Aspiration Pneumonia Review Article - Amcli

Page created by Tyrone Tucker
 
CONTINUE READING
Aspiration Pneumonia Review Article - Amcli
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l    of   m e dic i n e

                                  Review Article

                                   Dan L. Longo, M.D., Editor

                         Aspiration Pneumonia
             Lionel A. Mandell, M.D., and Michael S. Niederman, M.D.​​

A
        spiration pneumonia is best considered not as a distinct entity                            From McMaster University, Hamilton,
        but as part of a continuum that also includes community- and hospital-                     ON, Canada (L.A.M.); and Weill Cornell
                                                                                                   Medical College, New York (M.S.N.). Ad-
        acquired pneumonias. It is estimated that aspiration pneumonia accounts                    dress reprint requests to Dr. Mandell at
for 5 to 15% of cases of community-acquired pneumonia, but figures for hospital-                  ­lmandell@​­mcmaster​.­ca.
acquired pneumonia are unavailable.1 Robust diagnostic criteria for aspiration                    N Engl J Med 2019;380:651-63.
pneumonia are lacking, and as a result, studies of this disorder include heteroge-                DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1714562
neous patient populations.                                                                        Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

    Aspiration of small amounts of oropharyngeal secretions is normal in healthy
persons during sleep, yet microaspiration is also the major pathogenetic mecha-
nism of most pneumonias.2 Large-volume aspiration (macroaspiration) of colo-
nized oropharyngeal or upper gastrointestinal contents is the sine qua non of
aspiration pneumonia. Variables affecting patient presentation and disease man-
agement include bacterial virulence, the risk of repeated events, and the site of
acquisition (nursing home, hospital, or community). According to this spectrum,
patients labeled as having aspiration pneumonia usually represent a clinical phe-
notype with risk factors for macroaspiration and involvement of characteristic
anatomical pulmonary locations. Aspiration syndromes may involve the airways or
pulmonary parenchyma, resulting in a variety of clinical presentations.3
    This review focuses on aspiration involving the lung parenchyma, primarily
aspiration pneumonia and chemical pneumonitis. Aspiration of noninfectious
material such as blood or a foreign body is also important. Aspiration pneumonia
is an infection caused by specific microorganisms, whereas chemical pneumonitis
is an inflammatory reaction to irritative gastric contents. Our understanding of
the interaction between bacteria and the lung has improved. We examine this
improvement, along with changing concepts of the microbiology and pathogenesis
of aspiration pneumonia. We also examine the clinical features, diagnosis, treat-
ment, and prevention of both aspiration pneumonia and chemical pneumonitis, as
well as the risk factors.

 Ch a nging Microbiol o gic a nd Patho gene t ic C oncep t s
               of A spir at ion Pneumoni a

Our understanding of normal lower-airway microbiota in humans has evolved with
the use of targeted polymerase-chain-reaction studies, sequencing of bacterial 16S
ribosomal RNA genes, and metagenomics. A recent study of oral microbiota in
patients with acute stroke identified 103 different bacterial phylotypes, 29 of which
had not been reported previously.4 Whether these new microbes are pathogens is
uncertain.
   The Human Microbiome Project has helped define the role that intestinal micro-
organisms play in the development of mucosal immunity and in the interplay
between health and disease. Studies of the lung microbiome have challenged our

                                  n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org    February 14, 2019                                                          651
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Aspiration Pneumonia Review Article - Amcli
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l     of   m e dic i n e

               assumptions of lung sterility and of bacterial ac-           such as glucocorticoids, have been shown in vi-
               cess to the lungs through aspiration (microaspi-             tro to promote the growth of S. pneumoniae and
               ration or macro­aspiration) and inhalation. Spe-             certain gram-negative rods.13-16
               cifically, genomic methods have defined a                        One hypothesis linking the airway microbiome
               complex taxonomic landscape of bacteria in the               with aspiration pneumonia is that illness may
               lung and revealed the presence of diverse com-               result in a change in the lung microbiota (dys-
               munities of microbiota. We are still learning                biosis), which may, in turn, interfere with or
               about the role of the microbiome in health and               impair pulmonary defenses. A macroaspiration
               disease, as well as in the pathogenesis of pneu-             event, particularly in a patient with risk factors
               monia.5,6 In the healthy state, the immune tone              for impaired bacterial elimination, such as re-
               of the airways and alveoli appears to be calibrated          duced consciousness or an impaired cough reflex,
               by the bacteria constituting the lung microbiota,            could then overwhelm the elimination side of the
               an observation recently reported in both healthy             immigration–elimination balance, further dis-
               humans and experimental animal models.7,8 Con-               rupting bacterial homeostasis and triggering an
               cepts of virulence have also changed; virulence              increase in a positive feedback loop leading to
               is defined as “the relative capacity of a microor-           acute infection.
               ganism to cause damage to a host.”9 Infection is                 Bacteria may colonize various sites in the hu-
               not simply the result of bacterial replication or of         man oral cavity, such as the gingiva, dental plaque,
               bacterial gene products; it is also a consequence            and tongue.17,18 Pathogenic bacteria, including
               of the host response, resultant inflammation,                gram-negative species that are not seen in the
               and tissue damage.9,10                                       normal host, may emerge in the elderly, as well
                   Models proposed to explain the possible role             as in patients in nursing homes or hospitals and
               of the lung microbiome in pneumonia include                  those with nasogastric tubes.19-21 Cleavage of cell-
               the adapted island model of lung biogeography,               surface fibronectin exposes receptors for gram-
               effects of environmental gradients on lung micro-            negative rods on underlying airway epithelial cells
               biota (e.g., regional differences in oxygen ten-             and is more closely correlated with host factors
               sion and nutrient availability in the lungs), and            such as acute illness than with the site of care.22
               finally, pneumonia as an emerging phenomenon                     In the 1970s, anaerobes with or without aerobes
               in the complex adaptive system of the lung micro-            were the predominant pathogens in aspiration
               bial ecosystem.11,12 The stability of the lung mi-           pneumonia.23-26 More recently, there has been a
               crobiome is probably maintained by a balance of              shift to bacteria usually associated with commu-
               immigration and elimination of bacteria and by               nity- and hospital-acquired pneumonias, and
               feedback loops. Immigration involves bacterial               anaerobes are recovered less frequently.26 One
               movement from the oropharynx to the lung pri-                study of aspiration pneumonia in patients in the
               marily by means of microaspiration, and elimi-               intensive care unit showed that in community-
               nation mainly occurs through ciliary clearance               acquired cases, the main isolates were S. pneu-
               and coughing. Negative and positive feedback                 moniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae,
               loops can suppress or magnify signals, respec-               and Enterobacteriaceae, whereas gram-negative
               tively, such as those for bacterial growth. An               bacilli, including P. aeruginosa, were found with-
               inflammatory event may lead to epithelial and                out anaerobes in hospital-acquired cases.27 An-
               endothelial injury, creating a positive feedback             other study assessed the incidence of anaerobic
               loop that can promote inflammation, disrupt                  bacteria in patients with ventilator-associated
               bacterial homeostasis, and increase susceptibil-             pneumonia and in those with aspiration pneu-
               ity to infection. The complex adaptive system                monia.28 Bacterial pneumonia was diagnosed in
               model suggests that acute bacterial pneumonia                63 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia
               results from enhancement of a growth-promoting               and in 12 patients with aspiration pneumonia.
               signal by a positive feedback loop. This may re-             Among patients with aspiration pneumonia, en-
               sult in a rapid shift from a diverse microbial               teric gram-negative organisms were isolated in the
               mixture to dominance by a single species (e.g.,              patients with gastrointestinal disorders, whereas
               Streptococcus pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa).12       S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae predominated in
               Various signaling molecules in humans, includ-               those with community-acquired aspiration events.
               ing neurotransmitters, cytokines, and hormones               Only one anaerobic organism was found, and

652                                                n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019

                                                The New England Journal of Medicine
      Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                                  Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Aspir ation Pneumonia

the authors questioned the need for anaerobic             tion at the time of extubation continue to have
coverage in both ventilator-associated pneumo-            this problem at the time of discharge.33
nia and aspiration pneumonia.28                               Additional risks include degenerative neuro-
    Studies of the elderly continue to show the           logic diseases (multiple sclerosis, parkinsonism,
trend away from anaerobes. A study involving 95           and dementia) and impaired consciousness, par-
institutionalized elderly patients with severe            ticularly as a result of stroke and intracerebral
aspiration pneumonia reported 67 pathogens.29             hemorrhage, which can also impair cough clear-
Gram-negative enteric bacteria accounted for              ance. The frequency of stroke-associated pneu-
49% of the pathogens, anaerobes for 16%, and              monia is related to the severity of neurologic
S. aureus for 12%. Aerobic gram-negative bacteria         illness and its associated immune impairment,
were found in conjunction with 55% of anaero-             with higher rates among patients requiring inten-
bic isolates. Another study, involving 62 elderly         sive care than among those admitted to a stroke
hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia,          unit.34 Impaired consciousness can also result
showed that of 111 bacteria identified, gram-             from drug overdose and medications, including
negative bacilli and anaerobes each accounted             narcotic agents, general anesthetic agents, certain
for 19.8% of the bacteria, and anaerobes and              antidepressant agents, and alcohol (Fig. 2A).
aerobes together were found in 66.7% of pa-               After adjustment for other risk factors, antipsy-
tients who died.30 It is unclear why the patho-           chotic medications increased the risk of aspira-
gens have changed, but it may be due to a shift           tion pneumonia by a factor of 1.5 in a study in-
in the demographic characteristics of patients            volving 146,552 hospitalized patients.35 Enteral
and earlier sampling today than in the past.              feeding can lead to high-volume aspiration, espe-
Prior studies often collected cultures later in the       cially when associated with gastric dysmotility,
illness, often after the development of empyema           poor cough, and altered mental status. In three
or lung abscess.1 This discussion does not apply          studies of enteral feeding after a stroke in a total
to chemical pneumonitis, which unlike aspiration          of more than 5000 patients, early tube feeding
pneumonia, is a noninfectious, inflammatory               improved survival, as compared with no feeding,
response of the airways and pulmonary paren-              and in the first 2 to 3 weeks after the stroke,
chyma to acidic gastric contents or bile acids.1,31       nasogastric tube feeding was associated with
                                                          improved survival and functional outcomes, as
                                                          compared with percutaneous enteral tube feed-
                 R isk Fac t or s
                                                          ing.36 Enteral feeding tubes are not currently
Aspiration is often the result of impaired swal-          recommended for patients with dementia.37
lowing, which allows oral or gastric contents,                Patients with multiple risks have increased
or both, to enter the lung, especially in patients        rates of aspiration pneumonia, death, and other
who also have an ineffective cough reflex (Fig. 1).       adverse outcomes. A meta-analysis of studies
Large-volume aspiration occurs with dysphagia;            involving frail elderly patients showed that dys-
head, neck, and esophageal cancer; esophageal             phagia increased the odds ratio for aspiration
stricture and motility disorders; chronic obstruc-        pneumonia by a factor of 9.4, but when cerebro-
tive pulmonary disease; and seizures.1,3,32-41 In a       vascular disease was also present, the odds ratio
case–control study involving elderly patients with        rose to 12.9.38 In a study involving 1348 patients
pneumonia and healthy elderly controls, oropha-           with community-acquired pneumonia, 13.8% of
ryngeal dysphagia increased the risk of pneumo-           the patients were considered to be at risk for
nia (odds ratio, 11.9) and was present in nearly          aspiration, and this subgroup of patients had a
92% of the patients who had pneumonia. Results            higher 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.73) and
of videofluoroscopic evaluation showed that               increased risks of recurrent pneumonia (hazard
16.7% of the patients with pneumonia were able            ratio, 3.13) and rehospitalization (hazard ratio,
to swallow safely, as compared with 80% of the            1.52) as compared with the rest of the study
controls.32 In extubated survivors of respiratory         population.39 Similarly, a study involving 322
failure, dysphagia and aspiration are identified          patients with community-acquired pneumonia
in at least 20% of patients. The frequency of             identified the important risk factors for aspira-
swallowing dysfunction declines over time, but            tion pneumonia as dementia (odds ratio, 5.20),
up to 35% of patients with swallowing dysfunc-            poor performance status (odds ratio, 3.31), and

                                 n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019                                             653
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l     of   m e dic i n e

                       Pathogenesis and risk factors for the
                         development of pneumonia after
                                macroaspiration

                                        Risk Factors
                    Impaired swallowing
                    Esophageal disease: dysphagia, cancer, stricture
                    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
                                                                                                                 Brain–swallowing axis
                    Neurologic diseases: seizures, multiple sclerosis,
                     parkinsonism, stroke, dementia                                                              Oropharyngeal contents
                    Mechanical ventilation extubation                                                            Gastric contents

                    Impaired consciousness
                    Neurologic disease: stroke
                    Cardiac arrest
                    Medications
                    General anesthesia
                    Alcohol consumption
                    Increased chance of gastric contents reaching the lung
                    Reflux
                    Tube feeding
                    Impaired cough reflex
                    Medications
                    Alcohol
                    Stroke
                    Dementia
                    Degenerative neurologic disease
                    Impaired consciousness

                 Figure 1. Pathogenesis of and Risk Factors for Pneumonia after Macroaspiration.
                 Macroaspiration can occur as a result of abnormalities in the swallowing mechanism or altered swallowing due to
                 dysfunction of the central nervous system. In patients with these disorders, oropharyngeal or gastric contents can
                 enter the lung. An impaired cough reflex increases the likelihood that aspirated material will reach the lung. Shown
                 are the disease processes that serve as risk factors for macroaspiration by impairing consciousness, swallowing,
                 and cough and by increasing the chance that gastric contents will reach the lung.

               use of sleeping pills (odds ratio, 2.08).40 Those                 pneumonia is cardiac arrest. In a study involving
               with two or more risk factors had an increased                    641 patients with cardiac arrest, pneumonia de-
               incidence of recurrent pneumonia and increased                    veloped within 3 days after the event in 65% of
               30-day and 6-month mortality, with rates rising                   the patients.41 The presumed mechanism is aspi-
               in parallel with the number of risk factors. The                  ration of gastric contents during resuscitation
               relationship between distinct risk factors for                    (promoted by stomach ventilation and the resus-
               macroaspiration and the frequency and outcome                     citation procedure) and inhalation of oral secre-
               of aspiration pneumonia underscores the differ-                   tions during bag–valve–mask ventilation and in-
               ence between aspiration pneumonia and tradi-                      tubation. When therapeutic hypothermia to 33°C
               tional community-acquired pneumonia: patients                     was used after cardiac arrest, the odds ratio for
               with traditional community-acquired pneumo-                       early-onset pneumonia rose by a factor of 1.9.41
               nia have no associated increase in the risk of                    However, a target temperature of 36°C may be
               aspiration.                                                       associated with a lower risk of pneumonia.42
                  An important clinical context for aspiration                   Some studies showed that the incidence of early-

654                                                     n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019

                                                The New England Journal of Medicine
      Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                                  Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Aspir ation Pneumonia

 A                                                           B

 C                                                           D

 Figure 2. Characteristic Imaging Findings in Patients with Aspiration Pneumonia.
 The chest radiograph in Panel A shows the findings in a 68-year-old man who presented with a several-week history
 of cough, blood in the sputum, and a 6.8-kg weight loss but who was otherwise in generally good health. He had
 extensive tooth decay and gingival inflammation. He did not drink alcohol or use illicit drugs but did take an anti-
 depressant known to cause somnolence. The radiograph shows a cavitary infiltrate in the left lower lobe and an in-
 filtrate in the left upper lobe. The radiograph in Panel B is from an 84-year-old man with small-bowel obstruction.
 He had repeated episodes of vomiting, with the development of bilateral lung infiltrates, respiratory failure, and the
 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Initial cultures were sterile, but 1 week later, he continued to have lung infil-
 trates and sputum culture showed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The computed tomographic (CT)
 scan in Panel C shows a cavitary infiltrate in the right upper lobe posteriorly in a 56-year-old man with cough after
 tooth extraction performed with local anesthesia. He drank four beers per day. Bronchoscopic cultures revealed
 Klebsiella pneumoniae. The CT scan in Panel D shows new bilateral infiltrates in posterior, gravity-dependent lung
 segments in a 79-year-old man with dyspnea after upper endoscopy complicated by vomiting.

onset pneumonia decreased among patients re-                 Clinical features range from no symptoms to
ceiving systemic antibiotics at the time of car-             severe distress with respiratory failure, and the
diac arrest.43 Two intervention studies involving            clinical consequences may develop acutely, sub-
comatose patients showed a benefit of adminis-               acutely, or slowly and progressively. Aspiration
tering prophylactic antibiotics for up to 24 hours           into the lung can affect either the airway (caus-
after emergency intubation.44,45                             ing bronchospasm, asthma, and chronic cough)
                                                             or the lung parenchyma. This discussion focuses
                                                             on aspiration into the lung parenchyma, which
            Cl inic a l Fe at ur e s
                                                             can take the form of aspiration resulting in
Although macroaspiration is an essential feature             chemical pneumonitis, aspiration of bland mate-
of aspiration pneumonia and chemical pneumo-                 rial (blood or the contents of tube feeding), or
nitis, many episodes are unwitnessed; therefore,             aspiration resulting in bacterial pneumonia.
the magnitude of the exposure is often unknown.                 Aspiration pneumonia is usually acute, with

                                   n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019                                           655
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l     of   m e dic i n e

               symptoms developing within hours to a few days               and a pattern that is characteristic of acute respi-
               after a sentinel event, although anaerobic aspira-           ratory distress syndrome develops in up to 16.5%
               tion may be subacute because of the less virulent            of patients with witnessed aspiration, although
               bacteria, and clinical features are difficult to             the frequency rises if other risk factors (shock,
               distinguish from those of other bacterial pneu-              trauma, or pancreatitis) are also present 51
               monias. In a study involving patients with pneu-             (Fig. 2B). Low-pH aspirates are usually sterile, and
               monia who were more than 80 years of age,                    bacterial infection is unusual initially, although
               those with aspiration had a higher mortality,                superinfection may develop subsequently.
               higher serum sodium levels, and worse renal                     In most cases, neither chemical pneumonitis
               function than patients without aspiration.46 In a            nor aspiration pneumonia occurs with tube feed-
               group of 53 patients with pneumonia and fluoro-              ings or aspirated blood, since the aspirate pH is
               scopically documented dysphagia, more patients               usually high and uncontaminated by bacteria.
               had bronchopneumonia than lobar pneumonia                    Although acid-suppressing therapy is associated
               (68% vs. 15%), and 92% had posterior infiltrates.47          with an increased risk of community- or hospital-
               Most patients with poor performance status had               acquired pneumonia, which is related to gastric
               diffuse and not focal infiltrates. Aspiration pneu-          overgrowth by gram-negative bacteria, neutral-
               monia is associated with higher mortality than               ization of gastric pH may reduce the risk of
               other forms of pneumonia acquired in the com-                chemical pneumonitis.52 In a prospective cohort
               munity (29.4% vs. 11.6%), a finding that may                 study involving 255 patients undergoing gastro-
               have implications for hospitals that do not prop-            intestinal endoscopy, the use of proton-pump
               erly code its presence.48 In a survey of more than           inhibitors or histamine H2 blockers was associ-
               1 million patients in more than 4200 hospitals,              ated with a significant reduction in the risk of
               aspiration was documented in 4 to 26% of epi-                gastric contents with a pH of
Aspir ation Pneumonia

position during the event, or basal segments of           with metronidazole failed in 5 of 11 cases of
the lower lobe, if the patient is upright during the      lung abscess and in a randomized trial was less
event) (Fig. 2C and 2D). However, a chest radio-          effective than clindamycin for anaerobic pulmo-
graph may be negative early in the course of              nary infection.63,64
aspiration pneumonia. In a study involving 208                A prospective, randomized trial showed no
patients with pneumonia (more than 60% of                 significant differences among ampicillin–sulbac-
whom had aspiration), the chest radiograph was            tam, clindamycin, and a carbapenem (panipenem–
negative in 28% of patients in whom pneumonia             betamipron [not available in the United States])
was confirmed on computed tomography.55 One               for the treatment of suspected aspiration pneu-
of the entities that can be confused with aspira-         monia in elderly Japanese patients.65 A random-
tion pneumonia is negative-pressure pulmonary             ized trial involving 96 patients compared moxi-
edema. It is important to consider this diagno-           floxacin with ampicillin–sulbactam; both regimens
sis, which is accompanied by bilateral and gen-           had clinical response rates of 66.7%.66 Anaerobes
erally symmetric lung infiltrates and is the result       were isolated in 29.6% of patients with only lung
of breathing against a closed airway after general        abscess. In those with only aspiration pneumo-
anesthesia, choking, or near drowning, all condi-         nia, anaerobes were not found, and the most
tions that may also be accompanied by aspiration.         frequent aerobes were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
    Although the diagnosis is usually clinical,           pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa (Fig. 2C).
some studies have used quantitative lung-lavage               Antibiotic selection depends on the site of
cultures to distinguish bacterial from noninfec-          acquisition (the community, a hospital, or a long-
tious (chemical and bland-aspiration) pneumo-             term care facility) and risk factors for infection
nitis.56 Several investigations have studied bio-         with multidrug-resistant pathogens. Risk factors
marker and biochemical measurements to predict            include treatment with broad-spectrum antibiot-
bacterial infection after aspiration. A study involv-     ics in the past 90 days and hospitalization for at
ing 65 intubated patients with risk factors for           least 5 days. For most patients with community-
aspiration and a new lung infiltrate correlated           acquired cases, treatment with ampicillin–sul-
quantitative bronchoalveolar-lavage cultures with         bactam, a carbapenem (ertapenem), or a fluo-
serum procalcitonin levels.56 Measurement of              roquinolone (levofloxacin or moxifloxacin) is
procalcitonin levels on days 1 and 3 did not dis-         effective.3 In such patients, we suggest adding
tinguish the 32 patients with culture-positive            clindamycin to another drug only when the risk
aspiration pneumonia from the 33 with culture-            of predominantly anaerobic infection is high, as
negative pneumonitis. In studies of ventilated            it is for patients with severe periodontal disease
patients, alpha-amylase levels (from salivary and         and necrotizing pneumonia or lung abscess1
pancreatic sources) were elevated in airway secre-        (Fig. 3 and Table 1). With mixed infection, elimi-
tions, at a frequency reflecting the number of risk       nation of aerobic pathogens usually alters the
factors for aspiration, but the relevance of these        local redox potential, eliminating anaerobes. For
findings to aspiration pneumonia and chemical             hospital-acquired cases with a low risk of multi-
pneumonitis is not certain, and this is not a             drug-resistant pathogens, a similar regimen may
method of value for diagnosis.57,58                       be used. If resistance is a concern, broader-
                                                          spectrum treatment with piperacillin–tazobactam,
                                                          cefepime, levofloxacin, imipenem, or meropenem,
                  T r e atmen t
                                                          either singly or in combination, is required67
Aspiration Pneumonia                                      (Fig. 3 and Table 1). In cases of multidrug-resis-
As documented pathogens have shifted from                 tant infection, an aminoglycoside or colistin may
anaerobes to aerobes, treatment regimens have             be used as part of a combination regimen, with
also evolved. Even when anaerobes predominated            the addition of vancomycin or linezolid if the
and penicillin was the drug of choice, penicillin-        patient has documented nasal or respiratory
ase-producing anaerobes were reported.59,60 Com-          colonization with methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
parative studies of anaerobic lung abscess and                In a recent study involving comatose, mechan-
necrotizing pneumonia showed the superiority              ically ventilated patients with aspiration, 43 of
of clindamycin, with penicillin failure attributed        the 92 patients (46.7%) had bacterial aspiration
to resistant bacteroides species.61,62 Treatment          pneumonia on the basis of bronchoscopic brush

                                 n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019                                             657
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
658
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Aspiration events including aspiration
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   pneumonia and chemical pneumonitis

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Hospital-acquired or long-term
                                                                                                                                                                                        Community-acquired
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      care–acquired

                                                                                                                                                                    Abnormal chest                                                                                          Abnormal chest
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              The

                                                                                                                                                                                                               Clear chest radiograph                                                                                   Clear chest radiograph
                                                                                                                                                                      radiograph                                                                                              radiograph

                                                                                                                                                     If poor dental health,   If normal dental       If mild-to-moderate        If severe illness            If no risk of MDR,       If there is a risk      If mild-to-moderate       If severe illness

                                                                                                                              n engl j med 380;7
                                                                                                                                                     treat with ampicillin–   health, treat with    illness, withhold anti-   (patients who are            treat with ampicillin–    of MDR, treat with         illness, withhold      (patients who are
                                                                                                                                                           sulbactam,             ampicillin–        biotics and observe intubated or in septic                   sulbactam,             piperacillin–           antibiotics and    intubated or in septic
                                                                                                                                                           amoxicillin–           sulbactam,                                      shock), treat                  amoxicillin–            tazobactam,                 observe               shock), treat
                                                                                                                                                           clavulanate,          amoxicillin–                                 according to risks                 clavulanate,              cefepime,                                  according to risks
                                                                                                                                                        fluoroquinolone          clavulanate,                                based on dentition               fluoroquinolone            levofloxacin,                                based on dentition

                                                                                                                              nejm.org
                                                                                                                                                         (moxifloxacin),      fluoroquinolone                                    and MDR and                    (levofloxacin,           carbapenem                                      and MDR and
                                                                                                                                                          carbapenem            (levofloxacin,                              reassess in 48–72 hr;               moxifloxacin),          (meropenem,                                 reassess in 48–72 hr;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l

                                                                                                                                                          (ertapenem)           moxifloxacin),                                   consider bron-                  carbapenem               imipenem)                                      consider bron-

                                          The New England Journal of Medicine
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      choscopy and BAL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              of

                                                                                                                                                                                 carbapenem                                   choscopy and BAL                  (ertapenem),              plus either
                                                                                                                                                                                (ertapenem),                                   to guide decision                 ceftriaxone          aminoglycoside                                   to guide decision
                                                                                                                                                                                  ceftriaxone                                                                                              or colistin

                                                                                                                              February 14, 2019
                                                                                                                                                   Figure 3. An Algorithmic Approach to Antibiotic Therapy for Aspiration Pneumonia.

                            Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             m e dic i n e

                                                                                                                                                   For patients with suspected aspiration pneumonia, the decision about antibiotic therapy is dictated by the site of acquisition: community, hospital, or long-term care facility. Antibi-
                                                                                                                                                   otics are given to patients who have an aspiration event and an abnormal chest radiograph, although even with an initially normal radiograph, antibiotics are given to those with se-
                                                                                                                                                   vere illness (i.e., illness characterized by shock or requiring intubation). If chemical pneumonitis is suspected, antibiotics are not initially recommended, even with an abnormal ra-
                                                                                                                                                   diograph, unless the patient is severely ill; in patients with mild-to-moderate illness and an abnormal radiograph, the recommendation is to withhold antibiotics and reassess the
                                                                                                                                                   patient in 48 hours. Therapy is directed at the pathogens likely to be present in the patient at the time of aspiration, determined on the basis of the site of acquisition, with risk fac-
                                                                                                                                                   tors for resistant pathogens taken into consideration. Patients with severe illness are treated on the basis of risks associated with their dental health and multidrug resistance
                                                                                                                                                   (MDR). Routine treatment for anaerobic pathogens is not needed in patients with normal dental health but should be considered in those with poor dental health (e.g., clindamycin
                                                                                                                                                   in patients with poor dental health and necrotizing pneumonia or lung abscess). If the site of acquisition is the community, outpatient treatment with amoxicillin–clavulanate, moxi-
                                                                                                                                                   floxacin, levofloxacin, or clindamycin can be administered orally. In the hospital, treatment is usually administered intravenously, but oral options are available for select patients; if
                                                                                                                                                   there is nasal or respiratory colonization with methicillin-resistant S. aureus, the addition of vancomycin or linezolid can be considered. BAL denotes bronchoalveolar lavage.

Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Aspir ation Pneumonia

samples.68 The investigators suggested that rou-            Table 1. Antibiotic Treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia.*
tine antibiotic treatment should be started only if
bacterial infection is suspected but may be dis-            Drug                            Dose, Schedule, and Route of Administration
continued if bronchoscopic cultures are negative.           Ampicillin–sulbactam          1.5–3 g every 6 hr, intravenous
   On the basis of data from studies of commu-              Amoxicillin–clavulanate       875 mg twice daily, oral
nity-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired
                                                            Piperacillin–tazobactam       4.5 g every 8 hr or 3.375 g every 6 hr, intravenous
or ventilator-associated pneumonia, we suggest
                                                            Ceftriaxone                   1–2 g once daily, intravenous
5 to 7 days of treatment for patients with a good
clinical response and no evidence of extrapulmo-            Cefepime                      2 g every 8–12 hr, intravenous
nary infection, and longer treatment for those              Ertapenem                     1 g once daily, intravenous
with necrotizing pneumonia, lung abscess, or em-            Imipenem                      500 mg every 6 hr or 1 g every 8 hr, intravenous
pyema. In the case of lung abscess or empyema,              Meropenem                     1 g every 8 hr, intravenous
drainage for diagnostic and treatment purposes              Levofloxacin                  750 mg once daily, intravenous or oral
may be needed. The choice of therapy should
                                                            Moxifloxacin                  400 mg once daily, intravenous or oral
take into account potential drug-related adverse
events, including Clostridium difficile colitis and         Clindamycin                   450 mg three or four times daily, oral; or 600 mg
                                                                                             every 8 hr, intravenous
selection of antibiotic resistance. More data are
                                                            Gentamicin or tobra­          5–7 mg/kg once daily, intravenous
needed to identify the best antibiotic regimens                mycin†
for aspiration pneumonia and to determine the
                                                            Amikacin†                     15 mg/kg once daily, intravenous
duration of treatment. No randomized, controlled
                                                            Colistin‡                     9 million IU per day in two or three divided
trials have shown a role for glucocorticoids in                                              doses, intravenous
the routine treatment of aspiration pneumonia,
                                                            Vancomycin†                   15 mg/kg every 12 hr, intravenous
and we do not recommend their use.
                                                            Linezolid                     600 mg every 12 hr, intravenous or oral
Chemical Pneumonitis
                                                          *	Doses are for patients with normal renal function.
Initial treatment of gastric aspiration requires air-     †	The dose should be adjusted to a trough level of less than 1 mg per liter for
way maintenance, management of airway edema                 gentamicin and tobramycin, a trough level of less than 4 mg per liter for ami-
                                                            kacin, and a trough level of 10 to 15 μg per milliliter for vancomycin, with renal
or bronchospasm, and minimization of tissue                 function taken into consideration in all cases.
damage. Depending on the severity of the pneu-            ‡	A loading dose of 6 million to 9 million IU can be administered.
monitis and the extent of care required, treatment
may include suctioning, bronchoscopy, intuba-
tion, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care.         formed (Table 2). Medications known to pro-
Routine adjunctive treatment with glucocorticoids         mote aspiration and interfere with swallowing
is not recommended, and antibiotics are not               should be avoided, including sedatives, antipsy-
needed routinely unless the patient is taking acid-       chotic agents, and for some at-risk patients, anti-
suppressing medication or has small-bowel ob-             histamines.35 Aspiration-prevention efforts focus-
struction. In mild-to-moderate cases, we recom-           ing on ventilator-associated pneumonia are not
mend withholding antibiotics even if there is             discussed here.
radiographic evidence of an infiltrate, monitoring            For patients with swallowing disorders, par-
clinical and radiographic findings, and reassess-         ticularly after stroke, a full speech and swallow-
ing after 48 hours. In more serious cases, how-           ing evaluation is necessary. Efforts should be
ever, antibiotics should be started empirically, and      made to promote oral rather than enteral tube
the decision to continue antibiotic therapy for           feeding, with the use of a mechanical soft diet
more than 2 to 3 days should be guided by the             with thickened liquids rather than pureed food
clinical course.                                          and thin liquids. In addition, “nutritional reha-
                                                          bilitation” with swallowing exercises and early
                                                          mobilization may help patients with dysphagia
                 Pr e v en t ion
                                                          and may prevent recurrence of aspiration pneu-
Postoperative chemical pneumonitis can be min-            monia.69 Patients should receive enteral feeding
imized by ensuring that the patient has fasted            in a semirecumbent rather than supine position
for at least 8 hours and has abstained from clear         to minimize the risk of gastric aspiration. For
liquids for at least 2 hours before surgery is per-       patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, an effort

                                 n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019                                                        659
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l     of   m e dic i n e

 Table 2. Prevention of Aspiration Pneumonia.
                                                                                        A meta-analysis of five randomized, controlled
                                                                                        trials involving nonventilated patients at risk for
 Recommended in the appropriate clinical setting                                        aspiration pneumonia showed that oral care with
 Antibiotic therapy for 24 hr in comatose patients after emergency intubation           chlorhexidine or mechanical oral cleaning was
 No food for at least 8 hr and no clear liquids for at least 2 hr before elective       effective in preventing pneumonia (odds ratio,
    surgery with general anesthesia                                                     0.4 to 0.6).76 However, chlorhexidine use is con-
 To be considered in the appropriate clinical setting                                   troversial and may be associated with increased
 Swallowing evaluation after stroke and after extubation from mechanical                mortality among ventilated patients, possibly as
    ventilation                                                                         a result of toxic effects if chlorhexidine is aspi-
 Preference for angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors for blood-pressure             rated into the lung.77 In a randomized study in-
    control after stroke                                                                volving 252 patients, supplemental nutrition plus
 Oral care with brushing and removal of poorly maintained teeth                         daily oral cleaning reduced the frequency of
 Feeding in a semirecumbent position for patients with stroke                           pneumonia (7.8%, vs. 17.7% with usual care;
 Not yet recommended; more data needed
                                                                                        P = 0.06).78 In a case–control study involving 539
                                                                                        patients undergoing surgery for esophageal can-
 Swallowing exercises for patients with dysphagia after stroke
                                                                                        cer, postoperative pneumonia developed in 19.1%
 Oral chlorhexidine in patients at risk for aspiration
                                                                                        of the patients. Lack of preoperative oral care,
                                                                                        including tooth scaling, mechanical cleaning,
                     should be made to keep the patient’s chin down                     and tooth extraction if necessary, was an impor-
                     and head turned to one side during feeding and                     tant risk factor.79 Despite these promising find-
                     to encourage swallowing of small volumes, mul-                     ings, a cluster-randomized study involving 834
                     tiple swallows, and coughing after each swallow.33                 nursing home patients, with a mean observation
                     In a study involving comatose patients, the risk                   time of slightly more than 1 year, showed no
                     of aspiration pneumonia was reduced by keep-                       benefit of a comprehensive oral care program,
                     ing patients in either the prone or semirecum-                     which included manual tooth and gum brushing,
                     bent position.70                                                   chlorhexidine mouth washes, and upright posi-
                         The role of nasogastric tubes in preventing                    tioning during feeding, with radiographic evi-
                     aspiration pneumonia is uncertain. In a study                      dence of the development of pneumonia in 25%
                     involving 1260 patients, the 630 patients with a                   of the patients.80
                     nasogastric tube in place did not have more as-                       Antibiotic administration for up to 24 hours
                     piration events during endoscopic observation of                   in comatose patients who have been intubated
                     swallowing than the 630 patients without a naso-                   on an emergency basis has shown a benefit in
                     gastric tube.71 Postpyloric feeding is not superior                two trials. An open, randomized, controlled study
                     to gastric feeding, and monitoring of postfeed-                    involving 100 intubated, comatose patients with
                     ing residual volume may not minimize the risk                      stroke or head injury showed that 1.5 g of cefu-
                     of aspiration.3,72 For patients with stroke, particu-              roxime given every 12 hours for two doses re-
                     larly Asian patients, the use of angiotensin-con-                  duced the occurrence of pneumonia, particularly
                     verting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to control blood                   early-onset pneumonia.44 Control patients receiv-
                     pressure can reduce the risk of aspiration pneu-                   ing antibiotics at the time of intubation had lower
                     monia, possibly by elevating substance P levels,                   pneumonia rates than those not receiving anti-
                     which promotes cough and improves the swal-                        biotics. A subsequent cohort study showed that a
                     lowing reflex.73,74 In a meta-analysis of data from                single dose of antibiotic (ceftriaxone or ertapenem)
                     8693 patients with stroke, patients who received                   administered within 4 hours after intubation was
                     ACE inhibitors had a reduced risk of aspiration,                   effective in preventing early-onset but not late-
                     as compared with patients who did not receive                      onset pneumonia in comatose patients,45 includ-
                     ACE inhibitors (odds ratio, 0.6).74 Cilostazol, an                 ing the 25% of patients who were intubated on
                     antiplatelet agent that may have a similar effect                  an emergency basis after cardiac arrest.
                     on substance P, has also been shown to prevent
                     pneumonia after stroke.34                                           C onclusions
                         In the prevention of aspiration pneumonia, a
                     focus on oral hygiene has yielded an inconsistent Aspiration pneumonia is an important illness
                     benefit, possibly because of study design issues.75 that is difficult to accurately diagnose and to

660                                                            n engl j med 380;7   nejm.org   February 14, 2019

                                                    The New England Journal of Medicine
          Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                                      Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Aspir ation Pneumonia

distinguish from other aspiration syndromes                              Dr. Mandell reports receiving fees for serving on a data moni-
                                                                      toring committee from Bayer and Polyphor, fees for serving on a
and community- and hospital-acquired pneumo-
                                                                      data and safety monitoring board from Cubist Pharmaceuticals
nias. The diagnosis should be considered in the                       and Shionogi, and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo; and Dr. Nieder-
appropriate clinical settings in patients with                        man, receiving consulting fees from Thermo Fisher, Paratek,
known risk factors for aspiration and character-                      Nabriva, Melinta, and Shionogi, advisory fees from Pfizer, and
                                                                      grant support and consulting fees from Merck and Bayer. No other
istic clinical and radiographic findings. Aspira-                     potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
tion pneumonia is treated with antibiotics as                            Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with
required but not with glucocorticoids. Preventive                     the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
                                                                         We thank Dr. Robert P. Dickson, Division of Pulmonary and
measures should be used for patients at risk for                      Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, for his assistance
aspiration.                                                           and thoughtful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References
1. Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and        Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2015;​309:​L1047-         study of community- and hospital-acquired
aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2001;​      L1055.                                          cases. Ann Intern Med 1974;​81:​329-31.
344:​665-71.                                   14. Marks LR, Davidson BA, Knight PR,           26. Bartlett JG. How important are an-
2. Gleeson K, Eggli DF, Maxwell SL.            Hakansson AP. Interkingdom signaling in-        aerobic bacteria in aspiration pneumonia:
Quantitative aspiration during sleep in        duces Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm          when should they be treated and what is
normal subjects. Chest 1997;​111:​1266-72.     dispersion and transition from asymptom-        optimal therapy. Infect Dis Clin North
3. DiBardino DM, Wunderink RG. Aspi-           atic colonization to disease. MBio 2013;​       Am 2013;​27:​149-55.
ration pneumonia: a review of modern           4(4):​e00438-13.                                27. Mier L, Dreyfuss D, Darchy B, et al. Is
trends. J Crit Care 2015;​30:​40-8.            15. Belay T, Sonnenfeld G. Differential         penicillin G an adequate initial treatment
4. Boaden E, Lyons M, Singhrao SK, et al.      effects of catecholamines on in vitro           for aspiration pneumonia? A prospective
Oral flora in acute stroke patients: a pro-    growth of pathogenic bacteria. Life Sci         evaluation using a protected specimen
spective exploratory observational study.      2002;​71:​447-56.                               brush and quantitative cultures. Intensive
Gerodontology 2017;​34:​343-56.                16. Freestone PP, Hirst RA, Sandrini SM,        Care Med 1993;​19:​279-84.
5. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Huff-          et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-catechola­        28. Marik PE, Careau P. The role of anaer-
nagle GB. The role of the bacterial micro-     mine inotrope interactions: a contributory      obes in patients with ventilator-associated
biome in lung disease. Expert Rev Respir       factor in the development of ventilator-        pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia:
Med 2013;​7:​245-57.                           associated pneumonia? Chest 2012;​142:​         a prospective study. Chest 1999;​115:​178-83.
6. Segal LN, Rom WN, Weiden MD.                1200-10.                                        29. El-Solh AA, Pietrantoni C, Bhat A, et al.
Lung microbiome for clinicians: new dis-       17. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, et al.        Microbiology of severe aspiration pneu-
coveries about bugs in healthy and dis-        The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol          monia in institutionalized elderly. Am J
eased lungs. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014;​11:​      2010;​192:​5002-17.                             Respir Crit Care Med 2003;​167:​1650-4.
108-16.                                        18. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I,      30. Tokuyasu H, Harada T, Watanabe E,
7. Segal LN, Clemente JC, Tsay JC, et al.      Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacte-         et al. Effectiveness of meropenem for the
Enrichment of the lung microbiome with         rial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Micro-    treatment of aspiration pneumonia in el-
oral taxa is associated with lung inflam-      biol 2005;​43:​5721-32.                         derly patients. Intern Med 2009;​48:​129-
mation of a Th17 phenotype. Nat Micro-         19. Kageyama S, Takeshita T, Furuta M,          35.
biol 2016;​1:​16031.                           et al. Relationships of variations in the       31. Wu YC, Hsu PK, Su KC, et al. Bile acid
8. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR,                tongue microbiota and pneumonia mor-            aspiration in suspected ventilator-associ-
Falkowski NR, Hunter EM, Ashley SL,            tality in nursing home residents. J Geron-      ated pneumonia. Chest 2009;​136:​118-24.
Huffnagle GB. The lung microbiota of           tol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2018;​73:​1097-102.      32. Almirall J, Rofes L, Serra-Prat M, et al.
healthy mice are highly variable, cluster by   20. El-Solh AA, Pietrantoni C, Bhat A, et al.   Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a risk factor
environment, and reflect variation in base-    Colonization of dental plaques: a reser-        for community-acquired pneumonia in the
line lung innate immunity. Am J Respir         voir of respiratory pathogens for hospital-     elderly. Eur Respir J 2013;​41:​923-8.
Crit Care Med 2018;​198:​497-508.              acquired pneumonia in institutionalized         33. Macht M, White SD, Moss M. Swal-
9. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. The damage-      elders. Chest 2004;​126:​1575-82.               lowing dysfunction after critical illness.
response framework of microbial patho-         21. Leibovitz A, Plotnikov G, Habot B, et al.   Chest 2014;​146:​1681-9.
genesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2003;​1:​17-24.     Saliva secretion and oral flora in pro-         34. Hannawi Y, Hannawi B, Rao CP, Suarez
10. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. Host-           longed nasogastric tube-fed elderly pa-         JI, Bershad EM. Stroke-associated pneu-
pathogen interactions: redefining the ba-      tients. Isr Med Assoc J 2003;​5:​329-32.        monia: major advances and obstacles.
sic concepts of virulence and pathogenic-      22. Johanson WG, Pierce AK, Sanford JP.         Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;​35:​430-43.
ity. Infect Immun 1999;​67:​3703-13.           Changing pharyngeal bacterial flora of          35. Herzig SJ, LaSalvia MT, Naidus E, et al.
11. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Mar-          hospitalized patients — emergence of            Antipsychotics and the risk of aspiration
tinez FJ, Huffnagle GB. The microbiome         gram-negative bacilli. N Engl J Med 1969;​      pneumonia in individuals hospitalized for
and the respiratory tract. Annu Rev Physiol    281:​1137-40.                                   nonpsychiatric conditions: a cohort study.
2016;​78:​481-504.                             23. Bartlett JG, Gorbach SL, Finegold SM.       J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;​65:​2580-6.
12. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Huff-         The bacteriology of aspiration pneumo-          36. Dennis M, Lewis S, Cranswick G,
nagle GB. Towards an ecology of the lung:      nia. Am J Med 1974;​56:​202-7.                  Forbes J. FOOD: a multicentre random­
new conceptual models of pulmonary mi-         24. Cesar L, Gonzalez C, Calia FM. Bacte-       ised trial evaluating feeding policies in
crobiology and pneumonia pathogenesis.         riologic flora of aspiration-induced pul-       patients admitted to hospital with a re-
Lancet Respir Med 2014;​2:​238-46.             monary infections. Arch Intern Med 1975;​       cent stroke. Health Technol Assess 2006;​
13. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Huff-         135:​711-4.                                     10:​iii-iv, ix-x, 1-120.
nagle GB. Homeostasis and its disrup-          25. Lorber B, Swenson RM. Bacteriology          37. American Geriatrics Society Ethics
tion in the lung microbiome. Am J Physiol      of aspiration pneumonia: a prospective          Committee and Clinical Practice and Mod-

                                        n engl j med 380;7      nejm.org     February 14, 2019                                                 661
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The   n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l           of   m e dic i n e

               els of Care Committee. American Geriat-         Early identification of patients at risk of     65. Kadowaki M, Demura Y, Mizuno S,
               rics Society feeding tubes in advanced          acute lung injury: evaluation of lung injury    et al. Reappraisal of clindamycin IV mono-
               dementia position statement. J Am Geri-         prediction score in a multicenter cohort        therapy for treatment of mild-to-moder-
               atr Soc 2014;​62:​1590-3.                       study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;​         ate aspiration pneumonia in elderly pa-
               38. van der Maarel-Wierink CD, Vanob-           183:​462-70.                                    tients. Chest 2005;​127:​1276-82.
               bergen JN, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JM, de         52. Lambert AA, Lam JO, Paik JJ, Ugarte-        66. Ott SR, Allewelt M, Lorenz J, Reim-
               Baat C. Meta-analysis of dysphagia and as-      Gil C, Drummond MB, Crowell TA. Risk            nitz P, Lode H. Moxifloxacin vs ampicillin/
               piration pneumonia in frail elders. J Dent      of community-acquired pneumonia with            sulbactam in aspiration pneumonia and
               Res 2011;​90:​1398-404.                         outpatient proton-pump inhibitor therapy:       primary lung abscess. Infection 2008;​36:​
               39. Taylor JK, Fleming GB, Singanayagam         a systematic review and meta-analysis.          23-30.
               A, Hill AT, Chalmers JD. Risk factors for       PLoS One 2015;​10(6):​e0128004.                 67. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M,
               aspiration in community-acquired pneu-          53. Phillips S, Liang SS, Formaz-Preston        et al. Management of adults with hospital-
               monia: analysis of a hospitalized UK co-        A, Stewart PA. High-risk residual gastric       acquired and ventilator-associated pneu-
               hort. Am J Med 2013;​126:​995-1001.             content in fasted patients undergoing           monia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines
               40. Noguchi S, Yatera K, Kato T, et al. Im-     gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective       by the Infectious Diseases Society of Amer-
               pact of the number of aspiration risk fac-      cohort study of prevalence and predictors.      ica and the American Thoracic Society.
               tors on mortality and recurrence in com-        Anaesth Intensive Care 2015;​43:​728-33.        Clin Infect Dis 2016;​63(5):​e61-e111.
               munity-onset pneumonia. Clin Interv Aging       54. Lin L, Lv L, Wang Y, Zha X, Tang F, Liu     68. Lascarrou JB, Lissonde F, Le Thuaut
               2017;​12:​2087-94.                              X. The clinical features of foreign body        A, et al. Antibiotic therapy in comatose
               41. Perbet S, Mongardon N, Dumas F,             aspiration into the lower airway in geriat-     mechanically ventilated patients follow-
               et al. Early-onset pneumonia after cardiac      ric patients. Clin Interv Aging 2014;​    9:​   ing aspiration: differentiating pneumonia
               arrest: characteristics, risk factors and in-   1613-8.                                         from pneumonitis. Crit Care Med 2017;​45:​
               fluence on prognosis. Am J Respir Crit          55. Miyashita N, Kawai Y, Tanaka T, et al.      1268-75.
               Care Med 2011;​184:​1048-54.                    Detection failure rate of chest radiogra-       69. Momosaki R. Rehabilitative manage-
               42. Johnson NJ, Carlbom DJ, Gaieski DF.         phy for the identification of nursing and       ment for aspiration pneumonia in elderly
               Ventilator management and respiratory           healthcare-associated pneumonia. J Infect       patients. J Gen Fam Med 2017;​18:​12-5.
               care after cardiac arrest: oxygenation,         Chemother 2015;​21:​492-6.                      70. Adnet F, Borron SW, Finot MA, Mi-
               ventilation, infection, and injury. Chest       56. El-Solh AA, Vora H, Knight PR III,          nadeo J, Baud FJ. Relation of body position
               2018;​153:​1466-77.                             Porhomayon J. Diagnostic use of serum           at the time of discovery with suspected
               43. Rello J, Diaz E, Roque M, Vallés J.         procalcitonin levels in pulmonary aspira-       aspiration pneumonia in poisoned co-
               Risk factors for developing pneumonia           tion syndromes. Crit Care Med 2011;​39:​        matose patients. Crit Care Med 1999;​27:​
               within 48 hours of intubation. Am J             1251-6.                                         745-8.
               Respir Crit Care Med 1999;​159:​1742-6.         57. Weiss CH, Moazed F, DiBardino D,            71. Leder SB, Suiter DM. Effect of naso-
               44. Sirvent JM, Torres A, El-Ebiary M,          Swaroop M, Wunderink RG. Broncho­               gastric tubes on incidence of aspiration.
               Castro P, de Batlle J, Bonet A. Protective      alveolar lavage amylase is associated with      Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;​89:​648-51.
               effect of intravenously administered ce-        risk factors for aspiration and predicts        72. Elke G, Felbinger TW, Heyland DK.
               furoxime against nosocomial pneumo-             bacterial pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2013;​       Gastric residual volume in critically ill pa-
               nia in patients with structural coma. Am        41:​765-73.                                     tients: a dead marker or still alive? Nutr
               J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;​155:​1729-34.      58. Samanta S, Poddar B, Azim A, Singh          Clin Pract 2015;​30:​59-71.
               45. Vallés J, Peredo R, Burgueño MJ, et al.     RK, Gurjar M, Baronia AK. Significance          73. Ohkubo T, Chapman N, Neal B,
               Efficacy of single-dose antibiotic against      of mini bronchoalveolar lavage fluid amy-       Woodward M, Omae T, Chalmers J. Effects
               early-onset pneumonia in comatose pa-           lase level in ventilator-associated pneu-       of an angiotensin-converting enzyme
               tients who are ventilated. Chest 2013;​143:​    monia: a prospective observational study.       inhibitor-based regimen on pneumonia
               1219-25.                                        Crit Care Med 2018;​46:​71-8.                   risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;​169:​
               46. Pinargote H, Ramos JM, Zurita A,            59. Bartlett JG. Treatment of anaerobic         1041-5.
               Portilla J. Clinical features and outcomes      pleuropulmonary infections. Ann Intern          74. Shinohara Y, Origasa H. Post-stroke
               of aspiration pneumonia and non-aspira-         Med 1975;​83:​376.                              pneumonia prevention by angiotensin-
               tion pneumonia in octogenarians and             60. Finegold SM. Aspiration pneumonia.          converting enzyme inhibitors: results of a
               nonagenarians admitted in a General In-         Rev Infect Dis 1991;​13:​Suppl 9:​S737-S742.    meta-analysis of five studies in Asians.
               ternal Medicine unit. Rev Esp Quimioter         61. Levison ME, Mangura CT, Lorber B,           Adv Ther 2012;​29:​900-12.
               2015;​28:​310-3.                                et al. Clindamycin compared with peni-          75. Mylotte JM. Will maintenance of oral
               47. Komiya K, Ishii H, Umeki K, et al.          cillin for the treatment of anaerobic lung      hygiene in nursing home residents pre-
               Computed tomography findings of aspi-           abscess. Ann Intern Med 1983;​      98:​466-    vent pneumonia? J Am Geriatr Soc 2018;​
               ration pneumonia in 53 patients. Geriatr        71.                                             66:​590-4.
               Gerontol Int 2013;​13:​580-5.                   62. Gudiol F, Manresa F, Pallares R, et al.     76. Kaneoka A, Pisegna JM, Miloro KV,
               48. Lindenauer PK, Strait KM, Grady JN,         Clindamycin vs penicillin for anaerobic         et al. Prevention of healthcare-associated
               et al. Variation in the diagnosis of aspira-    lung infections: high rate of penicillin        pneumonia with oral care in individuals
               tion pneumonia and association with hos-        failures associated with penicillin-resis-      without mechanical ventilation: a system-
               pital pneumonia outcomes. Ann Am Thorac         tant Bacteroides melaninogenicus. Arch          atic review and meta-analysis of random-
               Soc 2018;​15:​562-9.                            Intern Med 1990;​150:​2525-9.                   ized controlled trials. Infect Control Hosp
               49. Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG.             63. Sanders CV, Hanna BJ, Lewis AC. Met-        Epidemiol 2015;​36:​899-906.
               Clinical significance of pulmonary aspi-        ronidazole in the treatment of anaerobic        77. Klompas M, Speck K, Howell MD,
               ration during the perioperative period.         infections. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;​120:​       Greene LR, Berenholtz SM. Reappraisal of
               Anesthesiology 1993;​78:​56-62.                 337-43.                                         routine oral care with chlorhexidine glu-
               50. Raghavendran K, Nemzek J, Napoli-           64. Perlino CA. Metronidazole vs clinda­        conate for patients receiving mechanical
               tano LM, Knight PR. Aspiration-induced          mycin treatment of anerobic pulmonary           ventilation: systematic review and meta-
               lung injury. Crit Care Med 2011;​39:​818-26.    infection: failure of metronidazole ther-       analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2014;​174:​751-
               51. Gajic O, Dabbagh O, Park PK, et al.         apy. Arch Intern Med 1981;​141:​1424-7.         61.

662                                                     n engl j med 380;7      nejm.org     February 14, 2019

                                                The New England Journal of Medicine
      Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                                  Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Aspir ation Pneumonia

78. Higashiguchi T, Ohara H, Kamakura        79. Soutome S, Yanamoto S, Funahara M,        80. Juthani-Mehta M, Van Ness PH, Mc-
Y, et al. Efficacy of a new post-mouthwash   et al. Effect of perioperative oral care on   Gloin J, et al. A cluster-randomized con-
intervention (wiping plus oral nutritional   prevention of postoperative pneumonia         trolled trial of a multicomponent inter-
supplements) for preventing aspiration       associated with esophageal cancer sur-        vention protocol for pneumonia prevention
pneumonia in elderly people: a multi-        gery: a multicenter case-control study        among nursing home elders. Clin Infect
center, randomized, comparative trial.       with propensity score matching analysis.      Dis 2015;​60:​849-57.
Ann Nutr Metab 2017;​71:​253-60.             Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;​96(33):​e7436.     Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

                                                    images in clinical medicine
                           The Journal welcomes consideration of new submissions for Images in Clinical
                          Medicine. Instructions for authors and procedures for submissions can be found
                          on the Journal’s website at NEJM.org. At the discretion of the editor, images that
                             are accepted for publication may appear in the print version of the Journal,
                                                    the electronic version, or both.

                                       n engl j med 380;7     nejm.org     February 14, 2019                                                 663
                                           The New England Journal of Medicine
 Downloaded from nejm.org by GIUSEPPE GIOCOLI on February 18, 2019. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
                             Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
You can also read