Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response

Page created by Jeffery Casey
 
CONTINUE READING
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Bangladesh
                    HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA)

  Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017
                                            Report date: 20 May 2017

                                                                             Photo: CNA Team, Netrokona

                         Md. Yousuf Ali, Director-MIM, DDM, Email: ali_yousuf_86@yahoo.com
Contact for Inquiries:
                         Mahbubur Rahman, ERPC, CARE, Email: mahbubur.rahman@care.org
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Contents
Background to the assessment ......................................................................................................................................... 2
Key Findings: Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
Context of the Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh ........................................................................................................ 7
Key Vulnerability characteristics of six affected haor districts ............................................................................................ 8
Situation Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 10
Aggravating Factors ........................................................................................................................................................ 13
Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 14
Food Security ................................................................................................................................................................. 18
Livelihoods and Income .................................................................................................................................................. 20
Market access ................................................................................................................................................................ 24
Access, Infrastrucure and Early Recovery Concerns ......................................................................................................... 24
Communication .............................................................................................................................................................. 25
WASH ............................................................................................................................................................................. 27
Shelter & NFIs................................................................................................................................................................. 30
Health ............................................................................................................................................................................ 32
Nutrition ........................................................................................................................................................................ 33
Education ....................................................................................................................................................................... 35
Gender Based Violence (GBV) ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Child Protection .............................................................................................................................................................. 40
Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Annex A: Team composition ........................................................................................................................................... 44
Annex B: SADD by Upazila ............................................................................................................................................... 46
Annex C: D-Form Database ............................................................................................................................................. 48

                                                                                                                                                                                   1
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Background to the assessment

Heavy rainfalls as well as runoff from the upstream hills in India have led to early flooding of vast areas of croplands of
haors and low-lying areas of northeast Bangladesh. Flooding started on 28th March and gradually affected six districts
(Habiganj, Kishoreganj Moulavibazar, Netrokona, Sunamganj, and Sylhet). Rising water overflowed and breeched
embankments in many places and inundated vast areas of cropland, damaging a significant number of houses and
impacting the lives of more than 30% of the population of these six districts.
As agricultural land in this region remains under water for a large part of the year, there is only one cropping season in the
haors and this early onset flooding destroyed the 2017 crop of Boro rice (the primary crop) at its blooming stage, 20-30
days before harvest. The daily Dhaka Tribune has estimated, based on Ministry of Agriculture’s calculation, that the country
may lose around 800,000 MT of Boro rice this season1. Standing water has been contaminated by rotten paddy and plant
and a large number of fish and ducks have died2, although the exact cause is, as yet, unknown. Distress selling of livestock
as a negative coping mechanism has already been reported. This loss of the primary crop, together with the associated loss
of income for agricultural labourers and the loss of fish, will create severe food insecurity on top of the high underlying
poverty in the area unless assistance is received.
The Department of Disaster Management (DDM) requested this assessment which was supported by the Humanitarian
Coordination Task Team (HCTT). As per HCTT’s request, the Needs Assessment Working Group (NAWG) developed a plan
and presented at HCTT. With some revision the plan was adopted and a “Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA)” was
initiated under the leadership of DDM and functional coordination of CARE Bangladesh.

Key Findings: Summary

Overall impact
The haor areas of northeast Bangladesh are almost entirely single cropped areas with the majority of the communities
dependent solely on the boro3 rice crop cultivated from October to May. Significantly heavier rainfall and runoff from India
caused early flooding across more than half the haor area, destroying the rice crop, fodder and killing fish and ducks. It is
estimated4 that 4,667,000 people in 450 Unions (out of 530) in 60 Upazilas (out of 62) have been affected (to varying
degrees) in the six districts of Sunamganj, Sylhet, Netrokona, Kishoreganj, Habiganj, and Moulvibazar. With 65% of its
population affected, Sunamganj district is worst hit followed by Netrkona (33%) and Sylhet (25%). Approximately 21% of
the population is affected in the other districts.

                                                        Situation at a glance
 People affected                     4,667,000 (31% of population in affected area)
 Districts affected                  6 districts (Habiganj, Kishoreganj, Moulvobazar, Netrokona, Sunamganj, Sylhet)
                                     Sunamganj is worst affected
 Upazilas affected                   60 (out of 62)
 Unions affected                     450 (out of 530)
 Deaths                              105
 Boro rice crop                      Largely destroyed (estimated to be more than 30,400 million BDT4)
 Fodder                              Serious losses
 Fish                                Serious losses due to contaminated water
 People affected                     4,667,000
 Houses damaged                      28,037
 Negative coping strategies          Already reported reduction in food intake and in variety of food

1 http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/nation/2017/04/08/flash-flood-haors-may-worsen-rice-price-hike/
2 Shifting the Power Needs Assessment Report, April 2017
3 Boro rice season: winter cropping season in Bangladesh extending from October to April
4 DDM, D-forms, 11 May 2017
5 NDRCC report, 11/05/2017

                                                                                                                            2
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Overall key priority needs
         The priority need identified by both men and women in all 27 locations was for immediate food assistance.
         Most of the communities assessed reported that almost all households in the affected areas have lost most or all
          their food stocks and have adopted negative coping strategies. Most have also lost a significant proportion of this
          season’s (i.e. this year’s) income. Negative coping strategies such as reducing food intake or selling livestock and
          poultry are being used. People are likely to be forced into more desperate coping strategies if alternative income
          or sustained assistance is not available.
         Feed for livestock and assistance with livelihoods support were the second priorities in almost all locations.
         In ten sites, inadequate sanitation facilities were reported as a priority. This was a key area where some difference
          could be noted between the male and female group responses. Women found sanitation to be more of a concern
          than men and this could be related to or lead to protection concerns.. Although the sample size was small, this is
          in line with other recent flooding events in Bangladesh.
         Access to safe drinking water was identified as a priority in five of the six sites in Sylhet, but not prioritised
          elsewhere, although it was highlighted as an issue in half the assessed sites overall.
         Health and hygiene promotion activities need to be enhanced, water purification tablets provided, and Inter-
          Agency Emergency Health kits prepositioned, to minimise, and respond to, the likely increase in communicable
          diseases usually associated with severe flooding and a breakdown in sanitation.
         In the areas where shelters/houses have been damaged, or are likely to degrade in the coming monsoon period,
          assistance in effecting repairs (cash or materials) is a priority need.
Key Sector Findings
Food Security, livelihood and Income
         Reduction in household income is the main impact for almost all the affected population.
         Reduction in incomes has already impacted food access. The main problems identified by communities were:
           Lack of food (cited as a problem in all 27 assessed sites),
           Lack of cooking fuel (in 25 sites)
           Poor quality of food (in 20 sites).
         DDM (11 May 2017) report that over 870,000 farmers have been affected, as have the 55% of the landless
          population who rely on seasonal labour (and would have been anticipating work during the upcoming harvest).
         The major challenges to the resumption of livelihoods were identified as lack of livelihood assets and financial
          resources, a lack of alternative income source and a lack of agricultural inputs.
Infrastructure
         Infrastructure repair (embankments and culverts and river dredging) was also identified as an area that would
          require external assistance.
Shelter
         DDM reported more than 28,000 houses to be (fully or partially) damaged across four districts (Sunamganj (68%
          of total), Moulvibazar (26%), Haobiganj (6%) and Sylhtet (0.07%).6
         The CNA found reports to damage to housing in some areas, this appears to be localised to a few areas at this
          stage. As the monsoon sets in it is expected that significantly more houses will become uninhabitable.
         Overcrowded shelters offering insufficient privacy was the main problem identified by women.
         Despite the poor condition of some homes, displacement was not identified as an issue in the CNA.
         In a few sites, people reported having insufficient materials to make property repairs and in only one site was a
          lack of NFIs identified as a problem.
WASH
         Water and sanitation coverage in some of the haor areas of NE Bangladesh remain below the basic minimum level.
          The water and sanitation coverage in the four districts assessed (Netrokona, Kisorganj, Sylhet, Sunamganj) is below
          the Bangladesh average and all four districts are ‘low performing districts’ in that coverage is not effective or
          uniform for all people living in the district with pockets of extreme disadvantage.

6 Moulvibazar and Haobiganj were not part of the primary data collection for the CNA because they were not considered among the 4 worst affected
districts overall.

                                                                                                                                                   3
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

         The floods have contaminated 24% of water points in Sunamganj, 18% in Sylhet, 16% in Kisoreganj, and 8% in
          Netrokona. 7
         In just over 50% of assessed sites, communities raised the issues of having insufficient water and poor quality of
          drinking water.
         In all except one ward communities said sanitation facilities were inadequate in terms of quality and, in the
          majority of sites, communities reported insufficient latrines or none at all.
         The low quality of ‘unimproved’ sanitation facilities and the absence of faecal sludge management gives rise to a
          potential risk of skin disease and diarrhoeal disease. Although the department of public health has provided water
          purification inputs the likelihood of water borne diseases remains.
Health
         Respondents from Sylhet (100%), Sunamganj (83%), Kishoreganj (67%) and Netrokona (58%) have expressed their
          observation as serious health problem due to the flash flood. Skin disease, snakebite and diarrhoea have been
          identified by the community groups as prevailing threats in different locations of the assessment area.
         Inter-Agency Emergency Health Kits (IEHK) are needed to be prepositioned to tackle the situation.
         Health promotion and disease surveillance activities need to be enhanced.
Nutrition
         42 CGDs (at 23 of the 27 sites) reported that health including nutrition is a serious problem.
         All women’s community group discussions reported that feeding/breast-feeding children under 2 years are a
          problem since the start of the flash flood.
         The dietary and eating practices of women/girls been impacted more since the disaster than that of men and boys.
         Pregnant and lactating women are not eating sufficient amounts of food.
         Health of children has worsened since the disaster.
Education
         School attendance has been impacted. Communities report that the main reasons children are not in school are:
           Parents want their children to work/help the family recover
           School is inaccessible
           Inability to pay fees
Gender-based Violence
         Physical assault was identified by community groups as the most common risk of violence confronting women and
          girls (23 groups out of 54), followed by debt-bondage (9 groups out of 54).
         Other identified risks of gender-based violence include desertion, sex trafficking, denial of resources and
          opportunities, and increase in early/forced marriage linked to financial distress following disasters.
         The observed absence of night lighting, unsafe access to bathing and latrine facilities, and limited accessibility to
          services may indicate a broader spectrum of safety and security risk in Sylhet division that was not captured by
          the assessment.
Communication
         Information needs are highest in Sunamganj
         Across all affected areas there is a particular need to provide information about how to access food; as well as
          guidance about financial support and livelihoods.
         60% of CGDs mentioned that no access to television was the main barrier of accessing information. People also
          mentioned no access to a newspaper (51%), no electricity (51%), no credit for a mobile phone (36%) and no access
          to radio (32%) as barriers of accessing information. The situation is different in different areas.

7 DPHE reported to WASH Cluster.

                                                                                                                             4
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Overall Priority Needs
                       100%                                                     1

                                                      2
                       50%                                                                3
                                      6           4                                                      5
                                                              9       7                           8

                        0%

Figure 1 Overall priority needs

                           Total Female opinion
                                           1                                            Total Male opinion
                                                                                                      1
        70%                                                               70%
        60%                                                               60%
        50%                                                               50%             2
        40%                       2                                       40%
        30%                                           3                   30%                            3
                   5       4                                                        5             6              4
        20%                                   7           6    6          20%   5
        10%                               0                                                   7              0
                                                                          10%
         0%                                                                0%
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Figure 2 Male Vs Female groups opinion on priority

                                     Sunamgonj                                                       Sylhet
                                                     1                                                        1
     100%                                                                50%
      80%                                                                40%           2
                                                                               3
      60%                       2                                        30%
                                                         3                         4
      40%                                                        4       20%                                                 5
                         5                    6                                                 6
      20%           0                     0                  0           10%                             0            0             0
       0%                                                                 0%

                                    Netrakona1                                                 Kishorgonj
     70%                                                                                                       1
     60%                                                                 70%
     50%                                                                 60%
     40%                       2                                                       2
                                                         3               50%
     30%                                                                 40%                                          3
     20%                5                     4                      4   30%
     10%        0                         0                  0           20%   0   4             0       0                   0      4
      0%                                                                 10%
                                                                          0%

Figure 3 Key priority needs by district

                                                                                           6
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Context of the Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh 8

 A haor is a bowl, or saucer-shaped, shallow natural depression found
in Northeast Bangladesh. One of the key characteristics of the haor        Haor: fast facts
region is that a number of these water bodies connect during the            Natural depression of unique hydro-
monsoon forming vast bodies of water. In the dry season over winter          ecological characteristics
water recedes again leaving a series of wetland habitats. It is a unique
wetland hydro-ecological environment rich in biodiversity.                  Total number of haor: 373

The Haor Basin spreads across seven districts; Sylhet, Sunamganj,           Area coverage: 1.99 million ha(13.5% of
Habiganj, Moulvibazar, Kishoreganj, Brahmanbaria and Netrokona,              country’s total land)
covering an area of 20,022 sq km. Three distinct rivers flow through        7 haor districts: Sylhet, Sunamganj,
the region bringing with them an inflow of water from India.                 Habiganj, Moulvibazar, Kishoreganj,
Bordering the Meghalaya region of India means that the haors,                Brahmanbaria and Netrokona.
already a region receiving the highest precipitation in the world, can      Total population: 19.37 million (12% of
be exposed to huge inflow of water from across the border. Pre-              national population)
monsoon flash floods are the major natural disaster the region faces
threatening the boro crop almost every year. Boro rice is the only          Major contribution to national economy:
major crop in the haors, accounting for most of the region’s income          - estimated annual production of 5.25
and providing most of its employment so the local economy is tightly           million MT of rice
linked to a successful harvest. On average an estimated 5.25 million         - country’s 20% inland fish production,
MT of rice is produced in the haors accounting for 18% of                      22% cattle production and 22% duck
Bangladesh’s total rice production. The region has an estimated fish           production
habitat area of around 967,000 ha as well as 269,005 ha of forest
                                                                            Numerous aquatic and forest resources
resources, valuable minerals and energy resources.                           including pearl mussels, migratory birds
The pre-monsoon season is characterized by increasing rainfall and           and numerous other ecosystem services.
flash floods. The bulk of the annual rainfall occurs during the
monsoon season when flash floods are regular and frequent and the central part of the Northeast Region is flooded to a
depth of several meters. The post-monsoon is characterized by decreasing rainfall and the draining of water accumulated
in the monsoon season. The dry season is one of little or no rain, and river inflow is greatly reduced.9

8 Haor Advocacy Platform, Position Paper, 27 April 2017
9 More info: http://www.iwmbd.org/haorweb/
                                                                                                                        7
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Key Vulnerability characteristics of six affected haor districts 10
                                                                                                                      Data Source
Key indicators           Netrokona Sunamgonj         Sylhet     Kishoregonj   Habiganj     Moulvibazar   National
                                                                                                                      and Year

                                                                                                                      BBS Census,
Total population          2,229,642     2,467,968   3,434,188     2,911,907    2,089,001     1,919,062 14,39,25006
                                                                                                                      2011

Population in rural                                                                                                   BBS Census,
                          1,970,781     2,204,389   2,672,142     2,422,998    1,844,035     1,710,983 11,04,80,514
areas                                                                                                                 2011
                                                                                                                      BBS Census,
Pop density/km2              798           659         995          1,083         792           686        1,203      2011
Gender Ratio                                                                                                          BBS Census,
                               99          100         101            97           96             97      101.24
(male/female %)                                                                                                       2011
% of population with                                                                                                  BBS Census,
                             30.2         34.0         62.9          49.6        47.7           50.8            57
electricity                                                                                                           2011
% HH using solid fuel
                             99.8         98.4         79.3          94.1        97.3           96.3        88.2      MICS, 2013
for cooking
% HH Use Improved
                             100          99.5         83.8          100         99.2           98.9        97.9      MICS, 2013
drinking water sources
% with access to
                             41.7         50.8         63.5          41.1        52.0           66.7        55.9      MICS, 2013
improved sanitation
                                                                                                                      The World
Life expectancy                                                                                          70.7 yrs
                                                                                                                      Bank, 2013

                                                                                                                      MSVR,BBS,
Under 5 mortality/1000       56.2         91.7         66.8          24.7        50.3           45.7            42    2014
% Severely Child
                             30.3         26.2         20.7           20.        24.4           15.8       23.39      MICS, 2013
Stunted (MICS, 2012)
% Stunted children                                                                                                    BBS, WFP,
                               44           46           44           44           44             44        41.2
under 5                                                                                                               IFAD 2012
Maternal mortality per                                                                                                WHO, 2001,
                                                                                                             220
1000                                                                                                                  UNICEF 2010

IPC Food security                                                                                                     IPC 2nd
                         Moderate       Severe      Moderate    Moderate      Moderate      Moderate        -         Round
Classification (CFI)
                                                                                                                      Chronic
% Below the upper                                                                                                     Analysis,
                             35.3           26         24.1          30.3        25.3            2.7        32.3      WB,
                                                                                                                      2015,2010
poverty line
                                                                                                                      Bangladesh
% Below the lower
                             19.5         20.6         19.5          16.4        20.1           21.1        18.4      WB, 2010
poverty line
% Underweight                                                                                                         BBS, WFP,
                               39           41           37           38           41             37        8.12      IFAD 2012
children under 5 years
                                                                                                                      BBS Census,
Literacy rates (%)          45.60        34.40        45.60          40.9        40.5           51.1       53.34
                                                                                                                      2011

Table 1: Key Indicators (source: IPC)

10 Key characteristics table prepared by IPC Bangladesh team
                                                                                                                                    8
Bangladesh HCTT Coordinated Needs Assessment (CNA) - Floods in Northeast (Haor) areas of Bangladesh, April-May 2017 - Humanitarian Response
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Map 1: Proportion of people below lower poverty line (produced by NIRAPAD)

                                                                                                                    9
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Situation Overview

Map 2: Inundated areas of The Haor Region as at 12 May (produced by BRAC)

The impact of the flooding according to the Government of Bangladesh as at 11 May is summarised in the table below.

                  # of       # of        # of          # of        % of total     # of      Damaged      Damaged
   Name of
                affected   Affected    Affected      Affected     population    Damaged     Cropland       Crops
   District
                Upazila     Union     Household     Population     affected      Houses     (Hectare)    (Mil BDT)

 Habiganj          8          65          87,880       439,400       21%           1,746      56,560       4,751.04
 Kishoreganj       13         61         152,481       609,924       21%                -     61,207       8,642.43
 Sunamganj         11         87         325,990     1,599,950       65%          18,969     131,285      13,128.50
 Sylhet            13        105         212,520       850,080       25%              20      64,438       3,843.75
 Moulvibazar       7          61          85,354       424,775       22%           7,302      21,513           1.18
 Netrokona         10         71         167,180       743,494       33%                -     69,710          33.94
 Total             62        450      1,031,405     4,667,623       31%          28,037     404,713      30,400.83
Table 2: Key information on impact based on D-Forms of Government of Bangladesh (received 11/05/2017)

                                                                                                                      10
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

 Map 3: Number of total population affected by upazila (produced by NIRAPAD)

Map 4: Percentage of total population affected by upazila (produced by NIRAPAD)

                                                                                                11
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

No Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) exists for the affected population, so the table below shows a proportional
breakdown based on census data of the affected districts11.
                                                                              Total
                           0 - 19 yrs                     65+ yrs                          Total Men Total Affected
      District                                                               Women
                                F              M               F            M
 Habiganj Zila              107,078         111,027          10,294        10,673           215,723     223,677          439,400

 Kishoreganj Zila           145,383         150,197          15,574        16,090           299,995     309,929          609,924

 Moulvibazar Zila            99,555         102,675           9,552         9,851           209,111     215,664          424,775

 Netrokona Zila             176,941         178,060          20,681        20,812           370,575     372,919          743,494

 Sunamganj Zila             409,689         408,283          37,435        37,306           801,351     798,599        1,599,950

 Sylhet Zila                212,759         210,327          17,330        17,132           427,483     422,597          850,080

 Total                     1,151,405        1,160,567        110,866      111,865       2,324,238      2,343,385        4,667,623

Table 3: Sex and Age Disaggregation (SADD) of affected Population (proportionate to the census data)

Response to date by government and other stakeholders:
The Government of Bangladesh has responded in many affected areas with distributions of rice and cash. 330,000
households are being given Vulnerable Group Feeding registration cards and a further 520,088 affected households will
receive a GR of rice and cash and cash through the Employment Generation Program for Poorest scheme.

                           GR Rice (MT)         GR Rice (MT)                                   VGF

           District             Total         Total Allocation     # of allotted VGF card     Allocated rice (MT) for 3 month
                             Allocation                               for flood (from         and 8 days (from 23 Apr to July
                                                                          MoDMR)                      2017) @ 30 Kg

     Sylhet                          428         2,437,000             50,000                                         4,900
     Habigonj                        503         1,400,000             29,000                                         2,842
     Sunamgonj                      1,550        8,500,000             150,000                                       14,700
     Moulvibazar                     343         1,450,000               1,000                                           98
     Kishoregonj                     652         3,870,000             50,000                                         4,900
     Netrakona                       648         4,240,000             50,000                                         4,900
     Total                          4,124      21,897,000              330,000                                       32,340
Table 4: Government response as of 12 May (NDRCC Report, 13 May 2017)

BRAC:
             BRAC has provided livestock feed support (ready feed, wheat bran & rice brain) to 6,500 ultra-poor households in
              Habigonj, Sunamgonj, Kishoregonj and Netrakona. According to their assessment these are the districts most in
              need.
             In line with GoB initiative, BRAC distributed a relief package consisting 30 Kg rice and BDT 500 to 59,461 worst
              affected families in five districts (Kishoreganj, Sunamganj, Habiganj, Netrokona and Sylhet).

11N.B. this gives the vulnerable categories as in the BBS census data. The census gives the category 0-19
years unlike some age disaggregation that is 0-18 years. Total adult population (19-65 years) can be
calculated by subtracting vulnerable groups from the total.
                                                                                                                                12
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Dan Church Aid:
     DCA Bangladesh will provide cash grant support to 1140 affected households consisting of BDT 4000 per HH in
       Kalmakanda Upazila and Dharmapasha Upazila under Netrokona and Sunamganj District.

Bangladesh Red Crescent Society (BDRCS):
    BDRCS is planning to distribute 2-week food packages to 400 affected people through its district branches in
       Sunamganj, Netrakona, Kishorganj and Habiganj. They will provide Food package (Rice-25 kg, Pulse-2kg, Edible
       Oil-2 L, Sugar-2 kg, Salt-1 kg, Suji (Semolina)-2 kg) for two weeks (the package is worth 2000 per household).

Oxfam:
    Oxfam is in the process of proving support of BDT 4,000/HH through its partners in Sunamganj and Kishoreganj
       districts. Proposals from partner agencies have been received and are being reviewed. The number of households
       may increase.

Islamic Relief BD:
      IRB will provide a 15-day food package (rice 20kg, dal 2kg, chhola 3kg, oil 2ltr, sugar 3kg) worth BDT 2000 to 7200
         HH in Netrokona, Kishoreganj, Sunamganj and Sylhet.
      IRB will also going to provide cash BDT 2000 to 1750 HH in the same districts.

Muslim Aid:
    Muslim Aid will provide support in Sunamganj district of BDT 4000 per HH and a standard hygiene pack.

Aggravating Factors

Most of the challenges faced in haor region are linked to poverty. Overall district level indicators mask pockets of extreme
poverty in some parts of the region and poverty is manifest in food insecurity, under nutrition and fragile housing
construction materials all of which contribute to make households highly vulnerable to disasters and to circumstances such
as this years’ flooding which was both earlier and more severe than expected. The continual need to deal with flash
flooding events such as those recorded in 2002, 2004, 2007, 2009, 2010 and 2012 are considered as part of the reason for
people’s inability to escape ongoing extreme poverty (GoB flood response plan 2014).
The districts fall below the national average on a number of key indicators including access to electricity, literacy under 5
mortality (except for Kishorgonj), stunted children and underweight children (see table above)

Landlessness
Hoar inhabitants are constantly at risk of major flooding. The normal level of water in the rainy season causes considerable
damage every year on the island slopes as waves wash away a part of the island soil contributing to landlessness.
Landlessness is a significant issue in the area with some studies finding over 70% of the population to be effectively
landlessness 12. Landlessness is associated with poverty but in the haors it is also linked to this erosion of land on the hati
by wave action that takes place during the wet season. The density of population in these islands is high and houses located
on the edge of the islands are continually at risk of inundation and collapse so families in these homes face the on-going
risk of being displaced. In severe seasons, water levels during inundations reach 1.5m above the level of the floor of the
houses (JNA 2012).

Food insecurity and poor nutrition
The haor basin has been identified as one of the ‘highly food insecure’ regions of the country (WFP 2004). Sunamganj has
been classified in Level 4 or Severe Chronic Food Insecurity (CFI) by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC),
Chronic Analysis. The three other districts have been classified in moderate CFI (Level 3)13. The physical conditions of the
haors together with the poor infrastructure are the root causes of the high levels of poverty in the region. (IFAD 2011).

12 P. K. Sarma, Scenario of haor vulnerabilities and other obstacles for sustainable livelihood development in Nikli Upazila, Bangladesh Agricultural
University Research System (BAURES), Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh- 2202, Bangladesh.

13 Chronic Food Insecurity Situation Overview in Bangladesh, December 2015; IPC
                                                                                                                                                        13
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Even though people have adapted their lives and livelihoods to live in the Haor areas, early flash flooding can have a
devastating effect as there is only one Boro crop planted annually (Haor Basin JNA 2012).
Rates of stunting are highest in the Haor region, out of all the FSNSP surveillance zones, where half of the children are
stunted (FSNSP, 2012, unpublished). The Haor region has a greater rate of adult malnutrition than the rest of the country
(FSNSP, 2012, unpublished). So any reduction in food security can have an important effect on overall nutrition if not
addressed. The timing of flooding is a critical factor in this. The 2010 flash floods occurred in April and washed away
immature crops, it was estimated that in the affected areas 80% of the Boro harvest was lost (Oxfam 2010) This flooding
in 2010 affected 75,000 people directly, according to EM-Dat, however, because the flooding took place in April (early) it
created far greater medium term food security needs. In 2012 the flash floods occurred after the harvest and people had
already secured their food, meaning there was an immediate food need (Haor Basin JNA 2012).

Infrastructure challenges
Lack of markets and power supplies has limited the growth of the non-farm sector and the growth of new employment
opportunities (IFAD 2011). There is very limited presence of financial institutions in the affected areas.
People living in the haors face greater challenges in transportation than those in many other parts of the country. Most
linking roads are submerged for six months of the year and movement is mainly only possible by boat. Motorized vehicle
transportation is possible only in major towns (Haor Basin JNA 2012). Boat transport can be both expensive and dangerous
depending on water conditions, naturally becoming even more challenged during floods. Women living in the haors are
particularly disadvantaged and vulnerable. Lack of roads affects women and girls more than men as they find it difficult to
travel by boat or walk on muddy tracks. This means they have less access to education, health services and employment,
which in turn contributes to social barriers (IFAD 2011).

On-going vulnerability
While flash floods are the main natural hazard people in the haors face, their on-going development is also frustrated by
other hazards including arsenic contamination, erosion and storms. This multiple hazard profile only increases their
vulnerability. As this is the very beginning of the rains and the monsoon can continue until September with late rains up
until November even a normal monsoon (as currently predicted by South Asian Climate Outlook Forum, April 2017) can
have a serious impact on lives and livelihoods.

Assessment Methodology

Overall objective:
To provide a shared understanding of the impact of the Flood in North-eastern haor districts of Bangladesh

Specific objectives:
To provide a shared and agreed overview of the situation in Sylhet, Sunamganj, Netrokona and Kishoreganj districts that-
        Identifies priority needs
        Provides approximate numbers of affected people
        Identifies most severely affected geographic areas
        Provides recommendations to inform strategic decisions
        Gives voice to affected people

Expected Results:
    1.   Collection and collation of secondary data on NE flooding (including government, UN, aid agencies and other
         assessments or data that has been collected)
    2.   54 Community Group Discussions (CGD) (27 male, 27 female groups) at 27 sites.
    3.   27 Direct Observations and 27 Severity Rankings at community level by the assessment teams (1 of each per site)
    4.   9 Upazila Validation Meetings with PIOs/UNOs regarding the current situation and needs.
    5.   Compilation of D forms provided by DDM

                                                                                                                         14
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Expected Deliverables:
     A. The assessment report shared with HCTT and other relevant aid stakeholders
     B. A power point presentation on the summary/key findings
     C.     Static maps created using secondary and primary data
     D. A complete data set of primary data

Data Sources:
           27 purposively selected sites in 9 upazilas across 4 districts
           Male and female Community Group Discussions (CGDs) at each site, 54 CGDs in total
           Direct Observation and severity ranking at each site by assessment team
           Upazila validation information at each upazila conducted with government officials
           D forms provided by Department of Disaster Management
           Secondary Data from pre-disaster and in-disaster sources

Sampling Strategy:
A purposive sampling method has been used to identify assessment areas based on what is known about this particular
disaster, referring specifically to information provided in available situation reports from INGO ESC and NIRAPAD.
                                                                                                 Target # per      Total target
         Type of Site                                  Description
                                                                                               Upazila (minimum)     number
                                     (Villages that have direct access to roads, facilities and
     Mainland village                                                                                                       01                      09
                                     other communities without crossing any waterway)
                                     (Island villages surrounded by water but easily accessible
     Baro (large) hati                                                                                                      01                      09
                                     by boat, not far from mainland)
                                     (Island villages surrounded by water, difficult to reach and
     Choto (small) hati14            only accessible by boat, located far from mainland)                                    01                      09

                                                                                               Total target                 03                      27

Geographic Targeting:
The four most affected districts – Sylhet, Sunamganj, Netrokona and Kishoreganj –within these districts 27 purposively
selected sites in 9 upazilas were identified as the sample for this assessment.

                  District                                                    Upazila                                             Sites
          Sunamganj                                          Dharmapasa                                                              3
                                                             Jamalgonj                                                               3
                                                             Taherpur                                                                3

          Sylhet                                             Goainghat                                                               3
                                                             Kanaighat                                                               3
          Netrokona                                          Khaliajuri                                                              3
                                                             Mohonganj                                                               3
          Kishoreganj                                        Itna                                                                    3
                                                             MithaimoIn                                                              3
                   4 Districts                                               9 Upazilas                                          27 Sites

14 Hati are villages which appear to be islands in a haor where boat is the only transportation system. Sometimes hati do not appear as islands until the
rainy season.
                                                                                                                                                        15
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Timeframe:

 Major Activity                                                                     Start Date                End Date

 Planning Meeting                                                                    23-Apr                    23-Apr
 Form the Core Group                                                                 24-Apr                    30-Apr
 Area wise responsibility distribution
 Formation of field teams
 Finalize the methodology, sampling, TOR
 Finalize the Qs and translate
 Digitization of the Tools & Database
 Field Orientation sessions                                                          1-May                    2-May
 Field Assessment/data collection & entry                                            3-May                    8-May
 Data entry (using Tab/Android phone)                                                3-May                    8-May
 Review of the secondary data                                                        3-May                    8-May
 Primary data analysis                                                               9-May                    11-May
 First draft of the findings                                                         12-May                   15-May
 Joint Analysis meeting (finding presentation to core group)                         16-May                   16-May

 Incorporating Feedback from core group                                              17-May                   20-May
 Dissemination of the findings and report                                            20-May                   20-May
Data Collection & Data Entry:
In each selected upazila three sites were chosen: one mainland village, one baro (large) hati and one chato (small hati). At
each site two community group discussions (CGDs) were held to discuss the assessment questions: one comprised 30-40
males and the other 30-40 females. In addition, field teams undertook a direct observation assessment. At the upazila level,
field teams met with the UNO/PIO in order to cross-check information, collect the D-form and ask other relevant questions.

                                  Method       of      data   Total
 Geographic areas                                                        Remarks
                                  collection                  formats
                                                                         30-40 (max) male participants from different livelihood groups,
                                  CGD-01 with Male            1
                                                                         elderly, PWD etc.
                                                                         30-40 (max) Female participants from different livelihood groups,
                                  CGD-02 with Female          1          elderly, pregnant and lactating mothers, widow/divorced,
 Mainland village
                                                                         adolescent girl, PWD etc.
                                                                         Direct observation through transit work, field visit and cross
                                  Direct Observation          1
                                                                         checking (if possible)
                                  Severity Ranking            1          Will be done by respective field team after completing all tasks
                                  CGD-01 with Male            1
                                  CGD-02 with Female          1
 Baro (large) hati
                                  Direct Observation          1
                                  Severity Ranking            1
                                                                         As above
                                  CGD-01 with Male            1
                                  CGD-02 with Female          1
 Choto (small) hati
                                  Direct Observation          1
                                  Severity Ranking            1
 Upazila validation     with                                             Need to cross-check CGDs information, asking few new questions
                                  Key informant interview     1
 UNO/PIO                                                                 as mentioned in format. Collection D-form etc.
 Total formats for each Upazila                               13
 Each field team is requested to write down and submit any special findings/information of each discussion.
 District focal will also collect the compiled D-Form or GoB any response form from District level.

                                                                                                                                    16
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Map 5: Upazilas covered by CNA (produced by NIRAPAD)

                                                                                                                  17
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Detailed Assessment Findings
Food Security
Baseline
Sunamganj has been classified in Level 4 or Severe Chronic Food Insecurity (CFI) by the Integrated Food Security Phase
Classification (IPC), Chronic Analysis. The three other districts have been classified in moderate CFI (Level 3)15. Food access,
utilization, sanitation, caring practices and more especially poverty are the major limiting factors in the districts with higher
levels of Chronic Food Insecurity.
In all the four districts the status of food security outcomes - food consumption quality, quantity and under nutrition are
of major concern.
Limited livelihood opportunities and insufficient human, physical and financial capitals limit access to food and utilisation.

Impact and needs
A review of secondary data on flooding in the haor region identified the following major impacts flash floods 16:
                  Food stocks are damaged or destroyed.
                  Food security is affected through loss of crops, food stocks and agricultural inputs and equipment.
                  Potential disruption to markets (however these are restored quickly, in the flash floods of 2012 only one market
                   was not re-established in the first 48 hours).
Excessive rains combined with the onrush of water from the nearest Indian hills across the broader from the end of March
to 5 April inundated more than 60% standing boro paddy fields in North East Bangladesh. The flood has affected daily life
in the affected areas and many people have been marooned while houses, agricultural farms, and cultivable land have
been inundated. Water is declining gradually but the damage to crops is irrecoverable.17
All the community groups, both men and women, reported that they currently face a problem in relation to food. By far,
the most reported problem in relation to food was that households did not have enough food available, followed by
concerns about fuel for cooking and quality of food. The findings were similar for both male and female CGDs and across
districts18.

                         Overall and per gender                                                                    Per district
              60                                                                              20
              50
                                                                                              15
              40
                                                                                    per CGD
    per CGD

              30                                                                              10
              20                                                                              5
              10
               0                                                                              0
                    Not enough No cooking No fuel to    Not good No access                         Not enough No cooking No fuel to   Not good No access to
                       food     facilities cook with     enough to markets                            food     facilities cook with    enough   markets
                                                          food                                                                          food

                          OVERALL        MALE          FEMALE                                  Kishoreganj      Netrakona       Sunamganj        Sylhet

Figure 4: Main problems in relation to food. Three options were mentioned by each of the 54 FGD (12 CDGs in. Kishoreganj,
12 in Netrakona, 12 in Sylhet, and 18 in Sunamganj)

15 Chronic Food Insecurity Situation Overview in Bangladesh, December 2015; IPC
16 Pre-disaster Secondary Data, The JNA Consolidation Project, March 2014
17 INGO Emergency Sub-committee, Sitrep No: 02, April 13, 2017
18 Please note, 2 upazilas in Kishoreganj, Netrakona and Sylhet, and 3 in Sunamganj.
                                                                                                                                                      18
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Communities reported that usually, at this time of the year, a majority of the communities have food stocks expected to
last more than 15 days. According to community groups now, food stocks have been mostly or completely destroyed.
Insufficient food was the main problem reported in relation to food security. The main reasons for not being able to access
food and other commodities in the market were that households could not afford food and commodities (reported by 51
out of 54 CGDs). Reasons given for this were:
                  1) prices have increased;
                  2) difficulty in accessing markets (16 out of 54 CGDs) due to road condition or transportation cost;
                  3) food and commodities are not available in the market as the supply chain has been disrupted;
Women’s access to markets (women mobility) was not considered an issue, as it was reported for only one CGD.

                                                    Overall and per gender
             60
             50
             40
   per CGD

             30
             20
             10
              0
                     Commodities not Food not available Difficulty accessing   Cannot afford     Cannot afford food    others
                      available in the in the market       market (road        commodities          (prices have
                          market                            condition or        (prices have         increased)
                                                          transportation         increased)
                                                                cost)

                                                          OVERALL     MALE      FEMALE

Figure 5: Reasons for not being able to access essential food for all the CDGs and by gender. (Each of the 54 CGDs could
mention three options)

                                                               Per District
             18
             16
             14
             12
   per CDG

             10
              8
              6
              4
              2
              0
                     Commodities not Food not available Difficulty accessing    Cannot afford     Cannot afford food     others
                      available in the in the market       market (road         commodities          (prices have
                          market                            condition or         (prices have         increased)
                                                        transportation cost)      increased)

                                                Kishoreganj     Netrakona      Sunamganj        Sylhet

Figure 6: Reasons for not being able to access essential food per district. Note the chart shows total of male and female
CDGs for each district

Since the flooding began on 28th March, negative coping strategies are already being reported as households attempt to
address their food needs. Eating fewer meals per day, reducing meal size, selling livestock and poultry and purchasing food
on credit were reported in all districts by both male and female CGDs.

                                                                                                                                  19
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

                                                  OVERALL          MALE        FEMALE         Kishoreganj       Netrokona        Sunamganj         Sylhet
 Eating fewer meals per day                         2.07           0.93          1.15             0.39            0.54              0.78            0.37
 Eating smaller meals (reduced meal                 0.98           0.52          0.46             0.19            0.26              0.24            0.30
 size)
 Selling livestock and poultry                       0.85          0.54           0.41            0.26              0.26             0.31           0.04
 Purchasing food on credit                           0.54          0.28           0.26            0.07              0.00             0.07           0.39
 Reducing food consumption to                        0.28          0.07           0.20            0.06              0.11             0.07           0.04
 feed children
 Borrowing money at high interest                    0.26          0.20           0.06            0.09              0.02             0.07           0.07
Figure 7: Main coping strategies reported by CGDs (by gender and district)

The figure above shows the more frequently reported coping strategies. Selling advance labour, migration, selling
household possessions, eating less preferred food, and male family members migrating to find job opportunities were also
reported but less often than those above.
23 CGDs (12 male and 9 female) reported that they have taken a new loan/credit. The 1st source is Money Lender (9 CGD),
then Family/Relatives (8 CGDs) and Neighbours (5 CGDs). The interest rate has increased for around 25% of them

Livelihoods and Income
Baseline
About 15 million people live in the haor region in Bangladesh. 80% of them depend for their livelihoods on boro rice
cropping and fishing. The haor region produces 18% of Bangladesh’s rice and makes up of 6% of GDP.
According to government statistics (2014), 55% of the population were landless with the most marginalized depending on
physical labour in agriculture and fisheries. Seasonal wage labour was the main occupation for the majority people (37.5%),
the second most prevalent occupation was labour on agriculture farming (27.12%)19. 20% of people work in fishing.
In all four districts, the dependency on low value livelihood strategies are substantially high. Around 55% households are
engaged in agriculture; one in five households have unskilled day labour and around 27% population lives below the
poverty line. The limited livelihoods opportunities constrain the purchasing power of the households which, according to
the IPC food security classifications fall into Level 3 (Moderate) & 4 (Severe) in Chronic Food Insecurity.20
This lack of suitable alternative livelihoods people makes people susceptible to shocks.
There is very limited presence of financial institutions in the affected areas. Physical cash distribution is possible. Most of
the organisations planning for a response are planning for one month of multi-purpose cash grant. Mobile money transfer
is too costly and too lengthy for one instalment.
Human capital is limited due to low literacy rates, lack of adult education with literacy rate at 43%. This is a strong barrier
for economic development and in terms of acquiring technical skills for a better livelihood.
Moreover, recurrent natural disasters such as flash floods in the haor areas frequently worsen the acute food insecurity
which then impacts chronic food insecurity.
In the haor areas, the most affected people are marginal farmers and day labourers. According to the GoB statistics (2014),
55% of the population is absolutely landless and the most marginalized living depends on the physical labour in agriculture
field and fisheries. The seasonal wage labour was the main occupation for the majority of people (37.5%), second
occupation was labour 27.12% on agriculture farming and 20% was fishing. While the potential loss of crops by farmers in
the region is estimated to be around 879,360 MT, the farm labourers who are seasonally employed in these areas to harvest
the rice have lost around 263,808,000 person/day work (Nirapad situation report, May 4). Therefore, Cash Grant support
targeting the most affected households is recommended to help people resume their livelihoods and avoid negative coping
strategies.
Beside this, restoration of livelihoods is hampered due to lack of livelihood assets and financial resources to the affected
people. The early restoration of livelihoods and productive assets are essential steps towards recovery for the disaster-

19 Seasonal labour is predominantly for the harvest (and therefore time sensitive) while agricultural labour is the routine maintenance (weeding etc.)
20 IPC Chronic Food Insecurity Situation in 10 districts of Bangladesh - December 2015-2018/20
                                                                                                                                                         20
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

affected communities. This has been particularly important and urgent for the affected population who are heavily
dependent on the agriculture and day labouring (both agriculture and non-agriculture). The affected people need to wait
for rehabilitation of roads and bridges, and prepare the land for the next agricultural season. Therefore, rehabilitation of
community infrastructure using local labour could help create alternative income sources for the affected people.

Impact and needs
This year, the floods came three weeks earlier than usual. An estimated 404,713 ha of croplands ready for harvesting and
305 tons of fodder for livestock was destroyed, and 2 thousand metric tons of fish and thousands of ducks have died21.
877,171 farmers have been affected. The estimated damage to crops is over 30 billion BDT22.
It is estimated that 263,808,000 days of seasonal daily labour on the harvest have been lost. (Nirapad situation report, May
4).
Large numbers of people who reside in the worst affected upazilas have incomes based on agriculture and fishing activities,
including daily labourers. When asked about the main occupations of the people at the site, 43 CGDs reported day labour
(agricultural and non-agricultural), 42 CGDs reported marginal/small famers, 27 groups reported day labour for fishing and
15 CGDs reported livestock. Most of the people have multiple activities. In the haor areas, the most affected people are
marginal farmers and day labourers. All community groups reported loss of livelihoods. These people have been seriously
impacted by the floods. The most impacted livelihood groups are the small and marginal farmers (52 of CGDs reported this
group to be impacted), agricultural day labour (48 CGDs), medium & big farmers (40 CGDs), fishermen (35 CGDs) and non-
agricultural day labour (24 GCDs).
The main impact on agriculture is on boro rice, which was considered severe23 by all the 54 CGDs, followed by fodder for
46 CGDs, then fisheries and then livestock. The reported likely impacts of this crop damage on immediate and long term
household food security will be no seed for cultivation of next crop (54 CGDs), no food stock for next 3 months (52 CDGs)
and loss of secure income (51 CGDs).
Across all districts, community groups expressed concern over how long it would take to resume livelihood activities. 51
CGDs (out of a total of 54) mentioned that their previous livelihood activities were expected to resume after 3 months or
more.

                Major Challenges for Resumption of Livelihoods
 100%
   90%
   80%
   70%
   60%
   50%
   40%
   30%
   20%
   10%
    0%
                  Kishoreganj                   Netrakona                     Sunamganj                       Sylhet

                     Lack of Agricultural inputs                    Lack of alternative source of income
                     Lack of financial resources                    Lack of infrastructure
                     Livelihood assets and financial resources

Figure 8: Major challenges related to livelihood resumption in the flood affected areas

The majority of both male and female CGDs reported that food, fodder, agricultural subsidy and agricultural inputs were
priority needs for in restoring food and livelihood status over the next six months. Agricultural inputs were specified as

21 Department of Disaster Management (DDM), Department of Agriculture Extension and Department of Fisheries
22 DDM
23 Explanation of severity: Severe damage- 50% damaged; Moderate damage- 20-50% damaged; Least damaged- less than 20% damaged

                                                                                                                                21
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

seed (homestead, rice), fertilizer, fishing equipment (boat, fishing net) and cash support. Alternative income generating
activities, and market stabilisation were also seen as needs of the affected communities along with infrastructure repairs
including the reconstruction of embankments and culverts, opening of the water body and river dredging.

                       Map 6: Hectares of crop land affected Upazila wise (produced by NIRAPAD)

                       Map 3: Proportion of cropland affected Upazila wise (produced by NIRAPAD)

Response information

                                                                                                                        22
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

The Government of Bangladesh has targeted 330,000 households to provide Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) registration
cards. Under this social safety net, each family receives 30 kg rice and cash 500 BDT every month until the next harvesting
season (March 2018). The remaining 520,088 affected households will receive a GR of rice and cash and cash through the
Employment Generation Program for Poorest scheme.
BRAC has responded by providing fodder, rice and cash (same package for cash as the GoB). A few INGOs are planning to
respond.

Food security and livelihoods response lessons learnt:
            In 2012 in after the flash floods in Sylhet all the markets were functional again very quickly as is the usual
             pattern in Bangladesh after a disaster. This implies that if affected households are given cash grants, they can
             access all the survival materials.
            In flash flood prone areas farmers use raised seedbeds which will have had a significant impact in preventing
             losses24 so this needs to be investigated.

Recommendations
Immediate response:
    Multi-Purpose Cash Grant (1st choice)
            o Area: all affected districts, only affected upazilas and unions
            o Selection criteria: as defined in the MPCG guideline25
            o Exclusion of HH targeted by GoB
            o Duration: 4-5 months
    Other proposed recommendations:
            o Emergency School Feeding in the flood affected schools
            o Fodder and other animal food for the livestock
            o Destocking of animal, at the price before the floods
Early Recovery/medium to longer term response
      Alternate Income Generating Activities
      Cash for work to support food assistance (after the monsoon) and infrastructure rehabilitation – should not
         compete with agricultural seasonal activities
      Longer term programme in livelihood with a study to explore the various livelihoods options existing and potential
         opportunities
Advocacy
    Advocacy issues can be addressed through the Haor Advocacy Platform (HAP)
    Crop insurance
    Cancellation of lease of water bodies for one year
    Soft loan for the most vulnerable
    Diversification of rice varieties: traditional, shorter term, flood immerged
Monitoring
    Market prices and market stabilization
    GoB suspension of loan repayment

Information gaps and recommended assessments
            No additional assessment. Communities mentioned their fatigue of assessment without any support
            Sectoral assessment to be determined at a later stage based on the situation
            Points selling Open Market Sales (OMS) rice and flour have not been adequately stocked. The OMS operation that
             began on 9 April failed to take into account how many ultra-poor families26 were affected in the region.
             Additionally, allegations have arisen that unscrupulous middlemen are selling off OMS rice to local restaurants
             (The Daily Star, April 26). Proper headcount of ultra-poor households that have been affected must be calculated
             and relief distribution must be monitored.

24   Sylhet JNA 2012
25 See http://www.cashlearning.org/downloads/guidelines-on-mpg--final--april-24-2017-1.pdf
26   Defined as the group of people who eat below 80% of their energy requirements despite spending at least 80% of income on food.
                                                                                                                                      23
Floods in Northeast (haor) areas of Bangladesh April-May 2017

Market access

        There was a market observed in most of the sites visited27 or located nearby (22 sites out of 27). Almost of all of
         the markets were functioning (21 sites out of 22) with sufficient quantity and variety of food available (15 sites
         out of 21); four sites did not normally have markets and in two sites the markets were not functioning. Assessment
         teams found that prices in 26 markets had increased: 17 sites by 10-20% and prices in 8 by more than 20%. Access
         to market is an issue for 16 Community Group Discussion (CGDs, 6 male and 10 female).

Access, Infrastrucure and Early Recovery Concerns

Key findings
        Marginal farmers and agricultural and non-agricultural labourers are found as the most affected section of the
         population, therefore, Cash Assistance targeting the most affected households is recommended to help people
         resume their livelihoods and avoid negative coping strategies. Approximately 72% of assessed population stated
         inability to resume their main income generating activities due to lack of livelihood assets and financial resources.
        Community infrastructure is one of the major challenges for response and recovery interventions. Cash for Work
         (CFW), Food for Work (FFW) and other safety net programmes is recommended to rehabilitate essential
         community infrastructures including roads, culverts and embankments with the deployment of local labourers to
         support early recovery of affected community. Timing for CFW, FFW needs to consider labour demand for
         upcoming agriculture season.
        Build Back Better approach should be considered during repairing and rehabilitating community infrastructure
         considering the existing vulnerabilities of the affected areas. Linking early recovery resources and interventions
         (such as cash/food for work) to shelter reconstruction will provide added advantage and should be considered,
         therefore.

Community infrastructure
Access and transport is a major issue in the haor area. Most linking roads were submerged at the time of the assessment
and movement is mainly only possible by boat. Lack of transportation is hampering response activities and recovery of
livelihoods, education, health and other sectors. Construction and reconstruction of essential community infrastructure is
emphasized for early recovery of communities and the local economy. Deployment of local labours during repairing and
rehabilitation of essential community infrastructures will be an important way to increase employment opportunities of
the affected people and promote recovery of affected communities. A build Back Better approach also needs to be
considered along with how to best address the existing vulnerabilities of the affected areas.

Recommendations
Short Term Recommendation (Off-Farm Livelihoods)
        Off-Farm livelihood inputs and cash support to the affected families for resumption of livelihoods
        Cash for training for off-farm livelihood interventions
Mid-Term Recommendation (Community Infrastructure)
        Reconstruction and repair of community infrastructures (such as roads and embankments) using local labourers
        Creation of alternative income generation opportunities.
        Raising school grounds, graveyards and bazars which can also uses as community place
        Slope protection to save community infrastructure from wave action
        Capacity building of local community for regular operation of cross drainage structures
        Introduce green technology for protection from wave erosion

27 From the Direct Observation questionnaire
                                                                                                                            24
You can also read