Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears

Page created by Gene Robbins
 
CONTINUE READING
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Advancements in Shoulder
    Arthroscopy: Large to
Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
                                  Detroit, MI
                                 July 30, 2021
   Shariff K. Bishai, D.O., M.S., FAOAO
                    Associated Orthopedists of Detroit, PC
           Sports Medicine, Shoulder Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy
Assistant Professor, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Assistant Professor, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
         Professor, Detroit Medical Center Sports Medicine Fellowship
Past-President, American Osteopathic Academy of Orthopedics Sports Section
           Past-President, Detroit Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery

                     Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Disclosures
 u   Paid Consultant
      u   DePuy Synthes, J&J

      u   Zimmer Biomet
      u   Stryker
      u   Arthrex
      u   Smith & Nephew
      u   Trice Medical

      u   BD
      u   Pacira
      u   RTI
      u   Xiros NA

      u   Anika Therapeutics
                                  •   Editoral Boards/Journal Reviewer
 u   Surgeon Advisory Boards           •    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (JSES), Reviewer
                                       •    Journal of Orthopaedic Experience and Innovation (JOEI), Editorial
      u   Mitek Sports Medicine             Board
                                           Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
                                                      Shoulder Pain

Ø United        States:
  u   4-6 Million People Per Year Seek
      Medical Attention

  u   1.5 Million Visits Per Year to
      Orthopaedic Surgeons

          Lehman RC: Shoulder pain in the competitive tennis player. Clin Sports Med. 7: 309-327, 1988.

                                                                                    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
                            Anatomy

Ø   Layer 1: Superficial fibers overlie the
    cuff, an extension of the CHL
Ø   Layer 2 and 3: Fibers of the rotator
    cuff
Ø   Layer 4: Deep extension of CHL
Ø   Layer 5: Joint capsule (Superior
    capsule)
                   Clark JM, Harryman DT II. JBJS 1992

                                      Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
Layer 5 – Superior Capsular Reconstruction

                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
                  Tear Patterns
Ø   Partial Thickness Tears
    u PASTA Lesion
    u PAINT Lesion

Ø   Full Thickness Tears
    u Small: Less than 1 cm
    u Medium: 1-3 cm

    u Large 3-5 cm

    u Massive: Greater than 5 cm

    u Irreparable
                         Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
                  Tear Patterns
Ø   Partial Thickness Tears
    u PASTA Lesion
    u PAINT Lesion

Ø   Full Thickness Tears
    u Small: Less than 1 cm
    u Medium: 1-3 cm

    u Large 3-5 cm

    u Massive: Greater than 5 cm

    u Irreparable
                         Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Rotator Cuff Disease
                   Defining the Tear

Ø Understanding    the Footprint
 u   Average maximum length of 23
     mm (range: 18 to 33 mm)

 u   Average maximum width of 16
     mm (range: 12 to 21 mm)

                   Curtis AS, Burbank KM, Tierney JJ, Scheller AD, Curran AR. The Instertional Footprint of the Rotator Cuff: An Anatomic Study. Arthroscopy
                   2006: 22 (6)603-609.

                                               Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: “Menu”

          Ø   Conservative
          Ø   Debride + tenotomy + rehab
          Ø   Partial repair
          Ø   Repair +/- ECM
              augmentation/scaffold/biologics
          Ø   ECM interposition (bridging)
          Ø   Superior capsule reconstruction
          Ø   Subacromial spacer
          Ø   Latissimus/lower trap transfer
          Ø   Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Advancements in Shoulder Arthroscopy: Large to Irreparable Rotator Cuff tears
Predictors of Rotator
Cuff Repair Success

 Ø 33 Patients with MRI at 2 years
   after repair
 Ø Goutallier Grade 2 to 3 with  15 mm and no
     fatty infiltration
     u
Imaging

Goutallier D, CORR 1994; 304: 78
                               Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Predictors of Rotator Cuff Repair Success

Peter Chalmers et al
• Predictions based on
  >2,500 patients and
  algorithm built on multiple
  studies

                            Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Age Affect Outcome?

 Ø   49 pts arthroscopic double row repair evaluated
     by US & clinical exam (6 mo-36 mo)
 Ø   25 tears healed on follow up (51%)
     u   67% if single-tendon
      u 36% if multiple tendon

 Ø   All VAS, Active FF, ASES, & Simple Shoulder
     test scores improved                                             2010, American Journal of Sports Medicine
 Ø   55.1 vs 63.3 yo; younger more likely to heal
 Ø   Multivariant analysis found only age at time of
     surgery and number of years at post-operative
     follow-up correlated with cuff healing

                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Age Affect Outcome?

Ø 120 pts, 87 underwent post-op MRI
Ø 67% healed
Ø Incidence of retear increased with
  age >60, size of initial tear, as well
  as increased fatty degeneration
    u   Despite structural failures, mean 25 month
        follow up showed excellent pain relief and
        ability to perform ADLs
                                                                        2011, American Journal of Sports Medicine

                                     Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Smoking Affect
Outcome?

Ø 95Smokers (current & Hx 40ppd)
 vs 129 Non-smokers
  u   UCLA scores
       ü Pre-op 15.9 vs 17.6,

       ü Post-op 25.0 vs 32.0

Ø Non-Smokers  more likely to have
 good to excellent results

                                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Osteoperosis Affect
Outcome?
  Ø   408 pts RCR, 272pts had CT arthrogram
      or US used to verify cuff integrity
  Ø   BMD - DEXA scan at last pre-operative
      visit
  Ø   Failure rate 22.8% (62/272)
      u   Multivariant analysis showed only BMD, fatty
          infiltration of infra, and retraction size showed
          significant relationship to cuff healing                       2011, American Journal of Sports Medicine

  Ø   Odds ratio of cuff failure in patients with
      osteoporosis vs normal were 1.56 and
      0.22 respectively
                                      Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Diabetes Affect
Outcome?
 Ø   2462 patient (57 diabetics), 1o RCRs, median f/u
     5.6yrs
     u   Adhesive Capsulitis: Diabetics 15.8% vs Non-
         Diabetics 4.4%
     u   Cuff Re-Tear: Diabetics 26.3% vs Non-Diabetics
         15.6%
     u   Any one complication: Diabetics 35.1% vs Non-
         Diabetics 22.7%
          ü   Complications: Infection, Adhesive capsulitis, Re-
              Tear, or Re-operation
 Ø   Diabetics diagnosed with A1c preoperatively
     u   Increasing A1c was NOT found to be associated
         with higher risk of frozen shoulder, retear, or
         reoperation                                     2020, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,
                                               Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021   Retrospective review
Does Doxycycline Affect
Outcome?
Ø   Rat Model, repair of supraspinatus
    u   Doxy-mediated inhibition of MMP-13
        activity reduces excessive degradation or
        remodeling of healing after RCR
Ø   Benefit: Doxycycline has broad
    spectrum antimicrobial activity against
    Gram-positives & Gram-negatives,
    including C. acnes
    u   Start before surgery or within 5 days                              Load to failure rate between
                                                                           groups

                                                                2010, American Journal of Sports Medicine
                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Vitamin D
Affect Outcome?
Ø     Rat Model, Vit-D deficient diet and UV light restriction
Ø     Supraspinatus detached and repaired with bone tunnels suture fixation
Ø     CT used to assess bone density and new bone formation at tuberosity
Ø     Biomechanical testing demonstrated a significant decrease in load to failure
      in experimental group compared to control at 2 weeks
       u At 4 weeks no difference in load to failure between groups

       u Histology showed less bone formation and less collagen fiber

          organization in Vit-D deficient group

    2013, American Journal of Sports
    Medicine

                                            Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Does Lipid Status Affect
Outcome? Cohort study, retrospective review
    Ø   30,638 pts, between 40-85yo, 1o arthroscopic repairs
        only, LDL/Cholesterol levels collected within 6
        months of surgery
    Ø   Rate of revision increased in patients with moderate
        to high total cholesterol levels
    Ø   Hyperlipidemia in patients without statin had higher
        rates of revision
    Ø   Revision rate increased in patients with moderate &
        high LDL levels
    Ø   High cholesterol environments cause lipids to
        accumulate within extracellular matrix of tendon
        which adversely affect stiffness and modulus
                                                                        2017, American Journal of Sports Medicine
                                     Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Level IV, Case Series

Ø   Smoking history, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, & osteoporosis
Ø   41,467 patients (41,844 shoulders), primary arthroscopic RCR
    u   3072 patients (3463 shoulders) underwent revision RCR (8.38%)
Ø   ↑ age & male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.10) were significantly predictive of revision RCR
Ø   Smoking most strongly predicted revision RCR (OR 1.36,P
2018, JBJS

                                   !
                                   #
                                   "
                                   #
                                   #

Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Ø   64pts, 2005-2008 PRGF injected into tendon
    initially and then spread over top
Ø   No significant differences in UCLA scores
    between groups
Ø   No differences at 1yr in patient satisfaction
Ø   MR-Arthrogram
     u 40% healed, 30% partial healing, 30% Lack
        of healing
    u   No difference between PRGF and control
        groups

                                                                     2013, Level 1, Arthroscopy

                                  Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Ø   48pts, PRP group had 3 PRP gels applied between torn
    tendon and greater tuberosity
Ø   Outcome measured via MRI or CTA at minimum 9
    months post op
Ø   Re-tear rate
     u PRP group 20%, Conventional group 55.6%

     u PRP group increase in cross-sectional area of
       supraspinatus
    u   No difference in clinical outcomes, better structural
        outcomes might suggest improved clinical outcomes
        in longer term follow-up                        2013, American Journal of Sports Medicine

                                              Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
DEBRIDE AND PARTIAL REPAIR

         Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: “Menu”

Ø   Debride + tenotomy + rehab
    u Improves pain
    u No consistent improvement of strength

      or motion
Ø   Partial repair
    u Margin convergence can restore
      balanced force couples
    u No consistent improvement

    u As high as 52% retear rates
                                                         Kim et al. Am J Sports Med 2012 Apr;40(4):786-93. doi:
                                                         10.1177/0363546511434546. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
                                                         Berth et al. J Orthop Traumatol . 2010 Mar;11(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s10195-

        ü   Kim et al: 42.4% (MRI)                       010-0084-0. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

        ü   Berth et al: 52% (US)    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SUPERIOR CAPSULAR
 RECONSTRUCTION

     Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
The Superior Capsule

Ø Passive constraint for the
  glenohumeral joint to
  superior humeral head
  translation
Ø Rotator cuff is a dynamic
  stabilizer to the joint
Ø Resists superior migration
  of the humeral head with
  deltoid contraction
                        Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Superior Capsular Reconstruction
                   (SCR) Rationale  JSES 2014

Ø   Superior capsule : 4-9 mm thick, and covers 30-60% of the greater tuberosity
Ø   Absent superior capsule, humeral translation increases in all planes
Ø   SCR can reverse superior translation and decrease subacromial contact pressures

                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Indications for SCR

Ø   Intolerable pain and/or
    unacceptable dysfunction
    with irreparable rotator cuff
    tear(s)
Ø   Hamada Grade 1 or 2
Ø   Intact or repairable
    subscapulris

                                    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Contraindications for SCR

Ø   Rotator cuff tears with
    moderate to severe rotator
    cuff arthropathy
Ø   Hamada Grade ≥ 3
Ø   Glenohumeral osteoarthritis
Ø   Irreparable subscapularis

                                  Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Rotator Cuff Disease
                          Irreparable Tears

Ø Superior       Capsular Reconstruction
  u   Mihata described using Tensor Fascia
      Lata
      ü   In the US, dermal allograft used
  u   Pushes humeral head down to allow
      prevention of superior migration and
      to provide fulcrum for motion

                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR: Reversing Superior Translation

  Mihata T. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1423-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546516631751. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
  Biomechanical Role of Capsular Continuity in Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon.
  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
  Role of the superior shoulder capsule in passive stability of the glenohumeral joint.

                                                                    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR: Reduces Subacromial Contact
           Pressure

  Mihata T, Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1423-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546516631751. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
  Biomechanical Role of Capsular Continuity in Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon.
  J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
  Role of the superior shoulder capsule in passive stability of the glenohumeral joint.
                                                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Importance of Posterior Rotator Cuff
       Continuity with SCR
    Technique                     Superior Migration              Subacromial Contact                   Compression force                ROM
                                                                  Pressure

    SCR alone                     No effect                       decreased                             No effect                        No effect

    SCR + posterior s/s           reversed                        decreased                             No effect                        No effect
    sutures

    SCR+ posterior and            No addl effect                  No addl effect                        No addl effect                   No addl effect
    anterior s/s sutures

       Mihata T, Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1423-30. doi: 10.1177/0363546516631751. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
       Biomechanical Role of Capsular Continuity in Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon.
       J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
       Role of the superior shoulder capsule in passive stability of the glenohumeral joint.

                                                                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Effect of Graft Thickness

                                                                                                          2016

Ø   < 4 mm graft reduced subacromial contact pressure
    u   Superior migration not improved
Ø   8 mm graft attached at 15 – 45o abduction reversed superior
    migration and decreased subacromial contact pressure

        Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
                                                                       Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Biomechanics of Different Grafts

Ø   Decreased subacromial contact pressure with
    the use of 8-mm fascia lata graft compared to
    4-mm acellular humeral dermal allograft
    u   Fascia lata allograft has less elongation and
        thinning than dermal graft
Ø   Clinical outcome data between 2 graft
    methods should not be generalized

                                        Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Mihata 2013

Ø   Level 4
Ø   23 patients (24 shoulders)
Ø   Age 65.1 (52-77), Duration of follow up 34.1 months
    (24-51)
Ø   Graft: Fascia lata autograft (6-8 mm)
Ø   83.3% healed
    u   Mean active forward elevation: 84o to148o
    u   Mean external rotation: 26o to 40o
    u   Mean acromial humeral distance: 4.6 mm to 8.7 mm
Ø   Mean ASES score improved: 23.5 to 92.9
                Mihata T, Lee TQ, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M, Tsujimura T, Kinoshita M. Clinical results of arthroscopic superior capsule
                reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar;29(3):459-70. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

                                                                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Hirahara 2017

Ø   Level 3
Ø   8 patients
Ø   Age 61.3 (47-78), Duration of follow up 32.4 months (25-39)
Ø   Graft: Acellular dermal allograft
Ø   VAS score decreased: 6.25 to 0.38
    u   Mean acromial humeral distance increased: 4.5 mm to 8.48 mm
        immediately after surgery and 7.6 mm at 2 years
Ø   Mean ASES score improved: 43.54 to 86.46
Ø   2 Failures
    u   1 patient revised to rTSA and 1 graft rupture after MVA

             Hirahara AM, Andersen WJ, Panero AJ. Superior capsular reconstruction: clinical outcomes after minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthop
             (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Nov/Dec;46(6): 266-78.

                                                                    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Mihata 2018
Mihata T, Lee TQ, Fukunishi K, Itami Y, Fujisawa Y, Kawakami T, Ohue M, Neo M. Return to sports and physical work after
arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction among patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2018
Apr;46(5):1077-83. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

             Ø    100 patients
             Ø    Age 66.9 (43-82), Duration of follow up 48 months
                  (24-88)
             Ø    Graft: Fascia lata autograft (6-8 mm)
             Ø    Complication rate: 16%
                    u    Includes 5 graft tears
                    u    Mean active forward elevation increased: 91o to147o
                    u    Mean external rotation increased: 26o to 41o
                    u    Mean internal rotation increased: L4 to L1
             Ø    Mean ASES score improved: 36 to 92
             Ø    Mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score
                  improved: 53 to 91                                                                                      Level 3
                                                                            Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Dinard 2018

u   Level 4                 Graft: Acellular dermal allograft
u   59 patients
u   1-year f/u (16-28); Mean age 62 ± 8.7years
     u42% with prior cuff repair
u VAS    5.8 à 1.7
u ASES 43.5 à         77.5
     u Mean forward flexion increased: 130o to 158o
     u Mean external rotation increased: 36o to 45o
u   AHI unchanged; only 45% (9 of 20 studied) healed
u   “Healed” group with better outcomes
u   Success: 67.8% (if 1 mm grafts excluded, 73%)

          Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.265. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

                                                              Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Denard 2018

u   11 Failures
    u   7 failures on humeral side; 3
        intrasubstance; 1 glenoid
u   100% success rate in those with
    healed graft
u   Takeaway points:
    u   Hamada I and II best candidates
    u   Higher subscapularis atrophy
        significant for poorer prognosis
            Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.265. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
                                                          Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Pennington 2018
Pennington WT, Bartz BA, Pauli JM, Walker CE, Schmidt W. Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with acellular dermal allograft for the treatment
of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: short-term clinical outcomes and the radiographic parameter of superior capsular distance. Arthroscopy. 2018
Jun;34(6):1764-73. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

                  Ø      Level 4
                  Ø      86 patients (88 shoulders)
                  Ø      Follow up consecutive SCR for MRCT; min 1 yr f/u
                  Ø      Age 59.4 (27-59)
                  Ø      Graft: Acellular dermal allograft
                           u    VAS 4.0 à 1.5
                           u    ASES 52 à 82
                           u    AHI: pre-op 7.1 à post op 9.7
                  Ø      Superior capsular distance: pre-op 53 mm; post op 46 mm
                           u    Distance from humerus to glenoid
                           u    Strength and ROM improved
                  Ø      90% satisfied
                                                                                              Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR Outcomes – Mihata 2019

u Level 4
u 30 patients
u 5-year f/u (16-28); Mean age 62
   ± 8.7years
u Graft: Tensor fascia lata
   autograft
u At 5 years, healed SCR
   restored shoulder shoulder
   function and resulted in higher                   J Bone Joint Surg Am.2019;101:1921-30 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00135
   rates of return to sport and work
u Patients with graft failure had
   severe cuff tear arthropathy
                                  Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR vs. Partial Infraspinatus
Repair for Irreparable Tears
Ø   21 SCR patients, 20/60 partial repair patients matched in a 1:1 ratio by sex,
    age, and tear configuration, (Goutallier grade ≥3)
Ø   Minimum follow-up 2 yrs, mean 29.4 mo (range, 24-53 mo)
Ø   Mean age of both groups 62.3 yrs (range, 47-79 yrs)
Ø   No significant differences seen between the SCR vs. PR groups in Constant
    score, Age- and sex- adapted Constant score, DASH score and WORC index
     u Reoperation rate was 4.8% (1/21) SCR cohort & 15% (9/60) PR cohort

Ø   Conclusion: SCR and PR resulted in significant improvements in patient-
    reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up, with no significant differences in
    clinical outcomes

                                          Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021   2021,Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
SCR Technical Tips

u   Position:
    u   Fix lateral SCR at 45o of abduction and 20o of internal
        rotation
u   Graft thickness:
    u   8mm better than 4 mm for decreasing superior translation
    u   4mm+ decreases subacromial contact pressure
         u Grafts not at least 3 mm will elongate by 15% leading to
           thinning of the graft
                               Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
SCR 2021: Conclusions
Ø   Indications (evolving) for SCR:
    u   Younger, active, SSc intact or repairable, absence OA,
        absence acetabularization, external rotation 3-4/5, compliant
Ø   SCRs are technically challenging
Ø   Dermal allograft (4-8 mm) is currently the best
    ECM option
Ø   Primary repair is the first goal (+/- augmentation)
Ø   Fix what you can

                                  Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
TENDON TRANSFERS
LOWER TRAPEZIUS VS. LATISSIMUS
           DORSI

           Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Rotator Cuff Disease
                        Irreparable Tears
Ø   Arthroscopic Assisted Lower
    Trapezius Tendon Transfer
    u Symptomatic irreparable RCT
    u No anterosuperior escape or
      pseudoparesis
    u Good subscapularis (or repairable)

    u External rotation lag sign

    u Intact Teres minor

                                 Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Ø Not  all repairable
Ø Irreparability
  u Massive tears (2+ tendons)
  u Fatty atrophy (Goutallier III-IV)

  u Substantial retraction (glenoid)

  u Proximal humeral migration

                             Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Trapezius Anatomy

Ø   Origin
    u   Medial third superior nuchal line, ligament nuchae, spinous
        processes and supraspinous ligaments to T12
Ø   Insertion
    u   Upper fibers to lateral third of posterior border of clavicle; lower
        to medial acromion and superior lip of spine of scapula to deltoid
        tubercle
Ø   Action
    u   laterally rotates, elevates and retracts scapula. If scapula is
        fixed, extends and laterally flexes neck
Ø   Innervation
    u   Spinal accessory nerve (C1-5) (spinal nerves C3 and C4 for
        proprioception)              Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Principles of Tendon Transfers

Ø  The transferred and recipient muscles should have a similar
  excursion and tension
Ø The transferred muscle must be expendable
Ø The transferred and recipient tendons should have a similar
  line of pull
Ø The transferred muscle should be designed to replace only 1
  function of the recipient muscle

               Brand PW, Beach RB, Thompson DE. Relative tension and potential excursion of muscles in the forearm
               and hand. J Hand Surg Am 1981;6:209-19.
                                            Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Why Lower Trapezius Transfer?

Ø Fairly simple transfer
Ø Arthroscopically assisted
Ø Better restoration of shoulder biomechanics
    u   The line of pull of the lower trapezius more closely mimics the
        infraspinatus tendon
Ø   Ease of post operative training the transfer
    u   trapezius contracts during shoulder external rotation
Ø   Partial subscapularis tear is not a contraindication
                             Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Rotator Cuff Disease
Petriccioli et al, 2016 JSES    Irreparable Tears
Ø Latissimus Dorsi Transfer
  u 25 patients with Lat Transfer anterior to the triceps

           ü   Follow-up, 35.7 months (range, 12-60 months)
     u Revision and primary patients with mean increase in
       Constant-Murley scores of 29.5 and 30.5 points,
       respectively
     u Osteoarthritis progression in 33.3% of patients

     u Good clinical outcomes at a midterm follow-up,

       especially in active men 60 years of age or younger
       and in patients with low preoperative elevation (
Latissimus vs. Lower
   Trap Transfers
Ø   Good results reported with latissimus transfer
    u Not reproducible by all surgeons
    u Out of phase transfer

    u More difficult

    u Morbidity if pedical injuried

Ø Biomechanical testing comparison
Ø Lower trap superior restoring native GH kinematics
  and joint reaction forces

                              Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Lower Trapezius
   Transfer
Ø Originally describe by Elhassan for
  the paralytic shoulder (trauma,
  obstetrical)
Ø Significant improvement of external
  rotation
Ø Marginal improvements of abduction
  and flexion

                           Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Ø   Anatomically distinct insertion sites for
     u Lower trapezius - inserted at the scapular
       spine dorsum
     u Middle trapezius- broadly along the superior

       surface of the scapular spine
Ø   Lower trapezius reliably identified without
    violating fibers of the middle trapezius
Ø   Muscle splitting
     u Spinal accessory nerve approximately 2 cm

       medial to the medial scapular border
                                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Ø 33 patients with an average age of 53
  years
Ø Average follow-up of 47 months
Ø 32 patients had significant improvement
  in pain, SSV, and DASH score
Ø ROM
    u Flexion-120°
    u Abduction- 90°

    u ER-50°
                        Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Ø   Patients with>60 degree of preoperative flexion
    u   more significant gains in ROM
Ø   Shoulder ER improved in all patients
    u   Not related to pre-op ROM
Ø   Complications
    u 4 seromas- observation only
    u 1 infection (BMI=36) requiring shoulder fusion

Ø   Conclusion
    u   LT transfer may lead to good outcome in most patients
                            Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Lower Trapezius Transfer MRI at 3 Months

                   Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
Bishai Algorithm for Full Thickness
        Rotator Cuff Tears

Cuff Repair with Dermal               SCR with Dermal                              Lower Trapezius with Achilles
Allograft, Xenograft, or              Allograft                                    Allograft
Synthetic                         •    Irreparable supraspinatus                   •   Irreparable supraspinatus and infraspinatus
                                       and intact or repairable                              +External Rotation Lag sign
      •   Thin Tissue                                                                    •
                                       infraspinatus
                                                                                   •   None to minimal glenohumeral
      •   Smoker                  •    None to minimal                                 osteoarthritis
                                       glenohumeral osteoarthritis
      •   Diabetic, hypothyroid                                                    •   Intact or repairable subscapularis
                                  •    Intact or repairable
      •   Revision                     subscapularis

                                                Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
THANK YOU

    Shariff K. Bishai, DO, PC © 2021
You can also read