Conceptualisation of Metaphors in Bongo Flava Music

Page created by Doris Duncan
 
CONTINUE READING
ISSN 2277-0852; Volume 1, Issue 4, pp. 59-67; September 2012
           Online International Journal of Arts and Humanities
                                         ©2012 Online Research Journals
                                                    Full Length Research

                              Available Online at http://www.onlineresearchjournals.org/IJAH

    Conceptualisation of Metaphors in Bongo Flava
                        Music
                                                        Hadija Jilala
Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Open University of Tanzania, P.O. Box 23409, Dares Salaam, Tanzania.
                                     Email: dijaah@yahoo.com; Tel: 0712569555.

Downloaded 13 July, 2012                                                                           Accepted 18 September, 2012

    This paper was about the conceptualisation of metaphors in bongo flava music. It critically analyses the
    way metaphors are conceptualised and interpreted by audience. By employing cognitive theory of
    metaphor, the paper argue that metaphors are conceptualised and interpreted depending on time,
    people embodied experience, context of use and social cultural interaction. The paper also argues that,
    people of different age groups differ in conceptualising metaphor. That means that there is difference in
    conceptualisation of meaning between different age groups, peers, employees and employers, parents
    and children, lovers and friends. People use metaphor to communicate among groups in the society.

    Keywords: Metaphors, bongo fleva, conceptualisation, audience, cognitive theory.

INTRODUCTION

Sangharakshita as quoted by Jilala [1], explain that, Art is     word ubongo that means brain and intelligence. Literary it
the organisation of sense impression into pleasurable            means “Brain”. Bongo is a local slang word referring to
formal relations that expresses the artist’s sensibility and     the city of Dar es Salaam or to Tanzania. The idea is that
communicates to one’s audience a sense of value that             you need to have good “brains” to survive in Tanzania,
can transform their lives. Art refers to the developed and       Haas and Gesthuizen [2]. Bongo music is a creation of
efficient use of language to convey meaning with                 Tanzanian young generation by adopting American hip
immediacy and depth. Basically it includes aesthetics,           hop and rhythm to sing Kiswahili hip hop.
architecture, crafts, drama, fine arts, literature, music and       Bongo Flava music includes different styles such as
primitive arts. A work of art, therefore, is something that      Hip hop, Rap, RandB and Zuku. Hip hop music originated
employs skills and imagination in the creation of aesthetic      in America. It was a voice of the marginalized youth from
objects, environment or experience to share with others.         poorer areas (Senkoro [3], Perullo [4], Southern [5].
A work of art embodies the artist’s understanding of the         Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine how
world as it reveals different meanings depending on one’s        listeners interpret metaphors. Specifically it aims to find
perspective in a specific context, time and space.               out if there are differences in the process of
   Basically, language has various stylistic devices which       conceptualisation of metaphors among different age
are employed by artists in works of art. These devices           groups. Furthermore, it tries to find out if the
include     metaphor,      metonym,        allegory,   simile,   conceptualisation of metaphor among different age
synecdoche, irony, personification, hyperbole, parallelism       groups is influenced by the type of metaphor. Therefore,
and parenthesis. This paper deals with metaphors as              this study was set out to find the answers to the following
language devices which artists employ in their works of          questions:
art. Metaphors are some of the linguistic devices used in
people’s everyday language to convey meanings and                i) How do listeners conceptualise metaphors in new
messages to the respective audience.                             generation songs?
   This paper deals with Tanzania’s bongo flava music            ii) Is there any difference among listeners of different age
popularly known as Bongo Flava. Bongo Flava originates           groups in conceptualising metaphors?
from a word Bongo in Kiswahili which comes from the              iii) Does the type of metaphor in question influence the
60          Online Int. J. Arts Human.

degree of conceptualisation among different age groups?        Perullo, Rap music is used as a medium to express
                                                               various issues in society. His paper did not show how
Review of Related Literature                                   those issues are conveyed through the artistic use of
                                                               language. This paper has been able to explore how
Some scholars have written about bongo flava music in          metaphors are used to articulate those issues.
different social settings in Tanzania. They include              Omari [10] looks at style and language use in new
Majembe [6], Fenn and Perullo [7], Perullo and Fenn [8],       generation hip hop music, in Tanzania. She explored the
Senkoro [3], Perullo [9] and Omar [10]. Majembe [6] and        uses of figures of speech such as similes, metaphors,
Fenn and Perullo [7] deals with language use in Hip hop        satire, image, repetition, taboos and other language
music. Both paid attention to the socio-linguistic aspect of   features such as the uses of children’s songs, code
code mixing in these songs. Majembe argues that                mixing, onomatopoeia, intonation and borrowing.
language mixture is a feature which frequently appears in      However, her paper did not analyse in detail stylistic
these songs. His paper goes on to point out that               features and artistic functions of those figures of speech
language mixing is a foregrounding feature in bongo flava      as they appear in works of art. This paper therefore,
music. Fenn and Perullo present ideas that extend              makes a critical analysis of metaphor as a stylistic device
Majembe’s arguments by saying that language mixture in         by analyzing the types and structure of those metaphors.
Hip hop is due to a certain ideology built among these         Also it explores the artistic use of metaphor in creating
artists for the purpose of getting many followers. They        meanings and messages to which Omari did not pay
use English because it is viewed as an international           attention.
language and they use Kiswahili because it is the
language which is known by the majority of Tanzanians.         The Concept of Metaphor
Both Majembe and Fenn and Perullo analyse the
language choice in the bongo flava music. They have not        Most scholars agree that metaphorical use of language
gone beyond content analysis to include stylistic analysis     essentially involves seeing something in one domain in
of these songs. However, they did not deal with the            terms of something in a second domain. It is the
interpretation of metaphors. The question of language          transference of meaning from one reference to the other
choice is also the subject matter of such writers as           reference (see for example, Black [11,12], Leech [13],
Perullo and Fenn [8] who look at language ideologies,          Lakoff and Johnson [14], Lakoff [15, 16], Lakoff and
choice and practices in Eastern African Hip Hop. They          Turne [17], Kahigi [18], and Gibbs [19, 20, 21, and 22]. In
too argue that the process of language choice among            this paper therefore, we conceptualise metaphor in
rappers is a function of language ideologies. In their         relation to our cognitive understanding of metaphor as
discussion they do not deal with the way audience              “that figure of speech whereby we speak about one thing
interpret metaphors.                                           in terms which are seen to be suggestive of another.”
   In his article, Senkoro [3] acknowledges the language       Therefore, we use metaphor in our everyday life to
mixture in bongo fleva songs. He however goes one step         convey reality and abstract things. Lakoff and Johnson
further to comment on the content of the song by saying        [14] argue that metaphors are pervasive in everyday life
that artists use rap music as a medium to express their        not just in language but in thought and action and they
hope, problems, emotion, and expectations. Looking at it       form a regular semantic feature in people’s thought. They
from a socio-economic view point, he explains that artists     further argue that our ordinary conceptual system, in
use language as a commodity which they use for self-           terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally
employment. He also argues that, although these songs          metaphorical in nature. Metaphor has become the thing
have a mixture of Kiswahili, English and local languages,      to be expected in cognition instead of a thing to be
the predominant language used is Kiswahili because it is       avoided in language Steen, [23].
the language which is popular to the majority. Like               To stress the pervasiveness of metaphors, Lakoff and
Majembe and Fenn and Perullo, Senkoro’s paper does             Johnson [14:30] say that if we are right in suggesting that
not discuss how metaphors are interpreted by different         our conceptual system is largely metaphorical, then the
listeners.                                                     way we think, what we experience, and what we do every
   The question of content is also the concern of Perullo      day is very much a metaphor. By this statement, these
[4] in his work: “Hooligans and heroes: Youth Identity and     cognitive linguists acknowledge that metaphor is a major
Hip-Hop in Dar es Salaam.” He argues that the youth use        device of human conceptualization and, although largely
rap music to deal with social pressures and project            unnoticed, the processes are pervasively and
themselves as creative and empowered individuals in the        systematically at work in everyday language.
society. Rap music, he says, is a central means for
youths to teach others about joblessness, corruption,          Structure of Metaphor
class differences, AIDS and other social problems. It
empowers youths by providing them with confidence and          Meaning transference from one domain to another
self-reliance, not anger and violence. According to            basically involves three notional elements of metaphor
Jilala         61

which are tenor, vehicle and ground (Hester [24], Leech        supported by the Cognitive Theory which holds that
[25], Hedley [26], Kahigi [18]. The corresponding terms to     literary texts are the products of the cognising minds and
“tenor” and “vehicle” in Lakoff’s terminology are “target”     their interpretations is the product of other cognising
and “source.” The tenor of the metaphor is the literal part    minds in the context of the physical and socio-cultural
of expression which is reconstructed in the literal context.   worlds in which they have been created and are read.
The vehicle which is the figurative part of the expression        From the cognitive point of view both text and reader
together with its reconstructed context is the image or        are of equal importance, though they are not equal.
analogue in terms of which the tenor is presented.             There is no meaning without interpretation and no
Ground is the likeness perceived between tenor and             interpretation without the individual memory, and the
vehicle. Therefore, every metaphor is in the form of “X is     mnemonic space is the only site where meaning can
like Y in respect of Z where X is the tenor, Y the vehicle     occur. Furthermore, the theory holds that the reader’s
and Z the ground”. Therefore, in the example “Hamisa is        interpretation is a function of his or her mnemonic
gold”, the tenor is Hamisa, the vehicle is gold and the        potentials, which include inter-textual knowledge of
ground is the characteristics of gold (expensive, attractive   literary conventions and above all, knowledge of
and highly valued) which are attributed to Hamisa.             language and the world [28].
   The tenor, vehicle, and ground of metaphor are                 Furthermore, Gibbs [21] argues that it is difficult to
considered as the important elements in the                    explain the richness of these metaphorical inferences
understanding of metaphors, in the interpretation of their     without appealing to people’s embodied experiences. To
meaning and the theme they construct in a specific             stress on this, Lakoff and Turner [17] argue that the basic
context. Therefore, these characteristics which are            conceptual metaphors are part of the conceptual
perceived to be shared by items of different semantic          apparatus shared by members of a culture. In addition,
fields enable the hearer or reader to find the probable        Lakoff and Johnson [14] put forward the idea that
meaning by making a plausible comparison.                      individuals are coupled to the world through embodied
                                                               interaction with the environment on which their sense of
                                                               what is real is based. Following the insights from the
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY                                           findings and literature review, the paper makes a model
                                                               which summarises the interpretation process. The
The research was done in Dar es Salaam whereby ten             findings on listeners’ conceptualisation of metaphors can
artists and twenty audiences were involved as research         be illustrated by the Figure 1.
respondents. The audiences comprise ten elders and ten            Figure 1 show how the interpretation process of
youths. Hence, ten songs were used in collecting               metaphor is reached. This process involves four
metaphors. To meet the objectives, the study employed          elements which are society, artist (encoder), metaphor
interview technique on both artists and listeners of these     and listener (decoder). Both encoder and decoder are
songs to get their views and opinions on the uses and          members of the society, thus they are bound by certain
understanding of metaphors to convey meanings and              norms prevailing in the society. Therefore, during
messages. Moreover, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)             metaphor construction, the encoder relies on the society
were held with listeners to explore their understanding of     as the basis for making the metaphor; that is, he/she
meanings and messages conveyed by metaphors in the             makes the metaphor reflecting the context of that
society. By employing focus group discussion a group of        particular society. The same process applies to the
six people were formed to form a discussion group. The         decoder during metaphor interpretation; the decoder
method was useful since it produces a lot of information       understands the metaphor because of the shared
quickly and is good for identifying and exploring beliefs,     member resource (shared knowledge) between him/her
ideas or opinion in a community.                               and the encoder of the metaphor. It is for this reason that
                                                               it is hard for a member of one society to decode the
                                                               metaphor constructed by a member of another society.
FINDINGS                                                          However, there is indirect relationship in meaning and
                                                               message between artist and listener. Their relationship is
Listener Conceptualisation of Metaphors                        based on the fact that they are all members of the same
                                                               community and thus they have socially shared knowledge
One of the specific objectives of this study was to            that aids communication between them. The following are
examine how listeners conceptualise metaphors. Thus,           the member resources (shared knowledge) which the
the researcher interviewed her respondents on how they         paper found to be guiding metaphor interpretation.
conceptualise the metaphors. The research observes
that, people do get meanings from society. As suggested        • The context
by different scholars (Lakoff and Johnson [16], Gibbs          • People embodied experience
[21], Johnson [27], and Lakoff and Turner [17], society as     • Time and the events happening in the society
the source of conceptualising metaphors is also                • Cultural interaction
62          Online Int. J. Arts Human.

            Metaphor construction             SOCIETY                 Metaphor interpretation
                                 Context
                                 Time
                                 Culture
                                 Experience
                                 Social interaction
            Reference            Shared knowledge (member
            Object                resource)                                   Reference
                   Object

            ENCODING                                                        DECODING
                                                Metaphor
                                       Indirect relationship
              ARTIST                                                                       LISTENER
                                         Message/Meanings

            Source: Worked out

          Figure 1. Model of Interpretation Process
          Source: Worked out from data analysis

• Social interaction                                           the society in question. One interviewer had this to say
                                                               on the use of metaphors “Maneno tunayatoa ndani ya
Context of Use                                                 jamii yetu maana zake zinajulikana kulingana na mila na
                                                               desturi zetu” (we select words used in our society, their
The analysis reveals that there is a relationship between      meanings are known in accordance with our cultural
context and the listener’s understanding and                   customs). This means, for example, that the meaning of
interpretation of metaphors. That is, the metaphor is          metaphors such as ngoma (a drum), miwaya (electrical
understood in the context of use and the artist selects a      wires), changu (sea fish) and dege la jeshi (military
metaphorical expression within the cultural context.           aircraft) exist in the society and within people’s mental
Metaphorical meaning of an expression is understood in         cognition. Consequently, they are easy to interpret.
the context of use whereby an expression can have              Therefore, the choice of an expression is done within the
different meanings depending on the context of use. The        society given time and space; that is why a large
choice of a metaphor also depends on the context and           percentage of respondents who were interviewed
the message to be portrayed. For example, the                  appeared to have the knowledge of metaphorical
expression ngoma (drum) refers to a woman or HIV but           meanings because they share similar embodied
could mean a strong person in a different context.             experience of the society. This explains the reason why
                                                               the new metaphorical expressions cannot be easily
People’s Embodied Experience                                   interpreted by old listeners. Most metaphors are drawn
                                                               from the language of youth therefore; the adults fail to
The analysis reveals that people interpret metaphors           map the metaphor unto what is stored in their memory.
from their body of experiences within their cultural context   That is, the word does not relate to the world material in
and social cognition. The interpretation is done between       adult’s physical world. Furthermore, the interpretation of
what already exists in their mind and how they interact        metaphors involves the transfer of the relation between
within their society. This means that younger generation’s     the semantic field of the vehicle and that of the tenor. The
experience is different from that of the older generation;     listener has primary knowledge and experience on the
as the old generation may not be aware of all that is          literal expression.
happening in the world of the new generation. That is
why the old generation sometimes fail to understand            Time
some metaphorical meanings used by the youth.
   However, despite the difference, the artistic use of        The paper observed that metaphors are developed and
metaphorical language does not go beyond the culture of        interpreted within a given time. The data shows that
Jilala         63

youths were better able to interpret contemporary              its use as a metaphor for HIV/AIDS.
metaphors compared to elders. Interpretation of                   In the same context, the metaphor mtoto (baby) is used
metaphors goes with time/age. Old people can easily            for a girl. Society has the understanding that a baby is a
interpret metaphors that existed during their times as         delicate being that needs care in handling; the baby is
opposed to youths. For example, it was easy for them to        also dependent. The characteristics of the baby are
interpret metaphor such as taa, nguzo, malaika, uaridi         transferred to a girl or woman. The listeners thus view a
and malkia because these are common metaphors. On              girl through their understanding of a baby; thus, women
the other hand, the youth can interpret contemporary           are delicate beings who need care in handling; they are
metaphors better than the old because the former use           thought to be dependants who cannot stand alone
them frequently. However, metaphors related to diseases        without the support of men. Therefore, from these
and other burning issues are easily used and interpreted       examples the paper concludes that metaphors are
better by both the youth and the old, because these are        culturally constructed and understood in a particular
issues which surround both groups.                             society.
  Furthermore, the paper found that there are words,
phrases, clauses or sentences, which become metaphors          Differences in Meaning Interpretation
as time goes by, due to changes of the physical
environment. For example, disease metaphors such as            The researcher did a comparative analysis to find out if
umeme (electricity), miwaya (electrical wires) and ngoma       there is any significant difference in conceptualising
(drum) are metaphors for HIV, and they have been               metaphors among different age groups. The following
determined by time. They have become metaphors due             question guided the analysis: Is there any difference or
to the HIV problem in the society, currently. Generally,       similarity in conceptualising metaphor among the two age
the paper observes that time/age greatly determine             groups?
metaphor interpretation.                                          The researcher measured the rate of conceptualising
                                                               metaphors by employing a structured interview whereby
Cultural Interaction                                           respondents were provided with a list of collected
                                                               metaphors selected from 10 bongo flava music. Then
Cultural influence also plays a great role in interpreting     every respondent was required to give either literal
metaphors. The interpretation of many metaphors were           meaning or metaphorical meaning of each metaphor in
said to be determined by culture. For example, it was          the list. The researcher analysed the responses to the
said that the expensive value of dhahabu (gold) is             questionnaire which were given to listeners of different
culturally constructed within the society, because of the      age groups, by calculating the frequency in similarity of
uses that gold can be put into. This makes it easy for a       meaning of metaphors given by each member of the
listener to interpret a metaphor dhahabu (gold) as an          group. Table 1 summarises the findings.
expensive and highly valued commodity. This is because            Table 1 shows that people aged 15-35 (the youth) were
its characteristics, e.g. glittering and attractive look are   able to interpret metaphorical meanings 1,942 (86%)
known to all members of the society.                           compared to people aged 36-55 (adults) who scored
  Another example of metaphors whose interpretation is         1,042 (46%). This implies that the youth have better
culturally determined is Ngoma (drum), as a metaphor for       knowledge of metaphors employed by the new
a woman. In its literal meaning ngoma is an instrument         generation artists in their works of art than adults. The
associated with entertainment. Culturally, women are           reason for such difference in meaning interpretation is
sometimes perceived as key instruments for entertaining        that these songs draw the language of youth so the
men; thus, the choice of ngoma as a metaphor for               conceptualisation of meanings is easier to the youths as
woman is done through the characteristics and uses of          compared to adults. Consequently, youths have more
ngoma within a particular society. “Ngoma hutumika             interest in these songs compared to adults who seem to
kuburudisha, hii ni kazi ya mwanamke kuburudisha               have a negative attitude towards these songs.
mwanamume ndiyo maana mwanamke anafananishwa                      The age group 15-35 has higher level of grasping the
na ngoma kulingana na wajibu wake kwa jamii” (the drum         meanings of metaphorical expressions; the reason for
is used for entertainment, the role of women in the            this may be because this group highly wants to be
society is to entertain men, that is why a woman is            recognised. They use these songs as a medium of
compared to a drum). This was reported by a participant        expressing their needs such as love, sexuality,
in FGDs. Furthermore, ngoma is used for communication          employment and economic needs. This observation is not
and calling the attention of people just like a bell or        different from the observation of other scholars such as
whistle would be used. It is also used as a metaphor for       Senkoro [3] and Perullo [4], who also found out that
HIV/AIDS since the major transmission of the disease is        youths use this song to express their problems, needs,
sexual intercourse, which is regarded as a luxury and          feelings and expectations—socially, economically and
entertainment. Therefore, the cultural function of ngoma       politically. The metaphors used by youths are different
is associated with the transmission of the disease, hence      from the metaphors used by the older generation due to
64          Online Int. J. Arts Human.

                         Table 1. Rate of Metaphor Conceptualising Among Different Ages Groups

                              Age group                  Frequency                      Frequency in      %
                                                      A      B      C                  A      B           C
                                 15-35               267    1942    41                 12    86           2
                                 36-60               998    1042   210                 44    46           9
                          Source: Researcher’s interpretation of data.
                          Key: A= Literal meaning B= Metaphorical meaning C= I don’t know

                                                          Among the Two Age Groups

                                          46%

                                                                                                86%

                                                                                            Youth     Adult

                               Figure 3.2.
                               Figure    The Difference
                                           The          in Conceptualisation
                                                Difference                   Metaphors.
                                                            in Conceptualisation   Metaphors.

time and events, context and experiences in the material                   are other metaphors which were well interpreted by both
world. On the other hand, adults aged 35-55 have a low                     groups and others were only understood by one group.
capacity of grasping meaning of metaphors compared to                      Table 2 shows the different levels of metaphors
the youth. The group is at the age in which love and                       conceptualization in score for each metaphor depending
sexuality are not their urgent needs; therefore they are                   on the familiarity of that particular metaphor.
not interested in bongo flava music because the message                      Table 2 indicates that there is significance of similarity
in these songs is not their immediate interest. Hence the                  in scores between the two age groups. Both groups score
paper has generalised that the age factor determines the                   the highest (34-50) in meaning interpretation. This
familiarity of metaphorical meaning. The paper shows a                     reveals that those metaphors are familiar to both groups.
significant    difference   in   metaphorical    meaning                   The paper considers these metaphors as popular
interpretation between youths and adults. This can be                      metaphors; they are well known to the majority in the
explicitly explained by Figure 2. Figure 2 shows that the                  society. They appear to be associated with events and
youth have more knowledge and understanding of                             burning issues which call for the attention of the people in
meaning and messages addressed by bongo flava music                        the society. For example, disease metaphors such as
compared to adults. However, the research has also                         miwaya, umeme, ngoma and moto, which are metaphors
revealed that, the understanding of meaning differs from                   for HIV/AIDS disease; romantic metaphors (metaphor
one age group to another.                                                  associated with love, sexual organs and sexual
                                                                           intercourse) such as machangu, a metaphor referring to
Types   of    Metaphor  and the  Degree   of                               female prostitutes. Such metaphors are created in the
Conceptualizing Metaphor among Different Age                               society and exist for a long period, so everybody knows
Groups                                                                     their meaning.
                                                                             In addition, there are metaphors which are also well
The analysis reveals that the interpretations of metaphorical              known by both groups so that it was easy for people who
meanings in bongo flava music are also determined by the                   were interviewed to interpret their meanings. With this
familiarity of metaphor in the society. The understanding                  type, there was no significant difference in conceptualising
of metaphor differs from one metaphor to another. There                    these metaphors between the two groups. The paper
Jilala         65

              Table 2. Metaphor According to Events and Burning Issues in the Society

                Metaphors                   Age group 15-35                            Age group 36-55
                                       34-50       17-33      1-16              34-50     17-33    1-16 (lowest
                                     (highest      (mild    (lowest           (highest    (mild       score)
                                      score)      score)     score)            score)    score)
               Miwaya                    √                                        √
               Umeme                     √                                        √
               Ngoma                     √                                        √
               Moto                      √                                        √
               Machangu                  √                                        √
              Source: Field Data. (Fieldwork 20 January 2007).

                 Table 3. Common Metaphors.

                   Metaphor                     Age group 15-35                          Age group 36-55
                                     34-50 (highest    17-33      1-16               34-50    17-33      1-16
                                         score)         (mild   (lowest            (highest    (mild   (lowest
                                                       score)    score)             score)    score)    score)
                  Uaridi                    √                                          √
                  Jua kali                  √                                                    √
                  Miba                      √                                          √
                  Malaika                   √                                          √
                  Kioo                      √                                          √
                  Kandanda                  √                                          √
                  Nguzo                     √                                          √
                  Malkia                    √                                          √
                 Source: Field Data (field work 20 January 2007).

       Table 4. Contemporary Metaphors.

              Metaphors                              Age group 15-35                          Age group 36-55
                                           34-50            17-33          1-16          34-50     17-33       1-16
                                         (highest           (mild        (lowest       (highest     (mild    (lowest
                                          score)           score)         score)        score)     score)     score)
        Dege la jeshi                        √                                                                   √
        Kombati                              √                                                                   √
        Kicheche                             √                                                                   √
        Pipi                                 √                                                                   √
        Kopo lenye marashi                   √                                                                   √
        Geti                                 √                                                                   √
       Source: Field Data (field work 20 January 2007).

considers these metaphors as common metaphors                          Thus, both groups scored highest in interpreting these
because they are well established, as they have existed                metaphors. This might be because these metaphors are
in the society for a long time. That is why they are well              common and well established in the society and they are
known to both groups. Table 3 shows such metaphors                     used as daily language. Furthermore, there are
and their level of conceptualisation.                                  metaphors which are only known by youths. Table 4
Table 3 shows that the difference in metaphorical                      shows those metaphors and the score for each group.
understanding between the two groups is very small.                      Table 4 reveals a significant difference in interpretation
66            Online Int. J. Arts Human.

of metaphors between the two groups. The youth scored                   [4] Perullo A. Hooligans and Heroes: Youth Identify and Hip Hop in Dar
                                                                        es Salaam Tanzania, Afri. Today, 2005; 51(4): 74-101.
the highest (34-50) while the adults scored the lowest (1-
17). The reason for this difference is that these                       [5] Southern E. The Music of Black Americans: A History, New York, W.
metaphors such as dege la jeshi, kicheche, kombati,                     W. Norton and Company. 1983.
watoto wa geti and kopo lenye marashi have been
                                                                        [6] Majembe AK. Language Choice and Hip Hop in Tanzania, in Popular
created by youths. From this observation, the paper
                                                                        Music and Society, Bowling green.1998.
considers these metaphors as contemporary because
they are new in the society, and the old have nothing to                [7] Fenn J, Perullo A. Language Choice and Hip hop in Tanzania, in
do with those words since they don’t fall within their                  Popular Music and Society, University of Bowling Green City. 2000.
repertoire. The adults appear to have negative attitude                 [8] Perullo A, Fenn J. Language Ideologies, Choice and Practices in
towards the language used by youths which they                          Eastern African Hip Hop, in Berger HM, Thomas M. (Eds). Global
consider to be hooliganism.                                             Popular Music: The Politics and Aesthetics of Language Choice,
                                                                        Mississippi, University Press of Mississippi. 2003.

                                                                        [9] Perullo A. “The Life That Live”: Popular, Urban Practices and Agency
CONCLUSION                                                              in Dares Salaam, Tanzania, Ph.D. Dissertation, Indian University. 2003.

The analysis has revealed that listeners’ interpretations of            [10] Omari S. “Mitindo na Matumizi ya Lugha katika Muziki wa Kizazi
                                                                        kipya”, in Jarida la Taasisi ya Uchunguzi wa Kiswahili, Chuo Kikuu cha
metaphors is influenced by the context of use, people’s
                                                                        Dares Salaam. 2006; 69: 73-92.
embodied experience, time and events and cultural
interaction. It also shows that the difference in                       [11] Black M. Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and
interpretation of metaphors is influenced by age,                       Philosophy, New York, Cornell University Press. 1962.
commonality of metaphor, popularity of metaphor, time                   [12] Black M. More about Metaphor in Metaphor Thought, Cambridge,
and events. The analysis shows that metaphors are                       Cambridge University. 1979.
mostly used to develop themes and various social,
cultural and economic issues.                                           [13] Leech GN. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry, London, Longman
                                                                        Group Ltd. 1969.
  The paper has investigated how listeners interpret
metaphors used in bongo flava music. It has been found                  [14] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphor We Live By, Chicago, University of
out that understanding metaphors differs depends on the                 Chicago Press. 1980.
age of the listener and the familiarity of the metaphors to
                                                                        [15] Lakoff G. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor, In Orton, A. (Ed)
such listeners. That is why, as established in the paper,
                                                                        Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1993;
youths have more knowledge and understanding of                         pp 202-251.
meanings of metaphors in bongo flava music than adults.
The main focus in this paper has been the stylistic                     [16] Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories
                                                                        Reveal About the Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 1987.
features of metaphors, social-cultural context and
embodied knowledge and experience of the physical                       [17] Lakoff G, Turner M. More Than Cool Reasons: A Field Guide to
world. Furthermore, the paper has shown that there are                  Poetic Metaphor, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 1989.
metaphors which appear to be well known to both age
                                                                        [18] Kahigi KK. Lugha Katika Vitabu Vya Watoto. In Kahigi K. K. (Ed)
groups; these include common and popular metaphors.                     Kioo cha Lugha: Jarida la Kiswahili, Isimu na Fasihi, Idara ya Kiswahili,
  There are other metaphors which are known by the                      Chuo Kikuu cha Dar es Salaam. 1995; 1: pp 21-36.
youth only, including contemporary metaphors. The
paper also presents the model of interpretation which                   [19] Gibbs RW. Taking Metaphor Out of Our Heads and Putting it into
                                                                        the Cultural World, In Gibbs R, Steen G. Metaphor in Cognitive
shows how metaphors are interpreted. By using the
                                                                        Linguistics, Philadelphia, John Benjamins. 1999; pp 145-166.
model which is used in the interpretation process, the
paper shows that the comprehension of metaphors has                     [20] Gibbs RW. Cognitive Science Meets Metaphor and Metaphysics.
relationships with the context of use, peoples’ embodied                Minds Machine, 1998; 8(3): 443-434.
experience, time and social cultural interactions.
                                                                        [21] Gibbs RW. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought Language and
                                                                        Understanding, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1994.

REFERENCES                                                              [22] Gibbs RW. Embodiment and Cognitive Science, Cambridge,
                                                                        Cambridge University Press. 1992.
[1] Jilala H. The Artistic Uses of Metaphors in Constructing Meanings
and Messages in New Generation Songs in Tanzania. MA Dissertation       [23] Steen G. Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical
(Unpublished), University of Dares Salaam. 2008.                        Approach, London, Longman. 1994.

[2] Haas JP, Gesthuizen T. MASHINDANO! Competitive Music                [24] Hester MB. The Meaning of Poetic Metaphor: An Analysis in the
Performance in East Africa, Mkuki na Nyota Publishers. 2000.            Light of Wittgenstein’s Claim
                                                                        that Meaning is Use, Paris, Mouton and Co. The Hague. 1967.
[3] Senkoro FEMK. Rethinking Popular Arts and Culture in the 21st
Century East Africa, Celebrating 30 years of CODESRIA. 2003.            [25] Leech GN. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry, New York,
                                                                        Longman Group inc. Limited. 1991.
Jilala   67

[26] Hedley J. Power in Verse. Metaphor and Metonymy in the
Renaissance Lyric, University Park and London, The Pennsylvania
State University Press. 1998.

[27] Johnson M. The Body in the Mind, Chicago, University of Chicago
Press. 1987.

[28] Babuts N. Reading Poetry: Metaphors as Instruments of Discovery
Symposium, (Washington, D.C.). 2004; 57(4): 211 – 29.
You can also read