Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi

Page created by Bernard Mitchell
 
CONTINUE READING
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
Vegetation Canopies – a
New Approach to Urban
   Flood Mitigation

   Dato’ Ahmad Fuad Embi
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
CONTENTS
1.Background of KL Flooding
2.Hard Engineering - Dams and channelization
3.SMART Tunnel and Ponds
4. Soft Approach – Vegetation Canopies
       Rehab for catchment
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
KL FLOOD 1911

                Sultan Abd Samad Bldg
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
KL FLOOD 1971

Central Market
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
Sg Klang and its Tributaries
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
Raised by 10 ft and Gates
                       built over spillways

Klang Gates Dam
Flood Control works 1979
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
Batu Dam
completed 1984

             Primary function: flood control
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
TEPU BINA 1988

KLANG VALLEY
URBANISATION
1984
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
TEPU BINA 1994

KLANG VALLEY
URBANISATION
1994
Vegetation Canopies - a New Approach to Urban Flood Mitigation - Dato' Ahmad Fuad Embi
TEPU BINA 1998

KLANG VALLEY
URBANISATION
2004
SUBANG JAYA
A dense housing suburb with conventional ‘rapid disposal’
drainage, and large areas of impermeable surface
Runoff from storms rapidly reaches main drains in
minutes.
Typical concrete-lined main drain from old housing area –
          rapid disposal of stormwater to river
Growth of Elevated Highways
  to ease traffic congestion –
increasing rapid runoff to river
RIVER CHANNELIZATION
• Started as solution to flooding problem
  after major flood in 1971
•‘Rapid disposal’ concept – increase capacity
  and quickly dispose of flood waters.

                         MASJID JAMEK
Concrete lined channels throughout
KL – 1970s, 80s, 90s
Very high cost, single objective
Light Rapid Transit (LRT) lines 1990s
- occupying river berms, retarding high flows
BUT.. Klang River (& tributaries) continued to
 flash-flood, and with increasing frequency

               SRI MUDA, KLANG 1998
MEAN ANNUAL FLOOD ANALYSIS for SG.
KLANG – shows alarming trend

                                                                       3116430 KLANG RIVER AT SULAIMAN BRIDGE
                                                           TEST FOR STATIONARITY OF SERIES OF ANNUAL MAXIMUM DISCHARGES
                                               16,000
 CUMULATIVE MASS OF ANNUAL MAXIMUM DISCHARGE

                                               14,000

                                               12,000
                                                              Mean annual flood: Sg. Klang
                                                              @Jamb. Sulaiman shows huge
                                               10,000                  increase
                                                                148 → 440 cumecs (3X)
                     (m3/s)

                                                8,000

                                                6,000
                                                                                                                           Mean annual flood = 440 m3/s
                                                4,000

                                                                                                        Mean annual flood = 148
                                                2,000
                                                                                                        m3/s

                                                   0
                                                    1910    1915   1920   1925   1930   1935   1940   1952   1957   1963    1968   1974   1979   1986   1991   1996
                                                                                                             YEAR
SMART (Stormwater Mgt
and Road Tunnel)
proposed as structural
solution 1998

• cost 1.6 Billion Ringgit
• privatised road tunnel
        3 km in middle
• stormwater tunnel length
10 km
• expected usage 2 – 5
        times a year
• one of the largest
        tunnels in world
• completion end 2006
• supplemented by Batu
        Pond diversion
SMART
TBM No.1 –
SOUTH DRIVE

   Tunnel Boring Machine break-through, June 2005
BATU & JINJANG DETENTION PONDS
( RM 600 M project)

                         80 cumec                                                                290 cumec
                                        150 cumec
                                                           Lencongan Gombak (3.375 km)    275 cumec
                           Kolam
                         Takungan                           Kolam Takungan
                           Jinjang                                Batu
                         (2.5 mcm)                             (4.5 mcm)

             100 cumec
 125 cumec                                      35 cumec     35 cumec
                                                                               Kolam Kg
                                                                                 Puah

                                     65 cumec
             Kolam Kg
             Benteng
             (0.4 mcm)

                                                               PWTC
                                                                                     Masjid Jamek

                                                                   350 cumec
SG. BATU FLOOD DETENTION POND
NEW PROBLEM: NEED FOR FUTURE
     RETROFITTING TO REVIVE URBAN RIVERS

•30 years of extensive concrete lining
•Monotonous uniformity bad for habitat – no bends, loops,
meanders, pools, rapids, esp. greenery
•No gravels or stones on riverbed for egg-laying
•No rocks or tree stumps for fish shelter.
MANAGING URBAN
STORMWATER
•   Air quality much improved –
                          exhaust from millions of vehicles .
                      •   Decrease noise levels
                      •   Cools air temp. & UHI effects
                      •   Soil better protected.
                      •   Better habitat & biodiversity.
                      •   More CO² absorbed from the air in
                          the city.
                      •   Can reduce up to 40% of urban
                          flash floods

                      •   Rehab catchment NOT introduce
                             more Hard Engineering
                      •   Malaysia’s commitment to Climate
                                 Change Accord

Vegetation Canopy
         - Benefits
• 15 to 30 different species of trees and
Miyawaki            shrubs planted together.
                • has structure of a mature natural forest.
urban forests   • Is a multi-storey structure, with different
                   levels of vegetation.
                • Such Forest has many benefits in
                   ecosystem services.
Grows min. of 1 m /yr without fertilizers.
200 years for forest to recover on its own.
Miyawaki method: 20 years.
2000 world-
    wide
 Miyawaki
  projects
KL
Low density vegetation, few bushes
Grass cut too short, thin topsoil , exposed
Rapid and high runoff –
Frequent flash floods
UN Decade on Ecosystem
Restoration (2021-2030)
Trees and forests are a critical part
of the solution to the climate crisis
and biodiversity collapse.

The World Economic Forum
mobilize global community to grow
one trillion trees by 2030.
nature-based solutions in support

1t.org
conservation, restoration and
reforestation
You can also read