Monitoring and Evaluation Tools for SDG Local Actions in Chubu, Japan - United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Voluntary Local Review Series: Monitoring, data and indicators
20 January 2021
Monitoring and Evaluation Tools for
SDG Local Actions in Chubu, Japan
United Nations Centre for Regional Development (UNCRD)
0
Monitoring Package for SDG Management
Information dissemination
Data collection tools SDGs evaluation tools tools
Existing statistical SDGs-VLR
data SDGs management report
Evaluation from a viewpoint of
SDGs Governance
Participatory information SDGs-Dashboard
collection tool SDGs visualization tools
Evaluation of
SDGs Achievement PR / Information
Action promotion tools Information Dissemination
1
1. Framework of indicators for evaluation from a governance point
of view
• Consisting of four steps which are necessary to initiate and implement the SDGs
• Setting “quantitative” indicators that can be extracted from various plans, council
minutes, etc. so that data can be collected by all local governments
3. Monitoring 4. Partnership
1. Governance system 2. Goal setting
- Leadership of Mayor - Citizens’
- Policy and plans about - Data collection
understanding of SDGs
SDGs
- Participation in external
- Responsible departments - Reflection of SDGs in - Corporate
accreditation system
and personnel partnership
existing plans
- Dissemination of
- Partnership with
- Setting numerical information to citizens
- Industry-academia- universities and other
targets
government-citizens - Dissemination of activity groups
collaboration - Perspective of information domestically
- International
inclusiveness and internationally
partnership
- Interest of local
councilors
Provisional results Steps/items for indicators Indicators Nagoya City Toyota City
Policy speech: none Policy speech: 1
Number of mayor’s mentions on SDGs in her/his
Leadership of Mayor Press conference: Press conference:
1. Governance system
statements
2/32 1/10
Existence of SDG department and number of
Responsible departments and personnel Yes Yes
personnel
Collaboration between Industry, Number of platforms and consortia for
8 6
Government, Academia and Citizens collaboration on SDGs
11 (2020) 11 (2020)
Number of parliamentary questions regarding 10 (2019) 14 (2019)
Level of interest of city councilors
SDGs 3 (2018) 7 (2018)
2 (2017) 4 (2017)
Yes Yes
Existence of basic policies / plans and number of
Policy and plans about SDGs Number of Goals:7 Number of Goals:
goals to be addressed
10
2. Goal Setting
Positioning of SDGs in existing plans Reflection of SDGs in comprehensive city plan Yes Yes
Number of numerical targets which correspond to SDG Plan: 36 SDGs Plan: 23
Setting numerical targets related to SDGs Comprehensive Comprehensive
each SDG goal
Plan: 138 Plan: 222
722 (2019) 1,524 (2019)
Number of parliamentary questions regarding 710 (2018) 1,458 (2018)
“No one will be left behind”
policy measures for vulnerable groups 771 (2017) 1,205 (2017)
752 (2016) 1,242 (2016)
Data Collection for SDGs indicators Number of open data 501~1,000 101~500
0 0
3. Monitoring
Participation in external accreditation Number of participation in external accreditation
7 14
Number of seminars held for citizens and
Dissemination of information to citizens (Number of (Number of
participants
participants: TBC) participants: TBC)
Dissemination of information domestically ３ (2019) 5 (2019)
Number of press releases on SDGs
and internationally
7.9% 30.5%
Citizens’ understanding and penetration Citizens’ awareness ratio of SDGs
(2019 survey) (2020 survey)
4. Partnership
Corporate Partnership Number of corporate partnerships for SDGs 23 102
Partnerships with universities and activity Number of activity groups/ organizations 9 45
groups collaborating on SDGs
8 Organizations 5 organization
Number of international organizations, institutions,
International Partnership 6 sister cities 4 sister cities4
sister cities collaborating on SDGs
2. Indicators for measuring the degree of SDG achievement
Selection process of evaluation indicators
17 goals, 169 targets
Step 1
Extraction of 143 targets, Review of
which can be addressed at the local government level
existing
indicators:
Step 2
Selection of indicators for SDG achievement - Global
for each of the 143 targets Indicators
- OECD
- SDSN
Step 3 - Local SDGs
Consolidated them into 56 indicators responding to each goal indicators
suggested by
GoJ
Step 4
Each indicator is standardized into a level of achievement (0%-100%)
The geometric mean of the indicators for each goal is used to
show the achievement level.
42. Proposed indicators to measure the SDG Achievement
Relationship between indicators and targets
1.1 5.1 9.1 13.1 No. of residents in flood-prone 16.1
No. of recognized sexual Per employee value added
Relative poverty rate areas per 100,000 persons No. of recognized
1.2 5.2 crimes per 1,000 women 9.2 of manufactured goods 16.2
13.2 homicide cases Per
5.3 9.3 100,000 persons
1.3
13.3 No. of persons transported for 16.3
Percentage of households Gender Parity Index CO2 emissions per million heat stroke per 100,000
1.4 5.4 9.4 16.4
receiving welfare benefits in housekeepers yen of value added 13.a
1.5 5.5 9.5 CO2 emissions per 16.5
capita No. of consultations
5.6 9.a 13.b
1.a 16.6 on child abuse of per
Number of homeless Gender Parity Index in
Number of patent applications 1,000
5.a managerial occupation 9.b per 100,000 persons 16.7
1.b Elementary-school
5.c 9.c 14.1 students
16.8
2.1 No. of malnutrition 14.2
deaths per 100,000 10.1 16.9
2.2 Income growth rate for the River BOD
people 6.1 Water supply 14.3 Voting rate of election
10.2 bottom 40% of income 16.10
2.3 penetration rate earners
Rate of children with 6.2 14.4
malnutrition 10.3 16.a
2.4 6.3 14.5 Percentage change in sales 16.b
10.4
2.5 Food self-sufficiency 6.4 amountof catches and harvests
Population penetration 14.6
rate rate of sewage treatment 10.5
2.a 6.5 Labor's share 14.7
Aagricultural 10.6
2.b 6.6 Number of arrests for
output per farmer Per capita water consumption 14.a
10.7 Violating fishery-related laws 17.1
2.c 6.a for domestic use and regulations
14.b 17.2
10.a
6.b
3.1 14.c 17.3 Financial strength
10.b Unemployment rate of index
3.2 Neonatal mortality foreign workers 17.4
7.1 Rate of population receiving 10.c
rate
3.3 electricity 17.5
7.2 15.1
11.1
3.4 Ratio of renewable 17.6
No. young deaths per 7.3 15.2
energy to final energy 11.2
1,000 people 17.7
3.5 7.a consumption Percentage of households Internet coverage
11.3 15.3
below minimum standard of Net rate of change in 17.8 (4G/5G population
3.6 7.b Energy consumption living forest area coverage)
Number of suicides 11.4 15.4
gross per capita product 17.9
3.7 per 100,000 people
11.5 15.5 Number of cases of
Public transportation 17.10
3.8 8.1 poaching and illegal trade
coverage 15.6
11.6 of plants and animals per 17.11
Healthy life expectancy 8.2 100,000 population Number of sister
3.9 15.7
11.7 (friendship) cities
17.12
3.a 8.3 Growth rate of gross
municipal product per 11.a 15.8
SPM concentration Number of confirmed 17.13
3.b No. of deaths from traffic 8.4 capita 15.9 invasive alien species
accidents per 10,000 11.b 17.14
3.c 8.5
11.c 15.a 17.15
8.6 Unemployment rate Awareness of the
3.d 15.b SDGs
17.16
8.7 12.1
4.1 Amount of waste generated 15.c 17.17
8.8 12.2 from business activities per
Ratio of children on Rate
4.2 Percentage of the population aged gross municipal product 17.18
Rate of children waiting 12.3
8.9 15-24 who are not in employment,
4.3 for nursery school schools or job training 17.19
kindergartens 8.10 12.4
4.4
Rate of junior high graduates 8.a 12.5
Hazardous waste
4.5 going to higher education
8.b 12.6 disposal rate
4.6
Gender Parity Index in 12.7
4.7 university entrance 1.1 Issues that cannot be addressed at
12.8
the local government level
4.a Recycling rate
12.a 1.1 Evaluation indicators handled only
Average percentage of correct answers
4.b on a prefectural basis
on academic assessments 12.b
4.c
12.c3. Visualization of the results (provisional) of achievement evaluation
for Toyota City
Toyota City
• A relatively high level of achievement,
including poverty, health, education, and
industry & technological innovation.
• However, agriculture, gender equality, Level of achievement for each goal
and climate action are still below 50% of
achievement
97 44 98 100 21 95 75 79 99
80 points or higher
70 - 80 points
62 62 74 50 86 77 58 62
60 - 70 points
50 - 60 points
Less than 50 points
Change from previous year
1.00以上上昇
0.25 – 1.00
-0.25 – 0.25
-0.25 – -1.00
1.00以上低下
前年データなし
6You can also read
