Recreation and Sport Facilities - Activity Management Plan Long Term Plan 2015-2025 As amended through the Annual Plan 2017/18 - Christchurch City ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Christchurch City Council
Recreation and Sport
Facilities
Activity Management Plan
Long Term Plan 2015–2025
As amended through the Annual Plan 2017/18
1 July 2017Christchurch City Council Recreation and Sport Facilities Page ii
Christchurch City Council
Quality Assurance Statement
Christchurch City Council V1 May 2014; v2 August 2014, v3 9 September
Version
Civic Offices 2014; v4 3 March 2015; v5 1 July 2017
53 Hereford Street
PO Box 73015 Status
Christchurch 8154
Tel: 03 941 8999
Activity Manager: John Filsell
Chief / Director: Mary Richardson
Asset Manager:
Finance Manager:
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page iiiChristchurch City Council
Table of Contents
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. ii
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. ii
1 Key Issues for the Recreation and Sport Facilities Activity ....................................................... 1
1.1 Community Outcomes ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Effects of growth, demand and sustainability .............................................................................. 1
Population Growth ................................................................................................................... 1
Demand: .................................................................................................................................. 1
Sustainability............................................................................................................................ 2
1.3 Key Challenges and Opportunities for Recreation and Sport Facilities.......................................... 2
2 Proposed changes to activity ................................................................................................... 4
3 Activity description ................................................................................................................. 10
3.1 Focusing on what we want to achieve ........................................................................................10
3.2 How we will know we are achieving the outcomes .....................................................................10
3.3 What services we provide ..........................................................................................................10
3.4 Benefits and Funding Sources ............................................................................................................11
3.5 Our key customers .....................................................................................................................12
3.6 Key legislation and Council strategies .........................................................................................12
4 Levels of service and performance measures ........................................................................ 13
5 Review of cost effectiveness - regulatory functions and service delivery ................................ 24
6 Long Term Infrastructure Strategy ......................................................................................... 26
6.1 Issues, principles and implications..............................................................................................26
7 Review of cost-effectiveness - infrastructure delivery ............................................................. 28
8 Significant Effects .................................................................................................................. 30
8.1 Assumptions ..............................................................................................................................31
9 Risk Management .................................................................................................................. 33
10 Improvement Plan ............................................................................................................. 34
11 Operations, Maintenance and Renewals Strategy ............................................................. 34
11.1 Operations and Maintenance .....................................................................................................34
11.2 Renewals ...................................................................................................................................34
12 Key Projects ...................................................................................................................... 35
13 Summary of Cost for Activity ............................................................................................. 36Christchurch City Council List of Tables Table 1-1: Key Issues for the Recreation and Sport Facilities Activity.............................................1 Table 2-1: Key Changes...............................................................................................................4 Table 4-1: Levels of Service ..........................................................................................................13 List of Figures [Click here to insert List of Figures] Recreation and Sport Facilities Page ii
Christchurch City Council
1 Key Issues for the Recreation and Sport Facilities Activity
Council is aiming to encourage more people to be more active more often. This improves quality of life,
helps build strong communities, promotes personal health and wellbeing, develops lifelong physical and
social skills, reduces anti-social and self destructive behaviour. Great recreation and sport facilities and the
services they provide act as a stimulus for the economy and act as an incentive to attract families to
Christchurch. Community capacity building and support for third parties delivering services fosters stronger
and more resilient communities and lowers the reliance on Council as the provider.
Council has to provide its agreed levels of service in an increasingly challenged financial environment.
Operational savings of a minimum of 2 % per annum compounding, are required over the 2015/2016,
2016/2017 and 2017/2018 financial years. To achieve this requires changes to business practice, the
recovery of more income from customers and the closure, or non re opening of some facilities.
1.1 Community Outcomes
Everything that the Council does in its day-to-day work is focused on achieving community outcomes. All
activities outlined in this plan aim to deliver the results required to achieve these outcomes, contribute to
Council strategies and meet legislative requirements. Likewise, all Council capital and operating expenditure
is directed towards a level of service that moves the community closer to these outcomes now or at some
future point.
The effective management of Recreation and Sport Facilities for Christchurch means achieving the
community outcomes that:
• Give people equitable access to parks, open spaces, recreation facilities and libraries.
• Increase participation in recreation and sporting activities.
• Ensure Christchurch is recognised as a great place to work, live, visit, invest and do business.
• Provide services that are available locally within the urban areas.
• Support the Central City being used by a wide range of people for an increasing range of activities.
Section 4 shows how these outcomes flow down into and influence the Council’s activities and levels of
service in relation to Recreation and Sport Facilities.
1.2 Effects of growth, demand and sustainability
Population growth and demand effects the decisions Council will make in delivering services to ensure that
they are sustainable and will meet the needs of the people of Christchurch into the future.
Population Growth:
Ongoing demographic change is forecast influenced as a result of the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes which will
effect how Council will provide recreation and sport facilities, namely:
• An initial post quake population loss of 2.8%.
• Slow growth until 2016.
• Stronger recovery over 2016 to 2026.
• A medium to high growth trend after 2021 slightly faster than the pre-earthquake growth trend but
generally lagging by about seven years.
• An evacuation of residential Red Zones but no mass depopulation of the Eastern Suburbs.
• Growth areas emerging to the north and south west of Christchurch.
• Significant growth in the over 60 age group by 2031.
• A population of under 15’s proportionally larger than average expected to last for about 12 years.
Demand:
The above demographic change translated into demand for Recreation and Sports facilities as follows:
• Replacing lost recreation and sports centres in the City Centre and the North East of Christchurch.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 1Christchurch City Council
• Replace lost sporting facilities with a city-wide catchment (e.g. Porritt Park)
• Ensuring the location of the proposed Eastern Recreation and Sport Centre caters to future demand in
the North East of Christchurch.
• Delay the planned Recreation and Sport Centre in the West in line with slower population growth in
Christchurch.
• Facilities should plan to cater to increasing use from under 15’s for the next 12 years, after this the
population “bubble” of this demographic will have passed.
• Increase the proportion of infrastructure within recreation and sporting facilities to that suitable for over
60’s as this demographic will continue to grow.
Sustainability:
The Local Government Act 2002 requires local authorities to take a sustainable development approach while
conducting its business. Sustainable development is the fundamental philosophy that is embraced in
Council’s Vision, Mission and Objectives, and that shapes the community outcomes. The levels of service
and the performance measures that flow from these inherently incorporate the achievement of sustainable
outcomes primarily around;
• financial efficiency and cost effectiveness,
• ensuring the optimum community use for all services,
• the use of contemporary technology,
• capacity building within third party recreation and sport organisations,
• the efficient use of energy, water and other resources, and
• The effective use of green field and brown field land.
1.3 Key Challenges and Opportunities for Recreation and Sport Facilities
In working towards the community outcomes and influenced by population growth and demand, Council
faces the challenge of making decisions that prioritise resources to deliver the best mix of services at the
right level and in a sustainable way. The key challenges and opportunities that have been prioritised by
Council are below in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1
Key Issue Discussion
Delivering The 2010 and 2011 earthquakes damaged all Council’s recreation and sport facilities,
an effective some have closed permanently others require repair. Funds for the rebuild are limited.
recreation There have been demographic changes and changes in the use of recreation and sport
and sport facilities. The full extent of such change over time is not known, it can only be
facility anticipated. Community expectations are high and in some cases unrealistic.
rebuild.
The rebuild must be forward thinking. New and repaired facilities should cater to
current and anticipated community need. Not all existing facilities can or should be
repaired. Financial constraints on the initial repair/replacement cost and ongoing
operating and lifecycle can not be exceeded otherwise recreation and sport facilities
become unaffordable. Repaired/replaced leisure facilities should optimise
participation, sustainability and allow a degree of flexibility to change over their
lifecycle to meet ongoing changes in community need. The greater use of hubbing is
anticipated.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 2Christchurch City Council
Key Issue Discussion
Optimising The primary measure of success for any recreation and sport facility is the number of
community people using it for its intended purpose. Participation is essential to improving quality
participation in of life and a key way for Council to build strong and safe communities. Participation is
or at recreation a major contributor to personal health and wellbeing, develops lifelong physical and
and sport social skills, it reduces self-destructive and anti social behaviour.
facilities. The challenge Council faces is to develop a network of leisure facilities that provide the
right services to the right people in the right parts of town. This will have to be done in
an environment of increasingly scarce financial resources. Current and future trends
must be understood and incorporated. Multi purpose facilities and facilities provided as
part of a hub will increase. Facilities must be accessible to target populations.
Conversely facilities that do not optimise participation are not well utilised or surplus to
need should be de-commissioned. This is often unpalatable.
Council has committed to greater levels of engagement with its communities and
recreation and sport facility customers. This is essential to increasing patronage.
Providing There are unprecedented financial constraints on Council. Operational savings of a
recreation and minimum of 2 % per annum compounding, are required over the 2015/2016,
sport facilities in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 financial years. The scope and design of new or repaired
an increasingly facilities will support lower operating and lifecycle costs. It is probable that increased
challenging prioritisation will result in rebuild projects deferred or stopped. Existing facilities that
financial are inefficient at meeting community need may be closed.
environment. Council will be encouraging better business practice to lower operational costs. The
efficient use of resources will be emphasised in design, construction and operation.
Greater levels of third party funding and support will become common.
An increasingly Recreation and sporting organisations within Christchurch are under increasing
challenged pressure to deliver more with less. Following the quakes many assets and facilities
recreation and owned by these organisations are damaged or closed. There is increased competition
sport sector. for philanthropic and other funding. There is an increased expectation for user-pays
and self sufficiency. There are changes in the needs and expectations of participants
including higher quality facilities and services. These include more pay for play and
flexible options to play (as opposed to a traditional club structure). Volunteers at all
levels are in decline. Recreation and sports staff at all levels are under increased
strain. There are increasing expectations on local and national government to provide
solutions.
Without a strong recreation and sports sector Council will not achieve its goals in
respect of the sector. Council will work increasingly collegially with Sport New Zealand,
Sport Canterbury, Environment Canterbury, neighbouring local authorities, national
sporting organisations, major events New Zealand and others to build capacity within
recreation and sporting organisations in Christchurch so they are better able to meet
these challenges.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 3Christchurch City Council
2 Proposed changes to activity
Table 2-1 summarises the proposed changes for the management of the Recreation and Sport Facilities activity since the Three Year Plan 2013-16 Activity
Management Plan.
Table 2-1 Proposed changes to activity
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
Council will discharge its agreed
commitments to the Metro Sports High. This is a very expensive flag ship Government In budget (LTP)
Council committed to this in the facility and a key anchor project. The costs
Facility having previously approved CERA
2013-2016 Three Year Plan of ownership and operation are high. CAPEX $147m (2018)
the facility scope, design, degree Annual Plans,
and the Cost Sharing There are numerous competing interests.
of ownership, CAPEX and OPEX. LTP
Agreement. All major Future impacts of the current business 2018 onward
As with all major recreation and
recreation and sporting case are ambiguous. Sport NZ OPEX: $3M pa
sporting facilities the Metro Sports
facilities undergo major change Facility Lifecycle: $5m pa
Facility will undergo major change Detailed ongoing facility and business
throughout its life in order to Stakeholders
throughout its life to fulfil its planning is needed including how facility
fulfil their intended purpose. Depreciation and overheads
intended purpose. Council must change will be provided for. not included
plan for this.
High. CERA are involved in many diverse
CERA, proposed changes to CERA projects and issues They are responsible Government
CER Act provides a limited
and the CER Act will be for projects that will conclude after 2016. None foreseen
lifespan for CERA in its present CERA
implemented over the course of this
form. Ongoing Council engagement with CERA
LTP
and Government is needed.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 4Christchurch City Council
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
In budget (LTP)
Formal commitment in the Community
2013-2016 TYP and 2013/2014 Board CAPEX: 30.5M (2017)
Low. Level of service and financial
The North Eastern Recreation and Annual Plan. QEII at Parklands implications are well understood, location Facility From 2018
Sports Centre located at QEII Park was an agreed temporary and scope will have been agreed. Stakeholders
will be opened in Q2 2017/ Q4 2018. facility until the North Eastern OPEX: $1.4M pa
Council will close QEII at Parklands. Recreation and Sports Centre Further investegations are needed on User Groups
Lifecycle: $730K pa
is opened as partial detailed design, programming and operation Community
replacement for QEII. Depreciation and overheads not
Focus Groups included
Annual Plans, In budget (LTP)
Moderate. A sports hub at Nga Puna Wai is LTP CAPEX: 6.7M (2015)
a long term project with a cost of over $100M Sport NZ Civil and facility: $11M
Council will build an athletics Formal commitment in the and a number of contributing stakeholders.
2013-2016 TYP and Facility
track at Nga Puna Wai as part Stakeholders From 2015
2013/2014 Annual Plan and If Council approves Nga Puna Wai as the
of a sporting hub based on an
as part of a special location detailed planning with stakeholders Community OPEX: $640K pa
approved master plan, or, be
consultative process will be needed to develop a robust Board
looking for an alternative. Lifecycle: $134K pa
undertaken in 2014. masterplan and the agreed facilities over a
extended timeframe of up to 50 years. Who User Groups Civil lifecycle: $110K pa
pays for what will be of primary interest. Community Depreciation and overheads not
Focus Groups included
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 5Christchurch City Council
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
Facilities consented under the
provisions of the CER Act that Low. There are not many facilities involved In Budget
Council decides have a permanent Provisions of the CER Act and and none that would have significent
Council have committed
future need to be re-consented. existing legislation (RMA, LGA impediments of that lack community support. SCP
to spending the proceeds
These include the High Performance and RA). Provisions of
Further investegations are governed by of insurance at Rugby
Sport Centre at Jellie Park and AMI The lease agreement with RMA, LGA and
statute under the RMA, LGA and Reserves League Park ($270K) on
Stadium on Rugby League Park. Rugby League over a Reserves act
act. The district plan review may assist. re-establishing Rugby
Should AMI Stadium remain on temporary stadium at Rugby Should AMI Stadium remain on Rugby League on Rugby
District Plan
Rugby League Park past April 2016, League Park ends in April League Park past April 2016, Council will League Park orhelping
review
Council may have to consider 2016. have to consider investigating a future home them to find an
assisting Rugby League in finding a for Rugby League. alternative.
new home.
High. This is a significent and expensive
Council commitments in its anchor project dependent on a resolution of
Council will need to determine its Cost Sharing Agreement a large insurance claim over the former AMI In budget (LTP)
role in the provision of a permanent with Government. There is Government
Stadium.
replacement stadium as described much ambiguity in the CERA CAPEX $253M
in the CCRP. agreement, clarity is Further investegations include a complete
needed over time. and detailed business case and a close
relationship with Government.
Facility
Low. Moderate cost, shared with the pitch Stakeholders In budget (proceeds of
Earthquake damage and the owners. insurance)
The Hockey Facility at Porritt Park
geotechnical properties of the Community
will be demolished and the site Investegations are limited to a project plan OPEX: $300 - $400K
land rendering it unsuitable for Board
returned to parkland. and community engagement on the
any built facilities.
reinstatement. Community
Focus Groups
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 6Christchurch City Council
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
Low. A viable alternative is planned. The
The Wharenui Pool will be closed The pool is between 35-40% operators are fully aware and this has been MOE Potential Saving
when the Metro Sports Facility NBS and at the end of its useful signalled in Councils 2014 review of the CAPEX: $6-$11M
life. The hall is under 34% and Wherenui Club
opens in 2020, the closed sports hall Aquatic Facilities Plan.
will be repaired. The services unable to be repaired. All Community From 2018
services can be provided from Council’s vehicle for decision making is the
provided from the pool and hall will Board OPEX: $30K pa
the Metro which is within 2 km 2015-2025 LTP process. Investegations are
be provided from the Metro. Lifecycle: $50Kpa
away. needed on exactly how services are migrated
between facilities.
The Rawhiti Golf Course will be Saving
Rawhiti Club
operated by the Rawhiti Golf Club Low. The level of service will continue. CAPEX: Up to $2M for
from September 2015. Council The Rawhiti Golf Club are in a Community 25 yr life
A management agreement between the Club
intends to lease golf buildings to the better position than council to Board OPEX: $200K pa from
and Council will be agreed. Council will
Club and grant the Club a licence to operate the course. 2015
followstandard process with any lease or User Groups
operate a golf course on the Lifecycle: $50K pa from
licence agreements it chooses to make.
existing course footprint. Affected stafff 2015
Council will seek expressions of
interest for the development and The existing lease has expired Low. The level of service will continue. Lesees Potential Saving
operation of a motor camp or and Council wishes the motor Community CAPEX: $2.3 - $3M
An EOI process will be initiated when it can
similar on the site of the existing camp services to continue at Board OPEX: $10Kpa
be informed by the emerging district plan
Motor Camp at South New no additional cost to rates. Lifecycle: $20Kpa
section on coastal erosion. Campers
Brighton.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 7Christchurch City Council
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
Low. Increased charges are usually
Sport NZ
implemented over time with plenty of
Existing user charges and warning. Council and third party funding is Sport
Council subsidies are not availiable to assist in offsetting costs. Canterbury
Council will collect a wider range sufficient to maintain or Additional Revenue
and increased charges from users improve sports fields to the Council’s vehicle for decision making is the Regional
of sports fields. required standard. A charge 2015-2025 LTP process. Investigations are Sporting $50K pa
will act as a tool to manage needed on the nature of changed charges Organisations
inefficient use of fields. and sources of assistance for user groups.
Philanthropic
Benchmaarking with other cities will be
funders
completed.
Facility In budget
Stakeholders
Moderate. Level of service and financial CAPEX: 23M (2017)
The Western Recreation and
implications are not well understood, location Community
Sports Centre probably located Formal commitment in the From 2018
and scope will have not been agreed. Board
around Hornby will be opened in 2013-2016 TYP and
Community OPEX: $1.4M pa
2019. 2013/2014 Annual Plan. Further investegations needed on location,
scope detailed design, programming and Focus Groups Lifecycle: $460K pa
operation. Annual Plans, Depreciation and overheads not
LTP included
Facility In budget
Moderate. Level of service and financial Stakeholders
A Recreation and Sports Centre implications are not well understood, location Community CAPEX: 17M
located in the Linwood/Woolston Commitment in the 2015/2025 and scope will have not been agreed. Board OPEX: $0.9M pa
area will be opened by the close of Long Term Plan Further investegations needed on location, Community
2018. Lifecycle: $300K pa
scope detailed design, programming and Focus Groups
Depreciation and overheads not
operation. Annual Plans, included
LTP
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 8Christchurch City Council
Options for
Level of significance? What consultation Financial Implication
Key Change Reason investigations are needed? and (If Any)
engagement
Significant damage was done Government
to Council’s facilities at Kerrs Moderate. This could be a significent and CERA
Reach in the 2010 and 2011 expensive project dependent on a resolution Annual Plans,
Council will need to determine its quakes. There may be of a number of major hydrological issues and LTP
role, if any, in the provision of flat opportunities to replace or the Governments intentions for the red zone.
Sport NZ None forseen
water facilities around the river develop flat water facilities as Further investegations include a complete
Avon part of hydrological planning Environment
and detailed business case and a close Canterbury
for the Avon and the decision relationship with Government informing a full
making process for the Red Ngai Tahu
community consultation.
Zone.
There is increased opportunity
for partnerships with the MOE
over the community use of MOE
school pools and other Low. Council have only committed to an Sport
sporting facilities. These investegation. Canterbury
School pool and sports facility facilities are often in local
partnerships with schools will be communities of need. Full recreation and sport facility investigation Regional None forseen
investigated on an ongoing basis. Increased opportunity exists process needed. Council’s vehicle for Sporting
due to the MOE rebuild decision making is the 2015-2025 LTP and Organisations
programme and changed subsequent annual plan processes.
Community
provision of schools in Board
Christchurch following the
quake.
Avebury Park paddling pool will be
Pool was extensively damaged Low. Level of service implications are well
repaired. Woodham Park, Abberley
in the earthquake. Repair will known.
Park and Edgar MacIntosh Park will LTP
be complete by December
not be replaced at the end of their All invesategations are complete.
2015.
useful life. (10 years plus)
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 9Christchurch City Council
3 Activity description
3.1 Focusing on what we want to achieve
Council undertakes activities in order to deliver on the community outcomes for Christchurch. The
outcomes that relate most directly to the management of the city’s Recreation and Sport Facilities network
are that:
• People have equitable access to parks, open spaces, recreation facilities and libraries.
• There is increasing participation in recreation and sporting activities.
• Christchurch is recognised as a great place to work, live, visit, invest and do business.
• Services are available locally within the urban areas.
• Central City is being used by a wide range of people for an increasing range of activities.
Council is aiming to encourage more people to be more active more often. This improves quality of life,
helps build strong communities, promotes personal health and wellbeing, develops lifelong physical and
social skills and reduces anti-social and self destructive behaviour. Great recreation and sport facilities act
as a stimulus for the economy and act as an incentive to attract families to Christchurch.
3.2 How we will know we are achieving the outcomes
We will know we are achieving the above outcomes when we see the following results:
• The provision of recreation and sport facilities that give all members of the community the opportunity
to participate and enjoy recreation and sport. Participation exceeds pre-quake levels.
• Council facilities that effectively complement the existing (non-Council) network of facility provision,
particularly where other organisations are unable to meet identified community need.
• Facilities that are well utilised, sustainable and perform well where benchmarked against others
nationwide.
• Strong and sustainable community recreation and sporting of organisations that effectively deliver
recreation and sport activities to the community and enhance the opportunities available.
• Christchurch residents and visitors are choosing the central city as a destination for recreation and
sport.
3.3 What services we provide
This activity includes the following services:
• Multi-purpose recreation and sport centres, swimming pools, stadia and other recreation and sporting
facilities. Facilities provided at a city-wide and local level as appropriate.
• A Metro Sports Facility in the City Centre.
• Facility based recreational and sporting programmes and activities.
• Accessible community-based recreational and sporting programmes and events
• Capacity building of recreation and sport through community organisations and individuals at all levels.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 10Christchurch City Council 3.4 Benefits and Funding Sources 3.4.1 Who Benefits? Who benefits? Key: Individual Full Identifiable part of the community Majority Whole community Some Explanatory Comments: Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 11
Christchurch City Council
3.4.2 Who pays?
Funding - Other revenue General rate Targeted rate
Fees / User Grants &
Charges Subsidies
49% 0% 51% 0%
Some Majority
Note, Funding Split % is derived from the ‘Summary of Cost for Activity’ ( section 13).
Key: Typically
Full All or almost all the cost is funded from that source. If the comment is 95%+
made in the general or targeted rate columns it does not preclude making
minor charges for the service but indicates that the charges are a
negligible part of the fund.
Majority The majority of the activity is funded from this source. 50%+
Some Some revenue is derived from this source.Christchurch City Council
4 Levels of service and performance measures
Table 4-1 summarises the levels of service and performance measures for the Recreation and Sport Facilities activity. . Shaded rows are the levels of service and
performance measures to be included in the Long Term Plan. Non-shaded rows are non-LTP management level measures, agreed with and reported to Council but
not included as part of the community consulted document.
Table 4-1
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Performance
(Activities will
Measurement
Standards Levels (We will know we Current (targets) by
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Benchmarks Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Multi-purpose recreation and sport centres, swimming pools, stadia and other recreation and sporting facilities
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 13Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.1.1 7.0.1.1 7.0.1.1 7.0.1.1 7.0.1.1
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose 7.0.1.1 7.0.1.1 Availability Graham Condon, Graham Condon, Graham Condon, Graham Condon,
residents recreation and (m2 x Jellie Park and Jellie Park and Jellie Park and Jellie Park,
access to fit- sport centres, Multi-purpose 3 multi-purpose
recreation and sport recreation and hours/population) Pioneer : Pioneer: Pioneer and QEII: Pioneer, Metro
for-purpose swimming pools, Indoor pool: Open 364 days per Open 364 days per Open 364 days per Sports Facility,
stadia and other centres are open and sport centres:
recreation and Christchurch 0.74 year year year North East and
sporting recreation and availiable (opening Graham Condon,
hours subject to Jellie Park and Manukau 0.83 99-106 hrs/week 99-106 hrs/week 99-106 hrs/week Western,
facilities sporting facilities. Waitakare 1.38 Monday to Friday: Monday to Friday: Monday to Friday: Woolston/Linwood:
Facilities provided maintenance, public Pioneer
holiday schedules and Hutt City 1.79 5.30am-9.30pm 5.30am-9.30pm 5.30am-9.30pm Open 364 days per
at a city-wide and Open 364 days per Wellington 2.41 Saturday/Sunday: Saturday/Sunday: Saturday/Sunday: year
local level as rebuild priorities
year 7.00am-8.00pm 7.00am-8.00pm 7.00am-8.00pm 99-106 hrs/week
appropriate. Indoor court: (opening hours (opening hours (opening hours Monday to Friday:
General Manager has
106 hrs/week Christchurch 1.48 subject to subject to subject to 5.30am-9.30pm
A Metro Sports discretion to amend
Facility in the City opening hours (+/- 1 7 days/week Manukau 2.56 maintenance, maintenance, maintenance, Saturday/Sunday:
Centre. hr/day) for the multi- Wellington 7.11 public holiday public holiday public holiday 7.00am-8.00pm
purpose recreation and (opening hours Dunedin 11.05 schedules and schedules and schedules and (opening hours
Christchurch sport centres with no subject to rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities) subject to
residents and net negative impact on maintenance, Space maintenance,
visitors are operational expenditure public holiday (m2/1000 public holiday
choosing the schedules and population) schedules and
central city as a rebuild priorities Indoor pool: rebuild priorities)
destination for Manukau 9.97
recreation and Waitakare 12.58
sport. Christchurch 6.98
Hutt City 20.34
Facility based Wellington 22.96
recreational and
sporting Indoor court:
programmes and Christchurch 14.0
activities. Manukau 30.8
Wellington 84.6
Dunedin 153.5
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 14Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2 7.0.1.2
(cont) residents recreation and
5 public outdoor pools, 5 public outdoor See the
access to fit- sport centres, Five public outdoor Five public outdoor Five public outdoor Six public outdoor
Jellie Park, Lyttelton, pools open benchmarks in
for-purpose swimming pools, pools open pools open pools open pools open
Waltham, Halswell, seasonally; subsection 7.0.1.1
recreation and stadia and other seasonally: seasonally: seasonally: seasonally:
Templeton 5 public Jellie Park, above
sporting recreation and
outdoor pools open Lyttelton, Jellie Park, Jellie Park, Jellie Park, Jellie Park,
facilities sporting facilities.
seasonally and Waltham, Lyttelton, Halswell , Lyttelton, Halswell , Lyttelton, Halswell , Lyttelton, Halswell,
Facilities provided
available (opening Halswell, Templeton and Templeton and Templeton and Linwood /
at a city-wide and
hours subject to Templeton Waltham; Waltham; Waltham; Woolston,
local level as
maintenance, public (Lyttelton & open Nov to Mar open Nov to Mar open Nov to Mar Templeton and
appropriate.
holiday schedules and Waltham closed Waltham;
pending repair) (subject to (subject to (subject to
Facility based rebuild priorities maintenance, maintenance, maintenance, open Nov to Mar
recreational and public holiday public holiday public holiday (subject to
sporting schedules and schedules and schedules and maintenance,
programmes and rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities) public holiday
activities. schedules and
rebuild priorities)
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3 7.0.1.3
(cont) residents recreation and
2 community
access to fit- sport centres, Community outdoor None, two unique Two community Two community Two community Two community
outdoor pools
for-purpose swimming pools, pools; Governors Bay, community pools. outdoor pools open outdoor pools open outdoor pools open outdoor pools open
open seasonally;
recreation and stadia and other Port Levy, are provided seasonally: seasonally: seasonally: seasonally:
Governors Bay,
sporting recreation and with a grant to assist
Port Levy Governors Bay, Governors Bay, Governors Bay, Governors Bay,
facilities sporting facilities. their operation by a
Facilities provided local management Port Levy Port Levy Port Levy Port Levy
at a city-wide and committee. (subject to (subject to (subject to (subject to (subject to
local level as maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public
appropriate. holiday schedules and holiday schedules holiday schedules holiday schedules holiday schedules
rebuild priorities) and rebuild and rebuild and rebuild and rebuild
priorities) priorities) priorities) priorities)
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 15Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4 7.0.1.4
(cont) residents recreation and
access to fit- sport centres, New Brighton, 9 paddling pools None 8 paddling pools 8 paddling pools 8 paddling pools Abberley,
for-purpose swimming pools, Scarborough, Spenser, open seasonally; open seasonally: open seasonally: open seasonally: Woodham and
recreation and stadia and other Abberley, Botanic (6 closed pending open Nov to Mar open Nov to Mar open Nov to Mar Edgar mackintosh
sporting recreation and Gardens, Edgar facility rebuild New Brighton, New Brighton, New Brighton, will not be replaced
facilities sporting facilities. MacIntosh, Woodham prioritisation and Scarborough, Scarborough, Scarborough, at the end of their
Facilities provided paddling pools are repair) Spenser, Abberley, Spenser, Abberley, Spenser, Abberley, life.
at a city-wide and open Nov to Mar Avebury, Botanic Avebury, Botanic Avebury, Botanic
New Brighton, Gardens, Edgar Gardens, Edgar Gardens, Edgar
local level as
Avebury and Sockburn, Scarborough, MacIntosh, MacIntosh, MacIntosh,
appropriate Spenser, Abberley,
paddling pools closed Woodham (subject Woodham (subject Woodham (subject
Botanic Gardens, to maintenance, to maintenance, to maintenance,
Edgar MacIntosh, public holiday public holiday public holiday
Woodham are schedules and schedules and schedules and
currently open rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities) rebuild priorities)
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5 7.0.1.5
(cont) residents recreation and
4 stadia available See the
access to fit- sport centres, Five stadia Cowles, Five stadia Cowles, Five stadia Cowles, Five stadia Cowles, Five stadia Cowles,
364 days/year benchmarks in
for-purpose swimming pools, Hagley, Lyttelton, Lyttelton, Pioneer, Lyttelton, Pioneer, Pioneer, Graham Lyttelton, Pioneer,
Cowles, Pioneer, subsection 7.0.1.1
recreation and stadia and other Pioneer, Graham Graham Condon Graham Condon Condon Hagley and Graham Condon
Graham Condon above
sporting recreation and Condon available for Hagley available for Hagley available for Nga Puna Wai Hagley available for
Hagley (Lyttelton
facilities sporting facilities. hire 364 days per year hire 364 days per hire 364 days per available for hire hire 364 days per
closed pending
Facilities provided (subject to year (subject to year (subject to 364 days per year year (subject to
facility repair)
at a city-wide and maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public (subject to maintenance, public
local level as holiday schedules and holiday schedules holiday schedules maintenance, public holiday schedules
appropriate. rebuild priorities) and rebuild and rebuild holiday schedules and rebuild
priorities) priorities) and rebuild priorities)
Facility based priorities)
recreational and
sporting
programmes and
activities.
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 16Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.1.6 7.0.1.6 7.0.1.6 7.0.1.6 7.0.1.6 7.0.1.6 7.0.1.8
7.0.1 Provide Multi-purpose None QEII QEII Fitness @ QEII Fitness @ QEII Fitness @ QEII Fitness @
(cont) residents recreation and QEII Fitness @ 1 fitness centre: Fitness @ Parklands: Parklands: Parklands: Parklands will
access to fit- sport centres, Parklands is open and QEII Fitness @ Parklands is a Open 364 days per Open 364 days per Open 364 days per close when the NE
for-purpose swimming pools, availiable (opening Parklands temporary facility year year year Recreation and
recreation and stadia and other hours subject to opened because 70-84 hrs/week 70-84 hrs/week 70-84 hrs/week Sports Centre is
sporting recreation and maintenance, public Open 84
QEII Recreation Monday to Monday to Monday to opened in 2018.
facilities sporting facilities. holiday schedules and hrs/week, 7
and Sports Thursday: Thursday: Thursday:
Facilities provided rebuild priorities days/week, 364
Centre due to the 6.00am-9.00pm 6.00am-9.00pm 6.00am-9.00pm
at a city-wide and days/yr
QEII Fitness @ effects of the Friday: Friday: Friday:
local level as quake. 6.00am-6.00pm 6.00am-6.00pm 6.00am-6.00pm
Parklands is a (opening hours
appropriate. Saturday/Sunday: Saturday/Sunday: Saturday/Sunday:
temporary facility subject to
Facility based operating until the NE satisfactory levels 8.00am-2.00pm 8.00am-2.00pm 8.00am-2.00pm
recreational and Recreation and Sport of demand,
maintenance, (opening hours (opening hours (opening hours
sporting Centre is built and
public holiday subject to subject to subject to
programmes and opened. Continued satisfactory levels satisfactory levels satisfactory levels
activities. operation during this schedules and
rebuild priorities) of demand, of demand, of demand,
period is subject to maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public
ongoing satisfactory holiday schedules holiday schedules holiday schedules
community demand. and rebuild and rebuild and rebuild
priorities) priorities) priorities)
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 17Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.1 Provide 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7 7.0.1.7
(cont) residents See the Wharenui Pool will
access to fit- Multi-purpose The following facilities 16 leased sporting Sixteen sporting Sixteen sporting Sixteen sporting
recreation and benchmarks in close when the
for-purpose are leased to provide and recreation and recreation and recreation and recreation
sport centres, facilities subsection 7.0.1.1 Metro Sports
recreation and recreational and facilities maintained facilities maintained facilities maintained
swimming pools, sporting services above facility opens
sporting Belfast Pool, and available for and available for and available for
facilities stadia and other lease lease lease
recreation and Belfast Pool, Cuthbert’s Green, Council will assist
sporting facilities. Cuthbert’s Green, Denton Park, Canterbury Rugby
(opening hours (opening hours (opening hours
Facilities provided Denton Park, English English Park, League in finding a
subject to subject to subject to
at a city-wide and Park, Fencing Centre, Fencing Centre, new home or
maintenance, public maintenance, public maintenance, public
local level as QEII Park, Rugby QEII Park, Rugby continue to lease
holiday schedules holiday schedules holiday schedules
appropriate. League Park, League Park, Rugby League
and rebuild and rebuild and rebuild
Sockburn Squash, Sockburn Squash, Park to Canterbury
priorities priorities priorities
Facility based Wharenui, Wigram Wharenui, Rugby League
recreational and Gym, Rawhiti Golf Wigram Gym, when the
sporting closing 2016), Spencer Rawhiti Golf Temporary
programmes and Park Camp, South Spencer Park Stadium is no
activities. Brighton Camp, Camp South longer needed.
Duvauchelle Camp, Brighton Camp
Okains Bay Camp, Duvauchelle
Pigeon Bay Camp Camp, Okains
Bay Camp,
Update per adoption Pigeon Bay Camp
of final LTP
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 18Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.2.1 7.0.2.1
7.0.2 Provide well Increase 7.0.2.1 7.0.2.1 7.0.2.1 7.0.2.1 7.0.2.1
utilised facility participation in Maintain accurate and 2013/14: Total visits
based recreation and current data on all 3,680,297 Manukau The number of The number of The number of The number of
recreational sporting facility, programme and 2012/13: 3.34 million participants using participants using participants using participants using
and sporting activities. service admissions. 3,596,279 Hutt City multipurpose multipurpose multipurpose multipurpose
programmes 2011/12: 0.99 million recreation and sport recreation and sport recreation and sport recreation and sport
and activities Facilities that Cross reference centres, outdoor centres, outdoor centres, outdoor centres, outdoor
2,837,579 Wellington
are well utilised, against city population pools and stadia: pools and stadia: pools and stadia: pools and stadia will
2010/11: 2.02 million
sustainable and and other 3,045,541 Christchurch rise as new facilities
perform well demographic 2015/2016: 2016/2017: 2017/2018: are opened.
2009/10: 3.68 million
where information
4,711,171 At least 3.32 million At least 3.4 million At least 3.43 million
benchmarked
against others
nationwide.
7.0.2.2 7.0.2.2 7.0.2.2 7.0.2.2
2015/2016: 2016/2017: 2017/2018:
Visits to aquatic
facilities/head of At least 4.82 visits At least 4.82 visits At least 4.82 visits
population: to aquatic to aquatic to aquatic
Manukau facilities/head of facilities/head of facilities/head of
5.19 population population population
Wellington
6.88
Hutt City 7.0.2.3
7.24 7.0.2.3 7.0.2.3 7.0.2.3
Christchurch 2024/2025
4.85 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018
At least 107,000
Christchurch Pre At least 100,000 At least 100,000 At least 100,000 participations in
Quake participations in participations in participations in Swimsafe lessons
6.75 Swimsafe lessons Swimsafe lessons Swimsafe lessons
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 19Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.3 Support 7.0.3 7.0.3 7.0.3 7.0.3 7.0.3 7.0.3 7.0.3
community Strong and
based sustainable 4000 hrs of staff There are no 4000 staff hours of 4000 staff hours of 4000 staff hours of 4000 staff hours of
organisations community support provided to relevant national support provided to support provided to support provided to support provided to
and networks recreation and greater than 100 standards and at least 100 at least 100 at least 100 at least 100
to develop, sporting of organisations benchmarks. organisations organisations organisations organisations
promote and organisations
deliver that effectively Hours to be
recreation and deliver adjusted in line with
sport in recreation and CEO office – CRA
Christchurch & events
sport activities to
the community
and enhance the
opportunities
available.
7.0.7 7.0.7
7.0.7 Deliver a high Christchurch is 7.0.7 7.0.7 7.0.7 7.0.7 7.0.7
level of recognised as a Customers are 5.8 score
customer great place to 5.6 score of At least 80% of At least 80% of At least 80% of At least 82.5% of
surveyed annually in customer average for
satisfaction work, live, visit, accordance with the participating customers are customers are customers are customers are
with the range invest and do satisfaction with satisfied with the satisfied with the satisfied with the satisfied with the
CERM international range and quality Australasian
and quality of business. benchmarking survey. facilities range and quality of range and quality of range and quality of range and quality of
facilities Facilities that of facilities (CERM facilities facilities facilities facilities
satisfaction with the international
are well utilised, (CERM
sustainable and benchmark on a 7 (5.6 on a 7 point (5.6 on a 7 point (5.6 on a 7 point Reflects new
point scale) international scale using CERM scale using CERM scale using CERM facilities coming on
perform well benchmark)
where international international international line
benchmarked benchmark) benchmark) benchmark)
against others
nationwide
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 20Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
7.0.6.1 7.0.6.1 7.0.6.1 7.0.6.1
7.0.6 Provide Meet legal 7.0.6 7.0.6 7.0.6 Maintain PoolSafe Maintain PoolSafe Maintain PoolSafe Maintain PoolSafe
facilities that obligations in accreditation for all accreditation for all accreditation for all accreditation for all
have current respect of public Enrolment in the PoolSafe National
eligible pools eligible pools eligible pools eligible pools
PoolSafe and employee Poolsafe scheme. accreditation Standard through
accreditation safety under the Yearly audit and site maintained for all Water Safety
and meet HSEA visit, eligible pools New Zealand and
national NZRA
Water treatment and Comply with 7.0.6.2 7.0.6.2 7.0.6.2 7.0.6.2
standards for Maintain
industry testing that meets the national standards Poolsafe
water quality Pool water quality Pool water quality Pool water quality Pool water quality
standards requirement of NZS for pool water accreditation
standards are at standards are at standards are at standards are at
benchmarked 5826 quality. NZS maintained
5826-2010 at 85% least 85% of NZS least 85% of NZS least 85% of NZS least 85% of NZS
nationwide 5826-2010 5826-2010 5826-2010 5826-2010
Weekly water tests by NZS 5826-2010
including facility
an independent at 85%
operation, pool
accredited laboratory.
supervision,
care of children,
water quality,
responding to
emergencies;
audited by
Water Safety
New Zealand
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 21Christchurch City Council
Results Method of Future Performance (targets) Future
Performance Measurement Performance
Standards Levels (Activities will (targets) by
(We will know we Current Benchmarks
of Service contribute to
are meeting the Performance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 10
these results,
strategies and level of service
(we provide) if…..) 2024/25
legislation) 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Achieve a cost 7.0.9 7.0.9 7.0.9.1 7.0.9.1 7.0.9.1
7.0.9 efficient level of Benchmarking 7.0.9 The cost of The cost of The cost of The nett cost of
service for indicates that $1.86 per visitor Manukau service delivery service delivery service delivery service per visitor
the Council The nett cost of and per resident is
recreation $14.04 per resident $0.90/visitor for recreation and for recreation and for recreation and
provides a cost service delivery is expected to rise as
and sport $8.01/resident sport facilities: sport facilities: sport facilities:
efficient level of divided by the total additional facilities
facilities Christchurch Less than $2.20 Less than $2.20 Less than $2.20
service visitors and total Pre Quake Hutt City come on line in
per visitor per visitor per visitor
compared with residents 2018 and beyond.
$2.32/visitor $1.24/visitor
similar $16.72/resident $11.99/resident 7.0.9.2 7.0.9.2 7.0.9.2
operations The cost of The cost of The cost of
within New Wellington service delivery service delivery service delivery
Zealand. $2.28/visitor for recreation and for recreation and for recreation and
$23.32/resident sport facilities: sport facilities: sport facilities:
Christchurch Less than $18.65 Less than $18.65 Less than $18.65
$1.86/visitor per resident per resident per resident
$14.04/resident
7.0.10 7.0.10
7.0.10 Achieve a cost Benchmarking 7.0.10 7.0.10 7.0.10 7.0.10 The nett cost of
efficient level of indicates that Hutt City service per visitor
service for the Council The nett cost of $2.25 per swim/ The cost of service The cost of service The cost of service and per resident is
$2.28/swim
aquatic facilities provides a cost service delivery is participation delivery for aquatic delivery for aquatic delivery for aquatic expected to rise as
efficient level of divided by the total facilities :less than facilities: less than facilities: less than additional facilities
Manukau
service visitors to aquatic $2.81 per aquatic/ $2.81 per aquatic/ $2.81 per aquatic/ come on line in
Christchurch $2.42/swim
compared with facilities participation participation participation 2018 and beyond.
Pre Quake
similar $3.34/swim Wellington
operations $2.89/swim
within New
Zealand. Christchurch
$2.25 per swim/
participation
Recreation and Sport Facilities Page 22You can also read
