Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy

Page created by Catherine Carter
 
CONTINUE READING
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Light in a Twist:
Orbital Angular Momentum

Miles Padgett
 Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
The talk today

•   Orbital Angular Momentum, what is it?
•   What has been done with OAM
•   A couple of example of what we have done and doing!
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
A question

• A photon carries a spin angular momentum of 

• So how does a multi-pole transition (ΔJ > ) conserve
  angular momentum?
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Linear momentum at a radius exerts a torque

             k

  r
                  k x r-> multipole transition

                                 Providing the lever is long
                                   enough, a fixed linear
                                  momentum can exert an
                                    arbitrary high torque
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Getting started on Orbital Angular Momentum of Light
•   1992, Allen, Beijersbergen, Spreeuw and Woerdman

                                              Miles Padgett

•   1994, Les meets Miles at dinner…...
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Orbital Angular Momentum from helical phase fronts

r"

                   E"

         z"
                        p!
              B"                                          p
                                              E"

                                                          z"
                                                   B"
pθ = 0                             pθ ≠ 0
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Angular momentum in terms of photons

•   Spin angular momentum
    – Circular polarisation                 σ = +1!
      σ per photon
•   Orbital angular momentum
    – Helical phasefronts                   σ = -1!
       per photon

         = 0!          = 1!      = 2!        = 3! etc!
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Optical vortices, Helical phasefronts , Angular momentum

• Intensity, I ≥0
                             = 0!
• Phase, 2π ≥ φ ≥0
      = 0, plane wave
      = 1, helical wave     = 1!
      = 2, double helix

                                                                            Interference +/- #
      = 3, pasta fusilli
   etc.
                             = 2!

                              = 3!

   = vortex charge!
                                                  I!      φ&        I!
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Orbital angular momentum from Skew rays

                               Poynting vector
Light in a Twist: Orbital Angular Momentum - Miles Padgett Kelvin Chair of Natural Philosophy
Making helical phasefronts with holograms
Making OR measuring phasefronts with holograms

            Make interactive by using SLM

Switching time                                                 Generate
≈5-20mSec
Efficiency ≈50%

        Light source
        OR detector                                Measure
Richard Bowman

A gift for all the family…..
And the point of shaping the spot is……
A double-start helix (=2)

Chambord castle (chateaux de la Loire)
OAM in optical manipulation

He et al. PRL 1995

                         Curtis et al. Opt Commun. 2002
OAM in quantum optics

Mair et al. Nature 2001
OAM in imaging

Fürhapter et al. Opt. Lett. 2005

                                   Swartzlander et al. Opt. Express 2008
OAM in communication

Tamburini et al. New J Phys. 2012

                                    Wang et al. Nature Photon 2012
OAM in not just light

Volke-Sepulveda et al. PRL 2008

                                   Verbeeck et al. Nature 2010
The OAM communicator
Optical Vortices before Angular Momentum
Fractality and Topology of Light’s darkness

Kevin O’Holleran
Florian Flossmann

Mark Dennis (Bristol)
Vortices are ubiquitous in nature

•   Whenever three (or more)                            2π
    plane waves interfere optical
    vortices are formed
     – Charge one vortices occur                   2π
       wherever there is diffraction
       or scattering

                                                   2π

                                                        0
Map out the vortex position in different planes

•   Either numerically or
    experimentally one
    can map the vortex
    positions in different
    planes
The tangled web of speckle

•   ≈1600 plane waves c.f. Gaussian speckle
Entanglement of OAM states
Quantum entanglement with spatial light modulators

Jonathan Leach
Barry Jack
Sonja Franke-Arnold
(Glasgow)

Steve Barnett
and Alison Yao (Strathclyde)

Bob Boyd
Anand Jha (Rochester)
OAM in second harmonic generation

•   Poynting vector “cork screws”,
    azimuthal skew angle is                              1 green
        θ = /kr                                         photon!
                                                           =20!
•   Does this upset a co-linear       “cork screwing”
    phase match? -No                  Poynting vector!
•   Frequency & -index both
    double
•   “Path” of Poynting vector stays
    the same
     – phase matching maintained

                                      2 infra red
                                       photons!
                                          = 0!
Correlations in angular momentum

                                      +10

                                      s

                                      -10
                                         -10                  +10
                                            π       i

Near perfect (anti)

                              Prob.
Correlations in angular                                  Δ
momentum

                                  -20           s -i         +20
Correlations in angle

                                       +π

                                           φs

                                           π
                                                π       φi        +π

Near perfect

                               Prob.
Correlations in angle                                        Δφ

                                       π            φs -φi             +π
Angular EPR

Correlations in complimentary basis sets
-> demonstrates EPR for Angle and Angular momentum
                                           2                     2
                       [               ][
                           Δ( s  i )        Δ(φ s φ i )   ]       = 0.00475 2
Entanglement of OAM states
Optical Activity /Faraday effect for OAM

Sonja Franke-Arnold
Graham Gibson
Emma Wisniewski-Barker

 Bob Boyd
Poincaré Sphere!   Poincaré Sphere for OAM!
The (Magnetic) Faraday Effect

    • Rotation of plane
      polarised light                                      L"

       Δθ pol = BLV
          • V Verdet constant
    • OR treat as phase
      delay of circularly                         B"
€     polarised light
       Δφ = σBLV                       Δθ = Δφ +σ ,−σ Δσ
          But the magnetic Faraday effect does NOT rotate an Image
• Photon drag, gives
      Polarisation rotation
       &   ΩL
      Δθ =
             c
               (         )
                n g − 1 nφ

            σΩL
       Δφ =
             c
                   (
                n g − 1 nφ   )
€
    • Mechanical Faraday
      Effect
€
• SAM -> Polarisation
  rotation
• OAM-> Image rotation
• Look through a Faraday
  isolator (Δθ≈45°), is the      ?
  “world” rotated - NO
   – SAM and OAM are not
     equivalent in the
     Magnetic Faraday effect
   – SAM and OAM are not
                                 ?
     equivalent in the optical
     activitiy
Enhancing the effect…..

• Plug in “sensible
  numbers” and get a
  micro-radian rotation…                   ΩL
• Increase the group
                              Δθ image   =
                                            c
                                              (
                                              n g − 1 nφ   )
  index to enhance the
  effect

                €
• Shine an elliptical laser
  beam (≈LG, Δ=2) @
  532nm through a
  spinning Ruby bar.

Camera                                   Laser

                  Spinning rod of ruby
≈25Hz clockwise  anticlockwise
A beam splitter for OAM

                   Martin Lavery

       Gregorius Berkhout (Leiden)

                Johannes Courtial
Angular momentum

•   Spin angular momentum
    – Circular polarisation                  σ = +1!
      σ per photon
•   Orbital angular momentum
    – Helical phasefronts                    σ = -1!
       per photon

         = 0!          = 1!        = 2!      = 3! etc!
Measuring spin AM

• Polarising beam
  splitter give the
  “perfect” separation of
  orthogonal (linear)
  states
   – Use quarter waveplate
     to separate circular
     states
   – Works for classical
     beams AND single
     photons
Measuring Orbital AM

                                 1
• OAM beam splitter
  give the “perfect”             2

  separation of
                                 3
  orthogonal states
  – But how?
                                 4

                                 5
It works for plane waves

• A “plane-wave” is focused by a lens
• A phase ramp of 2π displaces the spot
It works for plane waves

• Image transformation
    φ -> x and r -> y
  – i.e. Lz -> px

                        x
Replacing the SLMs

• The principle works
• But the SLMs are
  inefficient (≈50% x 2)
• Use bespoke optical
  elements (plastic)
   – Prof. David J
     Robertson                 reformater   phase corrector
   – Prof. Gordon Love
Doughnut to hot-dog

• The principle works
• But the SLMs are
  inefficient (≈50% x 2)   Annulus
• Use bespoke optical                       Line
                             Reforma(er)
  elements (glass/
  plastic)
    – Prof. David J
      Robertson                            Corrector)

    – Prof. Gordon Love
The output
Evolution in time c.f. translation and rotation

Φ = f(kz+ωt)                       Φ = f(kz+ωt+θ)
 = 0 time c.f. translation                    > 0 time c.f. rotation
Linear vs. Rotational Doppler shifts

Light source!                    Light source!

   Beam of light!
                                                 Ω!
             v!
Doppler shift from a translating surface

          θ&              Δω= ω0cosθ v/c

 v

But for rotation and OAM
                                             Δω= Ω #
v = Ωr and θ = /kr
Martin Lavery

           Rotational Frequency shifts

Scattered Light

Observe frequency shift
between +/- #
components

                                                         Illuminate#

Detector
Rotational Doppler shift in scattered light

                Δω = 2 Ω&

         c.f. Speckle velocimetry? Albeit, in this case, angular
More talks in 238
If you would like a copy of this talk please ask me

       www.gla.ac.uk/schools/physics/research/groups/optics/

2008             2011                            2012

                               !
You can also read