Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment

Page created by Jorge Barber
 
CONTINUE READING
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E.
ORSANCO Commissioner
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   Established 1948
   Authorized by Congress
   Eight signatory States (IL, IN, NY, KY, OH, PA, VA,
    WV)
   “Pledge cooperation” to abate interstate water
    pollution in Ohio River valley compact district
   Created ORSANCO to coordinate and implement
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   3/state (gubernatorial appointments); 3 federal
    (Presidential appointments)
   State EPA director ex-officio
   One federal is EPA Regional Administrator
   Budget: $2.5 million from states & USEPA
   Staff – 23
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   981 Miles from Pittsburgh to       38 power generating
    Cairo                               plants
   Drinking water source for 5
    million people (33 intakes)
   120+ species of fish; rich in
    mussels
   230 million tons of cargo
    transported annually; 20
    locks and dams
   Recreational water resource
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   Regulatory – establish Ohio River Pollution
    Control Standards
   Monitoring (lots of it) & assessment
   Spill Detection/Response (monitoring,
    communications)
   Clean Water Act/Safe Drinking Water Act
    implementation coordination (TMDLs, NPDES,
    etc…)
   Applied research (pharmaceuticals, mercury)
   Public Involvement programs (volunteer
    monitoring, River Sweep, mobile aquarium)
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   Referred to as 305(b) report
   ORSANCO completes for Ohio River.
   Recommendation for states’ 303(d) Lists of
    waters requiring TMDLs.
   Based on ORSANCO monitoring data.
   2012 Impairments
    ◦ All 981 miles impaired for PCBs and dioxin based on
      historical high volume water quality data.

    ◦ 630 miles impaired for contact recreational use based on
      exceedances of E. coli &/or fecal coliform criteria.

    ◦ Recent previous assessments have temperature and
      dissolved oxygen impairments in lower river.
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   Commission initiated study to characterize total
    dissolved solids (TDS) and its primary
    constituents in the Ohio River and selected
    tributaries.
   Weekly sampling conducted at 11 Ohio River
    sites and on 5 tributaries for a suite of
    parameters.
   Sampling effort ran for 1 year (Dec 2011 – Dec
    2012).
   Data assessment is ongoing.
   Final report to be completed June 2013.
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
Dissolved Solids Analytes        Supplemental Parameters

1.   Sodium      6.   Chloride      pH
2.   Potassium   7.   Sulfate       Conductivity
3.   Magnesium   8.   Bromide       Temperature
4.   Calcium     9.   Fluoride      Stream flow
5.   Lithium                        Coordinate THM
                                     sampling when possible

10. Bicarbonate
11. Total Dissolved Solids
Stuart F. Bruny, P.E. ORSANCO Commissioner - Ohio Water Environment
   Highest levels
               observed during
               low-flow period in
   TDS
Standard       Aug/Sept.
500 mg/L
              Levels on the Ohio
               River did not
               approach the 500
               mg/L standard
               (max observed 368
               mg/L)
              TDS was higher on
               tributaries,
               particularly the Big
               Sandy and
               Muskingum Rivers
ORSANCO and Water Resources

   Mission (per Compact) has been
    focused on water quality
   Growing importance of integrating
    quality and quantity management
   Droughts and shortages…not just a
    “west of the Mississippi” issue
    anymore
   2009 Strategic Planning Workshop
    ◦ Outcome: ORSANCO should become more
      “holistic” in its services to the states
   Committee Role:
    ◦ To study, discuss and evaluate water resources issues of
      concern or interest to the Commission and basin states
    ◦ Provides a forum for states and federal agencies to discuss
      water resources issues (meets 3 times annually)
    ◦ Current membership includes:
               States                         Federal
    Indiana         Kentucky        Tennessee Valley Authority
    New York        Ohio            US Army Corps of Engineers
    Pennsylvania    Tennessee       US Geological Survey
    Virginia        West Virginia

    ◦ Committee must be financially self-supporting
   Effort funded by private foundation grants
   Initial focus to complete three water resource
    characterization studies
    1.       Water resources inventory and characterization
             Characterize current water resources issues (i.e. water use, inter-
              basin transfers, climate change, E-flows)
    2.       Examination of laws and regulations
             Comparison of existing state and federal rules/regs governing
              water resources
    3.       Evaluation of Commission role in water resources
             management
             Define appropriate role for Commission and develop funding
              mechanism for future WR activities

   Timeline
    ◦ Reports #1 and #2 to be completed 2013
    ◦ Report #3 to be completed 2014
   Methyl Mercury fish tissue data was collected
    in hybrid striped bass samples.
   40% of samples exceeded ORSANCO’s MeHg
    fish tissue criterion of 0.3 mg/kg.
   Hybrid striped bass considered “worst case”
    scenario.
   ORSANCO’s Technical Committee decided
    river would remain “unassessed” until fish
    tissue data from other commonly consumed
    species was collected and evaluated.
   Some states have listed Ohio River for
    mercury impairments. OEPA does not include
    Ohio River in any listings.
   ORSANCO prohibition on mixing zones for
    bioaccumulative chemicals of concern
    (mercury).
   Effectively will require discharges to meet
    0.012 ug/L for total mercury at end of pipe.
   PPG requested and received a variance from
    this prohibition.
   Ironton has requested a variance from
    ORSANCO – has already received variance
    from OEPA.
   ORSANCO is developing formal variance
    procedure.
Objective:
•Project at Hannibal L&D in
area of mercury discharge
variance request by PPG
Inc. Natrium, WV mile 120

•A single site-specific
bioaccumulation factor for
methyl Hg

•Calculated from direct
measurement of methyl
mercury in water and
methyl mercury in tissue
   12 Equal Discharge Increment (EDI)
    composite water samples (1 year/Monthly)
    ◦ Analysis for total and methyl mercury, filtered and
      unfiltered
    ◦ Known methylation factors: DOC, D SO4,
      Chlorophyll-a
   12 composite fish tissue analyses:
    ◦ 4 TL4 composites
    ◦ 4 TL3 composites
    ◦ 4 TL2 composites
   4 sediment samples
Objectives:

   Create inventory of FGD systems and ash ponds
    on the Ohio River (FGD type, installation date,
    discharge location).

   Characterize total and methyl mercury discharges
    from FGD systems.

   Data will be used in conjunction with mercury
    trend analyses to investigate potential impacts
    from these discharges.
   Four sample events (quarterly) at four
    coal-fired power generation facilities

   Three sample locations per facility:
    ◦ Upstream baseline or raw inflow
    ◦ FGD wastewater post treatment
    ◦ Fly/bottom ash pond final discharge

   Analytical parameters to be monitored:
           •Filtered total Hg          •Bromide
           •Unfiltered total Hg        •Dissolved Organic Carbon
           •Filtered methyl Hg         •Dissolved Sulfate
           •Unfiltered methyl Hg       •Total Dissolved Solids
           •Selenium                   •pH/Specific Conductance
   2012 revisions of bacteria criteria for protection
    of recreational use.
    ◦ Fecal coliform criteria removed.
    ◦ Numeric E. coli criteria revised as follows:
    ◦ 130 cfu/100mL as 90-day geometric mean.
      Previously 30-day.
    ◦ 240 cfu/100mL in more than 25% of samples.
      Previously single sample max.
   Max. Temperature criterion of 110 deg F added
    for protection of human health from body
    contact exposure.
   USEPA Region 5 is completing a bacteria TMDL for
    the entire Ohio River.
   About 2/3 of the river is listed as impaired.
   ORSANCO has been involved:
    ◦ Monitoring to generate data to support the modeling effort.
    ◦ Provide technical expertise on the Ohio River.
    ◦ Collection of other necessary data.
   Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS model being
    utilized.
   There will be a continued public involvement
    process (one set of meetings held in 2009).
   See ORSANCO’s website for additional info.
   Fish Community 1957-present
   Macroinvertebrate Community 1964-present
   Fish Tissue Contaminants 1970-present
   Supplemental Data Collections
    ◦ Mussel Community 2012
    ◦ Periphyton Community 2007-2012
    ◦ Water & Sediment Chemistry 2007-present
   Mobile Aquarium Displays ~2001-present
   Lockchamber Rotenone 1957-2005
    ◦ Long term trends analysis

   Night-time Boat Electrofishing 1990-present
    ◦ Aquatic Life Use Assessments [305(b)]
      Uses Modified Ohio River Fish Index (mORFIn)
    ◦ Probabilistic Pool Surveys (15 sites/pool)
    ◦ 18 Riverwide Fixed Stations (sampled annually since 2004)

   Benthic Trawling 2006-2008
    ◦ Exploration as supplement to EF
   Collected at electrofishing sites
   Methods
    ◦ Rockbaskets 1964-1971
    ◦ Hester-Dendy (HD) 1968-present
      Shallow (2-3’ of water) & Deep (10’)
    ◦ D-Frame Net Kicks (Kicks) 2004-present
   Recently developed multi-metric index
    ◦ Uses combination of Deep HD & Kicks
   Draft numeric index has been developed and will
    be evaluated over the next couple years.
   Initial results seem to compare reasonably with
    fish surveys.
   Objectives:
    ◦ Monitor contaminants levels & track trends
    ◦ Provide information to states to support fish
      consumption advisories (www.orsanco.org/fca)
    ◦ Provide information for 305(b) assessment of Fish
      Consumption Use
   Analytes
    ◦   PCBs
    ◦   Mercury (total & methyl) & other metals
    ◦   DDTs, Chlordanes, and other pesticides
    ◦   PBDEs, PFCs, Dioxins, etc on occasion
   Fish tissue contaminants of concern include
    PCBs and mercury
   Mussel Community 2012
    ◦ Initial explorations for use as bio-indicators
   Periphyton Community 2007-2012
    ◦ Draft diatom multi-metric index recently completed
   Water & Sediment Chemistry 2007-present
    ◦ Used to create condition gradients for biotic data

        * All collected at electrofishing zones
   2200 Gallon Mobile Aquarium
   Set-up at various events along river
    ◦ Approximately 10-12 events April-October
   Filled at event with
    water & fish
    ◦ Generally 20-30 species
   In May 1977, the Commission voted to expand it’s
    monitoring capabilities to include volatile organics (VOC’s), in
    response to an ongoing Carbon Tetrachloride release into
    Kanawha River that February.
    ◦ 6 downstream water utilities were unprotected and vulnerable with no
      ability to detect volatile organics routinely; water quality was
      compromised and communities were served contaminated water for
      over a week.
   ODS is designed to be a Spills Detection Network.
   Samples collected from Ohio River at 14 drinking water
    utilities (one on Kanawha River).
   At least 1 source water sample is analyzed per day from each
    site.
    ◦ In 2012, nearly 4,200 VOC samples were collected from ODS
      locations and analyzed.
       Less than 2% of the time, reportable detections found–(that’s a good thing!)
    ◦ Most common detections are Chloroform, (THM’s), Benzene,
      1,1-Dichloroethylene, and TCE.
   Continued partnerships with water utilities, the
    Water Users Advisory Committee (WUAC), and
    industry has kept ODS operational for 34 years.
    ◦ In kind services provided by ODS host sites over the past
      two years totals over $1.4M.
   Operational and maintenance costs are estimated
    to be over $200,000 annually when renovation is
    completed.
   Methylene Chloride          1,3 Dichlorobenzene
   1,1 Dichloroethylene        1,4 Dichlorobenzene
   1,1 Dichloroethane          1,2 Dichlorobenzene
   Chloroform                  1,1,1 Trichloroethane
   Acrylonitrile               Carbon Tetrachloride
   1,2 Dichloroethane          Benzene
   trans-1,2 Dichloroethylene Trichloroethylene
   cis-1,3 Dichloropropene     1,2 Dichloropropane
   trans-1,3 Dichloropopene Dichlorobromomethane
   Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene Toluene
   1,1, 2,2 Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene
   1,1,2 Trichloroethane       Dibromochloromethane
   Trichlorofluoromethane      Ethylbenzene
   Napthalene                  Chlorobenzene
   Styrene (co-elutes with o,p xylenes)
   Bromoform
ODS MONITORING LOCATIONS

Water Utility
                        Early 90’s technology
GC/MS technology        CMS5000 process GC
   In 2008-2010 ORSANCO was able to obtain
    $4.4 Mil in funding to support a network wide
    renovation and upgrade. The Renovation will
    allow the ODS to:
    ◦ Use automated sample injection to increase
      frequency of analysis to 4-6 times daily
    ◦ Reduce analysis time
    ◦ Increase number of VOC’s that can be identified
    ◦ Increase number of monitoring sites
    ◦ Involve and educate public with interactive website
   Project began with Electric         Project Partners
    Power Research Institute             ◦   Electric Power Research Institute
    2008 feasibility study.              ◦   American Electric Power
    ◦ Power plants compliance cost       ◦   Duke Energy
      ranged from $20-180 per lb         ◦   Hoosier Energy
      of nitrogen                        ◦   Tennessee Valley Authority
                                         ◦   American Farmland Trust
    ◦ Typical farmer BMP cost $2-4       ◦   Ohio Farm Bureau Federation
      per lb                             ◦   ORSANCO
   Project funding to date              ◦   Hunton & Williams
    from project partners and            ◦   Kieser & Associates
    grants: $5 Million                   ◦   US EPA
                                         ◦
    Advisory groups from
                                             USDA

    Power Industry, Agriculture,
    WWTP’s, Environmental
    Groups.
    ◦ WWTP advisory group from
      NACWA
   An option for compliance with permit limits.
   A permitted source of nutrients with a high
    compliance cost pays a non-point source
    with a lower reduction cost to install nutrient
    best management practices.
   Non-point source reductions must be new.
Full Scale Program
38 Power plants
230,000 Farmers
Thousands of WWTP
Millions of Pounds of Nutrients
   Pilot phase will test out procedures developed
    for the program
   Pilot Trading Plan signed by Ohio EPA,
    Indiana DEP, Kentucky DEP August 9, 2012
   $100,000 will be spent on BMP’s in each
    State.
    ◦ Projects are currently being scoped
    ◦ Installation of BMP’s this spring/summer
    ◦ First credits for sale in September 2013
   Project will go full scale in 2015.
   Problem:
    ◦ Nutrients are one of the most common causes of
      impairments to water in the U.S.
    ◦ USEPA has directed all States to develop numeric
      nutrient criteria
   Objective:
    ◦ Collect a long term dataset for development of numeric
      nutrient criteria.
    ◦ Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)
      Some algae cause taste and odor problems with drinking
       water. These issues have become more common on the
       Ohio River.
      Some algae can produce toxins which are harmful to humans
       and animals.
   Parameters: total           7locations
    phosphorus,                 West View, PA ORM5
    nitrate/nitrite, TKN,       Wheeling , WV ORM87
    ammonia,
    phytoplankton algae         Huntington, WV
    identification,                  ORM306
    chlorophyll a.              Northern KY
   Frequency: 2/month.              ORM463
    12 months/year for          Louisville, KY
    nutrients. 9                     ORM600
    months/year for algae.      Evansville, IN
                                     ORM792
                                Paducah, KY
                                     ORM936
   EPA has mandated that states develop numeric
    nutrients criteria.
   Criteria development for the main stem of the Ohio
    River began in 2002.
   Development of numeric criteria have proved to be a
    difficult task.
   There are not obvious cause-effect relationships
    between concentrations of nutrients and impairments
    caused by nutrients.
   There are occasional algae blooms and drinking water
    taste & odor problems that are associated with
    nutrients.
   Continuing to look at other indicators such as
    changes in macroinvertebrate communities resulting
    from nutrients.
   Unknown as to when numeric criteria may be
    proposed.
You can also read