Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI

Page created by Josephine Hall
 
CONTINUE READING
Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI
FILOZOFICKÁ FAKULTA

Check'em: An Analysis
of Online Group Identity
       on 4Chan

         Bakalářská diplomová práce

           OLDŘICH CHMELA

 Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Jan Chovanec, Ph.D.

      Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky
       Obor Anglický jazyk a literatura

                  Brno 2021
Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI
Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI
Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Bibliografický záznam

Autor:              Oldřich Chmela
                    Filozofická fakulta
                    Masarykova univerzita
                    Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky
Název práce:        Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan
Studijní program:   FF B-FI Filologie, bakalářský studijní program
Studijní obor:      Anglický jazyk a literatura
Vedoucí práce:      doc. Mgr. Jan Chovanec, Ph.D.
Rok:                2021
Počet stran:        69
Klíčová slova:      4chan, počítačově zprostředkovaný diskurz, online skupinová
                    identita, hnutí incel

2
Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan - OLDŘICH CHMELA Bakalářská diplomová práce - IS MUNI
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Bibliographic record

Author:             Oldřich Chmela
                    Faculty of Arts
                    Masaryk University
                    Department of English and American Studies
Title of Thesis:    Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group Identity on 4Chan
Degree Programme: FF B-FI Philology, Bachelor's degree programme
Field of Study:     FF AJ English Language and Literature
Supervisor:         doc. Mgr. Jan Chovanec, Ph.D.
Year:               2021
Number of Pages:    69
Keywords:           4chan, computer-mediated discourse, linguistics, online group
                    identity, incels

                                                                                    3
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Anotace

Tato bakalářská práce popisuje a analyzuje diskusní fórum 4chan.org, jeho obecnou

lingvistickou stránku, lexikon a jeho morfologický systém. Vysvětluje i jeho historický

kontext. Prezentuje mechanismy, kterými se diskurs na 4chanu řídí. Dále podrobně

vysvětluje důležité koncepty, které jsou k porozumění informací na této stránce třeba

znát, jako například koncept CMD. Zvláštní důraz je kladen na funkci čísel, jež mají na

tomto fóru svoji speciální roli. Konkrétněji popsáno je také slovo faggot a jeho

morfologie, jejíž analýza poskytuje hlubší pochopení slovotvorbě a slovníku, jež

uživatelé 4chanu užívají. Dále je práce doplněna o korpusovou analýzu, která se věnuje

především frekvenční analýze, kolokacím a kontextu, v jakém jsou jednotlivá slova

užívána. Práce bere v potaz také politické a sociologické implikace obsahu diskusí i

korpusu. Nakonec je ještě pro úplnost informací práce rozšířena glosářem, kde jsou

stručnou formou vysvětleny vybrané termíny specifické pro 4chan.

4
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Abstract

This thesis discusses and analyses the overall linguistic atmosphere, vocabulary and

the morphological system of the discussion forum 4chan.org. The historical context is

also discussed. It also explains the mechanisms that affect the discourse on the forum.

Important concepts such as CMD and others, necessary understand its specific form of

discourse are explained. Special focus is given to the function of numbers, which play

a special role within 4chan’s user dynamics. Extra focus is given to the lemma faggot

and its morphology, which in turn provides for a deeper understanding 4chan’s

lexicon. Political implications, stemming from the contents of the forums as well as the

corpus are discussed. Additionally, the thesis contains a corpus analysis which works

with frequency analysis, collocations, and the context in which are the most frequently

used words utilised. Finally, the thesis is accompanied by a glossary which includes a

selection of the most important keywords and describes them in a brief way.

                                                                                      5
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Declaration

I hereby declare that this thesis with title Check'em: An Analysis of Online Group
Identity on 4Chan I submit for assessment is entirely my own work and has not been
taken from the work of others save to the extent that such work has been cited and
acknowledged within the text of my thesis.

Brno May 16, 2021                                        .......................................
                                                            Oldřich Chmela

                                                                                                   7
CHECK'EM: AN ANALYSIS OF ONLINE GROUP IDENTITY ON 4CHAN

Acknowledgements

      I would like to thank all my family members for being supportive throughout the

whole process of my writing this bachelor’s thesis. I would also like to thank my friends

for their equally important moral support, as well as the teachers and other staff

members of the Department of English and American Studies for their help, patience

and understanding.

Šablona DP 3.2.2-ARTS-dipl-obor-anglicky (2021-04-29) © 2014, 2016, 2018–2021 Masarykova univerzita   9
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

List of Figures                                                                                                                                 13

List of Tables                                                                                                                                  13

Glossary                                                                                                                                        15

1      Introduction                                                                                                                             17
    1.1     Computer-mediated discourse .................................................................................... 18

2      Methodology                                                                                                                              20
    2.1     General overview of the topic, choice of material ................................................ 20
    2.2     Technical aspects of corpus creation ........................................................................ 20
    2.3     Overview of the corpus contents ................................................................................ 21
    2.4     Preliminary analysis of the corpus ............................................................................. 22

3      Historical, technical and cultural background                                                                                            24
    3.1     Historical background ..................................................................................................... 24
    3.2     User demographics ........................................................................................................... 26

4      4chan’s characteristic phenomena and mechanisms                                                                                          28
    4.1     Temporariness ................................................................................................................... 28
    4.2     Bumping ............................................................................................................................... 29
    4.3     Archiving efforts ................................................................................................................ 30
    4.4     User moderation, janitors .............................................................................................. 31
    4.5     User identity........................................................................................................................ 32
    4.6     Post IDs ............................................................... Chyba! Záložka není definována.
    4.7     Dubs, trips and other discourse-altering numerals ............................................. 35
    4.8     Check’em, Mr. Bateman .................................................................................................. 36
    4.9     Links to the incel movement ........................................................................................ 38
    4.10 Tits or GTFO and 4chan’s misogyny .......................................................................... 40
    4.11 Other forms of user identification .............................................................................. 42

5      Morphological and stylistic aspects of the forum                                                                                         43
    5.1     The curious case of the word fag ................................................................................ 43

                                                                                                                                                     11
TABLE OF CONTENTS

    5.2       Newfags and oldfags ........................................................................................................46
    5.3 Stylistic elements of the forum .........................................................................................47
    5.3.1 Reddit-spacing .....................................................................................................................48
    5.3.2 Greentext ...............................................................................................................................50
    5.3.3 MFW ........................................................................................................................................52

6 Political implications of the forum’s contents                                                                                                  53

7 Conclusion                                                                                                                                      57

7       Discussion                                                                                                                                59
    8.1 Study limitations ....................................................................................................................59
    8.2 Further research ....................................................................................................................60

Bibliography                                                                                                                                      61

Summary                                                                                                                                           66

Resumé                                                                                                                                            67

12
LIST OF FIGURES

List of Figures

   Figure 1 - Post 222222222 (Anonymous, 2019)...............................................................33
   Figure 2 - GET Post 88869 (Anonymous, 2010)................................................................34
   Figure 3 - Check’em, Post 193798577 (Anonymous, 2010) .........................................38
   Figure 4 - 9384163 – Anon is gay (Anonymous, 2020) .................................................51
   Figure 5 - 1223025 – Anon is Korean” (Anonymous, 2017) .......................................54

                                                                                                            13
LIST OF TABLES

List of Tables

     Table 1 - most frequent nouns, verb and adjectives in the corpus ............................22
     Table 2 - chances of obtaining a rare post ID (The Digit Advisory Page, n.d) ........36
     Table 3 – most frequent nouns containing the -fag suffix .............................................44
     Table 4 – random concordance of the lemma faggot.......................................................45
     Table 5 – most frequent collocations of lemma faggot ...................................................46
     Table 6 - a random sample of sentences and utterances ...............................................48

14
GLOSSARY

Glossary

thread        – a self-contained discussion which may or may not have a title
catalog       – an overview of all of the currently active threads on a specific
                board
board         – a sub-forum, generally dedicated to a singular topic, for example
                /pol/ for politics or /fit/ for fitness
OP            – OP is a short version of opening / original post. In the context of
                4chan’s discourse, OP refers to the user who created the thread by
                submitting their post. It is universally understood that OP is a fag.
bump          – an act of replying to someone else’s post in order to push the
                thread closer to the beginning of the catalog
selfbump      – same as bump, only this time it is the OP doing the bumping
sage          – from Japanese sageru, when put into the respective field, it will
                push the thread further back in the catalog, effectively giving the
                users a way to rid the board of an unwanted thread
fag, faggot   – an user of 4chan. used also a suffix to express affiliation with a
                certain group or character qualities, i.e. christfag, animefag and
                so on
tard          – similarly to fag, tard may also be used to create a portmanteau
                of sorts, such as /b/tard – in this case an user hailing from the
                /b/ board, dedicated to random topics.
imageboard    – a forum, primarily used for sharing pictures
chan          – channel, alternative word for an imageboard
(to) lurk     – to only browse the boards without participating
lurker        – users who lurk, see above
moar          – a spelling variant of the word more, frequently used by 4chan’s
                members
post ID       – string of numerals, assigned randomly to every post
GET           – marks a milestone post with a rare post ID combination, or signifies
                the user’s attempt to obtain one
roll          – similar to get, users could be rolling for a post with a rare com-
                bination of numbers

                                                                                  15
GLOSSARY

tripcode    – a way to establish an identity on 4chan, a unique sort of password
              which serves as a form of identification for the website
tripfag     – user of 4chan who decides to use a tripcode, which will be dis-
              played next to their posts. Usually faced with hostile behaviour
              towards them, most users simply remain anonymous. Only a few
              tripfags were tolerated on 4chan, some of which retain a celeb-
              rity status
moot        – nickname of the creator of 4chan, Christopher Poole
vidya       – a spelling variation of the word videogames
anime       – Japanese animated cartoons
manga       – Japanese comics
blueboard   – a board where no NSWF content is allowed
NSFW        – not safe for work, opposite of above      –      [Definice]
SWF         – safe for work, permissible content

16
INTRODUCTION

1 Introduction

The subject of this thesis is 4chan.org, one of the internet’s most well-known

discussion forums. Contrary to its ever-rising popularity, it is considered quite

controversial. There are multiple reasons behind this claim. Certain aspects of the

forum are politically incorrect and could be even described as outright extremist. It is

also thought to be mostly used by male users of with little to no diversity, and as such

it is prone to becoming an echo-chamber. But while controversial, is still a unique

platform, something that no traditional form of media could ever match. And as such,

it contents provide an intriguing source material for a study.

    This thesis therefore aims to provide a general analysis of its linguistic

atmosphere, lexicon, and sociological aspects contained within the forum. By

describing the unique communicative methods and styles employed by its users,

provides the reader with the tools necessary for understanding the somewhat cryptic

information the forum contains. Special attention is given to all the phenomena that

are crucial to understand in order to navigate and participate in the discourse, with

extra focus on the meaning of post IDs, the temporary nature of all its content and the

technical vocabulary used within its boards. In order to achieve that, a special passage

dedicated to various blends and portmanteaus related to the omnipresent lemma

faggot shall provide the reader with a brief overview of the lexical system of the forum.

    4chan does also have an active community of volunteer moderators, who

complement the self-policing methods enforced by the inherent rules of every board,

these mechanisms shall be analysed in a separate part of the thesis.

                                                                                      17
INTRODUCTION

      Finally, the thesis takes advantage of both author’s empirical findings, gathered

by both actively participating in the discussions while gathering posts relevant to the

research and a sample corpus, counting roughly 10 million words and created using

data provided by Bibliotheca Anonoma, an online archive of internet folklore, which

was subsequently analysed using the Sketch Engine tool. Data obtained by this analysis

shall be used to further support the claims presented in the thesis.

1.1     Computer-mediated discourse

In order to communicate on 4chan, and the internet in general, the users have to work

within a specific mode of communication. With the style of discourse being dictated by

the methods and technology employed in order to transmit their messages, and the

inherent impossibility to employ gestures, auditory cues or facial expression, it may

seem heavily restricted.

      Prominent linguists working in this field, such as Susan Herring, recognise it

under the term computer-mediated discourse. In the 2000 journal article of the same

name, Herring describes it as “a specialization within the broader interdisciplinary

study of computer-mediated communication”. While acknowledging the inadequacies

stemming from the inability to fully employ all the devices offered by face-to-face

communication, Herring still argues that “CMD can be richly expressive” (Herring,

2000). Crystal’s Internet linguistics: a student guide then notes that there may be more

similarities between the computer-mediated way of communication and actual speech,

claiming that some aspects of CMD “…display much of the urgency and energetic force

18
INTRODUCTION

which is characteristic of face-to-face conversation” (Crystal, 2011). The phenomena

further described in this thesis support these conclusions. For the sake of brevity,

Herring uses the acronym CMD when referring to computer-mediated discourse, and

for the purposes of this thesis, the same acronym shall be henceforth used as well.

    However, familiarity with the concept of CMD is insufficient on its own, as it only

describes a general framework. In order to understand the origins of the distinctive

style of CMD employed by 4chan’s users, a deeper understanding of internet history

and 4chan’s background is needed.

                                                                                      19
METHODOLOGY

2 Methodology

2.1     General overview of the topic, choice of material

The corpus was created by utilising the data offered on Archive.org, created over the

course of August 2019 and uploaded to the interned by the members of Bibliotheca

Anonoma, a “research task force archiving, documenting, and safeguarding Internet

Folklife” (Bibliotheca Anonoma, n.d.).

      Out of the 167 separate archives, each representing a different part of the forum,

a 6-gigabyte file named b.csv.bz2 was chosen. My reasoning behind choosing this

particular file was the fact that it represents the /b/ Random board – the term board

being the official term for each particular part of the forum unified by a certain topic.

As hinted in its name, the Random board does not have a pre-set topic, and as such it

serves as a suitable and representative basis for the subsequent creation of the corpus.

2.2     Technical aspects of corpus creation

Upon the extraction of the b.csv.bz2 file, I was presented with 30 gigabytes of raw data.

Using Microsoft Excel’s Import data function, I have loaded the file into the program.

The contents of the archive did not only consist of text, and therefore I had to limit

Excel’s output to only load one column containing the actual user-submitted posts. I

capped the output to 500000 entries due to the technical constrains of both Excel and

Sketch Engine, my concordancer of choice. The raw data was unfortunately

20
METHODOLOGY

contaminated by a great number of illegible symbols, a problem probably caused by

the computer script used by the coders of Bibliotheca Anonoma in order to scrape the

contents of the website. Therefore, I have decided to filter the output even more,

exporting the file out of Excel and moving it to Notepad ++, an advanced text editor.

There, I was finally able to remove unwanted entries. Using the expression ^\d{7,12},

I managed to delete all the numbers greater than 8 decimal places, which would

logically be the post numbers. Since they seemed to be embedded together with the

text posts, they had to be removed in order to obtain a clean and legible corpus. This

way, some of the posts directly referencing post numbers would be removed, but I was

able to find relevant information regarding the mechanics of numerals in the 4chan

GET Encyclopedia hosted on the LURKMORE Wiki. After exporting a clean .txt file out of

Notepad ++, I was finally able to load it into the Sketch Engine concordancer.

2.3     Overview of the corpus contents

The corpus consists roughly of 10000000 (ten million) words, or 1200000 tokens.

There are only 475000 recognised sentences, pointing at the somewhat reduced

grammatical system of 4chan’s users who tend to use short, concise replies, sometimes

only one-word long.

      Using the wordlist function, I have gathered a table consisting of the most

frequently used nouns, verbs and adjectives, listing the first 20 of each category with

absolute frequency, representing the actual number of their occurrences within the

                                                                                    21
METHODOLOGY

corpus. For some reason, the concordancer includes the pronoun I as the top entry, no

matter the settings, and I ascribe that to a software error.

 Nr.       Nouns    Frequency       Verbs      Frequency       Adjectives        Frequency

 1      I           59635           be         459413          good              32259
 2      pol         30822           do         122223          more              15575
 3      shit        27530           have       73546           other             11792
 4      op          26003           get        62565           bad               10067
 5      fuck        24884           fuck       41094           nice              9148
 6      thread      23908           go         29536           same              8867
 7      faggot      22398           know       29485           old               7771
 8      time        22195           make       25220           new               7327
 9      people      19361           think      25089           first             7189
 10     [url]       19361           see        24451           big               7006
 11     girl        17563           say        21953           little            6926
 12     roll        17519           look       19853           [number]          6825
 13     guy         17216           take       18001           real              6648
 14     man         14693           try        15068           last              6095
 15     thing       14582           post       14323           white             5828
 16     nigger      13366           give       13840           only              5473
 17     year        12875           come       13810           hot               5455
 18     dick        12044           use        13262           hard              5340
 19     life        11626           need       13047           few               5303
 20     day         11517           like       12330           much              5113
              Table 1 - most frequent nouns, verb and adjectives in the corpus

2.4    Preliminary analysis of the corpus

Without any previous knowledge of the contents and nature of the forum, the reader

may immediately take notice of the fact that especially the category of most-frequently

used nouns is quite offensive and 25% of the top nouns are expletives or derogatory

terms. Then there are slang terms, such as pol or op, which are not understandable

without deeper knowledge of 4chan’s lexicon. The word fuck takes the fifth place both

22
METHODOLOGY

as a verb and as a noun, which may indicate that this forum is frequented by more men

than women, at least when we take in account some of the linguistic research claiming

that as “a whole, male speakers use fuck more than twice as frequently as female

speakers, a difference that is statistically significant” (McEnery & Xiao, 2004). Same

results were found by Baker, who states that “male speakers used the strong swear

word fuck / fucking more”, some 10 years after McEnery and Xiao’s journal article

publication date, proving that this trend continues to be true (Baker, 2014). The

frequent use of the noun dick could also point to this conclusion.

Signs of homophobia are also present, as exemplified by the word faggot taking the 7th

place. In addition to that, the fact that an extremely derogatory term nigger happens to

be the 16th most used noun, as well as white being the 15th most used adjective

uncovers the racist and xenophobic tendencies of 4chan’s users, at least when it comes

to their choice of words.

                                                                                     23
HISTORICAL, TECHNICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND

3 Historical, technical and cultural background

Founded by Christopher Poole, also known by “moot, a member of the Something

Awful forums” in 2003 (Bibliotheca Anonoma, n.d.), originally meant as place to share

anime and manga, 4chan is not the only internet forum of its kind, it is simply one of

the most well-known, ranking at position 882 among all websites and at position 56 in

the United Kingdom at the time of writing (4chan.Org Competitive Analysis, Marketing

Mix and Traffic - Alexa, 2021).

3.1     Historical background

The proper term for this kind of text-based forum with the possibility to upload images

is an imageboard or simply a board. Imageboards, or chans, which is an abbreviation

of the word channel, originate in Japan. Forums of this kind started to appear in the

very beginnings of the World Wide Web. The first one of its kind is considered to be

Ayashii’s World, created in the mid-90s, and the collective of Bibliotheca Anonoma

claims that it was “…the first anonymous textboard ever made on the internet. 4chan

(…) is actually a direct descendant, at least when it comes to the code” (History -

Bibliotheca Anonoma, n.d.). Kaigo and Watanabe describe its content as “…mainly

“underground” and “subculture” related, and the contributors usually did not indicate

their names in the name field, so that the community became an anonymous forum”

(Kaigo & Watanabe, 2007).

      In Japan, these forums served as safe space for the users to anonymously express

their opinions, allowing them to momentarily escape their designated societal roles

24
HISTORICAL, TECHNICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND

that were inseparably tied to their identity. Eric Cattelain, author of an article

discussing the concept of this social duality, named uchi-soto, notes that is further

divided into two parts: honne-tatemae, the distinction between what you truly feel and

what you show to others, and omote-ura, loosely translated as front and back. It is

further described as an “intricate sense of who you are and who you are expected to

be, or what you are and are not supposed to say or show others” (Cattelain, 2014). In

the very professional and competitive society, which Japan undoubtedly was and still

is, it is quite difficult to detach oneself from those rigid roles and expectations laid upon

an average individual, especially since they are now an integral part of Japanese

society. It is only logical that the Japanese users flocked to these imageboards, as they

provided a discussion platform where everyone is anonymous and therefore equal.

Consequently, the sense of anonymity so characteristic of Japanese chans would also

become an inherent part of 4chan, as a Western adaptation of this Japanese internet

phenomenon.

     In the Western context, the principles of uchi-soto, hone-tatemae and omote-ura

appear to be closely related to the politeness theory, a concept invented by Stephen

Levinson and Penelope Brown in their 1987 book Politeness: some universals in

language usage. Similarly to uchi-soto, it operates with the idea of face, characterised

as “something that is emotionally invested (…) and must be constantly attended to in

interaction” (Jaworski & Coupland, 1999). Contrasting negative face as “the desire to

be unimpeded in one’s actions”, and positive face as “the desire (in some respects) to

be approved of”, Levinson and Brown consider this concept a global phenomenon.

                                                                                          25
HISTORICAL, TECHNICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND

However, it is also claimed that further explanation is needed in order to apply the

notion of face to different cultures or groups, stating that it is something which in

“…any particular society we would expect to be the subject of much cultural

elaboration” (Brown & Levinson, 1987).

      Therefore, it can be claimed that while imageboards have developed in Japan, a

society radically different in from the Western one in many aspects, they have already

shared a significant part the common concept of face, albeit under a different name and

setting. This concept is also relevant in the way the users interact with each other, and

especially the newcomers, who are not members of the in-group and as such

unacquainted with 4chan’s rules. This other implementation of the theory of politeness

shall be discussed further in the text. However, this is not the only occurrence of a

direct link to the Japanese culture.

3.2     User demographics

According to 4chan.org’s official data, its users, whose ages typically range from 18 to

34, are 70% male and 30% female. The vast majority (up to 70%) is from the United

States of America and other anglophone countries; however, their interests are

frequently linked to “Japanese culture, anime and manga” (Advertise - 4chan, 2020).

      These close ties to Japan and its culture are still clearly visible, not only by the

adoption of the conventions of those early imageboards such as Ayashii’s World, but

also by its contents. Many parts of 4chan deal exclusively with aforementioned

Japanese phenomena. In addition, some of the vocabulary and slang terms used on the

26
HISTORICAL, TECHNICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUND

website are inspired or directly taken from the Japanese language. The results

generated by the keyword analysis of the corpus shows that the fifth most prevalent

one is desu, a Japanese linking verb. Others are directly used as loan words, such as

sage, suffix -san, and more. These lexical aspects of the forum are mentioned further in

the text.

But the integral and predominant traits, shared by all of the users, irrespective of their

nationality, can be seen everywhere on the forum no matter the topic or sub-board.

The omnipresent anonymity, and temporariness.

                                                                                       27
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

4 4chan’s characteristic phenomena and
  mechanisms

4.1     Temporariness

Perhaps the most integral quality of 4chan is the fact that the discussions, or in 4chan’s

lingo, threads, exist only for a certain amount of time. This is one of the aspects that

compensate for the lack of functions inherent to the CMD utilised on the forum.

      Crystal characterizes this temporariness by utilizing Herring’s facet framework,

which is described as “parameters of contrast in relation to which outputs can be

defined and are similar in conception to the notion of design-features”. Using the term

persistence, he explains it as “the period of time that messages remain on the system

after they are received.” (Crystal, 2011).

      For 4chan, this period of time is not very long (minutes or hours, depending on

the board), and it is mandated by the design of the code behind the forum itself. It

guarantees that no matter how popular or how discussed one’s post is, it will

eventually be deleted. The catalog, which serves as an overview of every board,

contains a limited number of currently active threads. They are automatically sorted

by the newest and most popular towards the beginning of the list. Correspondingly,

new posts, posts with little to no replies or very old posts without new activity are

pushed back to the end of the list and eventually replaced by the new ones.

28
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

4.2     Bumping

The users can push new posts towards the top of the page, which is the default position

for new or most discussed topics, by either posting in or bumping the thread. The

difference between simply replying and bumping is that a bump post is always posted

only for the sake of moving the thread upwards in the hierarchy, and increases its

visibility, or rather “spatial centrality” (Davis & Graham, 2021). It is often nonsensical,

has no new information. Sometimes it can be just a picture not necessarily relevant to

the topic.

      Likewise, the users can sage the thread, in case it contains something they dislike.

That can be done simply by entering the word sage into a corresponding field in the

reply window. This act is doing the exact opposite of bumping, pushing the thread

further back, eventually leading to its deletion.

      From a linguistic point of view, bumping would be an equivalent of Jakobson’s

phatic function, only translated to the field of CMD. The OP, 4chan’s abbreviation of the

collocation original poster or opening post, signals an interest to communicate to the

other potential discourse participants. Unable to utilise non-verbal cues, “all the work

of signalling attention and interest during the conversation has to be done by the

textual messages” (Kulkarni, 2014). By moving the thread upwards with his messages,

they keep the communication channel open. This again proves that CMD utilises many

of the same mechanics as the traditional forms of communication, only adopting and

altering them to accommodate for the technological limitations of this online form

conversation.

                                                                                        29
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

      Similarly, temporariness is a characteristic also found in other forms of human

communication. In her book Because Internet, linguist Gretchen McCulloch

appropriately states that “…conversations throughout history have naturally not left

records”. Computer-mediated forms of communication only re-introduce this

temporariness in a contemporary way, with “private messages that vanish after they’re

seen, live video streaming, manual deletion of old posts, and storystyle posts that only

stay visible for twenty-four hours”. These characteristics of CMD “reduce the likelihood

that messages will be encountered outside their intended context” and this is very true

for 4chan as well (McCulloch, 2019). It may therefore not be the first internet forum or

a communication channel to introduce temporariness, but it is one of the few social

networks that utilise it in such a fundamental way.

4.3     Archiving efforts

While the contents of 4chan are deleted regularly, both for the sake of anonymity and

server capacity, some chosen boards or threads are archived for a certain amount of

time. However, they mostly serve as a source of general information and rules for each

board, and do not usually contain user’s discussions.

      There are several websites that scrap the contents of 4chan and save it, but there

is no complete mirror archive of everything ever posted on the site, not even on the

provider’s servers. Therefore, only some of its contents are being preserved by

enthusiasts and volunteer internet historians. One example of such activity would be

the efforts of a group named Bibliotheca Anonoma, who gather and publicly offer their

30
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

findings on their website or “semantic wiki” (Bibliotheca Anonoma, n.d.), or the

LURKMORE Wiki, which considers itself to be “the encyclopedia of Anonymous”

(LURKMORE Wiki, n.d.).

4.4     User moderation, janitors

While seemingly chaotic, 4chan has its own set of rules and standards. These are

enforced either by so called janitors, an alternative to censors or moderators who keep

the forums in order by making sure the users adhere to those rules, or the users

themselves, who shun or outright attack those who refuse to follow them or are not

aware of such rules at all. The rules are different for each board, but it is universally

acknowledged that the users are forbidden from posting illegal content. Pornographic

content is tolerated, however only on certain designated boards.

      The distinction is based on the colour of the board itself, an attribute coded

directly into the website. By default, the so-called safe for work or sfw boards are blue,

and may not contain anything that would be deemed overly offensive of unacceptable.

Equally, red or nswf / not safe for work boards may contain all the other things that

would not be tolerated on blue boards, as long as it is not “anything that violates local

or United States law” (Rules - 4chan, 2021). The range of topics discussed is incredibly

broad and does include extreme, violent, racist and generally provocative matters. The

moderators, who are not financially compensated for their work, manually browse

through the forums and delete posts that do not adhere to the rules.

                                                                                       31
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

      Their motivation is generally unknown, as they are also anonymous and there is

no way to contact them. Arguably, they are driven only by the gratification stemming

from doing a service for their community.

4.5     User identity, post IDs

As referenced in the general introduction of the thesis, every post is assigned a post ID,

a combination of numbers based on multiple factors, with the crucial one being its

position in the moment when the reply or post is submitted. Starting from number 1,

post digits are increasing incrementally with each new post. For example, around the

time of writing this thesis, the /b/ board was reaching post number nearing

830000000.

      This is one of the mechanisms that introduce order into the seemingly

disorganised nature of the forum. However, the numbers play a major role in 4chan’s

CMD, having the power to turn a completely meaningless post into a treasured source

of 4chan’s own folklore. For the purposes of this thesis, I propose to name them

discourse-altering numerals.

4.6     Discourse-altering numerals

The actual content of a post is oftentimes not the most important part. Depending on

luck, timing or technical knowledge, an otherwise ordinary post may be considered

unquestionably true or outright prophetic just by being assigned an unusual post

number, or post ID, which would be the actual technical term for it.

32
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

                            Figure 1 - Post 222222222 (Ano-
                                     nymous, 2019)

As an example, in Figure 1, the post number 222222222 on the /pol/(politics) board is

being reacted to, confirmed or simply acknowledged by many other users not only for

its—arguably questionable—comic value, but mainly for its unique post number that

consists of 9 2s in a row. This is an event on its own, and the users of 4chan would

always react to these discourse-altering numerals and increase the frequency of their

posting when the discussion is nearing another milestone number.

    This behaviour could be linked to the attention reward theory proposed by Davis

and Graham, who argue that most mainstream social media platforms utilise a form of

binary rating system, claiming that it acts as an “indicator of value” (Davis & Graham,

2021). This is also true for 4chan, even though the binary value is assigned by the

                                                                                    33
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

programming algorithm of the website, not the users themselves. The only way for OP

to acknowledge the user feedback is to observe the direct textual reactions to their

post, with the website notifying the user when someone replies to their post by

attaching a (You) to each direct reply.

     Thanks to users’ fascination with discourse-altering numerals, an actual

terminology was established to complement them. Starting from doubles or dubs,

which would signify a post number ending in two identical numbers, they span all the

way to nons, a sequence of nine identical numbers in a row. The odds that a user

receives such a combination are exponentially smaller, and on busier boards, such as

/pol/ or /b/ it is almost impossible to obtain any combination without a great deal of

effort or just sheer luck.

                        Figure 2„GET Post 88869” (Anonymous, 2010)

34
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

4.6.1      GETs

      Some users only post for the sake of obtaining a post with a desirable number

combination. The act of doing so is called a GET. It usually takes the form of posting a

relevant picture, any kind of text string containing the words GET or simply GET on its

own, as seen in Figure 2, which can serve as a way to explain its mechanics. Sometimes,

the users refer to this act as roll.

      Posts with such high number combinations are sometimes archived, and always

considered important. The GETs once again reference to the “function as both value

markers and mechanisms of curation within a competitive attention economy”. (Davis

& Graham, 2021) Their message, if it contains any information at all, is—based on the

rarity of the post ID—considered increasingly more truthful and important.

4.7     Dubs, trips and other discourse-altering numerals

Since the number of rare posts containing more than 5 numbers in a row is quite low,

as described by Table 2, people are more likely to focus on more realistic goals, such as

obtaining simple dubs.

                                                                                      35
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

          Sequence Number of Digits Pattern                         Chance

          Quints       5                     XXXXXXXAAAAA           1 in 10,000

          Sexts        6                     XXXXXXAAAAAA           1 in 100,000

          Septs        7                     XXXXXAAAAAAA           1 in 1,000,000

          Octs         8                     XXXXAAAAAAAA 1 in 10,000,000

          Nons         9                     XXXAAAAAAAAA 1 in 100,000,000

           Table 2 - chances of obtaining a rare post ID (The Digit Advisory Page, n.d)

4.8     Check’em, Mr. Bateman

The link between the expression check’em and the GET mechanism has been

spontaneously established by the users who started following a certain practice. In

order to get dubs or a higher number string – in this case a form of validation of one’s

post or a reply – the user combines a GET post, an utterance to draw users’ attention

to the post ID, such as check’em, and a customarily a depiction of Christian Bale, who

played the protagonist of Mary Harron’s 2000 film American Psycho, based on the

eponymous novel written by Bret Easton Ellis, and who became an internet meme.

      The choice of Patrick Bateman, a highly controversial literary and movie character

conveys numerous implications relevant for the purposes of this thesis. A study

conducted by Christopher Burlingame sums up Bateman as a collection of “the worst

aspects of the male id”. Considering the fact that 4chan was and still is a place full of

pornographic and extremely offensive content, its demographics are predominantly

36
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

male and is also characteristic for its animosity towards women as well as the fact that

online anonymity facilitates sharing radical views (Neo et al., 2016), they could identify

with Bateman on many levels. Burlingame claims that “for both the fictional Bateman

and real-world men (…) the influence of pornography appears to shape their attitudes,

language, and behaviour in terms of how they conceptualize and treat women”. The

fans of Bateman are also willingly ignoring this fact, considering the movie a cult

classic, even though the “critics condemned the portrayal of sexual violence as

pornographic for the way it reduced women to objects and suggested Ellis's novel

normalized patriarchal oppression of women in the way it represented rape and

murder” (Burlingame, 2019).

    Just like the controversial contents of 4chan, “Bateman's actions extend to the

most extreme bounds of human behaviour, foregoing all decency; however, at the end

of the novel, it is not perfectly clear how much is real versus how much is a product of

Bateman's fantasies” (Burlingame, 2019). This interpretation implies that Bateman

fulfilled his true desires in his mind only. Same prediction could apply to 4chan’s users,

who would most likely not display their misogyny and racism outside of 4chan, since

it is a controversial topic that could potentially damage their public face, and similarly

to Bateman, they vent by anonymously posting on 4chan, with minimal consequences.

In other words, “the online self becomes a compartmentalized self. In the case of

expressed hostilities or other deviant actions, the person can avert responsibility for

those behaviors” (Suler, 2004). This explains why the picture of Patrick Bateman

pointing at the sound system, explaining the nuances of the latest Huey Lewis and the

                                                                                       37
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

News album to one of his victims seconds before slaughtering him with a fire axe—as

seen in Figure 3—is such an apt fit for this specific 4chan’s posting mechanism.

                   Figure 3„Check’em, post 193798577” (Anonymous, 2010)

4.9    Links to the incel movement

The major characteristics of Patrick Bateman are almost identical as those of a

prototypical incel, a shortened term signifying an involuntary celibate person, coined

“in the late 1990s by a Canadian woman named Alana” (Zimmer, 2018). One

characteristic trait of every incel would be their deeply ingrained animosity towards

women. They tend to blame women for their problems in life, while completely

overlooking their own repulsive and sexist behaviour and other flaws, ranging from

social ineptitude to narcissism and racism.

38
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

    Regarding their online presence, “incel discussion threads often focus on the belief

that men are entitled to sex and disparage ideologies related to women's rights and

feminism” (Caffrey, 2020).

4chan became a meeting point for some of the members of this group, especially after

other, more prominent websites such as Reddit banned their discussions completely

“due to the extremity of incel messages” (Dynel, 2020). Part of the reason why they

resort to using 4chan as their medium of choice is the fact that there are checks and

mechanisms in place that do not outright filter out female visitors, but rather level the

imaginary playing field.

    As stated, on 4chan, everyone is anonymous unless they choose to identify

themselves. They are simply anons (a short version for Anonymous, the default

username that is pre-entered when submitting a new post), one homogenous group

with no conception of sex, nationality or ethnicity. Unless they reveal themselves to be

different, either voluntarily or by accident, they will be regarded as every other user,

with no inherent prejudice. That, however, does not mean that the interlocutors

respect each other, or that the quality of discourse is high, but that all these social

factors and variables that heavily influence real-life communication are simply non-

existent on 4chan.

    This status quo is enforced by certain identity checks that serve as a filter,

discouraging the users from attempting to differentiate themselves. The most

prevalent one would be the tits or GTFO rule.

                                                                                      39
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

4.10 Tits or GTFO and 4chan’s misogyny

Every time a female user enters 4chan, or any similar male-dominated “confederacy of

interest groups, broadly known as the manosphere” (Ging, 2019) and attempts to

participate, it is only a matter of time before they will be met with negative feedback.

In the case of 4chan, this negative feedback takes a form of an identity check. Users

regard it as tits or GTFO rule. This check is utilised anytime a female poster enters the

discussion by either sharing their picture, replying in a manner that gives away their

sex or outright states it. Invariably, one of the responses will simply state “tits or GTFO

(get the fuck out)”. The user in question is now faced with an ultimatum. Either they

post their naked body and be allowed to speak, or they do not, and their posts will be

disregarded and saged.

     The male users require the female user to undergo a virtual form of sexual abuse.

In order to communicate, they must submit to those demands and accept their place

as something lesser, reducing themselves to a sexual object. The chances that an actual

woman goes through with such a bizarre and degrading request are slim, but if they

do, a strong reaction is always guaranteed. The thread then usually revolves around

the female, with people either praising their body and trying to gain their attention or

condemning her behaviour.

     Arguably, this is the reason why this check even exists, to eliminate these kinds of

unwanted disruption. A woman in a male-dominated virtual space of this kind is bound

to cause an uproar, and as noted by Filipovic, “these kinds of sexualized insults reflect

attempts to put women in their place, just as rape threats attempt to keep women

40
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

fearful in an effort to relegate them to the domestic sphere” (Filipovic, 2007).

Furthermore, Phillips points at the root of this problem, claiming that “aggressive

speech directed at women is sexist, but it’s symptomatic of something much deeper

and much older than the contemporary attitudes of contemporary men toward

contemporary women”, arguing that this behaviour is rooted in the very foundations

of the Western civilisation, stressing “the significance of classical era” (Phillips, 2015).

     To sum up this phenomenon within the context of 4chan, the tits or GTFO check

serves to eliminate any attempt to either change the status quo of 4chan being a male

space and to translate any of the real-world power structures into the virtual discourse

on the webpage. This way, the woman is usually discouraged to participate in the

discussion, or should she comply with the request, serves as a form of entertainment

for the male users. The last option is for her to not disclose her gender at all, therefore

adhering to the unwritten rules of 4chan and simply participating as any other

anonymous user, anon. The other option would be not to participate at all.

     This would confirm the claims made by Herring, who states that “when women's

attempts at equal participation are the cause of (male) dissatisfaction—even if voiced

publicly by only a few —and disruption of list functioning, a message is communicated

to the effect that it is more appropriate for women to participate less” (Herring, 1995).

The reasons behind the hostility displayed towards the users who do not respect or

adhere to those rules, causing disagreements and negative reactions, is also supported

by the claim presented by Weber, who argues that such “disputes can be an effective

way for online communities and their members to communicate their boundaries,

                                                                                         41
4CHAN’S CHARACTERISTIC PHENOMENA AND MECHANISMS

identities, and relationships”, which is something that the users of 4chan tend to do

constantly. (Weber, 2011).

4.11 Other forms of user identification

While most of the users of 4chan simply remain under the handle Anonymous, and refer

to each other utilising its abbreviation anon, there are still some are aware of the rules,

yet choose to differentiate themselves from the crowd. Choosing to do so will in most

cases result in a hostile reaction, even if they are not female.

       For these reasons, only a small fraction of users chooses to post on 4chan in a

manner that would make it possible for them to be identified, be it an online handle or

even their real name. Curiously, the tools are there – when posting, user may choose to

use a personal, randomly generated code, which will allow them to post under a unique

handle, while simultaneously preventing anyone else from using it. This is called a

tripcode.

4.12     Tripcodes and tripfags

       Tripcodes are a form of identification generally used by users who want to make

their presence permanent. This goes against the whole philosophy of 4chan, and as

such, they must face the unpleasant consequences of using them. As a vehicle to display

user’s hostility towards such user, a special derogatory term is reserved for those who

use a tripcode to identify themselves. They are known as tripfags.

42
MORPHOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE FORUM

5 Morphological and stylistic aspects of the forum

5.8     The curious case of the word fag

      Tripfag, this portmanteau of words tripcode and faggot is a term very important

to understand in order to gain an overall understanding of 4chan’s morphological

dynamics. The very term describing a 4chan user is, for reasons unknown, fag or

faggot. This word was originally borrowed from French, meaning “a bundle of sticks,

twigs, or brushwood tied together for use as fuel” (Oxford English Dictionary, 2020).

However, in the North American context, defined in the American Heritage Dictionary

of the English Language it signifies “a term used to refer to a male homosexual”. In the

context of 4chan’s discourse, it serves as a primary unit for further development of

other terminology. The origins of the idea that every member of the forum is a faggot

trace back to the very beginnings of 4chan and the term has been an integral part of its

lexicon ever since.

      From a linguistic point of view, fag serves as a specific form of morpheme.

Carrying a certain meaning on its own, in this case referring to member of 4chan, it can

at the same time be devoid of any deeper meaning unless combined with another

morpheme, which then serves as a stem word. It may even be used as a reflexive

pronoun, with users referring to themselves as poorfags, sharing their unsatisfying

financial status, or eurofags, indicating their nationality. There are many other

variations, as seen in Table 3.

                                                                                     43
MORPHOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE FORUM

                             Word                    Absolute Frequency

         1               newfag                      1800
         2               samefag                     482
         3               oldfag                      288
         4                poorfag                    260
         5               drawfag                     123
         6               9fag                        93
         7               furfag                      75
         8               richfag                     71
         9               amerifag                    61
         10              eurofag                     58
                  Table 3 – most frequent nouns containing the -fag suffix

     Depending on the context, the word fag usually does not carry any kind of negative

or positive connotation, as it does outside of 4chan. It is only meant as an offensive

word if the addresser wants it to be, and this can usually be deduced by the context or

the choice of collocation.

     This is a phenomenon frequently found in in-group word usage analyses, with

researchers claiming that “such in- group usage will incrementally “defang” words of

their negative connotations, ultimately reshaping the lexical content of the word itself”.

As a result of this process, it then becomes a form of humorous self-reference. It is

possible to observe it in “the in- group usage of terms such as nigger, chink, and fob

(“fresh-off-the-boat” Asian immigrants), which are sometimes used endearingly by

African Americans and Asian Americans, respectively” (H. Samy Alim et al., 2016). In

other words, when the members of an online ingroup “…use words like “addiction,”

“sex,” and “fuck,” the meanings of these will be in part determined by their context of

use; these meanings may not reflect the force of these words to individuals outside the

44
MORPHOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE FORUM

community” (LeBlanc, 2005). This would in turn explain the reason why users do not

view it as a derogatory term.

  op is a faggot op is a faggot op is a    faggot    op is a faggot op is a faggot op is a faggot

   Fuck off and kill yourself you ginger   faggot    .Thank you.

                Sure you did        faggot    Fuckin rekt enjoy diddling grandma nigga

 OP IS A SHITTY CUMSWALLOWING              FAGGOT    CUNT Calligula role gg go 518

          >go ew I can't believe you       faggots   couldn't get noods from this hoe

   THE FUCK OUT OF /b/ FUCKING             FAGGOT    GET THE FUCK OUT OF /b/

   !!! FAIL!!!!!LOL nice bait,      faggot    Ass ass ass Thats some sort of pocket

          from them. you neckbeard         faggots   bitch about them like a bunch of chicks

                 >.45acp is for dumb       faggots   she's my favorite amateur since Vicky

 NEDERDRAAD sletten editie zijn jullie     faggot    nog wakker?Sletteneditie

                       Table 4 – random concordance of the lemma faggot

    The word fag, when combined with a root word, is given a certain meaning,

effectively creating a neologism. The root word can be any relevant noun, or

combination of nouns. This results in a great number of possible permutations, with

new ones being coined every day, adapting to new contexts that emerge in 4chan’s

discourse. Looking at the corpus frequency analysis, “fag” is being utilised 23,488

times, taking the 5th place in the most-used nouns in the corpus. This random sample

                                                                                                45
MORPHOLOGICAL AND STYLISTIC ASPECTS OF THE FORUM

is also very representative, in that it shows some of the most commonly used

collocations, as seen in Table 5 below. Also note an interesting entry by a Dutch user,

who seems to use it as a loan word. The presence of other nationalities is clearly visible,

but no matter the language, they evidently still employ 4chan’s slang lexicon.

         Position           Word                    Cooccurrences

         1                soc                       1056
         2                fucking                   777
         3                fuck                      740
         4                get                       700
         5                the                       730
         6                op                        1050
         7                you                       5120
         8                a                         5410
         9                b                         569
         10               is                        824
                    Table 5 – most frequent collocations of lemma faggot

5.9     Newfags and oldfags

For the sake of brevity, out of the countless combinations created by the suffix -fag only

several most relevant occurrences shall be discussed in detail. A good example of these

word combinations in use would be the neologisms newfag and oldfag. These are also

antonyms, used to represent the two main types of users, and are based on their

seniority. Since there are no set or traceable cut-offs, such as the date of registration or

number of posts submitted in the forum, the newfags and oldfags tend to argue over

their rights to call themselves or others using one term one or another.

      Perhaps the only way to differentiate between these two groups is their attestable

knowledge of 4chan’s rules, lingo, and history. But even someone familiar with all of

46
You can also read