WHAT'S OLD IS NEW AGAIN. PROSECUTING WORKERS' COMPENSATION FRAUD UNDER THE 2011 AMENDMENTS

Page created by Harold Lucas
 
CONTINUE READING
WHAT’S OLD IS NEW AGAIN.
      PROSECUTING WORKERS’
      COMPENSATION FRAUD UNDER
      THE 2011 AMENDMENTS

                                                               Presented and Prepared by:
                                                                 William M. Blumthal, Jr.
                                           Supervisor, Workers' Compensation Fraud Unit
                                                         Illinois Department of Insurance

                                                              Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen
                                        PEORIA • SPRINGFIELD • URBANA • ROCKFORD • EDWARDSVILLE • CHICAGO

© 2012 Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen
                                        G-1
New Tools for Combating
      Workers’ Compensation Fraud
          Enhanced Enforcement Efforts Under
                 the Recent Reforms

                                William M. Blumthal, Jr.
                                     Deputy Director
                           Illinois Department of Insurance
                            Workers’ Compensation Fraud

                             Overview
•   New Offense
•   Enhanced Sentencing Provisions
•   Enhanced Subpoena Power
•   Changes to Notice Requirements
•   Removal of 120 Day Requirement

    FRAUD BY MEDICAL PROVIDERS
    Billing for services NOT rendered

                                                              G-2
820 ILCS 305/25.5(a)(9)
(a) It is unlawful for any person, company,
  corporation, insurance carrier, healthcare
  provider, or other entity to:

  (9) Intentionally present a bill or statement for
  the payment of medical services that were not
  provided.

            820 ILCS 305/25.5(a)(9)
What this means . . .          What this does not mean . . .
• Medical providers who bill   • Medical providers who bill a
  for services that are not      service at more than the
  provided can be charged        statutory guidelines allow
  under
     d SSection
             ti 25
                 25.55           f can b
                                 for     be charged
                                             h     d under
                                                       d
                                 Section 25.5
                               • Medical providers who bill a
                                 service at more than the
                                 usual and customary rate
                                 can be charged under
                                 Section 25.5

ENHANCED SENTENCING PROVISIONS
820 ILCS 305/25.5(b)

                                                                G-3
Pre‐Reform Sentencing Under
           820 ILCS 305/25.5(b)
  (b) Any person violating subsection (a) is guilty
  of a Class 4 felony. Any person convicted of
  any violation of this Section shall be ordered
  to pay complete restitution any person or
  entity so defrauded in addition to any fine or
  sentence imposed as a result of the
  conviction.

         Enhanced Sentencing Under
            820 ILCS 305/25.5(b)
(b) Sentences for violations for subsection (a) are as follows:
   (1) A violation in which the value of the property obtained
   or attempted to be obtained is $300 or less is a Class A
   misdemeanor.
   (2) A violation in which the value of the property obtained
   or attempted to be obtained is more than $300 but not
   more than $10,000 is a Class 3 felony.
   (3) A violation in which the value of the property obtained
   or attempted to be obtained is more than $10,000 but not
   more than $100,000 is a Class 2 felony.
   (4) A violation in which the value of the property obtained
   or attempted to be obtained is more than $100,000 is a
   Class 1 felony.

         Enhanced Sentencing Under
            820 ILCS 305/25.5(b)
(b) Sentences for violations for subsection (a) are as follows:
   (5) A person convicted under this Section shall be ordered
   to pay monetary restitution to the insurance company or
   self‐insured entity or any other person for any financial loss
   sustained as a result of a violation of this Section,
                                                Section including
   any court costs and attorney fees. An order of restitution
   also includes expenses incurred and paid by the State of
   Illinois or an insurance company or self‐insured entity in
   connection with any medical evaluation or treatment
   services.

                                                                    G-4
Illinois Sentencing Generally
           (730 ILCS 5/5‐4.5‐10)
    Misdemeanors:                               Felonies:
        Class A                                  Murder
        Class B                                  Class X
        Class C                                  Class 1
                                                 Class 2
                                                 Class 3
                                                 Class 4

     Relevant Sentencing Provisions
      (730 ILCS 5/5‐4.5‐15 et. seq.)
• Class 4 Felony
     • Previously imposed for all violations of subsection (a)
     • Punishable by:
            1‐3 years in prison
            Periodic Imprisonment
            Impact Incarceration (Boot Camp)
            Probation / Conditional Discharge
            Fine up to $25,000

   Relevant Sentencing Provisions
• Class A Misdemeanor
     • Now possible for violations of subsection (a) in which
       the value is less than $300
     • Punishable by:
            Up to one (1) year in jail
            Impact Incarceration (Boot Camp)
            Periodic Imprisonment
            Electronic Home Detention
            Probation / Conditional Discharge
            Supervision
            Fine up to $2,500

                                                                 G-5
Relevant Sentencing Provisions
• Class 3 Felony
     • Now possible for violations of subsection (a) in which
       the value is $300 ‐ $10,000
     • Punishable by:
            2‐5 years in prison
            Periodic Imprisonment
            Impact Incarceration (Boot Camp)
            Probation / Conditional Discharge
            Fine up to $25,000

     • Forgery is also a Class 3 felony

   Relevant Sentencing Provisions
• Class 2 Felony
     • Now possible for violations of subsection (a) in which
       the value is $10,000 ‐ $100,000
     • Punishable by:
            3‐7 years in prison
            Periodic Imprisonment
            Impact Incarceration (Boot Camp)
            Probation / Conditional Discharge
            Fine up to $25,000

   Relevant Sentencing Provisions
• Class 1 Felony
     • Now possible for violations of subsection (a) in which
       the value is more than $100,000
     • Punishable by:
            4‐15 years in prison
            Periodic Imprisonment
            Impact Incarceration (Boot Camp)
            Probation / Conditional Discharge
            Fine up to $25,000

                                                                G-6
Relevant Sentencing Provisions
• Class X Felony
       • Not specifically mentioned in 25.5(b)
       • Possible for offenders who are sentenced for a Class 1 or
         Class 2 felony violation of subsection (a) AND the offender
         has 2 prior Class 2 or greater felonies in his or her
         background
       • Punishable by:
               6‐30 years in prison
               Fine up to $25,000

       * This will likely be exceedingly rare, as employers are not
         generally hiring people with 2 prior Class 2 or greater
         felonies

How do the new sentencing guidelines
              help?

• Attempt = Completed Offense
• Restitution explicitly includes Court Costs, Attorney
  Fees and Medical Costs for Evaluation or Treatment
• Stiffer Penalties
• Greater interest from Prosecutors

 ENHANCED SUBPOENA POWER
 820 ILCS 305/25.5(c) and 735 ILCS 5/8‐802

                                                                       G-7
Enhanced Subpoena Power Under
            820 ILCS 305/25.5(c)
    (c) . . . With respect to the subject of any
    investigation being conducted, the fraud and
    insurance non‐compliance unit shall have the
    general power of subpoena of the
    Department of Insurance, including the
    authority to issue a subpoena to a medical
    provider, pursuant to section 8‐802 of the
    Code of Civil Procedure.

            Physician and Patient Privilege
                   735 ILCS 5/8‐802
§ 8‐802. Physician and patient. No physician or surgeon shall be permitted to disclose any information
he or she may have acquired in attending any patient in a professional character, necessary to enable
him or her professionally to serve the patient, except only (1) in trials for homicide when the disclosure
relates directly to the fact or immediate circumstances of the homicide, (2) in actions, civil or criminal,
against the physician for malpractice, (3) with the expressed consent of the patient, or in case of his or
her death or disability, of his or her personal representative or other person authorized to sue for
personal injury or of the beneficiary of an insurance policy on his or her life, health, or physical
condition, or as authorized by Section 8‐2001.5, (4) in all actions brought by or against the patient, his
or her personal representative, a beneficiary under a policy of insurance, or the executor or
administrator of his or her estate wherein the patient's
                                                  patient s physical or mental condition is an issue, (5) upon
an issue as to the validity of a document as a will of the patient, (6) in any criminal action where the
charge is either first degree murder by abortion, attempted abortion or abortion, (7) in actions, civil or
criminal, arising from the filing of a report in compliance with the Abused and Neglected Child
Reporting Act, (8) to any department, agency, institution or facility which has custody of the patient
pursuant to State statute or any court order of commitment, (9) in prosecutions where written results of
blood alcohol tests are admissible pursuant to Section 11‐501.4 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, (10) in
prosecutions where written results of blood alcohol tests are admissible under Section 5‐11a of the
Boat Registration and Safety Act, (11) in criminal actions arising from the filing of a report of suspected
terrorist offense in compliance with Section 29D‐10(p)(7) of the Criminal Code of 1961, or (12) upon the
issuance of a subpoena pursuant to Section 38 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987; the issuance of a
subpoena pursuant to Section 25.1 of the Illinois Dental Practice Act; the issuance of a subpoena
pursuant to Section 22 of the Nursing Home Administrators Licensing and Disciplinary Act; or the
issuance of a subpoena pursuant to Section 25.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act.

            Physician and Patient Privilege
                   735 ILCS 5/8‐802
§ 8‐802. Physician and patient. No physician or surgeon shall be permitted to disclose any information
he or she may have acquired in attending any patient in a professional character, necessary to enable
him or her professionally to serve the patient, except only (1) in trials for homicide when the disclosure
relates directly to the fact or immediate circumstances of the homicide, (2) in actions, civil or criminal,
against the physician for malpractice, (3) with the expressed consent of the patient, or in case of his or
her death or disability, of his or her personal representative or other person authorized to sue for
personal injury or of the beneficiary of an insurance policy on his or her life, health, or physical
condition, or as authorized by Section 8‐2001.5, (4) in all actions brought by or against the patient, his
or her personal representative, a beneficiary under a policy of insurance, or the executor or
administrator of his or her estate wherein the patient's
                                                  patient s physical or mental condition is an issue, (5) upon
an issue as to the validity of a document as a will of the patient, (6) in any criminal action where the
charge is either first degree murder by abortion, attempted abortion or abortion, (7) in actions, civil or
criminal, arising from the filing of a report in compliance with the Abused and Neglected Child
Reporting Act, (8) to any department, agency, institution or facility which has custody of the patient
pursuant to State statute or any court order of commitment, (9) in prosecutions where written results of
blood alcohol tests are admissible pursuant to Section 11‐501.4 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, (10) in
prosecutions where written results of blood alcohol tests are admissible under Section 5‐11a of the
Boat Registration and Safety Act, (11) in criminal actions arising from the filing of a report of suspected
terrorist offense in compliance with Section 29D‐10(p)(7) of the Criminal Code of 1961, or (12) upon the
issuance of a subpoena pursuant to Section 38 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987; the issuance of a
subpoena pursuant to Section 25.1 of the Illinois Dental Practice Act; the issuance of a subpoena
pursuant to Section 22 of the Nursing Home Administrators Licensing and Disciplinary Act; or the
issuance of a subpoena pursuant to Section 25.5 of the Workers' Compensation Act.

                                                                                                                 G-8
What does that mean for us?
  § 8‐802. Physician and patient. No physician or surgeon
  shall be permitted to disclose any information he or she
  may have acquired in attending any patient in a
  professional character, necessary to enable him or her
  professionally to serve the patient, except . . . [upon]
  the issuance of a subpoena pursuant to Section 25.5 of
  the Workers' Compensation Act.

REMOVAL OF THE NOTICE REQUIREMENT
Dear Mr. Smith,
The Department of Insurance’s Workers’ Compensation Fraud Unit has
received a complaint from Michael Jones of 100 Main Street, Lombard, Illinois,
alleging that you have committed workers’ compensation fraud . . .

                Notice of Investigation
  • Prior to the recent amendments, employers and
    employees whose conduct was referred to the
    WCFU for investigation were entitled to notice of
    the referral

     (e) . . . Upon receipt of a report of fraud, the
     employee or employer shall receive immediate
     notice of the reported conduct, including the
     verified name and address of the complainant if
     that complainant is connected to the case and
     the nature of the reported conduct.

                                                                                 G-9
Notice of Investigation
• Prior to the recent amendments, employers and
  employees whose conduct was referred to the
  WCFU for investigation were entitled to notice of
  the referral

  (e) . . . Upon receipt of a report of fraud, the
  employee or employer shall receive immediate
  notice of the reported conduct, including the
  verified name and address of the complainant if
  that complainant is connected to the case and
  the nature of the reported conduct.

 Practical Effects / Problems of Notice
• Potential targets were informed that an
  investigation was underway
• Surveillance was all but eliminated as an
  option in cases involving employee fraud
• The name and address of the person making
  the referral were made known to the target

  Removal of the Notice Requirement
• Allows for the person reporting the alleged
  fraud to remain unidentified unless and until a
  criminal prosecution is commenced
• Allows for the p
                 possibilityy of surveillance byy
  insurance companies, SIUs, TPAs, and the
  WCFU
• Allows the WCFU to conduct an investigation
  without the target being made aware that a
  complaint has been filed

                                                      G-10
REMOVAL OF 120 DAY REQUIREMENT
Time’s up . . . turn in your report

               Investigation Deadline

• Prior to the recent
  amendments,
  investigations were to
  be commenced and
  completed within 120
  days of receipt of a
  complaint

   Reality of the 120 Day Requirement
• Clock started to run before the complaint was
  assigned for investigation
• Not all investigations are the same
• Many investigations simply cannot be completed that
  quickly
• Subpoena compliance took a significant portion of
  the 120 days allotted for investigation
• The number of cases referred to the WCFU made
  compliance with the 120 day requirement impossible
• Cases were not reviewed until they could be
  investigated in order to comply with the law

                                                        G-11
Removal of the 120 Day Requirement
• Allows for more thorough investigations
• Allows for collection of all the relevant records
• Allows for better report writing
• Allows for more investigations to be open at any
  given time
• Gives us a better chance at a successful referral and
  prosecution

HOW DOES THIS AFFECT ALL OF US?
Curbing workers’ compensation fraud

                    Empowerment
• Improves the likelihood that the general public
  will actually file a complaint
                           +
• Provided investigators with more tools and
  removed limitations that hampered investigations
                           +
• Provided prosecutors with more reason to charge
  cases involving workers’ compensation fraud, and
  gives them more leverage with regard to
  resolving cases arising under the Act

                                                          G-12
What does this add up to?
•   Convictions
•   Fines
•   Restitution
•   Prison Sentences

                  Chilling Effect

WHAT DO WE NEED FROM YOU?
Referring a case for investigation

Workers’ Compensation Fraud Unit
Mailing Address:
100 W. Randolph St.
Suite 9‐301
Chicago, IL 60601

Hotline: (877) 923‐8648
E‐mail: DOI.WorkCompFraud@illinois.gov

Web Site: http://insurance.illinois.gov/WCFU

                                               G-13
William M. Blumthal, Jr.
Supervisor, Workers' Compensation Fraud Unit
Illinois Department of Insurance

Mr. Blumthal graduated from the University of Illinois
in Urbana-Champaign in 2000 with a BA degree in
Liberal Arts and Sciences. He went on to attend
DePaul University's College of Law, graduating in 2003
with a Juris Doctor degree and a certificate in criminal
law. After graduation, Mr. Blumthal began working for
the Cook County State's Attorney's Office as an
Assistant State's Attorney. During his time at the
State's Attorney's Office, Mr. Blumthal worked in a
number of different divisions, including Criminal
Appeals, Traffic, Felony Review, Grand Jury, and the
Felony Trial Division. In June of 2011, after nearly eight
years with the Cook County State's Attorney's Office,
Mr. Blumthal left to assume his current position at the
Illinois Department of Insurance as Supervisor of the
Workers' Compensation Fraud Unit.

                                                             G-14
You can also read