Progress in the implementation of national Geospatial Data Infrastructure in the Americas Working Group SDI - Macarena Pérez García - Cepal
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Progress in the implementation of national
Geospatial Data Infrastructure in the
Americas
Working Group SDI
Macarena Pérez García
GENERAL To Coordinate the actions related to the implementation, development and promotion of the Geospatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) of the Member States of UN-GGIM Americas. SPECIFIC A. To Diagnose the current status (2018) of the National Geospatial Data Infrastructures in the region, considering the components of the SDIs. B. To Design evaluation and monitoring tool regarding the state of progress of the National SDIs of the region. C. To Spread initiatives and good regional practices in the field of IDES, generating a basic guideline document regarding the operation of SDIs. D. To Promote and carry out training and improvement instances in the region regarding different components of the SDIs.
GENERAL CONTEXT It is possible to understand a Regional advances in this area are disparate, Geospatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) as and largely respond to initiatives that a collection of technologies, policies address the particular reality, giving answers and institutional arrangements that to situations of natural risks, cadastral facilitate the availability and access to surveys or others, being a mission for UN- spatial or geographic information (GI) GGIM Americas, to contribute in the definition of regional policies that are linked to the Global Framework.
OBJETIVES 2019
OBJETIVES RESULTS TIME LINE
B. Design evaluation and Regional diagnostic survey of
monitoring tool regarding the initiatives in terms of use,
progress status of the standards and other elements *Report Marzo 2019- Junio 2019
Regional SDI associated with the use of IDES *Dashboard
in the region.
• Matrix of
C. Disseminate regional information (related
initiatives and good practices with 2018-2019
in the area of IDES, Systematization of information. survey)
generating a basic guideline Web documentation repository Julio 2019- Diciembre 2019
document regarding the
operation of SDI * Web documentation
repository Julio 2019- Diciembre 2019
Disseminate regional initiatives
and good practices in the area
of SDI
4 Countries / Survey
Request for the
countries (JUNE 2019)
Matrix of information
(related with 2018-
2019 survey)
Web documentation
repository
Who will answer the Representative of each country in the
survey?
regional committee.
*For example the professional in charge of the SDI
what do we want to know?
State of the components of the
SDI
how will we show
the results
Design an indicator
Dynamic
Dashboard.
Design evaluation and monitoring tool regarding the progress status of the Regional SDI
Structure
STATISTICS /
of the survey 2019
GEOSPATIAL
INFORMATION
- Instrument design (2018)
- Applied during the months of
ACADEMIC
NETWORK May to June 2019.
- 27 countries responded.
Examples
How many digital data is available
Structure of the
for viewing on the platform of the
Geospatial Data Infrastructure in
survey
your country? Components
LEGAL AND POLICY/
GOVERNANCE / 14
INSTITUTIONS
SDI HUMAN RESOURCES 3 1. SDI general indicator
2. indicators by
6 component
TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION/
34 total NORMS AND 9
STANDARDSGeneral Results
SDI Implementation level 2019
Survey 2019
30% 30%
22%
15%
4%
Inicial En ejecución Concreto Operacional Óptimo
Inicial En ejecución Concreto Operacional Óptimo
Porcentajes de estado de implementación a partir de categorías
Indicador IDE 2019
Inicial En ejecución Concreto Operacional Óptimo
51.8 51.8
41 41 41
33.3
26
18.5 18.5
18.5
15
11.1 11.1
7.4 7.4
4 4
0 0 0
Institucionalidad Recursos HumanosInformación y estándares TecnologíaDashboard 2019
Comparative analysis of general results:
regional IDE indicators years 2018-2019
Estado comparativo indicador IDE en porcentajes año 2018-
2019
IDE 2018 IDE 2019
33
30 30
26
22
18 18
15
4 4
Variabilidad indicador IDE regional años
Inicial En ejecución Concreto Operacional Óptimo 2018 - 2019
30%
ALTO
IGUAL
Total de países que 52%
responden ambas SUBE / HIGH IGUAL /EQUAL BAJA /LOW BAJO
encuestas
18%
27 (100%) 14 (52%) 5 (18%) 8 (30%)
Presentación
KPI Presentación positiva 70%
negativa 30%Dashboard 2019
Final thoughts ➢ Regional challenge in both the application of an indicator ➢ About the preliminar results … a challenge to understand or explain the results ➢ The importance of every country participate, study the results. Share the information of good practices and examples. NEXT TASKS - 2019 results analysis / UN GGIM Americas Oct. - Repository
You can also read
