WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION

Page created by Valerie Jennings
 
CONTINUE READING
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY:
              A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
                   ZHOU CHENG XIE                                                            STUART J. BARNES
                  University of East Anglia                                                 University of East Anglia
                   Norwich NR4 7TJ UK                                                        Norwich NR4 7TJ UK

                            ABSTRACT                                       time. Specifically, we examine four airlines operated in the UK
                                                                           — British Airways. Virgin Atlantic, easyJet, and Ryanair — to
    Web site quality is now considered a critical factor to attract        identify the improvement in their Web site quality over time on
customers' attention and build loyalty. Based on a review of               aspects of usability. Web site design, service quality, information
the literature, this study focuses on five dimensions of Web               quality, and enjoyment. The research is retrospective and utilises
quality — usability, web site design, service quality, information         the Web archive or 'WayBack Machine" at www.archive.org in
quality, and enjoyment. The aim of this research is to identify the        onier to access pages for evaluative purposes in the years 1999,
development of Web site quality in four UK airlines based on the           2002 and 2005. The research approach is largely descriptive, but
research dimensions during the period from 1999 to 2005. For               with some statistical testing for significant changes over time. We
this purpose, the survey utilised the Web archive (www.archive.            hope to obtain some insight into the competitiveness between the
dig) for retrospective analysis (n= 120). According to the findings,       examined airlines with regards to the quality of their respective
the four airlines have improved their Web site quality on the four         Web sites.
dimensions in quite different ways during the period from 1999                 The paper is organised as follows, In the next section we
to 2005. One of the main conclusions of this study is that the             provide a literature review, including an overview of Web site
airlines have specific advantages from their particular mix of             quality, relevant theories and concepts related to the research area.
Web site attributes. The paper rounds off with conclusions and             Next, we describe the methodology, including the instrument.
implications for research and practice.                                    data collection and analysis. In section 4. the findings of this
   Keywords: Web site: quality; airline industry; longitudinal             research are presented and then discussed in section 5. Finally, in
                                                                           the last section, the paper provides conclusions from this research,
                          INTRODUCTION                                     including implications for future research and practice.

    The globalization of economic activities and widespread                                   LITERATURE REVIEW
availability of the Internet across the world has led multinational
firms to use their corporate Web sites to communicate and transact             In this section, we briefly review some earlier research
extensively with visitors from different parts of the world [7]. The       related to Web site quality instruments. Following a summary of
airline industry is no exception to the e-commerce phenomenon              previous work in this area, we provide an integrative model for
[22]. Most airlines have established their own Web sites in order          our research.
to 'bypass' travel agent intermediaries, becoming increasingly
focused on online communication, information and transactions.             Web site quality instruments
    As the airlines have increasingly utilised e-commerce as part
of their competitive strategies, so too has the importance of Web              Various instruments have been developed for evaluating the
site quality risen to the fore. Web site quality plays an important        different aspects of Web site quality. A number of these are
role in attracting and retaining customers — underpinning                  shown in Table 1 and described briefly below.
Web site effectiveness [22]. Web site quality is a relatively ill-
defined concept [lj. The existing scientific research discusses the           • Liu and Amett [17[ surveyed Webmasters for Fortune
meaning of Web site quality in terms of a variety of different                   1000 companies to ascertain the factors critical to Web
aspects. For example, Bames and Vidgen (4| examine Web site                     site success with consumers. The result was five factors:
quality in terms of usability, site design, information quality,                quality of information (which refers to relevant, accurate,
tmst and empathy; Yoo and Donthu [26) identify ease of use,                     timely, customized and complete information); service
aesthetic design, processing speed and security: Wolfinbarger and               (measured by quick response, assurance, empathy, and
Gilly [25[ examine Web site design, reliability, privacy / security             follow-up); system use (including security, correct
and customer service; Parasuraman et al. [21 ] include efficiency,              transactions, customer control over transactions, order-
system availability, fulfilment and privacy; and Flavian et al. ¡ 10[           tracking, and privacy); playfulness (typically enjoyment,
utilise usability, trust and user satisfaction. Clearly, it is necessary        interactivity, presence of attractive features, and flow
for airlines to grasp many aspects of customer perceptions of Web               or concentration): and design of the Web site (in terms
site quality in order to increase visitors and thus sales.                      of hyperlinks, customized search functions, speed of
    In this paper, we attempt to answer the question "What are                  access, and ease of correcting errors).
the key dimensions of Web site quality for airlines and how do                • WebQual™. Loiacono et at. |I81 designed an instru-
these differ between airlines and over time?" To this end, we will              ment to evaluate retail Web site quality. The instrument
ereate a measure, i.e. an instrument, of airline Web site quality               assessed 12 components of retail Web quality: infor-
in order to evaluate and test the results of Web site change over               mational lit-to-task, interactivity, trust, response time.

                     50                        Journal of Computer Information Systems                Winter 2008-2009
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
design appœal, intuitiveness. visual appeal, innovative-                        types of Web sites. In Barnes and Vidgen [3], a total
   ness,flow-emotionalappeal, integrated communications,                           of 380 student respondents evaluated online book-
   business process, and viable substitute. She used a                             stores, using an instrument with 22 questions. Based on
   36-item scale to test 800 college students on Web                               exploratory factor analysis, five dimensions emerged:
   sites selling books, music, airlines tickets and hotel                          usability, design, information quality, trust and
   reservations. Although the instrument possesses strong                          empathy.
   validity and reliability, students had not necessarily ever                   • .comQ. Wolfinbarger and Gilly [24| used focus groups,
   made a purchase at the site they evaluated. Therefore,                          sorting and a customer panel to develop the .comQ
   they did not rate an actual purchase and the role of                            instrument. Using concepts and attributes from both
   customer service and delivery in producing a quality                            the service quality and retailing literatures, their scale
   experience could not be investigated [25].                                      contains 14 attributes in four factors: Web site design
   SiteQual. This instrument was developed by asking                               (including personalization), reliability (including
   students in two marketing classes to generate appropriate                       accurate product description, on-time delivery, and
   questions. Fifty-four unique items were generated,                              order accuracy), privacy/security, and customer service
   forming the basis for an instrument completed by 69                             (referring to solving problems, willingness to help
   students for three self-selected sites [26]. Using a process                    and prompt answers to queries). Using concepts and
   of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis this was                        attributes from both the service quality and retailing
   whittled down to 9 items measuring ease of use, design,                         literatures, their scale contains 14 attributes in these
   processing speed, and security. A validation study with                         four factors.
   47 subjects each, evaluating 4 sites (n = 187), resulted
                                                                                 • Kim and Stoel [ 16], in their more simplified instrument,
   in reliabilities in the range 0.69 to 0.83 and good fit
                                                                                   include three of the factors of Loiacono [18] plus
   indices. SiteQuaPs original set of items is narrowly
                                                                                   three slightly different factors — entertainment, web
   based and thus possibly excludes some key factors [18],
                                                                                   appearance and transaction capability. The instrument
   and the authors did not investigate customer service or
                                                                                   is tested with a large sample and demonstrates good
   delivery issues [25].
                                                                                   reliability and validity.
   eQual 4.0. cQua! 4.0 (previously called WebQual 4.0)                          • E-S-Qual and E-RecS-Qual. These two scales were
   has been iteratively developed over time. The authors                           developed for assessing the full cycle of service quality
   have used the instrument on student and customer                                for online B2C e-commerce Web sites. The E-S-Qual
   samples to assess the quality of a number of different                          scale developed in a 22-item scale of four dimensions:

                                        TABLE 1: Instruments for measuring Web site quality
Instrument             Authors                                                                        Dimensions
                                                                  1. Quality of Infomiatioii            4, Playfulness perceived by cnnsumcrs
Not named              Liuand Arnett [17]                         2. Service                            5. Design of the Website
                                                                  3. System use
                                                                  I. Informational      fit-to-task      7. Visual appeal
                                                                  2. Interactivity                       8. Innovativeness
                                                                  3. Trust                               9. Flow (emotional appeal)
WebQual™               Loiacono et ah [18]                        A. Response Time                       10. Integrated Communication
                                                                  5. Design Appeal                       11. Business Process
                                                                  6. Intuitiveness                       12. Substitutability
                                                                  1. Easy of use                        3. PrtKessing speed
SiteQual               Yoo and Donthu [26]
                                                                  2. Aesthetic design                   4. Security
                                                                  1. Web site design                    3. Privacy / security
.comQ                  Wotfinbarger and Gilly [24]
                                                                  2. Reliability                        4. Customer service
eQual 4.0                                                         1. Web site usability
(previously            Barnes and Vidgen [3]                      2. Information quality         •
WebQual 4.0)                                                      3. Service interaction
                                                                  1. Web appearance                      4. Transaction capability
Not named              Kim and Stoel [16]                         2. Entertainment                       5. Response time
                                                                  3. Informational fit-to-task           6. Trust
                                                                  Core e-SQ                              Recovery e-SQ
E-S-Qual /                                                        1. Efficiency          '               1. Responsiveness
E-RecS-Qual            Parasuraman, et al. [21]                   2. System availability                 2. Compensation
                                                                  3. Fulfilhnent                         3. Contact
           1
                                                                  4. Privacy

                  Winter 2008-2009                  Journal of Computer Information Systems                                  51
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
efficiency, fulfilment, system availability, and privacy.              Proposition 3: The service quality of airline Web sites
      Tbe second E-RecS-QUAL scale contained three                           will tend to increase over the period of study.
      dimensions {responsiveness, compensation, contact)                     Proposition 4: The information quality of airiine Web
      with an 11 -item scale. Tbe scales were empirically tested             sites will tend to increase over the period of study.
      by using questionnaires distributed to sample of users of              Proposition 5: Tbe playfulness or enjoyment of airline
      the most visited Web sites in the USA — amazon.com                     Web sites will tend to increase over tbe period of
      (n=653) and walmart.com (n=205) [21].                                  study.

Research framework and propositions
                                                                                             METHODOLOGY
    Looking across instruments and the literature, there are
clearly a number of core features that a good quality Web                 Tbis section briefly details bow tbe research was designed and
site should possess [6] [12] [14] [23]. First, an effective Web        conducted.
site should serve as a major source of information; provide
complete information on the products and services; and allow           Instrument development
for quick access to information through tools like search engines.
Customers also demand appropriate levels of service interaction           Based on the literature review and Figure 1, this research
including customer service, personalisation and ease of contact        focuses on five constructs for survey development:
in the event of a problem. Furthermore, a Web site should
incorporate appropriate security measures and adopt privacy               • Usability (USAB) is related to human-computer
practices in order to develop customers" trust. In addition, a Web          interaction and is concerned with how the user perceives
site should be easy to navigate and typically have aesthetic appeal         and interacts with a Web site. It is derived from the
and an appearance that is appropriate for the organisation. Such
                                                                            eQual 4.0 [3]. In tbis study, there are 4 items measuring
features also contribute to enjoyment or emotional appeal, which
                                                                            usability.
beip to create flow [18] and retain tbe customer. In summary, the
                                                                          • Web site design (DESI) is based on tbe user-perceived
core features described above can be divided into 5 dimensions:
                                                                            Web quality instrument of Aladwani and Palvia [ 1 ] and
usability. Web site design, service quality, information quaiity
                                                                            Kim and StoeKs [16] analysis, which contain items for
and enjoyment (see Figure I ).
                                                                            Web site content and Web site appearance. There are 8
    In order to formaüy determine changes in Web site quaÜties              items used to measure this research construct.
over time, this research adopted a numl)er of propositions for            • Service quality (SERV) is emphasized by Bames and
statistica! testing. We refer to these as propositions rather than          Vidgen [3] and Liu and Amett [17] In their research
hypotheses due to the nature of samphng and testing in this                 instruments to measure Web site quality, ¡n this study,
study; a!tbough the overall sample is 120, only 10 respondents              service quality is measured by a 7-item instrument.
were available in each time period. The propositions tested are as        • Information quality (INFO) is also emphasized by
foUows:                                                                     Bamcs and Vidgen [3] and Liu and Amett [17] in their
                                                                            research instruments. In tbis study, information quality
   • Proposition 1: The usability of aidine Web sites will                  is again measured by 7 items.
     tend to increase over tbe period of study.                           • Playfulness or enjoyment (PLAY) comes from the
   • Proposition 2: TTie Web site design quality of airline                 Liu and Amett"s [17] framework, Ethier's [9] emotion
     Web sites will tend to increase over the period of                     system in using a Web site, and Kim and Stoel" s [16]
     study.                                                                 research, which involves tbe context of consumer
                                                                            behaviour. In this study, we use three items to measure
                                                                            this factor.
       UsabiUty
                                                                           Each questionnaire consisted of two sections. In the first
                                                                       section of tbe survey, respondents were asked to evaluate various
       Website
                                                                       aspects of Web site quality for an airline company in a time
       Design
                                                                       period. It consisted of 29 items measuring user's perceptions of
                                                                       the 5 dimensions of Web site quality. The second section solicited
                                                     Website           demographic information such as age, gender and occupation.
       Service                                       Quality
       Quality
                                                                       Respondents were also asked about: (1) tbe number of years
                                                                       they had been using the Intemet; and (2) how many times they
                                                                       typically use the Internet each week or day. Experienced onüne
     in format ioD
                                                                       users are perhaps more likely to point out their perceptions about
        Quality                                                        multip!e attributes of a Web site, so tbis technique allowed us to
                                                                       ensure that respondents possessed sufficient experience to answer
                                                                       questions about their perceptions of attributes [!6].
     PUyfulim» or
      Enjoyment                                                        Background on the airlines examined

                                                                          The research focuses on the four major airünes operating in
FIGURE 1: Framework for evaluating Web site quality                    the UK in the air travel market:

                     52                     Journal of Computer Information Systems              Winter 2008-2009
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
• British Airways          (http://www.britishairways.com/          total, 70 members of www.speedsurvey.com responded within
     travel/home/public/en gb). British Airways is the                 two weeks. Since the research utilises small, longitudinal samples,
     largest airiine in the United Kingdom. It is also the             it was not possible to examine the two populations for bias, e.g.,
     third largest airline in Europe, with more flights from           using ANOVA.
     Europe across the Atlantic than any other operator. Its               Each respondent was asked to evaluate an airiine Web site
     main hubs are London Heathrow and London Gatwick.                 in one year. Respondents were asked to evaluate sites using a
     British Airways' worldwide route network covers some              7-point scale where the anchors are from 7 (= strongly agree) to
     233 destinations in 96 countries. The company has                  1 (= strongly disagree), where 4 is neutral. All responses were
     succeeded in growing revenues faster than costs: total            received within a two week period during August 2006. The
     revenue rose 9.6% to £8.5 billion in the tax year to              online questionnaire responses were received via email, filtered
     March 2006 [15].                                                  to check for duplicates and converted into Microsoft Excel and
   • Virgin Atiantic Airways fhttp://www.virgin-atlantic.              SPSS for analysis. The analysis included a mixture of descriptive
     com/en/gb/index.jsp) is part of Richard Branson's                 and graphical procedures as well as statistical testing.
     Virgin Group. Virgin Group owns 51% of the airline,
     and Singapore Airiincs owns the other 49% stake. It is                                       FINDINGS
     the UK's second largest operator of long-haul scheduled
     flights, with an ever-increasing network of flights                    In this section we briefly describe the sample and general
     branching out to four different continents from their              trends before testing the propositions and examining reliability.
     main hubs at Heathrow and Gatwick airports in London
     [11|. Virgin Atlantic reported revenues of £1.91 billion           Description of tiie sample
     in the tax year to 2006 [19].
   • easyJet (http://www.easyJet.com) is Europe's leading                   In total 120 responses were received — 10 responses for each
     low-cost airiine. It provides high frequency services on           airline company in each of the three years. Respondents consisted
     short-haul and medium-haul point-to-point routes within            of 55 (45.8%) students. 58 (48.3%) employed persons and 7
     Europe from its three airport bases at London Luton,               (5.8%) unemployed persons. Also, 111(92.5%) of respondents
     Liverpool and Geneva. The airline operates frequent                indicated that they had previously visited the Web site being
     scheduled services for leisure and business passengers             evaluated before. Related to Internet use, 69 (57.5%) respondents
     and serves more than 200 routes between more than 75               used the Internet more than once per day; 80 (66.7%) respondents
     European airports. Revenues in 2006 were £2.8 billion              had more than 7 years of Internet use experience and 19 (27.5%)
     [8]-                                                               respondents had 5 to 6 years of experience. Overall, the majority
   • Ryanair thttp://www.ryanair.com) is an Irish airline               of respondents are frequent, experienced Internet users and likely
     headquartered in Dublin, although its biggest operational          to be relatively good judges of Web quality.
     base is at London Stansted Airport. It is one of Europe's
     largest low-cost-carriers, operating more than 300                 General trends
     routes between 130 airports in 21 Europiean countries.
     Its main hub is London Stansted Airport, with 88 routes.               Table 1 shows the changes over time in the five constructs for
     Over the years it has evolved into a profitable airiine            the individual and combined datasets for all four airlines. Let us
     because online booking has increasingly contributed                first consider the combined dataseL As we can see, there is a clear
     to the aim of cutting flight prices by selling direct to           trend for improvement over time — with means between 3.58
     passengers. Gurrently, the Web site accounts for 95%               and 3.92 in 1999, between 4.72 and 4.96 in 2002 and between
     of total bookings [2]. Revenues in 2006 were £1.7                  5.35 and 5.61 in 2005. However, this trend varies considerably by
     billion.                                                           construct; for example, in the final time period, 2005, information
                                                                        quality and playfulness both appear to buck the trend of previous
Operationaiization of the survey                                        years and move considerably ahead in the perceptions of users.
                                                                        Examining the changes in the rankings of the various constructs
    Due to time and resource constraints for this study, an online      confirms this; while usability was ranked top in 1999 and 2002,
survey was used, offering rapid operation and low cost. Data            it fell to second place in 2005, being pushed out by information
for this study were collected via an Internet survey instrument         quality, which was only ranked 4th in previous years. Similarly,
(www.speedsurvey.com). The Internet survey web site, www.               playfulness, ranked 5th in previous years was joint 3rd in 2005,
speedsurvey.com, provides easy and professional survey design           while service fell to rank 5.
and data collection facilities.                                             This trend is less easy to decipher between the three time
    The research was further complicated since there were 12            periods, because of varying increases in constructs. However, if
versions of the questionnaire that needed to be completed;              we look at the rankings for 1999 and 2005, where improvements
each airline Web site in each year was evaluated to collected           are most marked, there are definitely some clear differences. Both
10 responses, i.e. 120 responses overall. The procedure was             B A and Ryanair bear out the trend in information quality. EasyJet
as follows. First, invitation emails were sent to 50 potential          and Ryanair, the budget airlines, bear oui their image and clear
respondents, and each of these email messages had a link to a           demonstrate the rise in the importance of playfulness (to 2nd
questionnaire embedded within it. Second a popup invitation             place). British Airways clearly bucks the trend in the other three
letter with a hyperiink to the Web page with questionnaires             airlines away from service quality, which is firmly in joint second
was posted on the www.speedsurvey.com Web site. The letter              place.
explained the purpose of the study and encouraged the users                 These trends in the qualities ofthe various Web sites are more
to participate iti the survey to evaluate Web site quality. In          clearly repre.sented in Figure 2.

                    Winter 2008-2009                Journal of Computer Information Systems                        53
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
TABLE 1: Trends in constructs over time
 Airline            Construct     1999     Rank       2002     Rank        2005      Rank
 British Airways    USAB          4.05       1       5.18       1         5.35         4
                    DESI          3.76       5       5.00       3         5.43         2
                    SERV          3.91       4       5.10       2         5.43         2
                    INFO          3.96       3       4.97       4         5.84         1
                    PLAY          4.00       2       4.50       5         5.40         5
 Virgin Atlantic    USAB          3.95       1       4.38       1         5.70         2
                    DESI          3.63       3       4.03       2         5.78         1
                    SERV          3.79       2       4.00       3         5.40         5
                    INFO          3.47       4       3.96       4         5.66         3
                    PLAY          3.13       5       3.83       5         5.57         4
 Easyjet           USAB           4.45       1       4.33       5         5.93         1
                   DESI           4.13       2       4.66       2         5.34         4
                   SERV           3.60       4       4.43       4         5.24         5
                   INFO           3.89       3       4.53       3         5.50         3
                   PLAY           3.60       4       4.67       1         5.53         2
 Ryanair           USAB           3.23       5       5.98       1         5.28         5
                   DESI           3.70       2       5.41       5         5.40         2
                   SERV           4.11       1       5.70       3         5.34         4
                   INFO           3.29       4       5.44       4         5.44         1
                   PLAY           3.57       3       5.87       2         5.40         2
 OVERALL           USAB           3.92       1       4.96       1         5.56         2
                   DESI           3.80       3       4.78       3         5.48         3
                   SERV           3.85       2       4.81       2         5.35         5
                   INFO           3.65       4       4.73       4         5.61         1
                   PLAY           3.58       5       4.72       5         5.48         3

                                                                                     USAB
                                                                                     DESI

                                                                                     PLAY

                                                                                  Key:
                                                                                  time

j                                                                     s
                                                                                  periods:
                                                                                  {I)1999;
                                                                                  (2) 2002:
                                                                                  (3) 2005:
                                                                                  cases:
                                                                                  (1) British
                                                                                  Airways;
                                                                                  (2) Virgin
                                                                                  Atlantic;
                                                                                  (3) easyJet;
                                                                                  (4) Ryanair

FIGURE 2: Summary of airline Web site evaluations in the three time periods

54                  Journal of Computer Information Systems               Winter 2008-2009
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
TABLE 2: T-tests for changes to constructs over time (significant results in bold)
             Airline               Construct         TltoT2           T2toT3              Tl to T3     Proposition (Tl to T3)

             British Airways       USAB                0.00            0.34                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   DESI                0.00            0.07                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   SERV                0.00            0.19                 0,00             Confirmed
                                   INFO                0.13            0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   PLAY                0.24            0,04                 0.01             Confirmed
             Virgin Atlantic       USAB                0.26            0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   DESI                0.13            0,00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   SERV                0.44            0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   INFO                0.17            0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                   PLAY                0.06            0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
             EasyJet                USAB                0.06           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    DESI                0.00           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    SERV                0.00           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    INFO                0.01           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    PLAY                0.00           0.01                 0.00             Confirmed
             Ryanair                USAB                0.00           0.01                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    DESI                0.00           0.97                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    SERV                0.02           0.11                 0.51            Disconfirmed
                                    INFO                0.00           1.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    PLAY                0.00           0.07                 0.00             Confirmed
             OVERALL                USAB                0.00           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    DESI                0.00           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    SERV                0.00           0.00                 0,00             Confirmed
                                    INFO                0.00           0.00                 0.00             Confirmed
                                    PLAY                0.00           0,00                 0,00             Confirmed

Test of propositions                                                      only factor that did not improve over the entire study period —
                                                                          service quality. Clearly this says something about the nature of
    Now that we have established that there is a general trend            the airline's offering.
towards quality improvement and towards emphasis on different
patterns of qualities, both over time and for the different air-                               TABLE 3: Reliabifity analysis
lines, we tum our attention to a formal test of our propositions.
                                                                          Research Construct             Questions         Cronbaches Alpha
We use the term proposition in preference to hypothesis due to
the limited dataset. To formally examine the improvement in                   Usability                      1-4                 0.76
qualities over time, a t-test was conducted both for each air-
line and for the overall dataset over time. Table 2 shows the             Design                            5-12
significance levels resulting from t-tests for means between 1999         Service                          13-19
(Tl ) and 2002 (T2), 2002 and 2005 (T3). and 1999 and 2005 (for
propositions).                                                            Information                      20-26                 0.87
    Table 2 clearly demonstrates very significant changes (p
WEB SITE QUALITY IN THE UK AIRLINE INDUSTRY: A LONGITUDINAL EXAMINATION
of five times the number of variables according to Hair et               consumers' behaviours on airline Web sites, and distinguishing
al. [13]).                                                               between the behaviours of various types of consumers (e.g., goal-
                                                                         focused versus experiential shoppers).
                          DISCUSSION
                                                                                                  REFERENCES
    Clearly the priorities of airline customers appears to be
changing. As the self-service, no-frills and low-cost trend for          [1]      Aladwania A.M. and P.C. Palvia. "Developing and
air travel has grown in recent years in the UK. so consumers                    validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived Web
have been driven less by service quality and more by easy                       quality." Information and Management, 39:6. 2002. pp.
access to good information packaged in an entertaining and                      467-476.
fun "wrapper'. This appears to be a trend in other areas of              [2]    Answers.com. "Ryanair," available from: http://www.
Web activity [3], Ryanair rated particularly badly for service                  answers.com/topic/ryanair (accessed June 30, 2006).
quality and it was the only quality from any airline that did            [3]    Bames S.J. and R.T. Vidgen. "An integrative approach
not improve significantly during the study period. British Air-                 to the assessment of e-commerce quality." Journal of
ways appears to be an exception and rates service quality in                    Electronic Commerce Research, 3:3, 2002, pp. 114-127.
second place; BA is. of course, the only genuine premium airline         [4]    Bames S.J. and R.T. Vidgen. "Data triangulation and Web
in the cases and is more service-focused as a company. In terms                 quality metrics: a case study in e-govemment," Information
of absolute scores. British Airways had the best achievement                    and Management, 43:6, 2006. pp. 767-777.
in service and information quality from its Web site in 2005.            [5]    Buhalis, D. "eAirlines: strategic and tactical use of ICTs in
Virgin Atlantic reached the highest level of Web site design and
                                                                                the airline industry," Information and Management, 41:7,
improved enjoyment more rapidly; easyJet had the best usability
                                                                                2004, pp. 805-825.
of any Web site based on user perceptions and improved service
                                                                         [6]    Cappel, J.J. and Z.Y. Huang. "A usability analysis of
quality to the greatest extent. Clearly, overall, the airlines have
                                                                                company websites". Journal of Computer Information
pursued different strategies for their Web sites over the period
                                                                                Systems, 48:1. 2007, pp. 117-123.
of study. Tbis is also confirmed in other studies of airlines use of
                                                                         [7]    Chakraborty.D., S.K. Jaiswal, A. Misray, and A. A. Nanavati.
electronic commerce [5].
                                                                                "Middleware architecture for evaluation and selection of
                                                                                3rd-party Web services for service providers," ICWS '05:
              SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS                                           Proceedings ofthe IEEE International Conference on Web
                                                                                Services, Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society. 2005,
    This study aimed to identify whether UK airline Web sites                   pp. 647-654.
have improved over the time period from 1999 to 2005. The                [8]    Digital Look. "EasyJet," available from: http://www.
development of an instrument consisted of a consolidation of                    digitallook.com/companyresearch/14263/easyJet/
related studies that had already developed and validated Web                    company_research.html (accessed June 30, 2006).
site quality instruments. Tbe assessed Web sites were British            [9]    Ethier, J., P. Hadaya, J. Talbot, and J. Cadieux. "B2C Web
Airways. Virgin Atlantic. easyJet, and Ryanair. The findings                    site quality and emotions during online shopping episodes:
of this study revealed that the quality of all four Web sites bas               an empirical study," Information and Management, 43:4,
improved between tbe years of 1999 and 2(X)5. Specifically, the                 2006, pp. 627-639.
findings confirm that different airline companies have pursued           [10]   Flavian, C , M. Guinaliu, and R. Gurrea. "The role played
different paths in their approaches to Web site quality.                        by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on
    This study is one ofthe first to utilise retrospective Web quality          website loyalty," Information and Management, 43. 2006,
assessment by means ofthe Weh archive t www.archive.orgl. It is                 pp. M 4 .
the only one in the area of airlines Web sites. The archive resource     [II]   Flight Mapping. "Virgin Atlantic flights: airline profile
presents tremendous opportunities for longitudinal analyses that                and routes information." available from: http://www.
were previously unthinkable, although it also presents numerous                 flightmapping.com/airlines/Virgin/ (accessed July 25,
opportunities for bias, as all retrospective research does. However,            2007).
careftil management and selection of subjects can help to manage         [12]   Green D. and J.M. Pearson. "Development of a Web site
and reduce this bias to provide meaningful results. We believe                  usability instrument based on ISO 9241-11." Journal of
that the Web archive is a valuable resource and deserves furtber                Computer Information Systems, 47:1. 2006. pp. 66-72.
attention for Web quality re.search.                                     [13]   Hair, J.F.J., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black.
    There are a number of limitations of this research which                    Muhivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Englewood
provide avenues for future research. A key limitation is the                    Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
sample used. The sample of )20 persons is considered small and           [14]   Huang, E. "The acceptance of women-centric websites,"
included only 10 responses for each airline web site in each year.              Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45:4. 2005, pp.
Future work will attempt to collect a sufficiently large sample                 75-83.
to perform factor analysis. Second, the instrument used might            [15]   investment Ideas. "British Airways: FY 2006 results",
not be regarded as comprehensive; further research will help to                 available from: http://investmentideas.co.uk/2(X)6/05/19/
further develop and validate the instrument, Since the study is                 british-airways-fy-2(K)6-results/ (accessed September 30,
based on a particular market, the UK. further research should be                2006)
considered to compare airline Web sites for different countries          [16]   Kim, S. and L. Stoel. "Dimensional hierarchy of retail
from different continents such as China, Germany and the US.                    website quality." Information and Management, 41:5,
Other aspects of consumer behaviour might also be considered,                   2004, pp. 619-633.
such as the impact of branding, how the various dimensions affect        [17]   Liu. C. And K. Amett, K. "Exploring the factors associated

                     56                       Journal of Computer Information Systems               Winter 2008-2009
with Web site success in tbe context of electronic                          sites: method and application," Journal of Computer
        commerce " Information and Management, 38:1, 2(XX), pp.                     Information Systems, 44:3, 2004. pp. 17-25.
        23-33.                                                               [23]   Tarafdar M. and J. Zhang. "Analysis of critical website
[ 18]   Loiacono, E.T., R.T. Watson, and D.L. Goodbue. WehQual:                     characteristics: A cross-category study of successful
        A Web Site Quality ¡nstrtmient. Working Paper 2000-126-0,                   websites," Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46:2,
        University of Georgia, 2000.                                                2005, pp. 14-24.
[19]    M-trave!. "Business travellers !ift Virgin Atlantic's    financia!   [24]   Wolfinbarger. M. AndM.C.GiNy.Cítni^.Díme/iAiOTio/íCí/ig,
        performance." avai!ab!e from: http://www.m-trave!.com/                      Measuring and Predicting Quality of the E-taÍlÍng
        news/2006/06/business_trave!.html (accessed September                       Experience. Working Paper No. 02-100, Marketing Science
        29. 2006).                                                                  Institute. 2002.
[20]    Nunnally, G. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-                  [25]   Wo!finbarger, M. and M.C. Gilly. "Etailq: dimensionaüzing,
        Hill, 1978.                                                                 measuring and predicting etai!qua!ity,"yoH/-naío//íew/7i>!g,
[2!]    Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml, and A. Malhotra, A. "E-S-                   79,2003, pp. !83-!98.
        Qual: a mu!tiple-item sca!es for assessing e!ectronic service        [26]   Yoo, B. and N. Donthu. "Developing a scale to measure
        quality," Journal of Service Research, 7:3, 2005, pp. 213-                  the perceived service quality of Intemet shopping sites
        233.                                                                        (SiteQual)," Quarterly Journat of Electronic Commerce,
[22]    Shchiglik, C, and S.J. Bames. "Evaluating airlines Web                      2:1, 2001, pp. 31-47.

                       Winter 2008-2009                Journal of Computer Information Systems                           57
You can also read