Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance

Page created by Jeremy Miranda
 
CONTINUE READING
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
suckknucklesmokers@outlook.com

                                   Judging
                                 Methodology
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
Introduction
The Australasian Barbecue Alliance is
a non-profit incorporated association

                                             Judges
whose aim is to support the delivery
of high quality barbecue contests
across Australia & New Zealand. The

                                             Profile
ABA has established and supports
the New Zealand Barbecue Alliance
and competitors from both countries
regularly compete in each country and
points awarded at contests contribute
                                          • The event promoter selects the judges for
to the Australian and New Zealand
National Barbecue Championship
                                            any ABA Sanctioned barbecue contest.
Series.
                                          • Judges are usually people from many different backgrounds including
The ABA is supported by dozens of fully     foodies or chefs, fellow competitors, sponsors representatives and even
trained volunteer crew who take time        Barry’s from the local pub with limited palates or limited barbecue food
out from their regular work to support
                                            experience.
the ABA & NZBA and also the teams
and promoters in adjudicating a fair,     • The ABA encourages a Promoter to include a broad cross-section of people
consistent and high quality barbecue
                                            to create diversity in the judging arena, which is reflective of the real world
contest.
                                            of customers a cook or pitmaster may serve any other day.
Independent judges are a valuable
contributor to the overall contest        • ABA Crew are trained to go to great lengths to ensure a professional judging
adjudication process and by                 process and judges are expected to display a professional attitude, be
undertaking and following the ABA           attentive and supportive of the processes and any direction provided by the
Judging Methodology course are well
                                            ABA and the crew.
placed to provide fair and consistent
judging of the barbecue competitors       • The ABA Crew or Head Judge will advise the judges on the exact processes
food submissions.
                                            for the judging process so no prior judging experience is required.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
The Judging Process
                                  THE SHUFFLE                         BLIND JUDGING
                                  Judges can expect that they         Predominantly and wherever
TABLE SERVICE                     will be asked to sit away from
                                  their partners, friends or family
                                                                      practical, the ABA ensures a
                                                                      fully blind hand in process,
Judges experience full table      if attending as a group – in aid    ensuring the teams and judges
service where the food is         of ensuring no group think          are not within vision of each
brought to the table by the       or potential collusion during       other during the hand in.
ABA Crew, empty boxes             the judging process. Noting
removed and water and             that partners or spouses of
crackers provided for palate      competing team members
cleansers throughout the          at an event are ineligible to
process. The table service is     judge that event. Judges may
provided to ensure the focus      be asked to move tables at any
of the judge is squarely on the   time by the ABA Crew or Head
process of judging the food       Judge for a number of practical
only and nothing else during      or process driven reasons as
the judging process.              required.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
The Judging Process                              PORTIONS
                                                  Each hand in box will contain 6 portions minimum
EFFICIENCY                                        (of approximately 50 g per portion) with some
                                                  categories allowing multiple cuts of the same protein
The ABA Crew move quickly and carefully
                                                  and quite often teams filling the box with more
to distribute boxes to the judges table
                                                  than the minimum 6 portions required. There is no
immediately or with as little wait time as
                                                  maximum amount of meat that a team may place into
possible. This ensures the competitors food
                                                  a box, however, a judge need only take one portion
has every chance of being judged in the
                                                  from each box for the purposes of judging. However,
temperature and textural condition it was
                                                  the Judges are encouraged to try all or multiple cuts if
handed in. Some boxes will be held on a
                                                  there are multiple portions provided.
secondary hand in table within the judging
arena and shuffled once a number of boxes
have been handed in and boxes are distributed
to a judging table on a random basis as judges
require the next box to be judged. This holding
delay and shuffle may be implemented at the
Head Judges’ discretion and is more commonly
used if it not practical to have a fully blind
judging arena. Most boxes are judged within
2-3 minutes of being handed in. No matter
what the competition size and no matter when
the box was handed in.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
The Judging Process                                                                            BEEF
                                                                                                                       BRISKET
                                                                                                 PORK RIBS                                                PORK
                                                                                                                       CHICKEN                                            BEEF

SCORING TIPS
                                                                                                 OTHER                                                    LAMB
                                                                                                                                                                          PORK R
                                                                                            JUDGE NAME:           Barry Fromthepub
                                  SCORING GUIDE
                                                                                                                                                                          OTHER

                                                                                               BOX #                                                                 JUDGE NAM
                                                                                                          APPEARANCE
If multiple portions are                                                                                                    TEXTURE                       TASTE
                                                                                                                                                                        BOX #
provided in the hand in box,      There is a scoring guide at the                             6E                  9
                                  bottom of each scorecard for
                                                                                                                                7                          9
and the judge choses to
try more than one portion         easy reference whilst judging. It is
of the hand in, the judge is      expressed to judges that they score
encouraged to provide a           with integrity, professionalism
‘aggregate’ score for each of     and fairly – keeping in mind
the texture and taste elements.   that they are not required to go
For example: if portion one       looking for reasons to score an
is deemed to score a 9 and        entry harshly, rather focussing
the second portion in the box     on the generalities of the entry.
is deemed to score a 7, then      For example: A single portion
the judge is encouraged to        may have a slightly blemished                                   10 - Excellent

round up when deciding a
                                                                                                 9 - Very Good           5 - Poor

                                  appearance – which would not                         SCORE
                                                                                        KEY
                                                                                                 8 - Good
                                                                                                 7 - Average
                                                                                                                         ---- HEA D JUD
                                                                                                                                        GE ONL
                                                                                                                         4 - Minor object
                                                                                                                        3 - Portion infra
                                                                                                                                                 Y ----
                                                                                                                                           infraction
                                                                                                                                          ctio
                                                                                                                                                                           10 - Exce
                                                                                                                                                                          9 - Very G

score (which is suggested to
                                                                                                 6 - Below Averag       2 - Raw, Inedible n
                                                                                                                  e                                               SCORE   8 - Good
                                  constitute a very low score. The
                                                                                                                        1 - Major infractio
                                                                                                                                            n
                                                                                                                                                                  KEY     7 - Avera
                                                                                                                                                                          6 - Below

be an average) and provide a      judge would be expected to take            SCORING GUIDE.
score of 8 at a minimum. The      it into consideration but not move         1 - Major Infraction                     5 - Poor
Judges score in whole numbers     to deduct multiple points off the          2 - Raw, Inedible                        6 - Below Average
                                                                             3 - Portion Infraction                   7 - Average
between the range of 5 to         overall visual appeal if it is generally                                            8 - Good
                                                                             4 - Minor object
10 points only for each of 3      still quite visually appealing overall.    Infraction                               9 - Very Good
                                                                                                                      10 - Excellent
judging criteria.                                                            --- HEAD JUDGE ONLY ABOVE ---
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
The Judging Process
                                                                      THE SWEATS
                                      TEMPERATURE                     If a judge has an aversion to a
                                                                      particular protein or they are
EACH BOX                              The temperature of the
                                                                      suffering early signs of the meat
                                      barbecue portions is not a
 Judges are explicitly asked                                          sweats during the judging
                                      factor that judges will be
to judge each box on its own                                          process, they are encouraged
                                      asked to judge on as part of
merits and not to compare one                                         to sit out a round of judging
                                      the scoring process but it is
box to another. Judges are also                                       so as not to have a negative
                                      not uncommon to see steam
directed to put all other factors                                     impact on the judging process.
                                      coming off the meat in some
out of their head whilst judging
                                      hand in boxes once opened by
that individual box and to score
                                      the judges at the table.
the box on its own merits.
Judges are also asked not to
compare one box to another
no matter whether one box has
2-3 different cuts or just 1 cut. A
box with 3 cuts of meat should
not be scored higher than a
box with 1 cut just because it
has more meat in the box.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
SAMPLE entries
   Beef   CHICKEN      LAMB   PORK

Beef                Beef
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
JUDGING CRITERIA
PRESENTATION                               TEXTURE                            Taste
 YES                                        YES                                YES
• The portions are uniform in size and     • The bite is soft and moist but   • The flavours compliment the
  shape, generally.                          still has some consistency.        meat, with still some meat
• The overall colouring of any/all         • The bite comes away clean          flavour present and overall
  elements are visually appealing.           without pulling more meat          taste is pleasant.
• There is consistent saucing,               than was intended in the
  seasoning or grill marks across any/       bite.                             NO
  all portions.                                                               • The flavour has an imbalance
• The hand in box is packed neatly          NO                                  which could be too sweet,
  and overall visual appeal is very tidy                                        spicy, salty, peppery, sour or
                                           • The bite is dry or chewy.
  and enticing.                                                                 too smokey.
                                           • The bite does not come
                                             away cleanly.
 NO
                                           • The bite is too soft or mushy.
• Portions, chunks or slices
  inconsistent in size, colour and
  finishing.
• The box is under or over packed.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
Additional Considerations
INFRACTIONS                              COACHING
Infractions can be a foreign object      The ABA Head Judges are trained to locate judges within the
found in a box such as a toothpick,      group that appear to be scoring lower than the rest of the
foil, twine or other illegal garnish     table of judges. These judges may be questioned as to their
and can also be because a piece          understanding of the judging criteria and a refresher course
of food is no fully cooked or there      provided on the spot. In some cases, judges may be removed
is not enough food in the box.           from the judging arena if they are deemed to not be taking the
Judges are instructed to raise their     process seriously. Judges who attempt to contact teams during
hand if they locate a foreign object     or after the event to provide feedback, may be excluded from the
in the box which is not meat or an       event or future events at the ABA’s sole discretion.
approved garnish and an ABA Crew
member takes a photo and the
judges are then instructed to judge
the box as if there was no infraction.
In the event that a portion of meat
is drastically undercooked or raw,
the judge is still only allowed to
score a minimum 5, but the Head
Judge may award an infraction in the
tally room after taking a photo as
evidence.
Judging Methodology - Australasian Barbecue Alliance
MAINTAINING INTEGRITY
Judges are asked not to take
photos of the hand in boxes at any
stage during the process. Judges
                                             JOIN THE ALLIANCE
must not use their mobile phones                • Sanctioning the largest barbecue competitions in
during the judging process and                              Australia and New Zealand.
must not have any communication
with teams on site before or during              • National Barbecue Championships in Australia
the judging process. Judges are                                 and New Zealand.
allowed to take a personal photo
                                                        • 97,000 Facebook group members
of their placemat or a group table
picture for personal use but the                       • Not-for-profit Australian association.
photos must not include any
                                                   • Partnering with barbecue brands to bring
scorecards or people who do not
                                                  members - videos, tutorials and special events.
wish to be photographed.

        Thank you for completing the ABA judges course - please visit our facebook, twitter and
              instagram pages and join the conversation through - www.ausbbq.com.au
             @ausbbqa         facebook.com/australasianbarbecuealliance    @ausbbqa #AusBBQ
You can also read