A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021

Page created by Dwight Bradley
 
CONTINUE READING
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
A new era of discoveries from
astrophysical multimessengers

 Miguel Mo afá

 Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy — May 18, 2021
 st
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Outline
 The Messenger

 • Current status

 • Next generation

 • First multimessenger results?

 AMO

 • Introduction

 • Archival analyses

 • Real-time coincidences

 • Prospects
N

 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group)
 Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 (2012) Duldig, Science 314 (2006) 429-430

Current status
 3
 10
• hadron
 ∆ E/E=20%

 photons m-2 s-1 sr-1]
•
 2
 10

• neutrinos
 1.6

 HiRes 1
 E F(E) [GeV

 UHECRs
• gravitational waves HiRes 2
 10
 Telescope Array 2011
 2.6

 Auger 2011
• dark matter
 1
 18 19 20
 10 10 10
 E [eV]
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
• hadron

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
• hadrons

• photon

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
 HAWC sky map
 E > 500 GeV (~4 years of data)
 Full array
• hadrons

• photon

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 Fermi-LAT sky smoothed map
 E > 50 GeV (Pass 8 - 6 years of data)
 (courtesy of M. Ajello)
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
• hadrons

• photon

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrino

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrino

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
A new era of discoveries from astrophysical multimessengers - Virtual Seminar on MultiMessenger Astronomy - May 18, 2021
Current status
 • hadrons

 • photons

 • neutrino

 • gravitational waves

 • dark matter
 ANTARES
Image by François Montanet - Uploader was Jmarino at de.wikipedia, CC BY-SA 2.0 fr, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7926479
 s
Current status
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational wave

• dark matter
 s
Current status
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
Future
• hadron

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photon

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photon

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrino

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrino

• gravitational waves

• dark matter

 Copyright Edward Berbee/Nikhef
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational wave

• dark matter
 s
Future
• hadrons

• photons

• neutrinos

• gravitational waves

• dark matter
First “multimessenger” results
First “multimessenger” results

 M. Ahlers, K. Murase,
 Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023010
First “multimessenger” results
 supernova remnants (|b| < 2± ) UMC (|b| < 10± , 30± < l < 220± )
 hypernova remnants (|b| < 2± ) IC-40 (g) (°10± < b < 5± , 280± < l < 330± )
 diffuse cosmic rays (|b| < 2± ) EAS-TOP (|b| < 5± , l 2 [40± ,111± ][[134± ,205± ])
 HiSCORE (5yrs, |b| < 2± ) Tibet (|b| < 2± , 20± < l < 55± )
 LHAASO (1yr, |b| < 2± ) Tibet (|b| < 2± , 140± < l < 225± )
 HAWC (3yrs, |b| < 2± ) CASA-MIA (|b| < 5± , 50± < l < 200± )
 CTA (100h, |b| < 2± ) Milagro (|b| < 5± , 40± < l < 100± )
 HEGRA (|b| < 5± , 0± < l < 255± ) Milagro (|b| < 2± , l 2 [30± ,65± ]([65± ,85± ]))
 HEGRA (|b| < 5± , 20± < l < 60± ) Milagro (|b| < 2± , l 2 [85± ,110± ]([136± ,216± ]))

 10°6

 HAWC

 E 2 Jg [GeV cm°2 s°1 sr°1 ]
 10°7

 10°8

 10°9
 M. Ahlers, K. Murase,
 Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023010
 100 101 102 103
 Eg [TeV]
First “multimessenger” results
Truly multimessenger studies!
The Astrophysical
 play

 Multimessenger
Observatory Network
The AMON concept
AMON provides the framework for:

• Real-time and near real-time sharing of
 subthreshold data among
 multimessenger observatories

• Real-time and archival searches for any
 coincident (in time and space) signals.

• Prompt distribution of alerts for follow-
 up observations

 https://www.amon.psu.edu/
 26
The AMON concept
AMON provides the framework for: AMON unifies and simplifies existing
 multimessenger efforts:
• Real-time and near real-time sharing of
 subthreshold data among
 multimessenger observatories

• Real-time and archival searches for any
 coincident (in time and space) signals.

• Prompt distribution of alerts for follow-
 up observations Astrop. Phys. Vol. 45, 56–70, 2013
 Astrop. Phys. Vol. 114, 68–76, 2020
 https://www.amon.psu.edu/
 27
The AMON concept
AMON provides the framework for:

• Real-time and near real-time sharing of
 subthreshold data among
 multimessenger observatories

• Real-time and archival searches for any
 coincident (in time and space) signals.

• Prompt distribution of alerts for follow-
 up observations

 https://www.amon.psu.edu/
 28
The Network
• Triggering: IceCube, ANTARES,
 Auger, HAWC, VERITAS, FACT,
 Swift-BAT, MAGIC, HESS

• Follow-up: Swift-XRT & UVOT,
 VERITAS, FACT, MASTER, LCOGT,
 MAGIC, HESS

• Pending: LIGO, PTF, TA, LHAASO,
 …

 https://www.amon.psu.edu/join/
 29
– 18 –– 18 –
 The Astrophysical Journal, 833:117 (8pp), 2016 December 10 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/117
 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

 Early archival analysis examples
 SEARCH FOR BLAZAR FLUX-CORRELATED TEV NEUTRINOS IN ICECUBE 40-STRING DATA
 C. F. Turley1,2, D. B. Fox2,3,4, K. Murase1,2,3,4, A. Falcone2,3, M. Barnaba3, S. Coutu1,2, D. F. Cowen1,2,3, G. Filippatos1,2,
 C. Hanna1,2,3, A. Keivani1,2, C. Messick1,2, P. Mészáros1,2,3,4, M. Mostafá1,2,3, F. Oikonomou1,2, I. Shoemaker1,2,
 M. Toomey1,2, and G. TešiĆ1,2
 • ’s + rays
 2
 (For The Astrophysical Multimessenger Observatory Network)
 1
 Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; cft114@psu.edu
 Center for Particle & Gravitational Astrophysics, Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
 3
 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
 4
 Center for Theoretical & Observational Cosmology, Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
 Received 2016 August 30; revised 2016 October 2; accepted 2016 October 5; published 2016 December 12
 ‣ IC40 and Fermi-LAT, A. Keivani et al., PoS (ICRC’15) 786 (2015)
 ABSTRACT
 We present a targeted search for blazar flux-correlated high-energy (en  1 TeV) neutrinos from six bright northern
 ‣ IC40/59 and Fermi-LAT: Astrophys. J. 863 (2018) 64
 blazars, using the public database of northern hemisphere neutrinos detected during “IC40” 40-string operations of
 the IceCube neutrino observatory (2008 April to 2009 May). Our six targeted blazars are subjects of long-term
 monitoring campaigns by the VERITAS TeV γ-ray observatory. We use the publicly available VERITAS light
 curves to identify periods of excess and flaring emission. These predefined intervals serve as our “active temporal
 ‣ IC40/59 and Swift-BAT sub-threshold (in progress)
 windows” in a search for an excess of neutrinos, relative to Poisson fluctuations of the near-isotropic atmospheric
 neutrino background, which dominates at these energies. After defining the parameters of an optimized search, we
 confirm the expected Poisson behavior with Monte Carlo simulations prior to testing for excess neutrinos in the
 actual data. We make two searches: one for excess neutrinos associated with the bright flares of Mrk421 that
 ‣ IC40 and VERITAS blazar TeV ares: Astrophys. J. 833 (2016) 117
 occurred during the IC40 run, and one for excess neutrinos associated with the brightest emission periods of five
 other blazars (Mrk 501, 1ES 0806+524, 1ES 1218+304, 3C 66A, and W Comae), all significantly fainter than the
 Mrk421 flares. We find no significant excess of neutrinos from the preselected blazar directions during the
 selected temporal windows. We derive 90% confidence upper limits on the number of expected flux-associated
 • rays + gravitational waves
 neutrinos from each search. These limits are consistent with previous point-source searches and Fermi GeV flux-
 correlated searches. Our upper limits are sufficiently close to the physically interesting regime that we anticipate
 that future analyses using already-collected data will either constrain models or yield discovery of the first blazar-
 associated high-energy neutrinos.
 ‣ words: BL Lacertae objects: general – BL Lacertae objects: individual (Markarian 421, Markarian 501) –
 SwiftKey
 cosmic rays LIGO
 and S5general
 – gamma-rays: (in–progress)
 neutrinos
 Supporting material: machine-readable table

 • ’s + rays 1.+INTRODUCTION
 cosmic rays correlated variability in their neutrino and EM emissions, or
 The IceCube Collaboration has instrumented a cubic kilo-
 sufficiently bright individual sources may (with time) be Fig. Fig. 2.— Times
 2.— Times of interest
 of interest for Markarian
 for Markarian 421. 421.
 TheseThese
 times times were selected
 were selected in ourininitial
 our initi
 identified as a priori interesting, astrophysically plausible EM optimization
 optimization as theasmost
 the most sensitive
 sensitive searchsearch for associated
 for associated neutrinos
 neutrinos (Sec 2.3).
 (Sec 2.3). The selectio
 The selection
 meter of Antarctic ice at the South Pole with 86 “strings” of
 sources that are coincident with a point-like or extended excess 4 10 24 cm 2 and yields an expecte
 ‣ PBH evaporation searches, G. Tešić, PoS (ICRC’15) 328 (2015)
 photomultiplier tubes, readout electronics, and an internal
 of neutrinos on the sky.
 includes
 includes 45.6 with
 45.6 days days awith a total
 total -ray fluence
 -ray fluence 10 ⇥
 of 4.1of⇥ 4.1 cm and yields an expected
 calibration system so as to detect high-energy (en  1 TeV) With respect to the first approach, γ-ray bursts (GRBs) have background
 background of 1.03ofneutrinos.
 1.03 neutrinos.
 neutrinos from atmospheric cosmic-ray showers and extra- long been considered promising candidates for high-energy
 terrestrial sources (Achterberg et al. 2006). Operations of the neutrino emission (Waxman & Bahcall 1997; Gao et al. 2013;
 • others… FRB + Swift: ApJL 832 (2016) L1
 79-string and full-strength 86-string facilities since 2010
 recently yielded discovery of a population of cosmic neutrinos
 Bustamante et al. 2015). Given the brief timescale for high-
 energy emission from the typical GRB and the precision
 30 timing
 (Aartsen et al. 2013a, 2013b, 2014a), validating the experi- of IceCube-detected neutrinos, known GRBs can be readily
 
 fl
Early archival analysis examples R.A. 3
 3

 BAT field of view; no FRBs occurred within the IBIS
 • ’s + rays field of BAT view. field For eachno
 of view; FRB FRBs with simultaneous
 occurred within the BAT IBIS
 97.5 100.0 102.5 105.0 5.0

 coverage,
 a
 field we of retrieved
 view. Forthe each relevant
 FRB with data simultaneous
 from the High- BAT 2.5
 Energy Astrophysics
 coverage, we retrieved Science the Archive
 relevant data Research from theCenter High-
 ‣ IC40 and Fermi-LAT, A. Keivani et al., PoS (ICRC’15)
 2 Astrophysics 786
 for(2015)

 Dec.
 Energy Science Archive Research 0
 (HEASARC ) and searched sources within 15Center of -55.0 0.0 S
 the FRB (HEASARC coordinates.
 2
 ) and This searchedradius foraccounts
 sources within for uncer- 150 of
 ‣ taintythe in FRB coordinates.
 the positions of both This the radius radio accounts
 sourcefor(typi-uncer-
 IC40/59 and Fermi-LAT: Astrophys. J. 863 (2018) 64 of both the radio source
 −2.5
 tainty in the positions
 cally localized to a single beam with FWHM ⇡ 150 ) and (typi-
 0 -52.5
 cally localized to a single
 the subthreshold BAT source candidates (having 90%- beam with FWHM ⇡ 15 ) and
 the subthreshold BAT0 source candidates (having 90%-
 ‣ IC40/59 and Swift-BAT sub-threshold (incontainment progress)

 BAT counts s–1 (15–50 keV)
 containment radii r90 ⇡ 7 ) that 0
 are observed in these 0.03
 b
 radii r90 ⇡ 7 ) that are observed in these
 data. 0.02
 data.
 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 832:L1 (9pp), 2016 November 20 We used the heasoft (v.doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L1
 6.18) software tools and cal-
 ‣ We used the heasoft (v. 6.18) software tools and cal-
 IC40 and VERITAS blazar TeV ares:ibration
 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
 Astrophys. for our
 ibration
 J.
 forhigh-energy
 833
 our high-energy
 (2016)
 datadata analyses 117
 analyses
 3
 . Swift
 3
 . SwiftBAT BAT
 0.01

 surveysurveydata data include detector
 include detectorplane planehistograms
 histograms (DPHs)
 (DPHs) 0.00
 DISCOVERY OF A TRANSIENT GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO FRB 131104
 of theoffull-bandpass
 the full-bandpass (15–195 (15–195keV)keV) 300300 s exposures
 s exposures and and
 • rays + gravitational waves
 J. J. DeLaunay1,3, D. B. Fox2,3,4, K. Murase1,2,3,4, scaled P. Mészáros 1,2,3,4
 detector
 scaled , A.plane
 detector Keivani 1,3
 , C.
 images
 plane Messick
 images (DPIs) 1,3
 , of the
 (DPIs) of the soft-band
 soft-band
 −0.01

 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3
 M. A. Mostafá , F. Oikonomou ,(15–50 G. TešiĆkeV) , and64C.s F. Turley
 exposures. We reduced these data using
 1 (15–50
 Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;keV) 64 s exposures.
 jjd330@psu.edu We reduced these data using
 −0.02
 2
 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvaniastandard standard procedures,
 State University, University Park, PA
 procedures, adopting
 16802, USA the the
 adopting maximummaximum allowed
 allowed
 ‣
 3
 Swift and LIGO S5 Cosmology,
 (in progress)
 −0.03
 Center for Particle & Gravitational Astrophysics, Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
 Institute for Gravitation and oversampling
 oversampling parameter University,of
 Stateparameter 10,
 of 10, and
 Park,and searched USA forfor
 searched can-can-
 4
 Center for Theoretical & Observational the Cosmos, Pennsylvania University PA 16802,
 Received 2016 September 26; accepted 2016 September 29; published 2016 November 11 Time after UTC 18:03:59 (s)
 didatedidatesources sources
 usingusing the the batcelldetect
 batcelldetect sliding-cell
 sliding-cell algo-algo-
 ABSTRACT rithm.rithm. This This routine routine
 uses useslocallocal estimates
 estimates of ofthethe back-back-
 • ’s + rays + cosmic rays
 We report our discovery in Swift satellite data of a transient ground ground
 gamma-ray and noise
 andcounterpart
 noise level level
 (3.2σ to identify
 toconfidence)
 identify thecandidate
 candidate
 to fast sources,
 sources, and and
 Figure1.1.
 Figure
 for the
 Swift BAT
 Swift
 transient
 BAT discovery
 discovery image
 gamma-ray
 image and
 counterpart
 for the transient gamma-ray counterpart to FRB 131104,
 and light
 to
 light curve
 FRB
 curve
 131104,
 radio burst (FRB) FRB 131104, the first such counterpart tothen any FRB.then Theperforms
 performs transient hasa apoint-spread
 a point-spreadduration T90  100
 functionfunction
 s and(PSF) (PSF) fit fit
 to to de-de- SwiftJ0644.5
 Swift J0644.5 5111.
 5111. (a) (a) Swift
 Swift J0644.5
 J0644.5 51115111 discovery
 discoveryimage
 image
 −6 −2 (15–150 keV; UTC 18:03:52 start; 300 s exposure), showing a small
 a fluence Sγ≈4×10 erg cm , increasing the energy budget for thisan
 rive event by more than
 accurate sourcea billion times; atand
 position the BAT counts esti- (15–150 keV; UTC 18:03:52 start; 300 s exposure), showing a small
 nominal z≈0.55 redshift implied by its dispersion rive measure,an theaccurate
 burst’s source
 gamma-ray position
 energy outputand BAT is counts esti- portion of the BAT field of view in tangent plane projection. The
 portion
 ‣ PBH evaporation search of the BAT field of view in tangent
 circle) isplane projection. The
 Eγ≈5×1051 erg. Thesearches, observed radio to G. Tešić, PoS mate.for(ICRC’15)
 We131104estimated 328 (2015)
 uncertainties in source positions region for FRB 131104 (black shown; regions with
 gamma-ray mate.
 fluence ratio We FRB
 estimated is uncertainties
 consistent with a in
 lower source positions search
Early archival analysis examples R.A. 3
 3

 BAT field of view; no FRBs occurred within the IBIS
 • ’s + rays field of BAT view. field For eachno
 of view; FRB FRBs with simultaneous
 occurred within the BAT IBIS
 97.5 100.0 102.5 105.0 5.0

 coverage,
 a
 field we of retrieved
 view. Forthe each relevant
 FRB with data simultaneous
 from the High- BAT 2.5
 Energy Astrophysics
 coverage, we retrieved Science the Archive
 relevant data Research from theCenter High-
 ‣ IC40 and Fermi-LAT, A. Keivani et al., PoS (ICRC’15)
 2 Astrophysics 786
 for(2015)

 Dec.
 Energy Science Archive Research 0
 (HEASARC ) and searched sources within 15Center of -55.0 0.0 S
 the FRB (HEASARC coordinates.
 2
 ) and This searchedradius foraccounts
 sources within for uncer- 150 of
 ‣ taintythe in FRB coordinates.
 the positions of both This the radius radio accounts
 sourcefor(typi-uncer-
 IC40/59 and Fermi-LAT: Astrophys. J. 863 (2018) 64 of both the radio source
 −2.5
 tainty in the positions
 cally localized to a single beam with FWHM ⇡ 150 ) and (typi-
 0 -52.5
 cally localized to a single
 the subthreshold BAT source candidates (having 90%- beam with FWHM ⇡ 15 ) and
 the subthreshold BAT0 source candidates (having 90%-
 ‣ IC40/59 and Swift-BAT sub-threshold (incontainment progress)

 BAT counts s–1 (15–50 keV)
 containment radii r90 ⇡ 7 ) that 0
 are observed in these 0.03
 b
 radii r90 ⇡ 7 ) that are observed in these
 data. 0.02
 data.
 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 832:L1 (9pp), 2016 November 20 We used the heasoft (v.doi:10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L1
 6.18) software tools and cal-
 ‣ We used the heasoft (v. 6.18) software tools and cal-
 IC40 and VERITAS blazar TeV ares:ibration
 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
 Astrophys. for our
 ibration
 J.
 forhigh-energy
 833
 our high-energy
 (2016)
 datadata analyses 117
 analyses
 3
 . Swift
 3
 . SwiftBAT BAT
 0.01

 surveysurveydata data include detector
 include detectorplane planehistograms
 histograms (DPHs)
 (DPHs) 0.00
 DISCOVERY OF A TRANSIENT GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO FRB 131104
 of theoffull-bandpass
 the full-bandpass (15–195 (15–195keV)keV) 300300 s exposures
 s exposures and and
 • rays + gravitational waves
 J. J. DeLaunay1,3, D. B. Fox2,3,4, K. Murase1,2,3,4, scaled P. Mészáros 1,2,3,4
 detector
 scaled , A.plane
 detector Keivani 1,3
 , C.
 images
 plane Messick
 images (DPIs) 1,3
 , of the
 (DPIs) of the soft-band
 soft-band
 −0.01

 1,3 1,3 1,3 1,3
 M. A. Mostafá , F. Oikonomou ,(15–50 G. TešiĆkeV) , and64C.s F. Turley
 exposures. We reduced these data using
 1 (15–50
 Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;keV) 64 s exposures.
 jjd330@psu.edu We reduced these data using
 −0.02
 2
 Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvaniastandard standard procedures,
 State University, University Park, PA
 procedures, adopting
 16802, USA the the
 adopting maximummaximum allowed
 allowed
 ‣
 3
 Swift and LIGO S5 Cosmology,
 (in progress)
 −0.03
 Center for Particle & Gravitational Astrophysics, Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
 Institute for Gravitation and oversampling
 oversampling parameter University,of
 Stateparameter 10,
 of 10, and
 Park,and searched USA forfor
 searched can-can-
 4
 Center for Theoretical & Observational the Cosmos, Pennsylvania University PA 16802,
 Received 2016 September 26; accepted 2016 September 29; published 2016 November 11 Time after UTC 18:03:59 (s)
 didatedidatesources sources
 usingusing the the batcelldetect
 batcelldetect sliding-cell
 sliding-cell algo-algo-
 ABSTRACT rithm.rithm. This This routine routine
 uses useslocallocal estimates
 estimates of ofthethe back-back-
 • ’s + rays + cosmic rays
 We report our discovery in Swift satellite data of a transient ground ground
 gamma-ray and noise
 andcounterpart
 noise level level
 (3.2σ to identify
 toconfidence)
 identify thecandidate
 candidate
 to fast sources,
 sources, and and
 Figure1.1.
 Figure
 for the
 Swift BAT
 Swift
 transient
 BAT discovery
 discovery image
 gamma-ray
 image and
 counterpart
 for the transient gamma-ray counterpart to FRB 131104,
 and light
 to
 light curve
 FRB
 curve
 131104,
 radio burst (FRB) FRB 131104, the first such counterpart tothen any FRB.then Theperforms
 performs transient hasa apoint-spread
 a point-spreadduration T90  100
 functionfunction
 s and(PSF) (PSF) fit fit
 to to de-de- SwiftJ0644.5
 Swift J0644.5 5111.
 5111. (a) (a) Swift
 Swift J0644.5
 J0644.5 51115111 discovery
 discoveryimage
 image
 −6 −2 (15–150 keV; UTC 18:03:52 start; 300 s exposure), showing a small
 a fluence Sγ≈4×10 erg cm , increasing the energy budget for thisan
 rive event by more than
 accurate sourcea billion times; atand
 position the BAT counts esti- (15–150 keV; UTC 18:03:52 start; 300 s exposure), showing a small
 nominal z≈0.55 redshift implied by its dispersion rive measure,an theaccurate
 burst’s source
 gamma-ray position
 energy outputand BAT is counts esti- portion of the BAT field of view in tangent plane projection. The
 portion
 ‣ PBH evaporation search of the BAT field of view in tangent
 circle) isplane projection. The
 Eγ≈5×1051 erg. Thesearches, observed radio to G. Tešić, PoS mate.for(ICRC’15)
 We131104estimated 328 (2015)
 uncertainties in source positions region for FRB 131104 (black shown; regions with
 gamma-ray mate.
 fluence ratio We FRB
 estimated is uncertainties
 consistent with a in
 lower source positions search
Archival analysis: IC+Fermi
 Coincidence parameters

 t = ±100 s

 ✓
Archival analysis: IC+Fermi

• Two ways to identify a coincidence signal:

 ‣ Look for excess of events with high log-
 likelihood values (real time search)

 ‣ Comparison of real and null distributions
 with the Anderson-Darling test

 34
Archival analysis: IC+Fermi
 • Developed a time sensitive coincident analysis for IceCube and Fermi data

 • Methods sensitive to

 ‣ rare high-multiplicity events; e.g., GRBs Details at arXiv:1802.08165
 ‣ a population of cosmic signals Turley et al., Astrophys. J. 863 (2018) 64
 • Found a potentially interesting (p = 4.7%) correlation between photon and neutrino populations

 • Analysis will be extended to

 ‣ cover all archival Fermi and IceCube data
 Details at arXiv:1904.06420
 W! ‣ ANTARES data! Ayala Solares et al., Astrophys. J. 886 (2019) 98
NE
 • Code for real-time analysis on the AMON servers is already approved and running!

 35
First online analyses & follow-ups
• Real-time notices

 ‣ HESE GCN notices went live in April 2016

 ‣ EHE notices followed in July 201

 ‣ HE from aring blazar

• Swift proposals

 ‣ X-ray and UV/optical counterparts to HE ’s

 ‣ X-ray and UV/optical counterparts to ’s + X- and -ray coincidences
 36
 
 fl
 
 6

 
First Notice example
To take advantage of multi-messenger opportunities, the IceCube neutrino observatory (13)
has established a system of real-time alerts that rapidly notify the astronomical community
of the direction of astrophysical neutrino candidates (14). From the start of the program in
April 2016 through October 2017, 10 public alerts have been issued for high-energy neutrino
candidate events with well-reconstructed directions (15). side view
 …
 The neutrino alert
IceCube is a neutrino observatory with more than 5000 optical sensors embedded in 1 km3 of
the Antarctic ice-sheet close to the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station. The detector consists
of 86 vertical strings frozen into the ice 125 m apart, each equipped with 60 digital optical
modules (DOMs) at depths between 1450 m and 2450 m. When a high-energy muon-neutrino
interacts with an atomic nucleus in or close to the detector array, a muon is produced mov- ing
through the ice at superluminal speed and creating Cherenkov radiation detected by the
DOMs. On 22 September 2017 at 20:54:30.43 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), a high-
energy neutrino-induced muon track event was detected in an automated analysis that is part
of IceCube’s real-time alert system. An automated alert was distributed (17) to observers 43
seconds later, providing an initial estimate of the direction and energy of the event. A
sequence of refined reconstruction algorithms was automatically started at the same time,
using the full event information. A representation of this neutrino event with the best-fitting
reconstructed direction is shown in Figure 1. Monitoring data from IceCube indicate that the top view
 0 500 1000 1500
 nanoseconds
 2000 2500 3000
 125m
observatory was functioning normally at the time of the event.

 17. IceCube Collaboration, GRB Coordinates Network/AMON Notices 50579430_130033 Figure 1: Event display for neutrino event IceCube-170922A. The time at which a DOM
 (2017). observed a signal is reflected in the color of the hit, dark blues for earliest hits and yellow for
 latest. Time shown are realtive to the first DOM hit according to the track reconstruction, and
 earlier and later times are shown with the same colors as the first and last times, respectively.
 The total time the event took to cross the detector is ⇠3000 ns. The size of a colored sphere is
 proportional to the logarithm of the amount of light observed at the DOM, with larger spheres
 corresponding to larger signals. The total charge recorded is ⇠5800 photoelectrons. Inset is an
 37
 overhead perspective view of the event. The best-fitting track direction is shown as an arrow,
IC170922

Credit: IceCube Collaboration/NSF
Multi-messenger observations of a aring blazar
 Optical rays (Fermi-LAT) VHE rays (MAGIC)

 “Multimessenger observations of a aring blazar
 coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A,”
 Science, Vol 361, Issue 6398, 13 July 2018
 41
 
 fl
 fl
Swift proposals

 10-1
 10-1

 10-1
 10-1

 10-1
 4 6 8 10 20 40 60 80 10
 10-1
 Time after Neutrino (ks
 4 6 8 10 20 40 60 80 10
 Time after Neutrino (ks

 42
1

1

3

2

3

2

 )

 )

 0

 0
Coincidence alert: IC+HAWC
• Proof-of-concept dataset (1 month)

 ‣ HAWC daily sub-threshold hotspots
 Parameters: position, error in position,
 signi cance (>2.75), start time of transit, end time
 of transit

 ‣ IC track-like events
 Parameters: position, time of event, false positive
 rate density (FPRD), signal acceptance, PSF

 43
 fi
Coincidence alert: IC+HAWC
• Temporal and spatial coincidence

• Best position of the coincidence
 1/year

• Combine p values using Fisher’s method

 1/year
• Account for different DoF for different multiplicities,
 and use -log[p( 2> 2obs)] to rank coincidences

 44
 
 
Coincidence alert: IC+HAWC

 Archival analysis at arXiv:2008.1061
 Ayala Solares et al., Astrophys. J. 906 (2021) 63
 45
Coincidence alert: IC+HAWC
• Moving to real-time analysis!

 ‣ Receiving ~1000 HAWC daily
 hotspot per day

 ‣ Receiving ~600 IC track-like
 events per day

 ‣ Finding ~150 coincidences
 per day

 46
VHE Notices
• Started receiving HAWC’s own
 GRB sub-threshold triggers

• Studied FARs

 ‣ internal a few/day

 ‣ send to GCN the 1/year events

 47
 
New alerts

• New GCN channel for IceCube-HAWC
 alerts

• New (separate) GCN channel for HAWC
 GRB-like notices (similar to the HESE
 or EHE IceCube notices)

 48 Alert from May 14, 2021
Coincidence alert: +GW
 ⊗ ⊗

 (Galactic coordinates)
LIGO simulated event HAWC exposure per 4 min GLADE galaxy catalog
 http://aquarius.elte.hu/glade/

• Joint likelihood ratio as a ranking statistics

• Fisher’s method to combine p-values
 49
 
Coincidence alert: +GW
 Proposed scheme GW

 HAWC
 TEMPORAL COINCIDENCE (500S WINDOW)
 HAWC TRIGGER
 • Real-time GRB search
 • 0.2,1,10,100s
 SPATIAL COINCIDENCE
 GW TRIGGER HAWC candidate is in the 90% GW area?

 LIKELIHOOD COMPUTATION

 GALAXY
 CATALOGUE
 P-VALUE OF THE DETECTION

 arXiv: 1603.07333v4

 ⊗ 4-layers information:
 • the posterior probability ρ
 • Distance estimate
 • Dispersion
 • Normalization 50
GLADE: galaxy distribution LIGO-Virgo map
 
GW outlook
• Running on:

 ‣ HAWC GRB-like sub-threshold triggers
 & HAWC hotspots

 ‣ LIGO-Virgo simulations of NS mergers

• Working on:

 ‣ Run over LIGO/Virgo archival data

 ‣ Preparing real-time analysis for next run

• Analyzing GW+(Swift sub-sub-threshold) coincidences,
 and X-ray follow-ups of +GW coincidences

 51
 
In development
AMON status
• First Multimessenger Alerts!

 ‣ IC+HAWC

 ‣ ANTARES+Fermi-LAT

• Pass-through Notices:

 ‣ Gold & Bronze IC events

 ‣ HAWC GRB-like events

 52
Sub-threshold cosmic rays, ’s,
 Prospects rays, and GWs in real time!

 HE ’s GW

 VHE rays

 UHECR
 53
 
 
AMON progress
• AMON has made a signi cant progress toward real-time and
 archival analyses

• AMON high-uptime servers are online and fully operational

• Fast distribution of IceCube alerts of likely cosmic neutrinos to
 GCN/TAN since 2016

• Started issuing - coincidence alerts (HAWC—IceCube and
 Fermi-LAT—ANTARES), as well as new pass-through channels
 (e.g., HAWC and ANTARES)

 54
 
 fi
Conclusions

 • Current generation detectors are fantastic!

 • Next generation detectors will be yuuge!

 • Multimessenger is the best way to make progress
 toward understanding the messages!

 Thank you!
Credit: Fabian Schüssler
You can also read