Inflation, Rising Rates and Their Impact on Infrastructure - March 2021

Page created by Juanita Gibson
 
CONTINUE READING
Inflation, Rising Rates and Their Impact on Infrastructure - March 2021
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES
                                                                                  March 2021

Inflation, Rising Rates and
Their Impact on Infrastructure
   Key Takeaways
   f Rising rates and accompanying inflation will have little impact on valuations of
     regulated assets in the medium to longer term if inflation can be directly or indirectly
     passed through to customers.
   f User-pays assets typically see cash flows increase if there is a cyclical upswing in
     growth and interest rates, with increasing valuations more than offsetting the impact
     of a rising cost of capital.
   f There appears to be little to no correlation between various infrastructure assets and
     inflation over the past 30 years.

Following on from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, central banks and governments have
aggressively stimulated their economies. The likely result of this aggressive stimulus is
rising inflation and accelerating global growth. Investors need to prepare for a world
of rising yields after a long period of structural decline. For infrastructure, in contrast to
conventional wisdom, such a scenario need not be feared, but rather understood and
managed. The impact of rising yields depends on whether they are in response to the
cycle or whether they represent a more fundamental structural change. Different types of
companies also react very differently.
The impact of rising rates depends on the reason for that increase. It also depends on the
type of asset. We distinguish between:
• Regulated assets, where revenues are normally determined by a return on an
  underlying asset base, which is in turn determined by the level of investment. The
  details of the way in which returns are set vary widely between assets. The main
  difference, though, relates to whether prices and the assets are index linked, and cash
  returns based on a real cost of capital (with examples in the U.K., Australia), or whether
  the regulator looks at nominal assets and grants a nominal return.
• User-pays assets, where control of prices for transport assets is usually set out in
  a contract agreed at the time of grant of the concession, with volume risk (traffic,
  passenger, container, etc.) borne by the operator. Other infrastructure
  (e.g., communications) often has long-term contracts that include price escalation.
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE

Regulated Assets                                                 User-Pays Assets
One of the most important characteristics of regulated           User-pays assets behave very differently from
assets is returns allowed by regulators will depend on           regulated utilities:
how interest rates and the cost of capital develop in            • They typically have greater exposure to GDP
the future. If interest rates rise, in order to facilitate         growth. Cash flows increase if there is a cyclical
future funding of capital investment, regulators need              upswing in growth and interest rates, with
to increase the allowed returns. Such increases do not             increasing valuations more than offsetting the
happen immediately, and may not happen automatically,              impact of a rising cost of capital.
but there is a process by which over the medium term
regulated returns should rise and fall in line with rises and    • Their long-term cash flows for existing assets do not
falls in the cost of capital (which can be assumed to relate       normally respond to changes in interest rates or the
to interest rates). The precise way this is done differs           cost of capital. This means that valuations at an exit
between countries:                                                 date respond negatively to increases in long-term
                                                                   interest rates. The negative impact will be higher
• In countries where there is a regular reset of prices (e.g.,     the longer the duration of the asset.
  the U.K. and Australia), the regulator conducts a review
  of the appropriate cost of capital at the time of the reset    • The behavior depends crucially on whether
  and uses this in the price control determination. While          assets have returns linked to an inflation index.
  the cost of capital determination may deviate (positively        Under scenarios where growth increases, inflation
  or negatively) from the underlying cost of capital, over         increases, and real rates decline, index-linked assets
  time it can be expected to match investors’ required             will demonstrate strong positive returns. Assets not
  returns and directly pass through inflation.                     linked to an inflation index would underperform.

• In other countries, companies need to apply for                While rising rates due to increased growth
  permission to increase rates (e.g., the U.S. and Canada).      expectations would be a positive to both user-
  In these systems, the appropriate regulatory authority         pays assets and regulated utilities, what about
  will also make an assessment of the cost of capital or         rising inflation?
  cost of equity and use this in the determination. Again,
  changes in the cost of capital will in the medium term be      Case Study 1: The Impact of Inflation
  reflected in the prices that the company can charge and        on European Utilities
  so in essence these assets are also able to pass through       While regulations in different countries in Europe
  higher costs that may occur from rising inflation.             have various technical differences, in essence they
The requirement for a regulator to offer reasonable              are designed to protect the remunerations utilities
returns is usually established in the legal framework            receive for capital investment against macroeconomic
supporting the operation of the utility or other asset           changes, which include inflation.
owner. This means that:                                          Nonetheless, there is one major difference within the
• Investors can expect that changes in interest rates will       sector: whether allowed returns (i.e., the weighted
  be reflected in future cash flows over the medium and          average cost of capital or WACC) are set in nominal
  longer term. As a result, the underlying asset value at        terms (as in Spain, Portugal, Czech Republic and
  an assumed investment exit date in the medium term             Poland) or real terms (as in the U.K., Italy, Sweden
  is likely to be relatively independent of interest rates.      and Hungary).
  This is because any changes to the rate used to discount       WACC and Allowed Return Set in Nominal Terms
  future cash flows will be offset by changes in cash flows      If the WACC is set in nominal terms, the regulated
  set by the regulator.                                          asset base (RAB) and total capital and operating
• Changes in interest rates and inflation in the shorter         expenditure allowances are quoted by the regulator in
  term will have an impact on valuations of regulated            nominal terms. Annual fluctuations in inflation have no
  utilities, and the impact will depend on the mechanism         impact on the allowed revenue.
  and timing by which changes in these variables are             Such companies are viewed as beneficiaries of low
  reflected in cash flows (or not).                              inflation: if inflation stays depressed, asset owners
In summary, rising rates and accompanying inflation will         may be overcompensated in the regulated cash
have little impact on valuations of regulated assets in          flows to cover cost inflation in capital and operating
the medium to longer term if inflation can be directly or        expenditures (due to allowances set in nominal terms),
indirectly passed through to customers.                          and vice versa, during the period.

2
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES
                                                                                                              March 2021

However, the lower nominal bond yields resulting from a          customer bills to reflect the increase. However, what is
low inflation rate would be factored into the regulator’s        crucial is that utilities increase their rates to customers at
return allowance in the next WACC review, and vice versa.        or around inflation over the medium to longer term.
For instance, for electricity networks in Spain, the nominal     One area where rising inflation may potentially benefit
WACC allowance for 2020–26 is based on observations of           utilities is the impact on allowed returns. Assuming
nominal bond rates (which embody the inflation trend)            real interest rates are unchanged, higher inflation
over 2012–17 during the review process in 2018–19.               leads to higher nominal interest rates, which is the
In other words, allowed returns allow for the pass-through       benchmark utility regulators refer to in determining a
of inflation, albeit with a time lag of a few years.             utility’s allowed return on equity (ROE). The higher the
WACC and Allowed Return Set in Real Terms                        nominal interest rate, generally the higher allowed ROE.
If the WACC is set in real terms, parameters such as RAB         In some instances, the allowed ROE is formulaically
and total capital and operating expenditures are typically       tied to certain interest rate benchmarks. For example,
estimated and approved by the regulator in real terms            Ameren’s Illinois electric utility has allowed ROEs that
using forecast inflation for any regulatory period. The          are annually adjusted to be 570 basis points (bps)
returns permitted by the regulator (allowed returns)             above the 30-year U.S. Treasury rate. Another example
are then adjusted annually by actual inflation when              is Edison International’s electric utility, where the 10.3%
determining the regulatory cash flow and asset base, i.e.,       allowed ROE gets adjusted up or down if the Moody’s
they are passed through to the customer through higher           Bond Utility BAA Yield moves more than 100 bps over a
rates, maybe with a lag of a few months.                         rolling 12-month period.

Consequently, if inflation in a given year within a regulatory   Having said that, history shows that allowed ROEs
period trends higher than the regulator’s forecast before        have been quite sticky (Exhibit 1), and regulators have
the start of the period, there is a momentary boost to the       tended to be quite slow in adjusting the allowed ROEs
cash flow compensation, and vice versa.                          in response to falling bond yields. As such, in a rising
                                                                 bond yield environment it is difficult to see regulators
Such companies are viewed as beneficiaries of high inflation.    increasing ROEs until they believe asset owners are not
However, taking a more holistic view over the regulatory         being fairly compensated and funding future growth
period, if high inflation sustains for multiple years, it is     has become too expensive. As context, the industry
taken into consideration by the regulator’s assumption           average allowed ROE remains healthy in the 9%–10%
heading into the next price review, thereby driving down         range, despite years of falling rates. In an environment
the real bond rate allowance embedded in the allowed             where there is a need to continue incentivizing clean
return. The impact on the asset cash flows from inflation-       energy investments and strong public policy support,
related drivers gets averaged out over the long term.            we expect ROEs to remain fairly sticky.
In addition, companies may have mechanisms to further
                                                                 Exhibit 1: Allowed Returns Slow to Adjust
moderate the sensitivity to inflation, such as using             to Falling Bond Yields
inflation-linked bonds as part of their borrowings. The
higher the proportion of debt being inflation-linked, the        20%
more muted the short-term effects from inflation shocks
are on the cash flows.                                           15%
Case Study 2: The Impact of Inflation
on North American Utilities                                      10%
Fundamentally, North American utilities are insulated
from rising or falling inflation because customer rates are       5%
regulated under a cost-of-service methodology. Under
this model, utilities are not only able to earn a return
on their invested capital (for example, investment in             0%
poles and wires), but they are also able to pass through               1984      1991        1998        2005       2012        2019
expenses to the customer (for example, maintenance,
                                                                                        Allowed ROE
taxes, fuel, etc.), subject to approval by the regulator.                               10- Year Government Bond Yield
When there is inflation and costs are rising, utilities can
file a rate case proceeding with the regulator to ask for        As of Dec. 31, 2020. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance.

                                                                                                                                       3
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE

Case Study 3: The Impact of Inflation                                      3. Midstream companies that have non-contracted
on North American Pipelines                                                   volumes/marketing arms benefit directly by selling
In the case of North American midstream pipelines, the                        product at higher prices.
impact of inflation varies depending on the nature of
                                                                           Case Study 4: The Impact of Inflation
the commercial agreement that underpins pipeline
                                                                           on North American Renewables
assets (Exhibit 2).
                                                                           Overall inflationary forces have muted valuation impact
Exhibit 2: Commercial Underpinning of Pipeline Assets                      on global renewables. While renewables companies are
                                                                           largely being compensated through 10-year–20-year fixed
100%                                                                       power purchase prices or partially inflating agreements,
                                                                           the returns assumed within these agreements tend
 75%
                                                                           to have long-term inflation assumptions embedded.
 50%                                                                       Essentially, this means that while there is no explicit pass-
                                                                           through of inflation through the pricing, a pass-through
 25%                                                                       is implicit when the contract is written and more often
                                                                           than not the contract will contain buffers for instances
  0%                                                                       like rising inflation. For example, renewables companies
           Enbridge TC Energy Williams Cheniere               Gibson       secure growth from their development pipelines, where
                                                                           fixed-price contracts for the operational stage of assets
                   Uncontracted
                                                                           are negotiated based on current market conditions.
                   Fee for Service
                   Take or Pay, without Escalators                         Meanwhile, technology is driving cost deflation,
                   Take or Pay, with Escalators                            preserving or expanding margins for renewables
                   Reg ulated Cos t of Service                             companies. Automation and software have translated to
                                                                           lowering operations and maintenance costs (the largest
As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance.
                                                                           contributors to costs), and companies largely expect
                                                                           technology to continue to bring costs down. Bloomberg
Pipeline companies that operate long-haul transmission                     New Energy Finance forecasts capital costs in renewable
networks tend to have the highest level of inflation                       energy to continue to come down through 2050. For
protection as they operate under a cost-of-service                         example, solar photovoltaics are expected to see an
methodology or have long-term take-or-pay contracts                        annualized 3% decline through 2030.
with annual escalators embedded in their terms. For
example, Enbridge’s Lakehead System (the U.S. portion                      Case Study 5: The Impact of Inflation on Toll Roads
of the Liquids Mainline System), has rates that are either                 Rights to operate toll roads are typically granted under
indexed to PPI or cost-of-service, while the Canadian                      a concession and as such usually have a finite life.
Mainline (the Canadian portion of the Liquids Mainline                     Concession deeds define the parameters under which
System) has tariffs that are a function of GDP. Enbridge’s                 the toll road may operate, and, in most cases, this
gas transmission assets, such as the Texas Eastern                         stipulates how toll prices may be increased. Generally,
network, have recently gone through a rate case to                         toll price increases are linked to inflation; however, there
redetermine rates to reflect cost inflation, among other                   are a number of variations, including:
items, which resulted in an earnings uplift.
Those midstream assets that work under a fixed-fee          • Full inflation pass-through (e.g., the Westlink M7
take-or-pay contract (such as Gibson Energy’s oil sands       in Sydney)
storage tanks) or fee-for-service model (such as Williams’s
                                                            • Partial inflation pass-through (e.g., main French and
gathering and processing infrastructure) are more
                                                              Italian toll roads’ usual 0.7x CPI)
exposed to inflation.
To the extent that higher inflation is a product of higher  • Inflation pass-through with a floor (e.g., WestConnex
commodity prices, that would generally be positive for        in Sydney has greater of CPI or 4% until 2040)
midstream companies from the following perspectives:                       • No inflation linkage (e.g., 407 ETR in Toronto and I-95 in
1. Higher commodity prices mean healthier E&P                                Virginia are free to set tolls subject to constraints)
   counterparties/customers.                                               Here we illustrate the sensitivity of toll road valuations to
2. Higher prices may lead to more E&P activity, which may                  changes in inflation according to different pass-through
   mean more infrastructure/growth capex is required.                      scenarios (Exhibit 3).

4
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES
                                                                                                                            March 2021

  Exhibit 3: Valuation Sensitivity of Toll Roads to Inflation                       • Concessions with no inflation linkage will typically
                             135%                                                     mean valuations are affected more by traffic
                                                                                      congestion and thus economic conditions.

                             125%                                                   As such, inflation is typically passed through, making
V aluation Sensitiv ity to
CPI Change f rom 2.5%

                                                                                    toll road valuations less sensitive to nominal bond rate
                                                                                    changes where this is driven by increases in inflation.
                             115%
                                                                                    Toll road valuations are, however, very sensitive to
                                                                                    changes in real bond rates without an increase in
                             105%                                                   inflation, thus increasing discount rates without the
                                                                                    benefit of inflation-driven increases in cash flows.
                             95%                                                    It is also worth noting that, often, inflation occurs at times
                                                                                    of increased economic activity, which typically results
                                                                                    in increased traffic levels, further offsetting impacts of
                             85%
                                                                                    inflation from a valuation perspective.
                                    0.0%   1.0%      2.0%    3.0%     4.0%
                             1.0x CPI Pass Through          0.7x CPI Pass Through
                                                                                    Case Study 6: The Impact of Inflation on Airports
                             Toll Floor at 2.5%                                     Airports are typically regulated to some degree, and
                                                                                    as such inflation sensitivity somewhat depends on
  As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance.
                                                                                    the regulatory model of the airport. Most airports are
  Assumes real rates remain constant and inflation change impacts nominal
  bond rates.                                                                       dual-till, where aeronautical activities are regulated and
                                                                                    non-aeronautical activities (sometimes referred to as
  The differences in inflation pass-throughs outlined above                         commercial activities) are not.
  tend to drive the following outcomes:                                             In general, both revenue streams can pass through
  • Full inflation pass-through will lead to limited sensitivity.                   inflation increases, although how this occurs varies:
                                                                 • Aeronautical: Typically, regulators set an allowed
  • Partial inflation pass-through will lead to increased
                                                                   return that regulated airport activities can earn. This
    sensitivity, albeit costs are typically fixed and increase
                                                                   allowed return is usually set for a period of five years
    with inflation, providing for improving EBITDA margins
                                                                   and includes an estimate of inflation. Increases or
    with traffic growth (historically this is why partial inflation
                                                                   decreases in the outlook for inflation are incorporated
    pass-through exists, as inflation is achieved after costs).
                                                                   at the next five-year reset and flow through into
  • Floor price increases mean valuations are sensitive below      regulated prices. Additionally, when setting prices
    the inflation floor. When inflation is decreasing, valuation   for five years, price increases are often set as CPI+x,
    increases and vice versa.                                      meaning prices are adjusted each year with inflation.

  Exhibit 4: Dual-Till Regulation for Airports

                                                                                                                                              5
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE

Exhibit 5: Dual-Till Airports Can Pass Through Inflation

                                                               SYD - Real Price Changes
 15%

 10%

  5%

  0%

 - 5%

- 10%
           2004             2006           2008            2010             2012        2014         2016          2018          CAGR
                                                                                                                               2003- 2019
                                                        Aeronautica l               Commercial

As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments, Bloomberg Finance.

  As such, aeronautical activities can be exposed to          • Passenger Volume: The other key consideration
  inflation risk for up to five years, but in many cases have   in an airport’s ability to pass on inflation effects is
  inflation linkages in actual pricing decisions.               passenger volumes, given that most revenue streams
• Non-aeronautical: Commercial revenues are usually             reflect the number of passengers multiplied by price.
  negotiated between airports and customers. As such,           As such, ticket price changes can have effects on
  short-term exposure to inflation is often dictated by         travel affordability and thus passenger numbers.
  contractual terms, while longer-term exposure is dictated     Over the last 50 years, airline ticket prices have fallen
  by bargaining power. Historically airport revenues have       in real terms often in combination with increases in
  been able to achieve inflation via passenger increases on     disposable income, stimulating travel demand. To the
  passenger-related activities such as retail and parking.      extent airline ticket price trends change, this will also
  Property revenue increases have often been above              have an impact on headline revenue.
  inflation given the scarce nature of airport land.
                                                                              Using Sydney Airports as an example, the real price
Many other factors also influence an airport’s ability to                     change in commercial activities has increased by 1.1%
pass on price increases, including:                                           annually since 2003, while aeronautical has increased by
• Passenger Mix: Increases in high-spending                                   1.9% annually over the same period (Exhibit 5).
  passenger groups such as Chinese tourists influence
  revenue outcomes.                                                           The Response of Listed Infrastructure
                                                                              Equities to Inflation
• Foreign Exchange (FX) Rates: This is typically passed
  through immediately in short-term spending rates as                         Using North America and Europe as a case study, we
  most travelers have a budget in their home currency                         have gone back 30 years and looked at the correlation
  and their spending adjusts immediately with changes                         of infrastructure assets to both core and headline
  in FX. FX rates are often influenced by the relevant                        inflation. Unsurprisingly and as we have discussed
  country bond rate expectations, which are also                              above, correlations have little, if any, linear relationship
  influenced by inflation.                                                    (Exhibit 6).1

Exhibit 6: Little Correlation Between Inflation and Infrastructure Share Prices
 Europe                                                           North America
 CPI All          30-Year      Core CPI        30-Year            CPI All                 30-Year      Core CPI                30-Year
 Water              0.09       Water               0.10           Energy Infrastructure    0.27        Electric                  0.11
 Airports          0.08        Toll Roads          0.04           Rail                     0.27        Rail                      0.07
 Gas               -0.01       Gas                -0.04           Communications            0.19       Water                    -0.03
 Toll Roads        -0.09       Airports           -0.09           Electric                  0.15       Energy Infrastructure    -0.02
 Electric          -0.16       Electric           -0.17           Gas                       0.14       Gas                      -0.03
                                                                  Water                    -0.03       Communications           -0.27
As of Feb. 28, 2021. Source: ClearBridge Investments.

6
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVES
                                                                                                           March 2021

Growth-Driven Rising Rates a Boon for                        1 Some observations and considerations: communications companies
                                                               in North America only have a data set back to 2007, and idiosyncratic
Infrastructure, While Inflation is a Pass-Through              drivers such as rapid early cycle growth and conversion to REIT
A look at how the effects of rising interest rates and         structures have to be considered when looking at correlations. Energy
inflation on infrastructure assets shows that while rising     prices, one of the key differences (with food) between headline and core
rates due to increased growth expectations would have
                                                               inflation, increase the correlation of North American infrastructure, most
                                                               notably in user-pays and energy infrastructure assets. Underlying asset
a positive impact on both utility and user-pays assets,        regulation, concession structure or contracting profile may also make
rising inflation has been an ongoing concern for the           a difference in the way user-pays and utility assets behave. Market-
market. What is clear from the above analysis is that          specific valuation techniques will also likely skew the relationship over
inflation is a pass-through, directly or indirectly, for       short periods of time. For example, the North American markets focus on
infrastructure assets and so will have a limited impact
                                                               P/E ratios, while the European markets put greater focus on long-term
                                                               cash flow valuation measures such as EV/RAB. Bond yields and inflation
on valuations. Moreover, looking at correlations of            around the world have been falling for the past 40 years.
various infrastructure assets to inflation over the past
30 years, there appears to be little to no relationship.

About the Author

              Shane Hurst
              Managing Director, Portfolio Manager
              • 23 years of investment industry experience
              • Joined ClearBridge in 2010
              • Master of Commerce (Advanced Finance)
                from the University of New South Wales
              • Bachelor of Business from the University
                of Technology Sydney

Definitions                                                  A basis point (bps) is one one-hundredth of one
                                                             percentage point (1/100% or 0.01%).
COVID-19 is the World Health Organization’s official
designation of the current novel coronavirus disease.        EV / EBITDA equals a company’s enterprise value
The virus causing the novel coronavirus disease is           divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation,
known as SARS¬CoV-2.                                         and amortization. It measures the price (in the form
                                                             of enterprise value) an investor pays for the benefit of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is an economic statistic
                                                             the company’s cash flow (in the form of EBITDA).
which measures the market value of all final goods and
services produced within a country in a given period of      Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) measure the average
time.                                                        change in consumer prices over time in a fixed market
                                                             basket of goods and services.
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a
calculation of a firm’s cost of capital in which each        Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) invest in real
category of capital (i.e. common stock, preferred            estate or loans secured by real estate and issue shares
stocks bonds, other long-term debt) is proportionately       in such investments, which can be illiquid.
weighted.
Return on Equity (ROE) is the amount of net income
returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return
on equity measures a corporation’s profitability by
revealing how much profit a company generates with
the money shareholders have invested. ROE is expressed
as a percentage and calculated as: Return on Equity =
Net Income/Shareholder’s Equity.

                                                                                                                                      7
INFLATION, RISING RATES AND THEIR IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
Unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. Fixed-income securities involve
interest rate, credit, inflation and reinvestment risks; and possible loss of principal. As interest rates rise, the value
of fixed income securities falls. International investments are subject to special risks including currency fluctua-
tions, social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in
emerging markets. Commodities and currencies contain heightened risk that include market, political, regulatory,
and natural conditions and may not be suitable for all investors.
U.S. Treasuries are direct debt obligations issued and backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government.
The U.S. government guarantees the principal and interest payments on U.S. Treasuries when the securities are
held to maturity. Unlike U.S. Treasuries, debt securities issued by the federal agencies and instrumentalities and
related investments may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. Even when the
U.S. government guarantees principal and interest payments on securities, this guarantee does not apply to losses
resulting from declines in the market value of these securities.
Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may
or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a
recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is
not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.

8
IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice
or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not
constitute legal or tax advice.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as
at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a
complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks,
including possible loss of principal.
Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”)
has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising
from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole
discretion of the user. ​
Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other
FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial
professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services
in your jurisdiction.​
Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-
1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com—Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal
distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not
bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted
under applicable laws and regulation.

Australia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Australia Limited (ABN 87 006 972 247) (Australian Financial Services License Holder No. 225328), Level 19, 101 Collins Street,
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 / Austria/Germany: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Services GmbH, Frankfurt, Mainzer Landstr. 16, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Tel 08 00/0 73 80 01
(Germany), 08 00/29 59 11 (Austria), Fax +49(0)69/2 72 23-120, info@franklintempleton.de, info@franklintempleton.at / Canada: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., 200
King Street West, Suite 1500 Toronto, ON, M5H3T4, Fax (416) 364-1163, (800) 387-0830, www.franklintempleton.ca / Netherlands: Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l.,
Dutch Branch, World Trade Center Amsterdam, H-Toren, 5e verdieping, Zuidplein 36, 1077 XV Amsterdam, Netherlands. Tel +31 (0) 20 575 2890 / United Arab Emirates: Issued by
Franklin Templeton Investments (ME) Limited, authorized and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Dubai office: Franklin Templeton, The Gate, East Wing, Level 2, Dubai
International Financial Centre, P.O. Box 506613, Dubai, U.A.E., Tel +9714-4284100, Fax +9714-4284140 / France: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., French
branch., 20 rue de la Paix, 75002 Paris France / Hong Kong: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited, 17/F, Chater House, 8 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong /
Italy: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à.r.l.—Italian Branch, Corso Italia, 1—Milan, 20122, Italy / Japan: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Japan Limited /
Korea: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Trust Management Co., Ltd., 3rd fl., CCMM Building, 12 Youido-Dong, Youngdungpo-Gu, Seoul, Korea 150-968 / Luxembourg/Benelux:
Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l.—Supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier–8A, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg,
Tel +352-46 66 67-1, Fax +352-46 66 76 / Malaysia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Asset Management (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & Franklin Templeton GSC Asset Management Sdn. Bhd /
Poland: Issued by Templeton Asset Management (Poland) TFI S.A.; Rondo ONZ 1; 00-124 Warsaw / Romania: Franklin Templeton International Services S.À R.L. Luxembourg, Bucharest
Branch, at 78-80 Buzesti Str, Premium Point, 8th Floor, Bucharest 1, 011017, Romania. Registered with Romania Financial Supervisory Authority under no. PJM07.1AFIASMDLUX0037/10
March 2016 and authorized and regulated in Luxembourg by Commission de Surveillance du Secture Financiere. Telephone: + 40 21 200 9600 / Singapore: Issued by Templeton Asset
Management Ltd. Registration No. (UEN) 199205211E. 7 Temasek Boulevard, #38-03 Suntec Tower One, 038987, Singapore / Spain: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services
S.à r.l.—Spanish Branch, Professional of the Financial Sector under the Supervision of CNMV, José Ortega y Gasset 29, Madrid, Spain. Tel +34 91 426 3600, Fax +34 91 577 1857 /
South Africa: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments SA (PTY) Ltd which is an authorised Financial Services Provider. Tel +27 (21) 831 7400, Fax +27 (21) 831 7422 / Switzerland:
Issued by Franklin Templeton Switzerland Ltd, Stockerstrasse 38, CH-8002 Zurich / UK: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML), registered office: Cannon
Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL, Tel +44 (0)20 7073 8500. Authorized and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority / Nordic regions: Issued by
Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Contact details: Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Swedish Branch, filial, Nybrokajen 5, SE-111 48, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tel +46 (0)8 545 012 30, nordicinfo@franklintempleton.com, authorised in the Luxembourg by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier to conduct certain financial
activities in Denmark, in Sweden, in Norway, in Iceland and in Finland. Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., Swedish Branch, filial conducts activities under supervision of
Finansinspektionen in Sweden / Offshore Americas: In the U.S., this publication is made available only to financial intermediaries by Templeton/Franklin Investment Services, 100
Fountain Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716. Tel (800) 239-3894 (USA Toll-Free), (877) 389-0076 (Canada Toll-Free), and Fax (727) 299-8736. Investments are not FDIC insured;
may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed. Distribution outside the U.S. may be made by Templeton Global Advisors Limited or other sub-distributors, intermediaries, dealers or
professional investors that have been engaged by Templeton Global Advisors Limited to distribute shares of Franklin Templeton funds in certain jurisdictions. This is not an offer to sell or
a solicitation of an offer to purchase securities in any jurisdiction where it would be illegal to do so.
Please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

Copyright © 2021 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.    0321
You can also read