Detection of Malicious Miner in Block chain Network - IOPscience
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Detection of Malicious Miner in Block chain Network
To cite this article: Ramya. G. Franklin and A.C. Santha Sheela 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1770 012015
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 46.4.80.155 on 14/07/2021 at 08:35International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
Detection of Malicious Miner in Block chain Network
Ramya. G. Franklin [1], Dr. A.C. Santha Sheela [2]
[1][2] Assistant Professors, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute
of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
[1]mikella.prabu@gmail.com [2] shantha.jasmine@gmail.com
Abstract. The block chain innovation has developed as an alluring answer for
address execution and security issues in disseminated frameworks. Block chain’s open
and dispersed friend topper record ability benefits distributed computing
administrations which require capacities, for example, guaranteed information
provenance, examining, the board of advanced resources, and disseminated agreement.
Block chain’s fundamental agreement system permits to construct a carefully designed
condition, where exchanges on any advanced resources are confirmed by set of genuine
members or excavators. With utilization of solid cryptographic strategies, blocks of
exchanges are binded together to empower permanence on the records. Not with
standing, accomplishing agreement requests computational force from the diggers in
return of attractive prize. Along these lines, eager diggers consistently attempt to abuse
the framework by increasing their mining power. Right now, first talk about block
chain’s capacity in giving guaranteed information provenance in cloud and present
vulnerabilities in block chain cloud. Actualized at the mining pool chief, Silent Time
stamping doesn't require organizing nor any conduct or usage changes in the diggers;
the absence of the execution overheads recognize Silent Time stamping from different
plans which have been proposed yet had constrained achievement by and by. We break
down the ideal assailant conduct against Silent Time stamping and the adequacy of
Silent Time stamping against FAW assault. Quiet Time stamping adequately invalidates
the prize addition of the FAW assault and lessens the ideal FAW aggressor technique to
be either the problematic block-retaining assault (which never presents the retained
block in the undermined pool and gives constrained motivators to a normal assailant) or
legitimate mining.
Keywords—Block chain, Bit coin, Proof of Work (PoW), Mining pool, Economics of
mining, Proof- of-Work, reputation-based mechanism, game theory, block with
holding, distributed ledger, pool mining, block chain security and vulnerability.
1. Introduction
Block chain was originally suggested by S in the White Paper of Bit coin. Nakamoto [1], used to
confirm and store information with the block chain information system, to ensure the security of
information transmission and cryptographic access, and to program and control information with the
canny agreements [2], [3]. As a coordinated utilization of disseminated information stockpiling,
highlight point transmission, accord system, and encryption calculation, block chain has as of late
created hazardous enthusiasm from both scholarly world and industry [4]–[7]. An overview of this
subject can be alluded to [8]. As one of the best uses of the block chain innovation, the security of bit
coin framework depends on block chain innovation [9], in which the exchanges are composed away
from any confining influence record as blocks. Toforestall changes of past exchanges and keep up the
trustworthiness of the record, the members (additionally called excavators) contribute their
computational capacity to create PoW by explaining a hash calculation crypto-baffles [10]. The
excavator taking care of the issue with the quickest speed will get right to account the block and secure
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
the bitcoin compensation from the framework [11]. After the arrangement is unraveled by some digger
and engendered to the Bitcoin organize, Block chain innovation has pulled in gigantic enthusiasm from
wide scope of partners including fund, medicinal services, utilities, land and government offices.
Block chain systems uses a common, disseminated, issue tolerant record stage that each member
in the system can circulate however no element can manage. Block chains expect the nearness of
enemies in the system and invalidate the ill- disposed techniques by outfitting the computing capacities
of the genuine hubs and data traded is strong to control and demolition. The block chain innovation will
be gainful to cloud administrations which have a powerful urge for guaranteed information derivation
and bolster cloud evaluating. To empower information honesty over the open record in a block chain
cloud, cryptographically authorized blocks join in the block chain after an agreement is come to in the
disperse system, where exchanges in the blocks are confirmed by friends of the system.
This mutual record might contain history of each exchange identified with any kind of
advantage independent of its sort: money related, physical, or advanced, that can be checked, observed,
and cleared without contribution of cloud executive. The blend of cryptographic instrument and
disperse open record permits to manufacture any sort of utilization over the block chain without
stressing over trust segments of clients and noxiousness in the block chain empowered cloud
framework. For the excavators to effectively have a block in the block chain, they need to fathom a
computationally challenging crypt o-confuse. The procedure is portrayed in Figure 1. The arrangement
is elusive however simple to confirm, and the trouble is powerfully set by the system. In this manner,
explaining such crypto-perplex includes some significant pitfalls regarding hashing power, power,
equipment and so on., yet prevailing in the challenge compensates well as well. Since mining alone is
expensive and getting reward is so rare, legit diggers want to work in pools. In any case, silly malignant
gatherings can think of their own mining capacity to disturb the other legitimate diggers' tasks.
As indicated by the accord convention, the excavators present the blocks as they are found
without delays; this for the most part lines up with their money related premiums Because it gives them
the aforementioned block prizes and empowers them to progress to the next mining round with a
revamp ped block header for a new mining reward.
Past scientists distinguished mining assaults where the aggressor separates from the said
convention in the undermined pool by effectively controlling and deferring the hour of the block
accommodation, which assaults undermine both the PoW prizes of different diggers and the general
adequacy of the mining exhibitions, squandering computational assets and power. Block- withholding
(BWH) assault retains and defers the block accommodation for all time (the block gets never
submitted), while fork-after-withholding (FAW) assault defers the retained, block until it is activated to
submit it to cause a fork (a block accommodation impact) with an outsider excavator.
Fig 1. Data structure of Bitcon Block Chain
2. Related Works
2.1 With regard to Dangers in Mining
2International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
In this area, we talk about the related writing within the dangers propelled by the mine workers,
egotistical mining, block with holding (BWH) assault, and fork after withholding (FAW) assault. These
assaults successfully diminish the other miners’ rewards and squander their computations. FAW attack,
in specific, it could be a viable assault which adjusts with the sound attacker’s objective of increasing
its claim remunerate. The mine workers can dispatch assaults only on the block chain agreement
calculation by controlling the timing of the piece, counting forever withholding the accommodation in
certain circumstances. In some aspects Narrow minded mining withholds a piece so that the
mineworker can get a head-start on computing the another piece of data and have the rest of the
diggers dispose of and switch from the squares that they have been mining [9], [10].
The affirmation component in which the exchanges are affirmed and considered handled as it
were after adequate number of squares are mined after the exchange carrying square builds resistance
against narrow minded mining; the affirmation component, present by bitcoin and embraced by other
block chain applications is compelling against childish mining since the likelihood of fruitful narrow
minded mining diminishes exponentially with the number of pieces required some time recently the
exchange get affirmed[1].
2.2 Threat Model
Block chain and keyless marks were suggested as an option f or PKI marks, where the creation
of the block chain energizes the exchange of information through the operation of cryptographically
secure keys over a passed on network.
There is no requirement for a focal authority since it is executed by an arrangement of
dispersed records, which records all activities performed on information and is shared among all the
partaking substances. The exchanges in the open record are confirmed by an accord of lion's share of
taking an interest elements. The block chain contains an irrefutable record of each exchange which
can't be changed. Keyless signature tends to the issue of PKI key. Exchange off by decoupling the
strategies for recognizing endorse and genuineness protections from the strategies that are liable for
keeping up the riddle of the keys [4]. The methods for recognizing endorser and uprightness security
are taken care of by cryptographic devices which are browsed the options, for case, digressed
cryptography and keyless cryptography [4]. Instances of keyless cryptography, incorporate single
direction impact free hash capacities. Keyless signature forms incorporate, hashing, total and
production. Keyless signature recognition requires a Keyless Signature Infrastructure (KSI) consisting
of pecking order of co-usable accumulation servers generating worldwide hash trees. KSI check-in is
based on hash capacity protection and open record accessibility (block chain). The record is freely
available and guidelines are in place for cleaning, acceptable agreement and activity are very much
characterized [5]
3International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
3. Proposed System
Rather than simply holding coins in your wallet or securing them a savvy contract (master nodes), a few
coins added irregularity to the way toward staking and casting a ballot with the goal that awful players
make some hard memories controlling results.
In Proof of Staking convention, diggers are picked haphazardly from a pool by holders of the
computerized coin. You can turn into a piece of the pool by staking a specific measure of coins that are
endorsed by their terms and conditions. Staking frameworks can likewise permit appointment in which
every individual representative their democratic rights and earned pay to a confided in party. Those
agents at that point win every one of the prizes for block approval and pay their dedicated supporters
some type of profits as an end-result of their vote.
In our process, we take a cloud data as the input for the block chain network and analysis the
cloud data to find the dis honest miners. We use NoSQL database toconnect the cloud with our
database. Then we create a block chain. The input files should be in the format of
.csv. Then we will check the data by using the confusion matrix without using normalization. We check
the performance of the miners and assign rewards to them. If there is any negative reward found, then
we will identify them as a dishonest miner. The mechanism used in the process is a reward based
mechanism.
3.1 Self-Mining Attacks
Since mining cryptographic forms of money like Bitcoin is hard by a solitary digger because of the
prerequisite of high figuring influence for tackling the crypto-perplex, a lot of excavators for the most
part connive to shape a pool among one another and share the got prize among themselves after
effectively unraveling.
This additionally encourages the individual excavators to create a consistent salary rather than rare
(arbitrary interim) installment, when they mine alone. It is contended that motivators to the pool of fair
excavators can be commanded if there exists a pool of narrow minded diggers that deliberately intends
to nullify crafted by legit excavators by following a childish mining procedure [11] and produce better
income for themselves.
4International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
4. Architecture
Input data Transaction
data
processing
Block chain
creation
Block chain deployment
Miners
compete to
validate
Miners solves the
puzzles
Reward
mechanism
Fig. 2 Architecture of proposed work
Like twofold spending assaults, in egotistical mining assault, the pool mines on their private chain and
distribute it deliberately relying upon the condition of the pool. The states are characterized dependent
on the parameter lead (contrast in lengths of private chain and open chain) and expanding (legit and
egotistical pool are chipping away at various parent blocks).
5. Proof of Work and Mining
Bitcoin block chain embraces the PoW accord convention to approve new blocks in a disperse way. In
each round, the PoW convention chooses a pioneer that is liable for pressing exchanges into a block
and affix this block to block chain. To keep enemies from cornering block chain, the pioneer choice
must be around irregular. Since block chain is permission less and namelessness is characteristically
planned as an objective of block chain, it must consider the Sybil assault where a foe essentially makes
numerous members with various personalities to build its likelihood of being chosen as the pioneer. To
address the above issues, the key thought behind PoW is that a member will be arbitrarily chosen as the
pioneer of each round with a likelihood in relation to its figuring power.
5International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
6. Benefits of the Proposed System
Makes Pool reward system fair
Malicious miners can’t receive unearned rewards.
Prevents misbehaving miners.
No waste of distributed computation resource.
7. Honest Mining Strategy
At the point when an excavator attempts to affix another block to the most recent lawful block by setting
the hash of the most recent block in the header of the new block, we state that the digger mines on the
most recent block. Bitcoin block chain is kept up by diggers in the accompanying way. To urge all
diggers to mine on (keep up) the current block chain, each lawful block disseminates a prize to the
excavator as impetuses. The award of each block comprises of two sections. The initial segment of the
prize is a sure measure of new coins. At the point when an excavator mines another block, the digger is
permitted to put a coin-mint exchange in its mined block that acknowledges this excavator for some new
coins as a piece of the prize. The other piece of the prize is the exchange expenses contained in the
exchanges bundled in the block. FAW assault, consolidating narrow minded mining and BWH, expands
the assailant award past that of BWH aggressor and swears off the excavator's situation experienced by
a BWH assailant. A prize driven levelheaded aggressor is boosted to dispatch FAW assault.
8. Conclusion
In this project the proposed framework types of selfish mining assault on block chains, that ensures high
prizes with minimal effort. we influence fair mining practices to devise an idea of "truth state" for
obstructs during a selfish mining fork. We allot a normal affirmation stature to every exchange to
recognize selfish mining conduct in the system. Our proposed calculation successfully prevents selfish
mining and supports reasonable mining rehearses. In future, we plan to assess the charge overhead of
adding the evaluated affirmation stature in every exchange just as the processing overhead of applying
our calculation at the product customer. By applying the notoriety based instrument we structured,
diggers keep an eye on genuine mining for higher gathered advantages and eventually accomplish an
accord on stable state. This framework proposes a notoriety based system that urges discerning
excavators to mine honestly.
References
[1] T Mc Conaghy, etal., “Bigchain DB : a scalable block chain database, ” 2016.
https://www.bigchaindb.com/whitepaper/bigc haindb.com
[2] Y Yuan, and F Wang, “Block chain: The state of the art and future trends,” Acta Automatica
Sinica (Chinese), vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 481-494, 2016.
[3] P Sharma, S Singh, Y Jeong, and J Park, “Dist. Block Net: a distributed block chains-based
secure SDN architecture for IoT networks,” IEEE Commune. Mag., vol 55, no. 9, pp. 78-85,
2017.
[4] Y Zhang, R Deng, J Shu, K Yang and D Zheng, “TKSE: trustworthy keyword search over
encrypted data with two-side verifiability via block chain,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 31077-
31087, 2018
[5] Y A Lei, H Cruickshank, Y Cao, P Asuquo, C Anyigor Ogah, and Z Sun, “Block chain-based
dynamic key management for heterogeneous intelligent transportation systems,” IEEE Internet
Things., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1832- 1843, 2017
[6] Y Zhao, Y Li, Q Mu, B Yang, and Y Yu, “Secure pub- sub: block chain based fair payment
with reputation for reliable cyber physical systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 12295-12303,
2018 ✓ Conclusion ✓ Future Work ✓ References
6International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
[7] Z Zheng, S Xie, H Dai, X Chen, and H Wang, “An overview of block chain technology:
architecture, consensus, and future trends,” in 2017 IEEE Int. Congr. Big Data, Honolulu, HI,
USA, pp. 557-564, Jun. 25-30, 2017
[8] F Tschorsch and B Scheuermann, “Bitcoin and beyond: a technical survey on decentralized
digital currencies,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 3, pp.
2084- 2123, 2016.
[9] C Tang, Z Yang, Z Zheng, Z Chen, and X Li, “Analysis and optimization of game dilemma in
PoW consensus algorithm,” Acta Automatica Sinica (Chinese), vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1520-1531,
2017
[10] Bentov, C Lee, A Mizrahi, and M Rosenfeld, “Proof of activity: extending Bitcoin’s proof of
work via proof of stake,” ACM SIGMETRICS, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 34-37, 2014
[11] Y Kwon, D Kim, Y Son, E Vasserman, and Y Kim, “Be selfish and avoid dilemmas: fork after
withholding (FAW) attacks on bitcoin,” in Proc. 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conf. Computer and
Communications Security, Dallas, Texas, USA, pp. 195-209, Oct. 30-Nov. 3, 2017.
[12] K Nayak, S Kumar, A Miller, and E Shi, “Stubborn mining: generalizing selfish mining and
combining with an eclipse attack,” in 2016 IEEE European Symp. Security and Privacy,
Saarbrucken, Germany, pp. 305- 320, Mar. 21-24, 2016.
[13] Eyal, “The miner’s dilemma,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE Symp. Security and Privacy, San Jose, CA,
USA, pp. 89-103, May 17-21, 2015
[14] S Bag, S Ruj, and K Sakurai, “Bitcoin block withholding attack: analysis and mitigation,”
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1967-1978, 2017
[15] D K Tosh, et al., “Security implications of block chain cloud with analysis of block
withholding attack,” in Proc. 17th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing,
Madrid, Spain, pp. 458-467, May 14-17, 2017.
[16] Eyal and E Sirer, “Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable,” Commun. ACM,
vol. 61, no.7, pp. 95-102,2018
[17] H Hu, W Yu, G Wen, Q Xuan, and J Cao, “Reverse group consensus of multi-agent systems in
the cooperation-competition network,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 63, no.
11, pp. 2036-2047, 2016
[18] H Shen, Y Lin, K. Sapra, and Z Li, “Enhancing collusion resilience in reputation systems,”
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2274-2287, 2016.
[19] Y Zhao, et al., “Secure pub-sub: Blockchain-based fair payment with reputation for reliable
cyber physical systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 12295-12303, 2018
[20] J A Kroll, I C Davey, and E W Felten, “The economics of Bitcoin mining or, Bitcoin in the
presence of adversaries,” The Twelfth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security
(WEIS 2013), Washington, DC, Jun. 11-12, 2013..
[21] Vengaten S, M Wilferd Roshan, S Prince Mary, and D Usha Nandini. "Track Me & Unlock:
Secured Mutual Authentication System of Integrating Phone Unlock & Women’s Safety
Application using MEMS." In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol.
590, no. 1, p. 012004. IOP Publishing, 2019(SCOPUS).
[22] J Refonaa, M Lakshmi, Vivek J(2015), “Analysis and prediction of natural disaster using
spatial data mining technique, IEEE International Conference on Circuit, Power and
Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), 2015 , IEEE, PP. 1-6 issue indexed in WOS,SCOPUS and
GOOGLE SCHOLAR.
[23] S L Jany Shabu, C Jayakumar (2016), “Detection of Brain Tumor by Image Fusion Using
Genetic Algorithm”, Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences,
Vol.7, Issue.5, pp.no.505-511. [Scopus].
[24] M Selvi, P M Joe Prathap, Secure Data Aggregation Protocol with Efficient Energy in Sensor
7International Conference on Mathematical Sciences (ICMS 2020) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1770 (2021) 012015 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1770/1/012015
Networks, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-
3878, Vol. 8 Issue-4, November 2019.(SCOPUS)
8You can also read
