PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: P15/0267 - Dudley Home
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: P15/0267
Type of approval sought Full Planning Permission
Ward Castle and Priory
Applicant ALDI STORES LIMITED
Location: THE KING ARTHUR, PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY, WEST MIDLANDS,
DY1 4DS
Proposal DEMOLITION OF EXISTING PUBLIC HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED
BUILDINGS. ERECTION OF NEW RETAIL FOOD STORE (A1),
WITH ASSOCIATED CAR PARKING AND LANDSCAPING
Recommendation APPROVE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AND 106
Summary:
SITE AND SURROUNDINGS
1. This 0.6 hectare site is located at the corner of Priory Road and Birmingham New
Road (approximately 1.5 miles from Dudley Town Centre) and comprises a vacant
locally listed public house with extensive frontage parking area. The public house
ceased to operate in 2012. The site is bounded to the east by Birmingham New
Road and to the south by the gardens of residential properties on the North Priory
Estate and Priory Road, the public house being separated from the southern
boundary by the former beer garden and an area of small trees. To the west on the
opposite side of Priory Road is an area of open space leading to Wrens Nest Nature
Reserve. The site formerly had access points from both Birmingham New Road and
Priory Road.
2. The building is recorded on the Council’s Historic Environment Record (HER) as
HER 12899 and is an ‘inter-war’ public house which opened in 1939 and was
designed by GG Webb of Webb and Gray Architects. It is a symmetrical two-storey
building with a basement and single-storey curved wings which form a screen
enclosing the southern garden located at the rear. The building is constructed of
brown brick with stone and stucco dressings and has metal-framed windows and a
hipped roof covered with plain clay tiles with three very large, distinctive chimney
stacks.PROPOSAL
3. This is an application to demolish the public house and to erect a 1,000 square
metre single storey food store accessed from Priory Road (the access from
Birmingham New Road is to be closed off). The building would be approximately
64m long, 26m wide and 5.5m high. 89 frontage parking spaces are to be provided.
The service yard for the store is to be sited within the south-eastern corner of the
site. New retaining walls are to be erected alongside parts of the northern, eastern
and southern boundaries to enable the site levels to be built up from the existing so
that there is a shallower gradient across the site from Priory Road down to
Birmingham New Road. A new pedestrian crossing is to be provided on Priory
Road.
4. The application is accompanied by an Arboricultural Survey, Noise Impact
Assessment, Habitat and Bat Surveys, Vitality and Viability Assessments, Coal
Mining Risk Assessment, Energy Assessment, Travel Plan, Transport Assessment
and Ground Investigation Report and Heritage Assessment.
HISTORY
5. In April 2010 permission was granted (application P09/1729) for a 70-bedroom hotel
at the site adjacent to the public house. When making that decision Development
Control Committee also resolved to add the building to the Council’s List of
Buildings of Local Historic Importance.
6. A planning application for the change of use of the car park to a hand car wash was
refused by the Development Control Committee in 14 July 2011 (application
reference P11/0644) on the grounds that ‘the intensified use/activity and associated
development proposed in this location is considered to be unduly prominent and
visually intrusive in this gateway location, contrary to saved policies DD1 and DD4
of the Dudley UDP’.7. In October 2012 the Council was notified of an intention by the owner to demolish
the public house (application P12/1294). An Article 4 Direction was made in July
2013, the effect of which was to remove the permitted development right to
demolish. Ensuring that the demolition of the building requires planning permission
does not prevent redevelopment of the site but will allow the Council to properly
assess the significance of the building and consider the proposed demolition on its
full planning merits. An application to demolish the public house was subsequently
submitted (P14/1055) and refused by Committee in September 2014. No details of
any future redevelopment proposals at the site were submitted as part of the
application. The reasons were refusal were as follows:
1. The King Arthur Public House is a locally listed landmark building occupying a
gateway position into Dudley. The proposal to demolish it in the absence of an
appropriate replacement development would result in the total loss of the heritage
asset and of part of the Borough’s townscape, to the detriment of local character
and distinctiveness. The proposal is therefore considered not to be sustainable
development and is contrary to paragraphs 7, 17, 131 and 135 of the NPPF,
Policies CSP3 and ENV2 of the Black Country Core Strategy, and Saved UDP
Policy HE5.
2. Paragraph 7 of the NPPF advises that to achieve sustainable development,
economic, social and environmental gains should be sought jointly and
simultaneously. Whilst the applicant has attempted to demonstrate the economic
gains there has not been a clear demonstration of the social and environmental
gains, particularly in the absence of any details of what is proposed to replace the
heritage asset. Furthermore the policy test which requires the applicant to
demonstrate the viability of continued beneficial use, restoration or conversion of the
heritage asset and that there are no reasonable alternatives has not been fully
considered or investigated. In this respect the proposal is contrary to paragraphs 7,
17, 131, and 136 of the NPPF, BCCS Policies CSP3 and ENV 2, and Saved UDP
Policy HE5.PUBLIC CONSULTATION
8. 9 letters of objection have been received, raising the following concerns:
• increased traffic generation will exacerbate existing congestion problems in
the area;
• the public house is a local landmark building and ‘gateway’ to Dudley Town
Centre which forms an important part of the history of the borough and
should therefore be retained and converted to an alternative use;
• impact on the viability of existing local shops.
9. A 102-signature petition has been submitted by the Office of Councillor Bill
Etheridge MEP. The petitioners object to the application on the grounds of traffic
congestion, threat to local businesses and loss of a historic building.
10. Sedgley Local History Society has objected to the application. The Society is of the
opinion that the public house is situated at a ‘gateway’ to the centre of Dudley and is
a ‘fine’ example of a road-house facing the 1920s Wolverhampton to Birmingham
dual carriageway. Notwithstanding the loss of internal period features, the external
appearance deserves protection and a sympathetic redevelopment of the site is
quite feasible.
11. 165 letters of support have been received. The following comments have been
made by supporters of the proposal:
• A food store in this location would benefit the local community as there is no
other similar facility within walking distance;
• The existing building is an ‘eyesore’ which attracts anti-social behaviour, the
proposed development will enhance the appearance of the area;
• The development will provide employment for the local community.OTHER CONSULTATION
12. Coal Authority: No objection subject to a condition requiring site investigation works
to be carried out to establish whether remedial works are required to consolidate
any shallow mine workings.
Head of Environmental Health and Trading Standards: Due to the proximity of the
loading bay to residential properties delivery times should be restricted by condition
to protect the amenities of the occupants of those properties. An acoustic barrier
must also be erected along the boundary of the site with adjacent housing and
noise generated by fixed plant should be restricted.
Contaminated Land Team: No objection, subject to a condition requiring the
submission of a scheme for remediation of any ground gases.
Group Engineer (Highways): The effects of traffic have been considered on the
operation of the Prior Road/Birmingham New Road traffic signal junction which has
been tested with traffic flows much higher than national average flows for similar
stores as a test for robustness. It is likely there will be increased congestion by 2020
but this is primarily from background traffic growth - the traffic associated with the
store will exacerbate the situation to a degree. The applicant has agreed to
contribute to an improved right turn storage facility on Birmingham New Road South
bound arm which will reduce queuing times and delays at the junction and will offset
some of the impact of the development.
There is adequate parking and the development provides an improved visibility
splay at the access, a new pedestrian crossing to help pedestrians on Priory Road,
and a pedestrian crossing to help pedestrians safely cross the store access.
Therefore subject to a range of conditions and the applicant entering into
appropriate agreements to facilitate the works, there are no objections to the
proposal.RELEVANT PLANNING POLICY
13. National Planning Policy
• National Planning Policy Framework (2012)
• National Planning Policy Framework Planning Guidance (2014)
Black Country Core Strategy (2011)
• Policy CSP3 (Environmental Infrastructure)
• Policy EMP5 (Improving Access to the Labour Market)
• Policy DEL1 (Infrastructure Provision)
• Policy CEN7 (Controlling Out of Centre Development)
• Policy TRAN2 (Managing Transport Impacts of New Development)
• Policy ENV1 (Nature Conservation)
• Policy ENV2 (Historic Character and Local Distinctiveness)
• Policy ENV7 (Renewable Energy)
Saved 2005 Unitary Development Plan Policies
• Policy DD1 (Urban Design)
• Policy DD3 (Design of Retail Development)
• Policy DD4 (Development in Residential Areas)
• Policy HE5 (Buildings of Local Historic Importance)
• Policy EP7 (Noise Pollution)
Supplementary Planning Policy Documents
• Historic Environment SPD
• Parking Standards SPD
ASSESSMENT
14. The principle issues in the determination of this application are:
• Retail planning policy;• Impact on the significance of the Heritage Asset and impact on local
character and distinctiveness;
• Viability;
• Design;
• Residential Amenity;
• Nature Conservation;
• Planning Obligations
Retail Planning Policy
15. The key policy issue relating to the proposed development is whether, with regard
to Core Strategy Policy CEN7, it would be acceptable in this out-of-centre location.
Proposals for out-of-centre development are required to demonstrate that the
development cannot be provided in ‘in-centre’ or ‘edge of centre’ locations.
16. The NPPF in Paragraph 24 states that Local Planning Authorities ‘should apply a
sequential test to planning applications for main town centre uses that are not in an
existing centre and not in accordance with an up-to-date Local Plan’. The Dudley
Area Action Plan identifies two sites within the town centre as ‘Opportunity Sites’ for
new food store developments, these being land at King St/Flood Street and Trindle
Road/Hall Street.
King Street/Flood Street
17. The applicants have advised that this 2 hectare site is larger than they require to
deliver a store of the size proposed. The applicants considered developing on parts
of the site only, on the assumption that the food store development approved in
2012 was implemented – however this option was dismissed as being unsuitable
because the site area would be too small and would create a location divorced from
the remainder of the town centre. The applicants are unwilling to locate on the site
given its proximity to their existing store at Peartree Lane, as the overlapping trading
catchment areas would harm the trading position of both stores.Trindle Road/Hall Street
18. The applicant has advised that again this site is too close to their store on Peartree
Lane and as such they cannot invest in this town centre site as it would result in two
underperforming stores and undermine their business model.
19. On the basis of the above it is considered that compliance with the sequential test
has been demonstrated.
20. The NPPF and Policy CEN7 require ‘impact assessments’ to be carried out to
assess the impact of a proposed development on existing or planned investment in
centres within the catchment area of the proposal. The applicant has submitted a
Retail Statement to demonstrate the potential retail consequences of the proposal;
Officers have assessed the information submitted and are satisfied that the
proposed food store would not undermine the planned investment sites at King
Street/Flood Street and Trindle Road/Hall Street and would have no adverse
impacts on the vitality and viability or the trade and turnover of any centre within the
catchment area of the proposed store.
Impact on the significance of the Heritage Asset and impact on local character and
distinctiveness
21. The King Arthur Public House is a Locally Listed building occupying a prominent
location on the junction of Priory Road and Birmingham New Road. It is recorded on
the Council’s Historic Environment Record (HER) and it is considered within the
framework of the NPPF to be a ‘Heritage Asset’. Located to the west of the
application is the Wren’s Nest Landscape Heritage Area and to the south of the
application site is the Priory and Wren’s Nest Municipal Housing Estate, a collection
of inter-war houses which are collectively considered to be an Area of High Historic
Townscape value.
22. In April 2010 an application for a 70 bedroom hotel was approved for the site
(P09/1729). This scheme proposed the retention and reuse of the existing building.
When making that decision, the Development Control Committee also agreed a
second recommendation that ‘The King Arthur Public House is a local landmarkoccupying a gateway position into Dudley. It is worthy of retention and designation
as a Locally Listed Building’. The Building has been on the Council’s List of
Buildings of Local Historic Significance since that date and accordingly when
considering development proposals Saved UDP Policy HE5 is directly relevant
which states that the Council will ‘resist development which will involve demolition or
part demolition of buildings or structures on the Local List’. In 2013 the King Arthur
was considered by English Heritage for addition to the statutory list. During this
process it was concluded however that in terms of statutory listing the King Arthur
‘falls short’. English Heritage did however endorse the Local Listing status of the
building stating ‘it is certainly a building of strong local architectural interest as an
inter-war public house and this is reflected in its inclusion on the local list’.
23. The significance of the Heritage asset is therefore clear and accordingly, within the
framework of the NPPF, policies regarding non-designated heritage assets are
applicable to the King Arthur. Paragraph 135 of the NPPF states that the effect of
an application on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset should be
taken into account in determining the application. In weighing applications that
affect directly or indirectly a non designated heritage asset a balanced judgment will
be required having regard to the scale of any harm or loss to the significance of the
heritage asset.
24. Within the context of the NPPF, demolition of the building would result in the total
loss of the significance of the heritage asset. In respect of Black Country Core
Strategy Policy ENV2 the loss of a building that is considered to contribute very
positively to the townscape of the Borough would bring about loss of local character
and distinctiveness. Policy CSP3 of the Strategy seeks to protect, enhance and
expand at every opportunity the environmental infrastructure network within the
Black Country, which includes buildings of high design quality. The demolition of the
existing building in itself would therefore constitute ‘substantial harm’.
25. A Heritage Statement has been submitted with this application, providing a detailed
record of the existing building and describing the significance of the King Arthur in
terms of it being a heritage asset as is required under paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
The applicant has stated that in this instance a case can be made for the loss of theHeritage Asset on the grounds that that the building asset is genuinely redundant
and it is preventing all reasonable uses of the site in which it sits.
Viability
26. The NPPF (Paragraph 131) advises that Local Planning Authorities should, when
determining planning applications, take account of the potential to sustain and
enhance the significance of a heritage asset and put them to viable uses consistent
with their conservation. The NPPF also places strong emphasis on securing
economic growth in order to create jobs and prosperity and ensuring the planning
system does what it can to support sustainable economic growth. The NPPF
acknowledges that keeping land in active use is a public benefit and a balance has
to be struck between the loss to the locality of the significance of the heritage asset
and the benefits of returning the site to use.
27. However given the irreversibility of any such decision, the demolition of a heritage
asset on these grounds is very much a last resort after every option to secure a
viable future for the asset has been exhausted. Saved Policy HE5 of the UDP states
that the Council will resist development which will involve demolition of buildings on
the Local List and that applications proposing demolition will be required to
demonstrate that the viability of continued beneficial use, restoration or conversion
has been fully investigated and that there are no reasonable alternatives.
28. In accordance with the requirements of the NPPF and Policy HE5 the applicant has
submitted information relating to the demand for re-use via conversion of the
building as a public house, hotel, dwellings or shops, with the intention of
demonstrating that a competitive return (20% generally being regarded as an
industry standard) could not be made on a reasonable investment in the building.
29. The applicant advises that several well-known national companies which own and
operate public houses had either expressed no interest in re-using the site as a
public house or had concluded that the return on investment would be too low. The
applicant has sought the advice of an agent familiar with the local market for public
houses and hotels, who found that viability would be affected by significant
competition along this stretch of road from existing similar establishments. Inaddition the agent also cited the generally decreasing demand for public houses in
the borough, in common with similar areas nationally.
30. In relation to the potential re-use of the building as dwellings, an agent familiar with
the local residential market has advised that the demand for conversion
opportunities of this nature in the Black Country is particularly low and that
conversion would be unviable without a significant improvement in sales prices.
31. In the case of retail use, the information submitted shows that profit levels would be
significantly below a 20% figure for a competitive return and that such a use would
therefore not be viable.
32. This information was previously submitted with application P14/1055 and was
assessed by the Council’s Property Surveyors who advised that it was factually
accurate and as such they did not dispute the conclusions reached in the four
scenarios explored. The applicant has advised that the existing building cannot be
converted as it does not fit the size or model of their stores and that the building is
in such a poor state of dilapidation that it would be financially unviable to convert it.
Therefore with regard to Policy HE5 it is considered that the viability of continued
beneficial use or conversion has been fully investigated and that there are no
reasonable alternative to the demolition of the building. On balance, the benefits of
returning the site to a use which will create jobs and support sustainable economic
growth within the Borough outweigh the loss to the locality of the heritage asset.
Design
33. The impact of the proposed development (in particular the replacement building)
must be assessed with regard to the following Saved UDP Policies:
• Policy DD1 – all developments should make a positive contribution to the
character and appearance of the area;
• Policy DD3 – retail developments should provide active elevations to public
areas which are in scale and proportion with the street scene and provide
service areas which are not prominent in views from public areas;• Policy DD4 – non-residential development will be allowed where there would
be no adverse effect on the character of the area.
34. The applicant has advised that their approach to food retailing is based on
‘simplicity and efficiency at every stage of the business’ which enables them to sell
products at the lowest possible price. One of the consequences of this retailing
concept is that the design of their stores must be capable of accommodating bulk
food displays, whilst being able to provide the operational efficiency that a discount
food store requires.
35. In terms of the appearance of the proposed building, the applicant has stated that
the external design of the proposed store is ‘unique’ and differs in terms of the
materials and colours to be used from their other stores, using blockwork with rough
and smooth textures. A large glazed shopfront entrance is to be provided facing
Priory Road, providing focus to the main elevation. The elevation facing Birmingham
New Road has a large glazed area at one end and a long strip window across its full
length which will provide visual interest to the elevation. The loading bay is located
on the eastern side of the building, away from public views in accordance with the
requirements of Saved UDP Policy DD4. A number of different surface treatments
are to be provided for the hard landscaping of the development, including tiles,
block paving and tarmac. Soft landscaping is proposed along the Priory Road and
Birmingham Road frontages which will help to soften the development and
assimilate it within in its surroundings.
36. It is considered that the proposed development, in terms of its design, scale and
layout, will make a positive contribution to the character of the area and as in this
respect the proposal complies with Saved UDP Policies DD1, DD3 and DD4.
Highway Safety
37. Policy TRAN2 of the Core Strategy states that planning permission will not be
granted for proposals that are likely to have significant transport implications unless
applications are accompanied by proposals to provide an acceptable level of
accessibility and safety. The Group Engineer has no objection and on that basis it isconsidered that the information submitted in the applicant’s Transport Statement
satisfactorily demonstrates that the development will not have any adverse impact
on highway safety within the vicinity of the site. The Group Engineer has also
advised that the improvements to the junction (to be paid for by the developer at a
cost of £20,000, secured by a s106 Agreement) will negate the effects of increased
traffic generation and ensure the highway network can accommodate the additional
traffic movements that will be created.
Residential Amenity
38. Saved UDP Policy DD4 also requires that developments should not have any
adverse impact on residential amenity, whilst Policy EP7 advises that measures to
minimise noise should be included where developments are expected to generate
noise. Should permission be granted the conditions recommended by the Head of
Environmental Health and Trading Standards must be imposed to safeguard the
amenities of occupants of dwellings to the south of the site.
Nature Conservation
39. Policy ENV1 of the Core Strategy requires that information must be submitted with
planning applications for proposals which may affect any important habitat or
species to ensure that the likely impacts of the proposal can be fully assessed. The
applicant’s wildlife surveys recommend that any demolition works affecting areas
where birds could be nesting should be avoided during the nesting season
(between the beginning of March and end of August).
40. The surveys advise that the building supports a single bat roost beneath a roof tile
and therefore recommends that roof tiles should be stripped by hand before the
demolition of the building in the presence of a bat ecologist (a licence will be
required from Natural England to legally proceed with the demolition). To
compensate for the lost roost two bat boxes should be installed on mature trees
within the site. It is also recommended that features are integrated into the fabric of
any new building to provide long term enhancement and provision for roosting bats.Planning Obligations
41. In accordance with Policy DEL1 of the Core Strategy and the Planning Obligations
SPD, the development triggers a requirement for the provision of improvements to
air quality, nature conservation, public art, public realm and economic and
community development.
42. Electric vehicle charging points can be sought within the site layout (by condition)
which will help to improve air quality, as well as details of the proposed hard
surfacing and any boundary treatment to ensure that the development provides
attractive features within the street scene that contribute to an improvement to the
public realm. Conditions can also be used to secure public art feature(s) (which
could potentially refer to the past use of the site and the historic building) within the
development and an economic and community development statement to ensure
that job opportunities at the store are available to local people (in accordance with
Policy EMP5 of the Core Strategy). The nature conservation improvements referred
to in paragraphs 38 and 39 can be secured by conditions.
CONCLUSION
43. The applicant has satisfactorily demonstrated that the proposed development
cannot be accommodated within a town centre site and that development in this
location would not undermine the vitality or viability of the town centre. The viability
of continued beneficial use or conversion of the existing building at the site has
been fully investigated and it is accepted that there are no reasonable alternative to
its demolition and that the benefits of returning the site to a use which will create
jobs and support sustainable economic growth within the Borough outweigh the loss
to the locality of the heritage asset. The development will have a positive impact on
the character on the area and no adverse effect on residential amenity, highway
safety or wildlife species will occur. As such the proposal complies with Core
Strategy Policy EMP5 and Saved UDP Policies DD1, DD3, DD4, D5, ENV1 and
HE5.RECOMMENDATION
44. It is recommended that the application be APPROVED subject to:
c) The applicant entering into a Section 106 legal agreement to provide a
contribution of £20,000 towards the costs of highways works to increase the
capacity of the right turn storage facility on Birmingham New Road south bound
arm;
b) a management and monitoring charge;
c) The following conditions with powers delegated to the Strategic Director of Place
to add remove or revise such conditions as necessary
Conditions and/or reasons:
1. The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three
years from the date of this permission.
2. No development shall commence until details of works of public art have been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The works
of public art shall thereafter be provided in accordance with the approved details
prior to first occupation of the development and be maintained for the life of the
development.
3. No development shall commence until an Economic and Community
Development Statement has been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority. The Statement shall address as a minimum, measures
to increase the number of jobs open to local people available on the site and the
development of initiatives that support activities to upskill local unemployed
people of working age so as to support them into sustained employment as
outlined in the Council's Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning
Document. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the
approved Statement and retained in accordance with the Statement for the
lifetime of the development.
4. No development shall commence until details for the provision of external
electric vehicle charging points have been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority. The charging points shall thereafter be provided
in accordance with the approved details prior to first occupation of the
development and be maintained for the life of the development.
5. Prior to the commencement of development details of the existing and proposed
levels of the site (including finished floor levels), which should be related to
those of adjoining land and highways, shall be submitted to and approved inwriting by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall proceed in
accordance with the approved levels.
6. Prior to the commencement of development, details of the types, colours and
textures of the materials to be used in the hard surfacing of the development
hereby approved shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in complete
accordance with the approved details and retained for the lifetime of the
development unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning
Authority.
7. Prior to the commencement of development, details of the types, colours and
textures of the materials to be used on the external surfaces of the buildings
hereby approved shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in complete
accordance with the approved details.
8. Prior to the commencement of development details of the materials to be used in
the retaining walls hereby approved on the site shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall
proceed in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation and the
walls shall be retained and maintained as approved for the lifetime of the
development.
9. Prior to the commencement of development details of the types of boundary
treatments to be installed at the site shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall thereafter take
place in accordance with the approved details and retained for the lifetime of the
development unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning
Authority.
10. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the
following approved plans: Y11A18-P200, Y11A18-P201, Y11A18-P003 rev B,
Y11A18-P004 Rev A, Y11A18-P300 rev A.
11. All the existing trees and hedges indicated on the approved drawings to be
retained shall be protected by suitable fencing and at a suitable distance as
outlined in BS:5837 - 2005 - 'Trees in Relation to Construction', or such
alternatives as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such
fences shall be erected before any materials are brought onto site or
development commences. No materials shall be stored, no rubbish dumped, no
fires lit and no buildings erected inside the fence(s), nor shall any changes in
ground level be made within the fence(s) unless previously agreed in writing by
the Local Planning Authority.
12. The overall floor space of the food store shall be limited to no more than 1,499
m2 gross. No more than 1,006 m2 of the floor space of the building shall be
used for net retail sales, no more than 805 m2 of that net floorspace shall be
used for the sale of convenience goods, and no more than 201 m2 net
floorspace shall be used for the sale of comparison goods.
13. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as
amended) and Schedule 2, Part 42, Class A of the Town and Country Planning
(General Permitted Development Order) 1995 (as amended) (or order revoking
or reacting that order with or without amendment) the food store shall not be
extended externally without the express grant of planning permission.14. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and County Planning Act 1990 (as
amended by Section 49 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and
the Town and Country Planning (General Procedural) Order 1995 (as amended)
no mezzanine floor(s) shall be provided within the store without the express
grant of planning permission.
15. At least 10% of the energy supply of the development shall be secured from
decentralised and renewable or low-carbon energy sources (as described in the
glossary of Planning Policy Statement: Planning and Climate Change
(December 2007)). Details and a timetable of how this is to be achieved,
including details of physical works on site, shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be
implemented in accordance with the approved timetable and retained as
operational thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning
Authority.
16. Prior to the commencement of development site investigation works shall be
carried out to establish whether there are shallow mine workings within the
vicinity of the site. In the event that the site investigations identify the need for
remedial works to mine entries, details of the proposed works shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development
shall thereafter take place in accordance with the approved details.
17. No deliveries or despatches shall be made to or from the site before 07:30 or
after 20:00 Monday to Saturday, or 09:00 and 18:00 on Sundays and Public
Holidays.
18. Prior to commencement of the development a scheme for a continuous acoustic
barrier to be erected along the boundaries of the site with residential properties
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority.
The barrier shall be of minimum height of 2.5 metres measured from the ground
level and minimum surface density of 10 kg/m2. All works which form part of the
approved scheme shall be completed before the approved use commences and
the barrier shall be retained throughout the life of the development.
19. The rating level of sound emitted from any fixed plant associated with the
development, shall not exceed background sound levels by more than 5dB(A)
between the hours of 0700-2300 (taken as a 15 minute LA90 at the nearest
sound sensitive premises) and shall not exceed the background sound level
between 2300-0700 (taken as a 15 minute LA90 at the nearest sound sensitive
premises). All measurements shall be made in accordance with the methodology
of BS4142 (2014) (Methods for rating and assessing industrial and commercial
sound) and/or its subsequent amendments.
Where access to the nearest sound sensitive property is not possible,
measurements shall be undertaken at an appropriate location and corrected to
establish the noise levels at the nearest sound sensitive property. Any
deviations from the LA90 time interval stipulated above shall be agreed in writing
with the local planning authority.
20. Should cooking of food become an integral business activity a scheme
containing full details of arrangements for internal air extraction, odour control,
and discharge to atmosphere from cooking operations, including any external
ducting and flues, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The works detailed in the approved scheme shall be installed
in their entirety before any cooking commences. The equipment shall thereafterbe maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and operated
at all times when cooking is being carried out unless otherwise agreed
beforehand in writing with the Local Planning Authority
21. No development shall begin until an assessment of the risks posed by any
ground gases or vapours has been submitted to and approved by the Local
Planning Authority. Such an assessment shall be carried out in accordance with
authoritative UK guidance.
22. Where the approved risk assessment (required by Condition 21) identifies
ground gases or vapours posing unacceptable risks, no development shall begin
until a detailed scheme to protect the development from the effects of such
contamination has been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning
Authority.
23. Unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority the
approved scheme (required by Condition 22) shall be implemented and a
verification report submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority,
before the development (or relevant phase of the development) is first
occupied/brought into use.
24. No development shall commence until details of all external lighting to be
installed at the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The development shall thereafter take place in accordance
with the approved details.
25. No development shall commence (excluding demolition, site clearance and initial
ground works) until details of a one way traffic system within the parking area,
including details of signing and lining have been submitted to and approved in
writing by the local planning authority. The development shall not be occupied
until the one way system has been provided in accordance with the approved
details. These areas shall thereafter be retained and not be used for any other
purpose during the life of the development.
26. No development shall commence (excluding demolition, site clearance and initial
ground works) until details of the access into the site, together with parking and
turning areas within the site (including details of lines, widths, levels, gradients,
cross sections, drainage and lighting) have been submitted to and approved in
writing by the local planning authority. The development shall not be occupied
until the access, together with parking and turning areas within the site, have
been laid out in accordance with the approved details. These areas shall
thereafter be retained and maintained to an adoptable standard and not be used
for any other purpose during the life of the development.
27. The development shall not be occupied/used until details of internal secure and
undercover staff cycle parking and shower facilities and secure and undercover
customer cycle storage facilities have been submitted to and approved in writing
by the local planning authority. These facilities shall be provided in accordance
with the approved details prior to the first use/occupation of the development
and shall thereafter be retained and maintained for no other purpose for the life
of the development.
28. The development shall not be occupied until the access onto Birmingham New
Road has been removed, the grass verge replaced and all redundant dropped
kerbs have been replaced with matching full height kerbs and the adjacent
Highway made good.29. The development shall not be occupied until details of a service vehicle
management plan have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local
Planning Authority. The management plan shall remain in operation for the
lifetime of the development or until agreed in writing by the Local Planning
Authority.
30. No development shall commence until details of the proposed landscaping of the
site, to include any replacement tree planting along the southern boundary of the
site, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning
authority. The development shall thereafter take place in accordance with the
approved details.
31. The development hereby approved shall not be occupied until a Travel Plan has
been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority,
including details of a Travel Plan Co-ordinator, Staff Travel Survey, Car Parking
Management, Walking and Cycling initiatives, Publicity and Marketing, Set
targets and monitoring and to join Company Travel Wise in Dudley together with
a timetable for the implementation of each such element. The Travel Plan shall
be implemented in accordance with the details approved by the local planning
authority and remain operational for the life of the development.
32. No development shall commence until the design, size, location, artwork and
text for 2 interpretation panels have been submitted to and approved in writing
by the local Planning Authority. Before first occupation of the development the
interpretation panels shall be installed with such agreed details and thereafter
maintained for the lifetime of the development.
33. The demolition works herby permitted shall not be undertaken before a contract
for carrying out of the works of redevelopment of the site has been executed for
the redevelopment for which the contract provides. Evidence that a contract has
been executed shall be submitted in writing to the Local Planning Authority 14
days prior to any demolition works commencing.Site Approx.
Dalkin Scotton Partnership
Architects Limited
PLANNING ISSUE
CLIENT ALDI STORES LIMITED
PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY
TITLE LOCATION PLAN
SCALE 1:1250 @ A4 DRAWN SPK NORTH DWG No. REV
DATE 09-02-2015 CHECKED Y11A18 - P001F E D C B A
167.600+
+167.540 B
Existing +167.820
wall
+167.665
170500 168.080+ 167.450+
+ CAR PARK
FREEZER / NIGHT
CHILLER
WAREHOUSE RETAIL AREA
New retaining wall +167.955
FFL 168.780 (2100mm ht) as indicated
167.610+
+ 168.385 168.185 Store FFL Store FFL Existing tree
retained
167.915
+167.835
+ + 167.785 167.680 167.550
on plan with metal bow
+ + + top fencing (1500mm ht ) 167.350+
+ 167.475+
+167.680
165.550 168.115+
+
Y
LA
SP
TY
LI
+168.570
BI
SI
VI
+168.265
+168.445
167.700+
+168.400
+168.520
91No Approx.
Car Parking
LONGITUDINAL SECTION THROUGH STORE AND CAR PARK (Scale 1:200) 168.670+
+168.545
+168.720
Spaces
Site Approx.
167.500+
+168.780
168.250+ +167.640
+168.780
A 167.600+
AY
SPL
ITY
IBIL
VIS
168.385+
+168.260
167.810+
+168.430 +168.265 167.650+
+168.390
168.600+
+167.865
167.985+
ALDI STORE
168.600+ CONCEPT II
167.950+
167.700+
175.550 175.560 +168.075
+ 11 10 9 + 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (18.3 x 55m)
Approximate position of 6m high retaining wall +168.100
+167.975
+167.900
New retaining wall
173.010 (1050mm ht) as indicated FFL 168.780
+ on plan with metal bow top
fencing (1500mm ht )
Banked
167.750+
Landscaping 170500
+
169410
B
168.620 FFL 168.780 168.600 + 168.000+
+
+167.480
+ + +168.100
167.480
+
A
CROSS SECTION THROUGH STORE AND SITE (Scale 1:200)
SITE PLAN (Scale 1:500)
175.560
11 10 9 + 8 7 6 Overall height of store is 5 4 3 2 1
approximately 5500mm from FFL
Fire exit
keep
clear
FFL 168.780 168.600
+ +
167.480
+
Dalkin Scotton Partnership
Architects Limited
STORE SECTION A-A (Scale 1:100)
PLANNING ISSUE
F E D Overall height of store is C B A
approximately 5500mm from FFL
A Building repositioned, car park levels amended. 09/03/15 SPK JW
Revision Description Date Drawn Checked
FREEZER / NIGHT
WAREHOUSE RETAIL AREA
CHILLER
FFL 168.780 CLIENT
ALDI STORES LIMITED
+
PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY
TITLE
PROPOSED SECTIONS
STORE SECTION B-B (Scale 1:100) DATE 17-02-2015 SCALE AS SHOWN @ A1 DRAWN SPK CHECKED
DWG No.
Y11A18 - P300 REVISION
A NORTHSURFACE WATER DRAINS All cover levels are approximate and should be adjusted on site as necessary.
MANHOLE COVER DETAILS
MH Ref Cover Level Invert level MH Size Depth MH Cover Comments Connection to existing
storm water drain Type A - 600x600mm medium duty cast iron cover and frame to B.S. 497.
S01 168.690 TBA TBA Type A Type B - 600x600mm heavy duty cast iron cover and frame to B.S. 497.
S02 167.885 TBA TBA Type A For details of P.C.C. ring manhole construction refer to drawing no. 326 and 327
S03 167.745 TBA TBA Type A For details of backdrop manhole construction refer to drawing no. 344
S04 167.615 TBA TBA Type B BY-PASS SEPARATOR
S05 167.430 TBA TBA Type A Ramp drainage to discharge into storm water drainage sewer via a Class 1 BY-PASS Separator, size and orientation by
S06 167.600 TBA TBA Type A Klargester Environmental Engineering Limited. Unit to be installed with 82mm diameter P.V.C.u. vent pipe running
underground and terminated minimum 2500mm above finished ground level with a bird proof cage. P.V.C.u vent pipe
S07 167.735 TBA TBA Type B to be sleeved with 110mm dia. cast iron pipe, including brackets. Unit to be installed on a suitable concrete base slab
S08 167.630 TBA TBA Type B and backfilled with concrete in accordance with the manufacturers instructions with a reinforced concrete cover slab
S09 167.500 TBA TBA Type B
Flow restrictor valve (to Structural Engineers details) complete with extension turrets and 1No heavy duty manhole cover and frame.
@ 15 litres per
second
BELOW GROUND DRAINAGE
FOUL WATER DRAINS 167.600+
All below ground drainage to be Hepworth SuperSleve/HepSleve vitrified clay, flexible jointed pipes to B.S.65:1981
+167.540 installed in accordance with B.S.8301:1985 and all relevant Codes of Practice. All pipes passing through foundation
MH Ref Cover Level Invert level MH Size Depth MH Cover Comments walls to be protected with concrete lintels providing minimum 50mm clearance all round the pipe. Openings to be
+167.820 masked both sides with rigid sheet material prior to backfilling. Pipes under concrete floor slab to be encased in
F01 168.600 TBA TBA Type A S08
S09 minimum 150mm concrete with movement joints formed using compressible board at each joint face. All drains, the
crown of which are within 600mm of the underside of the car park formation to be laid in Class `X' bed and surround
+167.665 (concrete encased) with flexible joints at each joint face,
168.080+ 167.450+
S07
Head of foul drain to be ventilated via 50mm diameter PVC-u vent pipe located within cavity of external wall. Vent pipe
+167.955 to be terminated at roof level discharging to outside air via RAL: 9006 Louvred vent in cladding.
Storm Water Attenuation Tank 167.610+ S06 Maintain a minimum distance of 2000mm from building to nearest drain where possible.
Existing tree size / design and specification to
retained Structural Engineer's details For details of bed and surround to drainage pipes refer to drawing no.s 305 and 306
+167.835
All drainage connections to access gullies and road gullies be 100mm diameter unless noted otherwise.
S
BP
167.350+
ROAD GULLIES
167.475+
Drainage to car park to comprise Hepworth 400mm diameter x 750mm deep vitrified clay Road Gullies complete with
rodding access and trap Ref: RGR3 with Stanton 100mm deep Pedestrian hinged gully grating
+167.680
DRAINAGE CHANNELS
168.115+
Birco 100, 200mm deep (10/0) x 1000mm long pre cast concrete, linear drainage channel units Ref: 8103 with rolled
galvanised steel angle protection by Marshalls Mono Ltd, Hoveringham. NG14 7JX. Tel: 01636 832000. Drainage
channels to discharge into underground drainage system via Birco 100 In-line Outfalls with 150mm side trap Ref: 8172.
+168.570 375mm depth to invert.
+168.265 Car park drainage channels to have Birco 100, colour coated (signal white), 'Heelsure' 100x6mm slotted, cast iron
gratings Ref: 8134. Service Ramp drainage channels to have Birco 100, 100x12mm slotted, cast iron gratings Ref: 8132.
S05
+168.445 All gratings to be 500mm long and secured to the channel units with minimum 4No. M12 stainless steel, allen key type,
security bolts (supplied by Marshalls Mono Ltd.). Allen key to be handed over to Architect at end of project.
e
Lin
All drainage channels are to be capable of supporting 400kN, Class D400 wheel loading to DIN19580, laid strictly in
ng
ildi 167.700+ accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and recommendations.
+168.400
Bu
+168.520
STORM WATER COLLECTION
Connection to
91No Approx. All storm water to discharge into underground
existing foul drain
attenuation tank to be sized, designed and supplied by
Car Parking specialist.
167.500+
168.670+
+168.545 Spaces
Site Approx.
+168.720
+168.780
Sew
Eas er
eme 168.250+ +167.640
nt
+168.780 S01
167.600+
S04
168.385+
+168.260
167.810+
+168.430 167.650+
+168.265
+168.390
168.600+
F01
Se
Eas wer
+167.865
167.985+
eme Dalkin Scotton Partnership
ALDI STORE nt Architects Limited
168.600+
Siphonic
drainage from
CONCEPT II PLANNING ISSUE
167.950+
roof 167.700+
+168.075 S03
S02
(18.3 x 55m)
+168.100
+167.975
+167.900
FFL 168.780
A Building repositioned to allow for new rear retaining wall, car park adjacent to loading bay reconfigured, 06/03/15 SPK JW
front of car park revised to suit retaining wall. Levels amended.
Revision Description Date Drawn Checked
167.750+
tor
cep
ter
l In
Fue
168.000+
+167.480
+168.100
CLIENT
ALDI STORES LIMITED
STORM WATER DRAIN
Foul drainage
PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
FOUL WATER DRAIN rodding eye PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY.
EXISTING COMBINED SEWER TITLE
PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN
PROPOSED 82mm DIA VENT PIPE
BPS / Fuel Intercepter
BY-PASS SEPARATOR DATE 11-02-2015 SCALE 1:200 @ A1 DRAWN SPK CHECKED JW
Klargester Class 1 by-pass separator from
car park, fuel interceptor from loading bay
ramp DWG No.
Y11A18 - P004 REVISION
A NORTH10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0.1
ARCTIC CIRCLE
PLANT
F F
E METER
CLEANERS
CUPBOARD
FREEZER MEETING
NIGHT CHILLER STAFF ROOM ROOM
STORE LOCKER
ROOM
(20 Pallets) (20 Pallets)
PLANTROOM WELFARE BLOCK
WAREHOUSE LOBBY (including Plant Rm) 126m²
(including Loading
Bay & Freezers)
E.1
323 m² MANAGERS
OFFICE
CUSTOMER/ FEMALE MALE
DISABLED WC WC
WC
E E
SF4 SF5 SF4 11250x880
Standard Chill 14 Bay Chiller 17500 Milk Chiller (RIM) Milk Chiller (RIM) EP DP DP DP DP
1875x880 1875x880 Spirits / Wines / Beers
2500 2500
Eggs Sugar x Alcohol x
Chiller Chiller Chiller 1 E Pallet Home 4 D Pallets
Protector Protector Protector Baking
(80mm) (80mm) (80mm)
LOADING BAY Over Freezer 15000 Over Freezer 5000
Shelf Baskets
D.1 S2 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S2 S2 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S2 Cleaning x Divider Pet Food x Papers x 4 E Pallets
S1 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S1 S1 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S1 2 D Pallets Tissues
4 D Pallets SF2 3750x880
Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen SF4 2500x880 SF4 SF4 EP EP EP EP Papers SF3
Freezer 8 Freezer 7 Freezer 6 Freezer 5 Freezer 4 Freezer 3 Freezer 2 Freezer 1 DP DP Pet Food DP DP DP DP 1250x880
Pet Food
Cleaning 1250x880 1250x880
SF2 3750x880
SF5 7500x880 SF5 Nappies
Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen Athen DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP Baby
Health & Beauty 1250x880
BIN Freezer 10 Freezer 11 Freezer 12 Freezer 13 Freezer 14 Freezer 15 Freezer 16 Freezer 17
STORE S1 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S1 S1 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S1 Detergents x 8 D Pallets
S2 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S2 S2 Refer to Over Freezer Merchandising Plan S2 Shelf
D Divider D
Baskets
RETAIL AREA
1006.5 m²
82 81 80 79
78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
Reduced
SF4 5000x880
Specials
Specials
Specials
Specials
Specials
SF4 5000x880
High Textile Specials Baskets
Value Rail
62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Specials (43 - 82) 43 21 Specials (1 - 42)
Half
Produce
C Table C
Crackers Soft Drinks x 27 D Pallets
Herb Herb
Shelf Shelf SF4 SF5 6875x880
DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP DP FOS x DP
1250x880 Confectionery Flower
2 D Pallets
SF2 7500x880 Stands DP
SF4 SF4 5000x880 SF5 SF4 Cereals
Crisps Biscuits DP DP SF2 7500x880
1250x880 1250x880 1250x880
Baskets
Snacks / Milk x Lunch Cereal
Half Produce (24 Tables + 2 ½ Tables) Crisps 2 D Pallets Box Bars
Produce
Table
250mm min Chiller Chiller
for Fire Protector Protector
Extinguishers (80mm) (80mm) Tins x Tea / Coffee /
2 D Pallets Spreads Hot Chocolate
1250
Produce Chill 10 Bay Chiller 12500 SF4 4375x880
DP DP SF4 6250x880 SF3 2500x880 SF3 5000x880 SF4 5000x880 SF5 2500x880 SF4 SF4
Tinned Ready Meals / Meat / Soup / Veg Magazine
International Food Ambient Bread Fresh Bread Fresh Cakes / Fresh Bread Ambient Cakes 1875x880 2500x880
Stand
B B
ENTRANCE
EXIT LOBBY
LOBBY
A
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
CLIENT
ALDI STORES LIMITED
Dalkin Scotton Partnership
Architects Limited
PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY.
PLANNING ISSUE TITLE
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN.
DATE 10-02-2015 SCALE 1:100 @ A1 DRAWN SPK CHECKED JW
DWG No.
Y11A18 - P200 REVISION NORTHEXTERNAL FINISHES
A B C D E F
10
1b
Illuminated Sign
2
subject to separate
planning application
1c
1b
SHOPFRONT ELEVATION FACING PRIORY ROAD
10 10
1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1b
1 Illuminated Sign
2 2 2 subject to separate
planning application
1c 1c 1c 1c
Fire exit
keep
clear
4 8 1 1 1 1
5 5 1b 1b 1b 1b
DISABLED
REFUGE
MAIN ELEVATION FACING CAR PARK
10 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 3
5 5 5
REAR ELEVATION
10 10
Illuminated Sign
subject to separate
2 planning application CLIENT
ALDI STORES LIMITED
1 1 1 1 Dalkin Scotton Partnership
Architects Limited
PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY
PLANNING ISSUE TITLE
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
DATE 10-02-2015 SCALE 1:100 @ A1 DRAWN SPK CHECKED JW
LOADING BAY ELEVATION FACING BIRMINGHAM NEW ROAD NOTES
Please refer to Structural Engineers drawings for
DWG No.
Y11A18 - P201 REVISION NORTH
details of steel frame.LEGEND
BPC BLOCK PAVING (MARSHALLS KEYBLOK PENCIL EDGE, CHARCOAL) SINGLE LIGHT LIGHTING COLUMN
BPB BLOCK PAVING (MARSHALLS KEYBLOK PENCIL EDGE, BRINDLE)
PBP PERMEABLE BLOCK PAVING (MARSHALLS PRIORA, CHARCOAL)
RK RAISED KERB DOUBLE LIGHT LIGHTING COLUMN
EK EDGING KERB
FK FLUSH KERB
DK DROP KERB EXISTING TREE
TK TRANSITION KERB
TRK TRIEF (SAFETY KERB) KERB
Retaining wall TTK TRIEF (SAFETY KERB) TRANSITION KERB NEW TREE
1500mm htwith ET ARGELITH FEINSTEINZEUG R12
Metal 'bow top' fencing Retaining wall (DARK GREY TILES 198x198mm).
1500mm ht - powder TP TACTILE PAVING NEW LOW LEVEL LANDSCAPING
2100mm ht with
coated black on top Metal 'bow top' fencing TB TELESCOPIC BOLLARDS
1500mm ht - powder SSB STAINLESS STEEL BOLLARD
coated black on top +100.000 PROPOSED LEVEL
HDB HEAVY DUTY BOLLARD
BC BRUSHED CONCRETE
Retaining wall
BG BOUND GRAVEL EXISTING LEVEL
2100mm ht with
167.600+ Metal 'bow top' fencing T TARMAC
+167.540 1500mm ht - powder GI GRAVEL INFILL
RK coated black on top
+167.820
RK
ACCESS ARRANGEMENTS
BPC
+167.665 This statement relates to the access arrangements for the Aldi Food Retail Store and details the
168.080+ BPC 167.450+
arrangements for all modes of transport to and from the store. It also includes details of how level access
arrangements are achieved and how the entrance to the store operates. This statement is to be read in
T conjunction with the separate Design and Access statement.
RK
+167.955
The proposed car park is accessed directly from Priory Road.
167.610+
Low level Existing tree
knee rail retained
There are 91No proposed car parking spaces including 6No Disabled car parking spaces,
RK +167.835 6No Parent and Child spaces, and 6No cycle stands (12No cycles)under the illuminated canopy,
Retaining wall
RK 1800mm htwith provided within the proposal designated for the retail store and local linked shopping trips.
T Metal 'bow top' fencing
167.350+
1500mm ht - powder Between the entrance tarmac finish and the tarmac car park is a flush kerb. The store access is via a set of
167.475+
Y
LA
coated black on top
automatic sliding opening entrance doors with a clear opening of 1100 mm and glazing manifestations giving
SP
BPC BPC BPC
TY
full access to all customers and staff. The junction between the retail store finished floor level and external
LI
BI
+167.680 conservation finishes is a flush transition detail and fire exit doors have either ramped egress or external
SI
RK
VI
T
T 168.115+ RK Retaining wall 1500mm ht
staircases with disabled refuges as indicated on the plan.
with Metal 'bow top' fencing
1500mm ht - powder coated The general car parking is laid out to a gradient of no more than 1:40 (1:60 across disabled bays) which
black on top prevents any loss of loaded trolleys and also allows for easy access to the store frontage from any area
T BPC
+168.570 within the car park.
T
+168.265
For cyclists there are unobstructed covered cycle stands provided (below the entrance canopy) adjacent to
RK the glazed shopfront.
T
+168.445 RK Contained within the site are designated delivery points, service areas, bin storage and turning facilities for
Retaining wall the retail store HGV and rigid commercial (milk) vehicle.
1050mm ht with
e
Lin
Metal 'bow top' fencing
T There is an extensive network of local public transport links and local facilities located within walking
ng T 1500mm ht - powder
167.700+
ildi
coated black on top distance of the development.
+168.400
Bu
+168.520
T T 89No Approx.
Car Parking
167.500+
SSB +168.545
168.670+
SSB Spaces
SSB TK FK
SSB
SSB
SSB +168.720
BPC
Site Approx.
SSB
T SSB
+168.780 SSB FK BPC
T
SSB 168.250+ +167.640
SSB
SSB
+168.780 SSB
ET BPC
167.600+
AY
SSB FK
PL
SSB
YS
T
LIT
ET T SSB
IBI
SSB RK
VIS
SSB
T SSB FK
SSB TK
168.385+ SSB
+168.260
167.810+
SSB
ET
SSB
ET
+168.430 167.650+
+168.265
Retaining wall +168.390
1050mm ht with
Metal 'bow top' fencing 168.600+ Metal 'bow top' fencing
1500mm ht - powder T 1500mm ht - powder
coated black on top coated black
T RK
RK +167.865 Dalkin Scotton Partnership
167.985+ RK
ALDI STORE Architects Limited
Escape stairs
168.600+ CONCEPT II RK with disabled
refuge
PLANNING ISSUE
167.950+
167.700+
+168.075
T
(18.3 x 55m) RK
+168.100
+167.975
BPC
+167.900
GI RK
2.4m ht Paladin
FFL 168.780 T
T
fence and lockable B Vehicle entrance from Priory Road adjusted to suit Connect Consultants' drawing. Car park adjusted to 15-06-15 SPK JW
gate with internal suit. Car Park numbers reduced by two to 89No.
panic latch push A Building repositioned to allow for new rear retaining wall, car park adjacent to loading bay reconfigured, 06/03/15 SPK JW
RK
pad overide. front of car park revised to suit retaining wall. Levels amended. Notes added.
T
Revision Description Date Drawn Checked
RK
167.750+
BC
GI
RK
Metal 'bow top' fencing
BIN 1500mm ht - powder
STORE
168.000+ coated black
+167.480
GI RK
+168.100
CLIENT
ALDI STORES LIMITED
REFRIGERATION
PLANT PROJECT
THE KING ARTHUR,
BC PRIORY ROAD, DUDLEY.
GI
Retaining wall
TITLE
PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
approx. 6000mm ht
2.4m ht Paladin fence and lockable
DATE 10-02-2015 SCALE 1:200 @ A1 DRAWN SPK CHECKED JW
gate with internal panic latch push
pad overide. DWG No.
Y11A18 - P003 REVISION
B NORTHYou can also read
