LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION - (LSSIP) UKRAINE YEARS 2014 2018 - LEVEL
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE (Formally known as LCIP) Years 2014-2018 – Level 1
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LSSIP for Ukraine
Infocentre Reference: 14/01/07-41
Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013
LSSIP Year 2013 Ukraine Edition Date: 25/04/14
LSSIP Focal Point - Ruslan Hutsan E-mail: UkSATSE
rhutsan@uksatse.org.ua
LSSIP Contact Person – Ana Paula Frangolho E-mail: ana-paula. Unit DSS/EIPR
frangolho@eurocontrol.int
Status Intended for
Working Draft General Public
Draft Agency Stakeholders
Proposed Issue Restricted Audience
Released Issue
Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)
Path: X:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Ukraine (UA)\Year 2013\Released\LSSIP_2013_UA_Released.doc
LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
1. LSSIP Guidance Material: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material
2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2013: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
3. ESSIP Report 2012: www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
4. STATFOR Forecasts: www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
5. Acronyms and abbreviations: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
6. European ATM Master Plan: https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
7. LSSIP Documents: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
8. National AIP : http://www.aisukraine.net
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine Released Issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................. 16 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine ................................................................................................. 16 2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC ..................................................................................................... 17 2.3 KYIV ACC............................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 LVIV ACC ............................................................................................................................... 21 2.5 ODESA ACC .......................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 26 Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 28 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 36 5.1. Regional coordination .................................................................................................................. 36 5.1.2. International workshops ........................................................................................................... 36 5.1.3. Common Aviation Area Agreement .......................................................................................... 36 5.1.4. EU Twinning Project for Airports, Aerodromes and Air Navigation Service of Ukraine ........... 37 5.2. Regional cooperation................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.1. MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE ......................................................................................... 37 5.2.2. Project Management Plan for EUROCONTROL support......................................................... 38 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ........................................................................................ 39 ANNEXES LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine Released Issue
Executive Summary State Context The State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU) was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 - “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air Code of Ukraine and Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine №228 dated 21 March 2012 and became operational from 01 Feb 2013. Initialing of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013. Joint Statement on cooperation in the area of Satellite Based Augmentation Systems – EGNOS Extension to Ukraine was signed in Brussels on 27.11.2013 by Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine and Vice- President and Commissioner of EC. The implementation of the ESARRs is progressing well, although not yet completed. Complementary rules for ESARR 5 are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready in 2014. In accordance with the statement of Ukraine on the 36th Session of EUROCONTROL Provisional Council the RP1 should be considered as a transitional period for Ukraine, focusing on the monitoring of the Performance Indicators during RP1 with the intention of target setting in RP2. EUROCONTROL provided official deliverables of the Project Management Plan in the context of the “Agreement for EUROCONTROL support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” (see Chapter 5). A numbers of national projects are planned and regional international activities are in place (see Chapter 4 and 5). Ukraine is planning to establish Upper Information Region within Ukrainian airspace with vertical limits from FL 275 (included) to UNL. ESSIP Objective Implementation There are plans for completing objectives due for: ● 2014 - AOP03, FCM01, SAF10, SRC-SLRD; ● 2015 - AOM19, AOP04.1, AOP04.2, ATC16, COM09, COM10, FCM03, ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP, ITY-SPI. LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 1 Released Issue
* FOC Date
LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine █ Planned implementation date
(see legend at the bottom of the table)* FOC Date
LSSIP 2013 - Ukraine █ Planned implementation date
(see legend at the bottom of the table)
Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations
SAF10
caused by airspace infringements *
SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *
Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by
SRC-CHNG
National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) *
Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory
SRC-RLMK
Requirements (ESARRs) *
SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies *Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP
mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation
Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The
LSSIP document – Year 2014-2018 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2013.
The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s)
accountable for the information contained in each of them:
Chapters 1 to 5 present the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical
scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the
document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects
in which the national Stakeholders are involved.
Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The
information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress
and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the
beginning of the section.
Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document
consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains
all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder
Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 4 Released IssueChapter 1 - National ATM Environment
1.1 Geographical Scope
1.1.1 International Membership
Ukraine is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 15.12.1999
EUROCONTROL 01.05.2004
European Union No
European Common Aviation Area No *
EASA No**
ICAO 09.09.1992
NATO No
* Initiation of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member
states took place in Vilnius on 28 of November 2013.
** 1. Cooperation on the basis of Working Arrangements in the framework of the transition of the
Joint Aviation Authorities and on collection and exchange of information on the safety of aircraft
using community airports and airports of the relevant country (done at Brussels on 07 March
2007).
2. Working Arrangement between the SAAU and EASA (done at Paris 2009).
1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses Kyiv, Simferopol’, Dnipropetrovs’k, Odesa and L’viv
FIRs.
The Ukrainian ATS Airspace is surrounded by 10 FIRs of 9 different States namely, Minsk FIR (Belarus),
Moscow FIR and Rostov–na-Donu FIR (Russia), Ankara FIR (Turkey), Varna FIR (Bulgaria), Bucharest
FIR (Romania), Chisinau FIR (Moldova), Budapest FIR (Hungary), Bratislava FIR (Slovak Republic) and
Warszawa FIR (Poland). Two of the surrounding States, Russia and Belarus, are non-ECAC States.
The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 275.
Ukraine is planning to establish Upper Information Region within Ukrainian airspace with vertical limits
from FL 275 (included) to UNL.
The lateral boundaries of 5 existing FIRs of Ukraine are retained in the published boundaries in
accordance with International Agreements and current edition of ICAO European Air Navigation Plan
(ICAO Doc 7754) with vertical limits from ground to FL 275 (not included).
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 5 Released Issue1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation The current classification of the airspace in Ukraine is shown in the following picture: LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 6 Released Issue
Note: Airspace P, R, D, T – areas, TSA/TRA, CBA, CTR and TMA of military aerodromes of Ukraine is
not classified according to ICAO SARPs.
Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the high seas where the air traffic services are delegated to Ukraine
by international agreements, consists of the following structural elements:
5 Flight Information Regions (Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, Kyiv FIR, L’viv FIR, Odesa FIR and
Simferopol’ FIR);
23 CTA Sectors;
23 TMAs which include 3 military TMAs;
46 Control Zones (CTRs) which include 20 military CTRs;
5 Aerodrome Flight Information Zones (AFIZs);
Aerodrome Traffic Zones (ATZs) – usually set up for each touchdown pad;
115 ATS routes and routes set up for crossing the state border of Ukraine.;
33 Prohibited Areas;
207 Restricted Areas;
76 Danger Areas;
192 Training Areas, 62of them are stated as temporary airspace reservation;
Special rules zone airspace – set up along the state border.
1.2 National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Ukraine are the following:
- Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine
- Ministry of Defence of Ukraine
- The Regulator, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU);
- The ATM Service Provider, UkSATSE.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the following
diagram:
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 7 Released Issue1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)
1.2.1.1 General information
The SAAU was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011
- “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The SAAU is a separate and independent
regulatory body. Activity of the SAAU is controlled and directed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
through the Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.
The SAAU is institutionally separated from the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE).
The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table
below. The SAAU is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation Legal Basis
responsible
Rule-making MoI, SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI
dated 19/05/2011 , Decrees of the President of
Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute
of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and
N581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry
of Infrastructure of Ukraine", Decree of the Cabinet
of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002
“Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”
The aviation related regulatory acts are developed by
the SAAU and approved at the level of MoI.
Safety Oversight SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011
dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation
Administration of Ukraine”,
Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight
in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010
Manual of Integrated management System of
UkSATSE” approved by UkSATSE and agreed by
SAA 25.12.2012.
Establishment of Tolerable SAAU Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight
Safety Levels in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010
Safety Performance Monitoring SAAU "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic
Management" dated 31/05/2010 № 320
Enforcement actions in case of SAAU “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers
non-compliance with safety Certification’ approved by Order of the Ministry of
regulatory requirements Transport and Communications of Ukraine №42
dated 22/01/2007
Airspace SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI
dated 19/05/2011, Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers
of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on
Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”.
Economic MoI Decree of the President of Ukraine № 581/2011
dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of
Infrastructure of Ukraine".
Environment SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011
dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State
Aviation Administration of Ukraine”
Security SAAU Low of Ukraine N545-IV dated 20/02/2003
"The State Security Programme in areas of Civil
Aviation",
Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011
dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State
Aviation Administration of Ukraine”
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 8 Released IssueAlthough Single European Sky (SES) is not applicable to Ukraine (see also Chapter 2), ANSP certification
is carried out in accordance with “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification” approved
by the order of the MoT № 42 dated 22/01/2007 (with amendments for requirements to ANSPs that
provide MET services (order of MoI N575 dated on 28.11.2011) that was developed in line with the EC
Regulation 1035/2011.
Website of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (MoTC): http://www.mtu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian
language).
Website of State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU): www.avia.gov.ua (in Ukrainian, Russian
languages).
Website of Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE): http://www.uksatse.ua/
(in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages).
1.2.1.2 State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU)
The Regulatory Body in the field of Civil Aviation in Ukraine is the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine
(SAAU), established by the Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011
It is a separate and independent regulatory body. It is institutionally separated from the ANSP.
The SAAU is composed of civil representatives only, but appropriate Military Authorities (MoD) are
involved in the airspace planning process in accordance with the "Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of
Ukraine". The SAAU is responsible for the provision of effective functioning of the Integrated Civil-Military
ATM System of Ukraine.
The structure of the SAAU and UkSATSE are shown in Annex B.
Annual Report published: The Annual Safety Report for 2011 was published in Feb 2012 (N 19.2.11-
2a).
The Safety Report for 9 months of 2012 was published on 20.10.201
19.2.11-11A
The Annual Safety Report for 2012 was drafted and will be published not
later than 20/02/2012.
1.2.2 UkSATSE
Name of the ANSP: Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE)
Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en-route Y See section 2.3.
SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on
27.12.2011 according to national legislation.
ATC approach Y See comment above.
ATC Airport(s) Y See comments above.
AIS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on
27.12.2011 according to national legislation.
AFIS Y See comments above.
CNS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on
27.12.2011 according to national legislation.
MET Y Certified by SAAU for en-route meteorological service. SAAU certified
UkSATSE in June 2012 for en-route meteorological service.
Meteorological service at airports is provided by the State Hydro -
meteorological Service of Ministry of Emergency Situations.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 9 Released IssueATCO training Y Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE provides: initial training; unit
training; continuation training (conversion training, training for unusual
circumstances and emergencies, refresher training, language training);
development training.
Others Y Flight Calibration Service.
Additional information:
Provision of services in Y 1. Part of the airspace of the Black Sea for which the provision of ATS is
other State(s): delegated to Ukraine according to international agreements.
2. In order to facilitate Approach Control Services for Uzhhorod Airport
located close to the State Border, Air traffic services are delegated to
Uzhhorod APP within part of airspace (Prohibited Area) of the Slovak
Republic.
1.2.2.1 ATC system in use
Supplier and
Location Scope Type Put in Ops
Product
Aerotechnica Ltd,
Simferopol’ Ukraine, APP, TWR 2007
“Victoriya”
INDRA, Spain,
Simferopol’ APP, TWR (Back-Up) SEP2014
AIRCON 2100
Aerotechnica Ltd,
Lviv Ukraine, ACC, APP, TWR 2001
“Kseniya”
Aerotechnica Ltd,
Lviv,
Ukraine, ACC, APP, TWR SEP2014
(replacement)
“Roksolana”
Aerotechnica Ltd,
Odesa Ukraine, ACC, APP, TWR Systems and 2003
“Anastasiya-II” procedures for air
Odesa, INDRA, Spain, traffic services, in
ACC, APP, TWR DEC2015
(replacement) “AIRCON 2100” particular flight data
SELEX, Italy, processing systems,
Kiev ACC, APP & TWR FEB2012
“Strela – Alenia” surveillance data
ALES, processing systems
Kiev Chez Republic, ACC, APP (Back-Up) and human-machine OCT2012
“Letvis” interface systems
INDRA, Spain,
Dnipropetrovs’k ACC, APP, TWR 2008
“AIRCON 2000”
Dnipropetrovs’k,
(upgrading to INDRA, Spain,
ACC, APP, TWR FEB 2014
provide back-up “AIRCON 2100”
facilities)
INDRA, Spain,
Donets’k APP, TWR MAY 2012
“AIRCON 2100”
INDRA, Spain,
Kharkiv APP, TWR AUG 2013
“AIRCON 2100”
Aerotechnica Ltd,
Zaporizhzhya Ukraine, TWR 2006
“Irina”
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 10 Released Issue1.2.2.2. ATC units of UkSATSE
The following table lists the ACCs and APPs (with associated FIRs) in the Ukrainian ATS airspace,
including the airspace where the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine.
ATC Unit Number of Associated FIR(s) Remarks
sectors
En- TMA
route
Kyiv ACC 7 5 UKBV Kyiv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL
within Kyiv FIR
Odesa ACC 5 2 UKOV Odesa FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL
within Odesa FIR
L’viv ACC 4 1 UKLV L’viv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL
within L’viv FIR
Dnipropetrovs’k ACC 6 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL
within south-west of Dnipropetrovs’k
FIR, from FL265 to UNL north and
south-east part of Dnipropetrovs’k
FIR from FL265 to UNL
Kharkiv APP 3 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265
within TMA
Donets’k APP 2 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265
within TMA
Luhans’k APP+TWR 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Ivano-Frankivs’k 1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
APP+TWR
Uzhhorod APP+TWR 1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+PAR+TWR service
Zaporizhzhia 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
APP+TWR
Chernivtsi TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
Dnipropetrovs’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service
Donets’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service
Kharkiv TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service
Kryvyi Rih TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Kyiv/Boryspil’ TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service
Kyiv/Zhuliany TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service
L’viv TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR TWR service
Mariupol’ TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Mykolaiv TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR APP+TWR service
Odesa TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service
Rivne TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service
Simferopol’ TWR 2 UKFV Simferopol’ FIR TWR service
Vinnytsia/Gavrishivka X UKBV Kyiv FIR APP+TWR service
TWR
Kirovohrad TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Poltava TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
Sumy TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 11 Released Issue1.2.2.3. Air traffic control service
4 ACCs (Kyiv, L’viv, Odesa and Dnipropetrovs’k) provide area and approach control services, flight
information and alerting services within CTAs.
6 APPs (Donetsk, Kharkiv, Luhans’k, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia and Uzhhorod) provide approach
control service within TMAs.
21 TWRs provide aerodrome control service in civil aerodromes Chernivtsi, Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k,
Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kharkiv, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Luhans’k,
Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Rivne, Simferopol’, Sumy, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia and within its
CTRs.
1.2.2.4. Flight information service
Flight information sectors of ACCs/APPs provide flight information service within FIRs.
Flight information service (FIS) is provided:
within controlled airspace (class C, D) – by ATC units (ACCs/APPs/TWRs);
outside controlled airspace (class G, GND-1500 AMSL) - by 7 flight information sectors which are
in 4 ACCs (Kyiv – 2 sectors, L’viv – 2 sectors, 1 sector, Odesa – 1 sector, Dnipropetrovs’k – 1
sector) and by 2 flight information sectors are situated in APP units (Donets’k – 1 sector, Kharkiv -
1 sector).
1.2.2.5. Aerodrome flight information service
5 AFIS units provide flight information service in AFIS aerodromes: Zhytomyr (Ozerne), Ternopil’,
Kherson, Kaniv (Pekari) and Cherkasy.
1.2.2.6. Alerting Service
All ATS units are responsible to provide alerting service within its area of responsibility according to
Ukrainian legislation.
ACCs serve as the central point for collecting all information relevant to a state of emergency of an
aircraft operating within the flight information region or control area concerned and for forwarding such
information to appropriate regional Search and Rescue Co-ordination Centers of the Ministry of
Emergencies of Ukraine that are situated in each ACCs.
In case of emergency in civil aerodromes concerned TWR informs appropriate service set up within the
framework of the search and rescue units and other services and units specified in the related
coordination instructions.
To collect and share ATS messages, there are:
13 Air Traffic Service Reporting Offices (AROs) at airports: Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivs’k,
Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Luhans’k, Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Rivne, Sumy, Uzhhorod, Vinnytsia
and Zaporizhzhia;
8 AROs, which belong to briefing offices: Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k, Kyiv (Boryspil’),
Kyiv(Zhuliany), L’viv, Odesa, Simferopol’ and Kharkiv.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 12 Released Issue1.2.3. Airports
1.2.3.1. General information
The airport network in Ukraine comprises 35 certified aerodromes of which 25 have international
checkpoints.
Kyiv Boryspil International Airport, the only airport covered in this LSSIP edition, is the main international
airport in Ukraine and accounts for over 45% of all IFR operations at Ukrainian airports/aerodromes.
Aerodromes Simferopol’, Odesa, Kyiv Zhuliany, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs’k, and L’viv are
strategic. Other aerodromes are domestic. In accordance with international standards, the service zone of
strategic aerodromes is within 200-250km.
The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.
1.2.3.2. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
The airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.
1.2.4. Military Authorities
The Military Authorities (the Ministry of Defence) in Ukraine are composed of:
- The General Staff;
- The Armed Forces (Air Force, Ground Force and Naval).
The main responsibilities of the Air Force are:
- Air defence of airspace of Ukraine;
- Monitoring of airspace usage;
- Air Traffic Control within unclassified airspace (TSA, TRA, R, D-zone, CTR and TMA of
military aerodromes).
Air traffic control to OAT is ensured by a network of controlling military units that are responsible for
providing services to OAT, planning and co-ordination the use of airspace with respective bodies of the
Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.
The controlling military units are a part of a common combat system of operation of the Armed Forces.
The controlling military units are provided OAT services in accordance with specific rules and procedures.
They report to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
1.2.4.1. Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military N/A
by national legal provisions? governed by national legal provisions?
Level of such legal provision: State Law, Ministerial Level of such legal provision: N/A
Decree, Air Force Regulation
Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, Authority signing such legal provision: N/A
Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A
OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination N/A
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N/A
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N/A
ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 13 Released IssueANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N/A
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A
Aircrew Licensing Y
Additional Information: OAT provided by Military ATC Additional Information: Military ATC units do not provide
units services to GAT
Means used to inform airspace users (other than Means used to inform airspace users (other than
military) about these provisions: military) about these provisions:
National AIP Y National AIP N/A
National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A
Other: N/A Other: N/A
Oversight
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: General Staff NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services
provided by the military: N/A
Additional information: Additional information: GAT is provided by respective
ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM
System.
1.2.4.2. Service Provision role
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En-Route N En-Route N
Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA N
Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND N
AIS Y AIS N
MET Y MET N
SAR Y SAR N
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N
Other: Other:
Additional Information: Additional Information:
Military ANSP providing GAT N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the N/A
services SES certified? Certificate:
Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in N/A
accordance with SES regulations?
Additional Information:
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 14 Released Issue1.2.4.3. User role
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
can fly?
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Within specific corridors only Y
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Mode S ACAS Y
Others: Some transport state aircraft are approved for flight in RVSM airspace.
1.2.4.4. Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Military in applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
Remark: FUA requirements at the Levels 2 and 3 are implemented by the military in the framework of the
Integrated civil-military ATM system of Ukraine.
1.2.5. Accident/incident Investigation Body
1.2.5.1. Technical investigations
The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air
Code of Ukraine and of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Regulation №228 dated 21 March 2012. The
National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft and became operational from 01 Feb 2013.
1.2.5.2. Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data
In order to carry out this function, appropriate software tools are under development by the SAAU.
1.2.5.3. Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents
The investigations of accidents/incidents with civil aircrafts are provided by the State Independent
Investigation Board.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 15 Released IssueChapter 2 - En-route Traffic and Capacity
2.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine
Ukraine - Annual IFR Movements
800000 Ukraine - Distribution (Ref. year 2012)
700000
600000
Overflights
500000 62%
IFR flights
400000
300000 IFR movements - Actuals
Domestic International
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
flights 8% Dep/Arr
200000 31%
IFR movements - High forecast
100000 IFR movements - Low forecast
0
2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F
A = Actual
F = Forecast
STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (September 2013)
IFR flights yearly growth 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F
H 8,0% 8,3% 6,2% 6,1% 5,6% 5,9% 5,7%
Ukraine B 13,7% 5,5% 2,9% 7,6% 6,4% 4,3% 4,6% 4,0% 4,3% 4,2%
L 7,1% 4,6% 2,6% 3,2% 2,7% 2,8% 2,7%
ESRA B 0,8% 3,1% -2,4% -0,9% 1,4% 2,6% 2,7% 2,2% 2,5% 2,5%
2013
Traffic in the Ukraine increased by 7.0% during summer 2013 (May to October inclusive), when
compared to summer 2012.
2014-2018/19
The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 3.1% and
6.3% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 16 Released Issue2.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19
UKDVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
800 1.0
0.9
700
Enroute Delay (minutes per flight)
0.8
IFR flights (Daily Average)
600
0.7
500
0.6
400 0.5
0.4
300
0.3
200
0.2
100
0.1
0 0.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 533 527 577 703 645
Summer Traffic 382 443 488 522 540
Yearly Traffic 337 382 422 446 465
Summer Traffic Forecast 557 584 613 638 668 698
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 567 602 640 681 718 757
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 552 565 585 604 622 640
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2.2.2 Summer 2013 performance
En-route Delay (min/flight)
Capacity
Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline
Optimum All reasons Without weather gap
+3.5% 49 (+0%) 0.1-0.2 0.0 0.0 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2012.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01
Yes
and FCM03 objectives
Modernization and installation of ATM systems in UKDV ACC
(July 2013) and UKHH APP (training and transition periods – Yes
from March to May 2013) correspondently
Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures
No
according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM)
Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development
Yes
(strategic ATFCM)
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes
Summer 2013 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 39
flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The
peak 3 hour demand was 34.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 17 Released Issue2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a
capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the
following parameters:
2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January
2011
2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5
min/flight
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values
UKDVCTA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Annual 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Summer 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Capacity Profiles
2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ACC
baseline 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
H 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 51 2% 53 4%
Ref. 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 50 0%
UKDV 49
L 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0%
C/R 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2% 51 2%
Capacity Plan
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Free Route
Implementation of Airspace
FCM01 and Implementation
FCM03 objectives (FRAU Ukraine,
Step 1 – Night)
Measures planned ATFCM training
Implementation of Short Term
of ATCO/FMP
ATFCM Measures (STAM)
personnel at
procedures
EUROCONTROL
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Significant events
Max sectors 6 6 6 6 6 6
Capacity increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Additional information
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 18 Released IssueUKDVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
55
50
Capacity profile (movements per hour)
45
40
35
30
25
20
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 49 49 49 49 50 50
Capacity Profile - Current Routes 49 49 49 49 50 51
Capacity Profile - High 49 49 49 50 51 53
Capacity Profile - Low 49 49 49 49 49 49
Capacity Baseline 49 49
2014 - 2019 Plan 49 49 49 50 51 53
2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for Dnipropetrovs’k ACC during the current planning cycle
2.3 KYIV ACC
2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19
UKBVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
1400 1.0
0.9
Enroute Delay (minutes per flight)
1200
0.8
IFR flights (Daily Average)
1000 0.7
0.6
800
0.5
600
0.4
400 0.3
0.2
200
0.1
0 0.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 721 789 876 1099 1004
Summer Traffic 549 630 713 754 783
Yearly Traffic 498 549 626 650 661
Summer Traffic Forecast 814 857 905 945 984 1025
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 829 891 953 1014 1080 1144
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 799 821 854 881 913 940
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 19 Released Issue2.3.2 Summer 2013 performance
En-route Delay (min/flight)
Capacity
Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline
Optimum All reasons Without weather gap
+3.9% 72 (0%) 0.1 – 0.2 0.0 0.0 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2012.
Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM
measures according to traffic demand (pre tactical and Yes
tactical ATFCM)
Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures
Yes
development (strategic ATFCM)
ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP
Yes
FCM01, FCM03 and AOP05 objectives
Maximum configuration: 7 sectors No Maximum configuration: 6 sectors
Summer 2013 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 59
flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The
peak 3 hour demand was 51 flights.
2.3.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a
capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the
following parameters:
2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January
2011
2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5
min/flight
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values
UKBVCTA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Annual 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
Summer 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01
Capacity Profiles
2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ACC
baseline 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
H 72 0% 72 0% 74 3% 78 5% 81 4% 87 7%
Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 73 1% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3%
UKBV 72
L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 73 1%
C/R 72 0% 72 0% 73 1% 74 1% 76 3% 78 3%
Capacity Plan
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Implementation
Implementation of Short Term
of FCM01 and
ATFCM Measures (STAM)
Measures FCM03
procedures
planned objectives
Free Route
ATFCM training
Airspace
of ATCO/FMP
Implementation
personnel at
(FRAU Ukraine,
EUROCONTROL
Step 1 – Night)
Significant
events
Max sectors 7 7 7 7 7 7
Capacity
Sufficient capacity to meet demand
increase
Reference
0% 0% 1% 1% 3% 3%
profile
Additional
information
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 20 Released IssueUKBVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
100
90
80
Capacity profile (movements per hour)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 72 72 73 74 76 78
Capacity Profile - Current Routes 72 72 73 74 76 78
Capacity Profile - High 72 72 74 78 81 87
Capacity Profile - Low 72 72 72 72 72 73
Capacity Baseline 72 72
2014 - 2019 Plan 72 72 74 78 81 87
2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for Kyiv ACC during the current planning cycle.
2.4 LVIV ACC
2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19
UKLVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
900 1.0
800 0.9
Enroute Delay (minutes per flight)
0.8
IFR flights (Daily Average)
700
0.7
600
0.6
500
0.5
400
0.4
300
0.3
200
0.2
100 0.1
0 0.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 616 644 721 757 796
Summer Traffic 461 514 546 554 574
Yearly Traffic 419 451 486 488 498
Summer Traffic Forecast 594 615 641 661 682 711
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 600 634 669 705 742 780
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 581 591 607 618 635 650
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 21 Released Issue2.4.2 Summer 2013 performance
En-route Delay (min/flight)
Capacity
Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline
Optimum All reasons Without weather gap
+3.6% 72 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2012.
Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures
Yes
according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM)
Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development
Yes
(strategic ATFCM)
Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods –
Yes
from August to October 2013
ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01
Yes
and FCM03 objectives
Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes
Summer 2013 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 47
flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The
peak 3 hour demand was 43 flights.
2.4.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a
capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the
following parameters:
2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January
2011
2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5
min/flight
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values
UKLVCTA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Annual 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Summer 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Capacity Profiles
2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ACC
baseline 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
UKLV 72
L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%
C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 73 1%
Capacity Plan
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
ATFCM training of
Implementation of Short Term
ATCO/FMP
ATFCM Measures (STAM)
personnel at
procedures
EUROCONTROL
Free Route
Measures Implementation of Airspace
planned FCM01 and FCM03 Implementation
objectives (FRAU Ukraine,
Step 1 – Night)
Installation of new
ATM system
(training and
transition periods –
from August to
November 2014)
Max sectors 4 4 4 4 4 4
Capacity
Sufficient capacity to meet demand
increase
Reference
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
profile
Additional
information
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 22 Released IssueUKLVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
75
70
Capacity profile (movements per hour) 65
60
55
50
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 72 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile - Current Routes 72 72 72 72 72 73
Capacity Profile - High 72 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Profile - Low 72 72 72 72 72 72
Capacity Baseline 72 72
2014 - 2019 Plan 72 72 72 72 72 72
2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for Lviv ACC during the current planning cycle.
2.5 ODESA ACC
2.5.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2009-2018/19
UKOVCTA - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
600 1.0
0.9
Enroute Delay (minutes per flight)
500
0.8
IFR flights (Daily Average)
0.7
400
0.6
300 0.5
0.4
200
0.3
0.2
100
0.1
0 0.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Peak Day Traffic 329 416 450 480 543
Summer Traffic 247 307 324 332 387
Yearly Traffic 208 250 266 272 302
Summer Traffic Forecast 402 422 448 464 487 511
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 410 439 471 499 527 563
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 394 407 424 435 449 461
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 23 Released Issue2.5.2 Summer 2013 performance
En-route Delay (min/flight)
Capacity
Traffic Evolution 2013 Capacity Baseline
Optimum All reasons Without weather gap
+ 16.7% 59 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No
Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2012.
Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures
Yes
according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM)
Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development
Yes
(strategic ATFCM)
ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01
Yes
and FCM03 objectives
Implementation of P-RNAV in TMA Yes
Maximum configuration: 3 sectors Yes
Summer 2013 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2012. The peak 1 hour demand was 33
flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The
peak 3 hour demand was 29 flights.
2.5.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a
capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
The 2014-2018/19 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the
following parameters:
2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC as provided in January
2011
2015-2018/19: Reference value based on the breakdown of a yearly European delay target of 0.5
min/flight
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 24 Released IssueEn-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values
UKOVCTA 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Annual 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Summer 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Capacity Profiles
2013 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ACC
baseline 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
H 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%
Ref. 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%
UKOV 59
L 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%
C/R 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%
Capacity Plan
Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sector configurations management, ATFCM measures development
Implementation
of FCM01 and Implementation of Short Term ATFCM
FCM03 Measures (STAM) procedures
objectives
ATFCM training
Measures
of ATCO/FMP
planned Installation of new ATM system
personnel at
EUROCONTROL
Free Route
Airspace
Implementation
(FRAU Ukraine,
Step 1 – Night)
Significant
events
Max sectors 5 5 5 5 5 5
Capacity
Sufficient capacity to meet demand
increase
Reference
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
profile
Additional
information
UKOVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
70
60
Capacity profile (movements per hour)
50
40
30
20
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2014-2019 Reference Capacity Profile 59 59 59 59 59 59
Capacity Profile - Current Routes 59 59 59 59 59 59
Capacity Profile - High 59 59 59 59 59 59
Capacity Profile - Low 59 59 59 59 59 59
Capacity Baseline 59 59
2014 - 2019 Plan 59 59 59 59 59 59
2014-2018/19 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for Odesa ACC during the current planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 25 Released IssueChapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations
Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2012 applicable to Ukraine for all items that require
corrective actions and improvements.
Number Recommendation Ownership
To ensure that all Stakeholders report the expected completion
dates as defined in their National business plans.
REC-2012-03 All States
Reply: Actions of the Business Plan of UkSATSE have links with
SLoAs of LSSIP objectives.
To ensure correct application of LSSIP guidance material and to
REC-2012-05 All States
implement the results of mandatory LSSIP in-cycle check.
To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the
implementation of basic ATSMHS capability (ESSIP objective
COM10). AL, AM, AZ, CY, CZ, DK,
EE, FI, FR, GR, HR, HU, IT,
REC-2012-10 Reply: The contract for AMHS system installation is in progress. LU, MAS, MD, MT, NO, SE,
FAT has been successfully completed in November 2013 and SI, UA
the delivery of equipment is expected on the beginning of 2014.
States to ensure that appropriate actions are taken for
overcoming present delays in the implementation of priority BE, UK, SE, NO, FI, LV, PL,
capabilities specified in the ESSIP objective FCM03. HU, UA, AM, TR, MK, FR,
REC-2012-11 PT, MT, RO, HR, BA, AL,
Reply: Appropriate actions are planned in line with ESSIP.
FCM03-ASP03 has links with COM10 and will be completed SI, IT, CZ, MAS, CY.
when COM10 is completed.
To ensure actions for overcoming present delays in the
implementation of remaining SLoAs for implementation of P- AL, AZ, BA, BE, BG, CY,
REC-2012-15 RNAV (ESSIP objective NAV03).
DE, EE, ES, GE, GR, HR,
HU, IT, LV, ME, MT, NO,
Reply: ESSIP objective is completed. PT, RS, SI, UA, UK
Interim Deployment Programme View
Number Recommendation Ownership
States are encouraged to speed up the AFP implementation
and to schedule AFP testing with Network Manager
Reply:
FCM01 implementation:
- Transportation clearance of ETFMS equipment Entry Nodes
(COMSOFT), ATM system modernization in Dnipropetrovs’k
ACC, Installation of ATM system in Lviv ACC are the delay
contributors.
- FCM01 is implemented for Kyiv ACC .
- FCM01 Implementation for Odessa, and Dnipropetrovs’k ACCs
REC-2012-22 - 02/2014 All States
- FCM01 implementation in Lviv ACC will be completed after
Installation of ATM system (12/2014
Implementation of the AFP refers to FCM03.
All UkSATSE ATM systems process AFP in ICAO format.
UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP
format as soon as Objective COM10 .
Related AFP testing was successfully completed in all
ACC/APP, except of Lviv ACC, where ATM system is expected
to be installed by the end of year 2014.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 26 Released IssueANSPs to increase activities towards the migration to IP.
Reply:
The infrastructure for IP connection between centres is
available.
The migration is in progress. Kyiv ATC centre is ready to
support FMTP and IP connection. NO, FI, IE, FR, ES, IT, HR,
REC-2012-31 HU, UA, RS, ME, MK, GR,
Other ATC centers are under upgrading (Dnipropetrovsk, MT, CY, AZ, SE
Donetsk, Kharkiv, L’viv will be completed within 2 quarter 2014,
Odesa ATC centre will be replaced with IP connection
possibility within 2014-2015).
The testing of FMTP connection between Kyiv ATC centre and
Chisinau ATC centre is in progress.
Stakeholders View
Number Recommendation Ownership
ANSPs are encouraged to publish more APV routes.
REC-2012-40 Reply: Appropriate actions are planned in line with ESSIP All ECAC ANSPs
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 27 Released IssueChapter 4 - National Projects
Name Schedule Description – Scope Status Link with Expected Contribution to the Key
European Master Performance Areas1
Plan.
BTN 2012/2016 Development (upgrade) of the fixed ground Project is in progress COM 09 Safety and Capacity
communication infrastructure of UkSATSE’s COM 10 Extension of BTN shall provide the
Backbone Telecommunication Network (BTN). The COM 11 possibility to exchange any type of ATC
aim of development is to extend existing oriented information (data/voice) between
infrastructure (6 main nodes) to 23 regional units all any application within UkSATSE all over
over Ukraine Ukraine
Mode S 2011/2013 5 new stand-alone Mode S MSSRs are planned to Project is completed ITY-SPI Safety and Capacity
MSSRs be installed in addition to 5 existing Mode S All radars are Implementation of Mode S (ELS) allows to
MSSRs, in order to provide Mode S duplicated implemented improve air situation awareness and to
coverage. increase the responsiveness to air
situation changes by:
- receiving of an aircraft identification
directly from aircraft
- increasing of flight level data reliability
- increasing of air conflict data reliability
- increasing of radar tracking quality
USENET 2012/2015 6 nodes of USENET are planned to be installed in Development of Technical SUR03 Safety, Capacity, Cost-efficiency
UkSATSE’s Regional Branches: Requirements is Network shall provide a single ground
- Dnipropetrоvs’k completed. transport environment between any
- Donets’k Project is in progress. resources and users, who are a part of the
- Kyiv Surveillance System of Ukraine (SSU),
and also between them and other
- L’viv authorised civil and military stakeholders
- Odesa on the territory of Ukraine.
1
Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 28 Released IssueATC centres 2010/ 2015 The upgrade of 5 ATC systems for L’viv Project is in progress Safety and Capacity
ACC/APP/TWR, Kharkiv APP/TWR, ATC systems in Kharkiv ATC02.2 The upgrade of ATC centres will allow to:
Dnipropetrovs’k ACC/APP/TWR, Odesa, and Dnipropetrovs’k have ATC02.6 - improve the reliability of ATM System
ACC/APP/TWR and Simferopol ACC/APP, consists been implemented. ATC02.5 operation by using modern computer and
on changing obsolete equipment to new one with Planned dates for ATC telecommunication technologies;
extended functionality. ENV01
systems upgrade - implement system functionality
completion: NAV03 according to the EUROCONTROL and
Remove sectors 1, 2 of Simferopol ACC to Lviv - 2014 UkSATSE requirements to ATM System;
AOM20
Dnipropetrovs’k ACC and sectors 3 ,4 ,5 of Odesa - 2015 - improve the capacity and air traffic
Simferopol ACC to Odesa ACC for the period of safety in the area of UkSATSE`s
upgrading. responsibility
Registration 2014/ 2016 Implementation of uniform video and audio It is expected that a Call Safety
facilities registration and playback facilities in ATC units of for Tender (CfT) The goal of this project is to improve the
UkSATSE procedure will be initiated reliability and objectivity of the recorded
in 2014 information about controllers actions
during the ATC.
ATC simulator 2014/ 2015 Implementation of ATC simulator for Kyiv ATC It is expected that a Call SAF04 Safety
center. for Tender (CfT) SAF05 The goal of this project is to improve the
procedure will be initiated SAF10 operative training of controllers who
in 2014 provide the ATS for most loaded area in
HUM02.1
Ukraine and increase the quality of
service and safety of flights in the area of
responsibility.
TOWER 2010/2017 Construction of new 3 Towers at civil aerodromes of Kharkiv TWR is AOP03 Safety and Capacity
Ukraine: Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs'k and Kyiv implemented The construction of new Towers and
(Boryspil’). Project is in progress. procurement of new modular Tower will
allow tore-equip them with new modern
CNS aids in accordance with the
EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR
ATC units. The result of this activity will
increase equipment reliability and
maintainability and consequently – safety
and capacity of air traffic.
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 29 Released IssueMODULAR 2013/2014 Procurement of new modular Tower for civil Project is in progress AOP03 Safety and Capacity
TOWER aerodrome in Kirovohrad The procurement of new 7 modular
Towers will allow tore-equip them with
new modern CNS aids in accordance with
EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR
ATC units. Outcomes of this activity will
be increase equipment reliability,
maintainability and consequently – safety
and capacity of air traffic.
SMR 2012/2016 Installation of 7 Surface Movement Radars (SMR) Project is in progress АОР04.2 Safety and Capacity
for main Ukrainian civil aerodromes: 2 SMRs for Implementation of SMRs will allow to
Kyiv (Boryspil’) and 1 for: Donets’k, , Kharkiv, improve the manoeuvring area awareness
Odesa, L’viv and Dnipropetrovs’k and to increase the responsiveness to
ground situation changes in the absence
of visual observation of all or part of the
manoeuvring area due to:
- providing radar monitoring of traffic on
the manoeuvring area;
- providing directional information to pilots
and vehicle drivers as necessary;
- providing advice and assistance for the
safe and efficient movement of aircraft
and vehicles on the manoeuvring area.
SOFTWARE 2014/2015 Procurement of instrument procedure design Project will start at the NAV03 Safety and Cost-efficiency
TOOL software tool to improve quality assurance in beginning of 2014. Improvement of safety due to
accordance with ICAO 9906 – “Quality Assurance improvement in procedures design and
Manual for Flight Procedure Design” cost effectiveness due to automation in
the overall process.
Upgrade of 2011/2014 2 new terminal radars (PSR/MSSR Mode S) are Radar in Donetsk and ITY-SPI Safety and Capacity
Terminal planned to be installed in 2014 . Kharkiv will be Implementation of the project allows to
Radars implemented in 2014 improve the quality of air situation
awareness and surveillance quality
(double coverage)
LSSIP Year 2014-2018 Ukraine 30 Released IssueYou can also read
