Q1 2021 RESULTS TELECONFERENCE
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENTS Matters discussed in this release may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance and may include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and statements other than statements of historical facts. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “plan,” “potential,” “may,” “should,” “expect,” “pending” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although the Company believes that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies that are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, the Company cannot guarantee that it will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of the world economy and currencies, general market conditions, including fluctuations in charter hire rates and vessel values, the duration and severity of the COVID-19, including its impact on the demand for petroleum products and the seaborne transportation thereof, the operations of our customers and our business in general, changes in demand for “ton-miles” of oil carried by oil tankers and changes in demand for tanker vessel capacity, the effect of changes in OPEC’s petroleum production levels and worldwide oil consumption and storage, changes in demand that may affect attitudes of time charterers to scheduled and unscheduled dry-docking, changes in TORM’s operating expenses, including bunker prices, dry-docking and insurance costs, changes in the regulation of shipping operations, including actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, domestic and international political conditions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events including “trade wars,” or acts by terrorists. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this release because they are statements about events that are not certain to occur as described or at all. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and actual results and future developments may vary materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, the Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. 2
TODAY’S PRESENTERS Jacob Meldgaard ▪ Executive Director of TORM plc ▪ CEO of TORM A/S since April 2010 ▪ Chairman of the Board of Danish Shipping and member of the Board of Danish Ship Finance ▪ Previously Executive Vice President of the Danish shipping company NORDEN, where he was in charge of the company’s dry cargo division ▪ Prior to that, he held various positions with J. Lauritzen and A.P. Moller-Maersk ▪ More than 30 years of shipping experience Kim Balle ▪ Chief Financial Officer of TORM A/S since December 2019 ▪ Previously CFO of CASA A/S and DLG ▪ Prior to that, he held various positions with Danske Bank ▪ More than 30 years of finance experience 3
Q1 2021 HIGHLIGHTS Q1 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS CORPORATE EVENTS Purchase of eight 2007-2012 built MR EBITDA of USD 18.9m TCE Q1 2021 of USD/day 13,493 Inproduct tanker early 2020, vessels TORM for a total refinanced USDcash 496m of consideration existing debt. of USD 82.5m and the issuance of 5.97 million shares Loss before tax of USD 21.1m MR TCE Q1 2021 of USD/day 12,935 In Q2 TORM refinanced USD 35m on five The cash vessels, element will postponing the be financed maturity fromwith 2021USD to 82m of new bank debt 2025. RoIC of -2.7% Q2 bookings of USD/day 14,821 In Q3 TORM refinanced USD 150m on eight vessels, postponing Purchase the maturity of three 2015-built to 2027,fitted scrubber providing additional financial flexibility LR2 vessels for a total cash consideration and of Earnings/ (loss) per share of USD -0.29 (DKK -1.8) USD 12m in USD 120.8m liquidity. The refinancing includes a CO2 emission-linked pricing mechanism aligned with will Financing IMO’s emission partly be banktarget debtfor and 2030 sales and lease structures Sold the older MR vessel TORM Carina Note: Adjusted net profit: Net profit adjusted for impairments, sales gains and provisions. 4
THE THREE LR2 PURCHASES BUILD ON TORM’S COVERAGE AND S&P STRATEGY OVER THE PAST YEAR MR freight rates, USD/day # Vessels on the water • TORM has actively managed the spot exposure in the recent volatile market development through coverage strategy as well as sales 80,000 and purchase activities: 76 78 78 73 72 73 80 (85 incl. NB) • Coverage strategy: • From Q2 2020 onwards, TORM 50,000 has had a strategic focus on increasing cover through both physical contracts and derivatives 20,000 • As of 07 May 2021, TORM has covered 78% of the Q2 earning days Dec- Feb- Apr- Jun- Aug- Oct- Dec- Feb- Apr- Jun- Aug- • Sales and purchase activities: 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 • During the market spike in the Coverage Primarily spot, opportunistic Increasing cover over period through TC-outs Increased cover to second quarter of 2020, TORM strategy cover and FFA’s run-off capitalized on the market and sold seven older vessels at attractive levels Sale of seven older S&P activities Opportunistic vessels to capitalize Opportunistic sales of older vessels and purchase of 11 Opportunistic • During the first months of 2021, fleet renewal younger vessels to increase operational leverage TORM has purchased 11 younger strong market vessels adding to TORM’s operational leverage and future performance Source: Clarksons. Spot earnings, MR average is basket of Rotterdam->NY, Bombay->Chiba, Mina Al Ahmadi->Rotterdam, Amsterdam->Lome, Houston->Rio de Janeiro, Singapore->Sydney. 5
DYNAMIC COVID-19 SITUATION CONTINUES TO AFFECT THE PRODUCT TANKER MARKET USD/day Q1 2021 190,000 • Renewed lockdowns in several regions LR2 (avg.) temporarily reversed oil demand MR (avg.) recovery and capped trade flows TORM MR (spot) • The extremely cold weather in mid- 90,000 February led to severe outages in the TORM MR covered Q2 2021 as of 7 May 2021 85,000 US Gulf refinery sector and 80,000 consequently boosted transatlantic flows 75,000 as well as East to West flows, bringing 70,000 US clean product imports to the highest 65,000 monthly level since 2010 • Despite LR2 clean-ups and high crude 60,000 cannibalization as a result of the weak 55,000 crude tanker market, LR2s were 50,000 supported by increased East to West 45,000 trade in March 40,000 35,000 Q2 2021 – to date 30,000 • East to West trade flows have eased from the spike in end-Q1 along with peak 25,000 refinery maintenance in Asia and 20,000 returned US supply 15,000 • Progressing vaccine rollout in the US 10,000 and Europe is supporting oil product 5,000 demand 0 • Increasing COVID-19 cases in Asia Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- (most notably in India) can potentially 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 lead to increased exports from the region Source: TORM, Clarksons. Spot earnings: LR2: average of Clarksons LR2 East combination (Ras Tanura->Chiba->Ulsan->Singapore) and East-West combination (Ulsan->Singapore->Mina Al Ahmadi->Rotterdam->Skikda->Chiba); MR: average basket of Rotterdam->NY, Bombay->Chiba, Mina Al Ahmadi->Rotterdam, Amsterdam->Lome, Houston->Rio de Janeiro, Singapore->Sydney. 6
THE OIL MARKET HAS MOVED FROM STOCKBUILDING TO STOCKDRAWING • The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented oil demand destruction Pre-COVID-19 • Initially, refinery runs lagged declines in demand, leading to unprecedented inventory builds bringing the onshore Refined product spare storage capacity to its limits stocks build • The demand started to recover, but weak refinery margins capped refinery runs, leading to stock draws Refined product stocks build • Increasing new COVID-19 cases especially in the West but also in Asia Refined product stocks draw led to a temporary reversal in the oil demand recovery in Q1 2021 • Vaccine rollouts are supporting recovery in oil demand, although local Apr 2021 increases in COVID-19 cases remain a Jan 2020 Apr 2020 Jul 2020 Oct 2020 Jan 2021 risk Oil product demand Refinery production Source: TORM. 7
OIL DEMAND IN CHINA HAS REBOUNDED, ILLUSTRATING THE POTENTIAL POST-COVID-19 SITUATION While the oil demand recovery in the West stalled on increased COVID-19 cases over the year-shift… Oil demand growth vs 2019, % • China’s oil demand (~14% of the Europe United States 10 10 global oil demand) has recovered 0 0 to pre-COVID-19 levels due to -4 -3 -4 -3 successful control of the virus -10 -10 -5 -8 -10 -10 -11 -10 -10 -10 -12 -8 -13 -14 -16 -13 -13 -15 -15 -13 -12 -13 -11 • India’s demand (~5% of the -20 -16 -20 -20 -19 global oil demand) has also done -30 -24 -30 -24 -28 -31 relatively well before the recent -40 -40 abrupt increase in COVID-19 -50 -50 cases Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug-Sep- Oct- Nov-Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 • The second wave of COVID-19 cases in especially Europe (~15% … the demand has shown comeback in China as well as in India before the recent surge in COVID of the global oil demand) but also cases. in the US (~20% of the global oil China India 10 5 6 6 10 demand) put a break on the oil 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 0 1 1 0 demand recovery, although the 0 0 -1 0 -1 -1 -3 well-progressing vaccine rollout in -3 -2 -4 -10 -8 -10 -8 the latter is already showing signs -11 of improvements in oil demand -20 -15 -20 -16 -15 -19 • Accelerating vaccine rollouts -30 -30 leading to a wider recovery in -32 -40 -40 macroeconomic activity and oil -45 demand, supporting both the -50 -50 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug-Sep- Oct- Nov-Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- product tanker and crude tanker 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 trades Note: March/April 2021 data are estimates. Source: WoodMackenzie, JBC, EIA, compiled by TORM. 8
TORM HAS IMPLEMENTED PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES IN INDIA WHERE THE COVID-19 DEVELOPMENT IS AFFECTING OIL DEMAND No of cases India new COVID cases 400,000 • The recent increase in COVID-19 cases in 300,000 India has caused TORM to implement 200,000 precautionary measures to safeguard both 100,000 the shore based staff and the seafarers 0 Jan- May- • The development poses operational 20 21 challenges as crew changes have become more difficult in the region and for Indian Index India mobility indicator seafarers. Further, vessels with recent port 200 calls in India have restrictions in certain 150 countries 100 • TORM is carefully monitoring the 50 development and expects to fully maintain 0 Jan- May- operations 20 21 • For the product tanker market, the India CPP exports and imports increase in COVID-19 cases have led to Kb/d Exports Imports new local lockdowns and reduced oil product demand 1,000 • So far, refineries in the country have 500 continued to run at elevated levels, which has resulted in higher daily clean product 0 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 exports Sources: Apple, Kpler, Our World in Data, TORM. May-21 data as per 5 May. 9
SUCCESSFUL VACCINE ROLLOUT IN THE US LEADING TO IMPROVED OIL DEMAND Weekly US Vehicle-Miles Travelled (VMT) vs 2019 respective week US Flight Traveler Throughput (7d avg) % All vehicles Passenger vehicles Trucks 2019 2020 2021 20 3,000,000 10 2,500,000 0 2,000,000 -10 -20 1,500,000 -30 1,000,000 -40 500,000 -50 -60 0 Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 • With ~60% of the adult population in the US having commenced vaccination, demand for core products (gasoline, jet fuel, diesel) in the US in April 2021 climbed to 5% below the 2019 seasonal level, up from -14% in January • Diesel demand (~20% of total demand) has recently showed strong gains vs 2019, while gasoline (~45% of total demand) still remains ~5-6% below the respective 2019 level • Although jet fuel demand has remained ~30% below the 2019 level, the US flight traveler throughput has improved in recent months to the levels last seen in mid- March 2020 (jet accounts for ~9% of US oil demand) • In late April, US Gulf refinery utilization climbed to above 90% for the first time since March 2020 Sources: EIA, US DOT, US TSA. 10
THE UNWINDING FLOATING STORAGE IS DONE, ONSHORE INVENTORIES SIMILARLY ON THE WAY DOWN Onshore CPP inventories in key trading hubs* and global CPP floating storage • Onshore CPP inventories in key Mln bbl Mln dwt trading hubs (~20% of global 90 16 Floating storage (RHS) stocks) have declined from the 15 peak of 15% above 5-year 80 Light distillate stocks (vs 2015-2019 avg) 14 average in June 2020 to 3% in 70 Middle distillate stocks (vs 2015-2019 avg) 13 the first months of 2021, 60 12 followed by a large decline in 11 stockpiles induced by the 50 10 refinery outages in the US Gulf 40 The effect of the 9 Polar Vortex as a result of the extremely cold 30 8 weather 7 20 6 • On a global scale, onshore 10 5 stockpiles are still above 0 4 historical levels but excess 3 stocks have come down to a -10 2 third of the peak levels in mid- -20 1 2020 -30 0 • Floating storage has come down Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 from 14% at the peak to 4% of the clean trading fleet, slightly above the pre-COVID-19 levels Note: Onshore inventories: based on weekly data for the US, Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) area and Singapore, and monthly/weekly data for Japan (the US accounts for 75-80% of the combined stockpiles). Shown countries/regions together account for around 20% of the global product stockpiles. Sources: EIA, PAJ, Reuters, WoodMackenzie, TORM. 11
COVID-19 HAS LED TO A NEW WAVE OF REFINERY CLOSURES, INCREASING TON-MILES IN THE MEDIUM- AND LONG-TERM Announced refinery closures and capacity additions in 2020-2023* 130 kb/d 116 kb/d 58 kb/d 55 kb/d 485 kb/d 220 kb/d 137 kb/d 335 kb/d 200 kb/d 80 kb/d 190 kb/d 235 kb/d 267 kb/d 1,030 kb/d 250 kb/d 200 kb/d 1,250 kb/d 110 kb/d 445 kb/d 690 kb/d 220 kb/d 80 kb/d 100 kb/d 30 kb/d 250 kb/d Planned closure 15 kb/d Closure under consideration 236 kb/d 109 kb/d New/expanded capacity 120 kb/d 110 kb/d 135 kb/d • 2.3 mb/d of refinery capacity has been announced to shut down in recent months, with another 1.0 mb/d under consideration • 3.3 mb/d of potential refinery closures compared to a global capacity expansion of 4.9 mb/d during 2020-2023 • Most of the capacity to be shut down is in the net importing regions, while new capacity comes online mainly in the Middle East and Asia, boding well for the ton-mile development in the medium and long term Note: Includes Total’s 100 kb/d Grandpruits refinery, Eni’s 80 kb/d Livorno refinery, and Phillips 66’s 120 kb/d Rodeo refinery which will be closed down temporarily in order to be converted into renewable fuel plants. Source: TORM, industry sources. 12
LOW TONNAGE SUPPLY GROWTH SUPPORTING MARKET RECOVERY The product tanker order book at a historical low level as % of the total fleet • The product tanker order 56 book to fleet ratio is at a historical low of 7% • This is supported by historically low crude tanker order book at 9% of the fleet, 37 which combined with returning OPEC barrels suggests less crude cannibalization in the 24 medium-/long-term 22 19 19 • Due to the recent record high 15 16 ordering activity in the 14 11 12 10 container vessels segment, 10 10 8 7 7 ordering of product tankers with delivery before 2024 has become more difficult. This will limit the fleet growth in 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5Y 10Y YTD avg. avg. 2022-2023 even further, in addition to already record low order book ratio Source: TORM. 13
TORM COMMERCIALLY OUTPERFORMS PEERS IN ITS KEY MR SEGMENT CORRESPONDING TO USD 12M IN Q1 2021 MR reported TCE, USD/day Q1 2021 performance: • TORM: USD/day 12,935 • Peer average: USD/day 10,337 TORM MR USD USD 14m USD 36m USD 20m USD 24m USD 39m premium* 12m Note: Peer group is based on Ardmore, d’Amico (composite of LR1, MR and Handy), Diamond S, Frontline 2012, Hafnia Tankers, NORDEN, Maersk Tankers, Teekay Tankers, Scorpio and International Seaways. For Q1 2021, the peer group only consists of Ardmore, d’Amico, Diamond S, International Seaways and Scorpio. Earning releases from other peers are pending. * TORM’s premium calculation is based on the individual quarters with those vessels in TORM’s MR fleet earning TORM’s TCE rate compared to the peer average. 14
TORM’S COMMERCIAL CAPABILITIES ARE FOCUSED ON OPTIMIZING GEOGRAPHICAL POSITIONING USD/day (%) 14,000 80 West outperformance Majority of TORM’s MRs west of Suez 12,000 10,000 70 8,000 6,000 60 4,000 2,000 0 50 -2,000 East outperformance Majority of TORM’s -4,000 MRs east of Suez 40 -6,000 -8,000 30 -10,000 -12,000 -14,000 20 Q1-17 Q3-17 Q1-18 Q3-18 Q1-19 Q3-19 Q1-20 Q3-20 Q1-21 TORM % of MRs positioned west of Suez (right axis) West premium of benchmark earnings* (left axis) * West premium calculated as spread between Atlantic triangulation (TC2 & TC14) and Transpacific voyage (TC10). Source: Clarksons, TORM. 15
INCREASED COVERAGE DE-RISK Q2 2021 RESULT Open earning days per segment as of 31 March 2021 28,903 29,246 4,189 4,211 3,093 3,234 LR2 14,236 LR1 1,599 689 MR 20,895 21,102 Handy 11,427 521 725 698 2021 2022 2023 Q2 2021 coverage USD/day Q1 2021 TCE per day Q2 2021 cover as of 7 May 2021* % of total days TCE per day LR2 16,455 112 15,781 LR1 14,750 87 14,781 MR 12,935 72 14,660 Handy 7,362 47 11,624 Total 13,493 78 14,821 * Part of the cover is conducted through freight derivatives using FFA for TC5 which is allocated according to owned vessels days to the LR1 and LR2 segments. In total TORM’s coverage for the 16 LR segments is at 100%
TORM USES FREIGHT DERIVATIVES TO OBTAIN ATTRACTIVE COVERAGE Freight derivatives* are a natural element of … and TORM has historically benefitted from the use of freight derivatives but M- TORM’s coverage strategy… t-M of unrealized element impacts TORM’s P&L statement ROY 2021 cover as of 31 March 2021 Historical P&L contribution from freight derivatives (USDm) 12.2 ROY covered days for 2021: 6,815 days 10.8 • FFAs: 2,765 days • Physical: 4,050 days 6.6 7.0 5.7 ROY covered rate for 2021: 14,982 USD/day 5.1 • FFAs: 14,358 USD/day 4.0 • Physical: 15,409 USD/day 0.9 1.8 1.1 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Q3 2020 Q4 2020 Q1 2021 Total Unrealized Total April 2021 Total 2020 realized end Q1 2020 and (realized and Jan. - 2021 Q1 2021 and Apr. 2021 unrealized) Notes: Before 2020, TORM did not use freight derivatives in meaningful size. As freight derivatives are not hedge accounted in TORMs financial statement, the unrealized element impacts the TCE. It is included in TORM’s coverage table, but as it relates to future rates, it does not impact the realized freight rates (TCE/day) for the quarter. * Freight derivatives includes FFAs and its associated bunker derivatives 17
NET ASSET VALUE ESTIMATED AT USD 788M WHILE NET LOAN-TO-VALUE OF JUST 55% 31 March 2021 figures, USDm Net LTV of 55% 1,705 858 788 210 22 13 117 Value of vessels Outstanding debt Committed Cash Working Capital Other* Net Asset Value (incl. newbuildings) CAPEX • Net Loan-to-Value was 55% • Net Asset Value (NAV) was estimated at USD 788m (USD 10.6/DKK 67.1 per share) • Market cap as of 31 March 2021 was USD 679m, or DKK 57.8 per share** • Market cap as of 7 May 2021 was USD 704m, or DKK 57.0 per share*** ** Other includes Other plant and operating equipment and total financial assets. ** Calculated based on 74,476,483 shares and USD/DKK FX rate of 6.34. *** Calculated based on 76,192,653 shares and USD/DKK FX rate of 6.17. 18
WELL-POSITIONED TO SERVICE FUTURE CAPEX COMMITMENTS AND FURTHER LEVERAGE MARKET OPPORTUNITIES Liquidity and CAPEX as of 31 March 2021 Available liquidity, USDm Cash CAPEX commitments, USDm Expected closed during Q2 2021 3x 2015-built LR2 Team Tankers1 Newbuildings incl. scrubber 446 24 92 329 Purchased during Q2 2021 76 276 92 121 121 155 117 45 116 38 86 86 48 69 69 69 Cash Available Team LR2 Total 2015-built Additional Total 2021 2022 Total CAPEX 3x 2015- Proforma position Working Tankers Newbuilding Available LR2 sale-and- Available as of Q1 2021 built LR2 CAPEX Capital Financing Financing Liquidity Financing leaseback Liquidity Facility (as of Q1 Financing (proforma) 2021) 1) Does not include the share-based consideration to Team Tankers of USD 55m 19
FAVORABLE FINANCING PROFILE WITH NO MAJOR NEAR- TERM MATURITIES Scheduled debt repayments as of 31 March 2021 USDm 849 10 69 16 Financial lease 144 92 16 Mortgage debt 92 13 90 55 705 72 33 289 Oustanding debt as ROY 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Hereafter of 31 March 20211 Ample headroom under our attractive covenant package: • Minimum liquidity: USD 45m • Minimum book equity ratio: 25% (adjusted for market value of vessels) 1) Financial lease excludes non-vessel related IFRS16 liabilities of USD 7.4m and is adjusted for loan receivables of USD 4.6m and debt repayment in connection with the sale of TORM Carina 20
You can also read