 1 mg of rgp120/ml and was             89.6) were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent
incubated at 4°C for 2 h in a 2.25-fold molar excess over MAb A32 to ensure           Program (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Dis-
saturation of the bivalent MAb and to have only excess rgp120 following cross-        eases). The viruses were expanded by two or three cycles of growth on phyto-
linking. DTSSP was added to the mixture at either 100-fold molar excess for           hemagglutinin and interleukin-2-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell
rgp12089.6 or 200-fold molar excess for rgp120BaL at 0°C for 2 h. The reaction was    (PBMC). Viruses BL01 and BR07 were provided by Dana Gabuzda of the
stopped by adding 1 M Tris at a final concentration of 50 mM and was further          Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Both are chimeric infectious molecular clones of
incubated at 20°C for 30 min.                                                         NL4-3 that contain the full-length env genes from primary HIV-1 isolates (20).
   Cross-linked A32-rgp120 complexes were separated from uncomplexed gp120            After initial plasmid transfection of 293 cells, these viruses were expanded in
proteins by size exclusion chromatography over a HR200 Superdex column and            PBMC as described above.
by using an AKTA fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) system (Uppsala,              Serum NA levels were measured either by flow cytometic enumeration of p24
Sweden). Fractions were analyzed on 4 to 20% Tris-Glycine gels (Invitrogen)           antigen-positive cells following a single round of infection (16) or by using a
5272       LIAO ET AL.                                                                                                                                      J. VIROL.

                                                                                     assay) of AT-2-inactivated HIV-ADA or ADA (from Larry Arthur) for 1 h at
                                                                                     37°C. After 1 h of incubation the mixtures of serum and virus were incubated
                                                                                     with Sup T1 cells (100,000 cells per well of 96-well half-area microtiter plates)
                                                                                     overnight in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator. The presence of characteristic syncytia
                                                                                     was evaluated by inverted phase-contrast microscopy 16 h after virus addition.
                                                                                     Numbers of syncytia were counted per view at 100⫻ magnification under a
                                                                                     phase-contrast light microscope. Serum titer was determined as a serum sample
                                                                                     at a given dilution giving ⱖ90% inhibition of syncytium formation compared to
                                                                                     that of prebleed sera.
                                                                                        Anti-gp120 serum antibody assay. Binding antibody titers against a panel of
                                                                                     HIV-1 rgp120 proteins were measured in a standard ELISA. HIV-1 rgp120s
                                                                                     from various HIV-1 isolates, including subtype B isolates of 89.6, JRFL, IIIB,
                                                                                     BaL, subtype C isolates of 96ZM651, and CON6. HIV-1 rgp120 proteins were all
                                                                                     used at a concentration of 2 ␮g/ml (200 ng/well) to coat 96-well ELISA microtiter
                                                                                     plates. Antibody endpoint binding titers were determined as the reciprocal of the
                                                                                     highest dilution of the serum assayed against corresponding recombinant HIV-1
                                                                                     envelope proteins, giving optical density readings of experiment versus control of
                                                                                     ⱖ3.0.

                                                                                                                                                                          Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
                                                                                                                       RESULTS
                                                                                        Enhanced binding of MAb 17b to A32-rgp120 complexes.
                                                                                     MAb A32 broadly reacts with a wide spectrum of HIV-1 pri-
                                                                                     mary isolates from different subtypes (26). By using surface
                                                                                     plasmon resonance assays we found MAb A32 reacted with
                                                                                     both rgp2089.6 and rgp120BaL (Fig. 1A and B). HIV-1 MAb 17b
                                                                                     constitutively bound to rgp2089.6 but was nonreactive with
                                                                                     rgp120BaL (Fig. 1C and D). Incubation of MAb A32 whole IgG
   FIG. 2. FPLC elution pattern of the cross-linked A32-gp120 com-
                                                                                     as well as Fab fragments with HIV-1 rgp120 proteins induced
plexes on a Superdex H200 column. MAb A32-rgp12089.6 (A) and                         markedly enhanced MAb17b binding to rgp2089.6 (Fig. 1C)
A32-rgp120BaL (B) complexes were made as described in Materials                      and induced de novo MAb 17b binding to rgp120BaL (Fig. 1D).
and Methods and fractionated on a Superdex HR200 column. Frac-                          Production of A32-rgp120 complexes with the CCR5 binding
tions were collected and assayed for the ability to bind MAb 17b,                    site stably exposed. The presence of stably exposed or induced
immobilized on a Biacore CM5 sensor chip. Circles represent binding
levels of each fraction to immobilized 17b MAb, while the UV trace                   CCR5 binding sites on constrained HIV-1 envelope proteins
from the FPLC run is shown with a solid line. Also shown is that the                 indicates induction of conformational changes in gp120 follow-
enhanced level of MAb 17b binding was obtained in fractions under                    ing CD4 or MAb A32 binding (1, 13, 23, 26). While the CCR5
peak 1 (molecular size of about 440 kDa) that contained the cross-                   binding site itself might not be a target for broadly reactive NA
linked rgp12089.6 (A) and rgp120BaL (B). In contrast, peak 2 containing
excess gp120 did not show upregulated MAb 17b binding.
                                                                                     (8), in this study the conformational exposure of the 17b bind-
                                                                                     ing site was monitored as an indicator of A32-induced confor-
                                                                                     mational changes in rgp120. Our postulate was that A32-trig-
                                                                                     gered rgp120 might possess conserved conformational epitopes
syncytium inhibition assay with aldrithiol-2 (AT-2)-inactivated virions (21) or a    against which broadly reactive NA could be made. Thus, we
luciferase-based multiple-round HIV-1 infection assay (2). The single-round flow
cytometric assay for intracellular p24 antigen was performed as described pre-
                                                                                     produced A32-HIV-1 rgp120 complexes by cross-linking MAb
viously (16). In the luciferase-based assay, NA were measured as a function of a     A32 and either gp12089.6 or rgp120BaL with DTSSP. To purify
reduction in luciferase activity in 5.25.EGFP.Luc.M7 cells kindly provided by        A32-rgp120 complexes and to remove uncross-linked rgp120,
Nathaniel R. Landau (Salk Institute, La Jolla, Calif.) (2). Five hundred 50%         A32-gp12089.6 and A32-rgp120BaL stable complexes were pu-
tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) of cell-free virus were incubated with
                                                                                     rified on Superdex HR200 gel filtration columns. Figure 2
the indicated serum dilutions in a volume 150 ␮l (1 h at 37°C) in triplicate in
96-well flat-bottom culture plates. The 5.25.EGFP.Luc.M7 cells were suspended        shows that the higher molecular sizes of A32-rgp2089.6 (Fig.
at a density of 5 ⫻ 105/ml in media containing diethylaminoethyl dextran (10         2A) and A32-rgp120BaL (Fig. 2B) complexes were eluted first
␮g/ml). Cells (100 ␮l) were added until 10% of cells in control wells (no test       and could be separated from uncross-linked rgp120. We next
serum sample) were positive for green fluorescent protein expression by fluo-        examined each fraction off the Superdex HR200 FPLC column
rescence microscopy. At this time the cells were concentrated twofold by remov-
ing one-half of the volume of medium. A 50-␮l suspension of cells was trans-
                                                                                     for constitutive binding activity to MAb 17b immobilized on a
ferred to 96-well white solid plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.) for measurement      Biacore chip. We found that all upregulated binding to 17b was
of luciferase activity by using Bright-Glo substrate (Promega, Madison, Wis.) on     indeed in the A32-rgp120 complex in peak 1 (Fig. 2A) fractions
a Wallac 1420 Multilabel Counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, Mass.).         containing A32-gp12089.6 complexes. Similarly, analysis of the
Neutralization titers in the luciferase assays were those where ⬎50% virus
                                                                                     A32-rgp120BaL complexes showed stable induced MAb 17b
infection was inhibited and were considered positive if the postimmune bleed
titer minus the preimmune bleed titer was ⬎30 and the postbleed titer was three      binding (Fig. 2B).
times higher than the prebleed titer. For analysis of breadth, those isolates that      Figure 3 shows SDS-PAGE gels of unpurified A32,
were neutralized by at least 2 sera per group were considered positive.              rgp2089.6, and A32-rgp12089.6 complexes both before and after
   The syncytium inhibition fusion-from-without assay utilized HIV-1 AT-2-in-        separation on a Superdex HR200 FPLC column. MAb A32
activated virions from HIV-1 subtype B strains ADA and AD8 (the gift of Larry
Arthur and Jeffrey Lifson, Frederick Research Cancer Facility, Md.). Twofold
                                                                                     sized at ⬃210,000 Da while rgp12089.6 was 120,000 Da. Unpu-
serially diluted immune and control sera starting at 1:10 dilution were incubated    rified A32-rgp12089.6 complexes contained higher-molecular-
with optimal dilution (1:80, which results in approximately 80 syncytia in the       size complexes as well as excess uncomplexed rgp120. Peak 2 in
VOL. 78, 2004                                                         CONSTRAINED MAb A32-HIV Env gp120 COMPLEXES                      5273

                                                                                                                                               Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
   FIG. 3. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of unfractionated and FPLC-fractionated A32-rgp120 complexes. MAb A32-rgp12089.6 com-
plexes were made as described in Materials and Methods, fractionated on a Superdex HR200 FPLC column (bottom panel), analyzed, and
compared to unfractionated rgp120, A32, and A32-rgp120 by Coomassie staining (A) and Western blot (B) of the reducing (middle frame of panel
A) and nonreducing (top frame of panel A) SDS-PAGE. In Western blotting run under nonreducing conditions, HIV-1 envelope-specific MAb
T8 was used to detect rgp12089.6 in the A32-rgp12089.6 complexes (top frame of panel B), and anti-human Ig was used to detect human MAb A32
(middle frame of panel B). Samples in the individual lanes are corresponding the fractions off the Superdex H200 FPLC column (bottom frames
of panels A and B). The analysis demonstrates that complexes made with one gp120 or two gp120s bound to MAb A32 indeed contained both MAb
A32 and rgp12089.6.

the chromatogram below contained free rgp120 (fraction lane                Ability of antisera against A32-rgp120 complexes to react
23, 24, and 25), while A32-rgp12089.6 complexes eluted in peak          with a panel of HIV-1 rgp120s. To determine if cross-linking
1 (fractions 18 to 21). The weak lower-molecular-size band in           89.6 or BaL rgp120s prevented induction of anti-gp120 anti-
fraction 21 reflected complexes comprised of one rgp120 and             bodies, we screened anti-A32-rgp120 complex antisera for re-
one A32 molecule, while the higher-molecular-size band in               activity with a panel of four subtype B rgp120s (89.6, JRFL,
fractions 18 to 20 reflected saturated A32 MAb with two bound           IIIB, and BaL), a group M consensus Env rgp120 (CON6), and
rgp120s. Under reducing conditions (the middle panel) the               a subtype C rgp120 (96ZM651). We found that both 89.6 and
complexes in fractions 18 to 21 all contained rgp120 as well as         BaL rgp120 complexed with A32-induced anti-gp120 antibod-
55,000 Da of Ig heavy chains and 29,000 Da of Ig light chains.          ies equally well, with both types of antisera reacting with each
In Fig. 3B, Western blot with an anti-human Ig (middle panel)           rgp120 (Fig. 4).
and anti-gp120 mouse MAb T8 (lower panel) confirmed that                   NA induced by A32-rgp120 complexes compared to that of
the complexes in peak 1 contained both rgp120 and MAb A32.              rgp120 alone. Next we compared the ability of A32-rgp12089.6
Thus, both A32-rgp12089.6 and rgp120BaL complexes had sta-              (Table 1) and A32-rgp120BaL (Table 2) complexes to
ble expression of the CCR5 binding site, and these complexes            rgp12089.6 (Table 1) and rgp120BaL (Table 2) alone for their
(lanes 18 to 21 in Fig. 3) were used in a series of immunizations       ability to induce anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies. While
in guinea pigs.                                                         A32-rgp120 complexes induced antibodies that neutralized
5274       LIAO ET AL.                                                                                                                                     J. VIROL.

                                                                                     rgp120 alone and that induced by A32-rgp120 complexes.
                                                                                     While A32-rgp12089.6 complexes induced antibodies that neu-
                                                                                     tralized two additional HIV-1 isolates more than A32-
                                                                                     rgp12089.6 alone (IIIB, JRCSF), the A32-rgp120 complexes did
                                                                                     not induce antibodies that broadly neutralized five of the more
                                                                                     difficult-to-neutralize HIV-strains (US-1, US717, BL01, 6101,
                                                                                     and BG1168).
                                                                                        To determine if A32-rgp120 complexes induced antibodies
                                                                                     that inhibited HIV-1-induced fusion, we tested the sera listed
                                                                                     in Tables 1 and 2 for the ability to inhibit inactivated HIV-1
                                                                                     induced syncytium from without by using AT-2-inactivated viri-
                                                                                     ons ADA and AD8 (Table 3). We found most postimmune
                                                                                     sera had syncytium inhibiting activity, with the anti-rgp120 sera
                                                                                     titers as high or higher than those for the anti-A32-rgp120
                                                                                     complex antisera.

                                                                                                                                                                         Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
   FIG. 4. Reactivity of guinea pig anti-HIV-1 sera to a panel of                       Because the rgp120s performed as well as the A32-rgp120
HIV-1 rgp120. To determine reactivity of guinea pig postimmune sera                  complexes, we next determined the ability of antisera against 89.6
to HIV-1 gp120 envelope proteins in ELISA, a panels of HIV-1 rgp120                  and BaL rgp120s to neutralize seven subtype B HIV-1 isolates in
proteins (200 ng/well) as indicated in the X axis were coated in 96-well             a luciferase-based multiple round infection NA assay (Table 4).
microtiter plates and tested for the reactivity of sera from guinea pigs
immunized with either A32-rgp12089.6 or rgp120BaL. The endpoint                      Four isolates were the same as those tested in the single-round
ELISA titers of guinea pig sera are determined as described in Mate-                 p24 assay (BaL, BG1168, 6101, SF162), and three were different
rial and Methods and are shown in the Y axis.                                        (BX08, SS1196 and QH0692). While rgp12089.6 antisera only
                                                                                     strongly neutralized BX08 (2 out of 3 were serum positive),
                                                                                     rgp120BaL antisera strongly neutralized SF162, BX08, SS1196,
multiple HIV primary isolates (A32-rgp12089.6, 6 out of 11                           and QH0692 in addition to BaL and SF162.
isolates neutralized; A32-rgp120BaL, 4 out of 11 isolates neu-                          Taken together with the data in Tables 1 and 2, rgp12089.6
tralized), there were no profound differences between the                            neutralized 4 out of 14 HIV-1 isolates (29%) while rgp120BaL
number of HIV isolates neutralized by antisera induced by                            antisera neutralized 9 out of 14 HIV-1 isolates (64%).

       TABLE 1. Ability of MAb A32 complexed with HIV 89.6 gp120 versus 89.6 gp120 alone to induce antibodies that neutralize HIV
                                                         primary isolates
 Guinea pig no. or                                                                          % Neutralization against HIV-1 isolateb
 reference control               Immunogen
     antibodya                                             IIIB     BaL      89.6     SF162     JRCSF       US1      US717      BL01      BR07      6101     BG1168

Animal
 504                     A32-gp12089.6    complex*         53       52       99        76         73        51         37        29        99        0           0
 505                     A32-gp12089.6    complex*         29       39       96        65         54        13         10        22        97        8           0
 506                     A32-gp12089.6    complex*         53       19       94        80         52        40          0        31        90        0           0
 561                     A32-gp12089.6    complex#         11       53       97        87         50        28         18         4        95        0          12
 562                     A32-gp12089.6    complex#         90       27       95        89         53         6         13         0        91        0           0
 563                     A32-gp12089.6    complex#          8       48       91        80         42        29          0         3        60        0           1
 507                     rgp12089.6*                       21        8       99        84         47         0          2        12        99       22           4
 508                     rgp12089.6*                       32       32       97        81         73        44          3        36        97       41           0
 509                     rgp12089.6*                       32       11       96        73         48         3          9        50        90       42           5
 568                     rgp12089.6#                       59        5       98        81          8         9          9        10        72       39          20
 510                     A32 MAb*                           0        8        9         2         24        48         14        32        13       38           0
 511                     A32 MAb*                           0        0       15        16         28        30         21         7        27       40           9
 512                     A32 MAb*                           0       27       24        48         45        31         36        40        54       11          21
 565                     A32 MAb#                          14        2        0        12         10         7         15         0         0       10          15
 566                     A32 MAb#                          11       31        3        10         11        14          7        19         0       35           2

Antibody control
 HIV Ig (10,000)                                          100.2     99.5     99.9      99.9       99.2      97.8      99.7      100.1      97.9     99.3      100.2
 HIV Ig (1,000)                                            92.9     80.1     65.2      94.6       75.2      59.7      45.8       91.3      53.7     67.2       61.4
 2F5 (50)                                                  97.1     81.3     98.9      96.5       97.1      95.8      91.9       99.2      94.3     37.6       95.0
 2F5 (5)                                                   73.4     47.5     82.0      65.8       65.3      66.2      52.6       74.3      66.6     29.9       59.0
 2G12 (50)                                                 86.4     82.2     76.4      52.7       61.0      52.5     ⫺10.9       38.0      46.6     86.5       ⫺6.9
 2G12 (5)                                                  71.8     28.2     56.2      29.4       34.4      33.7     ⫺17.7       27.5      16.5     25.5      ⫺24.8
  a
    *, adjuvant CFA/IFA; #, adjuvant RC529 plus mCT. The numbers in parentheses following antibody designations are the amounts of virus isolate used in
micrograms per milliliter.
  b
    Neutralization assays were done by flow cytometric enumeration of p24 antigen-positive cells after a single round of infection of CD8-depleted PBMC. Percent
neutralization values were determined by comparing results for immune sera to the results for corresponding preimmune sera at a 1:5 dilution. Values that are ⱖ50% are
positive.
VOL. 78, 2004                                                                         CONSTRAINED MAb A32-HIV Env gp120 COMPLEXES                           5275

        TABLE 2. Ability of MAb A32 complexed with HIV BaL gp120 versus BaL gp120 alone to induce antibodies that neutralize HIV
                                                         primary isolates
  Guinea pig no. or                                                                          % Neutralization against HIV-1 isolateb
  reference control                Immunogen
      antibodya                                             IIIB     BaL       89.6    SF162      JRCSF      US1     US717      BL01    BR07     6101    BG1168

Animal
 513                       A32-gp120BaL complex†             60      78       61        88         86        42       35          0     46       21        11
 514                       A32-gp120BaL complex†             29      88       53        70         46         0        2          0     61        8         7
 577                       A32-gp120BaL complex†             45      95       22        72         64        31        8         19      0       35        11
 573                       rgp120BaL†                        72      82       90        80         88        49        6         29     81       24         0
 574                       rgp120BaL†                        39     100       67        82         77        41       25          5     75        9         0
 578                       rgp120BaL†                        66      99       68        85         64        24       21         32     30        0         6
 510                       A32 MAb*                           0       8        9         2         24        48       14         32     13       38         0
 511                       A32 MAb*                           0       0       15        16         28        30       21          7     27       40         9
 512                       A32 MAb*                           0      27       24        48         45        31       36         40     54       11        21
 565                       A32 MAb#                          14       2        0        12         10        NT       NT          0      0       10        NT
 566                       A32 MAb#                           0       8        9         2         24        48       14         32     13       38         0

                                                                                                                                                                     Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
Antibody control
 HIV Ig (10,000)                                            100.2   99.5      99.9      99.9       99.2      97.8     99.7      100.1   97.9     99.3     100.2
 HIV Ig (1,000)                                              92.9   80.1      65.2      94.6       75.2      59.7     45.8       91.3   53.7     67.2      61.4
 2F5 (50)                                                    97.1   81.3      98.9      96.5       97.1      95.8     91.9       99.2   94.3     37.6      95.0
 2F5 (5)                                                     73.4   47.5      82.0      65.8       65.3      66.2     52.6       74.3   66.6     29.9      59.0
 2G12 (50)                                                   86.4   82.2      76.4      52.7       61.0      52.5    ⫺10.9       38.0   46.6     86.5      ⫺6.9
 2G12 (5)                                                    71.8   28.2      56.2      29.4       34.4      33.7    ⫺17.7       27.5   16.5     25.5     ⫺24.8
   a
     *, adjuvant CFA/IFA; #, adjuvant RC529 plus mCT; †, adjuvant RiBi/CWS. The numbers in parentheses following antibody designations are the amounts of virus
isolate used in micrograms per milliliter.
   b
     Neutralization assays were done by flow cytometric enumeration of p24 antigen-positive cells after a single round of infection of CD8-depleted PBMC. Percent
neutralization values were determined by comparing results for immune sera to the results for corresponding preimmune sera at a 1:5 dilution. Values that are ⱖ50%
are positive.

   Thus, for both the single-round neutralization assays and the                       induce broadly reactive NA. First, because of a concern that
inhibition of virion-induced fusion assays, rgp120 was equal                           the oil adjuvants described in Tables 1 and 2 might interfere
(89.6) or superior (BaL) to A32-rgp120 complex induction of                            with the ability of constrained rgp120 to express important
anti-HIV-1 NA.                                                                         conformational neutralizing epitopes, we formulated A32-
   Evaluation of the effect of adjuvants and DTSSP cross-                              rgp12089.6 complexes in 10 ␮g of CT as an adjuvant in saline
linking on A32-rgp120 immunogenicity. We next performed                                and immunized SQ X3, followed by 50 ␮g of lipopolysac-
two additional sets of immunizations to evaluate conditions                            charide plus 10 ␮g of CT in saline for an additional two
that might affect the ability of A32-rgp120 complexes to                               boosts. This regimen achieved an endpoint titer of 1:204,800
                                                                                       against rgp12089.6 in both animals tested, an ELISA titer
                                                                                       that is sufficient for demonstrating the presence of NA.
  TABLE 3. Comparison of A32-gp120 complexes and rgp120 to                             Table 5 shows that 1 of 2 animals immunized with A32-
      induce antibodies that inhibit syncytia formation by
                   AT-2-inactivated virions                                            rgp2089.6 complexes in saline plus CT plus LPS (no. 572)
                                                                                       neutralized 5 of 11 HIV-1 isolates while the other serum
                                                     90% Syncytia inhibition
                                                           titerb for:
                                                                                       (no. 570) neutralized none. The sera from animals immu-
Guinea
pig no.
                        Immunogen   a
                                                                                       nized with rgp12089.6 alone neutralized from 2 to 4 HIV-1
                                                    HIV-1                  HIV-1
                                                    ADA                    AD8
                                                                                       isolates (Table 4). As for Table 1, there was a suggestion of
                                                                                       more breadth with A32-rgp12089.6 complexes with more
 504                   A32-gp12089.6                  90                    270        neutralization in serum 572 of HIV-1 IIIB and BaL than
 505                   A32-gp12089.6                  90                     10
 506                   A32-gp12089.6                 ⬍10                    ⬍10
                                                                                       with rgp12089.6 immune sera. However, the A32-rgp120
 561                   A32-gp12089.6                  10                     90        complex sera with saline adjuvants again did not neutralize
 562                   A32-gp12089.6                  30                    270        HIV-1 isolates B61168, 6101, BL01, US17, or US717.
 563                   A32-gp12089.6                  30                     30           The second set of control immunizations performed was
 507                   rgp12089.6                     90                     90        with rgp120BaL treated with DTSSP in the absence of A32
 508                   rgp12089.6                    270                     90
 509                   rgp12089.6                    ⬍10                    ⬍10        MAb. In contrast to when A32 was used in the complex, we
 568                   rgp12089.6                     30                    270        found that postimmune sera from three animals (H12, H13,
 513                   A32-gp120BaL                  270                    270        H14) immunized four times with DTSSP-treated rgp120BaL
 514                   A32-gp120BaL                   30                     30        neutralized 0 of 11 of the HIV-1 isolates listed in Table 4
 577                   A32-gp120BaL                   90                     30
 573                   rgp120BaL                    ⬎810                   ⬎810        (data not shown). Taken together, these controls demon-
 574                   rgp120BaL                    ⬎810                   ⬎810        strated that (i) the oil adjuvants described in Tables 1 and 2
 578                   rgp120BaL                     270                    270        did not prevent expression or recognition of conserved
  a
      Adjuvants used were the same as those described in Tables 1 and 2.               epitopes exposed on the surface of A32-rgp120 and
  b
      Reciprocal dilution at which ⬎90% of syncytia are inhibited.                     epitopes, and (ii) DTSSP treatment of rgp120BaL in the
5276         LIAO ET AL.                                                                                                                                J. VIROL.

              TABLE 4. Comparison of HIV-1 gp120 BaL and gp120 89.6 to induce antibodies that neutralize HIV-1 primary isolates

Guinea                                                           Neutralizing antibody titer of guinea pig sera against HIV-1 primary isolatea
                     Immunogen
pig no.                                      BaL              BX08                BG1168            6101              SF162            SS1196            QH0692

 573                BaL gp120               >540              >540                 ⬍20              ⬍20               1,332              317               151
 574                BaL gp120               >540              >540                 ⬍20              ⬍20               1,068              415               157
 578                BaL gp120               >540               540                 ⬍20              ⬍20                 432               71               ⬍20
 507                89.6 gp120               ⬍20               128                 ⬍20              ⬍20               >540               ⬍20               ⬍20
 508                89.6 gp120               ⬍20               215                 ⬍20              ⬍20               4,591               47                38
 509                89.6 gp120               ⬍20               ⬍20                 ⬍20              ⬍20                 374              ⬍20                22
 568                89.6 gp120               ⬍20               ⬍20                 ⬍20              ⬍20                 151              ⬍20               ⬍20
  a
    Assays were performed in the M7-luciferase-based assay, and titers are reciprocal dilutions of guinea pig serum at which 50% neutralization occurs. Boldface
numbers are those titers that were ⬎30 and postimmune sera that were three or more times greater than those of prebleed serum titers.

absence of MAb A32 eliminated the immunogenicity of                                  reasons: (i) MAb A32 reacts with many HIV-1 isolates of

                                                                                                                                                                    Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
rgp120 neutralizing determinants. Thus, the immunogenic-                             multiple subtypes, (ii) MAb A32 is as potent an inducer of the
ity of rgp120 in A32 complexes was not due to DTSSP                                  CD4i coreceptor binding site as is sCD4, and (iii) MAb A32
treatment per se.                                                                    does not bind to the CD4BS, thus leaving it open for induction
                                                                                     of anti-CD4BS antibodies (26).
                               DISCUSSION                                               While A32-rgp120 complexes with rgp12089.6 induced
                                                                                     slightly more neutralizing breadth than rgp12089.6 alone, com-
   In this study we have produced A32-rgp120 complexes with                          parative studies with A32-rgp120BaL showed that A32-
stably expressed coreceptor binding sites and have compared                          rgp120BaL complexes were less immunogenic for broadly reac-
these complexes as immunogens with uncomplexed rgp120.                               tive NA than uncomplexed rgp120BaL (Tables 2 and 5). Thus,
Our study is important in that we determined (i) that stable                         our carefully characterized A32-rgp120 complexes provide the
enhanced expression of the coreceptor binding site is not suf-
                                                                                     first data demonstrating that exposure of the coreceptor bind-
ficient for induction of broadly reactive NA in the absence of
                                                                                     ing site alone is not sufficient for induction of broadly reactive
CD4, (ii) oil adjuvant formulation did not prevent A32-rgp120
                                                                                     NA. Immunofluorescence studies on live HIV-infected cells
broadly neutralizing antigen expression, and (iii) rgp120BaL
                                                                                     have shown limited accessibility of the coreceptor binding site
alone was the best Env immunogen tested.
                                                                                     during fusion (8). In contrast, the fusion protein CD4-17b Fab
   Fouts et al. have reported that cross-linked CD4-rgp120IIIB
                                                                                     is a potent bivalent inhibitor of most HIV-1 primary isolates
and CD4-rgp140IIIB complexes, unlike uncross-linked rgp120
or rgp140, induced antibodies that neutralized a spectrum of                         (7). Clearly envelope constructs more native than A32-rgp120
HIV-1 primary isolates from multiple HIV-1 subtypes (9). Sol-                        monomers, such as A32-bound gp140 or gp160 trimers, need to
uble CD4 in cross-linked CD4-rgp120 complexes could be im-                           be tested as immunogens.
portant as a component for the ability to induce cross-reactive                         DeVico et al. have shown that expression of CD4-induced
NA in multiple ways. Human CD4 induces anti-CD4 antibod-                             neutralizing determinants defined by MAbs raised against
ies that themselves neutralize HIV-1. Indeed, absorption of                          CD4-rgp120 complexes vary in their expression on native
anti-CD4 antibodies removed some but not all of the cross-                           gp120s, being constitutively expressed on some gp120s and less
subtype neutralizing activity induced by CD4-rgp120 com-                             so on others (5). In this regard, rgp12089.6 had constitutive
plexes (5, 9). Second, CD4, when complexed to rgp120, can be                         low-level expression of MAb 17b (7) binding that increased
part of a new neutralizing determinant in the complex and/or                         after MAb A32 binding while rgp120BaL had no constitutive
induce new neutralizing determinants on rgp120 following in-                         MAb 17b binding. However, rgp120BaL induced antibodies
duction of conformational changes in rgp120 by CD4 (5, 6, 9).                        that neutralized 64% (9 of 14) of subtype B isolates tested
   We chose to study MAb A32-rgp120 complexes for several                            while rgp12089.6 was less effective, which could be due to con-

 TABLE 5. Ability of MAb A32 complexed with rgp12089.6 versus rgp12089.6 alone formulated in aqueous adjuvants to induce antibodies that
                                                neutralize HIV-1 primary isolates

Guinea                                                                              % Neutralization against HIV-1 isolatea
                     Immunogen
pig No.                                      IIIB      BAL       89.6      SF162         JRCSF     US1        US717       BL01       BR07        6101    BG1168

 570           A32-gp12089.6 complex          14         4        48         42            49        0           4             0        0         0          3
 572           A32-gp12089.6 complex          50        64        92         80            54       32          31            41       57         5          5
 558           rgp12089.6                     28        18        98         73            55       24          17            48       87        47         23
 559           rgp12089.6                      0        22       100         85            34       16           0             9       72         0          0
 560           rgp12089.6                      0         0       100         82            16       12           0            12       19         0         11
 555           A32 MAb                         2        19        13         17            12        7           0            29        0        11         27
 556           A32 MAb                        11         5        18         16             7       17           0             0       15        17         15
 557           A32 MAb                         0         1         0          3            10        7           0            34        0         0          0
  a
      % Neutralization values are based on comparison with corresponding preimmune sera at 1:5 dilution. Values that are ⱖ50% are considered positive (boldface).
VOL. 78, 2004                                                        CONSTRAINED MAb A32-HIV Env gp120 COMPLEXES                                    5277

stitutive expression of as-yet undefined conserved neutralizing       neutralized by anti-rgp120BaL sera were the isolates known to
determinants on rgp120BaL. These latter data give credence to         be easily neutralized (e.g., IIIB, BaL, SF162, 89.6), while the
the strategy of testing multiple HIV-1 primary isolate Envs to        more difficult to neutralize HIV isolates (e.g., BG11681, 6101,
select a best Env or best polyvalent Envs for induction of            US1) were not neutralized. Thus, rgp120BaL in and of itself is
broadly reactive NA.                                                  not likely to solve the HIV-1 vaccine NA immunogen problem,
   Generally, most analyses of immune sera from animals and           but as a present best Env it can serve as a starting point for
humans have shown little neutralizing activity for HIV-1 pri-         design of more native Env immunogens. These strategies in-
mary isolates (13, 14, 17, 18, 22, 24, 25). However, recent           clude formulation of trimeric rgp140BaL immunogens and pro-
analysis of immune sera raised against either polyvalent gp120        duction of constrained gp140 trimer complexes. In this regard,
(4), gp120 subunit peptides (15), or oligomeric gp160 (25) have       Fouts et al. have described the production of a single-chain
demonstrated the ability to induce antibodies that neutralized        polypeptide analogue of the CD4-rgp120 complex utilizing the
select HIV-1 primary isolates. Clearly, the majority of HIV-1         gene for rgp120BaL (10).
primary isolates neutralized by anti-gp120 immune sera in our            Taken together, our data suggest that HIV-1 BaL rgp120 is
study are more easily neutralizable than others, and the              a promising R5 envelope that can serve as a starting point for
breadth of neutralization elicited by the best immunogen,             development of an HIV-1 immunogen for induction of broadly

                                                                                                                                                             Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
rgp120BaL, is not sufficient to anticipate widespread utility as a    reactive NA against subtype B HIV-1 primary isolates.
vaccine. It is important to note that AT-2-inactivated HIV-1
virions (21) have been grown in vitro in T-cell lines and are                                   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
readily neutralized in syncytium from without inhibition assays.        We acknowledge Kim McClammy for expert secretarial assistance.
Thus, the syncytium inhibition assay used in our study is useful        We acknowledge the Proteomics Core of Human Immunology Cen-
to demonstrate the presence of inhibiting activities, but the         ter grant AI-51445, PO-1 AI-52816. This work supported by AI-15351,
assay appears to be more sensitive than the luciferase-base           HIV Team Contract grant no. N01-AI05397, AI-24030, and the NIH,
                                                                      NIAID, AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program.
multiple-round infection assay, the single-round infection cy-
toplasmic p24 staining assay, and the tissue culture supernatant                                       REFERENCES
p24 production in PBMC assay.                                          1. Berger, E. A., P. M. Murphey, and J. M. Farber. 1999. Chemokine receptors
   Fouts et al. also compared CD4-rgp120IIIB and CD4-                     as HIV-1 co-receptors: roles in viral entry, tropism, and disease. Annu. Rev.
                                                                          Immunol. 17:657–700.
rgp140IIIB complexes and found no difference in immunoge-              2. Brandt, S. M., R. Mariani, A. U. Holland, T. J. Hope, and N. R. Landau.
nicity (9). However, we have recently shown in a direct com-              2002. Association of chemokine-mediated block to HIV entry with co-recep-
parison of rgp120ADA and purified trimeric rgp120ADA as                   tor internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 277:17291–17299.
                                                                       3. Chakrabarti, S., J. R. Sisler, and B. Moss. 1997. Compact, synthetic, vaccinia
immunogens, that trimeric rgp140ADA was superior to mono-                 virus early/late promoter for protein expression. BioTechniques 23:1094–
meric rgp120 for NA induction (M. Kim, H.-X. Liao, D. Mon-                1097.
                                                                       4. Cho, M. W., Y. B. Kim, M. K. Lee, K. C. Gupta, W. Ross, R. Plishka, A.
tefiori, E. Reinherz, and B. Haynes, unpublished observa-                 Buckler-White, T. Igarashi, T. Theodore, R. Byrum, C. Kemp, D. C. Mon-
tions). We have begun to express and purify rgp140BaL trimers             tefiori, and M. A. Martin. 2001. Polyvalent envelope glycoprotein vaccine
for comparison in immunogenicity studies with rgp120BaL as                elicits a broader neutralizing antibody response but is unable to provide
                                                                          sterilizing protection against heterologous simian/human immunodeficiency
well to determine if A32-rgp140 trimer complexes have an                  virus infection in pigtailed macaques. J. Virol. 75:2224–2234.
enhanced capacity for inducing NA over uncomplexed rgp140              5. DeVico, A. L., R. Rahman, J. Welch, R. Crowley, P. Lusso, M. G. Sarngadha-
trimers.                                                                  ran, and R. Pal. 1995. Monoclonal antibodies raised against covalently
                                                                          crosslinked complexes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 and
   A critical issue for us in this study was to determine the role        CD4 receptor identity a novel complex-dependent epitope on gp120. Virol-
that adjuvants might play in the ability of conformational                ogy 211:583–588.
                                                                       6. DeVico, A. L., A. Silver, A. M. Thornton, M. G. Sarngadharan, and R. Pal.
epitopes on constrained envelope complexes to be immuno-                  1996. Covalently crosslinked complexes of human immunodeficiency virus
genic. While not an exhaustive study, we found no significant             type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 and CD4 receptor elicit a neutralizing immune re-
difference in the breadth of NA induced with oil (mineral oil,            sponse that includes antibodies selective for primary virus isolates. Virology
                                                                          218:258–263.
squalene) versus aqueous (CT and LPS) adjuvants. It was                7. Dey, B., C. S. Del Castillo, and E. A. Berger. 2003. Neutralization of human
important to rule out that the adjuvant formulation was not               immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sCD4–17b, a single-chain chimeric protein,
preventing immunogenicity. Our data suggest that induction of             based on sequential interaction of gp120 with CD4 and coreceptor. J. Virol.
                                                                          77:2859–2865.
broadly reactive NA was not prevented because of adjuvant              8. Finnegan, C. M., W. Berg, G. K. Lewis, and A. L. DeVico. 2001. Antigenic
interference with immunogenicity. However, in this regard,                properties of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope during cell-cell
                                                                          fusion. J. Virol. 75:11096–11105.
Van Cott et al. have shown that mineral oil adjuvants such as          9. Fouts, T., K. Godfrey, K. Bobb, D. Montefiori, C. V. Hanson, V. S. Kaly-
CFA and IFA can induce decreased recognition of conforma-                 anaraman, A. DeVico, and R. Pal. 2002. Crosslinked HIV-1 envelope-CD4
tional epitopes to some degree on rgp140 oligomers (25). This             receptor complexes elicit broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies in
                                                                          rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11842–11847.
issue will remain a concern in future studies of other immu-          10. Fouts, T. R., R. Tuskan, K. Godfrey, M. Reitz, D. Hone, G. K. Lewis, and
nogens, such as Env trimers.                                              A. L. DeVico. 2000. Expression and characterization of a single-chain
   Finally, it is critical to note that each incremental improve-         polypeptide analogue of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120-
                                                                          CD4 receptor complex. J. Virol. 74:11427–11436.
ment in induction of breadth of NA by experimental immuno-            11. Gaschen, B., J. Taylor, K. Yusim, B. Foley, F. Gao, D. Lang, V. Novitsky, B.
gens is important. The rgp120 human Phase III trial was not               Haynes, B. H. Hahn, T. Bhattacharya, and B. Korber. 2002. Diversity con-
                                                                          siderations in HIV-1 vaccine selection. Science 296:2354–2360.
successful, suggesting that rgp120s may not be viable vaccine         12. Klausner, R. D., A. S. Fauci, L. Corey, G. J. Nabel, H. Gayle, S. Berkley, B. F.
candidates in and of themselves (12). However, that rgp120BaL             Haynes, D. Baltimore, C. Collins, R. G. Douglas, J. Esparza, D. P. Francis,
alone can induce antibodies that neutralize ⬃60% of subtype B             N. K. Ganguly, J. L. Gerberding, M. I. Johnston, M. D. Kazatchkine, A. J.
                                                                          McMichael, M. W. Makgoba, G. Pantaleo, P. Piot, Y. Shao, E. Tramont, H.
HIV-1 isolates provides a beach head from which to work to                Varmus, and J. N. Wasserheit. 2003. The need for a global HIV vaccine
improve the immunogenicity. Clearly, most HIV-1 isolates                  enterprise. Science 300:2036–2039.
5278       LIAO ET AL.                                                                                                                                       J. VIROL.

13. Kwong, P. D., M. L. Doule, D. J. Casper, C. Cicala, S. A. Leavitt, S. Majeed,         and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley &
    T. D. Steenbeke, M. Venturi, I. Chaiken, M. Fung, H. Katinger, P. W. I. H.            Sons, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind.
    Parren, J. Robinson, D. V. Ryk, L. Wang, D. R. Burton, E. Freire, R. Wyatt,     20.   Ohagen, A., A. Devitt, K. J. Kunstman, P. R. Gorry, P. P. Rose, B. Korber,
    J. Sodroski, W. A. Hendrickson, and J. Arthos. 1998. HIV-1 evades anti-               J. Taylor, R. Levy, R. L. Murphy, S. M. Wolinsky, and D. Gabuzda. 2003.
    body-mediated neutralization through conformational masking of receptor-              Genetic and functional analysis of full-length human immunodeficiency virus
    binding sites. Nature 393:678–682.                                                    type 1 env genes derived from brain and blood of patients with AIDS.
14. LaCasse, R. A., K. E. Follis, T. Moudgil, M. Trahey, J. M. Binley, V.                 J. Virol. 77:12336–12345.
    Planelles, S. Zolla-Pazner, and J. H. Nunberg. 1998. Coreceptor utilization     21.   Rossio, J. L., M. T. Esser, K. Suryanarayana, D. K. Schneider, J. W. Bess,
    by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is not a primary determinant of                Jr., G. M. Vasquez, T. A. Wiltrout, E. Chertova, M. K. Grimes, Q. Sattentau,
    neutralization sensitivity. J. Virol. 72:2491–2495.                                   L. O. Arthur, L. E. Henderson, and J. D. Lifson. 1998. Inactivation of human
15. Letvin, N., S. Robinson, M. K. Axthelm, M. Bilska, H.-X. Liao, B. F. Haynes,          immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity with preservation of conforma-
    and D. C. Montefiori. 2001. Vaccine-elicited V3 loop-specific antibodies in           tional and functional integrity of virion surface proteins. J. Virol. 72:7992–
    rhesus monkeys and control of a SHIV expressing a primary patient HIV-1               8001.
    isolate envelope. J. Virol. 75:4165–4175.                                       22.   Schonning, K. 2003. Antibody neutralization of human immunodeficiency
                                                                                          virus type 1 (HIV-1). APMIS 111:1–42.
16. Mascola, J. R., M. K. Louder, C. Winter, R. Prabhakara, S. C. De Rosa, D. C.
                                                                                    23.   Trkola, A., T. Dragic, J. Arthos, J. M. Binley, W. C. Olson, G. P. Allaway, C.
    Douek, B. J. Hill, D. Gabuzda, and M. Roederer. 2002. Human immunode-
                                                                                          Cheng-Mayer, J. Robinson, P. J. Maddon, and J. P. Moore. 1996. CD4-
    ficiency virus type 1 neutralization measured by flow cytometric quantitation
                                                                                          dependent, antibody-sensitive interactions between HIV-1 and its co-recep-
    of single-round infection of primary human T cells. J. Virol. 76:4810–4821.
                                                                                          tor CCR-5. Nature (London) 384:184–187.
17. Mascola, J. R., S. W. Snyder, O. S. Weislow, S. M. Belay, R. B. Belshe, D. H.   24.   Trkola, A., T. Ketas, V. N. KewalRamani, F. Endorf, J. M. Binley, H.
    Schwartz, M. L. Clements, R. Dolin, B. S. Graham, G. J. Gorse, M. C.

                                                                                                                                                                            Downloaded from http://jvi.asm.org/ on April 24, 2021 by guest
                                                                                          Katinger, J. Robinson, D. R. Littman, and J. P. Moore. 1998. Neutralization
    Keefer, M. J. McElrath, M. C. Walker, K. F. Wagner, J. G. McNeil, F. E.               sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates to an-
    McCutchan, and D. S. Burke. 1996. Immunization with envelope subunit                  tibodies and CD4-based reagents is independent of their coreceptor usage.
    vaccine products elicits neutralizing antibodies against laboratory-adapted           J. Virol. 72:1876–1885.
    but not primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Infect.     25.   VanCott, T. C., J. R. Mascola, R. W. Kaminski, V. Kalyanaraman, P. L.
    Dis. 173:340–348.                                                                     Hallberg, P. R. Burnett, J. T. Ulrich, D. J. Rechtman, and D. L. Birx. 1997.
18. Montefiori, D. C., R. G. Collman, T. R. Fouts, J. Y. Zhou, M. Bilska, J. A.           Antibodies with specificity to native gp120 and neutralization activity against
    Hoxie, J. P. Moore, and D. P. Bolognesi. 1998. Evidence that antibody-                primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates elicited by immuni-
    mediated neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sera                zation with oligomeric gp160. J. Virol. 71:4319–4330.
    from infected individuals is independent of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:     26.   Wyatt, R., J. Moore, M. Accola, E. Desjardin, J. Robinsin, and J. Sodroski.
    1886–1893.                                                                            1995. Involvement of the V1/V2 variable loop structure in the exposure of
19. Moss, B., and P. Earl. 1998. Protein expression, p. 16.15.1–16.19.9. In F. M.         human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 epitopes induced by receptor
    Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith,           binding. J. Virol. 69:5723–5733.
You can also read