Helsinki region transport system planning - public transport and beyond 24.8.2017 @Suvekooli
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Helsinki region transport
system planning
- public transport and beyond
24.8.2017 @Suvekooli
TAPANI TOURU
Contents HSL stategy and operations Helsinki transport system planning MAL 2019 plan • ”Public transport in the era of big changes in transport sector” Vocabulary HSL = Helsinki region transport HLJ = Helsinki region transport system plan MAL = Land use, Housing and Transport (plan)
HSL in General
What does HSL do?
Is responsible for the preparation of the Helsinki Region
Transport System Plan (HLJ).
Plans and organizes public transport in the region and work to
improve its operating conditions.
Procures bus, tram, Metro, ferry and commuter train services.
Approves the public transport fare and ticketing system as well
as public transport fares.
Is responsible for public transport marketing and passenger
information.
Organizes ticket sales and is responsible for ticket inspections.
HSL – Strategy into action
Cooperation area and
expansion of HSL
Helsinki Region
• Land area 3700 km2
• 14 municipalities
• Population 1.38 million
HSL
• 6 founding municipalities: Helsinki, Espoo,
Kauniainen, Vantaa, Kerava, Kirkkonummi.
• Sipoo joined in 2012.
• Tuusula and Siuntio will join in 2018.
According to its charter, HSL may
expand to cover all 14 municipalities
in the region.
HSL Organisation 1.1.2017
Executive Director Suvi Rihtniemi
Transport System Public Transport Customer Experience and
and Research Director of Department Sales
Tero Anttila
Director of Department Mari Flink
Director of Department Public Transport Systems
Head of Group Customer Experience
Sini Puntanen
Johanna Wallin (temporary Juha Puolitaival) Head of Group Laura Sundell
Transport System Route Network and Timetable Planning Communications and Marketing
Head of Group Head of Group Marketing and Communications
Tapani Touru Jonne Virtanen Manager Sari Kotikangas
Procurement Sales
Traffic Surveys Sales Manager Matias Sarkkinen
Head of Group
Head of Group
Mika Häyrynen Customer Service
Marko Vihervuori
Public Tranport Operating Conditions Head of Group Eija Jalo
Head of Group Ticket Inspection
Veera Laiterä (temporary Ville Uusi-Rauva) Head of Unit Janne Solala
Technology Solutions IT Infra and Administrative Information Systems Ticketing Systems Devices and Operating
Director of Department System Services Head of Group Head of Group Data Systems
Hannu Heikkinen Data Administration Manager Seppo Perkiö Kerkko Vanhanen Risto Vaattovaara Head of Group Krister Karppinen
Administrative and Strategic Financial Services Human Resources Office Services Legal Services
Services Financial Manager Human Resources Manager Office Manager Senior Lawyer Kaisa Mäkinen
Director of Department Ilmari Mäkinen Maarit Hauskamaa Eeva-Liisa Haaksluoto Heli Ruuska Lawyer Elisa Molin
Public transport purchaser-
provider model
Bus services
(Helb, Nobina, Veolia,
Pohjolan liikenne, Korsisaari,
Oy Andersson, Taksikuljetus,
Etelä-Suomen linjaliikenne,
Tammelundin liikenne, Metro Trams Commuter trains Ferry services
Åbergin linja) (HKL) (HKL) (VR) (HKL/SLL)
Raitiovaunut
(HKL)
Economic Outlook
HSL’s operating income 2015
Total €614.8m
Ticket
Other income 1.9 % Government subsidies for PT 1.0% revenue
Helsinki
internal
23.2%
Municipal Ticket revenue
contributions 48.5% Regional
48.6% tickets
18.2%
Extended regional tickets 2.7%
Espoo internal 2.4%
Vantaa internal 1.7%
Kirkkonummi internal 0.1%
Kerava-Sipoo internal 0.1%
Kutsuplus 0.1%
Kauniainen internal 0.02%HSL’s operating expenses 2015
Total €614.9m
Operating
Infra services 11.2% costs
Other purchases of services 4.6%
Personnel expenses 3.1%
Rents 0.6%
Bus
Other expenses 0.6% services
52.2%
Train
services
Operating costs 13.9%
79.9% Tram
services
8.4%
Metro services 4.3%
Ferry services 0.7%
Kutsuplus 0.4%Public Transport
FiguresHSL’s operating expenses 2015 Helsinki metropolitan area residents’ travel habits: number of journeys made and the share of public transport within the metropolitan area
Number of public tranpost
passengers 2013–2014, million
Boardings on public transport vehicles
Whole Share of
HSL 2014 HSL 2013 Finland 2013 HSL 2013
Buses 182.0 179.3 352.7 51 %
Metro 62.1 63.4 63.4 100 %
Trams 55.5 56.6 56.6 100 %
Commuter trains 51.9 50.3 69.3 73 %
Ferrie 1.8 1.8 1.8 100 %
Total 353.3 351.4 543.8 65 %
Source: Public Transport Performance Statistics 2013, Finnish Transport AgencyRoutes and number of services
2014
Weekdays
Routes Services
Bus 319 21,072
Metro 2 497
Trams 12 2,408
Trains 14 857
Ferry 2 72
Total 349 24,906Helsinki Region
Transport System
PlanningHelsinki Region Transport System Plan A long-term strategic plan. Aligns regional transport policy. A common view on the transport system development path and measures in the near future. Part of the land use, housing and transport (MAL) co-operation in the Helsinki region and of the MAL Letter of Intent preparation and monitoring process. Is based on the Regional Development Act and HSL’s Charter.
Helsinki Region
Transport System
(29%-63%)
(29%-63%)
2016
2012Helsinki Region Transport System Planning has been developed in stages
HLJ 2015 20 Esityksen nimi 29.8.2017
MAL-HLJ-interaction Implementation
- two processes hand in hand
MAL-
Impact assesment Intention
2016-2019
MASU
MASU-
Preparation of
the Land Use draft HLJ 2015
Plan MASU
and the
Housing
Strategy HLJ 2015 -
draft
Preparation of
the Helsinki Region
Transport System M = Land use
Plan A = Housing
HLJ 2015
L = Transport
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016The coherent urban
structure of the The dense core area is
metropolitan area surrounded by a network
combines multiple of district centers each
functions and is eco- with their own distinctive
Helsinki region is efficient. character and close-to-
developed as an nature environment.
attractive metropolitan
area functioning as an The transport system based
integrated whole. on sustainable modes of
transport serves the
The growing region accessibility of the region
offers a wide range of and the competitiveness of
housing options. industry and commerce.
MAL-VISION
(HSYK 26.11.2013 , HLJ Committee 31.1.2014)Transport goals (HLJ Committee 18 March 2014)
Accessibility – smoothness
Trip and transportation chains are seamless and reliable near and far.
The competitiveness of public transport improves.
Cycling is attractive and smooth.
Vehicular traffic journey times are predictable and congestion is in control.
Walking routes and environments are pedestrian-friendly.
Social, economic and ecological sustainability – responsibility
Travel is safe on all modes of transport.
There are alternatives for daily journeys meeting diverse user needs.
It is easy for people to choose healthy and responsible modes of transport.
Adverse environmental impacts and the environmental load of transport
are reduced.
The transport system is developed cost-effectivelyIn 2050, the Helsinki region is home to
every third Finn 2,000,000 network-like public
inhabitants transport
million
1,050,000 5.7 daily trips
a strong
metropolis
jobsHLJ 2015 policies show the way
Infrastructure development projects
Proposal for projects to be launched in 2015-2025
1a. Small cost-effective measures KUHA (continuous) *
*Projects named in the agreement signed
between the State and Helsinki region
1b. Helsinki downtown tram network (continuous)
municipalities to promote large infrastructure
2. Improvement of Keravantie (Road 148) (supp budget 2014)
projects and housing
3. Western additional track in Pasila (budget 2015)
4. Pasila–Riihimäki rail section, 1st phase (budget 2015) *
5. Metro Matinkylä – Kivenlahti + street and road arrangements *
6. Pisara Rail Loop (more detailed cost estimate on 15 Oct 2014) *
7. Klaukkala bypass, Road 132*
8. Hyrylä eastern bypass*
9. Improving the operation of the Helsinki rail yard (HELRA)
10. Development of the main road network monitoring and control system
11. Mid-sized road packages (competitiveness of public transport, vehicular traffic congestion
control)
12. Logistics link needed in Central Uusimaa, 1st phase
13. Espoo City Rail Link (Leppävaara-Espoon keskus)
14. Jokeri Light Rail
15. Ruskeasanta station
16. Ring Road I, 2nd phase
€375m/yearOther areas of development for the
municipalities 2016–2050 Land Use Zones The primary development
areas of the region 2016–2050
The development of areas outside the
regional zones which have a strategic The goal is to direct at least 80 % of
importance in the current plans of the new housing construction into these
municipalities areas
Areal development may not cause
significant regional investment needs or The complemental areas of the
hinder the development of the regional primary development areas in
scale at a later time
the region
2025–2050
Regional industrial, These areas become primary
logistical and development areas as the transport
warehouse centres network is complemented in
accordance with the HLJ 2015
Possible areas of expansion after
Areas outside the designated
2040
zones
Areas connected to large transport
investments and whose development
Areal development may not cause
significant regional investment needs or in a grand scale is in conjunction with
hinder the development of the regional the implementation of the possible
scale at a later time transport investments
31HLJ 2015 is good for the region
Public transport is
used more: its share Accessibility
of motorized trips of the region The per journey cost
increases by of public transport
6 percentage points. improves decreases.
significantly.
The capacity of main
roads is used almost
to the full but hardly An increasing number of people choose
ever exeeded.
public transport, cycling and walking.Significant environmental impacts
The climate target 2030 New land use is
for the metropolitan area located in noise
is achieved. zones.
The EU climate targets are not
achieved without significant
changes. Air quality may Quiet
deteriorate areas
locally. are not at risk.
Increase in vehicular traffic increases Conditions for a car-free
accidents but relative to population, lifestyle are created but car
accidents decrease. dependency continues to be a
challenge.Mid-Summary In the future the population of the region increases significantly. The functioning of the traffic system is ensured by: • intensifying land use in harmony with transport system. • examining vehicular traffic pricing as a means of directing mobility and funding transport system • improving the service level of public transport in the whole region. -> MAL-agreement between state and municipalities
MAL 2019
Towards next transport system plan Prepared together with regional housing and land use planning processes (MAL agreement) Key challenge is to decrease CO2 emissions (with economically viable solutions) • More compact cities • Bigger share of sustainable modes of transport • Technology will for sure help, but when and how? ”Realism and resilience”
Planning Organization
Municipalities
take part in transport
PREPARATION
Expert groups: Land Use Group Housing Group Transport Groups system planning and
Representatives are responsible for land
of municipalities, use and housing
HSL and the planning.
state Land Use, Housing and Transport (LHT) Project Group
HSL
is responsible for
preparing the transport
STEERING
Steering groups:
system plan (binded by
Leading authorities LHT Committee Transport System Committee law) and its impact
of municipalities
and the state assessment.
DECISION MAKING
The State
Helsinki Region General Meeting participates in planning
Decision makers: HSL Executive Board
Elected officials (HSYK) and is represented in
the Transport System
of municipalities
Keski-Uusimaa Region (KUUMA) Executive Board Committee and LHT
project group.Land Use, Housing and Transport
System Plan 2019
Political decision making
Integrated transport, land use and housing planning
”Framework”
Support studies
”Planning the plan”
Learning from the previous plan
• Concrete measures for the near • Impact assessment guides planning
future, flexibility in the long run • Milestones set the pace of planning and decision making
• Efficient use of existing data • Transparent, concise and efficient interactionPublic transport trunk routes
Population
2015 -> 2030
40 Esityksen nimi 29.8.2017Year 2030:
Density related to accessibility
Saavutettavuus ja tiheys laskettu ruuduittain asukasmääräpainotettuina persentiileinä ja niistä erotus: tuloksena erottuu ruudut, joissa muihin kehyskuntien
(vasen kuva) tai PKS:n (oikea kuva) asukkaisiin verrattuna hyvä saavutettavuus ja vähän maankäyttöä tai toisinpäin.Centers in Helsinki region v. 2015 ja 2050
Technology & services
PRIVATE AUTOMATED VEHICLES
SHARED AUTOMATED VEHICLES
AUTOMATED MINI BUSSES
AUTOMATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT VEHICLES
Sharing
INFORMATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
ALTERNATIVE FUELS
Automation
ELECTRIC AND CARGO BICYCLES
Information and traffic
NEW AVIATION VEHICLES
management system
ROAD FEES
DEMAND DRIVEN PUBLIC TRANSPORT Delivery services
CITY BIKES
SHARED VEHICLES
Alternative fuels
MAAS/TRAVEL CHAIN SERVICES
HOME DELIVERY SERVICES
43 MAL2019 - Liikenteen uudet palvelut ja teknologiat 29.8.2017Sharing rides
Division of trips The portion of shared
rides according to initial
trip plan
Henkilöautomatka
Private car (alone)yksin Substitued private
Korvautunut car trip
Henkilöautomatka
Julkinen liikenne
Public transport Substitued public
Korvautunut transport tripmatka
Julkisenliikenteen
Jaettu henkilöautomatka
Private car (shared)
Lähtevien ajoneuvomatkojen määrän alenema (ajon.matkaa/alue)
aamuhuipputunnilla 2030
44 MAL2019 - Liikenteen uudet palvelut ja teknologiat 29.8.2017Simulation of shared modes 45 MAL2019 - Liikenteen uudet palvelut ja teknologiat 29.8.2017
The role of public transport in the
revolution of urban transport
(according to UITP and the public transport authorities of large Nordic cities)
Cities are growing and excessive Efficient public transport trunk services are still
driving takes up space weakening the needed but increasing the share of public
quality of the living environment and transport through investments and subsidies is
threatening economic growth, getting more difficult and expensive
productivity and health
Data transmission, data, mobile
devices, social media, location More effective and optimal use of A more extensive array of
services, etc. create possibilities and existing space is necessary mobility services designed
bring new services to the market around efficient public
Increasing road and street capacity
transport is the answer to
As values and behavior change, the versatile, increasing
for driving is a bad alternative
citizens are looking for new means mobility needs of cities.
of mobility
Political will supports (even requires) reducing Pricing of transport is necessary to
emissions, better urban environment, healthy direct demand and modal choice
mobility choices, utilizing digitalization,
developing markets
46 29.8.2017Preliminary trends in the development of HSL’s
role in the field of mobility services
1 Ticketing cooperation 2Information and marketing cooperation 3 Services provided by HSL
1c. Public transport ticketing 2b. Other mobility service providers 3c. In certain areas of at certain times,
cooperation with authorities and are included in the Journey Planner public transport supply is
commercial actors is increased. replaced/piloted by other mobility
• Data interfaces available for everyone services, provided the service
• Ticketing interfaces in contractual in line with the Act on Transport Services
cooperation (independent of this) • Supplements HSL’s services
• HSL’s condition is the ownership of • Partners for more extensive cooperation • Creates a long-distance trip chain
customers and anonymous travel data are selected on the same basis as for • Contributes to sustainable mobility (car-free
of the users of HSL transport ticketing cooperation lifestyle) that does not unilaterally compete
services • Operative powers with public transport
• Selecting partners who implement • Does not increase car mileage, in particular
HSL’s strategic goals in areas with limited capacity
• Having only cooperation with benefits
to HSL’s goals and customers in 3a. HSL provides a mobility platform. HSL
proportion to the resources required plans and organizes a mobile ride-hailing and
• Common commercial and technical pooling service in its area
criteria for contract partners
• Operative powers
Transport system planning takes all mobility services comprehensively into account regardless of HSL’s role in their production
HSL is responsible for the preparation of the Helsinki Region Transport System
47 Plan (HLJ) in cooperation with strategic land use and housing planning.Planning Outcomes
Current situation and Goals
• Grounds for developing the Helsinki Region
2019 – 2030: Measures
• Investments in infrastructure and land use
development
• Other efficient measures
2031 – 2050: Scenarios
• Uncertainty increases in the long run, which
requires:
Examination of different scenarios and
development paths
Increased demand for flexibility in planning
Adapting to changes in operational environmentThank you
Head of Group Tapani Touru
Transport System and Research Department, Helsinki Region Transport
tapani.touru@hsl.fi
+358 40 504 2270You can also read
