Plastic response of Pacific madrones to environmental stressors

Page created by Erik Harris
 
CONTINUE READING
Plastic response of Pacific madrones to environmental stressors
Plastic response of Pacific madrones
                                     to environmental stressors

                     1
                         Monica Eskander, 1Katie L Smith, 2Monique Messih, and 3Makayla Monds
   1
       University of California, Davis; 2University of California, Riverside; 3University of California, Los Angeles

                                                       ABSTRACT

          Montane meadows provide a wide range of ecosystem services and host rich
          biodiversity. These regions of increased biodiversity are under the threat of conifer
          encroachment due to changes in climatic conditions. Pioneer species established along
          meadow edges, such as Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), have been shown to
          facilitate Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) encroachment into meadows. By
          biologically altering the soil through mycorrhizal associations, madrones create suitable
          conditions for coniferous growth. Our results suggest that Pacific madrones
          physiologically adjust leaf thickness for optimal resource allocation depending on
          climatic conditions. In meadow edges, Pacific madrones show an increase in leaf
          thickness when compared to trees in their ideal forest habitat. This plasticity allows
          madrones to inhabit meadow edges, leading to further facilitation of conifer
          encroachment into montane meadows.

          Keywords: madrones, meadows, encroachment, plasticity

   INTRODUCTION                                                   Lubetkin et al. 2017). Over the last 60 years,
                                                                  the proportion of tree occupation in
     In temperate forest ranges, meadows                          meadows has increased from 8% to 35% in
   support rich biodiversity. Meadows provide                     the Pacific Northwest (Zald et al. 2012)
   fundamental      ecological    services    by                    Montane meadows are usually unable to
   regulating groundwater distribution into                       support woody vegetation due to their
   streams and offering specialized habitat for                   shallow, clay soils and bedrock basins.
   nesting, courtship, foraging, and pollination                  During the winter rainfall season and
   (Lubetkin et al. 2017). A rapid decline in                     groundwater travels from mountain tops,
   meadows over recent years has posed a                          meadow soils are saturated with water.
   considerable threat to forest ecosystems.                      Excess water prevents young saplings from
   This is predominantly attributable to conifer                  establishing in these meadows due to root
   encroachment, which has been triggered by                      rot (Lubetkin et al. 2017). However,
   changes in climate and precipitation (Arno                     depressed precipitation could decrease the
   and Gruell 1986, Haugo and Halpern 2007,

                 |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44              Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                             1/6
Plastic response of Pacific madrones to environmental stressors
levels of saturation that usually prevent                and Penuelas 2006, Mitchess et al. 2008),
   woody plant encroachment.                                we used leaf thickness as a metric of water
     In addition to the abiotic drivers of conifer          retention and desiccation defense. We
   expansion, neighboring Pacific madrones                  quantified differences in the physiological
   (Arbutus menziesii) facilitate conifer growth            response of madrones between habitats.
   as well. Madrone roots form mycorrhizal                  We hypothesized that at the edges of
   associations that alter soil composition,                meadows, madrone leaves would increase
   benefiting adjacent coniferous growth and                in thickness as overall water availability
   encouraging recruitment near meadows                     increases and sunlight intensifies. Plastic
   (Amaranthus and Perry 1989). Although                    physiological responses to differential
   madrones are capable of establishing along               habitat resources are indicative of resilience
   meadows, those located in habitat edges                  to environmental stressors. This work may
   endure more severe conditions than those                 contribute towards the understanding of
   deeper in the forest, such as increased                  conifer encroachment and the application
   water saturation and sunlight exposure                   of efficient conservation efforts.
   (McDonald and Tappeiner 1990).
     As a pioneer species, madrones quickly                 METHODS
   emerge following a disturbance and exploit
   newly available resources (McDonald and                  2.1 Study site
   Tappeiner 1990; Amaranthus and Perry
                                                              Our research was conducted at the
   1988). Madrones thrive in disturbed
                                                            Angelo Coast Range Reserve in Mendocino
   conditions, yet increased sun exposure and
                                                            County, California, which is part of the
   soil water levels threaten their survival
                                                            University of California’s Natural Reserve
   when they sprout near meadows
                                                            System. We conducted research from May
   (McDonald and Tappeiner 1990). Despite
                                                            3 to 9, 2021. The reserve lies in the upper
   being a strong competitor along meadow
                                                            watershed of the South Fork of the Eel
   edges, forested areas are the optimal
                                                            River. The reserve covers 7,660 acres of land
   madrone habitat, as canopy cover and
                                                            and consists of nine terrace meadows and their
   quickly draining soil on slopes offer
                                                            upland slopes which are populated chiefly
   improved living conditions (McDonald and
                                                            by Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii),
   Tappeiner 1990). Changing climate is a well-
                                                            tanoak (Notholithocarpus densiflorus), live
   documented mechanism of conifer
                                                            oak (Quercus spp.), California bay laurel
   encroachment into meadows (Lubetkin et
                                                            (Umbellularia californica) and Pacific
   al. 2017; Hughes 1990, Arno 1986). Less
                                                            madrone (Arbutus menziesii). The reserve
   studied, however, is how madrones are
                                                            has a Mediterranean climate with a high of
   surviving along meadow edges to
                                                            31oC during summer and a low of 3oC in
   supplement conifer growth.
                                                            winter. The average annual precipitation is
     This study investigates differences in
                                                            215.6 cm.
   resource allocation between meadow and
   forest madrones, and potential indicators of
   stress on plants, such as foliar fungal
   infections. Following (Búrquez 1987, Ogaya

             |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44         Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                      2/6
2.2 Research Design

     We surveyed Pacific madrones at the
   edges of meadows and in forested areas.
   Within the reserve, we surveyed a total of
   13 Pacific madrones in the White House
   Meadow, Wilderness Lodge Meadow, South
   Meadow, Sprague Meadow, Lower Walker
   Meadow, Upper Walker Meadow, Angelo
   Meadow and USGS Meadow (Fig. 1). In
   forested sites, we surveyed a total of 27
   Pacific madrones along the Alquist Trail,
   Guimelli Trail and Main Road Trail. We
   surveyed madrones in meadows that had                 Figure 1: Map of the meadows (blue) and forested
   canopies that reached the open meadow,                areas (red) that we surveyed at Angelo Coast Range
   whereas forest madrones were located at               Reserve.
   least 50 m from a meadow. Each tree                   Table 1: The scale that we used to rate the infection
   measured       greater    than    0.15     m          of each madrone leaf across both sites.
   circumference at breast height. At each
   meadow site, every madrone was sampled
   along the meadow’s edge. Within the forest
   sites, we targeted madrones with leaves
   that could be reached by hand or removed
   with a 12-foot pole. Madrone leaves grow
   in distinct clumps. We gathered the lowest
   three clumps and randomly selected 5 focal
   leaves. At each tree, we recorded
   circumference at breast height, any
   surrounding woody vegetation with a
   diameter larger than 0.15 m within a 7 m
                                                         2.3 Statistical Analysis
   radius, as well as the length, width,
   thickness, and cover of fungal infection of             All statistical analyses were conducted
   the 5 focal leaves. To quantify fungal                using JMP statistical software v15.0. We ran
   infection, leaves were rated on a scale from          ANOVA to test for differences in madrone
   0–5 according to percent cover (Table 1).             leaf thickness and infection between
                                                         meadows as well as the forested areas.

            |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44      Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                             3/6
RESULTS

     In total, we sampled 40 madrones across
   8 meadows and 3 forests. Average leaf
   thickness was larger in meadow madrones
   compared to forest madrones (n = 40, F =
   16.08, p = 0.0003, Fig. 2). Foliar fungal
   infection cover was also higher in meadow
   madrones than those that reside in forests
   (n = 40, F = 33.4464, p = 0.0001, Fig. 3).
   There was no difference in leaf length (n =
   200, F = 1.7474, p = 0.1941) or width (n =
   200, F = 0.6892, p = 0.4116) between the
   two habitats.                                                 Figure 3: The average leaf infection of madrone
                                                                 trees in meadows versus in forested areas. The left
                                                                 bar represents the madrone leaves found in the
                                                                 meadows which were much more infected than the
                                                                 right bar which are the madrone leaves found in the
                                                                 forested areas.

                                                                 DISCUSSION

                                                                   The results of our study support our
                                                                 hypothesis      that    Pacific     madrones
                                                                 individuals adjacent to meadows produce
                                                                 thicker leaves than individuals in the forest.
                                                                 This could indicate differential responses
                                                                 depending on different environmental
                                                                 pressures. There is no reason to believe
   Figure 2: The average leaf thickness of the madrone
   trees in meadows versus in forested areas. The left           madrone individuals in the meadows are
   bar represents the leaves in the meadows which                genetically distinct from individuals in the
   were thicker than the right bar which represents the          forests, which suggests this species may be
   leaves in the forested areas.                                 able to alter its resource allocation. In the
                                                                 meadow, resources may be allocated to
                                                                 producing thicker leaves as a defense
                                                                 against desiccation due to the increased
                                                                 sunlight exposure (Ogaya and Penuelas
                                                                 2006). This physiological response may
                                                                 provide a competitive benefit for madrone
                                                                 survival under stressful environmental
                                                                 conditions, such as intensified sunlight at
                                                                 the edges of meadows.

              |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44              Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                           4/6
Pacific madrones also had a higher degree             in meadows provides a better environment
   of foliar fungal infection when adjacent to             for establishing seedlings to compete
   the meadows, compared to forest                         against meadow vegetation (Lubetkin et al.
   individuals. This higher prevalence and                 2017). In addition, decreased winter rainfall
   severity of foliar fungal infection can be              provides a longer growing season for
   attributed to higher humidity and seasonal              conifer and madrone seedlings to take
   meadow streams spreading foliar fungal                  advantage of the lower water content in
   spores, as these fungal spores spread via               meadows (Lubetkin et al. 2017). These
   water and wind (Elliott 1995). However,                 factors could contribute to meadow
   drier climatic conditions may decrease the              encroachment if current climatic models
   transmission of fungal infections between               are accurate in their predictions of
   individuals, resulting in reduced mortality in          increased annual temperatures (Lubetkin et
   Pacific madrone at the edges of meadows                 al. 2017). These findings emphasize the
   (Elliot 1995).                                          possible ecological threats arising from
     Pacific madrone’s ability to physiologically          species interactions that can enable conifer
   respond to environmental pressures could                encroachment, resulting in ecosystem shifts
   be a driver of conifer encroachment.                    and the loss of meadow biodiversity as
   Studies have shown that hardwood tree                   global climate change progresses.
   species, like Pacific madrones, show a
   positive correlation between thicker leaves             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
   and water deficits, as thicker leaves provide
   a defense against desiccation (Mitchell et al.            We thank Dr. Krikor Andonian, Dr. Renske
   2008; Burquez 1987; Ogaya and Penuelas                  Kirchholtes, and Robert Blenk for their
   2006). This response increases madrone’s                mentorship, patience, and encouragement.
   survival at the edges of meadows, and                   This work was performed at the University
   mycorrhizal associations provided by the                of California’s Angelo Coast Range Reserve,
   madrone can enable conifer establishment                doi:10.21973/N3R94R.
   into meadows (Amaranthus and Perry
                                                           REFERENCES
   1988). These mycorrhizal associations
   facilitate nutrient retention between                   Amaranthus, M. P., and D. A. Perry. 1989. Interaction
   coniferous seedling roots and soil,                      effects of vegetation type and Pacific madrone soil
   benefiting seedling growth and health                    inocula on survival, growth, and mycorrhiza
                                                            formation of Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of
   (Amaranthus and Perry 1988).
                                                            Forest Research 19:550–556.
     While madrone seedlings might be able to
   tolerate the regularly saturated soil                   Arno, S. F., and G. E. Gruell. 1986. Douglas-fir
   conditions of meadows, they are less likely               encroachment into mountain grasslands in
   to persist and thrive in high water content               southwestern Montana. Journal of Range
                                                             Management 39:272.
   environments (McDonald 1990). Decreased
   survival can be attributed to increased                 Búrquez, A. 1987. Leaf thickness and water deficit in
   fungal infections and root rot that increase              plants: a tool for field studies. Journal of
   tree mortality (Elliott 1995). However,                   Experimental Botany 38:109–114.
   decreased precipitation and water content

             |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44        Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                             5/6
Elliot,M.1999a. Diseases of Pacific madrone. In:               Lubetkin, K. C., A. L. Westerling, and L. M. Kueppers.
      Adams AB, Hamilton CW, editors. The decline of                2017. Data from: Climate and landscape drive the
      Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii Pursh): Current            pace and pattern of conifer encroachment into
      theory and research directions. Proceedings of the            subalpine              meadows.               Dryad.
      April 28, 1995 Symposium. Seattle (WA): Center for            https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.f4k16
      Urban Horticulture, University of Washington; pp.
      48–60.                                                      Mitchell, P. J., E. J. Veneklaas, H. Lambers, and S. S.
                                                                   O. Burgess. 2008. Leaf water relations during
   Haugo, R. D., and C. B. Halpern. 2007. Vegetation               summer water deficit: differential responses in
     responses to conifer encroachment in a western                turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure
     Cascade meadow: a chronosequence approach.                    among different plant communities in south-
     Canadian Journal of Botany 85:285–298.                        western Australia. Plant, Cell & Environment
                                                                   31:1791–1802.
   Hughes, T. F., J. C. Tappeiner, and M. Newton. 1990.
     Relationship of Pacific madrone sprout growth to             Ogaya, R., and J. Penuelas. 2006. Contrasting foliar
     productivity of Douglas-fir seedlings and                      responses to drought in Quercus ilex and Phillyrea
     understory vegetation. Western Journal of Applied              latifolia. Biologia Plantarum 50:373–382.
     Forestry 5:20–24.
                                                                  Zald, H. S. J., T. A. Spies, M. Huso, and D. Gatziolis.
                                                                    2012. Climatic, landform, microtopographic, and
                                                                    overstory canopy controls of tree invasion in a
                                                                    subalpine meadow landscape, Oregon Cascades,
                                                                    USA.      Landscape        Ecology   27:1197–1212.

              |
CEC Research https://doi.org/10.21973/N3SH44               Spring 2021 Vol. 3, Issue 3                               6/6
You can also read