Opening Meeting of the Evaluation Body for the 2019 cycle - Room VIII, UNESCO Headquarters 28 February - 1 March 2019 - unesco ich
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Meeting of the Evaluation Body for the 2019 cycle Opening Room VIII, UNESCO Headquarters 28 February – 1 March 2019
Opening
Objectives of the meeting
Functions and tasks
Timetable and Working methods
Overview of the 2019 cycle files
Criteria for inscription, selection
& approval
Overall reflection & discussion
2 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Opening
Outcomes of 13.COM
Inscriptions :
- 7 elements on the Urgent Safeguarding List
- 31 elements on the Representative List
- 1 programme selected to the Register of Good Safeguarding
Practices
Historic joint inscription of the two Koreas, ‘Traditional Korean
wrestling (Ssirum/Ssireum)’ on the Representative List
3 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Recommendations by the Evaluation Body
For the 13.COM, 34 files that received positive recommendations by the Evaluation Body were
inscribed, in addition to 6 files that were originally recommended for referral.
100%
4% 4% 4%
13%
90% 12%
27% 30%
37% 26% Unfavourable
80% 39% 47%
recommendations /
46% 18%
Recommandations non
70% 33%
favorables
10%
Referrals / Renvois
60% 2%
29%
50% 26%
31%
Dual option recommendations
40%
/ Recommandations avec deux
70% options
65%
30% 59% 60%
53% 50%
44% Favourable recommendations
20% 48% / Recommandations
32%
favorables
10%
0%
4 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Recommendations by the Evaluation Body
Rate of overturned non-positive recommendations (2011-2018)
80%
70% 71%
60%
50%
46%
44%
40%
33%
30%
27%
21% 23%
20% 20%
10%
0%
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
5 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Opening
Other outcomes of 13.COM
Progress in the reform of the periodic report mechanism,
moving towards a regional cycle of reporting
Initiated reflection on the participation of the NGOs in the
implementation of the Convention
General consensus and support towards establishing
guidelines for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in
emergency situations
6 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Opening
Upcoming issues of the year
Continued reflection in specific areas:
- Consultation meeting on the role of accredited NGOs within the 2003
Convention (18 April 2019)
- Expert meeting on intangible cultural heritage in emergencies
(21-22 May 2019)
- Preliminary meeting of experts on the listing mechanisms of the 2003
Convention (September 2019)
Provisional upstream dialogue for nominations of the 2019 cycle
In line with the global reflection on the listing mechanisms, the Committee
decided to introduce an upstream dialogue mechanism between the
Evaluation Body and the submitting States, provisionally for the files under
the 2019 cycle.
7 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
8 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Meeting of the Evaluation Body for the 2019 cycle Part I. Tasks and working methods of the Evaluation Body
10
Composition
Expert representatives of States
Accredited non-governmental
Electoral Group Parties non-Members of the
organizations
Committee
EG I –
Norsk Håndverksinstitutt /
(Western Europe and Pier Luigi Petrillo (Italy)
Norwegian Crafts Institute
North America)
EG II –
Czech Ethnological Society Ľubica Voľanská (Slovakia)
(East Europe)
EG III –
(Latin America and Erigaie Foundation Sonia Montecino Aguirre (Chile)
Caribbean)
EG IV – Korea Cultural Heritage Foundation
Hien Thi Nguyen (Viet Nam)
(Asia and Pacific) (CHF)
EG V(a) – Association pour la sauvegarde des
John Moogi Omare (Kenya)
(Africa) masques (ASAMA)
EGV(b) –
Egyptian Society for Folk Tradition Saeed Al Busaidi (Oman)
(Arab States)
11 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHFunctions
Para 26-31
Chapter I.8
Operational Directives
12 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHFunctions
Evaluation of…
List of Intangible Cultural Register of Good
Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding Practices
Safeguarding
Representative List of the
Intangible Cultural Heritage
of Humanity
International Assistance for
amounts greater than
US$100,000
13 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHFunctions
Evaluation based on…
information in the FILES
AND NOT ON
other knowledge about the
element/project
14 14 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHFunctions
Assess conformity with criteria
Binding Recommended
Operational Directives Recommendations by:
Committee Decisions Committee
Previous Bodies
15 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH16
Tasks
Draft recommendations to the Committee to:
Not Refer the file to the
submitting State for
Inscribe Inscribe additional
information
Select OR Select OR
Refer the file to the
Approve Approve submitting State
and recommend for
dialogue
17 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks
Referral option should be used
in the case of information
lacking in a nomination,
The Secretariat transmits
whether it be of a technical or
questions of the Evaluation
substantial nature
Body on files submitted for the
2019 cycle to States Parties
concerned after the June
meeting; and submitting States
that receive such questions
submit clarifications to the Body
before the September meeting
18 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks
Report to the Committee
A two-part report:
General report Report for each mechanism
Overview of files and working Table of recommendations
methods
Draft decision on each file
General observations on all files
evaluated, recurrent and cross-
cutting issues and additional
recommendations
Overall decision
19 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks
Draft decisions
Summary description
Criteria
(satisfied, not satisfied)
Conclusion
- to inscribe,
- not to inscribe
- to refer / refer with ‘dialogue’
Additional considerations addressed to the
submitting State
20 20 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks of the Chairperson
Open and close the meetings;
Direct the discussion, ensure smooth conduct of proceedings and
maintenance of order;
Evaluation Body Seek to secure a consensus whenever possible;
meetings Summarize decisions;
Formulate with the Vice-Chairperson and Rapporteur specific
questions to be addressed to submitting States for files included in
the dialogue process.
Validate the final text of the report of the Body, including the draft
decisions;
Report Formulate with the Vice-Chairperson and Rapporteur the opinion
of the Evaluation Body on each file concerned by the dialogue
process.
Present the files evaluated, which includes:
- the main points of the debate on each file;
Committee
- the draft decisions;
meeting - (for ‘dialogue’ cases) the Evaluation Body’s opinion on the
21 answers provided by submitting States.
© All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks of the Vice-Chairperson
Rule 14.2, Rules of Procedure of the Committee
‘A Vice-Chairperson acting as Chairperson shall have the
same powers and duties as the Chairperson’
22 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTasks of the Rapporteur
Take notes of the debates and recommendations on each file;
Note recurrent and cross-cutting issues;
Evaluation Body
Formulate with the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson specific
meetings questions to be addressed to submitting States for files
included in the dialogue process.
Prepare the draft report based on the discussions during the
June meeting;
Integrate comments and additional observations from the
September meeting;
Report Finalize with the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson the report,
incorporating feedback from Body members;
Formulate with the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson the
opinion of the Evaluation Body on each file concerned by the
dialogue process.
Committee Present the general report (working methods used, main
meeting results, cross-cutting issues and general recommendations)
23 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH24 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
Responsibilities
Secretariat Evaluation Committee
• Registers files
Body • Examines files and
• Assesses technical reports
• Evaluates quality of
completeness nominations • Decides on
• Makes documents compliance with
• Assesses compliance criteria
available to Body, with criteria
Committee, public • Decides on
• Assesses conformity conformity with prior
• Facilitates work of the with prior Committee
Body and the Committee decisions
decisions
Committee • Addresses
• Identifies transversal considerations to
issues submitting States
• Addresses • Addresses
recommendations considerations to
• Report results to the States Parties in
Committee general
25 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
2019 cycle
April to March to October
September 2018: 2019: November/
31 March 2018:
Nomination files Nomination files December 2019:
Nominations
assessed by the evaluated and Nomination files
submitted by the
Secretariat and report prepared examined by the
States Parties
completed by the by the Evaluation Committee
States Parties Body
26 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
April to March to November/
31 March
September October December
2018
2018 2019 2019
Secretariat
October to January to
30 June October to December May
April to June
2018: December 2018: 2019:
2018:
2018:
Registration Letter to Revised files Files
submitting Registration
of original and translated,
States of revised
files and supporting and
requesting files; second
technical documents translations
additional technical
assessments uploaded uploaded
information assessments
online online
27 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
Technical assessment
Decision 7.COM 11
‘…nominations that do not comply strictly with
the following technical requirements will be
considered incomplete and cannot consequently
be transmitted by the Secretariat for evaluation
and examination but will be returned to the
submitting States that may complete them for a
subsequent cycle…’
28 28 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
2019 cycle
April to March to October
September 2018: 2019: November/
31 March 2018:
Nomination files Nomination files December 2019:
Nominations
assessed by the evaluated and Nomination files
submitted by the
Secretariat and report prepared examined by the
States Parties
completed by the by the Evaluation Committee
States Parties Body
29 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
April to March to November/
31 March
September October December
2018
2018 2019 2019
Evaluation Body
3 to 7 June 2019:
March to June Second meeting:
2019:
Collective
Individual evaluation of each
March 2019:
evaluations of each file resulting in a
First meeting file through a consensus for
password- draft decisions and
protected, the files to be
dedicated website included in the
dialogue process
30 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHTimetable
April to March to November/
31 March
September October December
2018
2018 2019 2019
Evaluation Body
18 to 20 14 to 18 October
September 2019: 2019: 25 October 2019
June to July
2019: Third and final Final texts of
Revised
meeting: collective
Collective collective
reports drafted Adoption of the reports reports
by the reports and circulated to all validated by
Rapporteur discussion on Chairperson and
files concerned members for
corrections Rapporteur
by dialogue
Dialogue
Answers Body members Formulation of
Questions sent received from provide Body’s opinion
to submitting States and individual on each file
States made available opinions on concerned by
31 to the Body answers
© All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH
dialogueTimetable
April to March to November/
31 March
September October December
2018
2018 2019 2019
Committee
9 to 14
December 2019
11 November 2019 9 to 14
December 2019 Chairperson
Report and
presents files
separate notes for Rapporteur
evaluated to the
dialogue files made presents the
Committee, with
available online for general report to
the main points of
consultation the Committee
the Body’s debate
on each file
32 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICH33
Overview of files
6 Urgent Safeguarding List
(of which 2 USL+IA)
42
52files 3
Representative List
Register of Good Safeguarding Practices
1 International Assistance
Of which 5 multinational files
34 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHOverview of files
2 Not inscribed in previous cycles
52
files
3 Referred in previous cycles
47 New Submissions
35 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHOverview of files
Para 13 Operational Directives Decision 10.COM 10 (para 22)
States Parties are encouraged to Further decides that, if a file has
jointly submit multi-national been referred, a criterion having
nominations to the List of been satisfied, on the basis of the
Intangible Cultural Heritage in information contained in the
Need of Urgent Safeguarding and original file, will not be considered
the Representative List of the automatically as such in the future
Intangible Cultural Heritage of examination of the resubmitted
Humanity when an element is file;
found on the territory of more than
one State Party.
36 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHChallenges
How to?
Maintain consistency from year to
year, from one file to another, and
within cycle;
Evaluate files according to
evolving standards and
jurisprudence;
Include provisional upstream
dialogue in the evaluation
process.
37 © All Rights Reserved: UNESCO/ICHYou can also read
