Population ecology of the Three-toed Woodpecker under varying food supplies by Philippe Fayt

Page created by Leroy Nunez
 
CONTINUE READING
Population ecology of the Three-toed Woodpecker under varying food supplies by Philippe Fayt
University of Joensuu, PhD Dissertations in Biology

                      No:21

           Population ecology
     of the Three-toed Woodpecker
      under varying food supplies

                       by
                 Philippe Fayt

                      Joensuu
                       2003
The ancient Forest. All that lives here, lives not next to each other, but rather with each other. In
 this community everything submits to influence, and imposes its influence on the environment. A
               splendid, harmonised symphony of power, health and immortality.

                                                                             Jan Walencik (2000)

Front cover drawing:
The star of the book (© Philippe Fayt)
Fayt, Philippe
Population ecology of the Three-toed Woodpecker under varying food supplies. – University
of Joensuu, 2003, 126 pp.
University of Joensuu, PhD Dissertations in Biology, n:o X. ISSN 1457-2486

ISBN 952-458-384-4

Keywords: Breeding density, body size, brood size, heterogeneity, Fennoscandia, food supply, natal dispersal,
Picoides tridactylus, parental care, population dynamics, predatory impact, resource phenology, scale

In this study, ecological factors underlying multi-scale variability in the productivity and
abundance of the Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus were studied in Fennoscandia
from 1996-1999. Patch suitability for a resident woodpecker was estimated in relation to
seasonal and inter-annual changes in prey availability and profitability. The methods used to
clarify dietary preferences and sample prey populations included bark sampling and insect
trapping with window-flight traps. The information on dispersal patterns comes from ringing
data records. The results suggest that food supply, determined by the annual timing of prey
development and prey abundance, and its variability in time and space are key factors in
understanding individual responses and population processes in the woodpecker.
   In agreement with previous studies of factors limiting forest bird populations, I found the
woodpecker breeding density and success to depend on different food resources. While
annual variation in breeding density paralleled variation in the bird’s autumn-winter food
supply, the spruce bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae), brood size was related to the amount of
profitable longhorn beetle larvae (Col., Cerambycidae), the nestling’s main food. Different
patterns of annual changes in the abundance of the woodpecker’s autumn-winter and summer
food supply between burnt and old-growth patches emphasised the importance of patch
disturbance history for its suitability as a woodpecker habitat.
   The management level of a forest landscape was found to influence the spatial distribution
of bark beetle species diversity and abundance within its inclusive old-growth habitat units,
depending on whether a patch was surrounded by ditched clear-cuts or untouched peatlands.
In particular, with a lower spruce bark beetle abundance at the edges of old forest remnants in
drained managed landscapes compared to patches in swampy environment, my results provide
explanation for the importance of swamp forests for the woodpecker winter survival and
subsequent breeding density.
   In Finland, juvenile woodpeckers dispersed from their natal habitats at times of sudden
changes in the spatial distribution of insect prey as part of their development, leading to a
local decline in prey availability. The results suggest that prey availability, whose timing is
mediated by the timing of prey development, has a proximate effect on the propensity of the
juveniles to disperse, although a causal relationship was not found.
   Although a speculative conclusion, annual trends in natal dispersal rate in relation to spring
temperature incline me to propose that the yearly number of dispersers from a population
depends on its productivity, which, in turn, depends on how closely reproducing individuals
are able to match breeding time with annual pattern of food supply. The importance of the
juveniles for the population dynamics of conifer bark beetles is acknowledged, depending on
the numbers of woodpeckers dispersing over the landscape when beetle larvae reach a
profitable size. The possibility that the juveniles might disperse at different times from
regions with contrasting temperature conditions is discussed, as a result of spatial
heterogeneity in resource phenology.

Philippe Fayt, Department of Biology, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, FIN-80101
Joensuu, Finland
CONTENTS

LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS

1. INTRODUCTION                               9

2. THE STUDY                                 10
   2.1. Aims                                 10
   2.2. Predictions                          11
   2.3. Why?                                 11

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS                      12
   3.1. Study species                        12
   3.2. Study areas                          14
   3.3. General methods                      14
      3.3.1. The woodpecker data             14
         3.3.1.1. Reproduction               15
         3.3.1.2. Dispersal patterns         15
      3.3.2. The insect prey data            16
         3.3.2.1. Prey abundance             16
         3.3.2.2. Prey profitability         17

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                    17
   4.1. Diet preferences                     17
   4.2. Breeding density                     18
   4.3. Breeding performance                 18
   4.4. Parental care                        20
   4.5. Natal dispersal                      20
   4.6. Body size and dispersal patterns     21
   4.7. Predatory impact                     22
   4.8. Habitat suitability                  23

5. CONCLUDING REMARKS                        24
   5.1. Food supply and population ecology   24
   5.2. Management implications              25

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                             28

REFERENCES                                   29
LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS

This thesis is based on the following articles, referred to in the text by their Roman numerals
I-VII:

I      Fayt, P. 1999. Available insect prey in bark patches selected by the Three-toed
       Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus prior to reproduction. Ornis Fennica 76: 135-140.

II     Fayt, P. 2003. Time of natal dispersal and reproductive decisions of the Three-toed
       Woodpecker under varying food conditions. – In: Pechacek, P. and d’Oleire-
       Oltmanns, W. (eds.), International Woodpecker Symposium. Forschungsbericht 48.
       Nationalparkverwaltung Berchtesgaden, pp. 35-48.

III    Fayt, P. Brood size determinants of the Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus in
       boreal forests. Manuscript (submitted).

IV     Fayt, P. Dispersal patterns of Three-toed Woodpeckers in relation to food availability:
       consequences for the population dynamics of the woodpecker at the scale of
       Fennoscandia. Manuscript.

V      Fayt, P., Machmer, M.M. and Steeger, C. Regulation of conifer bark beetles by
       woodpeckers - a literature review. Manuscript (submitted).

VI     Fayt, P. 2003. Insect population changes in habitats with declining vs. stable Three-
       toed Woodpecker populations. Ornis Fennica 80 (in press).

VII    Fayt, P. 2003. Old-growth boreal forests, three-toed woodpeckers and saproxylic
       beetles – the importance of landscape management history on local consumer-resource
       dynamics. Ecological Bulletins 51 (in press).

Some unpublished results are also presented.
1. INTRODUCTION                                      outcome of social interactions within and
                                                     between species (Henderson and Hart
Understanding of the factors limiting bird           1995, Sutherland 1996). Partially reduced
populations has always been a challenging            food supplies explain interference between
and exciting field of interest among                 foraging individuals (Dolman 1995,
population biologists. Its difficulty arises         Cresswell 1998), which promotes the
from the multiplicity of factors and scales          dispersal of juveniles as a result of
that influence the key parameters of                 adjustments in dominance hierarchies
population dynamics: survival, dispersal,            (Lundberg 1985, Hannon et al. 1987).
and reproduction. Its implications are               Food supply influences indirectly the
crucial,     since    only     a     thorough        predation rate, for example at nest sites,
understanding of variability in individual           depending on alternative prey availability,
numbers is likely to provide meaningful              the landscape context and the predator
guidelines for population management                 community (Schmiegelow and Mönkkönen
(Marzluff et al. 2000).                              2002). Food level and general habitat
    Main factors related to changes in bird          quality also affects the magnitude of
numbers and distribution include food-               critical trade-offs in birds, for example
supply,      inter-     and     intra-specific       between reproductive effort and health
competition, predation, and parasitism               condition (Wiehn 1997), mate choice
(Newton 1998). Among these, food has an              (Alatalo et al. 1986), parental care
overwhelming influence on the major life             (Hakkarainen and Korpimäki 1994) and
history traits of individuals and population         the evolution of reproductive strategies
processes, and it controls directly or               (e.g., Korpimäki 1988).
indirectly the effects of other factors                 As a general pattern, food is a
(Newton 1980, Martin 1987). For example,             fluctuating resource, changing in space and
it has been shown that food availability in          time in a predictable or unpredictable way
autumn and winter-time determines local              (Dempster and Pollard 1981). In the
variations in subsequent breeding density            Northern Hemisphere, food supply
by influencing the survival and recruitment          changes annually in parallel to predictable
of juveniles into populations (Perrins 1966,         variation in photoperiod and ambient
Van Balen 1980, Hannon et al. 1987,                  temperature. The most spectacular
Nilsson 1987). In spring, food supply                consequence of this is probably the
affects laying date and thereby clutch size          evolution of bird migration over continents
in those species in which there is a                 (Gauthreaux 1985). Nevertheless, on
seasonal decline in clutch size, as                  smaller spatial scales, variation in food
demonstrated by food supplementation                 distribution, quality, abundance, and
experiments (Martin 1987, Daan et al.                profitability is also a reality, although not
1988). Laying time, in turn, determines              as obvious.
fledging success (Smith 1993, Verboven                  Heterogeneity is a natural and multi-
and Visser 1998), and environmental                  scale feature of forested habitats
conditions experienced during ontogeny               (Kuuluvainen 2002). It involves the fact
affect fitness-related traits such as clutch         that forest habitats are spatially variable in
size (Haywood and Perrins 1992) and body             terms of resources available for a living
size (Sedinger et al. 1995) of the surviving         bird, whether heterogeneity is viewed at
individuals. In migrating species, the pre-          branch, tree, or stand level. For instance, it
breeding nutritional condition of the                is now well established that the nutritional
parents affects reproductive success                 properties of host plants may differ
(Sandberg and Moore 1996). Spatial                   tremendously among and within tree
distribution and abundance of food                   species (Tikkanen 2000). This has direct
resources, on the other hand, influence the          implications for the fitness, abundance,

                                                 9
and population dynamics of herbivorous                population     processes     to    habitat
insects but also of their associated                  heterogeneity at local level, but also on
predators, parasites, and pathogens (Van              larger scales.
Balen 1973, Sipura 1999). Similarly,
lichen mass show a strong positive                    2. THE STUDY
relationship to mass, diameter and age of
branches (Esseen et al. 1996). Lichen                 2.1. Aims
abundance, on the other hand, determines
the number and biomass of invertebrates               In this thesis, my aim is to study the
and spiders, which in turn make up the                ecological factors underlying variability in
main food source of numerous foliage                  the seasonal and inter-annual abundance of
gleaning passerine birds (Pettersson et al.           the Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides
1995, Pettersson 1996). Below ground                  tridactylus at patch, landscape, and
level, heterogeneity in soil properties may           regional levels in Fennoscandia. More
also contribute to forest structure, for              specifically, I investigate whether (1) food
example by predisposing trees to pathogen             supply, in terms of both availability and
infestations on root tips, subsequent beetle          profitability, determines the breeding
attacks and early mortality (Hertert et al.           density, reproductive output, population
1975, Fraedrich and Tainter 1989).                    dynamics, and predatory impact of the
   Although such tree-scale biotic                    woodpecker (I-V), and (2) how patch and
interactions (so called bottom-up control;            landscape silvicultural history may
Lertzman and Fall 1998) are clearly seen              influence the outcome of the predator-prey
as a source of multi-scale ecological                 relationships (VI-VII). The information is
patterns, forest structural features are,             then combined to develop forest
however, also to a large extent determined            management guidelines that take into
by factors operating and interacting on               account the preservation of the species.
larger      scales,        namely      abiotic            First (I), I clarify the diet preferences of
environmental and allogenic disturbances              the bird prior to reproduction, after taking
(or top-down control) (Kuuluvainen 2002).             bark samples from recent foraging trees.
Landscape       charateristics     such     as        Then (II, III, IV), I relate seasonal and
topography, soil, hydrology, climate, or              inter-annual variation in prey development
land use determine the composition and                timing and availability among patches to
physiognomy         (i.e.,     the     spatial        the reproductive output and dispersal
arrangement) of its inclusive habitat                 patterns of the woodpecker. In particular, I
patches (Dunning et al. 1992). Variation in           test for the hypothesis that prey life cycle
the structure and abiotic conditions of               induces changes in food profitability,
forest landscapes, for their part, set the            which, together with prey abundance,
limits of microclimatic variability among             serves as a predictable cue for assessing
patches and determine their likelihood of             the benefits of investment in reproduction,
being disturbed at regular intervals by               and explains the onset of the woodpecker’s
physical agents. The importance of multi-             natal dispersal. In the next paper (V), a
scale interactions in determining forest              literature review allows me to test for the
structure is furthermore emphasised by the            idea that predatory woodpeckers, and
possibility of disturbance propagation and            especially Three-toed Woodpeckers, can
amplification from tree to landscape levels,          contribute to the natural regulation of their
for example during insect outbreaks                   prey. In the sixth paper (VI), I compare the
(Rykiel et al. 1988). Thus, when studying             short-term effects of fire vs. gap-dynamics
various effects of food supply on forest              on woodpecker abundance and its food
bird populations, careful attention should            supply. Finally (VII), I study whether the
be paid to relating individual responses and          conservation value of forest patches for a

                                                 10
resident woodpecker is landscape specific               5. Local prey availability should decline
by relating prey distribution to edge                at the time when young woodpeckers
proximity in old-growth patches with                 disperse across landscapes.
natural (unditched peatland) vs. managed                6. Earlier-dispersing juveniles should be
(ditched clear-cuts) surroundings.                   larger than later-dispersing birds, as a
   The thesis is based on circumstantial             result of higher food supply availability
evidence that food availability limits               among early broods.
woodpecker numbers, leading to testable                 7. Juvenile woodpeckers should
hypotheses. The available evidence falls             disperse first from warmer areas.
into two categories: (a) patch differences in           8. The Three-toed Woodpecker should
food correlated with patch differences in            have a stabilising effect on the population
bird numbers (II, III, V); and (b) seasonal          dynamics of its prey.
and annual differences in food correlated
with seasonal and annual differences in              2.3. Why?
bird numbers (II, IV, VI). For
convenience, in this study, a patch is               There are multiple reasons for choosing the
defined as a focal unit of a forest landscape        Three-toed Woodpecker as a study species
that is set off from surrounding habitats by         and woodpeckers in general as a group of
an ecologically meaningful edge (Fagan et            interest.
al. 1999). Prey availability is an attribute            1. The year-round diet preferences of
of the habitat and refers to the absolute            the species are well known, and sampling
amount of food available to a foraging               of the insect prey is relatively easy. This
woodpecker. Prey profitability takes into            allows for testing hypotheses relative to the
account the temperature-dependent timing             importance of food supply on bird
of prey development in relation to the               population dynamics.
woodpecker breeding cycle.                              2. The Three-toed Woodpecker is a prey
                                                     specialist, depending the whole year round
2.2. Predictions                                     on insect preys that colonise dying and
                                                     recently dead trees. This makes the
On the basis of the literature, sets of              woodpecker a species particularly sensitive
predictions are generated across the                 to forest management and the consequent
different papers, linking food supply to             removal of dead trees. Accordingly, the
woodpecker individual and population                 Three-toed Woodpecker is a declining
responses. These predictions can be                  species over most of its range, in parallel
summarised as follows:                               to fragmentation and loss of naturally
   1. The autumn-winter food supply                  dynamic forest habitats (Rassi 2000). In
should control woodpecker breeding                   Finland, the Three-toed Woodpecker is
density.                                             included in the list of the Wild Birds
   2. Both the availability and profitability        Directive of the European Union (i.e., a list
of nestling food supply should explain               of species for which every effort should be
breeding time and thereby brood size                 made to avoid reducing their population
among reproducing individuals.                       size or range due to human-related
   3. Mean brood size should be larger in            activities). It is also classified as a Finnish
years with a warmer spring if laying date is         responsibility species of European
related to the time of prey development.             Conservation Concern, since >10% of its
   4. The reproductive output of a                   European population breeds in the country
population should determine the number of            (Rajasärkkä 1997). Yet, although the
dispersing juveniles.                                negative impact of forest management
                                                     practices on saproxylic invertebrate
                                                     communities has been increasingly studied

                                                11
(Siitonen 2001), its potential cascading           Woodpecker has a reduced hallux instead
effects on the reproduction, survival and          of a distinct fourth zygodactyl toe as in
recruitment of predatory woodpeckers are           Dendrocopos species. Typically, it inhabits
poorly understood.                                 mature boreal or montane coniferous
   3. Because of its highly specialised            forests, with a distribution that coincides
requirements for properties characterising         with that of spruce tree species Picea spp.
naturally dynamic forest patches and               (Baldwin 1968, Bock and Bock 1974). In
landscapes, the Three-toed Woodpecker is           the whole Eurasian region, the total
an appropriate indicator of forest habitat         number of subspecies is five (P. t. albidior,
quality (Angelstam 1998, Nilsson et al.            alpinus,        crissoleucus,        funebris,
2001). In addition, the role of woodpeckers        tridactylus). In Europe, the Three-toed
in general as umbrella species and key             Woodpecker population is subdivided into
actors in forest animal communities by             two subspecies. While the nominal form P.
providing cavities for secondary cavity-           t. tridactylus is limited to the boreal forest
nesters is increasingly acknowledged               of Fennoscandia and Western Russia, the
(Martikainen et al. 1998, Martin and Eadie         sub-species P. t. alpinus is found in the
1999, Mikusinski et al. 2001).                     mountainous areas of Central, Eastern and
   4. From a behavioural perspective,              South-East Europe, mainly the Czech
woodpeckers share unique features among            Republic, France, Germany, Greece,
birds. In contrast to most altricial bird          Poland, Slovakia, and Switzerland
species, the males generally take a larger         (Winkler et al. 1995). In North America,
share in parental care than the females            three different subspecies are described,
(Winkler et al. 1995). Besides their               namely P. t. bacatus, P. t. dorsalis, and P.
peculiar habits of excavating cavities both        t. fasciatus. Based the supposition on
for reproduction and for roosting, the             mitochondrial gene tree from world-wide
males incubate and brood by night and part         the representatives of the genus, the New
of the day, which seems to preclude multi-         World Picoides may have evolved from
nest polygynous mating and under some              several Eurasian invasions (Weibel and
circumstances promote the rare multi-nest          Moore 2002).
polyandry (Willimont et al. 1991,                      The Three-toed Woodpecker is
Wiktander et al. 2000). Additional                 everywhere a rare species (Goggans et al.
observations of co-operative breeding in           1989, Tucker and Heath 1994). Occasional
some of the species confirm the adaptive           observations of local aggregations in forest
and puzzling nature of their sex-specific          areas recently disturbed by fire (Sorvari
reproductive strategies (Stacey and Bock           1994, Murphy and Lehnhausen 1998,
1978, Stacey and Koenig 1984).                     Imbeau et al. 1999), water (Yeager 1955),
                                                   wind (Virkkala et al. 1991), and/or infested
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS                            by phytophagous insects (Baldwin 1960,
                                                   Koplin 1972, Crockett and Hansley 1978)
3.1. Study species                                 suggest that its population size is limited
                                                   by habitat/food resources hardly found
The Three-toed Woodpecker is the only              under conventional forest management
woodpecker to be found in both the Old             (Imbeau et al. 1999). Accordingly, results
and New Worlds (Winkler et al. 1995)               from analyses of stomach contents show
(although recent molecular investigations          that they prey the whole year round on
suggest that a separate species exists on          insects that colonise dying and recently
each continent; Zink et al. 2002). As its          dead trees (i.e., with firm bark coverage).
name suggests, and together with the north         From late summer to early spring, they
american    Black-backed     Woodpecker            prey almost exclusively on conifer bark
Picoides    arcticus,   the    Three-toed          beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae), with a

                                              12
marked preferences for the species that                                         In this study carried out in Finland, clutch
colonise spruce trees (Hutchison 1951,                                          size varied between 2 and 5 eggs (3.35 ±
Dement’ev 1966, Hogstad 1970, Koplin                                            0.94, n = 26). The fledglings leave the nest
and Baldwin 1970, Koplin 1972, Massey                                           in June-July; they start to disperse from
and Wygant 1973, Pechacek and Krištín                                           their natal habitats mainly from August to
1993). Three-toed woodpeckers, on the                                           November        (Fig.   1).     Like    most
other hand, have been shown to ignore                                           woodpeckers, the Three-toed Woodpecker
very small spruce bark beetle larvae,                                           is primarily a resident species throughout
younger than 31/2 to 4 months of age                                            its breeding range (Burdett and Niemi
(Koplin and Baldwin 1970). During the                                           2002). Nevertheless, evidence for large-
summer months, however, wood-boring                                             scale irruptions exist on both continents
beetle larvae, and especially longhorn                                          (Yunick 1985; Fig. 2). As is the case for
beetle larvae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae),                                       other irruptive bird species, the majority of
contribute significantly to the diet of                                         the dispersing individuals are juveniles
individuals,        including       nestlings                                   (e.g., Perrins 1966, Hildén 1982; Fig. 2).
(Dement’ev 1966, Hogstad 1970, Pechacek
and Krištín 1996, P. Pechacek and A.
                                                                                                                       juvenile (1 calendar year old)
Krištín, pers. comm.). Such a seasonal                                                                        4
                                                                                                                       adult (> 1 cy)
variation in diet preferences coincides with
                                                                                                                                                   Finland
seasonal changes in habitat use for prey                                                                      3
searching. While wintering individuals
preferentially forage in pure spruce stands,
                                                                                                              2
                                                                              No. of dispersing individuals

late spring-summer birds select stands with
a larger deciduous component and forage
on more decayed trees (Wesolowski &                                                                           1

Tomialojc 1986, Hogstad 1991, Pechacek
and Krištín 1996, D. Nowak, pers. comm.).                                                                     0
    The Three-toed Woodpecker starts                                                                          4
reproducing the first year following birth
(i.e., in its second calendar year) (P. Fayt,                                                                                                      Sweden
                                                                                                              3
pers. obs.). It lays between 2 and 6 eggs in
May-June in a newly excavated cavity
(Dement’ev 1966, Wesolowski and                                                                               2

Tomialojc 1986).
                                                                                                              1
                  60
No. of captures

                                                                                                              0
                  40                                      Finland                                             1970   1975   1980    1985    1990   1995   2000
                                                          Sweden
                                                                                                                                   Period
                  20                                                            Figure 2. Number of juveniles and adults
                                                                                dispersing in Finland and Sweden (1973-
                                                                                2000). The annual number of dispersers
                   0
                       Aug.   Sep.   Oct.   Nov.   Dec.    Jan.   Feb.          was related to the total number of fully-
                                       Period
                                                                                grown birds ringed each year in each
                                                                                country and expressed as the number of
Figure 1. Natal dispersal period of the                                         woodpeckers per 10,000 birds ringed.
Three-toed Woodpecker in Finland and
Sweden (1973-2000).                                                                The woodpecker’s main insect prey (the
                                                                                bark beetles and longhorn beetles) share

                                                                         13
similar life-histories: they both attack             Monochamus sp.) borers, spend a part of
recently dead trees, they both benefit from          their larval stage inside the sapwood
thick, moist phloem (a thin layer of living          (xylem) after a first period spent in the
tree tissue found between the outer bark             phloem (Post 1984, Bílý and Mehl 1989).
and sapwood), and they both emerge as                Such wood-boring activity of larvae into
adults from brood trees for only a brief             the sapwood prior to pupation does not
period (Powell 2000). Bark and wood-                 begin before late August-September of the
boring      beetles    undergo      complete         beetle's first season (Rose 1957, Post 1984,
metamorphosis, developing successively               Bílý and Mehl 1989).
into larvae (an early soft-bodied form                  During this study, the main difficulties
without wing pads), pupae (a quiescent               encountered in the field were: (1) the rarity
soft form with wing pads), and adults                of the species and its low breeding density
(hard-bodied with an external exoskeleton;           in     apparently      “optimal”     habitats
Stark, 1982). Their life cycle includes three        (1pair/about 70 ha of old-growth conifer
phases (Stark 1982). The first is the                forest), (2) the low detectability of the
process of colonisation in early to mid-             species outside the normal periods of
summer, when beetles invade trees before             drumming activities, and (3) the limited
they start to reproduce. The second is a             prospection capabilities under spring snow
reproduction phase, which includes                   conditions.
mating,      oviposition,     and      brood
development up to the time of emergence.             3.2. Study areas
The third is a natal dispersal phase. As for
other ectothermic organisms, ambient                 The data on woodpecker breeding
temperature has a major influence upon the           parameters and food supply presented in
duration and timing of the different phases          this thesis were collected between 1996
of development of the insect prey (Annila            and 1999 in North Karelia, easternmost
1969, Salonen 1973, Post 1984). Beetle               Finland (63°N, 31°E). The study area
emergence or timing of natal dispersal               consisted of a patchwork of eight Norway
depends on the time of reproduction                  spruce-dominated old-growth stands and
(Annila 1969). In addition, the length of            one Scots pine-dominated Pinus sylvestris
the life cycle depends on the species of             stand burnt over in 1992. Among the eight
beetle and factors such as moisture content          old-growth habitat patches, five were
of tree tissues and density of conspecifics          surrounded by ditched clear-cuts and three
(Post 1984).                                         were surrounded by untouched peatlands.
   Several traits, however, distinguish bark         As a result, the patches were spatially
and longhorn beetles. Bark beetles are               isolated from the others. The shortest
small (< 6 mm in length) but very                    distance between two patches was 500 m,
numerous, and densely aggregated in the              and the longest 66 km. Each patch (65-90
phloem (Powell 2000). Conifer bark                   ha) was annually inhabited by a single pair
beetles do not enter the sapwood of the tree         of Three-toed Woodpeckers, except in
and remain inside the bark, where they go            1996 when a second pair was found
through their development. Emerging                  breeding just outside the burnt area, while
beetles then leave their brood trees from            using it as a foraging area.
August to November, prior to hibernation                The information on dispersal patterns of
(e.g., Annila 1969). By contrast, the wood-          Three-toed Woodpeckers originates from
boring beetles can be much larger (up to 50          bird ringing activities carried out between
mm) but less numerous and less clumped               1973 and 2000 in Finland and Sweden.
than bark beetles (Powell 2000). Longhorn
beetles, whether shallow (e.g., Tetropium            3.3. General methods
sp., Rhagium sp.) or deep (e.g.,

                                                14
3.3.1. The woodpecker data                            identified as different birds when they
                                                      were observed in forest stands a year
3.3.1.1. Reproduction                                 before the capture of the second calendar
                                                      year individuals, or after the occurrence of
Fast drumming is used as a long-range                 colour-ringed residents (II, III, VI).
territorial signal early in the morning. It is           Based on 6 hours per nest (with 2
performed by both sexes during the spring,            consecutive hours’ observation per day
mainly from March to May, but also in late            during the two last weeks of the rearing
summer-early autumn (P. Fayt, unpubl.).               period), parental effort was estimated from
Patch occupancy was annually checked by               the feeding frequency per hour and per
listening for drumming activities under               nestling. Attention was paid to counting
natural conditions (without playback                  the number of wood-boring beetle larvae
induction). Nests were then actively sought           delivered (e.g., longhorn beetle). The diet
from early May onwards all over the                   of the offspring was identified and
woodpecker habitats. They were annually               quantified by using spotting scopes (II).
located by nest-excavation noises in early               In order to relate local woodpecker
morning, by accidental discovery, usually             reproductive output to ambient temperature
after the discovery of fresh wood chips on            conditions, mean brood size was measured
the forest floor, and by the noisy                    annually from the same five habitat
vocalisations of the offspring.                       patches and related to the mean air
    Breeding time was estimated from the              temperature recorded during the preceding
fledging date instead of from the laying              winter (November-March) and spring
date, by backward calculation from the                (April-May).      Winter      and      spring
date of fledging, to control for between-             temperatures in the study area were
pair variation in the length of the                   estimated by taking an average of the
incubation and rearing periods. Fledging              monthly mean temperatures measured
date corresponded to the number of days               from the nearby weather station of Lieksa
from the 1st of June to the fledging day.             Lampela (63°19’N, 30°03’E) (III).
Nests were visited daily once a nestling                 To see whether interspecific pressure
was seen extending its head from the                  may contribute to explain a significant part
cavity to beg for food; fledging was                  of the variation in the reproductive
considered to have taken place when the               performances of resident Three-toed
first nestling had left the nest (II, III).           Woodpeckers, I measured the breeding
    To determine the brood size of the                density and mean brood size of Great
woodpeckers it was necessary to climb the             spotted Woodpeckers Picoides major
nest tree with metal shoes and use a small            reproducing in the same habitat patch as a
mirror and flashlight to investigate the              pair of Three-toed Woodpeckers. The
cavity. If the nestling count was uncertain,          methods of finding nests and counting
the tree cavities were revisited during the           nestlings were the same as those used for
following days. To avoid repeated brood               Three-toed Woodpeckers (III).
size measurements from the same females,
woodpeckers were individually colour-                 3.3.1.2. Dispersal patterns
ringed whenever it was possible. A total of
10 breeding females and 12 breeding males             Higher numbers of juvenile woodpeckers
were trapped and colour-ringed. The birds             would be expected to disperse in autumns
were captured after they entered the nest             following warmer springs in the case that
cavity to feed the offspring by placing a             temperature-dependent profitability of
plastic tunnel prolonged by a hoop net in             insect prey is a factor explaining fitness
front of the nest hole. In addition, males            variation   among     individuals    (IV).
and females that could not be trapped were            Accordingly, spring temperature (April-

                                                 15
May) in Finland was annually related to             Finland and Sweden, on the basis of
the following autumn number of dispersing           additional information available from the
juveniles and to the winter population              ringing records of the Swedish Museum of
density of the woodpecker (1973-1999).              Natural History. Together with capture
The spring temperature throughout the               coordinates and biometry, the yearly
country was estimated by taking an                  number of birds dispersing in Sweden was
average of the monthly mean temperatures            compared to the yearly number of
measured from six weather stations; two             dispersers in Finland. Woodpecker counts
stations were situated in southern Finland          in Sweden were related to the total number
(61°N, 22°-28°E), two in central Finland            of fully-grown birds ringed each year, as in
(63°N, 23°-30°E) and two in northern                Finland.
Finland (65°N, 26°-29°E). The yearly
spring air temperature was calculated by            3.3.2. The insect prey data
taking an average of the monthly mean
temperatures recorded from the six                  In this thesis, habitat suitability for a
weather stations. The annual number of              Three-toed Woodpecker was defined as a
dispersing woodpeckers was estimated                function of available food supply, in terms
from the ringing data records of the                of abundance throughout the year and
Finnish Museum of Natural History.                  profitability in relation to reproductive
Importantly,     juveniles    were    only          activities.
considered as dispersing individuals when
they were captured in localities known not          3.3.2.1. Prey abundance
to be breeding grounds of the woodpecker.
Because the number of woodpeckers                   Window-flight traps, a reliable sampling
captured every autumn might be connected            device for bark beetles (Martikainen et al.
with the ringing activity effort, counts            1996, 1999), were used as the sampling
were made comparable by relating them to            method to estimate local food abundance
the total number of fully grown birds               within patches. A sampling effort of 1 trap
ringed each year and expressed as the               per 7 ha was assumed to allow a
number of woodpeckers per 10,000 birds              representative sampling of the patchily
ringed. Winter density was estimated by             distributed forest beetles. Traps were
dividing the yearly number of individuals           located after choosing their direction and
observed during the early- (01. – 14.11),           distance from the centre of sample plots
mid- (25.12 – 07.01) and late- (21.02 –             from random number combinations. The
06.03) census periods of the national               yearly sampling period was 1 May–20
winter bird count (1975-99) with the total          July, covering the main flying season for
length of census routes and transformed             the beetles. Overall, ten traps were
into a population index.                            distributed all over each woodpecker
   To investigate whether juveniles                 habitat patch; they were emptied twice
dispersed earlier from regions with an              during the summer. During the whole
earlier prey development, the capture               study period, insect populations were
coordinates of dispersing juveniles were            sampled in about 1,590 ha of naturally
related to isotherms connecting points              dynamic forest habitats. Catches from
where a mean temperature of 5°C is                  window traps yielded altogether 19,251
measured at different times in spring (i.e.,        individual beetles, which included 14,262
the temperature threshold when the                  bark beetles (74.1%) from 31 species (III,
woodpecker prey start moving and                    VI, VII). Estimates of prey abundance
developing again after hibernation).                included the number of individual beetles
   Patterns of woodpecker dispersal in              of all the families, the number of bark
space and time were compared between                beetles, the number of individual bark

                                               16
beetles of the species that specifically live        adults)). On the basis of the sequential
on spruce, the number of individual wood-            order of the beetles’ development stages
boring beetles (including the families               (egg-larva-pupa-adult), an index of
Elateridae,     Anobidae,     Oedemeridae,           development for the spruce bark beetle
Cerambycidae, Curculionidae), the number             community was built up by dividing the
of longhorn beetles, and the number of               number of adult beetles of the different
bark and longhorn beetle species. Scolytids          species by the number of larvae collected
were classified as species living on spruce          during the reproduction, post-reproduction,
according to the species assemblage found            and natal dispersal periods of the
from the bark of spruce trees selected by            woodpecker. Accordingly, it was assumed
the woodpecker (I, II, VI). In paper VII,            that the earlier and/or faster the prey
bark beetle species were categorised                 community         reproduction      and/or
according     to    whether     they     live        development is, the more adults and fewer
preferentially on standing dead trees or on          bark beetle larvae should be collected and
logs, roots and stumps, as indicators of             the higher the index should be. This
spatial variation in the distribution of             method also assumed that the development
suitable woody microhabitats.                        time of the bark beetle community should
                                                     reflect the timing of development and
3.3.2.2. Prey profitability                          thereby the size-dependent profitability of
                                                     alternative prey, such as longhorn beetle
To clarify the diet preferences of the               larvae (II, III).
woodpecker, to link prey profitability to
reproductive decisions, and to relate prey           4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
availability to natal dispersal, bark samples
from spruce trees bearing recent Three-              4.1. Diet preferences
toed Woodpecker foraging tracks were
collected during the pre-reproduction,               In paper I, I looked at the insect content of
reproduction, post-reproduction, and natal           the bark of trees selected by foraging
dispersal periods of the bird (I, II, III).          Three-toed Woodpeckers. Bark samples
The first period coincided with late winter          were taken from March to May, although
and ended with the start of nest excavation;         most samples were collected in the first
the subsequent reproduction period lasted            two months. In agreement with earlier
until fledging. The natal-dispersal period           results from the Northern Hemisphere,
was defined on the basis of information              whether from stomach or dropping
provided by ringing records (the dispersal           analyses,     I found       the     predatory
time of young woodpeckers at the habitat             woodpecker to have particularly narrow
level was thus inferred from information             dietary requirements outside the breeding
gathered at the landscape level). The post-          season. Some 89% of the samples
reproduction period was then considered to           originated from spruce trees, and 96.9% of
be the time between fledging and natal               the insect prey collected were bark beetles.
dispersal. In order to minimise the multiple         Interestingly, 78.5% of the adult bark
effects of tree host conditions on the               beetles belonged to species previously
spatial distribution of beetle communities           found to respond negatively to forest edge
on trunks, the samples (10x15 cm) were               proximity by withdrawing into the interior
collected exclusively from standing trees,           parts of forest stands. This led me to
at breast height.                                    suppose that Three-toed Woodpeckers may
   A total of 355 bark samples were                  suffer from lower winter foraging
collected, yielding 10,343 individual bark           efficiency in a fragmented mature spruce
beetles (3,768 larvae, 950 pupae, and 5,625          forest landscape, if the proportion of
adults (including juveniles and sub-                 interior forest decreases.

                                                17
4.2. Breeding density                                   In paper II, I found that woodpecker
                                                     starting breeding earlier in habitats with
In paper VI, the hypothesis that the                 fewer bark beetle larvae and with more
autumn-winter food supply of the                     adult beetles sampled throughout the
woodpecker (the spruce bark beetles)                 season. In accordance with the above
control the subsequent woodpecker                    assumption, it is suggested that
breeding density was examined by                     woodpeckers nested earlier in forest
comparing the pattern of annual changes in           habitats where the beetles reproduced
prey abundance between forest habitats               earlier and/or development was faster, and
(burnt vs. old-growth) differing in                  the beetles emerged earlier. Brood size, in
disturbance history (accidental fire vs.             turn, was inversely related to the number
regular small-scale gap dynamics created             of spruce bark beetle larvae and pupae. Or,
by wind and tree-scale biotic interactions)          conversely, brood size was larger in forest
and the woodpeckers’ numerical responses             patches with more adult beetles. Thus,
to habitat change (decreasing vs. stable). In        because the woodpecker bred earlier in
a forest patch burnt in 1992, where the              habitats with more adults and fewer beetle
burned trees remained in the area to allow           larvae, a seasonal decline was observed in
for natural development of the vegetation,           woodpecker brood size, as is found in
a decline in the woodpecker breeding                 other woodpecker species and single-
population paralleled a progressive                  brooded birds in general (e.g., Wiktander
reduction in spruce bark beetle availability.        1998).
Neither the total number of individual                  In paper III, besides the effect of
beetles, the number of individual bark- and          breeding time, I found patch-level
wood-boring beetles, nor the number of               variation in the woodpecker brood size to
bark and longhorn beetle species showed              be explained by the timing of bark beetle
significant    trends    after    fire.    In        development and the number of bark and
neighbouring old-growth patches, on the              longhorn beetle species, which were inter-
other hand, where one pair of woodpeckers            correlated. Numbers of both beetle species,
bred annually, the abundance of spruce               in turn, were strongly positively correlated
bark beetles did not change significantly            with the abundance of longhorn beetles.
between years, although it differed among            The breeding density and success of
patches. My results suggest that the                 coexisting Great spotted Woodpeckers did
woodpecker breeding population is limited            not influence the Three-toed Woodpecker
by the level of food available outside the           productivity. Neither were they correlated
breeding season, as shown for other forest           with various estimates of animal food
bird populations (Perrins 1966, Van Balen            supply.
1980, Hannon et al. 1987, Nilsson 1987).                Thus, Three-toed Woodpeckers were
                                                     found to lay clutches earlier and to rear
4.3. Breeding performance                            larger broods in patches where the spruce
                                                     bark beetles developed earlier, where the
In papers II and III, I studied the effect of        bark and longhorn beetle communities
prey profitability (based on the timing of           were more diverse, and where longhorn
their development) on reproductive                   beetles were more abundant. Assuming a
decisions in Three-toed Woodpeckers,                 higher size-dependent profitability of
without taking into account and with                 longhorn beetle larvae in patches with
taking into account the potential effects of         early bark beetle development, it is
confounding factors such as breeding time,           proposed that brood size in the Three-toed
food abundance and level of interspecific            Woodpecker depends on both abundance
pressure for available food resources,               and phenology of Cerambycid beetle
respectively.                                        larvae in relation to the bird breeding

                                                18
covered a relatively short period of time (4
                                                                                 years), the results would provide additional
                       3,5
                                                                                 evidence for the key impact of prey
                       3,0                                                       profitability at the time of egg laying on
dispersal rate
Autumn natal

                       2,5                                                       the bird’s reproductive decisions. The
                       2,0
                                                                                 results led to the prediction that the
                       1,5
                       1,0
                                                                                 number        of     dispersing      juvenile
                       0,5                                                       woodpeckers should increase with the
                       0,0                                                       mean temperature of the preceding spring
                                                                                 (IV). In Finland, however, autumn
Early winter density

                       300
                                                                                 captures of juvenile woodpeckers and the
   (01. - 14.11)

                       200                                                       subsequent winter population size did not
                                                                                 increase with the spring temperature
                       100                                                       conditions. Instead, woodpecker numbers
                                                                                 seemed to reach a maximum following
                         0                                                       springs with a monthly mean temperature
                       400                                                       of 4-6°C, although a considerable inter-
Mid-winter density

                                                                                 annual variation was apparent (Fig. 3).
 (25.12 - 07.01)

                       300
                                                                                    Although this is a speculative proposal,
                       200
                                                                                 I suggest that this pattern is a result of the
                       100                                                       decisions of breeding individuals to adjust
                                                                                 their heritable breeding date to the
                        0
                                                                                 development time of their prey, with
                       300
                                                                                 special reference to longhorn beetle larvae,
Late winter density
  (21.02 - 06.03)

                                                                                 in an attempt to match breeding time and
                       200
                                                                                 nestling food profitability under variable
                                                                                 food abundance level.
                       100

                         0
                             1       2    3    4     5    6    7        8                          H ig h p r e y a b u n d a n c e
                                 Spring monthly mean temperature (°C)

Figure 3. Rate of natal dispersal (1973-
                                                                                   Fitness

1999) and winter population size (1975-
1999) of the Three-toed Woodpecker in
Finland as a function of monthly mean                                                             L o w p re y a b u n d a n c e
temperature of the preceding spring
(April-May).
                                                                                             C h a n g e in p r e y p r o f ita b ility
                                                                                       E a r ly                                      L a te
cycle. This conclusion is in line with                                            (T s > 4 -6 °C )                              (T s < 4 -6 °C )
earlier findings, that productivity in birds
is largely determined by the amount of
food available to nestlings (e.g., Siikamäki                                     Figure 4. Predicted fitness variation in
1995).                                                                           breeding Three-toed Woodpeckers with
   Like other woodpecker species that feed                                       changing prey profitability (development
on bark- and wood-living arthropods                                              time) under contrasting prey abundance.
(Hogstad and Stenberg 1997, Pasinelli                                            Ts is the spring monthly mean T°.
1999), the mean brood size of the Three-
toed Woodpecker increased with spring                                            Only with a monthly temperature of 4-6°
ambient temperature. Although the study                                          in spring (April-May) (i.e., the temperature

                                                                            19
threshold when bark-living saproxylic               4.5. Natal dispersal
beetles such as bark beetles restart moving
and developing after hibernation) would             In paper II, I investigated whether the
the parents be able to match breeding time          onset of natal dispersal in the Three-toed
with food supply and to maximise their              Woodpecker is related to change in prey
lifetime reproductive success. Even in the          availability. To do so, I compared the
case of optimal timing of prey                      abundance of bark beetles living in spruce
development, however, food supply would             trees in relation to the woodpecker
also depend on prey abundance,                      breeding cycle, after taking bark samples.
accounting for between-year variation in            The dispersal period was inferred from
reproductive output and dispersal rate (Fig.        information gathered at landscape level,
4).                                                 from ringing data files.
                                                       Besides a synchronous development of
4.4. Parental care                                  the different beetle species, I found young
                                                    woodpeckers to disperse in Finland and
In paper II, nestlings from earlier/larger          Sweden at the time when the abundance of
broods were found to receive more wood-             the bark beetles in my study area (Eastern
boring beetle larvae than those from                Finland) was lower than during the
later/smaller broods. Since the feeding rate        preceding spring, in the reproductive and
did not change with breeding time and               post-reproductive periods. Since a similar
brood size, I suggest that, in line with            number of adult beetles was present in the
previous results, a seasonal decline in             bark during the post-reproductive and the
wood-boring larva delivery rate is rather           dispersal periods of the bird, despite a peak
caused by habitat-related differences in the        in the number of juveniles and sub-adults
supply of the beetle larvae at the time of          among the different species of beetles
brood rearing than by differential                  during the former period, this apparent
adjustment in parental effort between early         reduction in food level seemed to result
and late breeders. Similarly, Hogstad and           from the dispersal of synchronously-
Stenberg (1997) found White-backed                  developed beetle species within the habitat.
Woodpeckers Picoides leucotos to breed              This is consistent with earlier results from
earlier, lay larger clutches and produce            studies dealing with the population
heavier fledglings in years and places with         ecology of bark beetles under boreal
warmer winter and early spring                      conditions, showing that the newly-formed
temperatures (and thus with the earliest            beetles leave their brood trees from late
prey development). They also found that             August to November, prior to hibernation
pairs breeding in warmer places (with a             (Chararas 1962, Annila 1969). In addition,
shorter winter period) brought more wood-           a review of the existing literature on the
boring larvae for their young compared to           ecology of longhorn beetle larvae revealed
pairs from colder places, despite similar           simultaneous changes in their availability,
feeding rates between the pairs from both           due to gallery excavation deeper inside the
areas. As a result, fledglings were found to        wood from the phloem, before pupation.
be the heaviest in the warmest habitats in             These findings would suggest that a
spring. The heaviest fledglings were also           sudden change in the spatial distribution of
the most likely to be recruited                     insect prey, whose timing is mediated by
subsequently into the local population, a           the timing of the prey development, may
finding in agreement with the previously            temporarily lower their availability for
found association between body size and             foraging woodpeckers and promote the
survival among juvenile birds (e.g., van            dispersal of young individuals. The
der Jeugd and Larsson 1988, Brinkhof et             dispersal time of juvenile birds, on the
al. 1997).                                          other hand, is known to affect their own

                                               20
lifetime     reproductive     success     and,        or regions should be, on average, smaller
therefore, also that of their parents                 than those coming from warmer habitats,
(Verboven and Visser 1998, Visser and                 as shown with White-backed Woodpeckers
Verboven 1999). This prompts me to                    (Hogstad and Stenberg 1997).
propose that, by using the profitability of              In Finland, earlier-dispersing juvenile
prey at the time of egg-laying for the fine-          males and females were, on average,
tuning of their reproductive decisions,               longer-winged than their later-dispersing
female Three-toed Woodpeckers behave in               counterparts. Wing length, in turn, is
a way that allows them to optimise their              positively correlated with bill length
inclusive fitness.                                    (Hogstad 1983). Body weight, on the other
    Nevertheless, although my data                    hand, did not follow any linear seasonal
emphasised coincidence between change in              trends, although an existing inter-
the spatial distribution of insect prey and           correlation between weight and wing
the assumed onset of woodpecker natal                 length of male and female nestlings (P.
dispersal, this study suffered from the               Fayt, unpulb.) suggested that this
absence of statistical verification that these        discrepancy is a result of the limited
two phenomena are causally related. This              sample size. In Sweden however, contrary
was due to the lack of direct field                   to the prediction, the body size of the
observations that young woodpeckers                   dispersers did not decrease with capture
effectively dispersed at times of changes in          date. Instead, some of the juvenile males
prey availability. My results are therefore           and females were found to be the heaviest
non-conclusive.                                       and have the longest wings in the middle
                                                      of September, while earlier- and later-
4.6. Body size and dispersal patterns                 dispersing individuals were smaller. One
                                                      explanation for this could be the arrival in
In altricial birds, there is evidence that            mid-September of larger individuals
fledgling size is related to hatch date (e.g.,        originating from Finland, as is suggested
Alatalo and Lundberg 1986, Brinkhof et al.            by the dispersal patterns of juveniles on
1997), and that late-hatched individuals in           both sides of the Baltic Sea.
a population disperse and search for vacant              Regarding the dispersal patterns of
habitats later than do birds from early               juveniles in relation to capture date, most
broods (Pinowsky 1965). This explains the             individuals dispersing during the first half
general finding that early dispersers are             of the dispersal period (August-September)
larger than late-dispersing juveniles                 were captured at the northernmost ringing
(Nilsson and Smith 1985, Hogstad 1990,                stations in Finland and Sweden (63-65ºN)
Lens and Dhondt 1994). In paper IV, I                 while, from early October onwards,
examined the prediction that earlier-                 juveniles were mostly captured in the
dispersing        juvenile         Three-toed         southern parts of the countries (58-60ºN).
Woodpeckers from a population should be               Such a pattern would contradict the earlier
larger     than     later-dispersing    ones,         stated prediction, that juveniles from
presumably as a result of higher delivery             warmer regions should disperse before
rate of wood-boring larvae in earlier                 those originating from colder northern
broods. In addition, if change in food                regions.
availability promotes dispersal among                    Alternatively, one would expect early
juveniles, and if such a change is related to         birds from warmer regions preferentially to
the life cycle of the prey, woodpeckers               follow a northern direction, in order to
would be expected to disperse first from              benefit from the still available developing
warmer areas (i.e., regions with earlier              bark and wood-boring beetles hatched a
dates for the 5ºC isotherm in spring). Thus,          year before. Only then would the later
individuals dispersing from colder habitats           dispersers from colder regions fly

                                                 21
southwards, to profit from the newly               response to prey density, with population
growing bark beetle larvae. This is because        densities increasing up to 44.8-fold during
spruce bark beetle larvae younger than 31/2        infestations, relative to those supported at
to 4 months of age are ignored by foraging         endemic beetle levels. Furthermore,
Three-toed Woodpeckers (Koplin and                 comparison of beetle mortality inside and
Baldwin 1970), presumably being too                outside        woodpecker           exclosures
small to be profitable. A consequence of           demonstrated the potential of woodpeckers
this would be the capture of the earlier-          to reduce up to 98% of spruce bark beetles
dispersing     individuals   in    northern        populations, depending on prey density
Fennoscandia, despite their southern               and whether a study took the indirect
origin, from warmer regions.                       effects of predator feeding (desiccation,
   Interestingly, the finding that seasonal        parasitism, predation) into consideration.
variation in capture location coincided               The      review      highlights      several
with simultaneous increases in the                 ecological factors that are associated with
woodpecker average body size suggest the           the predatory impact of the woodpeckers
possible occurrence of several somewhat            and its variability. The population response
partially differentiated populations in            of woodpeckers to prey density and
Fennoscandia. As discussed elsewhere               predatory impact was a function of (1) the
(Dhondt et al. 1990, Blondel et al. 1993,          woodpecker natal dispersal rate and
Blondel et al. 1999, Thomas et al. 2001),          success, (2) the size-mediated profitability
predictable climatic variability across            of the bark beetle larvae at the time the
landscapes and presumed limited dispersal          bird is dispersing through the infestation,
(and thus gene flow) are pointed out as            (3) limitations imposed by territoriality at
potential factors in promoting the                 the highest prey densities, (4) seasonal
evolution of those populations, by local           variation in the caloric content of insect
adaptations of breeding adults to their            prey and the metabolic rate and consequent
environment. For comparison, in Finland,           food requirements of woodpecker species,
genetic diversity of isolated small                and (5) stand-level factors that are related
populations of the Siberian Jay, another           to site-specific silvicultural practices.
old-growth coniferous taiga forest dweller,           This allows me to propose a general
has recently been found to be lower than           mechanistic framework that accounts for
that of populations in continuous                  variation in the predatory impact of
distribution areas (Uimaniemi et al. 2000).        woodpeckers on spruce bark beetles.
This was apparently attributable to low            Overall, it stresses the close relationship
intrinsic natal dispersal capabilities in          between the multi-scale heterogeneity of
fragmented forest landscapes.                      forested habitat, driven by succession and
                                                   disturbance patterns in space and time,
4.7. Predatory impact                              predator-prey        population      processes
                                                   operating at landscape levels, and local
In paper V, a literature review of case            consumer-resource dynamics.
studies from the northern hemisphere                  Interestingly, in habitat patches where
revealed that, among woodpeckers preying           Three-toed          Woodpeckers           were
on conifer bark beetles, the Three-toed            continuously present, the abundance level
Woodpecker was the most responsive to              of spruce bark beetles did not change
prey population changes. In comparison to          significantly     between       years     (VI).
other guild members (namely the Downy              Conversely, the number of bark beetles of
Picoides pubescens, the Black-backed, P.           the species on which the woodpecker does
arcticus and the Hairy Woodpeckers P.              not prey (i.e., mainly Hylastes and
villosus), the Three-toed Woodpecker was           Trypodendron spp.) showed significant
found to show the greatest numerical               annual fluctuations. This result, although

                                              22
preliminary, suggests a stabilising role of          time, due to differences in vulnerability
the woodpeckers on the population                    (location, length of exposure) to predation
dynamics of their prey. In accordance with           under high woodpecker density.
this supposition, lower beetle populations
with more stable dynamics are expected in                              Autumn-winter food supply
                                                                                    Breeding density
forest patches where the predatory

                                                     Prey abundance
woodpeckers are regular or year-round                                                                Burnt forest
visitors than in patches where the
woodpeckers are rarely seen.                                                             Nestling food supply
                                                                                                Brood size
4.8. Habitat suitability

In papers VI and VII, I studied bark and
wood-boring beetle population responses                                          Time after fire
to patch- and landscape-level management
history, as a prerequisite for developing
meaningful management plans for the
Three-toed Woodpecker.
                                                     Prey abundance                           Old-growth forest
   In paper VI, I compared the short-term
effects of accidental fire vs. regular small
gap-dynamics on the woodpecker’s                                      Autumn-winter food supply
abundance and its food supply. After fire,                                Breeding density

unlike the case of spruce bark beetles (the
autumn-winter prey whose abundance                                                    Nestling food supply
                                                                                             Brood size
declined through the years in parallel to the
woodpecker breeding population), the                                                  Time
abundance of longhorn beetles (the
nestling     food     supply)      increased         Figure 5. Illustrated annual changes in
progressively in parallel to the bird’s              autumn-winter (spruce bark beetles) and
reproductive output. By contrast, in old-            summer (longhorn beetle larvae) food
growth habitats, the continuous production           supply of Three-toed Woodpeckers in burnt
of heterogeneity in forest structure allowed         vs. old-growth patches, with implications
stable woodpecker-prey relationships, both           for woodpecker breeding density and
in summer and in wintertime (Fig. 5).                reproductive output.
    Hence, this study shows that a patch
suitable for a wintering Three-toed                     In paper VII, I found the management
Woodpecker is not necessarily suitable for           history of a forest landscape to influence
a reproducing individual, and vice versa.            the spatial distribution of bark beetles
This is because the bird’s dietary                   within its inclusive old-growth habitat
requirements change seasonally, with                 units. Spruce bark beetle abundance was
autumn-winter      and      summer       prey        found to be lower at the edges of old-
responding differently to changing                   growth remnants in drained managed
heterogeneity.     Alternatively,     basing         forest landscapes compared to patches
suppositions on the preceding results                embedded in a swampy untouched
connecting the population dynamics of                environment. Also, while the number of
conifer bark beetles with that of their avian        bark beetle species did not change with
predators (V), it may be suggested that the          distance from the edge in swamp forests,
contrasting population trends of bark and            the number did increase from the edge into
wood-boring beetles after fire result from           the interior part of remnants surrounded by
different mortality patterns in space and            ditched     clear-cuts.   Comparing     the

                                                23
You can also read