Health hazard prospecting by modeling wind transfer of metal-bearing dust from mining waste dumps: application to Jebel Ressas Pb-Zn-Cd abandoned ...

Page created by Allan Lopez
 
CONTINUE READING
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951
DOI 10.1007/s10653-014-9610-y

 ORIGINAL PAPER

Health hazard prospecting by modeling wind transfer
of metal-bearing dust from mining waste dumps: application
to Jebel Ressas Pb–Zn–Cd abandoned mining site (Tunisia)
Manel Ghorbel • Marguerite Munoz              •

Fabien Solmon

Received: 29 September 2013 / Accepted: 6 March 2014 / Published online: 24 April 2014
 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Abstract This work presents a modeling approach                  5.74 and 0.0768 lg/m3 for measured wind speed
to simulate spatial distribution of metal contamination          values up to 22 m/s. Preferential areas of contamina-
in aerosols with evaluation of health hazard. This               tion were determined in agricultural lands to the NW
approach offers the advantage to be non-intrusive, less          from the source dump where Pb and Cd exceeded
expensive than sampling and laboratory analyses. It              guidelines up to a distance of 1,200 m. The secondary
was applied to assess the impact of metal-bearing dust           spreading directions were SW and E, toward the
from mining wastes on air quality for a nearby                   village. Health hazard prospecting shown that a major
community and agricultural lands in Jebel Ressas                 part of the village was exposed to contaminated dust
(Tunisia) locality. Dust emission rates were calculated          and that daily hazard quotient (HQ) values reached
using existing parameterization adapted to the con-              locally 118 and 158, respectively, for Pb and Cd
tamination source composed of mining wastes. Metal               during the study period. However, HQ variations
concentrations were predicted using a Gaussian model             in the village are high, both temporally and
(fugitive dust model) with, as input: emission rates,            geographically.
dump physical parameters and meteorological data
measured in situ for 30 days in summertime. Metal                Keywords Dust  Metals  Mining wastes 
concentration maps were built from calculated PM10               Transfer modeling  Air quality  Health hazard
particle concentrations. They evidence the areas where
Pb and Cd concentrations exceeded WHO guidelines
(0.5 and 0.005 lg/m3, respectively). Maximum con-
centrations of Pb and Cd in PM10 are, respectively, of
                                                                 Introduction
M. Ghorbel
Laboratoire de Ressources Minérales Et Environnement            Mining activities can generate high quantities of fine-
(RME), Tunis El Manar University, 2020 Tunis, Tunisia            grained wastes, which were abandoned in the past and
                                                                 left exposed to meteoric and wind erosion.
M. Ghorbel (&)  M. Munoz
Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET),              Some studies have addressed dust emission from
UMR 5563, Toulouse, France                                       active mining sites and quarries linked to crushing,
e-mail: ghorbel@get.obs-mip.fr                                   grinding or transport (Chaulya et al. 2003; Sinha and
                                                                 Banerjee 1997; Sinha 1995; Kakosimos et al. 2011).
F. Solmon
International Center for Theoretical Physics, Strada             Such results are used to optimize the material process
Costiera, 34151 Trieste, Italy                                   in order to reduce the negative impact on the areas in

                                                                                                             123
936                                                                        Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

the neighborhood. But studies on dust emission and          these elements, air quality guidelines of 5 ng/m3 and
transfer from abandoned mining wastes are missing           0.5 lg/m3, respectively, for Cd and Pb were estab-
except for recent monitoring study of suspending            lished (WHO 2000; Baars et al. 2001).
particulate matter (Cigagna et al. 2014), and contam-          Dust aerosol is a very relevant factor in the
ination wind dispersion is generally addressed with a       Mediterranean climate and social environments. A
descriptive approach of contamination impact on             preliminary study on health hazard assessment of
surrounding soils. Modeling approach for quantifica-        direct dust ingestion has been addressed in Jebel
tion of airborne metal concentration and spatial            Ressas site as a representative site of Pb–Zn–Cd
representation of contamination dispersion is still not     mining sites from northern Tunisia (Ghorbel et al.
well advanced, neither are addressed the parameters         2010). The results indicated that the population is
which influence dust emission from mining wastes. In        exposed to Pb and Cd through direct ingestion of
fact, wind erosion of mining wastes may be addressed        deposited dust in the village transferred from fine-
as emission of fugitive dust which is defined as dust       grained treatment wastes dumped close to the village
that could not be conducted through a confined path.        and farming lands.
Concentrations of fugitive dust released from a surface        For a more complete investigation of exposure to
vary greatly depending on the nature and the area of        metals around the mining site, air quality has been
the sources and on other factors such as surface            investigated over an area comprising the mining
roughness and weather conditions (Trindade et al.           site, the village and the farmlands. The dust
1981; Marticorena and Bergametti 1995; Alfaro and           emissions and concentrations of airborne metals
Gomes 2001).                                                have been calculated for the PM10 (particulate
   In Tunisia, numerous Pb–Zn–Cd mining sites have          matter of a grain size equal or less than 10 microns)
been abandoned with large amounts of mining wastes          fraction which is the inhalable particle size usually
exposed to wind erosion. They are usually adjacent to       taken into consideration by health and environment
villages and farmlands. Mediterranean climate pro-          organizations (WHO, USEPA). The evaluation was
motes spreading of metallic contamination toward air,       conducted on a 24-h average concentration basis for
soil and habitations, so that population may be             1 month in summer season. In addition, maps of
seriously exposed.                                          metal concentrations in inhalable particulate matter
   Many studies have evidenced the relationship             over the studied area were performed and compared
between environmental metal contamination and               to the air quality guidelines in order to determine
people poisoning (Zhuang et al. 2009; Von Braun             the location of population potentially at risk and
et al. 2002; Malcoe et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2005). Metal-   hazard quotients (HQs) have been estimated to
contaminated dust can cause various diseases after          evaluate the level of hazard for population health
exposure of the population in the neighborhood to high      over the village.
levels of metals through inhalation, ingestion and skin
contact.
   Knowledge about air quality and air pollution is         Site presentation
fundamental to prevent health risk (Zou et al. 2009). In
humans, the pulmonary deposition and absorption of          The Jebel Ressas mining site is located 30 km south of
inhaled chemicals can have direct consequences for          Tunis where Pb exploitation and Zn exploitation were
health. But in the literature, health hazard has been       conducted during almost 70 years. The Jebel Ressas
mainly calculated from metal doses incorporated by          village stands at the foot of the Jebel Ressas Mountain
consumption of contaminated food crops, drinking            where the Pb–Zn extraction zone was located. It is
water or soil [lead and blood poisoning is now              bordered southwards by the former ore processing
established for children due to their hand-to-mouth         plant and westwards by the treatment dumps (Fig. 1a).
and pica behavior (Carrizales et al. 2006; Malcoe et al.    Almost two millions of tons of gravimetry and
2002)].                                                     flotation wastes were generated by the ore treatment
   Cadmium, lead and their compounds are classified         and dumped in three flattop dumps, DI, DII and DIII
carcinogens. In addition, various effects are evidenced     (Fig. 1b). Next to the western side of the dumps are the
for nervous, renal and cardiovascular systems. For          farming lands.

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                              937

Fig. 1 Jebel Ressas site
location

Table 1 Metals content in the mining waste dumps DI, DII,            No specific management was conceived to prevent
DIII and surface DIII and reference concentrations in soils for   erosion and chemical alteration of mining waste
comparison                                                        dumps, and no vegetation has grown on these dumps.
                           Pb (wt%)    Zn (wt%)    Cd (mg/kg)     The northern dump DIII is the largest one with a
                                                                  surface of 35,250 m2 and is exposed to the westerly
DI                         1.27        5.20        170
                                                                  and northwesterly prevailing winds which favor
DII                        0.09        2.02        110
                                                                  contaminated dust transfer toward the village.
DIII                       2.30        7.11        290
                                                                     The study area was chosen to assess the dispersion of
DIII surface               2.96        9.27        360
                                                                  the contamination by wind process around the waste
Reference                  0.01        0.03        2.0
                                                                  dumps. The total surface is of 3.9 9 5 km2. It includes
 concentrations
 in soils (Baize 1997)                                            the western flank of Ressas Mountain, the waste dumps,
                                                                  Jebel Ressas village, farmlands and HMA stream.

                                                                  Methodology
    The waste materials have a weak cohesion and fine
grain size dominated by silts and clay. Metal-bearing
                                                                  In this work, we considered only DIII dump (Fig. 1b)
minerals consisted of carbonates (cerussite, smithson-
                                                                  as significant dust source in the model for the
ite, hydrozincite), silicates (hemimorphite, willemite),
                                                                  following reasons:
sulfides (sphalerite and galena) and iron oxyhydroxide
enriched in Pb and Cd (Ghorbel et al. 2010; Ghorbel               •   its large surface and its high concentrations in Pb
2012). Pb, Zn and Cd concentrations in the waste                      and Zn and Cd compared to the other two dumps,
dumps and on a representative sample of the surface of            •   simplification of the modeling operation by reduc-
the dump DIII are given in Table 1.                                   ing the number of sources and parameters.

                                                                                                               123
938                                                                       Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Dust transfer modeling approach                            the time and the volume that are flagged on the counter
                                                           of air volume were noted.
Dust emission and aerosol concentration modeling
                                                           Aerosols analysis
An emission model adapted from a desert dust
emission parameterization used in meteorological           Pb and Cd in PM10 were analyzed after total acid
and climate model (Marticorena and Bergametti              digestion with HF and HNO3. The protocol was
1995; Alfaro et al. 1997) was adapted to the site          conducted with four blank filters, one chemistry blank
conditions and used to calculate dust emission rates of    and one international standard of urban incinerator ash
the source of contamination. The generated emission        (SKO1).
data were then included in a Gaussian dispersion              The solutions were analyzed with an ICP-MS
model to obtain estimations airborne dust concentra-       Agilent 7500. Isobaric interferences have been cor-
tions. Details about the modeling approach used are        rected with automatic calculations and polyatomic
given in the ‘‘Supplementary data’’ part.                  interference has been corrected by the operator of the
                                                           machine.
Spatial distribution of airborne metal concentrations         Analysis of blanks shows that contamination from
                                                           handling does not exceed 0.3 ppb for Pb while Cd
Pb and Cd mean concentrations over the summer              remains below the limit of detection of the machine (0,
month are represented as contour maps to allow             01 ppb).
visualization of the contamination extension and              For Pb and Cd, standard analyses show that the
intensity. For this purpose, we used Surfer software.      protocol yields are between 92 and 125 %.

Meteorological data                                        Health hazard quotient evaluation

Wind parameters were measured with an Oregon               The modeling of air metallic concentrations allows us
Scientific WMR200 weather station installed on the         to address health hazard.
roof terrace of the nearest house to DIII dump at a           Calculation has been performed for PM10 which is
height of 7.5 m of the ground surface.                     an inhalable fraction that may remain suspended in the
   The station is equipped with a wind vane anemom-        atmosphere for weeks and can penetrate deeply in the
eter which measures speeds and gusts of wind in m/s.       lungs passages.
The weather data were recorded every minute by a              In order to estimate health hazard for Pb and Cd, the
central unit for 30 days between July 13 and August        HQ for human health is obtained by dividing metal
12, 2009. At the end of this period, these data were       concentrations in airborne PM10 (lg/m3) by the air
retrieved from the central unit to a computer via an       quality guideline values for these elements (USEPA
USB cable.                                                 2011).
                                                              If HQ [ 1, the exposure level is higher than the
Analytical approach for modeling validation                guideline value, then there is a potential risk for the
                                                           receptor.
Aerosol sampling

An aerosol sampler was used to collect PM10 on the         Results and discussion
roof terrace of the nearest house to DIII dump behind
the meteorological station, to measure the suspended       Measured parameters
particle concentrations. The sampler conducts a vol-
ume of air through a particle size separator for PM10.     Wind data
These particles are collected on Zefluor Teflon filters.
   Filters were replaced every 24 h during the first       During the measurement period, wind gusts ranged
7 days of the 1-month study period. During each            from 0 to 22 m/s. The rose of hourly mean wind
manipulation, the sampler was stopped, and the date,       direction shows that the dominant wind is N (26 % of

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                                    939

                                                                 Fig. 3 Grain size distribution of the mining waste on DIII dump
                                                                 surface

                                                                 the study period would be representative of the
                                                                 summer season.

                                                                 Temperature
Fig. 2 Rose of hourly mean wind direction in Jebel Ressas site
between July 13th and August 12th, 2009 and wind frequencies
(%)                                                              Hourly mean temperatures were calculated from field
                                                                 measurements. Over the study period, they ranged
                                                                 between 20 and 47 C.
Table 2 Wind frequencies percentage given by velocity
intervals and directions
                                                                 Pasquill stability classes and mixing heights
Hourly mean wind     N    NE   E     SE   S    SW    W    NW
velocity intervals
                                                                 Information about Pasquill stability class and mixing
V B 1 m/s            20   20   16    21   18   19     5   21     height must be given as input data in FDM model. We
1 \ V B 5 m/s        63   57   52    56   56   47    47   56     obtained them from the Web site of NOAA (2010)
5 \ V B 10 m/s       17   23   32    21   22   34    47   23     (Air Resource Laboratory). These data are specific for
V [ 10 m/s            0    0     0   2     4    0     1    0     our period and locality.
                                                                    Pasquill stability classes are between A and F and
                                                                 are noted, respectively, from 1 to 6 with respect to
the total observations) (Fig. 2). SE winds are the               format of input files to FDM.
second dominant direction with a frequency of 18 %                  Mixing height level ranges between 61 and
of the total observations during this summertime.                3,320 m.
Considering their high velocity occurrence (Table 2)
with their high frequency, the SE winds were the most
efficient winds for dust emission during this period.            Grain size data
Wind toward the village was less frequent and less
violent.                                                         Grain size analysis of the surface sample of DIII dump
   Tunis-Carthage is the closest meteorological sta-             shows that sand fraction (63–2,000 lm) is dominant
tion to Jebel Ressas site. Meteorological statistics in          (85 %). The sand fraction would be carried in saltation
this station between October 2001 and August 2013                and would generate emission flux. PM10 is the particle
show that mean wind speed in summer season                       fraction of a grain size equal or below 10 lm. It makes
(August, July and June) is 5 m/s and dominant wind               3.5 % of the whole sample (Fig. 3).
is NNE as it is mentioned in Windfinder Web site                    Emission model calculates emitted particle quanti-
(2013). These results are concordant with our in situ            ties for each diameter class previously defined in the
measurements; thus, our derived modeling results over            code. So that mean diameter of each class and the

                                                                                                                    123
940                                                                              Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Table 3 Grain size distribution of emitted PM10 from the          Table 5 PM10 emission flux for the in situ measured wind
surface of DIII dump                                              speed interval and corresponding emission modes
Diameter class         [0.1; 1]   [1; 2.5]   [2.5; 5]   [5; 10]   Wind speed         PM10 emission          Emission mode
 intervals (lm)                                                   (m/s)              flux (g/m2/s)
Mean diameter (lm)     0.55       1.75       3.75       7.50
                                                                  0                  0.00 9 10?00           Aerodynamic
Emitted fraction       0.17       0.19       0.19       0.45                                                 entrainment
                                                                  1                  2.13 9 10-10
                                                                  2                  1.71 9 10-09
                                                                  3                  5.76 9 10-09
                                                                  4                  1.36 9 10-08
Table 4 Values of overall aerodynamic roughness (z0g)             5                  2.66 9 10-08
rounded to the tenth for the dominant wind directions measured
in Jebel Ressas site                                              6                  4.61 9 10-08
                                                                  7                  7.31 9 10-08
Wind direction                           Overall aerodynamic
                                                                  8                  1.09 9 10-07
                                         roughness z0g (lm)
                                                                  9                  1.55 9 10-07
SE                                       260                      10                 2.45 9 10-05           Saltation
N                                        240                      11                 8.71 9 10-04
NW                                       340                      12                 5.68 9 10-03
                                                                  13                 5.96 9 10-03
                                                                  14                 4.15 9 10-02
associated emitted fraction were considered as grain              15                 2.95 9 10-02
size data for FDM input (Table 3).                                16                 3.18 9 10-02
                                                                  17                 3.80 9 10-02
Roughness values (z0g)                                            18                 4.69 9 10-02
                                                                  19                 6.03 9 10-02
Surface roughness values for the three directions are             20                 2.49 9 10-01
given in Table 4.
                                                                  21                 1.49 9 10-01
   For the period from July 13 to August 12, 2009, the
                                                                  22                 1.62 9 10-01
estimation of the emission flux was made with the
roughness of 260 lm, corresponding to the most
efficient wind measured during this period able to
generate dust emission.                                              The most elevated emission rates are noted for days
                                                                  6, 11, 12, 28 and 30. For these days, wind gusts more
Dust emission rate                                                than 10 m/s were the most frequent over the measure-
                                                                  ment period. This high PM10 emission rate due to the
PM10 emission flux was calculated for the wind speed              fine grain size and weak cohesion of the mining wastes
interval [0; 22 m/s] (Table 5) that was registered                would be even higher with the violent winds which
in situ.                                                          occur occasionally in this region. In those cases, the
   Wind speed and surface roughness are the two                   influence of the variation in the wind direction on the
principle variables that control emission flux. For low           surface roughness would necessary be addressed for
wind speed (\10 m/s in our study case), the particles             accurate emission estimation.
are initially mobilized by aerodynamic entrainment.                  However, the values obtained in this study are
For high wind speed (C10 m/s), saltation is imple-                similar to those of Chane Kon et al. (2007), who
mented and emission flux increases rapidly.                       calculated emission values that reach 3.5 9 10-3 g/
   Then, mean daily dust emission rate from the                   m2/s on the flattop of a mining waste in Mantos
source (dump DIII) was calculated to have a visibil-              Blancos (Chile) and where the maximum speed of
ity on daily variations. The flux interval obtained               wind during the measurement period was 13 m/s. On
is between 2.46 9 10-6 and 2.50 9 10-3 g/m2/s                     the other hand, emission rates calculated in this work
(Fig. 4).                                                         are significantly lower than the values of Neumann

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                         941

et al. (2009), who measured an interval between 1 and    Table 6 Calculated Pb and Cd concentration range in airborne
4 g/m2/s of PM10 with simulations in tunnel of           PM10 over Jebel Ressas study site
emission from mining waste.                              Element (lg/m3)          PM10
                                                                                  Pb                   Cd
Pb and Cd concentrations in airborne PM10
particles                                                Maximum                  5.74                 7.68 9 10-2
                                                                                              -13
                                                         Minimum                  3.84 9 10            5.14 9 10-15
Calculated Pb and Cd concentrations in airborne
PM10

                                                         Table 7 Daily metal concentrations in PM10 sampled in the
Dust emission rates were integrated in FDM to
                                                         village
calculate PM10 airborne concentrations.
   Pb and Cd daily concentrations in airborne PM10       Day                  Pb (lg/m3)                  Cd (lg/m3)
were calculated on a grid of 2,030 points covering the   D1                   0.03                          0.0002
study area more than 30 days of modeling. Thereby,       D2                   0.03                          0.0004
60,900 concentration values were obtained for each       D3                   0.012                      \0.0002
metal.                                                   D4                   0.12                          0.0016
   Then, we calculated the mean metal concentration      D5                   0.07                          0.0008
in each point over the whole period to obtain            D6                   0.03                          0.0004
representative values for summer month. Table 6
                                                         D7                   0.01                          0.0002
gives a summary of the mean metal concentrations
intervals obtained for the considered set of points.
                                                         Comparison between modeling and direct analysis
                                                         results on the sampling point
Measured Pb and Cd concentrations in airborne
PM10                                                     Pb and Cd calculated and analyzed concentrations
                                                         were set up on the same figures (Fig. 5a, b).
Concentrations of metals in collected airborne              Both the shapes of the two curves for Pb and Cd and
PM10 on the terrace roof in the Jebel Ressas             the orders of magnitude of concentrations obtained
village were converted in lg/m3 with respect to air      through direct measurement and modeling are similar,
volume (m3) corresponding to each aerosol sample         so modeled values can be validated. Some discrepancy
(Table 7).                                               between the two kinds of values can be explained
   Pb concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 0.12 lg/m3,     because the model considers that, for every 24 h, the
and Cd concentrations were two orders of magnitude       beginning aerosol concentration is zero, which means
lower with a minimum below 0.0002 lg/m3.                 that the atmosphere is perfectly clean before each 24-h

Fig. 4 Mean daily dust
emission rate for PM10
(particulate matter B10 lm)
from the surface of the waste
dump DIII

                                                                                                         123
942                                                                                   Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Fig. 5 Calculated and analyzed a concentrations of Pb in the PM10 fraction in air, b concentrations of Cd in the PM10 fraction in air

calculation. However, in reality, the atmosphere is                  above 10 m/s was higher and so their efficiency for
never pure and there may be quantities of particles that             dust emission and transfer.
remain suspended in the air after a windy day for many                   Then, agricultural lands and farms are particularly
hours before they eventually settle down. This fact                  exposed to contamination during the summer season.
explains the underestimation of low concentrations by                Maximum concentrations of Pb and Cd in PM10 are,
FDM. Such an agreement between measured and                          respectively, of 5.74 and 0.0768 lg/m3 (Table 6) in a
predicted FDM data was already shown for dust                        farm located at few hundreds of meter NW DIII dump
concentrations in air generated by a cement plant                    and receiving SE wind with a speed up to 22 m/s.
(Abdul-Wahab 2006).                                                      Due to the secondary NW winds, the village which
                                                                     is concentrated in the few tens of meters SE from DIII
Spatial representation of calculated Pb and Cd                       waste dump is also under the heaviest metals contam-
concentrations in airborne PM10                                      ination zone shown in Fig. 6.
                                                                         SW sector is the area likely to be less contaminated
The maps of the spatial distribution of concentrations               during the measurement period due to most frequent
in the air were dressed (Fig. 6). This spatial distribu-             wind speeds are below 5 m/s, which protect it from
tion uses Pb and Cd monthly mean concentrations                      contaminated dust.
obtained for the 2,030 receptor points.                                  In fact, season variation in meteorological param-
   These maps highlight that metal distributions display             eters especially wind direction and speed has an
an eleven branches star centered on the source (DIII                 important control on air quality. Particularly, because
waste dump) and concentrations decrease with distance                the surface roughness value depends on wind direc-
from the source area over several orders of magnitude                tion, coupling both parameters in the emission model
pending on the direction. On the study site, minimum Pb              would improve the dust emission flux estimation.
and Cd concentrations are in the order of 10-12 and
10-14 lg/m3, respectively, and they are considered as
negligible below 10-4 and 10-6 lg/m3 (several thou-                  Health hazard prospecting
sands of times lower than the recommended values).
   Wind transfer is most important toward NW and                     Spatial representation
less important toward E and N. Although the prevail-
ing winds are from the N and NW, the transport is                    In order to obtain an overall vision of the potential
mainly by easterly winds because their frequency of                  health hazard area from the modeled data obtained on

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                            943

Fig. 6 Spatial distribution of 1 month mean Pb concentrations and mean Cd concentrations in airborne PM10

                                                                  metal-bearing PM10 in the area of Jebel Ressas for
                                                                  each of the 2,030 receptor points used in the modeling
                                                                  process, Pb and Cd mean concentrations calculated for
                                                                  the considered summer month and exceeding WHO
                                                                  (2000) air quality guidelines are displayed in Fig. 7.
                                                                  WHO air quality guidelines are 0.5 lg/m3 for Pb and
                                                                  5 ng/m3 for Cd.
                                                                     In the side of agricultural land, a tenth of farms
                                                                  are concerned by the potential health hazard up to a
                                                                  distance of about 1,200 m from the mining waste
                                                                  dumps in the NW direction and of about 700 m
                                                                  toward W direction. In this area, several farms are
                                                                  concerned both for exposure of inhabitants to metals
                                                                  by inhalation and for possible contamination of
                                                                  locally grown agricultural products which may enter
                                                                  the food chain and increase the indirect exposure to
                                                                  metals.
                                                                     Although the village of Jebel Ressas is not in
                                                                  the main wind directions, it is also exposed to
                                                                  contamination by the yearly prevailing NW wind
                                                                  due to its location close to the waste dumps. Pb
                                                                  and Cd concentrations in PM10 can exceed guide-
Fig. 7 Spatial representation of areas where Pb and Cd
                                                                  lines up to a distance of 500 m to the east of DIII
concentrations in airborne PM10 exceeded WHO air quality          dump, so that the major area of the village is
guidelines                                                        concerned.

                                                                                                              123
944                                                                             Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Table 8 Maximum, minimum and mean concentrations of Pb and Cd in airborne PM10 calculated on the basis of the 30 days study
period individually for each point in the village
Village points    PM10 Pb (lg/m3)                                        PM10 Cd (lg/m3)
                  Max                Min               Mean              Max                Min               Mean

1                 5.82               3.12 9 10-05      5.02 9 10-01      7.79 9 10-02       4.17 9 10-07      6.71 9 10-03
                                              -06                -01                 -01                -08
2                 8.54               3.11 9 10         9.36 9 10         1.14 9 10          4.17 9 10         1.25 9 10-02
                                              -05                -01                 -02                -07
3                 1.70               2.28 9 10         2.75 9 10         2.28 9 10          3.05 9 10         3.68 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
4                 4.65               0.00              2.42 9 10         6.22 9 10          0.00              3.24 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
5                 2.91               0.00              1.33 9 10         3.89 9 10          0.00              1.78 9 10-03
6                 6.82 9 10-01       0.00              3.19 9 10-02      9.13 9 10-03       0.00              4.27 9 10-04
                                              -06                                    -01                -08
7                 59.0               5.84 9 10         4.83              7.90 9 10          7.82 9 10         6.46 9 10-02
                                                                 -01                 -02
8                 5.19               0.00              3.07 9 10         6.94 9 10          0.00              4.11 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
9                 5.15               0.00              3.11 9 10         6.89 9 10          0.00              4.16 9 10-03
                                              -05                -01                 -02                -07
10                6.51               1.80 9 10         4.13 9 10         8.71 9 10          2.40 9 10         5.53 9 10-03
11                6.00               0.00              3.47 9 10-01      8.02 9 10-02       0.00              4.64 9 10-03
12                3.03               0.00              2.06 9 10-01      4.06 9 10-02       0.00              2.76 9 10-03
13                3.45               0.00              2.31 9 10-01      4.61 9 10-02       0.00              3.08 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
14                3.14               0.00              1.98 9 10         4.20 9 10          0.00              2.65 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
15                3.69               0.00              2.41 9 10         4.94 9 10          0.00              3.22 9 10-03
16                3.78               0.00              2.36 9 10-01      5.06 9 10-02       0.00              3.15 9 10-03
                                              -08                -01                 -02                -10
17                3.99               5.07 9 10         2.58 9 10         5.34 9 10          6.79 9 10         3.45 9 10-03
                                                                                     -01
18                37.1               0.00              3.53              4.97 9 10          0.00              4.73 9 10-02
                                                                 -01                 -02
19                2.20               0.00              1.43 9 10         2.95 9 10          0.00              1.91 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -02
20                1.75               0.00              1.03 9 10         2.34 9 10          0.00              1.38 9 10-03
                                                                                     -01
21                19.8               0.00              1.03              2.65 9 10          0.00              1.38 9 10-02
22                3.84               0.00              2.57 9 10-01      5.14 9 10-02       0.00              3.43 9 10-03
                                                                 -01                 -01
23                15.6               0.00              6.80 9 10         2.09 9 10          0.00              9.10 9 10-03
                            -01                                  -02                 -03
24                7.35 9 10          0.00              2.62 9 10         9.84 9 10          0.00              3.50 9 10-04
                            -02                                  -04                 -04
25                1.68 9 10          0.00              5.59 9 10         2.24 9 10          0.00              7.48 9 10-06
                            -05                                  -07                 -07
26                1.58 9 10          0.00              6.76 9 10         2.12 9 10          0.00              9.04 9 10-09
27                3.11 9 10-04       0.00              1.04 9 10-05      4.16 9 10-06       0.00              1.39 9 10-07
28                4.60 9 10-03       0.00              1.54 9 10-04      6.16 9 10-05       0.00              2.05 9 10-06
                            -04                                  -06                 -06
29                1.52 9 10          0.00              5.09 9 10         2.04 9 10          0.00              6.81 9 10-08
                            -06                                  -07                 -07
30                8.53 9 10          0.00              2.85 9 10         1.14 9 10          0.00              3.81 9 10-09

Estimation of health hazard for the Jebel Ressas                   In order to prospect more in detail the potential
village population                                              health hazard in the village, we have considered
                                                                modeling data for 30 points covering the housing area.
Jebel Ressas village is of several hundreds of people           We calculated Pb and Cd concentration in airborne
living during the year in there. Thus, exposure to toxic        PM10 in each point for the 30-day period.
metals from mining waste may be qualified as chronic.              Table 8 gives maximum, minimum and mean
   In this case, health issue in the village should be          concentrations of Pb and Cd in airborne PM10
ideally treated at least, on the basis of 1-year data. In       individually for each point in the village more than
this modeling approach, we considered one summer                the study 30-day period. For Pb, concentrations vary
month to obtain data on the ‘‘worst case’’ knowing that         between 0 and 59 lg/m3 with a global mean value of
summer is the driest season with frequent strong wind           0.51 lg/m3. For Cd, concentrations vary between 0
which promotes contaminated dust emission.                      and 0.79 lg/m3 with a global mean value of

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                                   945

Table 9 Maximum, minimum and median values of health HQ related to Pb and Cd in Jebel Ressas village and calculated for each
day on the basis of the whole set of points in the village
Day            Health HQ for Pb                                               Health HQ for Cd
               Max                 Min               Median                   Max                 Min             Median

D1             0.22                \10-6             7 9 10-3                 0.3                \10-6            9 9 10-3
                                         -6                                                             -6
D2             3.64                \10               0.12                     4.88               \10              0.16
D3             0.18                \10-6             1.1 9 10-4               0.23               \10-6            1 9 10-4
                                         -6                    -6                                       -6
D4             0.04                \10               7 9 10                   0.05               \10              9 9 10-5
                                         -6                     -5                                      -6
D5             19.74               \10               2.3 9 10                 26.42              \10              3 9 10-5
D6             57.91               \10-6            \10-6                     77.5               \10-6            \10-6
                                         -6                                                             -6
D7             3.44                \10               0.06                     4.6                \10              0.08
D8             2.32                \10-6             7 9 10-3                 3.1                \10-6            9 9 10-3
                                         -6                                                             -6
D9             0.13                \10               0.0002                   0.17               \10              2 9 10-4
                                         -6                    -5                                       -6
D10            0.38                \10               9 9 10                   0.51               \10              1.2 9 10-4
D11            13.3                \10-6            6 9 10-6                  17.8               \10-6            8 9 10-6
D12            65.62               \10-6            \10-6                     87.82              \10-6            \10-6
D13            0.07                \10-6             0.012                    0.1                \10-6            0.016
                                         -6                    -5
D14            0.005               \10               7 9 10                   0.006              \10-6            9 9 10-5
                                         -6                    -5                                       -6
D15            0.37                \10               2 9 10                   0.5                \10              2.2 9 10-5
D16            1.79                \10-6             2 9 10-5                 2.39               \10-6            2.4 9 10-5
                                         -6                                                             -6
D17            4.15                \10               1.36                     5.55               \10              1.82
D18            3.66                \10-6             1.2 9 10-4               4.89               \10-6            1.6 9 10-4
                                         -6                    -5                                       -6
D19            1.84                \10               3 9 10                   2.46               \10              4 9 10-5
                                         -6                    -6                                       -6
D20            3.42                \10               2 9 10                   4.57               \10              3 9 10-6
                       -4                -6                    -5                      -4               -6
D21            6 9 10              \10               8 9 10                   8 9 10             \10              1.1 9 10-4
D22            1.02                \10-6             0.55                     1.37               \10-6            0.74
                                         -6
D23            13.02               \10               2.43                     17.42              \10-6            3.25
D24            2.85                \10-6             0.22                     3.82               \10-6            0.29
D25            1.27                \10-6             0.0021                   1.7                \10-6            3 9 10-3
                                         -6                    -5                                       -6
D26            3.4                 \10               2 9 10                   4.56               \10              3 9 10-5
D27            39.6                \10-6             6 9 10-5                 53                 \10-6            8 9 10-5
D28            118                 \10-6            \10-6                     158                \10-6            \10-6
                                         -6                    -3                                       -6
D29            0.09                \10               3 9 10                   0.12               \10              4 9 10-3
                                         -6               -6                                            -6
D30            19.72               \10              \10                       26.39              \10              \10-6
HQ values below 0.000001 are designed by \10-6

0.0069 lg/m3. Regarding reference metal concentra-                      Finally, daily metal concentrations in each point in
tions, both mean values slightly exceed WHO                          the village could make a very large interval, but a
guidelines.                                                          punctual mean value over a given study period gives a
   Moreover, in 24 points of the village, Pb and Cd                  more correct idea on the real concentrations taking
maximum concentrations exceed WHO guidelines.                        into account the air mixing effect.
   If we consider the global air quality during the                     To prospect the population exposure to contamina-
month through mean metal concentrations in each                      tion during the study period, a HQ has been calculated
point, six points in the village show mean Pb and Cd                 for each day for the whole set of points in the village.
concentrations above the guidelines.                                 The HQ defined as the ratio of the potential exposure

                                                                                                                  123
946                                                                              Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Fig. 8 Maximum and median values of health HQ due to Pb air contamination (all minimum values are\10-6 and only median values
[10-6 are represented)

to the substance and the level at which no adverse                  However, median HQ values are low for most of the
effects are expected. If the HQ is calculated to be equal        days. Only 5-day display values above 0.1 and only for
or less than 1, then no adverse health effects are               the 17th and the 23rd days, HQ exceeds 1 in more than
expected as a result of exposure. If the HQ is greater           the half of the considered points.
than 1, then adverse health effects are possible                    Extremely elevated health HQ is located in points
(USEPA 2011).                                                    very close to DIII and exposed to W wind which was
   So that HQs related to Pb and Cd are, respectively,           the third most efficient wind for contamination
given by:                                                        transfer over the study period.
                                                                    It appears that despite the smallness of the village,
HQðPbÞ                                                           there are large variations of the HQ related to the
    Calculated Pb concentration in airborne PM10                 distance from the source due to the W wind particles
  ¼
                     0:5lg=m3                                    transport capacity.
                                                                    Contamination of the media generally diminishes
HQðCdÞ                                                           with the distance from the contamination source
    Calculated Cd concentration in airborne PM10                 (Zhuang et al. 2009; Cangialosi et al. 2008), so that
  ¼                                                              related health risk should also decrease. It is clear that
                    0:005lg=m3
                                                                 distance from the source can be a useful, simple proxy
   Table 9 gives maximum, minimum and median                     for assessing exposure and assigning health effects.
health HQ for each of the 30 days of modeling for the               But in several papers, the results were opposite to
whole set of points in the village. Only HQ values above         the basic assumption of closer proximity equals
10-6 have been reported, considering it as a limit of            greater concentration and exposure (Cordier et al.
negligible HQ. Minimum HQ values are all below 10-6.             2004). Our study evidences that although the proxim-
   A diagram has been provided for Pb HQ values only             ity rule applies, air contamination is mainly related to
because Cd HQ values would have plot almost                      wind directions and velocities, hence to location
identical although they are slightly higher.                     relative to the source.
   Table 9 and Fig. 8 show large variations in HQs in               This study also evidences the variability of health
the village for each day. This fact is mainly related to         hazard variable more than 1 month. A more detailed
the daily variation of wind directions which controls            study along 1 year on the most exposed locations in
PM10 concentrations. So that, when contamination is              the village would be necessary to address the chronic
highly transferred toward a given direction, in other            exposure of the population under these conditions.
directions, metal concentrations could be almost zero.              In addition, reliable exposure estimation would
   Among the 30, 18-day display HQ above 1                       require detailed human activity data in order to
(HQ [ 1) in at least two points in the village.                  establish contact rates previously to any epidemiolog-
Maximum HQ values reach 118 for Pb and 158 for Cd.               ical study. Hence, human inhalation models quantify

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                           947

human chemical inhalation from contact with the               Finally, modeling allows quantitative prediction
relevant air pollutants (Fryer et al. 2006).               and spatial distribution of metal contamination with
                                                           evaluation of health hazard. This approach offers the
                                                           advantage of being non-intrusive for population and
Conclusion                                                 also less time and money consuming than in situ
                                                           sampling followed by laboratory analyses. It allows to
This study allowed assessing wind erosion of Jebel         target on areas of potential higher hazard.
Ressas wastes dump and then determine the residential         However, in order to improve the quality of the
and agricultural areas potentially impacted by mining      modeling, it will be necessary to use yearly weather
waste and where health hazard could occur, using an        data to obtain more realistic prediction of metals
emission model coupled to a transfer model (FDM).          transfer and more precise health hazard prediction. In
    Wind transfer of metallic contamination was stud-      addition, it will be necessary to carry out a calibration
ied during 1 month in summer season when wind              pattern of dust emission and transport in realizing:
erosion is likely most effective.
                                                           •   Measures of the emission rates on the ground to
    The concentrations in the air of PM10 were calcu-
                                                               calibrate key parameters,
lated, using meteorological data measured in situ, on a
                                                           •   Sampling of aerosols with collection duration short
set of receiving points, around the mining waste dump
                                                               enough to fit with variability of wind speed and
DIII, corresponding to an area of 19.5 km2.
                                                               direction and improve the accuracy of the calculation.
    During the study, maximum wind speed is 22 m/s
and the daily mean dust flux reaches 2.50 9 10-3 g/           A difficulty to be overcome will be to develop an
m2/s. This high PM10 emission rate due to the fine         aerosol sampling device able to collect a sufficient
grain size and weak cohesion of the mining wastes          amount for analysis.
would be even higher with the violent winds which
occur occasionally in this region.                         Acknowledgments We are grateful for the support provided
                                                           by the IRD Ph.D grant and the CMCU program (N09G 1003).
    Thus, the comparison with the few existing in the      We are indebted to Christiane Cavaré for the quality of her
literature for emission from mining waste does not         graphics.
lead to a generalization in particular due to the
diversity of both meteorological and surface physical
                                                           Supplementary data: methodology of dust emission
parameters from a site to another.
                                                           and aerosol concentration modeling
    For the considered period, spatial representation of
PM10 metal concentration results shows the prevail-
                                                           Dust emission calculation
ing migration of contamination mostly toward agri-
cultural lands and farms located in the NW of DIII
                                                           The dust emission rate is the sum of the direct soil
dump. The secondary spreading directions are SW and
                                                           particle aerodynamic entrainment [f (lg/m2/s)] and of
E, in particular toward the village of Jebel Ressas.
                                                           the vertical flux [F (lg/m2/s)] resulting from saltation
Moreover, Pb and Cd would exceed air quality
                                                           and sand-blasting processes.
guidelines in agricultural land and farms, up to a
                                                              The aerodynamic entrainment function (f) gives the
distance of 1,200 m and in the village up to a distance
                                                           emission rate of mobilized particles on the source
of 500 m.
                                                           surface in the absence of saltation at low wind speed
    Modeling and cartography results allow concluding
                                                           (Loosmore and Hunt 2000 in Shao 2008).
that health hazard should be expected after inhalation
of Pb and Cd bearing PM10 especially in the village        f ¼ 3:6U 3
where the population is concentrated but also in farms
on the main wind direction.                                where U  (m/s) is the friction velocity
    Daily and overall HQs are variable but frequently             KUðzÞ
very elevated (up to 158 for Cd and up to 118 for Pb)      U ¼
                                                                   ln zz0
which imposes a deeper investigation of the health
situation particularly on some locations close to the      K: von Karman’s constant, z: height above the surface,
waste dump.                                                m, z0: roughness height, m, U: wind speed, m/s, F is

                                                                                                           123
948                                                                                  Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

the emission flux generated by saltation when wind
speed is high enough.
   The vertical flux F of particles emitted is first based
on the calculation of the horizontal flux of soil
saltating particles G (g/m2/s) according to Marticorena
and Bergametti (1995):

                Z             "           2 #
      q                  Ut           Ut
G ¼ EC a U 3         1þ            1              dSrel ðdpÞddp
       g                 U            U
                dp                                                  Fig. 9 Schematic drawing of a surface waste ripple exposed to
                                                                    wind from different directions with parameters of shape used for
E: ratio of erodible to total surface (taken to 1 here), C:         aerodynamic roughness calculation
constant of proportionality with a value of 2.61
determined from wind tunnel experiments (White                      •   Plants and stones that are consistently exposed to
1979), qa: air density, g: gravity acceleration (m/s2),                 the wind. The roughness caused by these elements
dp: soil particles diameter (lm), Srel: relative surface                is uniform for all wind directions. Then, it is called
occupied by a soil aggregate bin of diameter dp (m2),                   isotropic roughness.
U  : friction velocity of wind (m/s). It depends on wind           •   Ripples with curvilinear forms have different
velocity and on aerodynamic roughness z0 of the                         fronts of exposure to wind according to their
eroded surface. Ut : threshold friction velocity of wind               directions (Fig. 9). Thus, the number of fronts
(m/s): minimal wind friction velocity able to mobilize                  (n) in front of the wind as well as their height
sand particles by saltation (cf Marticorena and                         (h) and their widths (b) are variable depending on
Bergametti 1995 for more details).                                      the direction of the wind. The effect of such
   Initially, this parameterization is designed for desert              anisotropic roughness varies with the orientation
dust emissions, and the soil aggregate distribution is                  of the ripple with respect to the direction of the
related to a given textural class using standard distri-                wind. Therefore, wind erosion will not be homo-
bution (e.g., Zakey et al. 2006). Here, the soil aggregate              geneous and amounts of emitted dust will vary
distribution has been defined directly from in situ                     with wind direction. This effect of anisotropic
measurements according to the following method.                         roughness has been studied to assess the conse-
   Samples from DIII surface have been taken in 5                       quences of the presence of grooves of labor in the
different points by scraping off the surface on 1–2 cm                  agricultural land on wind erosion (Saleh et al.
over several hundreds of cm2. The samples were                          1997; Armbrust et al. 1964).
homogenized to make one representative sample from                     On DIII, surface rough elements are spread in a
which 500 g were quartered, got rid of the fraction                 heterogeneous way. We distinguished between four
more than 2 mm and then analyzed for grain size.                    different parcels in their aspects of surface roughness
   First, dry grain size separation was performed with              which was measured for three wind directions:
an AFNOR column: 1,600, 1,250, 630, 400, 355, 250,
200, 150, 125, 80 and 63 lm.                                        •   in the N direction which is the dominant wind
   Then, grain size distribution of fraction below                      direction measured in situ during the period
63 lm was determined using a Coulter LS 200 laser                       between July 13th and August 12th, 2009.
granulometer with a small water volume. Measure-                    •   in the SE direction which is the second dominant
ment range is between 0.393 and 905 lm.                                 direction and for which strong winds were com-
   In the G formulation, the roughness length z0 (lm)                   mon during the period between July 13th and
is a very sensitive parameter. We have thus deter-                      August 12th, 2009.
mined the roughness from direct measurement of the                  •   in the NW direction which is the annual prevailing
surface of DIII mining waste dump.                                      direction known for the region.
   The surface of dump DIII contains erodible and                      We performed measurements of roughness on
non-erodible or rough elements. There are two types of              representative surfaces between 0.25 and 4 m2 accord-
rough elements:                                                     ing to the dimensions of the rough elements.

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                                     949

     For each parcel, we proceeded as follows:                Calculation of airborne dust concentrations
1.    We determined the number of isotropic ele-
                                                              PM10 concentrations (lg/m3) have been calculated
      ments (plants, rocks), their widths and their
                                                              with the fugitive dust model (FDM, Winges 1992).
      heights.
                                                              FDM is a Gaussian plume model designed for
2.    For each wind direction, we determined the
                                                              computing particle concentrations and deposition
      number of ripple-fronts exposed to the wind, the
                                                              rates from fugitive dust emissions. The model is well
      width (b) and the height (h) of each front. k
                                                              accepted by USEPA for this purpose. It incorporates
      represents the totality (n) of fronts (bh) exposed to
                                                              transport, dispersion and deposition of pollutants in
      the wind on a surface (s) with k = nbh/s.
                                                              the atmosphere, using input data for particulate matter
   Pending on the k value, z0 can be calculated               (particle diameter, density) and air parameters (wind
using one of the following equations (Marshall                velocity, wind direction, temperature) measured in the
1971; Jarvis et al. 1976; Garrat 1977; Raupach et al.         site together with flux of emitted PM10 from the
1980; Raupach 1991) where n, b and h are,                     emission model. For the 30 days, 720 data for hourly
respectively, the number, width and the height of             mean emission rate of PM10 were integrated on FDM.
the rough element and s is the measurement surface.              Pb and Cd concentrations in PM10 were calculated
So that, z0 = 0.005 h, if k \ 0.1 and z0 = (0.479             using metal content of dump DIII surface.
k - 0.001)h, if k [ 0.1.
   The aerodynamic roughness was calculated for the           Source and receptors
other wind directions in the same way.
   An overall roughness z0g which takes into account          The source, DIII waste dump, is assimilated to a
the different types of surfaces was calculated by             rectangle of 235 m 9 150 m.
summing the different roughness observed on the                  We considered 2,000 receptor points obtained with
dump and weighted by the fractions of surface they            a 100 9 100 m gridding over a surface of 20 km2. We
occupy.                                                       also added 30 points over the village.
   From the saltation flux, the aerosol vertical emis-
sion flux is finally calculated according to Alfaro et al.
(1997) approach as:
                                                            References
          p         di3
F ¼ G qp bpidp
          6         ei                                        Abdul-Wahab, S. A. (2006). Impact of fugitive dust emissions
                                                                   from cement plants on nearby communities. Ecological
where i represents three modes of a predefined log-                Modelling, 195(3), 338–348.
normal emission distribution. G: the saltation flux (lg/      Alfaro, S. C., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., & Maillé, M. (1997).
m2/s), qp: density of particles, b: proportionality                Modeling the size distribution of a soil aerosol produced by
                                                                   sandblasting. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(10),
constant, pidp : fraction of kinetic energy of particles           11239–11249.
of each diameter class dp able to generate aerosols of        Alfaro, S. C., & Gomes, L. (2001). Modeling mineral aerosol
mode i, di: mass of aerosols of mode i (g), ei: kinetic            production by wind erosion: Emission intensities and aer-
energy of aerosols of mode i (g cm2/s2).                           osol size distributions in source areas. Journal of Geo-
                                                                   physical Research, 106(16), 18075–18084.
   The total vertical flux is obtained by integrating all     Armbrust, D. V., Chepil, W. S., & Siddoway, F. H. (1964).
flux resulting from each diameter class of surface                 Effects of ridges on erosion of soil by wind. Soil Science.
particles and then by summing the quantities of                    Society of America, Proceedings, 28, 557–560.
emitted aerosol.                                              Baars, A. J., Theelen, R. M. C., Janssen, P. J. C. M., Hesse, J. M.,
                                                                   van Apeldoorn, M. E., Meijerink, M. C. M., Verdam, L., &
   The model we use did not consider the local                     Zeilmaker, M. J. (2001). Re-evaluation of human toxico-
turbulence related to the topography of the site. We               logical maximum permissible risk levels. RIVM report
alleviate this point by calculating emission rate with             711701025, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. http://www.rivm.
wind gusts measured every minute. Also, the surface                nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/711701025.pdf. Accessed Febru-
                                                                   ary 1, 2014.
moisture was not considered as we worked in summer            Baize, D. (1997). Teneurs totales en éléments traces métalliques
season.                                                            dans les sols (France). INRA Editions, Paris.

                                                                                                                     123
950                                                                                     Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951

Cangialosi, F., Intini, G., Liberti, L., Notarnicola, M., & Stell-          factors in relation to blood lead of Native American and
     acci, P. (2008). Health risk assessment of air emissions               white children: A community-based assessment of a former
     from a municipal solid waste incineration plant—A case                 mining area. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110,
     study. Waste Management, 28, 885–895.                                  221–231.
Carrizales, L., Raso, I., Tallez-Hernandez, J. I., Torres-Nerio,       Marshall, J. K. (1971). Drag measurements in roughness arrays
     R., Torres, A., Batres, L. E., et al. (2006). Exposure to              of varying density and distribution. Agricultural Meteo-
     arsenic and lead of children living near a copper-smelter in           rology, 8, 269–292.
     San Luis Potosi, Mexico: Importance of soil contamination         Neumann, C. M., Boulton, J. W., & Sanderson, S. (2009). Wind
     for exposure of children. Environmental Research, 101,                 tunnel simulation of enrironmental controls on fugitive
     1–10.                                                                  dust emission. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 520–529.
Chane Kon, L., Durucan, S., & Korre, A. (2007). The devel-             NOAA. (2010). Air Resource Laboratory. http://ready.arl.noaa.
     opment and application of a wind erosion model for the                 gov/READYcmet.php.
     assessment of fugitive dust emissions from mine tailings          Raupach, M. R. (1991). Saltation layers, vegetation canopies
     dumps. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and                and roughness lengths. Acta Mechanica, 1, 83–96.
     Environment, 21(3), 198–218.                                      Raupach, M. R., Thom, A. S., & Edwards, I. (1980). A wind-
Chaulya, S. K., Ahmad, M., Singh, R. S., Bandopadhyay, L. K.,               tunnel study of turbulent flow close to regularly arrayed
     Bondyopadhay, C., & Mondal, G. C. (2003). Validation of                rough surfaces. Boundary Layer Meteorology, 18,
     two air quality models for Indian mining conditions.                   373–397.
     Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 82, 23–43.               Saleh, A., Fryrear, D. W., & Bilbro, J. D. (1997). Aerodynamic
Cordier, S., Chevrier, C., Robert-Gnansia, E., Lorente, M.,                 roughness prediction from soil surface roughness mea-
     Brula, P., & Hours, M. (2004). Risk of congenital anom-                surement. Soil Science, 162, 205–210.
     alies in the vicinity of municipal solid waste incinerators.      Shao, Y. (2008). Physics and modeling of wind erosion. 2nd
     Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61,                revised and expanded edition. Berlin: Springer.
     8–15.                                                             Sinha, S. (1995). Quantification of fugitive particle emission
Fryer, M., Collins, C. D., Ferrier, H., Colvile, R. N., & Nie-              from line source in surface coal mine—An approach.
     uwenhuijsen, M. J. (2006). Human exposure modelling for                Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 15(5),
     chemical risk assessment: A review of current approaches               339–343.
     and research and policy implications. Environmental Sci-          Sinha, S., & Banerjee, S. P. (1997). Characterisation of haul road
     ence & Policy, 9, 261–274.                                             in Indian open cast iron ore mine. Atmospheric Environ-
Garrat, J. R. (1977). Aerodynamic roughness and mean monthly                ment, 31(17), 2809–2814.
     surface stress over Australia. CSIR, Division of Atmo-            Trindade, H. A., Pfeiffer, W. C., Londres, H., & Costa-Ribeiro,
     spheric Physics Technical paper, 29, 1–19.                             C. L. (1981). Atmospheric concentration of metals and
Ghorbel, M. (2012). Contamination métallique issue des                     total suspended particulates in Rio de Janeiro. Environ-
     déchets de l’ancien site minier de Jebel Ressas: modéli-             mental Science and Technology, 15, 84–88.
     sation des mécanismes de transfert et conception de cartes       USEPA. (2011). Glossary of Key Terms. http://www.epa.gov/
     d’aléa post-mine dans un contexte carbonaté et sous un               ttn/atw/natamain/gloss1.html.
     climat semi-aride. Evaluation du risque pour la santé hu-        von Braun, M. C., von Lindern, I. H., Khristoforova, N. K.,
     maine. PhD thesis. Tunis El manar univ and Toulouse univ.              Kachur, A. H., Yelpatyevsky, P. V., Elpatyevskaya, P. V.,
Ghorbel, M., Munoz, M., Courjault-Radé, P., Destrigneville, C.,            et al. (2002). Environmental lead contamination in the
     Souissi, R., Souissi, F., et al. (2010). Health risk assessment        Rudnaya Pristan-Dalnegorsk Mining and Smelter District,
     for human exposure by direct ingestion of Pb, Cd, Zn                   Russian Far East. Environmental Research, Section A, 88,
     bearing dust in the former miner’s village of Jebel Ressas             164–173.
     (NE Tunisia). European Journal of Mineralogy, 22,                 White, B. R. (1979). Soil transport by winds on Mars. Journal of
     639–649.                                                               Geophysical Research, 84, 4643–4651.
Jarvis, P. G., James, G. B., & Landsberg, J. J. (1976). Coniferous     WHO. (2000). Air quality guidelines for Europe (2nd ed.).
     forest. In J. L. Monteith (Ed.), Vegetation and the atmo-              WHO Regional Publications, European series, No 91.
     sphere (pp. 171–240). London: Academic Press.                     Windfinder. (2013). Statistiques du vent et du climat
Kakosimos, K. E., Assael, M. J., Lioumbas, J. S., & Spiridis, A.            Tunis-Carthage. http://fr.windfinder.com/windstats/wind
     S. (2011). Atmospheric dispersion modelling of the fugi-               statistic_tunis-carthage.htm.
     tive particulate matter from overburden dumps with                Winges, K. D. (1992). User’s guide for the fugitive dust model.
     numerical and integral models. Atmospheric Pollution                   Environmental Protection Agency Report: EPA-910/9-88-
     Research, 2, 24–33.                                                    202R.
Lee, J. S., Chon, H. T., & Kim, K. W. (2005). Human risk               Cigagna, M., Dentoni, V., Grosso, B., & Massacci, G. (2014).
     assessment of As, Cd, Cu and Zn in the abandoned metal                 Emissions of fugitive dust from mine dumps and tailing
     mine site. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 27,                  basins in South-Western Sardinia. In C. Drebenstedt & R.
     185–191.                                                               Singhal (Eds.), Mine planning and equipment selection
Loosmore, G. A., & Hunt, J. R. (2000). Below threshold, non                 (pp. 739–747). Berlin: Springer.
     abraded dust resuspension. Journal of Geophysical                 Marticorena, B., & Bergametti, G. (1995). Modelling the
     Research, 105, 20663–20671.                                            atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust
Malcoe, L. H., Lynch, R. A., Crozier Keger, M., & Skaggs, V. J.             emission scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research,
     (2002). Lead sources, behaviors, and socioeconomic                     100(8), 16415–16430.

123
Environ Geochem Health (2014) 36:935–951                                                                                  951

Zakey, A. S., Solmon, F., & Giorgi, F. (2006). Implementation     Zou, B., Wilson, J. G., Zhan, F. B., & Zeng, Y. (2009). Air
    and testing of a desert dust module in a regional climate         pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epide-
    model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 4687–4704.           miological studies. Journal of Environmental Monitoring,
Zhuang, P., McBrideb, M. B., Xiaa, H., Li, N., & Li, Z. (2009).       11, 475–490.
    Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food
    crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China.
    Science of the Total Environment, 407, 1551–1561.

                                                                                                                  123
You can also read