Adult dogs are capable of regulating calcium balance, with no adverse effects on health, when fed a high-calcium diet

Page created by Benjamin Watson
 
CONTINUE READING
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
British Journal of Nutrition (2017), 117, 1235–1243                                                             doi:10.1017/S0007114517001210
© The Authors 2017

Adult dogs are capable of regulating calcium balance, with no adverse effects
on health, when fed a high-calcium diet

Jonathan Stockman1, Phillip Watson1*, Matthew Gilham1, David Allaway1, Jujhar Atwal1,
Richard Haydock1, Alison Colyer1, Helen Renfrew2 and Penelope J. Morris1
1
 WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Waltham-on-the-Wolds, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE14 4RT, UK
2
 VetCT, St John’s Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Milton, Cambridge CB4 0WS, UK
(Submitted 6 February 2017 – Final revision received 20 April 2017 – Accepted 1 May 2017)

Abstract
Although the implications of long-term high Ca intakes have been well documented in growing dogs, the health consequences of Ca excess in
adult dogs remain to be established. To evaluate the impact of feeding a diet containing 7·1 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) Ca for 40 weeks on Ca
balance and health parameters in adult dogs, eighteen neutered adult Labrador Retrievers, (nine males and nine females) aged 2·5–7·4 years
were randomised to one of two customised diets for 40 weeks. The diets were manufactured according to similar nutritional specifications,
with the exception of Ca and P levels. The diets provided 1·7 and 7·1 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) (200 (SD 26) and 881 (SD 145) mg/kg body weight0·75
per d, respectively) Ca, respectively, with a Ca:P ratio of 1·6. Clinical examinations, ultrasound scans, radiographs, health parameters,
metabolic effects and mineral balance were recorded at baseline and at 8-week intervals throughout the study. Dogs in both groups were
healthy throughout the trial without evidence of urinary, renal or orthopaedic disease. In addition, there were no clinically relevant changes in
any of the measures made in either group (all P > 0·05). The high-Ca diet resulted in a 3·3-fold increase in faecal Ca excretion (P < 0·001),
whereas apparent Ca digestibility (%) and net Ca balance (g/d) did not significantly change from baseline or differ between the groups at any
time point (both P > 0·05). Ca intakes of up to 7·1 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) are well tolerated over a period of 40 weeks, with no adverse effects
that could be attributed to the diet or to a high mineral intake.

Key words: Canine nutrition: Mineral balance: Digestibility: Calcium:phosphorus ratio

Ca homoeostasis is tightly regulated in most vertebrate species               concluded that the relative Ca faecal excretion is not altered as a
through the interaction between several organs and glands such                result of dietary Ca in adult dogs across a wide range of dietary
as bone, gut, kidney, intestines and the parathyroid gland. Ca                Ca intakes. This finding contrasts with expectations that relative
concentrations in circulation are mediated through the actions                Ca excretion would be very low when dogs are fed diets that
of the parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitonin(1), although                  provide less Ca than the requirement, and that Ca excretion
Ca homoeostasis is also maintained through adjustments in                     would approximate intake when Ca is provided above the
intestinal absorption. Ca absorption in the mammalian small                   requirement. Instead, the results of the meta-analysis indicated
intestine occurs via two mechanisms: a transcellular active                   a positive metabolic balance of Ca, where intake exceeded
transport process, located largely in the duodenum and upper                  excretion by more than 11 % across a wide range of Ca intakes
jejunum; and a paracellular, passive process that is present                  and was not affected by dog breed or the Ca source. A sub-
throughout the intestine. When Ca intake is low, transcellular Ca             sequent study(5) evaluated the impact of a diet containing Ca
transport accounts for a substantial fraction of the absorbed Ca.             at the National Research Council minimum requirement(6) of
Conversely, when Ca intake is high, transcellular transport                   0·5 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) in eleven adult female dogs (six Beagle
accounts for a minor portion of the absorbed Ca, because of the               and five Foxhound cross-breeds) over 6 months. This study
short intestinal sojourn time and a down-regulation of Ca                     concluded that despite the low Ca intake throughout the period
transporters dependent on 1,25(OH)2D(2).                                      of feeding, there was seemingly no adaptation in Ca fractional
   Intestinal regulation of Ca absorption exists across many                  excretion leading to a negative Ca balance. In addition, an
mammalian species and it has been widely accepted that                        increase in circulating PTH and vitamin D-metabolite con-
a degree of regulation was also present in the dog(3). However,               centrations as a result of the reduced Ca intake was not
a recent meta-analysis of thirty-five Ca digestibility studies(4)              detected, as might have been expected.

Abbreviations: BW, body weight; iCa, ionised Ca; PTH, parathyroid hormone.
* Corresponding author: Dr P. Watson, fax +44 1664 415440, email Phillip.Watson@effem.com
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
1236                                                          J. Stockman et al.

   This raises questions regarding the long-term adaptability of          Table 1. Nutrient composition of the Control and Test diets analysed post
adult dogs to high dietary Ca. Lack of adaptation of faecal Ca            manufacture
excretion in response to high intake may result in either a
                                                                                                                                           Control             Test
positive Ca balance or an increase in urinary Ca excretion;
however, previous data from growing dogs(7) showed that                   Ash (%)                                                             5·2               10·7
urinary Ca excretion is generally low even when dogs were fed             Fat (%)                                                            12·5               11·9
                                                                          Protein (%)                                                        29·9               27·2
diets with high Ca content. Under conditions of long-term Ca              Total dietary fibre (%)                                             5·8                5·1
excess, tissues may act as stores for Ca (e.g. bone) through              Ca (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                          1·7                7·1
changes in the degree of mineralisation. This has been                    P (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                           1·1                4·5
                                                                          Ca:P ratio                                                          1·6                1·6
demonstrated during growth and development, with abnormal                 Na (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                          1·2                1·1
skeletal development observed in large and giant-breed pups               K (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                           2·6                2·5
fed diets containing ≥5·5 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) Ca(3,7), but data         Mg (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                       376                541
from adult dogs are not currently available.                              Fe (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                        42·2               80·0
                                                                          Cu (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                         2·3                2·7
   In humans, long-term dietary Ca excess of 2·4–4·6 g/d for up           Mn (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                        18·5               17·7
to a year has been implicated to cause adverse effects, including         Zn (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                        51                 53
decreased dietary bioavailability of minerals such as Mg and              I (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                          1·3                1·3
                                                                          Se (µg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                       107                105
Zn, increased incidence of hypercalcaemia, hypercalciuria,
                                                                          Chloride (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                    2·3                2·4
urolithiasis, nephrolithiasis and non-reversible soft tissue calci-       Vitamin A (µg/4184 kJ (µg/1000 kcal))                            1076               1362
fication(8). Dietary Reference Intakes for Ca and vitamin D have           Vitamin E (mg/4184 kJ (mg/1000 kcal))                              89                112
been reviewed by the Institute of Medicine on the basis of                Thiamin (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                    1·7                2·0
                                                                          Riboflavin (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                 1·2                1·0
recent evidence related to both skeletal and extraskeletal                Niacin/nicotinic acid (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                     13·3               11·8
outcomes(9). Former guidelines, set in 1997, established a                Pyridoxine (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                 2·6                2·3
tolerable upper intake level (UL; the highest daily intake of the         Pantothenic acid (mg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                           8·0                7·0
nutrient that is likely to pose no risk) for Ca at 2500 mg/d for all      Folic acid (µg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                               483                358
                                                                          Cyanocobalamin (µg/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                            12                 12
ages above 1 year, whereas the revised UL for Ca now range                Choline (g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal))                                   669                584
from 1000–3000 mg/d, depending on life-stage group(9).                    Vitamin D3 (µg/4184 kJ (µg/1000 kcal))                              5·2                5·0
   Present guidelines for feeding adult dogs with Ca are based            Base excess (MEq/kg)*                                             175                175
largely on data extrapolated from growth studies(6,10); conse-            * Base excess = ([Ca2+] + [Mg2+] + [Na+] + [K+]) − ([PO4 3−] + [SO4 2−] + [Cl−]).
quently, the implications of long-term feeding of a high-Ca diet to
adult dogs remain unclear. Therefore, the current study aimed to
evaluate the impact of feeding a high-Ca diet for 40 weeks on Ca          Royal Canin using similar ingredients and ratios to provide a
balance in adult dogs. Changes in renal function, related hor-            similar nutrient composition, base excess and Ca:P ratio
mones and vitamin D metabolites, food intake, diet digestibility,         (Table 1). To achieve this, both diets were composed of similar
and soft tissue and bone mineralisation were measured to support          quantities of pork meal, animal fat, soya and fish oils, beet pulp,
the mineral balance data and to monitor the health of the dogs.           cereal and flavourings, with the additional Ca and P in the test
                                                                          diet provided through a combination of bone ash from protein
                                                                          meal and supplemented calcium carbonate. The high-Ca diet
Methods
                                                                          provided 7·1 g Ca/4184 kJ (1000 kcal), whereas the control diet
Dogs                                                                      provided 1·7 g Ca/4184 kJ (1000 kcal); these inclusion levels
                                                                          correspond to 710 and 170 % of the National Research Council
In all, eighteen neutered adult Labrador Retrievers (Labradors;
                                                                          recommended allowance for the test and the control diets,
nine males and nine females) aged 2·5–7·4 years (median 3·2
                                                                          respectively(6). The nutrient composition of both diets were
years) were selected for this study. All dogs underwent a pretrial
                                                                          analysed at the Mars Petcare Europe Central Laboratory post
health assessment, including a physical examination and
                                                                          production, and were compliant with both the American Asso-
haematological, biochemical and urine analysis, to ensure they
                                                                          ciation of Feed Control Officials(10) and the National Research
were eligible for the study. Dogs were assigned to either Control
                                                                          Council(6) recommended allowance values for adult dogs.
or Test (high-Ca) diet groups. The groups were stratified
according to sex, age, body weight (BW), familial affiliation (litter
mates) and energy requirements to maintain an ideal body                  Study design
condition score (/kg BW0·75). The Control group comprised eight
                                                                          All dogs were fed the control diet during the first 9 weeks of the
dogs, whereas the Test group comprised ten dogs. The research
                                                                          study. Baseline measures were obtained during weeks 8 and 9.
protocol was reviewed and approved by the WALTHAM©
                                                                          Afterwards, the Test group was transitioned to a high-Ca diet for
Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body and carried out under
                                                                          a period of 40 weeks, whereas the Control group remained on
the authority of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
                                                                          the control diet. At the end of the test diet feeding, the Test
                                                                          group was transitioned back to the control diet for an additional
Diets
                                                                          5 weeks until the conclusion of the study.
Single batches of two dry extruded diets (the control diet and               Dogs were housed according to their diet groups for the
the high-Ca test diet) were formulated and manufactured by                duration of the study. During the days of urine and faeces
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
                                                   High calcium intake in adult dogs                                              1237

sample collection, dogs were housed individually and moni-            Urinalysis
tored 24 h/d to ensure all samples were collected and the dogs
                                                                      A 5 ml freshly voided urine sample was collected from each dog
did not practice coprophagia. When individually housed, dogs
                                                                      and analysed within 30 min for pH, glucose, protein, blood and
were still in the company of other dogs and were allowed 1 h/d
                                                                      Hb (Siemens Multistix 10SG; Siemens AG). Following collection,
of supervised play interaction with their group. Food intake
                                                                      specific gravity was assessed using a refractometer (Sinotech
and faecal quality were recorded daily. Fasted BW and body
                                                                      RHCN-200ATC; Sinotech). The urine was then centrifuged at
condition score(11) were recorded weekly. Food provision
                                                                      9391 g for 5 min and the sediment was separated and evaluated
was adjusted weekly for each dog to maintain an ideal body
                                                                      under 20× magnification for evidence of crystals, erythrocytes,
condition score. All dogs had a full physical examination
                                                                      leucocytes, bacteria or casts. Urine albumin was measured with a
performed by a researcher (J. S.) at each sampling occasion.
                                                                      canine-specific ELISA (ab157685; Abcam PLC) and urinary crea-
   Diet digestibility, mineral balance, glomerular filtration rate
                                                                      tinine was measured using the Beckman Coulter creatinine assay
(GFR) and blood sampling for the health parameters outlined
                                                                      (OSR6178; Olympus AU400 biochemistry analyser). The urinary
below were performed at baseline and at 8-week intervals
                                                                      albumin:creatinine ratio was then calculated for each sample.
(8, 16, 24, 32 and 40 weeks) throughout the study. Radiography
and abdominal ultrasound scanning were performed at the
                                                                      Glomerular filtration rate
beginning of the first test week and at subsequent 8-week
intervals. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was                 GFR was determined using the iohexol clearance method(12).
conducted at baseline and at weeks 24 and 40. Urine super             In brief, 300 mg I/kg iohexol was administered over a 3-min
saturation was assessed at weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48.            period, via a cephalic catheter, followed by a heparinised
                                                                      saline flush. The completion of the injection represented time-
                                                                      zero. Blood samples of 2 ml volume were collected from the
Tests and measures – complete blood count (haematology),
                                                                      cephalic vein into gel-activated serum clot tubes at 2, 3 and
biochemistry and ionised calcium
                                                                      4 h post iohexol infusion. Blood samples were then centrifuged at
A total of 1 ml of blood was drawn via the jugular veins on each      1999 g for 10 min, with the resulting serum frozen at –80°C until
sampling occasion. The blood was divided to three tubes               analysis. Iohexol concentration in the serum of each dog at each
(EDTA–2× heparin) for immediate analysis. Complete blood              time point was analysed using High-performance capillary electro-
counts were conducted using 0·2 ml of whole blood in EDTA             phoresis (undertaken by the Department of Comparative and
using a haematology analyser (Mythic 18; Orphée SA). Plasma           Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London).
was separated from 0·5 ml of heparinised blood via cen-               Clearance (in ml/kg per min) was calculated using the slope
trifugation at 1999 g for 10 min at 4°C before analysis for bio-      of the concentration gradient over the three time points.
chemical variables (Olympus AU400 Biochemistry Analyzer;
Beckman Coulter Inc.). Ionised Ca (iCa), blood pH and blood           Imaging
gas analysis was conducted using 0·3 ml of heparinised whole
                                                                      Ventrodorsal and right lateral recumbent radiographs (AGFA
blood (Stat Profile Prime Critical Care Analyser; Woodley
                                                                      CR 30-X, exposure 46–64 kV, 2·36–4·73 mAs; AGFA) and
Equipment Company Ltd).
                                                                      ultrasound scans (GE Logiq-E with microconvex probe (8 C),
                                                                      frequency range of 4·0–10·0 MHz) were acquired at each time
Parathyroid hormone, vitamin D metabolites, serum                     point. Examinations were performed in right followed by left
cross-laps (C-terminal telopeptide) and bone alkaline                 lateral recumbency with the dogs under sedation (induced
phosphatase                                                           through administration of 0·25 mg/kg Butorphanol, 10 µg/kg
                                                                      Medetomidine and 0·2 mg/kg Midazolam). All scans and inter-
A 7 ml blood sample was divided between two gel-activated
                                                                      pretation of the radiographs were carried out by a board-
clot tubes and allowed to clot for a minimum of 1 h before
                                                                      certified veterinary radiologist (H. R.). DXA (EncoreTM 2006,
centrifugation for 10 min at 1999 g at room temperature. The
                                                                      10.50 software; GE Lunar Prodigy Advance) was also performed
resultant serum samples were stored at –80°C before being
                                                                      to determine bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) and bone
shipped on dry ice to external laboratories. Analysis of serum
                                                                      mineral content (BMC; g). The dogs underwent a short sedation
PTH, vitamin D metabolites, serum cross-laps and bone alkaline
                                                                      (as described above) for the completion of this procedure and
phosphatase (BAP) were conducted at Alomed, Radolfzell,
                                                                      analysis was carried out in the supine position.
Germany. PTH was analysed using a direct luminometric
sandwich-immunoassay, which has been internally validated
                                                                      Mineral balance and apparent digestibility
in dogs. 25-(OH)-vitamin D2 and 25-(OH)-vitamin D3 were
analysed by HPLC and 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D3 was determined             Faeces and urine were collected over 5 consecutive days at
by RIA. The bone formation marker BAP was analysed using a            each time point. Urine was collected via a free-catch method. In
canine-specific enzyme-immunoassay (MicroVue Bone Health               the case of urine spillage or a missed sample collection, urine
BAP EIA Kit; Quidel); the bone resorption marker serum                volumes were estimated according to the urination duration and
cross-laps, which recognises the cross-linked carboxyterminal         size of the puddle/carpet stain. Urine samples were analysed
telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx) concentrations in the           for Ca, Mg (flame photometry) and P (spectral photometry)
serum, was analysed using a canine-specific ELISA kit (CTX-1           content, with these data used to determine the urinary fractional
ELISA; IDS).                                                          excretion of these minerals.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
1238                                                           J. Stockman et al.

   Faeces were stored frozen at –20°C in a sealed container until          study in week 27 because of the diagnosis of a hepatic mass on
processing. Each pooled 5 d faecal collection was weighed and              abdominal ultrasound scanning. The dog underwent a sub-
then freeze-dried (One VirTis BenchTop BTP9ES Freeze Dryer;                sequent laparotomy and a partial hepatectomy, which revealed
Biopharma Process Systems). Once dried, the faeces were                    a benign hyperplastic mass. All other dogs were assessed as
weighed again and manually homogenised in a mortar and                     healthy and free of any clinical signs of adverse dietary effects
pestle. Any foreign bodies, such as rocks and plant material, were         during the entire duration of the study. BW (ControlBaseline 27·3
removed and weighed separately. A 50 g aliquot of the homo-                (95 % CI 24·7, 29·9) kg, ControlEnd 27·0 (95 % CI 24·5, 29·6) kg;
genate was sent for laboratory analysis, which included fat,               TestBaseline 27·2 (95 % CI 25·0, 29·5) kg, TestEnd 27·2 (95 % CI
protein, DM, organic matter, fibre, ash, Ca, P, Zn and Mg analysis.         24·9, 29·5) kg; P = 1·000) and energetic intake (ControlBaseline
Apparent protein, fat, DM and mineral digestibility were calcu-            418 (95 % CI 347, 490) kJ/kg0·75, ControlEnd 397 (95 % CI
lated as the difference between the dietary intake and faecal              331, 469) kJ/kg0·75; TestBaseline 448 (95 % CI 385, 510) kJ/kg0·75,
content over the 5 collection days and expressed as percentage             TestEnd 452 (95 % CI 385, 515) kJ/kg0·75; P = 1·000) were
of the intake. The total mineral balance (g) was also calculated           not significantly different between the groups at any time.
for Ca, P and Mg as intake − (faecal excretion + urinary excretion).       Following the baseline period, Ca intake was 200 (SD 26) mg/kg
                                                                           BW0·75 per d for the Control group and 881 (SD 145) mg/kg
Urine mineral content and relative super saturation                        BW0·75 per d in the Test group.
                                                                              All of the health-related measures (e.g. haematology, serum
All passed urine was collected over a 5 d period. The method
                                                                           biochemistry) remained within normal ranges throughout
for urine relative super saturation (RSS) analysis has been pre-
                                                                           the study and none showed consistent significant differences
viously described(13). Samples were analysed for oxalate,
                                                                           between the groups (P > 0·05). iCa concentrations were not
citrate, pyrophosphate, K, Ca, Na, ammonium, chloride, sul-
                                                                           different between groups before the intervention (Control 1·21
phate and phosphate via HPLC. The concentrations of analytes
                                                                           (95 % CI 1·18, 1·25) mmol/l; Test 1·23 (95 % CI 1·20, 1·26) mmol/l;
were then used by SUPERSAT software (Institute of Urology
                                                                           P = 0·995). Although there was a tendency for iCa concentrations
and Nephrology, University College) to calculate the RSS
                                                                           to be lower in the Test group compared with the Control group
(activity product/solubility product) for struvite and Ca oxalate.
                                                                           at week 8 (Control 1·27 (95 % CI 1·21, 1·33) mmol/l; Test 1·20
This analysis is carried out at the Royal Canin SAS European
                                                                           (95 % CI 1·17, 1·23) mmol/l; P = 0·065), no significant differences
Regional Laboratory in Aimargues, France.
                                                                           over time (P > 0·05) or between groups (P > 0·05) were apparent
                                                                           throughout the study.
Statistical analysis
Power analyses by simulation were performed for the primary
                                                                           Imaging
response variable (the percentage difference in intake and
excreted Ca levels (mg/kg0·75). Data from a previous study(5)              Of the seventeen dogs that completed the study, one dog was
evaluating faecal Ca excretion were used to estimate the                   radiographed on the three initial occasions, but only underwent
between-dog variability to enable simulation of data sets. Using           ultrasonographic examinations for the subsequent three time
this methodology, it was found that ten dogs were needed in the            points because of concerns over response to sedation. No
Test group when using eight dogs in the Control group to detect            evidence of urolithiasis or soft tissue mineralisation was detec-
a 6 % reduction, from a baseline of 12 %, in the percentage dif-           ted on any occasion using either modality. Ultrasound scans
ference in percentage retention of Ca with at least 80 % power.            highlighted mild pyelectasia in eleven of the dogs (seven from
   Data are presented as means with 95 % CI. The data were                 the Control group, four from the Test group) on a single
analysed using linear mixed effects models with each measure as            occasion during the study; however, this finding was transient
the response. Fixed effects of diet, sampling occasion and their           and was not evident in follow-up scans.
interaction, and a random effect of dog, to account for the repeat
measurements, were examined. Three sets of hypothesis tests
                                                                           Renal and urinary health
were performed: first, the difference between groups at each of
the six sampling occasions; second, the change from baseline of            Serum creatinine and urea were not significantly different
each time point within each diet group; and finally, the difference         between the groups at any time point or over time, with the
in the change from baseline between diet groups. All analyses              exception of week 40 when both were significantly higher in
were performed using R version 3.2.0 with the lme4 and mult-               the Control group (Table 2; P = 0·005). GFR calculated using the
comp libraries, and the hypothesis tests were corrected for                iohexol clearance method (Fig. 1) was reduced compared with
multiplicity to control the family-wise error rate to a level of 5 %.      baseline in both groups until 32 weeks (P < 0·05), with no
                                                                           differences apparent between the two groups at any time point
                                                                           (P > 0·05). Urine-specific gravity and the urinary albumin:
Results                                                                    creatinine ratio did not change during the study or show
                                                                           significant differences between the groups on any occasion. RSS
General health data
                                                                           for both calcium oxalate and for magnesium ammonium
Of the eighteen Labrador Retrievers initially included, seven-             triphosphate (struvite) did not show significant differences in
teen completed the full 56 weeks of the study. One female                  the between groups change from baseline (Table 2). There was
(aged 8·2 years) from the Test diet group was removed from the             no evidence of urinary tract disease in any dog during the study.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
                                                                                  High calcium intake in adult dogs                                                 1239

                            Table 2. Renal and urinary health measures*
                            (Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)

                                                                        Control                                           Test

                            Weeks                          Mean                      95 % CI                 Mean                  95 % CI                 P

                            Serum creatinine (µmol/l)
                              Baseline                112·4                        104·0,   121·5          112·2                 104·7,   120·3          1·000
                              8                       114·5                        105·9,   123·7          108·8                 101·5,   116·7          0·883
                              16                      116·1                        107·4,   125·5          115·3                 107·6,   123·6          1·000
                              24                      116·6                        107·9,   126·0          112·5                 104·9,   120·6          0·987
                              32                      122·9                        113·7,   132·9          112·1                 104·4,   120·4          0·193
                              40                      131·1                        121·3,   141·6          113·3                 105·5,   121·6          0·005
                            Serum urea (mmol/l)
                              Baseline                  5·8                          5·1,   6·7               6·5                  5·7,   7·3            0·800
                              8                         5·5                          4·8,   6·4               5·0                  4·4,   5·7            0·787
                              16                        6·2                          5·4,   7·2               5·7                  5·0,   6·4            0·851
                              24                        6·3                          5·5,   7·3               5·8                  5·1,   6·5            0·902
                              32                        6·2                          5·4,   7·2               5·7                  5·0,   6·4            0·859
                              40                        6·5                          5·7,   7·5               5·3                  4·7,   6·0            0·058
                            Urine-specific gravity
                              Baseline                  1·023                      1·010,   1·035             1·026              1·015,   1·037          1·000
                              8                         1·018                      1·005,   1·030             1·020              1·008,   1·031          1·000
                              16                        1·022                      1·010,   1·035             1·020              1·009,   1·031          1·000
                              24                        1·024                      1·011,   1·036             1·015              1·004,   1·026          0·844
                              32                        1·017                      1·004,   1·029             1·010              0·999,   1·022          0·977
                              40                        1·019                      1·006,   1·031             1·018              1·006,   1·029          1·000
                            Urine RSS struvite
                              8                         2·50                        0·44,   14·10             0·15                0·03,   0·73           0·015
                              16                        1·83                        0·32,   10·31             0·18                0·04,   0·84           0·078
                              24                        1·25                        0·22,   7·07              0·30                0·06,   1·41           0·651
                              32                        1·30                        0·23,   7·31              0·10                0·02,   0·49           0·039
                              40                        0·49                        0·09,   2·74              0·12                0·02,   0·58           0·672
                              48                        0·21                        0·04,   1·17              0·34                0·07,   1·65           1·000
                            Urine RSS calcium oxalate
                              8                         2·58                        1·03,   6·43              2·07                0·92,   4·70           1·000
                              16                        3·61                        1·45,   8·99              2·04                0·90,   4·62           0·909
                              24                        2·18                        0·87,   5·43              1·71                0·75,   3·86           1·000
                              32                        2·59                        1·04,   6·46              1·54                0·67,   3·56           0·951
                              40                        2·80                        1·12,   6·98              3·28                1·42,   7·55           1·000
                              48                        2·36                        0·95,   5·89              3·16                1·37,   7·29           0·999

                            RSS, relative super saturation.
                            * P values represent comparison between groups at the given time point.

                         2.50                                                                         different between the Control and the Test groups in any of the
                                                                                                      measurements (Table 3). Similarly, bone formation (BAP; P > 0·05)
                                                                                                      and bone resorption markers (serum CTx; P > 0·05) as well as the
                         2.25
                                                                                                      measured hormones and vitamin D metabolites (PTH, fibroblast
   GFR (ml/kg per min)

                                                                                                      growth factor 23 (FGF23), calcidiol and calcitriol) were not signi-
                                                                                                      ficantly different between the groups at any time point (Table 3).
                         2.00

                                                                                                      Mineral balance and apparent digestibility
                         1.75
                                                                                                      There was no difference in faecal Ca excretion between the
                                                                                                      groups at baseline (P = 0·913). Ingestion of the Test diet resulted
                         1.50                                                                         in a 3·3-fold elevation in faecal Ca excretion for the remainder
                                Baseline    8         16           24      32         40
                                                                                                      of the study (P < 0·001), with no change apparent in the Control
                                                           Weeks
                                                                                                      group (Fig. 2(a)). Urinary Ca excretion was increased in the Test
Fig. 1. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured throughout the study in both                        group at weeks 8, 16, 24 and 40 (Fig. 2(a); P < 0·05), although
the Control (    ) and the Test (       ) groups. Values are means and 95 % CI.                       urinary Ca losses remained considerably lower than those
                                                                                                      measured in the faeces. Consequently, total Ca balance was not
                                                                                                      significantly different from 0 at any time point in either group
Bone health and related hormones
                                                                                                      (Fig. 2(b)). The estimated difference between groups in the
DXA measurements for bone mineralisation including BMD                                                change in Ca balance over the duration of the study was 0·85
(g/cm2; P > 0·05) and BMC (g; P > 0·05) were not significantly                                         (95 % CI –1·67, 3·36) g (P = 0·983). A linear regression of dietary
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
1240                                                                   J. Stockman et al.

           Table 3. Bone measures and related hormones*
           (Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)

                                                        Control                                               Test

           Weeks                           Mean                     95 % CI                    Mean                     95 % CI                      P

           DXA BMC (g)
             Baseline                     965                      838, 1110                  939                      828, 1065                  0·999
             24                           937                      815, 1078                  927                      817, 1050                  1·000
             40                           961                      836, 1106                  956                      843, 1084                  1·000
           DXA BMD (g/cm2)
             Baseline                        0·99                 0·94, 1·05                     0·99                 0·94, 1·04                  1·000
             24                              1·00                 0·94, 1·06                     1·00                 0·95, 1·06                  1·000
             40                              1·00                 0·94, 1·06                     1·00                 0·95, 1·06                  1·000
           Bone alkaline phosphatase      (UL)
             Baseline                        8·9                   6·9,   11·6                   9·3                   7·3,   11·7                1·000
             8                              11·0                   8·5,   14·3                   9·5                   7·5,   12·0                0·942
             16                              8·2                   6·3,   10·7                   9·6                   7·6,   12·2                0·919
             24                              8·3                   6·4,   10·8                   8·5                   6·7,   10·8                1·000
             32                              9·8                   7·6,   12·8                   9·4                   7·3,   12·0                1·000
             40                              9·9                   7·6,   12·9                   9·1                   7·1,   11·6                0·999
           Serum cross-laps (ng/ml)
             Baseline                        0·83                 0·41,   1·67                   0·48                 0·27,   0·86                0·711
             8                               0·76                 0·38,   1·54                   0·45                 0·25,   0·81                0·758
             16                              0·60                 0·30,   1·21                   0·38                 0·21,   0·68                0·880
             24                              0·72                 0·36,   1·45                   0·53                 0·30,   0·96                0·992
             32                              0·37                 0·19,   0·75                   0·42                 0·23,   0·75                1·000
             40                              0·41                 0·20,   0·82                   0·24                 0·13,   0·43                0·748
           PTH (ng/ml)
             Baseline                       14·2                   9·4,   21·4                  18·3                  12·9,   26·0                0·886
             8                              15·4                  10·4,   22·7                  15·6                  11·0,   22·2                1·000
             16                             17·8                  12·0,   26·2                  18·6                  13·1,   26·4                1·000
             24                             17·3                  11·7,   25·5                  20·8                  14·7,   29·5                0·980
             32                             15·3                  10·4,   22·7                  22·1                  15·4,   31·8                0·487
             40                             18·6                  12·6,   27·4                  20·5                  14·2,   29·5                1·000
           FGF23 (pg/ml)
             Baseline                     377                      305,   466                 486                      402,   587                 0·169
             8                            385                      311,   475                 436                      355,   536                 0·944
             16                           390                      316,   482                 452                      374,   546                 0·827
             24                           362                      293,   447                 432                      356,   524                 0·661
             32                           377                      305,   466                 415                      343,   505                 0·988
             40                           401                      325,   496                 434                      357,   527                 0·998
           Calcidiol (µg/l)
             Baseline                       43·8                  37·8,   50·9                  43·2                  37·8,   49·4                1·000
             8                              39·5                  34·0,   45·8                  36·6                  32·1,   41·9                0·979
             16                             39·5                  34·0,   45·8                  35·0                  30·6,   40·0                0·695
             24                             37·4                  32·2,   43·4                  33·2                  29·0,   37·9                0·709
             32                             40·7                  35·0,   47·3                  34·2                  29·8,   39·2                0·225
             40                             38·4                  33·1,   44·6                  35·6                  31·1,   40·8                0·980
           Calcitriol (µg/l)
             Baseline                       16·7                  12·9,   21·6                  15·7                  12·5,   19·8                1·000
             8                              14·6                  11·2,   18·9                  16·0                  12·5,   20·3                0·999
             16                             15·9                  12·3,   20·6                  16·8                  13·2,   21·3                1·000
             24                             15·0                  11·6,   19·5                  17·6                  13·8,   22·4                0·931
             32                             13·0                  10·0,   16·8                  16·7                  13·1,   21·2                0·457
             40                             13·2                  10·2,   17·1                  16·0                  12·6,   20·4                0·774

           DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; UL, upper intake level; PTH, parathyroid hormone;
              FGF23, fibroblast growth factor 23.
           * P values represent comparison between groups at the given time point.

Ca intake v. faecal Ca excretion throughout the study high-                           on week 40 (P = 0·003), no further differences between groups
lighted that the 95 % confidence regions for both diet groups                          were apparent (all P > 0·05). There were no significant differ-
surround the y–x line, supporting the view that there was no                          ences between the groups in P or Mg digestibility over the
difference in the amount of Ca retained n either the Control or                       duration of the study. During the 8 weeks following transition
the Test diets (Fig. 3).                                                              to the test diet, Zn digestibility was reduced compared with
   Apparent Ca digestibility was not different between groups at                      baseline (Baseline 3·0 (95 % CI –14·3, 20·3) %; week 8 –23·3
the end of baseline-diet feeding (Control 19·3 (95 % CI –1·1,                         (95 % CI –40·6, −6·0); P = 0·026) and was significantly lower
39·7) %; Test 5·0 (95 % CI –2·1, 22·1) %; P = 0·782). With the                        than that in the Control group at the same time point
exception of Ca digestibility being elevated in the Control group                     (P = 0·009). This response was transient, with no differences
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
                                                                                 High calcium intake in adult dogs                                                1241

    (a)                     12.5                                                                    for a transient fall in protein digestibility during the initial
                                                                                                    8 weeks of test diet feeding (Control 85·8 (95 % CI 83·0, 88·6) %;
                             10                                                                     Test 80·6 (95 % CI 78·1, 83·1) %; P = 0·059), there was no
                                                                                                    significant change in energy, protein or fat digestibility or any
      Ca excretion (g/d)

                             7.5                                                                    differences between groups throughout the remainder of the

                                                                                         Faecal
                                                                                                    study (P > 0·05). From week 8, there was a significant reduction
                              5
                                                                                                    in DM digestibility apparent in the high-Ca diet group (78·2
                                                                                                    (95 % CI 76·1, 80·4) %) when compared with the Control group
                             2.5
                                                                                                    (88·2 (95 % CI 85·8, 90·6) %; P < 0·001). This response remained
                                                                                                    until the end of the trial.

                                                                                         Urinary
                           0.015
                           0.005

                                    Baseline    8      16           24     32      40               Discussion
                                                            Weeks
                                                                                                    The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of feeding a
    (b)                                                                                             high-Ca diet on markers of health and Ca balance in adult dogs.
                              2                                                                     Although concerns have been raised regarding the long-term
                                                                                                    feeding of Ca excess in dogs(4,5,14), the current study showed
                                                                                                    that both the control and the high-Ca diets were well tolerated,
                              1
      Ca balance (g/d)

                                                                                                    and no dogs displayed gastrointestinal signs, reduced food
                                                                                                    intake, failure to maintain ideal body condition or any adverse
                              0                                                                     effects that could be attributed to the diet or to a high mineral
                                                                                                    intake. In addition, there were no consistent differences
                             –1                                                                     between the Test and the Control groups in any measured
                                                                                                    haematological and biochemical parameters, urinalysis, or GFR,
                                                                                                    which could indicate clinical or sub clinical negative effects as a
                             –2
                                   Baseline     8      16           24      32     40               result of a high Ca intake. It should be noted that one of the
                                                            Weeks                                   dogs in the Test group was removed from the study in week 27
                                                                                                    because of the ultrasonographic diagnosis of a hepatic mass.
Fig. 2. Faecal and urinary Ca excretion (a) and Ca balance (b) throughout the
study in both the Control (      ) and the Test (       ) groups. Values are                        Histopathology of the mass following excision revealed that the
means and 95 % CI.                                                                                  mass was benign and without evidence of mineralisation or any
                                                                                                    other pathologic finding that could suggest a connection to
                                                                                                    high Ca intake.
                                                                                                       Despite marked differences in dietary Ca intake, iCa
                              1                                                                     remained stable throughout the study and did not differ
   Ca excretion (g/MBW)

                                                                                                    between groups at any time point. Regulation of circulating Ca
                                                                                                    concentrations involves a complex process, reliant on the
                           0.32                                                                     integrated actions of PTH, vitamin D metabolites, calcitonin and
                                                                                                    iCa itself on Ca-sensing receptors expressed in the parathyroid
                                                                                                    gland and the renal tubules of the kidney(1). Increased dietary
                            0.1                                                                     Ca intake results in a reduction in the synthesis and release of
                                                                                                    PTH, which exerts both direct and indirect effects on the
                                                                                                    intestine, kidney and bone. Reduced circulating PTH controls
                           0.03                                                                     the synthesis of calcitriol (1,25 (OH)2-vitamin D) by suppressing
                                   0.1         0.18         0.32         0.56       1               renal 1-α-hydroxylation of calcidiol (25(OH)-vitamin D) derived
                                                      Ca intake (g/MBW)                             from the circulation. Through this response, reduced circulating
Fig. 3. Linear regression between dietary Ca intake and faecal Ca excretion                         calcitriol concentrations will limit Ca absorption from the
(g/kg body weight (BW)0·75; metabolic body weight (MBW)). The 95 % confidence                       intestine, resulting in an increase in faecal Ca excretion. In
regions for both diet groups surround the y–x (       ), supporting the view that                   addition, reductions in PTH and calcitriol, in response to high
there was no difference in the amount of Ca retained in either the Control (    )
or the Test (      ) diets.
                                                                                                    Ca intakes, will suppress osteoclastic bone resorption and
                                                                                                    reduce renal Ca reabsorption. Whereas there was a significant
compared with the baseline or with the Control group during                                         reduction in serum calcitriol concentrations in the Test diet
the remainder of the study (P > 0·05).                                                              group over the course of the study, at no point was this
  No differences in energy (Control 86·4 (95 % CI 83·6, 89·2) %;                                    response different to the corresponding time point in the
Test 83·8 (95 % CI 81·5, 86·2) %; P = 0·434), protein (Control 85·7                                 Control group, suggesting some seasonal variation in this
(95 % CI 82·7, 88·6) %; Test 84·9 (95 % CI 82·4, 87·4) %;                                           metabolite of vitamin D. In addition, a high dietary Ca intake
P = 1·000) or fat (Control 97·5 (95 % CI 96·7, 98·3) %; Test 97·8                                   failed to significantly alter serum PTH concentrations. The lack
(95 % CI 97·1, 98·5) %; P = 1·000) digestibility were apparent                                      of a clear diet effect on these measures is surprising, but it may
between groups during baseline feeding. Despite a tendency                                          be explained by the nutritional adequacy of both diets (e.g. not
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
1242                                                           J. Stockman et al.

sufficiently different to elicit a response) and the similar Ca:P           demonstrate an altered faecal excretion of these minerals or a
ratio (1·6:1) of the control and test diets, or it is possible that        decrease in fat or protein digestibility in the Test group, as might
some adaptation had already occurred during the first 8 weeks               be expected. Similarly, there was no difference in energy intake
that was missed by the first sample time point.                             required to maintain an ideal body condition between the Test
   A high dietary Ca intake resulted in increases in both faecal           and the Control groups. This further supports the conclusion
and urinary Ca excretion, with faecal excretion comprising a               that Ca intake did not significant influence energy or macro-
much greater proportion of overall losses. This observation is             nutrient digestibility. A marked reduction in DM digestibility
consistent with the view that a reduction in intestinal Ca                 was observed following transition to the test diet, with this
absorption is a primary mechanism in the regulation of Ca                  response maintained for the duration of the study in this group;
balance during exposure to excess dietary Ca in mammalian                  this response is most likely driven by the marked difference in
species(1–3). It is worth noting that faecal excretion is comprised        the ash content of the experimental diets (Control 5·2 %, Test
of both unabsorbed dietary Ca, as well as a contribution from              10·7 %; Table 1). It was previously suggested that faecal Ca
endogenous Ca losses. Further research may help identify                   excretion may be negatively associated with dietary DM
whether endogenous losses change in response to marked                     digestibility(18). As such, an increase in Ca absorption could
changes in dietary Ca intake. Ca balance and apparent Ca                   result in a positive Ca balance in diets with very high digest-
digestibility (expressed as a percentage of Ca intake) were not            ibility, such as experimental or home-prepared diets. Com-
significantly different between dogs fed the control or test diets.         mercial dog diets contain raw ingredients and undergo
As Ca balance was not significantly different from zero for either          processing such as extrusion and cooking, which generally limit
diet at any time point, the current results do not support the             DM digestibility, and consequently lower Ca availability. This
hypothesis that dogs are unable to sufficiently adjust Ca                   effect of Ca on diet digestibility may account for the difference
intestinal absorption to account for an increased Ca intake(4).            in the findings of the current study, compared with those pre-
The results of the present study suggest that maintaining Ca               sented in the meta-analysis by Mack et al.(4) where many of
balance is a somewhat variable process as individual dogs had              the diets evaluated were experimental diets. It is also worth
positive or negative balances at different sampling occasions              noting that the studies included in this meta-analysis involved
throughout the trial regardless of diet; this may also represent a         relatively short-term exposure to the experimental diets, and
phased regulation of Ca balance, where small quantities of Ca              that much of the data were drawn from studies feeding Ca
accumulate up to a threshold that triggers excretion to maintain           below minimum requirements, as opposed to intakes compar-
balance over time. As these effects were neither consistent                able with those in the present study.
within diet, or maintained within particular animals over time,               There are a number of factors that must be considered when
overall Ca balance was determined as neutral in both groups,               translating the results of this study into canine diet formulations.
which may hide a more individualised response. It is also worth            First, dietary factors, including dietary content of phytate,
noting that despite a 2·1-fold increase in urinary Ca excretion,           oxalate, fat, the Ca source and the Ca:P ratio are thought to
there was no concurrent increase in the RSS for Ca oxalate.                influence Ca absorption(19); therefore, the diets in the present
Therefore, it would appear that higher Ca intake does not                  study will not represent all possible diet formulations
equate a high risk for Ca oxalate urolithiasis, at least in the range      available in the market. The source of Ca in the current test diet
of intakes studied here.                                                   was provided by a combination of pork meal and supple-
   Previous studies demonstrated that adult dogs exposed to a              mented Ca carbonate. Ca derived from organic raw materials is
low Ca intake (0·5 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal)) for 6 months do not              thought to be less bioavailable than Ca from other sources, but
appear to adjust their fractional Ca excretion, leading to a               there is evidence to suggest that organic and inorganic forms of
negative Ca balance and a resulting mobilisation of bone                   Ca have similar bioavailability in many species(4,20). Finally, the
minerals to maintain Ca homoeostasis(5). In contrast, the present          present study was conducted in a single adult breed (Labrador
study indicates that dogs are able to adequately regulate Ca               Retriever). Previous studies in growing dogs(3,7) have docu-
balance when diets contain levels above minimum require-                   mented that the effects of high-Ca diets vary in dogs of different
ments. Given that several studies have highlighted abnormal                breed sizes and that some implications of high mineral load,
skeletal growth in large- and giant-breed puppies fed diets                such as urolithiasis, are more common in certain breeds(21).
containing ≥5·5 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) Ca(3,7), the present data            Therefore, before generalised recommendations can be made,
suggest a developmental adaptation enabling adult dogs to                  the impact of high Ca intakes should be investigated in
regulate Ca uptake from the gastrointestinal tract, thus limiting          other breeds.
potential long-term health concerns when fed high-Ca diets.                   In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that Ca intakes
This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective, supporting              of up to 7·1 g/4184 kJ (1000 kcal) were well tolerated over a
scavenging behaviours where dogs would have been likely to                 period of 40 weeks, with no adverse effects that could be
rapidly consume large, infrequent meals high in Ca-rich bony               attributed to the diet or to a high mineral intake. These data
material, rather than Ca-deficient foods(15).                               provide evidence that adult dogs are able to tolerate higher Ca
   High dietary Ca has been suggested to cause chelation of fat            intakes than puppies, and this will enable more precise
and decrease absorption of dietary minerals such as P, Zn and              recommendations for a safe Ca upper limit in adult dogs. In
Mg, as demonstrated by studies in humans and rodents(13,16,17).            addition, Ca balance was maintained throughout the study and
The apparent digestibility and mineral balance results did                 was not significantly different from 0 in either group, at any
reveal a transient reduction in Zn digestibility, but failed to            time point. Under the present study conditions, there was no
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 02 Feb 2021 at 14:25:19, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517001210
                                                      High calcium intake in adult dogs                                                   1243

evidence of Ca bioaccumulation, and the data do not indicate              6. National Research Council (US) (2006) Ad Hoc Committee
that high Ca intakes result in persistent reductions in mineral, fat         on Dog and Cat Nutrition. Washington, DC: National
or energy absorption.                                                        Academies Press.
                                                                          7. Dobenecker B, Kasbeitzer N, Flinspach S, et al. (2006)
                                                                             Calcium‐excess causes subclinical changes of bone growth in
                                                                             Beagles but not in Foxhound‐crossbred dogs, as measured in
Acknowledgements                                                             X‐rays. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 90, 394–401.
The authors would like to acknowledge the skills and expertise            8. Whiting SJ & Wood RJ (1997) Adverse effects of high‐calcium
                                                                             diets in humans. Nutr Rev 55, 1–9.
of colleagues at WALTHAM in the care and training of the dogs
                                                                          9. Institute of Medicine (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for
and for the analysis of samples collected throughout the study.              Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National Acade-
The authors recognise the contribution of Jonathan Elliott, Sam              mies Press.
Williams and Ludovic Pelligand (The Royal Veterinary College,            10. American Association of Feed Control Officials (2016)
London) in the analysis and interpretation of the iohexol                    American Association of Feed Control Officials Official Publi-
clearance data. In addition, the authors express their gratitude             cation. Washington, DC: The Association of Feed Control
to Ellen Kienzle and Britta Dobenecker (Ludwig-Maximilians-                  Officials Inc.
                                                                         11. German AJ, Holden SL, Moxham GL, et al. (2006) A simple,
Universität, Munich) for their input on the study design and in
                                                                             reliable tool for owners to assess the body condition of their
analysing and interpreting the mineral digestibility and                     dog or cat. J Nutr 136, 2031S–2033S.
hormone data.                                                            12. Bexfield NH, Heiene R, Gerritsen RJ, et al. (2008) Glomerular
   This work was funded by Mars Petcare. The WALTHAM®                        filtration rate estimated by 3‐sample plasma clearance of
Centre for Pet Nutrition is a fundamental research centre for                iohexol in 118 healthy dogs. J Vet Intern Med 22, 66–73.
Mars Petcare.                                                            13. Wood RJ & Zheng JJ (1997) High dietary calcium intakes
                                                                             reduce zinc absorption and balance in humans. Am J Clin
   J. S., M. G., D. A. and P. J. M. conceived the project. J. S.,
                                                                             Nutr 65, 1803–1809.
P. W., M. G., J. A. and A. C. developed the overall research plan        14. Gagné JW, Wakshlag JJ, Center SA, et al. (2013) Evaluation of
and had study oversight. J. S., M. G. and J. A. conducted the                calcium, phosphorus, and selected trace mineral status in
research. R. H. and A. C. performed the statistical analysis. J. S.          commercially available dry foods formulated for dogs. J Am
and P. W. wrote the paper with M. G., D. A., J. A. and P. J. M.;             Vet Med Assoc 243, 658–666.
P. W. had primary responsibility for the final content.                   15. Bradshaw JWS (2006) The evolutionary basis for the feeding
   J. S., P. W., M. G., D. A., J. A., R. H., A. C. and P. J. M. are          behavior of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats
                                                                             (Felis catus). J Nutr 136, 1927S–1931S.
employees of Mars Petcare.
                                                                         16. Papakonstantinou E, Flatt WP, Huth PJ, et al. (2003) High
                                                                             dietary calcium reduces body fat content, digestibility of fat,
References                                                                   and serum vitamin D in rats. Obes Res 11, 387–394.
                                                                         17. Jacobsen R, Lorenzen JK, Toubro S, et al. (2005) Effect of
 1. de Brito Galvao JF, Nagode LA, Schenck PA, et al. (2013)                 short-term high dietary calcium intake on 24-h energy
    Calcitriol, calcidiol, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast                expenditure, fat oxidation, and fecal fat excretion. Int J Obes
    growth factor‐23 interactions in chronic kidney disease. J Vet           (Lond) 29, 292–301.
    Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 23, 134–162.                           18. Kienzle E, Dobenecker B, Wichert B, et al. (2006) Effect of
 2. Bronner F (2003) Mechanisms of intestinal calcium absorp-                fecal water and dry matter excretion on fecal mineral
    tion. J Cell Biochem 88, 387–393.                                        excretion in dogs studied in a fiber model. J Nutr 136,
 3. Nap RC & Hazewinkel HAW (1994) Growth and skeletal                       2001S–2003S.
    development in the dog in relation to nutrition; a review.           19. Hazewinkel HAW, Van den Brom WE, Van ’ T Klooster AT, et al.
    Vet Q 16, 50–59.                                                         (1991) Calcium metabolism in Great Dane dogs fed diets with
 4. Mack JK, Alexander LG, Morris PJ, et al. (2015) Demonstration            various calcium and phosphorus levels. J Nutr 121, S99–S106.
    of uniformity of calcium absorption in adult dogs and cats.          20. Bao SF, Windisch W & Kirchgessner M (1997) Calcium bioa-
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 99, 801–809.                             vailability of different organic and inorganic dietary Ca sources
 5. Schmitt S, Mack JK, Kienzle E, et al. (2013) No adaptation of            (citrate, lactate, acetate, oyster‐shell, eggshell, β‐tri‐Ca phos-
    apparent digestibility and fecal excretion to low calcium                phate). J Anim Phys Anim Nutr 78, 154–160.
    intake in adult dogs. Proceedings 17th European Society              21. Ling GV, Franti CE, Ruby AL, et al. (1998) Urolithiasis in dogs.
    of Veterinary and Comparative Nutrition Congress, 19–22                  II: breed prevalence, and interrelations of breed, sex, age, and
    September 2013, pp. 30.                                                  mineral composition. Am J Vet Res 59, 630–642.
You can also read