CAGNE COMMUNITIES AGAINST GATWICK NOISE AND EMISSIONS - Alfold ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CAGNE COMMUNITIES AGAINST GATWICK NOISE AND EMISSIONS
CAGNE
• CAGNE History and Credentials
• CAGNE formed out of residents anger towards ADNID new flight path trial over
areas not previously flown over – Feb-August 2014
• CAGNE has evolved and now represents residents across West Sussex, as well as
some parts of Surrey, and oppose new flight paths and Gatwick’s 2nd runway
• CAGNE conducted the only research into concentrated flight paths (PBN/ PRNAV)
during ADNID and employed an independent noise company that now questions
Gatwick’s population and noise figures.
• CAGNE is currently supported by 11 Parish Councils, CPRE Sussex, and works with
other aviation groups around Gatwick and the world.
• CAGNE have been constructive in its approach and continues to meets with senior
management of the CAA, NATS, GAL and DfT.
• CAGNE works closely with local MPs, district and county councillors
• CAGNE attend GATCOM – the Gatwick liaison group
• CAGNE are independent, made up of residents from many sectors of industry
www.cagne.org www.facebook.com/gatwickcagne Twitter @cagne_gatwick
LONDON IS SERVED BY 5 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS
CREATING ONE OF THE BUSIEST AIRSPACES IN THE
WORLD
CAA/ NATS/ DfT/ GAL Current noise ruling on departures – Noise is the number one consideration up to 4,000ft From 4,000-7,000ft noise and CO2 are traded From 7,000ft CO2 is the only consideration Arrivals has no fixed guidance apart from CDA and saving CO2 which leads to stabilisation
PRNAV/ PBN • FAS – FUTURE AIRSPACE STRATEGY • LAMP CONSULTED ON IN 2014. WILL RETURN IN 2019 • CONCENTRATION IMPLEMENTED BY 2020 • GOVERNMENT POLICY – ‘to significantly reduce the number of people affected by aircraft noise’
BOGNA AND SAM DEPARTURES
– 2013 WITH DISPERSAL
BOGNA AND SAM DEPARTURES
– 2014 with PRNAV
SIR ROY MCNULTY REVIEW • A review by independent aviation experts • It is now to include Easterly Arrivals due to CAGNE • CAGNE are pushing for a review of Westerly Departures as well • CAGNE are making a difference with the aim of making communities voices heard
EASTERLY ARRIVALS USING NATS DETAILS TO CREATE A ZONE MAP FOR ARRIVALS USING AGREED METHODOLOGY WITH NATS FOR DEPARTURES • RESULTS CLEARLY SHOW ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENTS • MOVE ARRIVALS WEST AND SOUTH OF BILLINGSHURST • MAPS SHOWS HOW AT PRESENT LARGE POPULATIONS ARE DIRECTLY OVERFLOWN IN A CONCENTRATED MANNER • THE GREEN TRACK ILLUSTRATES THE MINIMUM DISTURBANCE AS IT DOES NOT TOUCH ANY CIRCLES OF POPULATION • THE BLACK LINE IS SUGGESTED AS A LIMITING BOUNDARY PATH. IT MODESTLY INTERSECTS CIRCLES BUT IF CONDUCTED ON A LESS FREQUENT BASIS MIGHT BE MORE TOLERABLE THAN CURRENT SITUATION • THE DOTTED RED LINE IS THE CURRENT MAIN PATH OF ARRIVALS WHICH IMPACTS ALL POPULATION CIRCLES.
CAGNE SOLUTION – EASTERLY
ARRIVALSEASTERLY ARRIVALS NOW FROM AFAR AND HOLDING STACKS
EASTERLY ARRIVALS 2010
EASTERLY ARRIVALS 2015 – concentration of vectoring and a move of 2m away from runway/ join of ILS
NATS over the last year has increased stabilisation run in length on west and east of
Gatwick. In the west this has led to a concentration over Plaistow, Loxwood, Ifold,
Billingshurst concentrating noise. CAGNE suggest widening out the swathe from the
current normal of about 2miles to 4 miles. This would increase the area for turning
planes and lead to lower concentration and noise.Suggestion is to increase the width of the swathe which looks like this below
and is already flown by NATS some days so is possible and still allows space
for redefining and reducing noise further.EASTERLY ARRIVALS – THE CAGNE SOLUTION
CDA ARRIVALS – FIXED HEIGHT TO GLIDE PATH - USE
ADDITIONAL AREA IN PINKPRNAV/ PBN • FAS – FUTURE AIRSPACE STRATEGY • LAMP CONSULTED ON IN 2014. WILL RETURN IN 2019 • CONCENTRATION IMPLEMENTED BY 2020 • GOVERNMENT POLICY – ‘to significantly reduce the number of people affected by aircraft noise’
ADNID WAS THE FIRST TIME RESIDENTS EXPERIENCED PRNAV
CONCENTRATION CREATES A LARGER
NOISE WALL
• Dispersal – shared impact of noise
• PRNAV – concentration of aircraft continuously
down one line
• PRNAV/ PBN can be used to benefit residents
• ‘One size does not fit all’ theory
• Noise number one consideration up to 6,000ft –
currently 4,000ft
• Residents given same consideration as airlines
and airports profits/ efficiencyGOVERNMENT POLICY • Currently - ‘to reduce the number significantly affected by aircraft noise’ which includes concentration • Reality concentration creates noise ‘ghettos’ and is unbearable to those on the ground • It creates a wall of noise which is far reaching compared to dispersal • The aviation law of 1921/2 needs to change to protect residents from aviation • A noise authority that has powers to protect communities, that is independent from aviation and has real powers is required (Airports Commission 2015) • Real compensation is required, paid for by the aviation industry – not double glazing, etc
SUPPORT CAGNE IN CREATING A BALANCE BETWEEN AVIATION AND RURAL/TRANQUIL COMMUNITIES
NO 2ND RUNWAY
• Gatwick 2nd Runway will create:-
• Unbearable increase of aircraft noise to tens of thousands of Horsham district residents with no
compensation to those that chose to live in rural areas with very little ambient noise – 30-
35decibels. Urban areas have 70-80decibel noise constantly. Gatwick will go from 250,000 flights a
year to 560,000.
• Grid locked roads and overcrowded railways – Horsham district has endured little infrastructure
upgrade and is already a congested area which in turn creates more pollution and health issues
• Demand for 20,000 (1) houses will pave over green countryside. This figure is questionable as AC
state 32,500(3) ‘low skilled’ workers to start, which general means low paid workers who need to
live in affordable housing close to the airport
• Loss to future generations of green open space and heritage – this would be an irreversible
urbanisation of our precious rural areas (recreating the Heathrow suburbs - polluted, congested,
overcrowded, mass urbanisation)
• 32,500 jobs needed to start ... in an area that has over 7,000 vacancies currently in a 10 mile radius
to Gatwick
• How many school places will be required? Lack of medical facilities and health care is a major
concern now. Will businesses relocate in West Sussex? Will new businesses want to be in a
congested area with a lack of staff?
• Airport Commission
Mayor of Crawley statement 22/11/14 Airport Commission 2.54INDICATIVE NEW FLIGHT PATHS OFF A NEW
RUNWAY
Seven Oaks
Guildford Dorking
Reigate
Redhill Tonbridge
Lingfield
Godalming Horley
Copthorne Royal
East Grinstead Tunbridge
Crawley Down,
Rusper Crawley Turners Hill
Wells
West Hoathley
Warnham
Horsham Handcross Crowborough
Balcombe
Wisborough
Green Billingshurst
Haywards
Heath
Burgess HillNOISE IMPACT FOR WEST SUSSEX
SUPPORT CAGNE • BY SUPPORTING CAGNE YOU ARE • ENABLING CAGNE TO KEEP YOU INFORMED OF AIRSPACE CHANGES THAT WILL AFFECT YOUR COMMUNITY • CAGNE CAN HELP YOU AND YOUR RESIDENTS TO UNDERSTAND COMPLEX AVIATION DOCUMENTS • CAGNE HAS MORE POWER TO TALK WITH THOSE IN A POSITION OF AUTHORITY
You can also read
