Africans welcome China's influence but maintain democratic aspirations
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Dispatch No. 489 | 15 November 2021 Africans welcome China’s influence but maintain democratic aspirations Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 489 1 | Josephine Appiah-Nyamekye Sanny and Edem Selormey Summary Home to some of the world’s fastest-growing economies (Mitchell, 2019), Africa has attracted the attention of leaders and economic strategists everywhere, including China. Over the past two decades, political and economic relations between China and Africa have grown rapidly, with trade volumes increasing from about $11 billion in 2000 to $192 billion in 2019 (Amoah, Hodzi, & Castillo, 2020; China Africa Research Initiative, 2018; Thomas, 2021). While the United States is still the continent’s largest aid donor, China is the leading provider of financial support for infrastructure development in Africa (Muchira, 2018; Shepherd & Blanchard, 2018). However, China’s investments and dealings with Africa have been a topic of widespread scrutiny and debate. Because China’s financial support for Africa is often in the form of long-term loans rather than grants, it has been criticized as a “debt trap” that China may use to gain strategic advantages on the continent (Green, 2019). Some argue that African countries that borrow from China may lose key assets if they are unable to pay back their loans (Brautigam, 2019; Brautigam & Kidane, 2020; Sun, 2014). Others are concerned that China is using its influence to promote its political ideas on the continent (Scott, 2021). How do ordinary Africans perceive China’s engagement with their countries and economies? Afrobarometer’s national surveys in 34 African countries in 2019/2021 show that Africans hold positive views of China’s assistance and influence on the continent, though its perceived level of influence on African economies has waned over the past five years. Positive views of China’s influence do not appear to affect Africans’ attitudes toward democracy. China remains second to the United States as the preferred development model for Africans. And majorities of those who are aware of Chinese loans and development assistance to their countries are concerned about being heavily indebted to China. Afrobarometer surveys Afrobarometer is a pan-African, nonpartisan survey research network that provides reliable data on African experiences and evaluations of democracy, governance, and quality of life. Eight rounds of surveys have been completed in up to 39 countries since 1999. Round 8 surveys (2019/2021) cover 34 countries. Afrobarometer conducts face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent’s choice. 1 An earlier version of this dispatch, based on data from 18 countries surveyed before the COVID-19 pandemic forced a pause in Round 8 fieldwork, was published as Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 407. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 1
Afrobarometer conducts face-to-face interviews in the language of the respondent’s choice with nationally representative samples that yield country-level results with margins of error of +/-2 to +/-3 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. This 34-country analysis is based on 48,084 interviews (see Appendix Table A.1 for a list of countries and fieldwork dates). The data are weighted to ensure nationally representative samples. When reporting multi-country averages, all countries are weighted equally (rather than in proportion to population size). Due to rounding, reported totals may differ by 1 percentage point from the sum of sub-categories. Key findings On average across 34 countries, China trails the United States as Africans’ preferred development model (33% vs. 22%), followed by South Africa (12%) and former colonial powers (11%). o The United States ranks at the top in 23 of 34 surveyed countries, while China is No. 1 in five countries: Benin, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Botswana. o While the overall averages have changed little over the past five years, some countries record substantial changes, including Benin (a 21-percentage-point increase in preference for China) and Liberia (an 18-point increase in preference for the United States). Almost two-thirds (63%) of Africans say the economic and political influence of China in their country is “somewhat positive” or “very positive,” while only about one in seven (14%) consider it negative. Views on U.S. influence are almost identical (60% vs. 13%). o On average across 30 countries surveyed in both 2014/2015 and 2019/2021, positive views of China’s political and economic influence have not changed significantly. While a majority (59%) of Africans say China’s economic activities in their country have “some” or “a lot” of influence on their economy, that proportion has declined sharply over the past five years (from 71%). o Perceptions of Chinese influence declined in 24 countries, including huge drops in Sierra Leone (-37 percentage points), Zimbabwe (-29 points), Botswana (-24 points), Malawi (-21 points), Niger (-21 points), and Mali (-20 points). Among the 47% of African citizens who are aware of Chinese loans or development assistance to their country, a majority (57%) say their government has borrowed too much money from China. Views on whether China or the United States is preferable as a development model do not appear to affect Africans’ support for democracy or democratic norms. Seven in 10 Africans (69%) say English is the most important international language for young people to learn. Only 3% prefer Chinese. Best model for development Afrobarometer asks Africans which country provides the best model for the future development of their own country. As in the 2014/2015 survey (Lekorwe, Chingwete, Okuru, & Samson, 2016), China ranks second across 34 countries in 2019/2021, trailing the United States (22% vs. 33%) (Figure 1). About one in 10 respondents cite South Africa (12%) or their former Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 2
colonial power (Britain, France, Portugal, or Germany) (11%), while 7% say they should follow their own country’s model. Figure 1: Best model for development | 34 countries | 2019/2021 United States 33 China 22 South Africa 12 Former colonial power 11 Ethiopia 2 Other countries 4 None of these/There is no role model 2 We should follow our own country’s 7 model 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? In 23 of the 34 countries, citizens prefer the U.S. model to China’s, including large gaps in Liberia (77 percentage points), Sierra Leone (40 points), Morocco (34 points), Angola (28 points), Cabo Verde (27 points), the Gambia (24 points), and Zimbabwe (20 points) (Figure 2). China outstrips the United States in five of the 34 countries: Benin (by 23 percentage points), Mali (23 points), Burkina Faso (19 points), Niger (4 points), and Botswana (4 points). Tanzania, Senegal, Tunisia, Eswatini, Malawi, and Mozambique show equal preference for both models. Given that China is the newcomer in this global competition, it is notable that younger Africans are more likely than their elders to favor the U.S. model (36% of those aged 18-25 vs. 26% of those over age 55), while regard for the Chinese model is fairly steady across all age groups (Figure 3). Men and women are equally likely to prefer the United States, but more men than women prefer China (25% vs. 19%). Respondents’ education level and experience with poverty 2 seem to make only a modest difference in their preferred development model. 2 Afrobarometer’s Lived Poverty Index (LPI) measures respondents’ levels of material deprivation by asking how often they or their families went without basic necessities (enough food and water, medical care, enough cooking fuel, and a cash income) during the preceding year. For more on lived poverty, see Mattes (2020). Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 3
Figure 2: Best model for development: China vs. U.S. | 34 countries | 2019/2021 Benin 47 24 Burkina Faso 40 21 Mali 39 15 Tanzania 35 32 Ethiopia 31 45 Senegal 30 29 Nigeria 29 36 Côte d'Ivoire 29 33 Togo 26 39 Botswana 26 22 Guinea 26 34 Niger 25 21 Gabon 24 32 Sudan 24 35 Kenya 23 42 Cameroon 23 29 Zambia 22 31 34-country average 22 33 Uganda 22 41 Mozambique 22 24 Malawi 20 22 Lesotho 20 27 South Africa 20 37 Tunisia 19 19 Ghana 19 37 Mauritius 16 23 Morocco 16 50 Gambia 15 40 Cabo Verde 15 42 Sierra Leone 14 54 Namibia 11 18 Angola 10 38 Zimbabwe 9 29 Liberia 8 85 Eswatini 6 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% China United States Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 4
Figure 3: Best model for development: China vs. U.S. | by socio-demographic group | 34 countries | 2019/2021 Women 19 33 Men 25 33 Rural 22 31 Urban 23 34 18-25 years 22 36 26-35 years 23 34 36-45 years 23 32 46-55 years 21 31 56 years and above 21 26 No formal education 22 28 Primary 21 33 Secondary 22 35 China Post-secondary 25 34 U.S No lived poverty 20 33 Low lived poverty 23 33 Moderate lived poverty 23 32 High lived poverty 23 33 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? On average across the 31 countries in which this question was asked in both 2014/2015 and 2019/2021, preferences for China and the United States as the best model for development remain largely unchanged, though the U.S. advantage increased marginally from 6 to 9 percentage points. A few countries, however, recorded substantial changes. Benin and Burkina Faso show increases of 21 and 20 percentage points, respectively, in preference for China, while Cameroon, Eswatini, and Liberia record significant decreases (-25, -17, and -17 percentage points, respectively) (Figure 4). As for the U.S. model, preference doubled in Lesotho (from 14% to 27%) and increased sharply in Liberia (by 18 percentage points), Morocco (+16 points), and Sierra Leone (+11 points) while decreasing in nine other countries, including Eswatini (-15 points) and Cabo Verde (-10 points) (Figure 5). Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 5
Figure 4: China as the best model for development | 16 countries | 2014-2021 Benin 26 47 Burkina Faso 20 40 Mali 36 39 Tanzania 35 35 Senegal 28 30 Nigeria 25 29 Côte d'Ivoire 26 29 Togo 19 26 Botswana 24 26 Guinea 22 26 Niger 28 25 Gabon 29 24 Sudan 36 24 Kenya 24 23 Cameroon 48 23 31-country average 25 23 Zambia 32 22 Uganda 19 22 Mozambique 36 22 Malawi 17 20 18 2014/2015 Lesotho 20 South Africa 26 2019/2021 20 Tunisia 24 19 Ghana 15 19 Mauritius 13 16 Morocco 10 16 Cabo Verde 21 15 Sierra Leone 18 14 Namibia 22 11 Zimbabwe 20 9 Liberia 25 8 Eswatini 23 6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? (% who say China) Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 6
Figure 5: U.S. as the best model for development | 31 countries | 2014-2021 Liberia 67 85 Sierra Leone 43 54 Morocco 34 50 Cabo Verde 52 42 Kenya 49 42 Uganda 41 41 Togo 33 39 Ghana 37 37 South Africa 36 37 Nigeria 43 36 Sudan 26 35 Guinea 39 34 Côte d'Ivoire 33 33 Gabon 30 32 Tanzania 30 32 31-country average 31 32 Zambia 23 31 Cameroon 20 29 Senegal 33 29 Zimbabwe 25 29 Lesotho 14 27 2014/2015 Mozambique 15 24 Benin 18 24 2019/2021 Mauritius 22 23 Botswana 30 22 Malawi 24 22 Niger 24 21 Burkina Faso 28 21 Tunisia 21 19 Namibia 21 18 Mali 19 15 Eswatini 20 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In your opinion, which of the following countries, if any, would be the best model for the future development of our country, or is there some other country in Africa or elsewhere that should be our model? (% who say United States) Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 7
External influences China’s economic and political influence in Africa, like that of the United States, is far more widely seen as a good than a bad thing. On average, almost two-thirds (63%) of Africans say China’s influence in their country is “somewhat positive” or “very positive,” while only about one in seven (14%) consider it negative. Views on U.S. influence are about the same (60% vs. 13%) (Figure 6). Pluralities welcome the influence of their regional superpower (52%), their former colonial power (46%), and Russia (35%). Positive assessments also far outnumber negative views of the influence of United Nations agencies (57% vs. 11%), regional organizations (57% vs. 12%), and the African Union (53% vs. 14%). Figure 6: External influences: positive or negative? | 34 countries | 2019/2021 China 63 23 14 United States 60 28 13 Regional super power 52 31 17 Former colonial power 46 29 25 Russia 35 48 17 United Nations agencies 57 32 11 Regional alliance 57 31 12 African Union 53 33 14 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Somewhat positive/Very positive Refused/Don't know/Neither Somewhat negative/Very negative Respondents were asked: In general, do you think that the economic and political influence of each of the following countries/organizations on [your country] is mostly positive, mostly negative, or haven’t you heard enough to say? Respondents who feel positively about the influence of China are more likely to hold positive views of U.S. influence as well – i.e. the two views are strongly and positively correlated. This suggests that for many Africans, U.S.-China “competition” may not be an either-or proposition, but a win-win. However, we see differences within countries. In 16 of the 34 countries, China’s influence is more widely seen as positive than that of the U.S., including a 36-percentage-point gap in Eswatini (82% positive for China, 46% for the U.S.), a 25-point gap in Mauritius (75% vs. 50%), and a 19-point gap in Mali (81% vs. 62%) (Figure 7). The U.S. is more widely perceived as having positive influence than China in 10 countries, but Zimbabwe is the only country with a two-digit gap (48% for the U.S. vs. 38% for China). Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 8
Figure 7: Positive influence: China vs. U.S. | 34 countries | 2019/2021 Benin 88 79 Cabo Verde 85 85 Eswatini 82 46 Mali 81 62 Burkina Faso 80 71 Morocco 80 85 Liberia 79 88 Guinea 79 74 Mauritius 75 50 Tanzania 75 63 Côte d'Ivoire 71 66 Mozambique 68 64 Niger 68 60 Sudan 66 56 Kenya 65 72 Cameroon 64 56 Togo 64 71 Nigeria 63 63 34-country average 63 60 Zambia 60 60 Senegal 59 53 Botswana 59 51 Ethiopia 59 63 Gabon 57 51 Lesotho 55 56 Uganda 54 58 Gambia 53 52 Malawi 51 52 Ghana 48 56 China 47 U.S. Namibia 56 Angola 44 46 Sierra Leone 43 46 South Africa 40 48 Zimbabwe 38 48 Tunisia 30 23 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: Do you think that the economic and political influence of each of the following countries on [your country] is mostly positive, mostly negative, or haven’t you heard enough to say? (% who say “somewhat positive” or “very positive”) Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 9
On average across 30 countries in which this question was asked in both 2014/2015 and 2019/2021, the perceived positive influence of China has not changed significantly (66% vs. 63%). Seventeen countries record declines, including steep drops in Gabon (-21 percentage points), Namibia (-19 points), Cameroon (-16 points), and Niger (-16 points). Only six countries show significant increases in the proportion of citizens who see Chinese influence as positive: Morocco (+45 percentage points), Benin (+18 points), Ghana (+14 points), Lesotho (+7 points), Cabo Verde (+4 points), and Tanzania (+4 points) (Figure 8). Despite these declines, majorities in 27 of 34 countries surveyed in 2019/2021 hold positive views of China’s economic and political influence, reaching 88% in Benin, 85% in Cabo Verde, 82% in Eswatini, 81% in Mali, and 80% in Burkina Faso and Mali. Positive assessments of China’s influence are in the minority in seven countries, most strikingly in Tunisia (30%). Figure 8: Changes in perceived positive influence of China (percentage points) | 30* countries | 2014-2021 45 Morocco 18 Benin 14 Ghana 7 Lesotho 7 Cabo Verde 4 Tanzania 3 Sudan 3 Mozambique 3 Mauritius 3 Guinea 2 Burkina Faso 1 Malawi -2 Liberia -3 30-country average -4 Uganda -4 Nigeria -6 Senegal -6 Côte d'Ivoire -8 Togo -10 Zimbabwe -11 South Africa -11 Mali -11 Kenya -12 Zambia -12 Tunisia -12 Sierra Leone -15 Botswana -16 Niger -16 Cameroon -19 Namibia -21 Gabon -40 -20 0 20 40 60 Figure shows the change, in percentage points, between 2014/2015 and 2019/2021 in the proportion of respondents who say China’s economic and political influence on their country is “somewhat positive” or “very positive.” *Question was not asked in Eswatini in 2014/2015. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 10
Positive perceptions of Chinese and U.S. influence follow similar patterns across key socio- demographic groups. For both countries, men and highly educated citizens are somewhat more likely than women and less educated citizens to see the influence as positive (Figure 9). Figure 9: Perceived positive influence of China and U.S. | by socio-demographic group | 34 countries | 2019/2021 Women 59 56 Men 66 63 Rural 62 58 Urban 64 61 No formal education 58 55 Primary 60 57 Secondary 64 62 Post-secondary 69 64 No lived poverty 66 62 Low lived poverty 65 61 Moderate lived poverty 61 59 High lived poverty 61 58 China 18-25 years 63 U.S. 61 26-35 years 63 61 36-45 years 63 61 46-55 years 63 58 56 years and above 59 53 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In general, do you think that the economic and political influence of each of the following countries/organizations on [your country] is mostly positive, mostly negative, or haven’t you heard enough to say? (% who say “somewhat positive” or “very positive”) While views of China’s economic and political influence are largely favorable, assessments of how much influence China’s economic activities have in African countries have dropped sharply. On average across 34 countries, 59% say China’s economic activities in their country have “some” or “a lot” of influence on their economy. But this reflects a major decrease over the past five years, from 71% to 59% across 30 countries surveyed in both 2014/2015 and 2019/2021. Perceptions of the influence of China’s economic activities declined in 24 of these 30 countries, including huge drops in Sierra Leone (-37 percentage points), Zimbabwe (-29 points), Botswana (-24 points), Malawi (-21 points), Niger (-21 points), and Mali (-20 points) (Figure 10). Only Morocco and Mauritius record significant increases in China’s perceived economic influence. The proportions who see China’s economic activities as influential still exceed two-thirds in Morocco (80%), Cabo Verde (77%), Mauritius (75%), Eswatini (74%), Benin (73%), Gabon (73%), Kenya (72%), Cameroon (72%), Sudan (71%), and Mali (70%). But fewer than half of Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 11
citizens agree in Ethiopia (47%), Uganda (44%), Zimbabwe (39%), Malawi (38%), and Sierra Leone (21%). Figure 10: Extent of China’s influence | 34 countries | 2014-2021 Morocco 49 80 Cabo Verde 78 77 Mauritius 69 75 Eswatini 74 Benin 70 73 Gabon 87 73 Kenya 75 72 Cameroon 81 72 Sudan 70 71 Mali 90 70 Tanzania 71 64 Guinea 72 62 Tunisia 74 61 Namibia 76 61 Zambia 75 61 Liberia 68 61 Senegal 73 60 Burkina Faso 77 60 30-country average 71 59 34-country average 59 Niger 80 59 South Africa 69 55 Nigeria 67 55 Togo 71 53 Côte d'Ivoire 70 53 Ghana 61 53 Botswana 76 52 Angola 52 Gambia 2014/2015 51 Lesotho 61 2019/2021 50 Mozambique 68 50 Ethiopia 47 Uganda 57 44 Zimbabwe 68 39 Malawi 59 38 Sierra Leone 58 21 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: How much influence do you think China’s economic activities in [our country] have on our economy, or haven’t you heard enough to say? (% who say “some” or “a lot”) Question was not asked in Eswatini in 2014/2015. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 12
Views on development assistance from China Between 2000 and 2019, China granted loans of about $153 billion to African countries (Pairault, 2021). In spite of China’s increasing investments and support, fewer than half (47%) of Africans are aware that China gives loans or development assistance to their countries (Figure 11). Awareness of such funds varies from more than two-thirds in Kenya (74%), Mauritius (70%), and Cabo Verde (68%) to fewer than one-third in Sierra Leone (30%), Morocco (28%), Nigeria (28%), and Tunisia (24%). Figure 11: Heard of Chinese loans/development assistance | 33* countries | 2019/2021 Kenya 74 13 Mauritius 70 10 Cabo Verde 68 25 Ghana 60 23 Mali 59 25 Benin 58 37 Liberia 56 32 Guinea 55 36 Gabon 55 39 Zambia 54 17 Angola 53 24 Namibia 53 21 Gambia 51 24 Lesotho 51 15 Côte d'Ivoire 51 38 Cameroon 49 30 Sudan 48 29 Senegal 47 22 33-country average 47 27 Malawi 47 18 Ethiopia 46 25 Togo 43 31 Uganda 42 13 Burkina Faso 41 37 Botswana 38 17 Mozambique 36 47 South Africa 36 24 Niger 36 35 Zimbabwe 34 16 Tanzania 31 27 Sierra Leone 30 26 Morocco 28 46 Nigeria 28 33 Tunisia 24 28 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Aware of Chinese loans/aid Not aware of Chinese loans/aid Respondents were asked: To your knowledge, does China give loans or development assistance to our country’s government, or haven’t you had a chance to hear about this? *Question was not asked in Eswatini. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 13
Among citizens who are aware that their countries receive loans or development assistance from China, a plurality (41%) think China attaches “somewhat fewer” or “far fewer” conditions to its assistance than other countries. A quarter (24%) think Chinese assistance comes with more strings attached, while 35% say they “don’t know” or refused to answer the question (Figure 12). Figure 12: Conditionalities on loans/assistance | 33* countries | 2019/2021 100% 21 80% 24 60% 14 40% 69 20% 41 21 0% Senegal Benin Niger Lesotho Mauritius Burkina Faso Uganda Ethiopia Zambia Tunisia Morocco Sierra Leone Mozambique Zimbabwe Côte d'Ivoire Liberia Angola Gabon Mali Guinea Kenya Tanzania Malawi Cabo Verde Namibia Togo Cameroon Sudan Botswana Gambia Nigeria South Africa Ghana 33-country average Somewhat/Far fewer requirements About the same number of requirements Somewhat/Many more requirements Don't know/Refused Respondents who said they are aware of Chinese loans or development assistance were asked: When the government of China gives loans or development assistance to [our country], do you think they put more requirements or fewer requirements on our government compared to other donor countries, or haven’t you heard enough to say? (Note: Respondents who are not aware of Chinese loans or development assistance are excluded.) *Question was not asked in Eswatini. About three-quarters (75%) of those who are aware that their countries receive loans or development assistance from China are also aware that their governments will likely be required to repay loans (Figure 13). Except for Lesotho, majorities in all surveyed countries are aware of this obligation, including about nine in 10 citizens in Kenya (92%), Guinea (89%), Uganda (88%), Ghana (87%), and Zambia (87%). And a majority (57%) of those aware of China’s assistance say their countries have borrowed too much from China. Kenyans (87%), Namibians (79%), Zambians (77%), and Angolans (75%) are particularly concerned about their government’s indebtedness to China, while only three in 10 Tanzanians (29%), Sierra Leoneans (30%), and Batswana (32%) express such concerns. This suggests that the U.S. government and other development partners may be meeting with some success in their efforts to remind Africans that even if money from China and other non-traditional development partners comes with fewer strings, they are in danger of being lured into a deepening debt trap. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 14
Figure 13: Views on loans/development assistance from China | 33* countries | 2019/2021 Kenya 92 87 Guinea 89 63 Uganda 88 67 Ghana 87 69 Zambia 87 77 Nigeria 84 57 Togo 83 56 Mali 82 43 Gabon 82 58 Angola 82 75 Mauritius 81 45 Côte d'Ivoire 80 47 Niger 79 59 Ethiopia 79 63 Morocco 78 55 Senegal 77 66 Namibia 77 79 Burkina Faso 77 38 South Africa 76 68 33-country average 75 57 Benin 74 50 Gambia 74 57 Cameroon 71 62 Malawi 71 56 Tanzania 71 29 Sudan 70 Government is 64 required to repay Cabo Verde 67 56 China for loans Sierra Leone 65 30 Mozambique 60 53 Government has Tunisia 60 borrowed too 42 Zimbabwe 58 much money from 50 58 China Botswana 32 Liberia 54 48 Lesotho 38 48 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents who said they are aware of Chinese loans or development assistance were asked: Do you think that our government is required to repay China for the loans and development assistance it provides to [our country]? Do you think our government has borrowed too much money from China? (Note: Respondents who are not aware of Chinese loans or development assistance are excluded.) *Question was not asked in Eswatini. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 15
Do views on China affect African attitudes toward democracy? Views on whether China or the United States is preferable as a development model do not appear to have any significant effect on Africans’ support for democracy or democratic norms. Respondents who prefer China as a developmental model are just as likely as those who prefer the U.S. model to favor democracy over other kinds of governance systems (70% vs. 72%) (Figure 14). They are also equally likely to reject one-party rule, endorse presidential term limits, support elections as the best way to choose their country’s leaders, support multiparty competition, and prioritize an accountable government over an efficient one. Figure 14: Support for democratic norms and institutions | by preference for China or U.S. as development model | 34 countries | 2019/2021 100% 79 80 78 79 80% 75 77 72 70 63 64 63 60 60% 40% 20% 0% Reject one- Support Elections are Support Support Prefer party rule presidential best way to democracy multiparty accountable term limits choose competition governance leaders China as preferred model U.S. as preferred model See question texts in the Appendix. Contrary to concerns that China’s influence in Africa might weaken demand for democracy, respondents who rate China’s influence as “very positive” are actually more likely than those who rate it as “very negative” to say they prefer democracy over other forms of governance (71% vs. 63%) and to support elections as the best way of choosing leaders (77% vs. 69%) (Figure 15). There are no significant differences when it comes to views on other democratic norms and institutions. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 16
Figure 15: Support for democratic norms and institutions | by perceptions of China’s influence | 34 countries | 2019/2021 100% 78 76 77 76 76 80% 71 69 63 64 61 61 60 60% 40% 20% 0% Reject one- Elections are Support Support Support Prefer party rule best ways to presidential democracy multiparty accountable choose term limits competition governance leaders China's influence very positive China's influence very negative See question texts in the Appendix. When it comes to how much democracy Africans are getting, we do see modest evidence that when citizens admire China as a development model, they feel slightly better about their own country’s democratic governance. In evaluating the extent of democracy in their countries, citizens who prefer the China model do not differ from those who prefer the U.S. model (Figure 16). But on measures of election quality and presidential accountability to Parliament and to the courts, Africans who prefer the China model evaluate democratic conditions in their own country a bit more positively. Figure 16: Assessments of supply of democracy | by preference for China or U.S. as development model | 34 countries | 2019/2021 100% 80% 65 62 62 57 60 60% 53 53 55 44 42 40% 20% 0% Perceive country Satisfied with Elections President is President obeys to be a democracy mostly/completely accountable to laws and courts democracy free and fair Parliament China model preferred U.S. model preferred See question texts in the Appendix. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 17
Best international language for the future China’s pursuit of cultural “soft power” (Nantulya, 2018), for example via an expanding network of Confucius Institutes across the continent (BBC, 2019), appears to be making little progress. Asked which international language they think is most important for young Africans to learn, seven in 10 respondents (69%) cite English, while only 3% choose Chinese (Figure 17). English is particularly valued by Africans with at least a secondary education (77%-79%). Figure 17: Most important international language to learn | 34 countries | 2019/2021 English 69 French 14 Arabic 5 Kiswahili 3 Chinese 3 Portuguese 2 Other languages 1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Respondents were asked: In thinking about the future of the next generation in our country, which of these international languages, if any, do you think is most important for young people to learn? Conclusion Recent Afrobarometer surveys show that Africans generally hold positive views of both Chinese and U.S. economic and political influence on the continent. Moreover, attitudes toward the two countries are positively rather than negatively correlated, i.e. people who feel positive toward China are also more likely to view the United States positively, and vice versa. Importantly, Africans’ views on China do not appear to affect their support for democracy and democratic norms. China’s perceived influence has decreased over the past five years, and many citizens are concerned about their government’s indebtedness to China. In the end, Africans still prefer the United States over China as a development model for their country, and English remains the international language of choice across much of the continent. But Africans appear to welcome foreign engagement that meets their priorities, whether it originates in China or the United States. Do your own analysis of Afrobarometer data – on any question, for any country and survey round. It’s easy and free at www.afrobarometer.org/online-data-analysis. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 18
References Amoah, P. A., Hodzi, O., & Castillo, R. (2020). Africans in China and Chinese in Africa: Inequalities, social identities, and wellbeing. Asian Ethnicity, 21(4), 457-463. BBC. (2019). Confucius Institutes: The growth of China’s controversial cultural branch. 6 September. Brautigam, D. (2019). A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’: The rise of a meme. Area Development and Policy, 5(1), 1-1430 October. Brautigam, D., & Kidane, W. (2020). China, Africa, and debt distress: Fact and fiction about asset seizures. China Africa Research Initiative. Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. China Africa Research Initiative. (2018). Data: China-Africa trade. Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. Green, M. (2019). China’s debt diplomacy. Foreign Policy. 25 April. Lekorwe, M., Chingwete, A., Okuru, M., & Samson, R. (2016). China’s growing presence in Africa wins largely positive popular reviews. Afrobarometer dispatch. Mattes, R. (2020). Lived poverty on the rise: Decade of living-standard gains ends in Africa. Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 62. Mitchell, J. (2019). IMF: African economies are the world's fastest growing. FDI Intelligence. 17 October. Muchira, N. (2018). New $60b US fund to rival Chinese push into Africa. East African. 7 November. Nantulya, P. (2018). Grand strategy and China’s soft power push in Africa. Africa Center for Strategic Studies. 30 August. Pairault, T. (2021). China’s presence in Africa is at heart political. Diplomat. 11 August. Scott, C. D. (2021). Does China’s involvement in African elections and politics hurt democracy? Democracy in Africa. 27 September. Shepherd, C., & Blanchard, B. (2018). China's Xi offers another $60 billion to Africa, but says no to 'vanity' projects. Reuters. 3 September. Sun, Y. (2014). China’s aid to Africa: Monster or messiah? Brookings. 7 February. Thomas, D. (2021). What can Africa expect from FOCAC 2021? Africa Business. 6 October. Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 19
Appendix Table A.1: Afrobarometer Round 8 fieldwork dates and previous survey rounds Country Round 8 fieldwork Previous survey rounds Angola Nov.-Dec. 2019 N/A Benin Nov.-Dec. 2020 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017 Botswana July-August 2019 1999, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Burkina Faso Dec. 2019 2008, 2012, 2015, 2017 Cabo Verde Dec. 2019 2002, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017 Cameroon Feb.-March 2021 2013, 2015, 2018 Côte d'Ivoire Nov. 2019 2013, 2014, 2017 Eswatini March-April 2021 2013, 2015, 2018 Ethiopia DDc. 2019-Jan. 2020 2013 Gabon Feb. 2020 2015, 2017 Gambia Feb. 2021 2018 Ghana Sept.-Oct. 2019 1999, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Guinea Nov.-Dec. 2019 2013, 2015, 2017 Kenya August-Sept. 2019 2003, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2016 Lesotho Feb.-March 2020 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Liberia Oct.-Dec. 2020 2008, 2012, 2015, 2018 Malawi Nov.-Dec. 2019 1999, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Mali March-April 2020 2001, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2017 Mauritius Nov. 2020 2012, 2014, 2017 Morocco Feb. 2021 2013, 2015, 2018 Mozambique May-July 2021 2002, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2015, 2018 Namibia August 2019 1999, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Niger Oct.-Nov. 2020 2013, 2015, 2018 Nigeria Jan.-Feb. 2020 2000, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2015, 2017 Senegal Dec. 2020-Jan. 2021 2002, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2017 Sierra Leone March 2020 2012, 2015, 2018 South Africa May-June 2021 2000, 2002, 2006, 2008, 2011, 2015, 2018 Sudan Feb.-April 2021 2013, 2015, 2018 Tanzania Feb.-March 2021 2001, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2017 Togo Dec. 2020-Jan. 2021 2012, 2014, 2017 Tunisia Feb.-March 2020 2013, 2015, 2018 Uganda Sept.-Oct. 2019 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2015, 2017 Zambia Nov.-Dec. 2020 1999, 2003, 2005, 2009, 2013, 2014, 2017 Zimbabwe April-May 2021 1999, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2012, 2014, 2017 Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 20
Question texts for Figure 14 and Figure 15 (support for democratic norms and institutions) Respondents were asked: Reject one-party rule There are many ways to govern a country. Would you disapprove or approve of the following alternatives: Only one political party is allowed to stand for election and hold office? (% who “disapprove” or “strongly disapprove”) Support presidential term limits Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Statement 1: The Constitution should limit the president to serving a maximum of two terms in office. Statement 2: There should be no constitutional limit on how long the president can serve. (% who “agree” or “agree very strongly” with Statement 1) Elections are best way to choose leaders Which of the following statements is closest to your own opinion? Statement 1: We should choose our leaders in this country through regular, open, and honest elections. Statement 2: Since elections sometimes produce bad results, we should adopt other methods for choosing this country’s leaders. (% who “agree” or “agree very strongly” with Statement 1) Support democracy Which of these three statements is closest to your own opinion? Statement 1: Democracy is preferable to any other kind of government. Statement 2: In some circumstances, a non-democratic government can be preferable. Statement 3: For someone like me, it doesn’t matter what kind of government we have. (% who choose Statement 1) Support multiparty competition Which of the following statements is closest to your own opinion? Statement 1: Political parties create division and confusion; it is therefore unnecessary to have many political parties in [country]. Statement 2: Many political parties are needed to make sure that [citizens] have real choices in who governs them. (% who “agree” or “agree very strongly” with Statement 2) Prefer accountable governance Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Statement 1: It is more important to have a government that can get things done, even if we have no influence over what it does. Statement 2: It is more important for citizens to be able to hold government accountable, even if that means it makes decisions more slowly. (% who “agree” or “agree very strongly” with Statement 2) Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 21
Question texts for Figure 16 (assessments of supply of democracy) Respondents were asked: Perceived country to be a democracy In your opinion, how much of a democracy is [country] today? (% who say “a full democracy” or “a democracy with minor problems”) Satisfied with democracy Overall, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in [country]? (% who say “fairly satisfied” or “very satisfied”) Elections mostly/completely free and fair On the whole, how would you rate the freeness and fairness of the last general election, held in [year]? (% who say “completely free and fair” or “free and fair with minor problems”) President is accountable to Parliament In your opinion, how often, in this country does the president ignore the [national legislature] and just do what s/he wants? (% who say “rarely” or “never”) President obeys laws and courts In your opinion, how often, in this country does the president ignore the courts and laws of this country? (% who say “rarely” or “never”) Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 22
Josephine Appiah-Nyamekye Sanny is knowledge translation manager for Afrobarometer. Email: jappiah@afrobarometer.org. Edem Selormey is director of research at the Ghana Center for Democratic Development. Email: edem@cddgh.org. Afrobarometer, a nonprofit corporation with headquarters in Ghana, is a pan-African, non- partisan research network. Regional coordination of national partners in about 35 countries is provided by the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in South Africa, and the Institute for Development Studies (IDS) at the University of Nairobi in Kenya. Michigan State University (MSU) and the University of Cape Town (UCT) provide technical support to the network. Financial support for Afrobarometer Round 8 has been provided by Sweden via the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, the Mo Ibrahim Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) via the U.S. Institute of Peace. Donations help Afrobarometer give voice to African citizens. Please consider making a contribution (at www.afrobarometer.org) or contact Bruno van Dyk (bruno.v.dyk@afrobarometer.org) to discuss institutional funding. Follow our releases on #VoicesAfrica. /Afrobarometer @Afrobarometer Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 489 | 15 November 2021 Copyright ©Afrobarometer 2021 23
You can also read