Review of Constitutional d'études
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Review of Constitutional Studies/ Revue d’études constitutionnelles – Call for Papers Review of Constitutional Studies Call for Papers – Fall 2021 The Review of Constitutional Studies is now accepting submissions of manuscripts in English or French for Volume 26.1. Published by the Centre for Constitutional Studies since 1993, the Review is Canada’s only peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary academic journal dedicated to the exploration and analysis of constitutional law and theory. The Review publishes original scholarly work on the theoretical, functional and doctrinal aspects of constitutional law, and provides a forum for the analysis of constitutionalism in its various political, social, and historical contexts. The journal also welcomes articles with a focus on comparative or global constitutional perspectives. Manuscripts should be submitted by September 24th, 2021. They must not have been previously published, nor be under review elsewhere. Authors can expect the double-blind peer review process to take approximately eight weeks. Articles should be submitted to Patricia Paradis, Managing Editor (pparadis@ualberta.ca).
Book reviews should be submitted to Professor Joshua Nichols
(joshua.nichols@mcgill.ca).
For more information, please refer to the journal’s Submission
Guidelines.
The Review is indexed in the Index to Canadian Legal
Periodical Literature, the Index to Canadian Legal Literature,
Current Law Index, Academic Search Complete, CPI.Q, LegalTrac
and HeinOnline.
Prof. Han-Ru Zhou
Prof. Noura Karazivan
Co-Editors-in-Chief
Revue d’études constitutionnelles
Appel de textes – Automne 2021
La Revue d’études constitutionnelles accepte en ce moment des
textes en français ou en anglais pour le volume 26:1.
Publiée par le Centre d’études constitutionnelles depuis 1993,
la Revue est le seul périodique interdisciplinaire canadien
avec comité de lecture dédié au droit constitutionnel et à la
théorie constitutionnelle. La Revue publie des contributions
originales portant sur les aspects théoriques, fonctionnels et
pratiques du droit constitutionnel, de même que des articles
critiques relevant les défis du droit constitutionnel moderne.
Elle est aussi à la recherche d’articles universitaires
analysant le droit constitutionnel dans ses contextes social,
politique ou historique. La Revue encourage de plus la
soumission de textes portant sur le droit constitutionnel
comparé et le droit constitutionnel global.
La Revue ne publie que des textes originaux et inédits qui
n’ont pas déjà été publiés, sous quelque forme que ce soit, etqui n’ont pas été concurremment soumis pour publication
ailleurs. Le processus d’évaluation par les pairs en double
insu devrait prendre environ huit semaines.
La date limite pour soumettre un manuscrit pour le volume 26:1
est le 24 septembre 2021.
Les manuscrits devraient être envoyés à Mme Patricia Paradis,
directrice administrative
(pparadis@ualberta.ca).
Les comptes rendus critiques de livre devraient être envoyés
au Pr Joshua Nichols
(joshua.nichols@mcgill.ca).
Pour plus de renseignements, veuillez consulter les
Instructions de soumission.
Les articles de la Revue sont répertoriés dans l’Index à la
documentation juridique au Canada, l’Index Scott des
périodiques juridiques canadiens, le Current Law Index,
l’Academic Search Complete, le CPI.Q, LegalTrac et HeinOnline.
Pr Han-Ru Zhou
Pre Noura Karazivan
co-rédacteurs en chef
Volume 25.1 (2019-2020)
The Review is a subscriber-based print journal. Articles are
available through HeinOnline and EBSCO. They will be available
in open access on this website as of March 2022 – one year
from date of publication.Articles
The Seperation of Powers and the Challenge to
Constitutional Democracy
Jacob T Levy
Law, Faith, and Canada’s Unwritten Constitution
Howard Kislowicz
Against Privileging the Charter: The Case of Federal
Pre-Enactment Constitutional Review
Wade Wright
The Expansion of the Constitutional Court in Italy:
Ruling the Void in Time of Political Instability
Fortunato Musella and Luigi Rullo
Review Essay
Multiculturalism Has a Past, But Does It Have a Future?
Arjun Tremblay
Constitutional Forum
constitutionnel: Volume 30.3
(2021)
Article:
1. Quebec Bill 96 – Time For a Primer on Amending the
Constitution
Ian PeachConstitutional Forum constitutionnel: Volume 30.2 (2021) Table of Contents Articles: i. Introduction Patricia Paradis 1. Cautious Optimism: Fraser v Canada (Attorney General) Jonnette Watson Hamilton 15. The Elephant in the Room and Straw Men on Fire Fay Faraday 29. Intersections and Roads Untravelled: Sex and Family Status in Fraser v Canada Jennifer Koshan 43. Critical Reflections on Fraser: What Equality Are We Seeking? Sonia Lawrence 53. The Alchemy of Equality Rights Joshua Sealy-Harrington 85. Comment on Fraser v Canada (AG): The More Things Change Richard Moon
Constitutional Forum constitutionnel: Volume 30.1 (2021) Articles: Toronto’s 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter Jamie Cameron & Bailey Fox Restricting Freedom of Peaceful Assembly During Public Health Emergencies Kristopher E G Kinsinger “This Charter applies…”: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Fundamental Error in the Trinity Western University decisions Ian Peach The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini Stéphane Sérafin, Kerry Sun, Xavier Foccroulle Ménard Constitutional Forum constitutionnel: Volume 29.3
(2020)
Articles
The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect
the Structure of the Canadian Constitution
(Alyn) James Johnson
Do Consumers Really Benefit from the Federal Paramountcy
Doctrine? A Critique of Director of Criminal and Penal
Prosecutions v Telus Communications Inc.
Catherine Mathieu
Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act
Reference
Shannon Hale* and Dwight Newman, QC
Volume 24.2 (2019-2020)
The Review is a subscriber-based print journal. Articles are
available through HeinOnline and EBSCO.
Full Issue
Articles
Truth and Reconciliation Calls to Action across
Intergovernmental Landscapes: Who Can and Should do
What?
Johanne Poirier and Sajeda HedaralyFederal Loyalty and the ‘Nature’ of Federalism
Michael Da Silva
On the Limits of Proportionality
Iryna Ponomarenko
Review Essay
References, Law, and Political Decision-Making
Emmett Macfarlane
Volume 29.2 (2020)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction: Symbolic Politics, Constitutional Consequences
Kate Bezanson and Alison Braley-Rattai
(Special Issue: Guest Editors)
Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox
Jamie Cameron
The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United
States
Stephen L. Newman
Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech
James L. Turk
Academic Freedom, Canadian Labour Law and the Scope of Intra-
Mural Expression
Michael LynkUn-Chartered Waters: Ontario’s Campus Speech Directive and the Intersections of Academic Freedom, Expressive Freedom, and Institutional Autonomy Alison Braley-Rattai and Kate Bezanson Full Issue Volume 24.1 (2019) The Review is a subscriber-based print journal. Articles are available through HeinOnline and EBSCO. Special Issue: Treaty Federalism Co-Editors: Joshua Nichols, University of Alberta & Amy Swiffen, Concordia University The implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) off ers a way to re- imagine what Indigenous self-determination and reconciliation might mean in Canada and elsewhere. It makes it possible to speak of Indigenous peoples as nations within a multinational democratic federation, rather than minority populations within a state. The papers in this issue, which were delivered at a Workshop held at the University of Alberta in May 2019, explore ‘treaty federalism’ which is a re-imagining of what we understand as sovereignty and the foundation of the Canadian state. Table of Contents
Articles UNDRIP, Treaty Federalism, and Self-Determination Michael Asch UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada James [Sa’ke’j] Youngblood Henderson Indigenous Peoples and Interstitial Federalism in Canada Robert Hamilton Constitutional Reconciliation and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Amy Swiffen Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation Ryan Beaton Book Reviews John Borrows, Larry Chartrand, Oonagh E. Fitzgerald, and Risa Schwartz, eds, Braiding Legal Orders: Implementing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, (Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), 2019) Nigel Bankes John Borrows, Law’s Indigenous Ethics, (University of Toronto Press, April 2019) Ferdinand Gemoh
Volume 23.2 (2018) The Review is a subscriber-based print journal. Articles are available through HeinOnline and EBSCO. To access the complete issue, please click here. Individual Articles “Our Time has Come”: Reconciliation in the Wake of Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) Janique Dubois and Kelly Saunders Section 16 of the Constitution Act, 1867: The Queen, the Capital, and Canadian Constitutionalism Michael Da Silva and Andrew Flavelle Martin Des Causes et des Conséquences du Dialogue Constitutionnel Jean-Christophe Bédard-Rubin Seven Conceptions of Federalism Guiding Canada’s Constitutional Change Process — How Do They Work, and Why So Many? Dave Guénette Review Essay Proportionality’s Reductio ad Monitum: Review Essay on Paul Yowell’s Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design G.T. Sigalet Book Review Yaniv Roznai, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) Neliana Rodean
You can also read
