BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD - Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center

Page created by Charlotte Cobb
 
CONTINUE READING
BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD - Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center
BP management in TBI

Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD

Neurocritical Care
University of Minnesota Medical Center
BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD - Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center
Hypertension is common in acute TBI

• Patients presenting with isolated TBI often
  present acutely hypertensive.
• A catecholamine surge occurs as stress
  response to the brain trauma, similarly to
  other types of acute brain injury
• to a massive release of epinephrine and
  norepinephrine in the systemic circulation
  can occur without increased ICp
BP management in TBI Mustapha Ezzeddine, MD - Neurocritical Care University of Minnesota Medical Center
Hypotension is also common in early TBI

 • About a third of all TBI patients are
   hypotensive
 • Often related to systemic trauma, hypoxia
   and blood loss
 • Can be present in isolated brain injury in
   about a third of the cases
 • Isolated TBI/hypotension more common in
   pediatrics.? Related to neurogenic cardiac
   injury
Early Hypotension is linked to worse
            outcomes

• Hypotension on presentation linked to
  150% increase in mortality in one study
• BP lower than 75% percentile linked to
  worse outcome even with SBP>90
• Patients with early hypotension did worse
  than patients with delayed hypotension.
Secondary Injury
      Hypotension = Devastation
• Chesnut RM, Marshall SB, Piek J, Blunt BA,
  Klauber MR, Marshall LF.

  Early and late systemic hypotension as a
  frequent and fundamental source of cerebral
  ischemia following severe brain injury in the
  Traumatic Coma Data Bank.

  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1993;59:121-5
Secondary Injury
                   Hypotension
• Severe head injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank
   – GCS score < or = 8
   – Hypotension = SBP < 90 mm Hg
• Early Hypotension: (248 of 717 patients)
   – Mortality: 55% vs 27%
   – If shock present, mortality was 65%
• Late Hypotension: In ICU (156 of 493 patients)
   – Mortality or vegetative state: 66% vs 17%
• Logistic Regression Modeling
   – Early and late shock were the most powerful independent
     predictors of mortality
Secondary Injury
         Hypotension & Hypoxia
• Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, Blunt
  BA, Baldwin N, Eisenberg HM,Jane JA,
  Marmarou A, Foulkes MA.

  The role of secondary brain injury in determining
  outcome from severe head injury.

  J Trauma 1993 Feb;34(2):216-22.
Secondary Injury
         Hypotension & Hypoxia
• Severe head injury (GCS score < or = 8) in 717
  cases in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank
• Impact on outcome of hypotension and hypoxia
  – Hypotension = SBP < 90 mm Hg
  – Hypoxia = Pao2 < 60 mm Hg, apnea or cyanosis
• Hypoxia and hypotension were independently
  associated with significant increases in morbidity
  and mortality from severe head injury
Secondary Injury Cascade

              Anemia
Ischemia and TBI

• Early ischemia (first 12 hrs post-injury)
   – Global ischemia
      • severe intracranial hypertension (mass lesion, diffuse
        swelling)
      • hypotension
      • severe diffuse injury
   – Regional ischemia
      • contusions
      • vascular injuries/compression
• Early CBF reflects severity of injury
• Early ischemia is strongly predictive of early
  mortality
Ischemia and TBI

• Late Ischemia (>12 hr after trauma)
   – Global - secondary ischemic insults
      •   Intracranial hypertension
      •   Hypotension
      •   Hypoxia
      •   Hypocarbia
      •   Anemia
      •   Fever
   – Regional - evolving contusions, vasospasm
• Late ischemia often can be prevented, or treated if
  detected early
• Late ischemia worsens outcome
PHYSIOLOGY
High energy requirements of the
             brain
•   Brain 2% body mass
•   20% of cardiac output
•   60% of body’s glucose
•   20% of consumed oxygen
•   Low oxygen extraction reserve ( high
    extraction under normal conditions)
CBF=CPP/CVR

CPP=MAP-ICP (CVP)
CPP: Cerebral Perfusion Pressure
MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure
ICP: Intracranial Pressure
CBF: Cerebral Blood Flow
CVR: Cerebrovascular resistance
CBF

                  Impaired
                  autoregulation

      Vasogenic
      edema                                    Chronic
                                               Hypertension

                     Ischemia

              l                     l
             50                    150
                                         MAP
Coupling of CMRO2 and CBF mediated by
local signals, ATP, nitric oxide NO,
adenosine, phospholipid metabolites

Very minimal neurogenic influence
(sympathetic or parasympathetic)

                          Hydrogen
                          ion mediated
Falling cerebral perfusion

                                                                         Cerebral perfusion pressure
Autoregulation, no symptoms

                                                    Ischaemic symptoms
                                                                         Cerebral blood volume
                                Exhausted reserve

                                                                         O2 extraction fraction

                                                                         Cerebral blood flow

                                                                         Cerebral metabolic rate of O2
Current Opinion in Neurology 2004, 17:705–709
Cerebral ischemia - duration

                               Normal flow, normal function
                      50

                               Low flow, raised O2 extraction, normal function
CBF (ml/100g brain)

                      20
                           Reversible
                           reduced
                                                              Irreversible
                           function
                                                              reduced
                                                              function
                       0
                                           Time
Compartmentalization of ICP
Brain Tissue
             Oxygenation Bpt02

             Cerebral
Multimodal   Microdyalisis
Neuro-
             Focal CBF
monitoring   monitors

              Continuous EEG
              monitoring
Brain Tissue Oxygenation

•   Intraprenchymal catheter with sensor tip
•   Measures local Po2, PCO2, and pH
•   Placed similarly to an ICP monitor
•   Ideally need to target placement in tissue
    at risk/ischemic penumbra
Cerebral Microdialysis

• Intraparenchymal microdialysis catheter
  inserted in a similar fashion to ICP bolt
• Typically measure glucose, lactate,
  pyruvate to detect ischemia
• Excitatory amino-acids
• Can measure other molecules (drugs,
  inflammatory markers
Jugular Bulb Oximetry

• Central venous oximetry catheter placed
  retrograde in IJ, to jugular bulb
• Continuous venous saturation Sjo2
• Can detect brain increased oxygen extraction
• 55-85% nl values,
Transcranial Doppler

•   cerebral blood flow velocities
•   Asses cerebrovascular reserve
•   Detect cessation of circulation-Brain Death
•   Pulsatility index for monitoring of edema
Why Regional CBF After TBI?
Heterogeneity of CBF after TBI
                                     Histogram of Average rCBF in Cortical ROIs
                                Patients with < 5mm shift                                                                 Patients with shift and/or mass lesion
                  40                                                                                                 60
Number of ROI's

                  30    Diffuse I                                                                                    50

                                                                                                   Number of ROI's
                  20                                                                                                 40
                                                                                                                                                         Diffuse IV
                  10
                                                                                                                     30
                  40
                                                                                                                     20
Number of ROI's

                  30
                                                                                                                     10
                        Diffuse II
                  20
                                                                                                                     40

                                                                                                   Number of ROI's
                  10
                                                                                                                     30

                  40
                                                                                                                     20
Number of ROI's

                                                                                                                                                                                        Mass Lesion
                  30
                                                                                                                     10
                       Diffuse III
                  20
                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                            100

                  10                                                                                                                                       rCBF in ROI
                   0
                         100

                                                    rCBF in ROI
Global         Continuous Monitors –
SjvO2 Catheter   Indirect Measures of CBF
                              Local
                          PbtO2 Catheter
CPP
Cerebral perfusion pressure
• CPP=MAP-ICP
  – original recommendations for CPP were extrapolated from
    effects of changing CPP in normals, who have intact
    autoregulation
• ‘CPP management’ stresses primacy of CPP over
  the actual ICP value
  – the ‘Lund protocol’ is diametrically opposed, lowering
    MAP to decrease edema production
  – both claim improved outcome compared to historical
    controls
• current AANS guidelines specify CPP of 60 mmHg
  – lower: poorer outcome
  – higher: more ARDS
CPP: What Target

• Reduction in CPP < 60-70 leads to secondary
  injury from release of glutamate (Vespa et al J
  Neurosurg 1998)
• One CPP does not fit all
  – Heterogeneous cerebral blood flow
  – At any given CPP, there are regions of the brain
    that are oligemic
  – Different CPP thresholds for different regions of the
    brain
The Lund Protocol
Brain Volume Regulation With Preserved Microcirculation

 •   Based on Physiological Principles
 •   Aim to decrease cranial fluid volume
 •   Maintain cerebral flow
 •   Protect brain from sympathetic mediated
     fluctuation of CBF
The Lund Protocol

• Increase interstitial fluid resorbtion
   – Maintain COP with normovolemia, normal serum
     albumin & haemoglobin
• Veno-constriction to decrease CBV
   – Dihydroergotamine
• Vasoconstriction of pre-capillary sphincter
   – Low dose thiopentone & dihydroergotamine
• Lower BP : CPP > 50
   – Beta 1 (metoprolol) & alfa 2 (clonidine) blockers
• Drain CSF via EVD for acute rise of ICP
The Lund Protocol

• CCM 1998;26:1881-6
   – 5 year study
   – 53 head injured patients (ICP> 25 & GCS < 8)
   – Study group
      • Mortality 8% & Severe brain damage 13%
   – Historical controls
      • Mortality 47% & Severe brain damage 11%
• CCM 1998;26:1787-8 Comment on above study
The Lund Protocol

• 3 independent non randomized trials, using main
  principles of Lund protocol with good outcome
   – Naredi S et al. ICM 1998;24:446-51
   – Eker et al. CCM 1998;26:1881-6
   – Naredi S et al. Acta Anaest. Scand. 2001;45:402-6
• Elf et al CCM 2002;30:129-134
   – Good outcome: Principles based ? More on Lund
      protocol than US guidelines
• Naredi S et al. Treatment of traumatic head injury-
  US/European Guidelines of the Lund Concept. Crit Care
  Med 2003;31:2713-4
Maximize CPP vs Hyperventilate & Decrease ICP

• Staged problems and management in traumatic acute
  brain injury
• Phase of Hypoperfusion
   – Correct BP & CPP with conventional means
• Phase of Hyperemia
   – Decrease cerebral blood flow with hyperventilation
• Phase of Vasospasm
   – Volume expansion with induced hypertension
Fluid thresholds and outcome from
         severe brain injury
• Retrospective study (from the NIH
  multicenter hypothermia trial data) of the
  effect on GOS of ICP, MAP, CPP, and fluid
  balance at 6 mo after injury
• Univariate predictors of poor outcome:
  – ICP >25 mm Hg
  – MAP
Fluid thresholds and outcome from
         severe brain injury

• Significant variables in a stepwise
  logistic regression:
  – GCS score at admission
  – Age
  – MAP  25 mm Hg
Fluid thresholds and outcome from
         severe brain injury
• Conclusions: Exceeding thresholds of ICP,
  MAP, CPP, and fluid volume may be detrimental
  to severe brain injury outcome.
• Fluid balance lower than -594 mL was
  associated with an adverse effect on outcome,
  independent of its relationship to intracranial
  pressure, mean arterial pressure, or cerebral
  perfusion pressure.
Maximize CPP vs Hyperventilate & Decrease ICP

• Claudia S. Robertson et al Critical Care
  Medicine 1999;27:2086-2095
  –   RCT 189 adults
  –   CPP group: CPP>70 & CO2 ~35 mmHg
  –   ICP group:CPP>50 & CO2 25-30
  –   CPP group had less frequency of jugular
      desaturation: 50.6% to 30% (p = .006)
       • Risk of cerebral ischemia 2.5 time greater in ICP group
  – No difference in neurological outcome
  – CPP group had 5 fold increase in ARDS (15 vs 3%)
       • TCDB data: ARDS associated with X 3 mortality in TBI
Effect of various medications on:
                         ICP/CBF
         Decreases                   No Change                    Increases
   INDUCTION AGENTS
      Barbiturates Midazolam                                Ketamine
          Etomidate Propofol Droperidol
   MUSCLE RELAXANTS              Vecuronium                 Succinylcholine
                                   Atracurium
                                            Pancuronium
   IV AGENTS       Lidocaine Narcotics            (rare paradox: fentanyl)
                      Benzodiazepines
   ANTI-HYPERTENSIVES            Labetolol                  Nitroglycerine
                                 Beta blockers              Nitroprusside
                                       ACE inhibitors       Hydralazine
   CA CHANNEL BLOCKERS           Nicardipine       Nifedipine
                                          Verapamil
   INHALATION AGENTS                      N2O      Isoflurane
                                                     Enflurane Halothane
Adapted from: Manual of Neuroanesthesia, Sperry,1989 Figure 2-3
BP IN OTHER BRAIN INJURIES
Stroke
 Blood pressure Management

BP reduction in acute ischemic
stroke might worsen ischemia

      BP reduction in acute
intracerebral hemorrhage might
     limit hematoma growth
Detrimental effect of blood pressure reduction in the
                     first 24 hours of acute stroke onset
                        NEUROLOGY 2003;61:1047-1051

      115 acute stroke patients within 24 hrs

                            OR                          95% CI       p
Age                         1.51 per 10-year increase 0.87 –2.64         0.15
NIHSS score                 1.55 per 1-point increase   1.28 –1.87
INTERACT

•   404 patients with ICH < 6hours
•   Randomized to SBP
HYPOTENSION
Hypotension after TBI
• A common phenomena after brain injury,
  occuring in one in five cases.
• Numerous observational studies have
  confirmed the association between systemic
  hypotension occurring at any point after injury
  and poor outcome.
• A single episode of hypotension is associated
  with approx doubling of mortality and a
  parallel increase in morbidity.
  – Persists when age and the presence of hypoxia and extracranial
    injuries are taken into account
• Most commonly due to inadequate volume
  resuscitation
Fluid Resuscitation:
                    Hypertonic Saline
Mechanism of Action                 Osmotic effect
 Osmotic effect                     Via properties of sodium chloride
                                       1. Low permeability across BBB
 Anti-inflammatory effects            2. Hi reflection coefficient (1.0)

 Modulation of neuroendocrine       Hyperosmolar concentrations
  system (ANP, VSP)                     Create a gradient to pull water
                                         from interstitial and intracellular
                                         spaces into the intravascular
 Maintain BBB integrity via             compartment
  membrane stabilization

 Improve regional cerebral blood
  flow (rCBF)
Hypertonic Saline –
                 Clinical Evidence

Cooper et al (JAMA 2004; 291:   1350)

 Design
   Prospective RCT of 229 severe TBI and
    hypotension in the field
   Bolus with 250 cc 7.5% LR or LR
 Results
   No baseline differences between groups
   Median GCS = 4, ISS 38, fluid = 1250
   No difference in Bp on arrival to ED
   No difference in morbidity or mortality
Hypertonic saline out of hospital TBI

• blunt trauma and a prehospital GCSof 8 or
  less not in hypovolemic shock.
• 250 cc bolus 7.5% saline vs NS
• Survival at 28 days was 74.3% with
  hypertonic saline/dextran, 75.7% with
  hypertonic saline, and 75.1% with normal
  saline
• No difference in functional outcomes
JAMA. 2010 Oct 6;304(13):1455-64.
2007 BTF Guidelines

A. Hypotensive patients should be treated
   with isotonic fluids.

B. Hypertonic resuscitation is a treatment
   option for TBI GCS < 8.
2007 BTF Guidelines

• B. Level II
Blood pressure should be monitored and
  hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm H
B. Level II
Aggressive attempts to maintain CPP above 70
  mm Hg with fluids and pressors should be
  avoided because of the risk of ARDS.
C. Level III
CPP of < 50 mm Hg should be avoided.
You can also read