Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE - European ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank
Criteri di ricerca utilizzati per generare l''elenco :
Ordina Mostra per data
Parole chiave "elaborazione del diritto dell'UE"
307 Risultati(i)
Data di creazione : 13-12-2021Research for REGI Committee: Cohesion Policy Calendar (2021-2027 and 2014-2020 Programming
Periods)
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data18-11-2021
AutoreHAASE Diana
Settore di interventoSviluppo regionale | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave coesione economica e sociale | commissione PE | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | politica regionale dell'UE | relazione
interistituzionale (UE)
Riassunto The implementation timetable for cohesion policy is defined largely by its legislative framework. In order to be able to
plan parliamentary work and exercise systematic scrutiny of policy implementation and of the Commission’s work, it is
essential to have an overview of the timing of different steps in policy implementation in the coming years. This type of
briefing was first published (and subsequently updated) in 2014 covering the 2014-2020 programming period. The
current version is the first in the row that includes the policy actions of the 2021-27 period, while still indicating the last
steps of the 2014-20 period. It includes a detailed (but non-exhaustive) timetable of policy actions in the second half of
2021 and in 2022, together with an overview of major actions for the remainder of the programming period, from 2023.
Briefing EN
Horizon Europe: Framework programme for research and innovation 2021–2027
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 02-07-2021
Autore WILSON Alex Benjamin
Settore di intervento Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave CEEA | cooperazione scientifica | diffusione delle innovazioni | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | formazione
professionale | innovazione | politica di ricerca dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | proposta (UE) |
ricerca nucleare | ripartizione del finanziamento dell'UE | sicurezza nucleare | studio d'impatto
Riassunto In June 2018, the European Commission proposed a total budget allocation of €100 billion to finance science, research
and innovation projects during the 2021-2027 period, of which the vast majority, €94.1 billion in current prices, would
be allocated to the Horizon Europe framework programme. The main aims are to strengthen science and technology,
to foster industrial competiveness, and to implement the sustainable development goals in the EU. Horizon Europe
introduces new features such as the European Innovation Council, missions to promote research results, and new
forms of partnerships. Horizon Europe also aims at reducing administrative burdens and promoting the concept of
open science. More operational synergies are expected through better linkage with other EU programmes. In March
2019, Parliament and Council reached a partial agreement on most aspects of Horizon Europe. However, the financial
aspects were only settled in December 2020 as part of the broader MFF negotiations, together with the sensitive issue
of third-country association. The final text was adopted in April 2021 and entered into force retroactively from 1
January 2021. Third edition of a briefing originally drafted by Cemal Karakas. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings
are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
European Defence Fund: Multiannual financial framework 2021-2027
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data02-07-2021
AutoreKARABOYTCHEVA Miroslava Kostova
Settore di interventoIndustria
Parole chiave bilancio della difesa | cooperazione militare | cooperazione UE-NATO | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | fondo (UE) |
politica di sicurezza e di difesa comune | politica europea di difesa | programma d'azione | programma dell'UE |
proposta (UE) | relazione | ricerca e sviluppo | sicurezza europea | Stato membro UE | sviluppo industriale
Riassunto In June 2018, the European Commission presented a legislative proposal on a European Defence Fund, including a
budget allocation of €11.5 billion in constant 2018 prices for the 2021-2027 period. The proposal aimed to streamline
and simplify the set-up in place at the time by integrating the Preparatory Action on Defence Research (research
window) and the European Defence Industrial Development Programme (as one part of the capability window) into a
single Fund. The main aims of the Fund would be to foster the competitiveness and innovativeness of European
defence and to contribute to the EU's strategic autonomy. In this regard, the Fund would inter alia support collaborative
industrial projects; co finance the costs of prototype development; encourage the participation of small and medium-
sized enterprises; and promote projects in the framework of permanent structured cooperation. Synergies were
expected with other EU initiatives in the field of cybersecurity, maritime transport, border management, Horizon
Europe, the space programme and the European Peace Facility. In April 2019, after several trilogue meetings,
Parliament and Council reached a partial agreement on the Fund, covering the content, but not, among other things,
budgetary issues. Parliament adopted its position at first reading in April 2019. A provisional political agreement on the
outstanding issues was reached in December 2020. The Council adopted its first-reading position in March 2021 and
the Parliament adopted the text at second reading on 29 April. The final act was published in the Official Journal on 12
May.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 1Own resources of the European Union: Reforming the EU's financing system
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data09-06-2021
AutoreD'ALFONSO Alessandro
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Bilanci
Parole chiave bilancio generale (UE) | dazi doganali | decisione (UE) | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione finanziaria | IVA |
politica di bilancio | procedura di bilancio | quadro finanziario pluriennale | risorse proprie
Riassunto On 1 June 2021, the decision that reforms the financing system of the EU budget entered into force, following its
ratification by all Member States. It introduces three significant innovations in the own resources system, applying
retroactively from 1 January 2021. The maximum level of resources that can be called from Member States
permanently rises from 1.20 % to 1.40 % of EU gross national income (GNI). A temporary increase in the own
resources ceiling, worth a further 0.60 % of EU GNI, is devoted exclusively to the financing of Next Generation
(NGEU), enabling the Commission to borrow resources on an unprecedented scale on the capital markets, with a view
to financing the recovery. A national contribution linked to non-recycled plastic packaging waste is introduced, the first
new EU own resource to be created since 1988. In addition, Parliament pushed for a broader reform of the financing
system underlining that the introduction of a basket of new own resources should cover at least the repayment costs of
NGEU (for both principal and interest). Parliament managed to include a detailed roadmap for the introduction of
various additional new own resources by 2026 in the interinstitutional agreement on budgetary matters with the Council
and the European Commission. Envisaged resources are linked to EU policies on climate and the single market.
Fourth edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative
procedure.
Briefing EN
New European Commission communication on Better Regulation: Joining forces to make better laws
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 28-05-2021
Autore ANGLMAYER Irmgard | VETTORAZZI STEFANO
Settore di intervento Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici
Parole chiave Commissione europea | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | iniziative di regolamentazione | relazione | trasparenza del
processo decisionale
Riassunto Better Regulation ensures that EU policies and laws are prepared in an open, transparent manner, informed by the
best available evidence and backed by comprehensive stakeholder involvement so that they achieve their objectives at
minimum cost. It is a dynamic agenda that has gradually evolved in the European Commission since the early 2000s.
Today's Better Regulation agenda covers the whole policy cycle. It was shaped under the Juncker Commission
presidency, which formally declared it a priority, with the aim of strengthening the effectiveness, transparency and
accountability of its actions across all policy areas. The comprehensive Better Regulation package of 2015 presented a
strategy, guidelines and a toolbox, and established the Regulatory Scrutiny Board as the Commission's regulatory
oversight body. It also paved the way for the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making (IIA-BLM) concluded
by the Commission, Parliament and Council in April 2016, and which, inter alia, defines their respective roles and
responsibilities in the regulatory process. Following a revision in 2017, the Commission took stock of the Better
Regulation agenda in 2019, concluding that in a post-fact world, evidence-based policy-making remains an imperative.
The long-awaited new Commission communication, adopted on 29 April 2021, draws lessons from the Better
Regulation stocktaking review. At the same time, it sets out a policy-making framework that aims at supporting post-
crisis recovery and the twin digital and green transformation, in line with the Commission's intention to advance the
Better Regulation agenda further, with 'future-proof legislation that can stand the test of time'.
Briefing EN
The role of the European Council in negotiating the 2021-27 MFF
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data09-04-2021
AutoreDRACHENBERG Ralf
Settore di interventoBilanci | Coronavirus | Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave autorizzazione di bilancio | bilancio dell'UE | competenza istituzionale (UE) | Consiglio europeo | elaborazione del
diritto dell'UE | politica di bilancio | quadro finanziario pluriennale | spesa dell'UE
Riassunto To assess the role of the European Council in the process of the adoption of the multiannual financial framework and
its evolution over time, this paper provides a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences between the
European Council's involvement in the 20142020 and 20212027 MFF negotiations. An additional content analysis of
EU leaders' Twitter communication on the MFF focuses in particular on key moments in the European Council's
decision-making process. The 20212027 MFF negotiations provide yet another example of the ways in which EU
leaders not only intervene in the parts of the policy cycle envisaged for the European Council in the Treaties, but
extend the scope of their involvement and influence, to areas where this is expressly prohibited by the Treaties, such
as regarding legislation. The European Council's involvement in legislative matters against the letter of the Treaties
can be considered both as 'déjà vu' and as a further evolution of its involvement.
Analisi approfondita EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 2Water reuse: Setting minimum requirements
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 20-04-2020
Autore HALLEUX Vivienne
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Ambiente
Parole chiave acque di scarico | consumo idrico | distribuzione idrica | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | fabbisogno idrico | irrigazione |
proposta (UE) | protezione dell'ambiente | risorse idriche | sanità pubblica | trattamento dell'acqua | utilizzazione
dell'acqua
Riassunto Although freshwater is relatively abundant in the European Union (EU), water stress occurs in many areas, particularly
in the Mediterranean region and parts of the Atlantic region, with environmental and economic impacts. In May 2018,
the European Commission put forward a proposal for a regulation setting EU-wide standards that reclaimed water
would need to meet in order to be used for agricultural irrigation, with the aim of encouraging greater use of reclaimed
water and contributing to alleviating water scarcity. The Commission estimates that the proposal could increase water
reuse in agricultural irrigation from 1.7 billion m³ to 6.6 billion m³ per year, thereby reducing water stress by 5 %. The
European Parliament adopted its first-reading position on 12 February 2019, and the Council agreed on a general
approach on 26 June 2019. Trilogue negotiations concluded with a provisional agreement on 2 December. The agreed
text, endorsed by the ENVI committee on 21 January 2020, was adopted at first reading by the Council on 7 April. It
now returns to the Parliament for final adoption at second reading. Second edition of a briefing originally drafted by
Didier Bourguignon. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative
procedure.
Briefing EN
Parliament's right of legislative initiative
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 12-02-2020
Autore KOTANIDIS Silvia
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici
Parole chiave competenza istituzionale (UE) | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | iniziativa legislativa | potere d'iniziativa | potere
legislativo
Riassunto The European Commission has a near monopoly on legislative initiative in the European Union (EU), with special
initiative rights for other institutions applying only in certain specific cases. However, the European Parliament and the
Council may invite the Commission to submit legislative proposals. Whilst this 'indirect' initiative right does not create
an obligation on the Commission to propose the legislation requested, the Treaty of Lisbon codified the Commission's
obligation to provide reasons for any refusal to follow a parliamentary initiative. Against this backdrop, some argue that
Parliament could take the Commission to the Court of Justice of the EU if it fails to justify a negative decision. Others
see Parliament's increasing participation in overall political planning – particularly through negotiations on the
Commission's annual work programme (CWP) – as a further channel for Parliament to increase its influence on EU
legislation. It is thus argued that the increased role of Parliament in the legislative procedure should have reduced the
need for its Members to make use of legislative initiatives. Notwithstanding that, there is a trend towards greater use of
formal parliamentary legislative initiatives to assert greater influence on the political process. Most recently, in her
inaugural address in July 2019 and in her Political Guidelines, the then newly elected President of the European
Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, pledged to strengthen the partnership with the European Parliament, inter alia, by
responding with a proposal for a legislative act whenever Parliament, acting by a majority of its members, adopts a
resolution requesting that the Commission submit legislative proposals. She added that this commitment would have to
be in full respect of the proportionality, subsidiarity and better law-making principles. President von der Leyen also
declared herself supportive of moves towards recognition of a right for Parliament of legislative initiative. This briefing
is an update of a European Parliament Library briefing from 2013, by Eva-Maria Poptcheva.
Briefing EN
Multimedia European Parliament’s legislative initiative
European business statistics
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 15-01-2020
Autore DELIVORIAS Angelos
Settore di intervento Problemi economici e monetari
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | formalità amministrativa | impresa | metodo statistico | raccolta dei dati | scambio
d'informazioni | semplificazione legislativa | statistica economica | statistiche dell'UE
Riassunto In the context of the work of reviewing the fitness of current regulations (REFIT), the Commission has decided to
amend Regulation (EC) No 184/2005 and repeal 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The aim is to reduce
the administrative burden for businesses, especially SMEs, and to put an end to legal fragmentation in the field of
European business statistics. The Commission is proposing to establish a common legal framework for the
development, production and dissemination of European statistics related to business structure, economic activities
and performance, as well as on international transactions and research and development activities in the EU economy;
and for the European network of national statistical business registers and the EuroGroups Register. The regulation
includes provisions covering business registers, the data sources to be used, and the exchange of confidential data for
the purpose of intra-Union trade in goods statistics. The final act was signed on 27 November 2019 and published in
the Official Journal on 17 December 2019. It will apply from 1 January 2021, with the exception of certain articles,
which will apply from 1 January 2022. Second edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key
stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 3The powers of the European Parliament
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data04-11-2019
AutoreTILINDYTE-HUMBURG Laura
Settore di interventoDemocrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave accordo (UE) | bilancio dell'UE | Commissione europea | competenza istituzionale (UE) | controllo parlamentare |
elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | nomina dei membri | Parlamento europeo | relazione interistituzionale (UE) | storia
dell'Europa
Riassunto Since its inception in 1951, the European Parliament has come a long way. Initially a consultative body composed of
delegations of national parliaments, it became a directly elected institution, obtained budgetary and legislative powers,
and now exercises influence over most aspects of EU affairs. Together with representatives of national governments,
who sit in the Council, Parliament co-decides on European legislation, in what could be seen as a bicameral legislature
at EU level. It can reject or amend the European Commission's proposals before adopting them so that they become
law. Together with the Council of the EU, it adopts the EU budget and controls its implementation. Another core set of
European Parliament prerogatives concerns the scrutiny of the EU executive – mainly the Commission. Such scrutiny
can take many forms, including parliamentary questions, committees of inquiry and special committees, and scrutiny of
delegated and implementing acts. Parliament has made use of these instruments to varying degrees. Parliament has
the power to dismiss the Commission (motion of censure), and it plays a significant role in the latter's appointment
process. Parliament has a say over the very foundations of the EU. Its consent is required before any new country
joins the EU, and before a withdrawal treaty is concluded if a country decides to leave it. Most international
agreements entered into by the EU with third countries also require Parliament's consent. Parliament can initiate
Treaty reform, and also the 'Article 7(1) TEU' procedure, aimed at determining whether there is a (risk of) serious
breach of EU values by a Member State.
Briefing EN
How EU Treaties are changed
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 20-09-2019
Autore TILINDYTE-HUMBURG Laura
Settore di intervento Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | revisione del trattato (UE)
Riassunto The EU's founding Treaties have been revised by the Member States in numerous rounds of reforms. Such Treaty
revision is a way to ensure that EU primary law evolves, adapts, and responds to new developments and changing
needs. The last comprehensive Treaty reform dates back to the Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force on 1
December 2009. While another comprehensive Treaty change is not yet on the agenda, the recent debates on the
'Future of Europe' triggered a number of reform proposals, some of which would necessitate revision of the EU
Treaties. Such revision is governed by Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which provides for two main
procedures: the ordinary and the simplified revision procedures. The former applies to the TEU, to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and to the Euratom Treaty; the latter only to part of the TFEU.
In sintesi EN
CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data30-08-2019
AutoreERBACH Gregor
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Ambiente | Trasporti
Parole chiave accesso all'informazione dell'UE | accordo internazionale | automobile | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | inquinamento
automobilistico | lotta contro l'inquinamento | meccanica generale | proposta (UE) | quota di emissione dell'UE | veicolo
a motore | veicolo industriale
Riassunto In May 2018, the Commission proposed a regulation setting the first-ever CO2 emission performance standards for
new heavy-duty vehicles in the EU, as part of the third mobility package. It would require the average CO2 emissions
from new trucks in 2025 to be 15 % lower than in 2019. For 2030, the proposal sets an indicative reduction target of at
least 30 % compared to 2019. Special incentives are provided for zero- and low-emission vehicles. The proposed
regulation applies to four categories of large trucks, which together account for 65 %-70 % of CO2 emissions from
heavy-duty vehicles. The Commission proposes to review the legislation in 2022 in order to set a binding target for
2030, and to extend its application to smaller trucks, buses, coaches and trailers. In the European Parliament, the
proposal was referred to the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, which adopted its report on
18 October 2018. Parliament voted on the report on 14 November. Trilogue negotiations were concluded on 18
February 2019 with an agreement that sets a legally binding 30 % reduction target for the average fleet emissions of
new trucks by 2030. The Parliament adopted it during the April II 2019 plenary session, and the Council on 13 June.
The Regulation was published in the Official Journal on 25 July and entered into force on 14 August 2019.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 4Ensuring more transparent and predictable working conditions
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 26-08-2019
Autore KISS Monika
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Occupazione
Parole chiave condizioni di lavoro | consultazione pubblica | contratto collettivo | contratto di lavoro | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE |
informazione dei lavoratori | licenziamento | periodo di tirocinio | politica dell'occupazione dell'UE | proposta (UE) |
studio d'impatto
Riassunto An employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to their contracts is regulated by Directive
91/533/EEC. Major shifts in the labour market due to demographic trends and digitalisation, spawning a growing
number of non-standard employment relationships, have made it necessary to revise this directive. The European
Commission therefore came forward with a proposal for a directive aimed at updating and extending the information on
employment-related obligations and working conditions, and at creating new minimum standards for all employed
workers, including those on atypical contracts. In the European Parliament, the Committee for Employment and Social
Affairs (EMPL) considered the proposal and adopted a report focusing in particular on the scope, on employees'
working hours, on the conditions for making information available to them, and on employers' responsibilities.
Following trilogue negotiations, the European Parliament and the Council reached an agreement on the content of the
draft legislation. The final act was signed on 20 June 2019 and published in the Official Journal on 11 July 2019.
Member States have until 1 August 2022 to take the necessary measures to comply with the new directive. Third
edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Impact Assessment and European Added Value work during the eighth legislative term, 2014-2019
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 03-07-2019
Autore HILLER WOLFGANG
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Recepimento e attuazione del
diritto | Valore aggiunto europeo | Valutazione d''impatto ex ante | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | elaborazione delle politiche | legislazione | studio d'impatto
Riassunto The responsibility for better law-making is shared between the European Union institutions. In recent years Parliament
has developed its own instruments to guarantee proper and independent assessment and to support parliamentary
committees in their work. The concept of impact assessment is applied throughout the whole policy cycle – on both an
ex-ante and an ex-post basis – from the design of legislation through to its implementation, evaluation and revision.
The European Parliament also advocates a proper assessment of European added value, in terms of what savings will
result from a European solution and if supplementary costs would arise in the absence of a European solution. This
briefing provides a look back over five years’ experience in support of better regulation for the benefit of citizens.
Briefing EN
Continuation of work in progress from last term
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 28-06-2019
Autore GROSEK Kristina
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | elezioni europee | mandato elettivo
Riassunto With European elections held on 23-26 May 2019, the eighth parliamentary term formally ends on 1 July 2019, a day
before the constituent part-session of the newly elected Parliament. Despite the efforts of the co-legislators, agreement
could not be found on a number of legislative proposals before the end of the parliamentary term, and these form a
major part of the business that needs to be picked up again in the new term. In order to ensure continuity in its work,
therefore, Parliament has adopted rules on how to deal with unfinished files.
In sintesi EN
Amending the bank resolution framework – BRRD and SRMR
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 28-06-2019
Autore STAMEGNA CARLA
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Problemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e
bancarie
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | impresa in difficoltà | istituto finanziario | norma tecnica |
regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione bancaria dell'UE
Riassunto In May 2019, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the proposals amending the EU legislative framework
on bank resolution, consisting of the Banking Recovery and Resolution Directive, and the Single Resolution
Mechanism Regulation. Resolution is the restructuring of a bank which is failing or likely to fail, aiming at safeguarding
continuity of the bank's critical functions, preserving financial stability and minimising rescue costs to taxpayers. The
adopted amendments incorporate into EU law the Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity standard, set at international level to
improve large financial institutions' capacity to absorb losses and recapitalise in case they are placed in resolution. The
new legislative texts were published in the Official Journal on 7 June 2019, and come fully into force on 28 December
2020.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 5EU fertilising products
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 26-06-2019
Autore HALLEUX Vivienne
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Agricoltura e sviluppo rurale | Mercato interno e Unione
doganale | Protezione dei consumatori | Sanità pubblica
Parole chiave ammendamento del terreno | autorizzazione di vendita | cadmio | concime | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | industria
dei fertilizzanti | marcatura CE di conformità | norma ambientale | riciclaggio dei rifiuti
Riassunto Fertilising products are used to improve plant growth, mainly in agriculture, enabling higher crop yields. However, they
are associated with some challenges as regards security of supply, the environment and health. Although the 2003
Fertilisers Regulation, which aimed at ensuring an internal market in fertilisers, has been effective, it mainly addresses
mineral fertilisers and deters the introduction of new types of fertilisers. In March 2016, the Commission put forward a
legislative proposal on fertilising products, as announced in the circular economy action plan. The proposal modernises
the conformity assessment and market surveillance in line with the ‘new legislative framework’ for product legislation,
covers a wider range of fertilising products (including those manufactured from secondary raw materials), and sets
limits for the presence of heavy metals and contaminants in fertilising products. After completion of the legislative
procedure, the final act was signed on 5 June 2019. The regulation will apply in full from 16 July 2022. Fifth edition of a
briefing originally drafted by Didier Bourguignon. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages
throughout the legislative procedure. Please note this document has been designed for on-line viewing.
Briefing EN
Single-use plastics and fishing gear: Reducing marine litter
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 17-06-2019
Autore HALLEUX Vivienne
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Ambiente
Parole chiave bene non durevole | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione dei rifiuti | impatto ambientale | industria della pesca |
inquinamento marino | lotta contro l'inquinamento | materia plastica | politica ambientale dell'UE | proposta (UE) |
protezione dell'ambiente | rifiuti | studio d'impatto
Riassunto Most of the plastic in our oceans originates from land-based sources. On European beaches, plastics make up 80-85
% of marine litter, which is considered a major threat to marine and coastal biodiversity. Marine litter also costs the
European Union economy an estimated €259 million to €695 million per year. In May 2018, the European Commission
put forward a legislative proposal seeking to address the issue of marine litter from plastics. The proposal would
introduce a series of measures regarding the top 10 single-use plastics found on European beaches, as well as fishing
gear, with a view to reducing their impact on the environment and ensuring a functional internal market. After
completion of the legislative procedure, the final act was signed by the presidents of the co-legislators (European
Parliament and Council) on 5 June 2019, and published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 12 June 2019.
Member States have two years (i.e. until 3 July 2021) to transpose the new directive into national law. Fourth edition of
a briefing originally drafted by Didier Bourguignon. document has been designed for on-line viewing.
Briefing EN
Interoperability between EU border and security information systems
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 14-06-2019
Autore LUYTEN KATRIEN | VORONOVA Sofija
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | ammissione di stranieri | biometria | controllo alla frontiera | dati personali | elaborazione del
diritto dell'UE | frontiere esterne dell'UE | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | protezione dei
dati | scambio d'informazioni | sistema di informazione | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Riassunto To enhance EU external border management and internal security, the European Commission has made several
proposals to upgrade and expand European border and security information systems. As part of a broader process to
maximise their use, the Commission presented legislative proposals for two regulations in December 2017 (amended
in June 2018), establishing an interoperability framework between EU information systems on borders and visas, and
on police and judicial cooperation, asylum and migration. After completion of the legislative procedure at first reading in
the Parliament and in the Council, the final acts were signed by the co-legislators on 20 May 2019 and published in the
Official Journal two days later. Both acts came into force on 11 June 2019. The new rules aim to improve checks at the
EU’s external borders, allow for better detection of security threats and identity fraud, and help in preventing and
combating irregular migration. Third edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages
throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 6The power of the European Parliament: Examples of EP impact during the 2014-19 legislative term
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data30-04-2019
Autore esterno DG, EPRS;
Settore di interventoDemocrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave analisi delle informazioni | competenza del PE | controllo parlamentare | diffusione di informazioni sull'UE |
elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | mandato elettivo | Parlamento europeo | recesso dall'UE | relazioni dell'Unione
europea | revisione del trattato (UE) | scarico del bilancio | strategia UE
Riassunto As the only European Union institution elected directly, the European Parliament is at the heart of representative
democracy, the foundation upon which the EU is built. Since its creation, the Parliament’s powers have evolved
significantly, transforming it into a full-fledged legislative body and forum of discussion and engagement, whose
influence is felt in virtually all areas of EU activity. This paper provides an overview of the European Parliament's main
powers, demonstrating how they interact, and illustrating through practical examples from the most recent
parliamentary term (2014-2019) the various ways in which the Parliament uses those powers in its daily work.
Analisi approfondita DE, EN, FR
Cross-border euro transfers and currency conversions: A step forward in favour of the single market
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data29-04-2019
AutoreSPINACI STEFANO
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Problemi economici e monetari
Parole chiave automazione del sistema bancario | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | istituto finanziario | mercato unico | pagamento |
pagamento intra UE | proposta (UE) | regolamentazione finanziaria | relazione | servizi finanziari | spese bancarie |
zona euro
Riassunto Cross-border payments are crucial for the integration of the EU economy, and play an important role in ensuring that
citizens and enterprises from all EU Member States enjoy the same rights offered by the single market. Since the
introduction of the euro, the EU has launched various initiatives to reduce the cost of cross-border transactions, among
them a set of single euro payments area (SEPA) standards, regulations on cross-border payments, and the Payment
Services Directives. Nevertheless, cross-border euro payments made in non-euro-area Member States are still subject
to high fees. Furthermore, when paying with a card or making an ATM withdrawal in a country using a currency other
than the euro, it is almost impossible to know exactly how much it is going to cost. On 28 March 2018, the European
Commission presented a proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 on cross-border payments.
Working through the legislative process, Parliament and Council reached agreement on an amended text, published in
the Official Journal on 19 March 2019. The new regulation will make cross-border payments in euros cheaper across
the entire EU, while also bringing more transparency to currency-conversion practices. Second edition. The ‘EU
Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Limits on exposure to carcinogens and mutagens at work: Second proposal
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data15-03-2019
AutoreSCHOLZ Nicole
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Occupazione | Sanità pubblica
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | malattia professionale | norma di sicurezza | olio minerale | prevenzione delle malattie
| sanità del lavoro | sostanza cancerogena | sostanza tossica
Riassunto The European Commission has proposed to amend Directive 2004/37/EC, by expanding its scope and by including
and/or revising occupational exposure limit values for a number of cancer- or mutation-causing chemical agents. The
initiative is proceeding in steps. The first proposal, submitted in May 2016, covered 13 priority chemical agents. The
current (second) proposal addresses a further seven agents. Broad discussions with scientists and the social partners
fed into both proposals. On the whole, trade unions and employers welcomed the current proposal. Trilogue
agreement was reached on 11 October 2018. As proposed by the European Parliament, diesel engine exhaust
emissions were included in the scope of the directive. After completion of the legislative procedure, the final act was
signed by the presidents of the co-legislators on 16 January 2019. Directive (EU) 2019/130 entered into force on 20
February 2019 and is to be transposed into national laws within two years, by 20 February 2021 at the latest. Third
edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 7Reform of the Qualification Directive
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 20-02-2019
Autore RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave diritto d'asilo | diritto di soggiorno | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | politica migratoria dell'UE
Riassunto The current refugee and migrant crisis in Europe has called into question existing EU legislation on asylum, in
particular the criteria according to which applicants for international protection can qualify for refugee or subsidiary
protection status, as recognised in the Qualification Directive. Although national asylum rules are more closely aligned
than they were, major differences in approach persist across the EU. This can lead asylum-seekers to claim refuge in
Member States whose asylum systems appear to be more generous, rather than in the Member State officially
responsible for their asylum applications. The Commission's proposal of 13 July 2016 proposes to replace the
Qualification Directive with a regulation, setting uniform standards for the recognition of people in need of protection
and for the rights granted to beneficiaries of international protection. Although Parliament and Council negotiators
reached provisional agreement on the text in June 2018, this has not been confirmed by the Council, with further steps
as yet to be determined. Second edition of a briefing originally drafted by Detelin Ivanov. The 'EU Legislation in
Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
The Audiovisual Media Services Directive
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data25-01-2019
AutoreKATSAROVA Ivana
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Cultura
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | industria degli audiovisivi | libertà d'espressione | prestazione di servizi | produzione
audiovisiva | protezione dell'infanzia | pubblicità | radiotrasmissioni | regolamentazione delle telecomunicazioni |
servizio d’interesse generale | vendita a distanza
Riassunto Following political agreement with the Council, a vote in plenary on 2 October 2018 saw Parliament adopt the updated
EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive, based on the proposal presented by the Commission on 25 May 2016. The
overarching goal of the proposal was to bring about a balance between competitiveness and consumer protection. It
therefore aimed to introduce flexibility when restrictions only applicable to TV are no longer justified, promote European
films, protect minors and tackle hate speech more efficiently. The proposal also reflected a new approach to online
platforms. Following adoption of the revised directive, EU Member States now have to bring the new rules into national
law by 19 September 2020. Sixth edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at key stages
throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Reform of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data11-01-2019
AutorePUCCIO Laura
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Occupazione
Parole chiave aiuto all'occupazione | aiuto finanziario | bilancio generale (UE) | elaborazione del bilancio | elaborazione del diritto
dell'UE | Fondo europeo di adeguamento alla globalizzazione | globalizzazione | licenziamento | proposta (UE) |
recessione economica | reinserimento professionale
Riassunto The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was created in 2006 to finance active labour market policies
targeting workers who have lost their jobs because of trade adjustment. The fund was subsequently modified in 2009
to cover major structural changes triggered by the economic and financial crisis. The rules of the EGF are laid down in
EU Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013, which stipulates that the fund will continue to be financed until 31 December 2020.
In May 2018, the European Commission submitted a proposal to reform the EGF and maintain it as a special
instrument outside the MFF ceiling. The proposal introduces modifications to the eligibility criteria, the co-financing
rules and the mobilisation procedure. The report was voted in the EMPL committee on 27 November 2018, and the
report is due to be debated in plenary in January 2019, with a view to finalising Parliament's position for trilogue
negotiations. Second edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the
legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Multimedia Reform of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
Transposition of EU legislation into domestic law: Challenges faced by National Parliaments
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data21-11-2018
Autore esterno Wim Voermans, Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Leiden University
Settore di interventoBilanci | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici
Parole chiave diritto dell'UE-diritto nazionale | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | Parlamento europeo | parlamento nazionale | relazioni
interistituzionali
Riassunto National Parliaments have emancipated themselves into the EU legislative process and have become more actively
involved at the European level. This briefing provides an analysis of the role of National Parliaments in the process of
transposition of EU legislation – a mere segment of the overall implementation process.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 8Financing bank resolution: An alternative solution for arranging the liquidity required
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data21-11-2018
Autore esterno W.P. De Groen, CEPS
Settore di interventoProblemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave banca centrale | controllo della liquidità | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | impresa in difficoltà |
istituto finanziario | norma tecnica | regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione
bancaria dell'UE | zona euro
Riassunto Liquidity in resolution is one of the unresolved elements of the Single Resolution Mechanism. Currently, with the Single
Resolution Fund (SRF) and the Eurosystem, there are two potential sources of liquidity in resolution, which both have
clear limitations in use and amounts. Straightforward solutions to give the SRF and/or Eurosystem more firepower in
resolution go against the main objectives of the resolution mechanism (i.e. breaking the sovereign-bank nexus and
avoiding use of taxpayers’ money). This paper proposes an ECB liquidity facility with an SRF-guarantee as an
alternative solution for banks in resolution. The funds available should be broadly sufficient to address potential
liquidity needs for resolution tools. The proposed solution primarily requires agreement on the ESM-backstop for the
SRF, a firmer commitment for (possible) future contributions for the SRF as well as a change to the current emergency
liquidity assistance or introduction of a new dedicated Transitional Liquidity Assistance by the Eurosystem.
Analisi approfondita EN
Transposition, implementation and enforcement of Union law
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 15-11-2018
Autore REMAC Milan
Settore di intervento Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Recepimento e attuazione del diritto
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | misura nazionale di esecuzione | procedura di infrazione (UE)
Riassunto The note provides a simplified and brief explanation of terminology linked with the transposition, implementation and
application of EU law. It also points out the main roles of the EU institutions and Member States during the legislative
procedures leading to adoption of European legislation and a possible infringement procedure.
In sintesi EN
The financing of bank resolution - who should provide the required liquidity?
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data 14-11-2018
Autore esterno Costanza A Russo
Rosa M. Lastra, Queen Mary University of London
Settore di intervento Problemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | impresa in difficoltà | istituto finanziario | norma tecnica |
regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione bancaria dell'UE | vigilanza del
mercato
Riassunto This paper addresses two distinct yet interconnected problems. The first is whether the provision of Emergency
Liquidity Assistance (ELA) on an individual bank basis should be centralised within the European Central Bank (ECB)
and the second is whether existing liquidity financing arrangements are fit for the role. The paper argues that ELA
centralisation would not require Treaty amendment and that a liquidity backstop is needed. However the latter cannot
be provided by the ECB due to the prohibition of monetary financing and other Treaty and EU law requirements.
The choice of the EU entity which should be entrusted with the specific mandate will largely depend on the
characteristics the facility would take. The paper considers such characteristics and analyses which authority may best
fit that role. The paper also suggests that a well-structured facility could have a positive broader macroprudential
impact, and that a fine balance needs to be struck between the risk of moral hazard and the beneficial effect this facility
may have on market confidence.
Analisi approfondita EN
How to provide liquidity to banks after resolution in Europe’s banking union
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data14-11-2018
Autore esterno Maria Demertzis, Inês Gonçalves Raposo, Pia Hüttl, Guntram Wolff (Bruegel)
Settore di interventoProblemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave controllo della liquidità | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | impresa in difficoltà | istituto finanziario |
norma tecnica | regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione bancaria dell'UE
Riassunto Banks deemed to be failing or likely to fail in the banking union are either put into insolvency/liquidation or enter a
resolution scheme to protect the public interest. After resolution but before full market confidence is restored, the
liquidity needs of resolved banks might exceed what can be met through regular monetary policy operations or
emergency liquidity assistance. All liquidity needs that emerge must be met for resolution to be a success. In the euro
area, this can only be done credibly for systemically important banks by the central bank. We discuss how to establish
guarantees against possible losses in order to allow liquidity provisioning in times of resolution.
Analisi approfondita EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 9Establishing the European Defence Fund
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 26-10-2018
Autore KONONENKO Vadim
Settore di intervento Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave bilancio della difesa | competitività | cooperazione tra imprese | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | fondo (UE) | industria
degli armamenti | politica di sicurezza e di difesa comune | politica europea di difesa | ricerca e sviluppo | ricerca
militare | sicurezza europea | spese di difesa
Riassunto One of a number of MFF-related impact assessment reports, this IA provides a comprehensive overview of the
problems facing European defence development, as well as the general objectives that the proposed European
Defence Fund is meant to address. It would nevertheless have gained by including a more detailed explanation behind
the merger of the two financing windows, as well as a more detailed analysis of impacts. Finally, the lack of more
specific objectives appears to have weakened the analysis of monitoring mechanisms and it is unclear how
stakeholders' views have fed into the analysis.
Briefing EN
Abundant Liquidity and Bank Lending Activity: an Assessment of the Risks
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data14-09-2018
Autore esterno Andrew HUGHES HALLETT
Settore di interventoProblemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave banca centrale | controllo della liquidità | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | istituto finanziario |
norma tecnica | politica monetaria | regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione
bancaria dell'UE | zona euro
Riassunto This paper assesses the risks facing the euro area banking system, as it returns to normal financial conditions without
ECB support. In the first part we argue that risks to bank lending mainly stem from the transmission of external
monetary policy effects that may not be aligned with ECB policies. The second part of the paper therefore offers some
ideas on the need to moderate spillover effects from outside monetary policies or events. We also review how far new
prudential policies, regulatory measures and/or policies can be used to mitigate those unfavourable risks.
This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Economic and Monetary Affairs.
Analisi approfondita EN
Excess Liquidity and Bank Lending Risks in the Euro Area
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data14-09-2018
Autore esterno Zsolt DARVAS, David PICHLER
Settore di interventoProblemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave banca centrale | controllo della liquidità | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | gestione del rischio | istituto finanziario |
norma tecnica | politica monetaria | regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | solvibilità finanziaria | Unione
bancaria dell'UE | zona euro
Riassunto Low interest rates and excess liquidity in the euro area, which exceeded €1,900 billion in September 2018, might
create financial stability risks. We clarify the notion of excess liquidity and highlight that its current level is primarily the
result of European Central Bank asset purchases. Overall, we conclude that financial stability risks in the euro area are
low, but increased home bias and housing prices necessitate full attention from macroprudential authorities. Monetary
policy tools are anyway ill-suited to fostering financial stability objectives.
This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee.
Studio EN
Sovereign bond-backed securities: Risk diversification and reduction
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 13-09-2018
Autore DELIVORIAS Angelos
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Problemi economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e
bancarie
Parole chiave Autorità europea degli strumenti finanziari e dei mercati | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | obbligazione | prestito
pubblico | proposta (UE) | regolamentazione finanziaria | rischio finanziario | stabilità finanziaria | vigilanza finanziaria |
zona euro
Riassunto As a part of the European regulatory responses to the financial and sovereign debt crises, the European Commission
has proposed a regulation on sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS), a new class of low-risk securities backed by a
diversified pool of national government bonds. The proposal seeks to provide an enabling framework for a market-led
development of SBBS, thus encouraging banks and investors to diversify their holdings of euro area bonds. The
proposal is meant to address a weakness that appeared during the aforementioned crises, when banks' high exposure
to their sovereigns' own debt, coupled with deteriorating creditworthiness of those sovereigns, led to balance sheet
strains for banks. This in turn put pressure on government budgets, thus creating mutual contagion and financial
instability. The procedure is currently at the initial stage in the European Parliament and the Council. First edition. The
'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 10EU law for an open independent and efficient European administration
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 27-07-2018
Autore EVAS Tatjana
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Petizioni al Parlamento
europeo | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave azione dell'UE | codice di condotta | consultazione pubblica | deontologia professionale | elaborazione del diritto
dell'UE | Europa dei cittadini | governance | istituzione dell'Unione europea
Riassunto The results of the public consultation clearly suggest - EU citizens want action. Citizens call for an action that wold turn
their EU right to good administration into solution. The workable and enforceable solution that adds value. Europe
needs innovation! Innovation not only in tools and technologies but also in how EU governs itself.
Studio EN
Posting of Workers Directive
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 25-07-2018
Autore KISS Monika
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Occupazione |
Politica sociale
Parole chiave condizioni di lavoro | direttiva CE | diritto del lavoro | dumping sociale | elaborazione del diritto dell'UE | lavoro
temporaneo | mobilità della manodopera | politica dell'occupazione dell'UE | retribuzione del lavoro
Riassunto Posting of workers plays an important role in the internal market, particularly in the cross-border provision of services.
While the number of posted workers continues to increase significantly, problems such as unfair practices and unequal
remuneration persist. In addition, the correct balance between the freedom to provide cross-border services and the
social rights of workers is needed, and moreover, needs to be adapted to today's labour market situation. The targeted
revision of the Posting of Workers Directive (96/71/EC) proposed by the Commission intended to bring changes in
three main areas: the remuneration of posted workers (making it equal to that of local workers, even when
subcontracting), more coherent rules on temporary agency workers, as well as long-term posting. The agreement
reached in trilogue negotiations states that long-term posting (with labour law provisions of the host country to be
applied) starts after 12 months (with a possible extension of six months). The overall amount of remuneration received
by a posted worker must meet the level of remuneration in the host Member State (without the reimbursement of the
worker's expenses) which must be published on a single national website. Host Member States can accord to posted
workers the coverage of representative collective agreements in all sectors, and they must protect them against
fraudulent posting. The Parliament approved the text on 29 May 2018, the act was adopted by the Council on 21 June
2018 and the final act was signed on 28 June 2018. Member States have until 30 July 2020 to transpose the measures
of the directive and apply them in their national law. Sixth edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are
updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
General revision of the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure: Achieving greater transparency and
efficiency as of January 2017
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data16-07-2018
AutoreKOTANIDIS Silvia
Settore di interventoDemocrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave commissione PE | competenza del PE | comportamento politico | controllo parlamentare | elaborazione del diritto
dell'UE | emendamento | gruppo politico (PE) | parlamentare europeo | partiti politici | regolamento interno | relazione
interistituzionale (UE) | seduta parlamentare | trasparenza del processo decisionale | voto del parlamento
Riassunto The last general and extensive overhaul of the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, which entered into force as
of 16 January 2017, was intended to bring more transparency and efficiency to parliamentary work. Among the
numerous modifications, may be noted the increased attention to the conduct of Members, the streamlining of the
types of thresholds for procedural requests, the increased transparency surrounding the decision to begin negotiations
during the various stages of the legislative procedure, the abolition of written declarations and the modification of the
maximum number of questions for written answer allowed. These and further modifications required to adapt to the
2016 Interinstititional Agreement on Better Law-making were introduced to bring clarity, incorporate existing practices
and correct redundancies or inconsistencies.
Analisi approfondita DE, EN, FR
13-12-2021 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2021 - PE 11You can also read
