Public Water and Wastewater Utilities - New York City Water Finance Authority Case Study - New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority - NYC.gov

Page created by Harry Zimmerman
 
CONTINUE READING
Public Water and Wastewater Utilities - New York City Water Finance Authority Case Study - New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority - NYC.gov
Croton Aqueduct

    Public Water and Wastewater Utilities —
    New York City Water Finance Authority Case Study
    New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
    March 9, 2021
Tripartite Operating and Governance Structure Creates an
Independent Water and Sewer System

 The NYC Water Board owns System revenues and sets rates as required to fully fund all the debt service and
  operating costs of the System

 NYW issues bonds for the improvement of the System

 NYC’s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) operates the System. The City is reimbursed for
  operating and maintenance expenses subordinate to debt service

 The NYC Water Board and NYW are legally separate from the City

 Leases System from the City         Issues bonds to fund capital        DEP manages capital
                                       improvement program                  improvement program and
 Sets rates and charges
                                                                            operates and maintains the
                                      Holds statutory and contractual
 Owns System revenues                                                      System for the Water Board
                                       first claim on gross revenues
 Revenues deposited in “lock-                                             Bills and collects revenue from
                                      Has no System operating
  box”                                                                      customers for the Water Board
                                       functions

                                                      1
Capital Improvement Program Funding

 Approximately 98% of the System’s capital projects costs are expected to be paid from bond proceeds and
  System Revenues

                                             $23.52 Billion
                                    Capital Improvement Program
                                              FY 2021-31

                                        System Funds
                                        $23.06 Billion
                                            98%

                                                                               State, Federal,
                                                                              and Private Funds
                                                                                $0.47 Billion
                                                                                     2%

                                                     2
Mandated Projects in the Capital Improvement Program
 Approximately 25% of the total program for FYs 2021 through FY 2031 is dedicated to regulatory mandated
  projects

                                            CIP ($ in billions) for FY 2021- FY 20311
$ (Billions)
                                                                               Other Priority Project Funding
 3.50
                                                                               Total Mandates
 3.00
                                                        35%

 2.50          28%
                                               33%
                              28%
                                                                         39%
 2.00                                13%
                                                                18%                 30%
                                                                                                  9%
 1.50
                                                                                                                11%    11%

 1.00

 0.50

 0.00
               2021           2022   2023      2024    2025     2026    2027        2028        2029            2030   2031

___________________________
1. Source: Aecom USA, Inc.

                                                               3
Mandated Projects in the Historical Capital Budgets
 Percentage of regulatory mandated project costs vary from year to year
     During FYs 2008-2010 regulatory mandated project costs were very high as the System had to fund
        Croton WFP, UV Facility and Newtown Creek WWTP upgrades

                                      CIP ($ in billions) for FY 2008- FY 20201
($ Billions)

                                                                        Other DEP Priority Projects Historical
 4.00

                                                                        Mandated Projects Historical
 3.50

 3.00
                                                                                           22%

 2.50                   48%    45%           18%                      18%
               73%
                                                                                                       21%
                                      21%
 2.00                                               23%                         30%                              22%    23%
                                                               33%

 1.50

 1.00

 0.50

 0.00
               2008     2009   2010   2011   2012   2013       2014   2015      2016       2017        2018      2019   2020

___________________________
1. Source: Aecom USA, Inc.

                                                           4
$31.6 Billion Outstanding Debt Portfolio

             Anticipated Future Bond Issuance1                                                          Outstanding Debt by Interest Rate Mode3
    Fiscal                                Issued to                       Issued                                   $4.2 Billion                                        $0.5 Billion
    Year                                 the Public                       to EFC                                      13%                                                  2%
    2021                                         $1,2192                           $300
                                                                                                                                                                             Fixed Rate
    2022                                           1,495                             300                                                                                     Adjustable Rate
                                                                                                                                                                             Index Rate Bonds
    2023                                          1,429                              300
                                                                                                                                          $26.9 Billion
    2024                                           1,501                             300                                                     85%

    2025                                           1,704                             300
    Period Total                                $7,348                          $1,500

                                         Outstanding Debt Service by Resolution by Fiscal Year4
($MM)
 $2,500
                                                                                                                                                        First Resolution Bonds
 $2,000
                                                                                                                                                        Second Resolution Bonds
 $1,500

 $1,000

   $500

     $-

___________________________
1. As of September 2020, excluding refunding bonds.
2. To date during Fiscal Year 2021 the Authority has issued $585.3 million of Second Resolution Bonds, not including refunding bonds.
3. Includes $553.26 million of Fiscal 2021 Series CC Bonds expected to be issued on March 18, 2021; excludes bonds expected to be refunded by Fiscal 2021 Series CC Bonds.
4. FY 2021 includes amounts remaining to be paid by the Authority as of the date of the Fiscal 2021 Series CC Official Statement.

                                                                                                5
Municipals – One of the Largest Fixed Income Asset Classes
  Muni market is $3.9 trillion in size and is the fourth largest asset class in the U.S.

  Primary holders of muni bonds are retail investors: “households” which includes money invested through
   Separately Managed Accounts (“SMAs”) as professional retail, and traditional “mom & pop” retail

                  Outstanding ($ Trillion)                                   Holders of Muni Bonds
($ Trillions)
16                                                                                Other
                                                                                   4%
14

12                                                                            Insurance
                                                                              Companies
10                                                                               12%

 8                                                                       Banking
                                                                       Institutions         Households
 6                                                                         12%                 45%

 4
                                                                                  Mutual
 2                                                                                Funds
                                                                                   27%
 0

 ___________________________
 Source: SIFMA as of 1/04/21.

                                                            6
Types of Municipal Bonds
  General Obligation (“GO”) Bonds are secured by a                     Revenue Bonds are payable from a specific stream of
  pledge of the issuer’s full faith, credit and taxing                 revenues, such as a user fee, loans, or dedicated tax,
  power. The “full faith and credit” backing of a General              and are not backed by the full faith and credit of the
  Obligation bond implies that all sources of revenue,                 issuer. They are issued to finance specific enterprises or
  unless specifically excluded, will be available to pay               projects and are usually secured solely by revenues
  debt service on the bonds.                                           from those projects.
  Examples: State of California, City of New York                      Examples: Port Authority of NY / NJ, Bay Area Toll
                                                                       Authority, New York City Municipal Water Finance
                                                                       Authority

                                   Revenue and GO Bond Issuance (1996-2020, $ Billion)
($ Billions)
  500
  450
  400
  350
  300
  250
  200
  150
  100
   50
    0
         1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

                                                              GO    Revenue
  ___________________________
  Source: SIFMA as of 1/19/2021.

                                                                   7
Credit Considerations
                        •   Metrics: Unemployment rate, personal income growth and personal income
Macro Economy           •   Diversification of economic base: Major employers and employment
Supporting Repayment        distribution
                        •   Demand/growth: Service area, usage trends and competitive pressure

                        •   Metrics: Budget forecasts, reserve balance, revenue and expenditure growth
Finance
                        •   Borrowing for operations? (Other than short-term notes used for cash flow
                            timing differences)

                        •   Pledged revenues: Gross vs. net pledge
                        •   Debt service reserve funds: e.g. Max annual debt service
Legal Covenants
                        •   Additional bonds test: No new debt unless debt service coverage is sufficient
                        •   Rate covenant: Pledge to increase rates if debt service coverage is not at
                            some minimum level
                        •   GO: Debt / personal income, debt per capita (tax base) and debt service as
                            share of revenues
Debt Metrics            •   Revenue Bond: Debt service coverage ratio (pledged revenues/debt service)
                        •   Debt structure: GO vs. revenue, fixed vs. variable rate, maturity schedule and
                            level debt service vs. growing debt service
                        •   Budget and planning processes
Management/
Governance
                        •   Legislative requirements to enact budget and raise income, either tax rates or
                            rates and charges

                                                 8
Credit Themes Affecting Water and Sewer Utilities1
 Outlook for the municipal water and sewer utility sector remains stable despite the effects of the pandemic
      Utilities will continue to benefit from stable, largely residential customer bases

      Some utilities are likely to delay capital projects in 2021 in order to manage cash flow issues

                  Rising Debt                                         Environmental                            Social
                   Burdens                                                Impact                              Trends
              Declines in nonresidential                            Risks from rising                Affordability for
               consumption, increased                                 temperatures and more             ratepayers remains a
               payment delinquencies                                  frequent severe weather           social risk
               and reduced rate increases                             events have the potential
                                                                      to weaken credit quality in      Existing rates are still low
               will decrease debt service
                                                                      the long term                     for many systems to
               coverage
                                                                                                        generate enough revenue
              Strategic refunding of                                Governance will be key to         to cover operating
               debt amid low interest                                 managing water resources          maintenance and debt
               rates will support strong                              in drought-prone regions          service expenses
               debt service coverage                                  and protecting systems
                                                                      from sea-level rise

___________________________
1. Source: Moody’s Municipal Water and Sewer Utilities Outlook.

                                                                                 9
Ratings
 There are three major rating agencies for municipal bonds: Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch
    Aaa/AAA/AAA is the highest investment grade ratings from all three rating agencies

    New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority’s Second Resolution Bonds are rated Aa1/AA+/AA+ by
      Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch

                                    Moody’s Municipal Utility Scorecard
             Factor                            Sub-factor                                 Why it matters
Financial Strength (40%)        Annual Debt Service Coverage (15%)       Determines its flexibility to respond to
                                Days Cash on Hand (15%)                   contingencies, resilience against potential
                                Debt to Operating Revenues (10%)          short-term shocks, and cushion against a
                                                                           long-term unfavorable trend

System Characteristics (30%)    Service Area Wealth (12.5%)              Measures a utility’s capacity to fund its
                                Asset Condition (10%)                     operations and capital needs based on the
                                System Size (7.5%)                        health of its capital assets, size and diversity
                                                                           of its operations, and the strength and
                                                                           resources of its service base

Management (20%)                Rate Management (10%)                    Refers to the dynamics of setting rates,
                                Regulatory Compliance and Capital         planning for capital spending, budgeting
                                 Planning (10%)                            for annual expenditures, and complying
                                                                           with environmental regulations

Legal Provisions (10%)          Rate Covenant (5%)                       Strong covenants bind the utility to utilize
                                Debt Service Reserve Requirement (5%)     its assets to benefit bondholders by
                                                                           operating with a comfortable financial
                                                                           margin and maintaining adequate cash
                                                                           available to pay debt service

                                                         10
NYW Credit Highlights
                               Sole provider of essential services with no competitors

                               One billion gallons of quality water is provided every day to 8.3 million NYC
 Essential Service Provider
                                residents and one million upstate New York residents, and sewer service is
                                provided to virtually the entire City and certain upstate communities

                               Independent rate setting mechanism and proven willingness to raise rates as
                                required (True-up)
   Proven Rate-Setting         Monthly debt service requirement is funded prior to operating and
 Process and Robust Debt
                                maintenance (“O&M”) expenses (Gross Pledge)
    Service Coverage
                               Debt Service coverage projected to be at or above 2.98x through 5-year
                                projection period
                               Tripartite operating and governance structure creates independent System

                               Bondholders benefit from the statutorily and contractually valid, binding, and
                                perfected priority lien on System revenues
 Strong Legal Protections
                               Current law does not authorize either NYW or the Water Board to properly be
                                a debtor in a voluntary or involuntary case under the United States
                                bankruptcy code
                               $1.2 billion and $30.1 billion of First and Second Resolution debt outstanding,
Authority Debt and Capital      respectively
 Improvement Program
                               $23.1 billion System-funded Capital Improvement Program for FY 2021
                                through FY 2031

                                                     11
Investors in NYW
         Distribution by Investor Type($MMs)1                                                            Top Reported NYW Holders ($MMs)2
                                                                                                        Investor                   TE    TE-RPI     Total
                                                                 Bank Trust/PWM, $1,800
SMA, $66,425                                                                                       1    BlackRock              1,031.7     36.9   1,068.6
Prop/Trading, $2,500                                                                               2    Vanguard                635.7      22.0     657.7
Money Manager, $49,405                                                                             3    Nuveen                  442.2       --     442.2
Hedge Fund, $9,255                                                                                 4    Franklin Templeton      404.7       --     404.7
                                                                                                   5    Invesco                 390.4       0.7     391.1
Direct Retail, $5,360
                                   Bond Fund, $415,515                                             6    Cap Research & Mgmt.    255.5       --     255.5
Corporate, $3,000
                                                                                                   7    Wells Fargo Bank        234.6       0.1    234.7
                                                                                                   8    JP Morgan Bank (CIO)    164.7       0.1    164.8
                                                                                                   9    Northern Trust          156.7       --     156.7
                                                                                                   10   HIMCO                    141.6      --      141.6
               Distribution by Size of                       Purchase1                             11   Prudential              132.2       0.1    132.3
        $5,001,000 to                                                                              12   T. Rowe Price            111.6      0.4     112.0
        $10,000,000, 5.71%                                                  $10,001,000 and
                                                                            over, 14.29%           13   State Farm               108.0      --      108.0
 $1,001,000 to
                                                                            $25,000 and            14   State Street              73.9     32.0     106.0
                                                                            under, 4.76%
 $5,000,000, 33.33%
                                                                            $26,000 to             15   Alliance Bernstein        99.5      1.0     100.5
                                                                            $50,000, 3.81%
                                                                                                   16   Deutsche Bank             91.5      --       91.5
                                                                            $51,000 to
                                                                            $100,000, 5.71%        17   MacKay Shields            84.2      --       84.2
 $501,000 to
 $1,000,000, 8.57%
                                                                                                   18   BNY Mellon                81.1      --       81.1
                                                                  $101,000 to                      19   Eaton Vance               80.5      0.4      80.9
           $251,000 to                                            $250,000,
           $500,000, 11.43%                                       12.38%                           20   Fidelity                  71.6      0.1      71.8
___________________________                                                                             Total                  4,792.0     93.9   4,885.9
1. Allotments shown from Fiscal 2021 Series CC deal. Total of 553.26 million allotments.
2. Source: Bloomberg publically reported holdings as of February 18, 2021.

                                                                                              12
Environmental Regulations and Capital Projects Spending Impact on NYW
                               Capital Projects                                                                      Regulatory Impacts on NYW
 NYW currently has multiple capital projects that require
                                                                                                   1989 – EPA implements surface water treatment rule
  substantial funding
         Hillview Reservoir Improvements                                                          1998 – Signing of Watershed Memorandum of Agreement
         Kensico-Eastview Connection
                                                                                                   2005 – New stricter regulations on surface water treatment
         Croton Filtration Project
         Water Tunnel 3                                                                           2008 – Enhanced drinking water treatment regulations
           Stage 2 is still under construction, the Manhattan                                     Future Considerations
            segment was completed in October 2013                                                          2021 – Proposed reform of the Lead and Copper Rule
           Remaining cost of Stage 2 is expected to be $738mm

                                 Historical Debt Issuance and Debt Outstanding by Fiscal Year1,2
  ($000s)                  Watershed Memorandum               Manhattan Water             New Drinking Water                                         Kensico-Eastview
                                                                                                                                                                                          bps
  5,000,000                     of Agreement                Tunnel 3 Construction        Treatment Regulations                                     Connection Announced                   80
  4,000,000                                                                                                                                                                               60
  3,000,000
                                                                                                                                                                                          40
  2,000,000
  1,000,000                                                                                                                                                                               20

             0                                                                                                                                                                            0
  ($000s)        1994             1997              2000           2003                 2006           2009          2012                    2015              2018              2021
                                                           Amount Issued                          Approx. 30-Yr Spread
40,000,000
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
         0
                 1994             1997              2000              2003             2006         2009                   2012              2015              2018              2021
                                                                                       Debt Outstanding
___________________________
1. Source: New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Official Statements from FY 1994-2021.
2. Approximate spread is calculated spread on 30 year, 5% coupon term bond issued in respective fiscal year. Prior to FY 2001 30 year, 5.5% coupons term bonds were used for approximate spread.

                                                                                               13
Water Rate Increases Moderated in Recent Years

                                  Flat-Rate/Metered Water Rate Increases in NYC by Fiscal Year

 14%
 12%
 10%
   8%
   6%         12.9%         12.9%

   4%                                       7.5%           7.0%
                                                                           5.6%
   2%                                                                                     3.4%           3.0%            0.0%           0.0%        2.4%   2.3%   0.0%
   0%
              2010           2011           2012           2013           2014          2015         2016               2017           2018         2019   2020   2021
                                                                                      Water Rate Increase

   Comparative Annual Water and Sewer User Charges for Single Family Residential Customers1
      $
    3,000
    2,500
    2,000
    1,500
                                                                  $967
    1,000
      500
          0

                                                     FY 2020 New York City Charge                       Average of 30 Cities' 2020 Charges
___________________________
1. Source: Amawalk Consulting. All estimates based on consumption of 70,000 gallons per year. Based on rate schedules in effect on February 2020.

                                                                                               14
Disclaimer
This document has been prepared by Barclays Capital Inc. (“Barclays”) for information purposes only. This material has not been produced by Barclays’ Research Department and does not
constitute investment research or a research recommendation for the purposes of Financial Conduct Authority rules or a research report under U.S. law. This material is for the intended recipient
and cannot be redistributed or reproduced without written permission from Barclays.

This document shall not constitute an underwriting commitment, an offer of financing, an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or other financial instruments described
herein. No transaction, or services related thereto, is contemplated without Barclays' subsequent formal agreement. Barclays is not acting as a fiduciary, accordingly you must independently
determine, with your own advisors, the appropriateness for you of the securities, financial instruments or transactions described herein before investing or transacting. Barclays accepts no liability
whatsoever for any consequential losses arising from the use of this document or reliance on the information contained herein.

Unless otherwise specified, the source for all graphs, charts, and other information is Barclays. Barclays’ databases are derived from various internal and external sources. Barclays does not
represent that the information provided herein is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Any data on past performance, modeling or back-testing contained herein is no
indication as to future performance. No representation is made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions made herein or the accuracy or completeness of any modeling or back-testing or any
other information contained herein. All levels, prices and spreads are historical and do not represent current market levels, prices or spreads, some or all of which may have changed since the
issuance of this document. All opinions and estimates are given as of the date hereof and are subject to change and Barclays assumes no obligation to update this document to reflect any such
changes. The value of any investment may fluctuate as a result of market changes. The information herein is not intended to predict actual results and no assurances are given with respect thereto.
Nothing herein shall be deemed to constitute investment, legal, tax, financial, accounting or other advice.

Barclays and/or its affiliated companies may make a market or deal as principal in the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this document or in options or other derivatives based
thereon. Barclays may be on the opposite side of any orders executed for securities or financial instruments that are related to or the subject of this material. In addition, Barclays, its affiliated
companies, shareholders, directors, officers and/or employees, including persons involved in preparation or issuance of this material, may from time to time have long or short positions in such
securities or financial instruments, or in options, futures, or other derivative instruments based thereon. One or more directors, officers, and/or employees of Barclays or its affiliated companies
may be a director of the issuer of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this document. Barclays or its affiliated companies may have managed or co-managed a public offering of
securities for any issuer mentioned in this document within the last three years.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Barclays and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Please note that (i) any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained in this communication (including any attachments)
cannot be used by you for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties; (ii) this communication was written to support the promotion or marketing of the matters addressed herein; and (iii) you should
seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, each recipient hereof (and their employees, representatives,
and other agents) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind from the commencement of discussions, the U.S. federal and state income tax treatment and tax structure of
the proposed transaction described herein and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided relating to such tax treatment and tax structure. For this
purpose, "tax structure" is limited to facts relevant to the U.S. federal and state income tax treatment of the proposed transaction described herein and does not include information relating to the
identity of the parties, their affiliates, agents or advisors.

NO ACTION HAS BEEN MADE OR WILL BE TAKEN THAT WOULD PERMIT A PUBLIC OFFERING OF THE SECURITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN, OR AN OFFERING OF ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, IN
ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH ACTION FOR THAT PURPOSE IS REQUIRED. NO OFFERS, SALES, RESALES OR DELIVERY OF THE SECURITIES OR OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DESCRIBED
HEREIN OR DISTRIBUTION OF ANY OFFERING MATERIAL RELATING TO SUCH SECURITIES OR OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MAY BE MADE IN OR FROM ANY JURISDICTION EXCEPT IN
CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH WILL RESULT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND WHICH WILL NOT IMPOSE ANY OBLIGATION ON BARCLAYS OR ANY OF ITS
AFFILIATES.

THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT DISCLOSE ALL THE RISKS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ISSUES RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE SECURITIES, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS OR TRANSACTIONS
DESCRIBED HEREIN. PRIOR TO TRANSACTING, POTENTIAL INVESTORS SHOULD ENSURE THAT THEY FULLY UNDERSTAND THE TERMS OF THE RELEVANT SECURITIES, FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT
OR TRANSACTION AND ANY APPLICABLE RISKS.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO ANY PROSPECTIVE OR ACTUAL INVESTORS AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE SHOWN OR GIVEN TO ANY
PERSON OTHER THAN THE RECIPIENT, AND IS NOT TO BE FORWARDED TO ANY OTHER PERSON (INCLUDING ANY RETAIL INVESTOR OR CUSTOMER), COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED OR
DISTRIBUTED TO ANY SUCH PERSON IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE CAN RESULT IN A VIOLATION OF THE SEUCIRITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED.

Barclays Capital Inc. is the investment banking division of Barclays Bank PLC. Barclays Bank PLC is authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority (Financial Services Register No. 122702). Registered in England. Registered No. 1026167. Registered office: 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP.
Copyright Barclays Bank PLC, 2021 (all rights reserved).

                                                                                                 15
You can also read