Moving From Paper to Electronic - Why governments need to get serious about electronic payment solutions.

Page created by Marion Bradley
 
CONTINUE READING
Bank of America Merrill Lynch White Paper

Moving From Paper                                                                         May 2014

to Electronic
Why governments need to get serious about
electronic payment solutions.

Executive summary                                                                         Contents

                                                                                          Purchasing cards continue
With the impact of the recession still lingering, state and local governments are under
                                                                                          growth path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
immense pressure to cut costs. While some states and cities have been cutting services
                                                                                          Accounts payable
and eliminating personnel to balance their budgets, others are finding opportunity for    goes digital. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

savings through less drastic — but still extremely effective — measures. Specifically,
                                                                                          Fuller solutions generate
they are making changes to the way they initiate and receive payments, greatly reducing   more electronic payments. . . . 4

costs while improving cash management.                                                    E-invoicing takes hold. . . . . . . . 4
MOVING FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC | 2

    The recession may be easing, but governments are still feeling the pain. In cities, a steady
    layoff of workers since the summer of 2008 continued in 2011, with 39% of municipalities
    saying they had cut personnel in the previous six months, according to municipal advocacy
    group National League of Cities.1 States, meanwhile, are continuing to make deep cuts in
    critical public services, as they strive to recover from the largest decline in revenues on
    record as a result of the recession. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities is projecting
    budget shortfalls of $49 billion for states for fiscal year 2013.2

    With funds so tight, governments of all sizes across the nation are being asked to do more
    with less. The Obama Administration’s Campaign to Cut Waste, signed in June 2011, is
    setting the tone from the top, requiring all federal government agencies to identify and
    help eliminate waste. As part of the campaign, the Treasury Department mandated that all
    its bureaus and vendors must submit and process invoices electronically, a move expected
    to save $450 million annually. Even before the campaign, the Treasury Department had
    initiated a move toward electronic payments for Social Security and other benefits, an
    effort expected to save taxpayers $1 billion over 10 years.

    Compressed budgets, combined with the federal government’s new emphasis on eliminating                                                           Compressed budgets and a
    waste, are propelling states and municipalities to more seriously consider alternatives to
    the paper-based methods they have long relied on to receive and distribute funds.                                                                new emphasis on eliminating

    Paper in all its forms — checks from constituents, invoices from suppliers and payments                                                          waste are propelling states
    to beneficiaries, to name a few — has become increasingly problematic in today’s
    constrained environment.                                                                                                                         and municipalities to seriously

    For starters, paper is both costly and inefficient. According to the Treasury Department,                                                        consider paper alternatives.
    it costs 92 cents more to issue a paper check than it does to issue a direct-deposit check.
    Paper checks are also a magnet for fraud and theft. Organizations that were victims of
    different kinds of payment fraud in 2011 were more likely to experience check fraud
    (85%) than ACH (28%) or wire fraud (5%), according to the Association for Financial
    Professionals. In addition, almost half a million Social Security checks are reported lost
    or stolen each year, according to the Treasury Department. Paper is also detrimental
    to the environment. The Electronic Payments Association estimates that if 20% of
    households eliminated paper checks, they would avoid using more than 100 million
    gallons of gas required to transport mailed payments. 3

1
    Local Economic Condition Survey (2012 March). National League of Cities.
2
    McNichol, E., Oliff, P., Johnson, N., (2012 March 21). States Continue to Feel Recession’s Impact. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 1.
3
     PayItGreen Impact, n.d., http://www.payitgreen.org/files/resources/PayItGreen_Facts_Impact.pdf (accessed April 19, 2012).
MOVING FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC | 3

    Purchasing cards continue growth path
    Typically, the first entry point for governments seeking to automate some aspect of the
    payment process is the purchasing card. These cards allow organizations to distribute
    funds to employees via cards, which can then be used like standard payment cards to
    purchase things such as office supplies and travel expenses. Annual purchasing card
    spending is expected to increase to $255 billion by 2014, reflecting an annual growth
    rate of 10.6% for government agencies, according to RPMG Research Corp., a provider
    of research on corporate procurement and purchasing.4

    The growing popularity of purchasing cards is not surprising, given their many benefits.
    RPMG estimates the average administrative cost of a purchase made using a traditional
    purchase order is about $93, compared to only $22 for one made using a purchasing card,
    a savings of more than $70. In addition, purchasing cards reduce the procurement cycle
    time by about 12 days and the number of suppliers by an average of 16%; they also cut
    down on staff devoted to accounts payable functions.5

    North Carolina State University (NCSU) has experienced the benefits of purchasing cards
    firsthand, having been a leader in the use of the cards since the mid-1990s. In addition
    to earning rebates based on purchasing card spending, NCSU now writes fewer checks,
    which results in lower processing costs and bank fees. The university can also consolidate
    its spending into one monthly payment that can be deferred by as much as 25 days from
    the end of the billing cycle, lengthening float. Also, transparency into the card transactions
    is high, facilitating better cash management and reduced fraud.

    Accounts payable goes digital
    In recent years, a variety of other electronic payment innovations have been introduced                                               E-Payables is a technology
    to help governments overcome their reliance on paper and eliminate needless expense.
    A key area of focus is the accounts-payable function. Today, about 77% of incoming invoices                                           that seeks to reduce the
    are paper, leading to completely manual receipt, approval and payment processes for most
                                                                                                                                          manual aspects of the
    organizations, according to the IT research and analysis company Aberdeen Group.6

    E-Payables, an increasingly popular technology, seeks to reduce the many manual aspects                                               accounts payable process by
    of accounts payable by transforming the paper checks that go to suppliers into electronic
                                                                                                                                          transforming paper checks
    payments. Top-down mandates from within organizations to cut costs, combined with
    the difficulty of working with information in paper format, are the two top drivers of                                                into electronic payments.
    e-Payables, says Aberdeen Group.7

    The high cost of processing paper checks is reason enough to begin a move toward
    electronic payments. Aberdeen Group reports that the average cost of a check payment
    is $7.78.8 Plus, there are additional benefits to e-Payables, including greater transparency
    into an organization’s cash flow and the ability to avoid late-payment penalties, while
    capturing early-payment discounts.

4
  Palmer, R., Gupta, M. (2010). Purchasing Card Benchmarking Survey. RPMG Research Corp.
5
  Ibid.
6
  Pezza, S., (2011 September). E-Payables 2011: Efficiency, Visibility, and Collaboration in the Financial Supply Chain. Aberdeen Group
7
  Ibid.
8
  Ibid., p. 8.
MOVING FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC | 4

    E-Payables can help to eliminate paper early in the payment process, by distributing funds to
    suppliers through card-based payments rather than checks. Through a single file submission,
    the credit limit on the supplier’s card increases by the designated amount of the payment.
    At the same time, the bank notifies the supplier of the remittance details and payment
    instructions via email. This streamlined process lets suppliers receive payments within
    one to three business days, while eliminating the risk of fraud through checks.

    Washoe County in Nevada turned to e-Payables to increase the number of its vendors
    paid through automation, and has incurred significant savings. Washoe County increased
    its cash flow by about 45 days by reconciling the payments authorized to its bank’s credit
    card billing statement on a monthly basis. It also expects savings of more than $200,000
    annually from reduced check printing, banking and mailing costs, combined with earnings
    from annual bank rebates, based on the volume of enrollees.

    Fuller solutions generate more electronic payments
    For suppliers that are unable to accept card-based payments, a more comprehensive solution      The Duval County Public
    is in order. Governments can increase the number of automated payments they issue by
    making it possible for suppliers to also be paid via the automated clearinghouse. As with       School District expects to
    card payments made via e-Payables, ACH payments made through a comprehensive payables
                                                                                                    save more than $250,000
    program offer remittance detail, which is sent to the supplier and also viewable through a
    custom website.
                                                                                                    annually through its
    The Duval County Public School District in Florida turned to a comprehensive electronic
                                                                                                    comprehensive electronic
    payables solution when it was tasked with finding ways to improve business practices
    that would result in large annual savings. By embracing a full suite of electronic payments,    payments plan.
    the school district has improved float, accelerated payment times and helped achieve its
    budget goals. The district expects to generate more than $250,000 annually in cost savings
    and rebates through its comprehensive electronic payments plan.

    E-invoicing takes hold
    Another way for state and city governments to eliminate paper from the payment process
    is through electronic invoicing. A growing number of organizations are seeking to receive
    invoices electronically, rather than as paper documents. Twenty-nine percent of respondents
    surveyed by Paystream Advisors said they are using or deploying an e-Invoicing solution,
    while 42% are evaluating the use of one.9 Paystream surveyed more than 300 accounts
    payable and procurement professionals at U.S.-based companies in a range of industries.

9
    eInvoicing Adoption Benchmarking Report (Q1 2012). Paystream Advisors, Inc., 5.
MOVING FROM PAPER TO ELECTRONIC | 5

     E-Invoicing offers a number of benefits, including reduced processing costs (cited by 52%                                                            Working with a proven
     of respondents), fewer lost invoices (cited by 51%) and quicker approval cycles (cited by
     50%).10 But the barriers to adopting e-Invoicing are high, given the perceived difficulty of                                                         electronic payments
     managing the migration of moving so many supplier relationships from paper to electronic
                                                                                                                                                          provider that has the
     systems. Paystream found that 23% of respondents believe that their current paper
     processes work well enough, 18% think they do not have an adequate budget and 16%                                                                    resources, technology and
     think there would not be a return on investment from e-Invoicing.11
                                                                                                                                                          knowledge to facilitate a
     Many of these organizations, however, do not realize that new e-Invoicing solutions are
     available that make it easy to move suppliers from paper to electronic billing. These solutions                                                      project’s success is critical.
     let vendors enroll via a web-based system, eliminating the need for organizations to oversee
     the payee enrollment process, manage payee bank information or even make changes to
     existing payables software. Once vendors are enrolled, they send electronic invoice data
     in their preferred format, allowing organizations to initiate approved payments through
     a simple file transfer.

     With so many avenues into electronic payments now available, government agencies have
     more reasons than ever to get serious about eliminating paper from their payment processes.
     A first step toward that goal is to identify a high-level director within the organization who
     will sponsor the project and support it throughout its life cycle. It’s also important to designate
     a team responsible for making the transformation happen.

     Working with a proven provider that has the resources, technology and knowledge to
     facilitate the project’s success from beginning to end is also critical. The ideal provider
     will not only provide a solution, but will foster a hands-on working relationship aimed at
     ensuring smooth implementation and optimal usage of the system. Finally, a well-rounded
     education and training effort that includes other departments, such as audit and controls,
     will get a paper-to-electronics program off the ground on the most solid footing possible.

     With city and state budgets still tight, and the federal government pushing hard for savings
     and efficiencies, there has never been a more opportune time for agencies to explore
     electronic solutions. The variety and maturity of options now available makes moving
     from paper to electronic more practical and feasible than ever before.

10
     Ibid., p. 6.
11
     Ibid., p. 7.

“Bank of America Merrill Lynch” is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets businesses of Bank of America Corporation.
  Lending, derivatives, and other commercial banking activities are performed globally by banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation, including
  Bank of America, N.A., member FDIC. Securities, strategic advisory, and other investment banking activities are performed globally by investment
  banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation (“Investment Banking Affiliates”), including, in the United States, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
  Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., both of which are registered broker-dealers and members of SIPC, and, in other
  jurisdictions, by locally registered entities. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. are
  registered as futures commission merchants with the CFTC and are members of the NFA. Investment products offered by Investment Banking
  Affiliates: Are Not FDIC Insured • May Lose Value • Are Not Bank Guaranteed. ©2014 Bank of America Corporation                           04-14-0199
You can also read