TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER

Page created by Alfred Salazar
 
CONTINUE READING
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
              K. Thomsen1, F. Heinrich1, M. Butzek2, J. Wolters2, F. Sordo3, A.I.S. Holm4
                         1
                           PSI, 2FZ Jülich, 3ESS Bilbao, 4Aarhus University

Abstract                                                        for use in the ESS target. As the history of PSI´s main
   Quite diverse concepts for targets have been proposed        spallation neutron source SINQ shows, a cannelloni target
for ESS. While there is no doubt that different approaches      does not only produce neutrons very reliably at a
are possible in principle, here it is argued that a large new   performance level comparable to liquid metal targets, but
neutron production facility, prepared for operation at an       it also allows for stepwise and gradual improvements of
unprecedented power level, should rely as much as               the neutronic yield as experience is gained over the years
possible on proven technology. The neutron spallation           [1]. Recently, a second spallation neutron source for ultra
sources SINQ and UCN at PSI feature as their standard a         cold neutrons, UCN, has been taken into operation at PSI,
solid state target consisting of Zircaloy tubes filled with     relying on a very similar cannelloni target as in SINQ.
lead (““cannelloni””). These targets are cooled with heavy      The UCN case is geared for operation with only one
water. SINQ is currently being operated for the second          target for the whole lifetime of the source in the order of
decade at a power level of about 1 MW. A first quick            30 years [2]. SINQ operates in DC mode at a power level
assessment of the suitability of this target type for ESS       of 1 MW, UCN takes the full power of the proton beam in
conditions gives encouraging results but a wide variety of      a pulsed mode, at a duty cycle of 1 percent.
technical questions has still to be addressed in more              Suggesting a step from 1 MW continuous mode to 5
detail. In particular, the limits of water cooling in an ESS    MW pulsed operation, three immediate questions arise,
configuration, together with associated issues concerning       i.e. can such a target be cooled, does it produce enough
transient loads and reliability shall be dealt with in this     neutrons, and how long would it survive.
paper. Possible paths for optimization as well as proposals        The initial preliminary assessment showed promising
for promising configurations are sketched.                      performance in all respects of a target of the cannelloni
                                                                type under ESS conditions [3,4].
     INTRODUCTION & MOTIVATION                                     Given the positive first evaluation and the undoubted
                                                                advantages of a water-cooled solid state target of the
  The good experience accumulated at the Paul Scherrer
                                                                SINQ type with respect to licensing and safety issues,
Institute, PSI, over 14 years of successful operation of
                                                                work has started aimed at gaining a more complete
water-cooled solid state targets of the ““cannelloni”” type
                                                                understanding of possible cannelloni configurations and
motivates the consideration of lead-filled zircaloy tubes
                                                                their expected performance under ESS conditions.

Figure 1: Evolution of the performance of cannelloni targets in PSI’’s SINQ spallation neutron source. A significant
improvement of the neutronic yield over hitherto solid state targets is evidenced with the use of the MEGAPIE liquid
metal target in 2006. Switching to an optimized version ““compact cannelloni”” boosted the performance of the solid state
target to 85 % of the MEGAPIE yield, resulting in unprecedented neutron fluxes to SINQ users since 2009
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
PRINCIPAL SET-UP OF WATER                                spallation neutron source, water cooling allows for hands-
           COOLING CIRCUIT                                      on access and consequently relatively easy maintenance
                                                                of the cooling circuit, minimizing down times and
   The main advantages of water cooling are evident:            therefore again contributing to the availability of the
there exists ample experience concerning this coolant           installation. Although not completely trivial at a real
over a wide range of diverse conditions and thus                spallation source at the MW power level, the principal
unrivalled design maturity compared to any possible             lay-out of a water cooling plant comprises only 6 major
alternative. This directly translates into the reliability of   components as sketched in Figure 2
the system. Second, of special importance in the case of a

Figure 2: Main components of the water cooling circuit of SINQ and UCN in the flow direction of the coolant

   The good experience obtained at SINQ and UCN at PSI             Whereas it is clear, that the conservative safe
and a very simple calculation confirm modest required           operational regime of heat transfer from the target rod
parameter values for evacuating MWs of thermal power            bundle to the coolant is lying in the convective cooling
with water.                                                     regime, it comes in very handy that water offers
   In order to cool 3 MWthermal allowing for a modest           substantial reserve beyond this. With subcooled boiling
temperature increase of 20 °C in the coolant, a flow of         significantly enhanced heat transfer rates can be achieved
less than 40 liter per second of water is required.             [5]. This guarantees that deviant beam concentrations or
                                                                other disturbances in the system can, up to a certain level,
  Q = m cp ¨T                                                   safely be absorbed without endangering the cooling of the
                                                                target. Nevertheless, for a save design the limits of water
  Q      ………….    transported heat [ W ]                        cooling have to be determined and understood as good as
  m      ………….    mass flow [ kg/s ]                            possible for the proposed cannelloni design in order to
  cp     ………….    specific heat (water = 4190 J/kg K )          prevent the target from burnout.
  ¨T     ………….    temperature increase in coolant [ K ]
                                                                  POSSIBLE CONFIGURATIONS FOR
  3 MWthermal = 35.8 kg/s · 4190 J/(kg·K) · 20 K,                TARGETS OF THE CANNELLONI TYPE
  i.e. ¨T = 20 K @ 36 l/s
                                                                   For targets consisting in their heart of filled tubes, i.e.
                                                                ““cannelloni””, many diverse configurations with their
  In addition to the general benign operational
                                                                respective strength are possible. Their variation allows for
requirements associated with water cooling, also the
                                                                optimally matching the target to the prevalent beam
radiological issues relevant in a spallation neutron source
                                                                conditions and operational requirements. A stepwise
are well known and proven to be manageable. The same
                                                                optimization of the target regarding yield and reliability
holds true with respect to the selection, procurement,
                                                                of the facility can take advantage of accumulated
handling, and maintenance of the required radiation
                                                                experience gained during actual operation.
resistant components, installations, and, in particular,
                                                                   A possible succession of lay-outs can be suggested,
instrumentation.
                                                                ordering targets along a dimension of design maturity,
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
leading from well established concepts to more ambitious          In the compact SINQ cannelloni target the central zone
approaches promising higher neutronic yields and               is made up of zircaloy tubes filled with lead; around the
enhanced power handling capability; examples                   periphery, a blanket built from lead-filled aluminum rings
configurations include:                                        minimizes water content in the target and ensures a nice
                                                               match between the beam current density distribution and
 a)   crossflow, along beam direction, horizontal tubes        associated cooling requirements. Water flow is along the
 b)   „„flat nose““, crossflow bottom up, horizontal tubes     target axis towards the tip of the nose on the outside and
 c)   „„flat nose““, crossflow sideways, horizontal tubes      then back through the center after a 180 degree turn, see
 d)   „„flat nose““, crossflow sideways, vertical tubes        figure 3.
 e)   Cannelloni inserts on a platform                            Although this configuration is well established and
 f)   continuously rotating wheel                              supported by the best operational experience available, it
                                                               is not directly recommended for ESS as it requires
Configuration a)                                               something like 300 cm2 cross-section, which is about
crossflow, along beam direction, horizontal tubes              twice the size of the beam footprint envisioned on the
                                                               ESS target. All other configurations b) to f) discussed
   This configuration with horizontal lead-filled zircaloy     below can be tailored to the intended ESS geometry rather
tubes and the cooling water flowing through the target         easily.
assembly along the direction of the incoming proton beam
is the starting point; both SINQ and UCN feature such          Configuration b)
targets. Targets at the PSI spallation facilities have a       „„flat nose““, crossflow bottom up, horizontal tubes
circular cross section, but there are principal obstacles to
build this type in a narrow rectangular geometry.                 Tubes with lead filling have to be mounted
                                                               horizontally. This makes it possible to have a gas volume
                                                               on the top of the lead surface extending over the full
                                                               length of a cannelloni tube, allowing for unconstrained
                                                               volume changes of the lead as a consequence of different
                                                               temperatures and melting or solidification during
                                                               irradiation and especially in the case of beam trips. A
                                                               principal sketch of horizontal cannelloni, perpendicular to
                                                               the beam and cooled by water flow from bottom to top is
                                                               given in Figure 4.

Figure 3: Current generation cannelloni target as used in
SINQ
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
Figure 4: Tubes arranged perpendicular to the proton beam can be cooled by cross flow from bottom to top while
keeping the necessary water volume between the spallation zone and top- and bottom moderators at a minimum. Left:
feeding and draining lines running sideways along the target can be optimized in order to match the different cooling
requirements of different zones in the spallation zone. Cross sections in the figure are not drawn to scale. Right: coarse
CFD simulations confirm the feasibility of sufficient coolant throughput.

Configurations c) and d)                                      similar to a liquid metal target will definitively be
„„flat nose““, crossflow sideways, horizontal or vertical     required; providing some water on the top and bottom of
tubes                                                         the spallation zone already inside the proper target
                                                              module could obviate the need for a separate pre-
   Further reduction in the thickness of coolant between      moderator.
the spallation zone and the moderators could be achieved      A clear advantage of arrangements of cannelloni along
by orienting cannelloni parallel to the proton beam           the beam as depicted in figure 5 or with vertical rods lies
direction. This brings the dimensions of a water-cooled       in the fact that such configurations can easier be adapted
bundle target closer to the shape of e.g. a liquid metal      to a homogenous distributions, necessary for an ultimate
target in the vertical direction. It is not clear that this   goal of a wheel target and continuous rotation.
actually provides a benefit, as then a pre-moderator
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
Figure 5: Feed and drain connections are even less in the way to the moderators with horizontal cannelloni oriented
parallel to the proton beam or vertical.

   For the case of vertical tubes, in essence only solid          The logical step between a stationary cannelloni target
fillings are possible in order to avoid unacceptable            of the SINQ-type and a continuously rotating wheel
stresses and finally failure of the tubes when fillings         consists in the stepwise rotation of a platform carrying
change their volume without having a suitable gas               several independent cannelloni inserts, see figure 6. This
cushion.                                                        would on the one hand allow starting up ESS with a well
                                                                established target type with high expected reliability,
Configuration e)                                                taking advantage of the available experience, while on the
cannelloni inserts on a platform                                other hand it could provide the realistic test environment
                                                                for qualifying the new components required for a
   Targets of the cannelloni type face their cooling limit      continuously rotating wheel, i.e. bearings, drives,
around 5 MW, given the reference ESS beam footprint             feedthroughs, gaskets and the like.
size and current density distribution. One way to                 When an insert reaches its end of life, the platform
overcome this constraint and go to higher powers has            would turn and bring the next insert into the active
been proposed as moving to a continuously rotating wheel        operating position with a minimum down time of the
target, effectively multiplying the time available to           facility; when all inserts on a platform are consumed, the
evacuate the heat deposited in the spallation zone by the       complete platform would be replaced with a new one.
proton pulses.

Figure 6: Artist’’s impression of a platform carrying three independent cannelloni inserts as well as a test installation for
components required for continuous rotation.
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
Configuration f)                                              on a well established basis and driving the evolution to
Continuously rotating wheel                                   higher yields and performance taking advantage of the
                                                              accumulating experience during actual operation.
   A continuously rotating wheel is the natural end-point     Stationary cannelloni targets provide the safe basis and
and the ultimate goal of the evolution path advocated in      their mounting on a stepwise rotating platform establishes
this and previous papers, starting from the good and          the required bridge for a minimum-risk approach to a
ample experience obtained over the last 14 years at PSI       fully rotating wheel expectedly delivering ultimate
for cannelloni targets. In a sense, it closes a loop as a     performance levels.
rotating wheel has been proposed a long time ago. The            Continuing with the picture, ““cannelloni”” (circular
essential difference between now and then is, that what       tubes with filling), could transform to ““panzarotti””
once was considered as a step too big, can be broken          (similar, but non-circular cross section) to arbitrarily
down into a succession of small advances, each building       shaped canned tungsten blocks.

Figure 7: Principle sketch of a homogenous wheel with vertical tungsten rods cooled in cross flow.

  The one essential ingredient for the here outlined             Quite generally, a wide / flat beam profile relaxes
evolution path is water cooling, which is a mandatory         conditions significantly for any target; reducing the
prerequisite for enough flexibility and ease of handling      pointedness of the beam, i.e. flattening / smearing out the
and modification required for changes in target details       intensity maximum, reduces peak loads and stresses, with
and types while leaving the overall installation and in       positive effects on the lifetime and reliability of the target,
particular safety issues almost untouched.                    and finally on operations costs of the facility.
                                                                 For the current work, the following reference beam
              BEAM CONDITIONS                                 parameters have been taken into account:
  The compartmentalization of the actual spallation target
material, e.g. lead or tungsten, allows some matching             5 MW, 2.5 GeV, 2mA (average), sigmaX=5 cm,
between the current density distribution over the footprint       sigmaY=1.5 cm,
of the proton beam with the material density distribution         duration 1 (2) ms, repetition rate 20 Hz
inside the target. This makes an optimization of neutron          corresponding to a peak current density (time
production and cooling conditions possible with all set-          average) in the center of 42.44 µA/cm2
ups of the cannelloni type; the enhanced performance of
the new generation solid state targets at SINQ bears             In a simple model of lead-filled cannelloni, bringing
witness to that.                                              down the maximum current density by a factor of two
  At the same time, the design and cooling requirements       dramatically changes the occurring peak temperatures in
are driven by the fraction of the highest loaded tubes in     the most loaded tube: 920 °C ĺ 480 (center), 500 ĺ 260
the center of the beam. One way to address non-uniform        (wall, inside surface), and 190 ĺ 120 °C (outside wall
cooling demands lies in tailoring the coolant flow            interface to water), respectively.
according to the needs; in parallel, adapting the beam           Investigating all possibilities for ensuring more gentle
profile offers a way to mitigate the peak loads and           beam conditions thus deserves strong attention and
requirements.                                                 warrants substantial effort; Figure 7 depicts the reference
                                                              beam profile, and also a feasible alternative.
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
Figure 8: Current density distribution over the footprint of the incoming proton beam. Left: reference beam conditions;
right: one example of a ““flattened”” beam profile obtained by adding two octupole magnets in HEBT.

   There are several ways to improve the reference beam.     gaining experience and qualifying of new required
One possibility to achieve a uniform average beam            components for which no information exists concerning
distribution on the target consists in ““painting””, i.e.    their performance and limits under the peculiar radiation
moving a rather narrow beam over the target, such that in    conditions of a spallation source.
sum a flat distribution is generated. This option does not      As a starting point, simulations have been performed by
appear to be advantageous in the case of a pulsed            different groups, for a set-up where a liquid metal (LBE
spallation target as it will induce enhanced dynamic loads   or mercury) target has been replaced by a cannelloni
caused by the temperature fluctuations occurring at any      insert of identical outside dimensions and internal
point which is intermittently hit and heated by a rather     composition like in SINQ [3,6,7]. This is work in
highly concentrated beam, or not at all, during successive   progress, and no full agreement has been achieved yet
pulses.                                                      concerning the baseline yield of a cannelloni target with
   The promising way to a flat and gentle beam profile is    zircaloy tubes filled with lead and cooled by (heavy)
via proton beam optics. On this topic there is work in       water. The most recent results exhibit the widest
progress; Figure 7 right shows an example of a flattened     discrepancy; for somewhat different detailed parameters,
beam. Adding two octupole magnets in HEBT (High              values of 58 % and 82 % performance compared to an
Energy Beam Transport between the active accelerator         LBE target are obtained [6,7]. Efforts to understand and
section and the target) readily reduces the peak in the      harmonize the differences are underway.
proton beam current density distribution by 35 %, and a
reduction of up to 60 % compared to a Gaussian beam
intensity distribution appears possible. With a
sophisticated multipole system even a flat profile (+/- 7
%) over 200x50 mm can probably be achieved.

       NEUTRONIC PERFORMANCE
   In the end, the ultimate purpose of building a neutron
spallation source lies in the reliable production of
neutrons with a useful and suitable flux level. Different
target configurations and also the beam current density
distribution have a decisive influence on the achievable
performance of a neutron spallation source [3,6,7].
   The argument for starting ESS with a cannelloni type
target is not so much based on the reliable expected
neutronic performance of such a target under ESS             Figure 9: One preliminary result: Cannelloni produce 82
conditions, but rather on the safe stepwise approach         % of the neutrons obtained from an LBE target. This
towards optimum dense targets after some period of           result has been achieved with H2O for the coolant [7].
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
Whatever the finally established baseline performance        Enhancing the brilliance of the original source term is a
of a cannelloni target under ESS conditions will be, some       sure way to boost the useful neutron flux; replacing lead
things are clear from the outset.                               by tungsten increases density and brilliance and
   Using heavy water (D2O) will enhance the neutron flux        subsequently the neutronic yield. Figure 10 illustrates this
out of the target and finally the flux available to the         effect.
instruments at the end of the beam lines.

Figure 10: Impact of target density. Left: replacing the lead filling in cannelloni with tungsten almost doubles the
energy deposition in the peak, leading to a much more confined spallation zone and thus brightness of the underlying
neutron source term. Right: in an example for a continuous wheel, increasing the density from 75 to 100 % tungsten still
has a significant beneficial effect on neutrons emanating the moderator.

                  CONCLUSIONS                                   colleagues at PSI. The contribution of Figure 1 by K.
                                                                Geissmann (PSI) deserves specific mention, the same
   It is fair to state that targets of the cannelloni type
                                                                applies to Figure 8 and H. Danared (ESS). Special thanks
feature a unique design maturity and convincing history
                                                                go to G. Heidenreich, who contributed most substantially
of successful operation. Starting ESS with a target based
                                                                to the content of this paper.
on cannelloni appears to offer a minimum risk approach,
in particular, with respect to safety issues.
   Taking advantage of 14 years of SINQ operation,
                                                                                   REFERENCES
limited development effort is required and very high            [1.]   W. Wagner, B. Blau, H. Heyck, E. Lehmann, K.
reliability can be expected.                                           Thomsen and M. Wohlmuther, Status and
   Water-cooling offers relatively convenient handling                 development of the swiss spallation neutron
and allows for high flexibility and opens possibilities for            sources SINQ & UCN, ICANS XIX, Grindelwald,
improvements as operational experience is acquired. Most               March 8-12, 2010.
important, cannelloni offer the widest range of options for     [2.]   M. Wohlmuther and G. Heidenreich, The
improvements allowing for an evolutionary path towards                 spallation target of the ultra-cold neutron source
very dense, high performance wheel-based targets at                    UCN at PSI, NIMA 564, 51-56, 2006.
power levels exceeding 5 MW.                                    [3.]   K. Thomsen, M. Butzek, F. Gallmeier, F. Heinrich
   Relatively      low     building-,     operations-  and             and J. Wolters, A Case for a SINQ-type
decommissioning cost go hand in hand with the ease of                  Cannelloni Target at the ESS Power Level, NIMA
licensing and public acceptance. The price to pay is some              625, 5-11, 2010.
initial reduction in neutronic yield.                           [4.]   K. Thomsen, M. Butzek, F. Gallmeier and J.
                                                                       Wolters, Options for water cooling a SINQ-type
             ACKNOWLEDGMENTS                                           cannelloni target at high power, AccApp’’11,
                                                                       Knoxville, April 2011.
   Part of the research leading to these results has received
                                                                [5.]   M. Shah, A correlation of heat transker during
funding from the European Community's Seventh
                                                                       subcooled boiling on a single tube with forced
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant
                                                                       crossflow, Int. J. Heat & Fluid Flow 5, 13-20,
agreement n° 202247 "NeutronSourceESS". Extensive
                                                                       1984.
and inspiring discussions with many colleagues from a
                                                                [6.]   L. Zanini, this workshop, 4th HPTW, Malmö, May
large number of institutions collaborating since the ESS-
                                                                       2011.
PP study are gratefully acknowledged. Valuable
                                                                [7.]   F. Sordo, work in progress.
comments on an earlier draft have been made by several
TECHNICAL ISSUES FOR CANNELLONI AT HIGH POWER
You can also read