Fantastic beasts and why to conserve them: animals, magic and biodiversity conservation - Cambridge ...

Page created by Sandra Miles
 
CONTINUE READING
Fantastic beasts and why to conserve them: animals,
            magic and biodiversity conservation
                                                    G E O R G E H O L M E S , T H O M A S A N E U R I N S M I T H and C A R O L I N E W A R D

            Abstract There is a broad set of human beliefs, attitudes                                     interactions produce benefits and costs for both biodiversity
            and behaviours around the issue of magical animals, refer-                                    and people. Yet there is an often-overlooked complexity to
            ring to both mythical animals not recognized by science and                                   these cases, with important implications for conservation
            extant animals that are recognized by science but have                                        outcomes. The species involved are either not recognized
            magical properties. This is a broad issue ranging from spir-                                  by science, or the properties of these species that local people
            itual beliefs around mythical animals living in Malagasy for-                                 resent or value are not recognized by science. The Icelandic
            ests, to cultural heritage associated with the Loch Ness                                      protesters were protecting the habitat of Huldufólk, or elves.
            Monster in Scotland. Beliefs and behaviours around magical                                    Ecotourists in Scotland were seeking the Loch Ness Monster
            animals can have positive and negative impacts on biodiver-                                   Nessiteras rhombopteryx. The Ethiopian hyaenas provide
            sity conservation goals. Yet, so far, the discipline of conser-                               the ecosystem service of eating evil spirits. The Malagasy
            vation biology has not adequately considered magical                                          snakes harm humans and cattle by transforming into
            animals, neglecting to account for the broader knowledge                                      sharp spear-like forms and dropping from trees. We argue
            from outside the natural sciences on this issue, and taking                                   that conservationists should take magical animals seriously,
            a narrow, utilitarian approach to how magical animals                                         because they have important positive and negative implica-
            should be managed, without necessarily considering the                                        tions for many species and habitats. Magical animals have
            broader impacts on conservation goals or ethics. Here we                                      been neglected and oversimplified within conservation,
            explore how magical animals can influence conservation                                        probably because of a lack of training in relevant disciplines
            goals, how conservation biology and practice has thought                                      and an overly utilitarian view of human–animal relations,
            about magical animals, and some of the limitations of cur-                                    and this has harmed the ability to conserve species.
            rent approaches, particularly the failure to consider magical                                     We begin with a brief typology of magical and mythical
            animals as part of wider systems of belief and culture. We                                    animals, before outlining the complexities and diversity in
            argue that magical animals and their implications for con-                                    beliefs on magical and mythical animals across the global
            servation merit wider consideration.                                                          South and North. We then explore how magical animals
                                                                                                          affect broader conservation goals, and how they compare
            Keywords Conservation,       ethics,                   Madagascar,            magic,
                                                                                                          to other spiritual and similar issues in conservation,
            snakes, spirituality, Tanzania
                                                                                                          followed by a critique of existing conservation literature
                                                                                                          on magic. Two case studies of magical animals, in
                                                                                                          Madagascar and Tanzania, illustrate in detail some of
            Introduction                                                                                  these trends in two countries with significant conservation
                                                                                                          activity, and the inadequacies of how conservation has ap-
               n  a proposed new highway in Iceland was contested
            I  in court on the basis that it would cross the habitat of a
            valued species (The Guardian, ). In , , tour-
                                                                                                          proached magical animals. We conclude by exploring ways
                                                                                                          to understand the conservation implications of magical
                                                                                                          creatures.
            ists visited a site in Scotland primarily because it is inhabited
            by a rare, endemic animal (ASVA, ), supporting a thriving
            ecotourism industry. Hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Ethiopia
                                                                                                          Magic, animals and contemporary human societies
            are tolerated because they provide vital provisioning ecosys-
            tem services that benefit local communities (Baynes-Rock,                                     Magical animals are complex. They are found worldwide, al-
            ). In Madagascar, in contrast, some snakes are per-                                       though beliefs are locally specific and dynamic. They blur
            secuted because they provide ecosystem disservices, harm-                                     boundaries between magic, spirituality, culture, tradition
            ful to human health (Tingle, ). These are seemingly                                       and politics. We discuss here two kinds of magical animals:
            straightforward conservation stories, where human–animal                                      mythical species not recognized by science, such as the Loch
                                                                                                          Ness Monster and Icelandic elves, and extant-but-magical
            GEORGE HOLMES (Corresponding author) and CAROLINE WARD University of
                                                                                                          species that are recognized by science but have properties
            Leeds, UK. E-mail g.holmes@leeds.ac.uk                                                        that are not, such as spirit-eating in hyaenas, or spear-like
            THOMAS ANEURIN SMITH University of Cardiff, UK                                                behaviours in snakes. This joint focus is justified for three
            Received  December . Revision requested  March .                                   reasons. Firstly, both are associated with protection of spe-
            Accepted  April . First published online  July .                                  cies and habitats in many locations, including in Western/

            This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence
Downloaded(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
               from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP which
                                                         address: 46.4.80.155,
                                                              permits           on 26
                                                                       unrestricted    Sep 2021
                                                                                    re-use,       at 03:46:00,
                                                                                            distribution,      subject to the
                                                                                                          and reproduction    Cambridge
                                                                                                                           in any medium,Core terms
                                                                                                                                          provided theoforiginal
                                                                                                                                                         use, available
                                                                                                                                                                 work is at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
                                                                                                                                                                         properly  cited.
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
            Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
232         G. Holmes et al.

             ‘modern’/‘scientific’ societies and cultures. Secondly, where-                        In Sikkim, India, the Lepcha people have harnessed their
             as zoologists would distinguish between mythical and                                  spiritual worldviews in an ethnic–nationalist project,
             extant-but-magical, local people treat them in very similar,                          (re)constructing their indigenous identity around sacred
             if not identical, ways. From the perspective of studying                              forest and species protection (Arora, ). By laying
             human culture and behaviour, the divisions between when                               claim to sacred spaces and species as being under their
             a creature is regarded as extant, mythical or as heritage can                         care, particular indigenous cultures could gain access to,
             be somewhat artificial. Thirdly, both have been neglected                             and control over, places and resources.
             within mainstream conservation literature. Here we define
             conservation as activities to preserve biological diversity
             and its associated values and services.                                               Magical animals, conservation rationalities and the
                 Concern for magical animals, and a broader assemblage                             conservation of non-magical biodiversity
             between the spiritual and the ecological, is not confined to
             indigenous communities of the global South (Abrahams,                                 For conservationists, interactions between humans and
             ). Societies of the global North remain suffused with                             magical animals can be categorized according to how they
             magic, spiritualism, witchcraft and the occult (Comaroff &                            benefit or harm extant biodiversity, although these categor-
             Comaroff, ). There are degrees by which individuals in                            ies can overlap and interact in complex ways. Firstly, some
             all societies may hold the supposedly dissected worldviews                            species are tolerated or encouraged because of a belief in
             of the scientific and the spiritual, magical or religious, evi-                       their magical properties. In Accra, Ghana, vultures are asso-
             denced by the persistence of the fantastic (including magical                         ciated with magic, and therefore harming them is consid-
             animals) in popular culture (Rountree, ), and in major                            ered to bring bad luck (Campbell, ). This leads to
             and minor religions, cults and witchcrafts (Moore &                                   demonstrable differences in attitudes and behaviours to-
             Sanders, ). Beliefs in magical animals are dynamic,                               wards vultures between those who hold these beliefs, and
             and can transcend from the spiritual or mystical to become                            those who do not. Such beliefs are most likely to be held
             cultural heritage (Comaroff & Comaroff, ), such as the                            by older women, and least likely to be held by younger
             Loch Ness Monster, Welsh dragons and the Beast of                                     men, who tend to have a formal, western-informed educa-
             Bodmin Moor in the UK, trolls in Denmark (Karrebæk &                                  tion, although increasing numbers of scavengers may
             Maegaard, ), and various lake-dwelling monsters across                            strengthen magical beliefs (Campbell, ). The spread
             the globe, including the Kanas Lake Monster in Xinjiang,                              of nationalized formal education, conversion to major reli-
             China, the Seljordsormen in Norway, the Lagarfjót Worm                                gions, and heightened immigration to certain communities
             in Iceland, and the Storsjöodjuret of Sweden (the latter                              have all reduced the efficacy of local worldviews and asso-
             was briefly given protected status by the Swedish                                     ciated magical creatures (Metcalfe et al., ), although
             Environmental Protection Agency but this was later revoked                            witchcraft and spiritualism appear to be rising in modern
             by the Swedish Parliament; Sandelin, ). Alongside these                           Africa (Kohnert, ). The survival of large predators out-
             notable mythical creatures are more general magical asso-                             side protected areas depends on their acceptance or toler-
             ciations with extant species; for example, black cats and                             ance by local communities, forged by place-specific
             magpies (Peltzer, ). Ongoing shifts are partly attribut-                          circumstances in which spiritual beliefs may play a key
             able to syncretic religions appropriating pagan, folk and in-                         part (Pooley et al., ). In Kombolcha, Ethiopia, hyaenas
             digenous worldviews around magical creatures, both                                    are tolerated and encouraged, despite many instances of hy-
             historically in Europe, and ongoing in Africa, India and else-                        aena attacks on humans, particularly children. Hyaenas are
             where (Chandran & Hughes, ; Ormsby & Bhagwat,                                     believed to bring supernatural messages through their
             ; Frascaroli, ). Magical animals can be powerful pol-                         howls, eat evil spirits, and thus protect local people. These
             itical tools in struggles over biodiversity and natural re-                           beliefs coexist alongside recognition of more conventional
             sources, as identity and culture associated with magical                              ecosystem services provided by hyaenas, such as predation
             animals is re-worked as a political project. Icelandic                                on crop-raiding herbivores, and collectively these underpin
             Huldufólk are a synecdoche of the agrarian, rural, traditional                        attitudes towards hyaenas (Baynes-Rock, ). Local beliefs
             past in a country that has transitioned rapidly and relatively                        in the magical properties of hyaenas pre-date Islam, and
             recently into an urban, industrial, globally connected soci-                          survive only because of the incompleteness of people’s con-
             ety; even recent reports of sightings of Huldufólk describe                           version to Islam. In some areas of Brazil, a belief that dol-
             them wearing traditional farming dress rather than modern                             phins can magically transform into people underpins local
             clothing. As such, arguments about defending their habitat                            attitudes and behaviour, and ultimately the conservation of
             can be more about defending ideals of past landscapes and                             dolphins in these places (Alves & Rosa, ), although, as
             traditions, and less about a sincere belief in the existence of                       explored below, closely related beliefs have also led to nega-
             elves (Hafstein, ). Such arguments are particularly                               tive outcomes for dolphins. Magical animals can act as um-
             powerful given the place of Huldufólk in Icelandic culture.                           brella species, whose conservation benefits and protects

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
Animals, magic and conservation                   233

           other species occupying the same habitat, as with the                                 Ormsby & Bhagwat, ). Sacred sites are relatively
           Huldufólk.                                                                            straightforward for conservationists to comprehend: as de-
               In other instances, beliefs in magical animals are inciden-                       fined territories with norms and rules of resource (non) use,
           tal to conservation goals. Some groups in the Serengeti,                              they closely resemble other forms of protected areas and can
           Tanzania, consider certain animals to be sacred totems,                               be included in IUCN definitions and databases of protected
           with spiritual connections to these groups. Hunting of                                areas (Borrini-Feyerabend et al., ). Sacred sites are often
           these animals should follow specific procedures and rituals                           analysed using concepts and approaches typically used for
           to prevent bad luck. Such beliefs prevent some groups from                            understanding protected areas and common pool resources.
           poaching elephants for ivory, but are not sufficiently wide-                          This overlooks the complexities of the spiritual beliefs
           spread to have a significant impact (Kideghesho, ;                                underpinning these areas, their past evolution and possible
           Kaufmann, ). In East Africa, such beliefs have been wea-                          future directions, and implies that such sites owe their exist-
           kened by decades of colonial and postcolonial suppression                             ence to a conservation ethic, not a spiritual one (Salick et al.,
           of traditional spiritual activities, and the spread of                                ; Kibet, ). The literature emphasizes the positive
           Christianity.                                                                         contribution of sacred sites to conservation, rather than
               A belief in the magical properties of animals can impede                          their negative consequences. In contrast, magical animals
           their conservation, and magical animals are sometimes ac-                             are less easy for conservationists to conceptualize using
           tively persecuted, such as aye-ayes Daubentonia madagas-                              dominant conservation concepts. We focus on the positive
           cariensis in Madagascar, and Caribbean owls. Such beliefs                             and negative implications of magical animals for conserva-
           are rarely considered within literature on human–wildlife                             tion, and on the rationalities and beliefs underpinning
           conflict. In other cases, a belief that certain species possess                       human relations with magical animals, in order to under-
           magical properties can lead to unsustainable rates of har-                            stand their dynamics and possible futures.
           vesting (e.g. of dolphins and several species of reptiles in                              Thirdly, there is a smaller body of literature on the impli-
           some areas of Brazil; Alves & Rosa, ; Alves et al.,                               cations of taboos (customary prohibitions on resource use)
           ). Conservationists propose solutions such as captive                             for conservation (Virtanen, ). As with sacred sites, this
           breeding and promotion of alternative, sustainable, magical                           literature understands taboos using institutional approaches
           products. Persecution or harvesting rates of extant-but-                              typically used for conceptualizing common pool resources,
           magical animals may increase with increased access to                                 and tends to assume such resources are protected by a con-
           better technology, or integration of communities into com-                            servation ethic, not a spiritual one (Byers et al., ;
           modity chains (Dickman et al., ). Impediments to con-                             Kideghesho, ). It also focuses on taboos within trad-
           servation can also be less direct; e.g. in some parts of Papua                        itional societies (typically meaning indigenous groups in
           New Guinea, communities argue that some species will                                  the global South), rather than the diversity of societies repre-
           never become extinct because the local people know                                    sented within cases of magical animals. Where this literature
           magic spells to make the species return to that area                                  does consider sacred sites in the global North, it focuses
           (Bastyte et al., ).                                                               largely on forest sites and their past religious significance ra-
               Although magical animals rarely feature in the conserva-                          ther than contemporary society (Chandran & Hughes,
           tion literature, there are other parallel issues that feature                         ; Frascaroli, ). Literature on taboos focuses, by def-
           more prominently. A focus on magical animals both extends                             inition, on instances of non-use of resources, whereas our
           and illuminates problems within this literature. Firstly, there                       focus goes beyond this to include wider relations with
           is research on religion and conservation, such as that asso-                          magical and spiritual aspects of nature, antagonism between
           ciated with the Religion and Conservation Biology Working                             people and nature, and persecution of biodiversity.
           Group of the Society for Conservation Biology. This focuses                               Studying magical animals has the potential to strengthen
           largely on established mainstream religions, and on broad                             and broaden the literature on spiritual aspects of biodiver-
           interactions between environmental ethics and religious be-                           sity conservation, yet several problems regarding how con-
           liefs (e.g. McDaniel, ). Here we focus instead on rela-                           servation has previously conceptualized spirituality and
           tively marginal religious beliefs, on particular species                              magical animals need to be addressed. Firstly, conservation
           rather than broad attitudes, and on instances where spiritual                         is primarily about ‘modifying human actions to minimize
           or magical beliefs have transformed into cultural heritage,                           their negative impacts upon biodiversity’ (St John et al.,
           yet still exert an influence on human behaviour and on con-                           , p. ), yet within conservation, people are mostly re-
           servation outcomes, a blurrier definition of spiritual dimen-                         garded as rational decision makers, or Homo economicus.
           sions of nature.                                                                      This means spiritual and magical beliefs, which are per-
               Secondly, there is substantial work on sacred sites and                           ceived as irrational, are often absent from conservationists’
           other culturally and spiritually protected areas set aside                            understanding of threats to biodiversity, such as human–
           from resource use, which are increasingly recognized for                              wildlife conflict. For example, research on human–predator
           their contribution to conservation (Anthwal et al., ;                             conflicts in the Caribbean (e.g. Turvey et al., ) has

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
234         G. Holmes et al.

             viewed persecution of owls and mongooses through the lens                             of phenomena (Stambach, ). In South Africa and
             of rationality, even though mongoose persecution is an eco-                           Tanzania witchcraft has been recognized by the state
             nomically rational response to predation of chickens,                                 through law, and through state practices that officialize
             whereas owls are persecuted because they are considered                               witch-finding (Kohnert, ; Mesaki, ). Occult prac-
             to be evil spirits in many branches of syncretic vodou                                tices that harness the harmful properties of magical crea-
             (Wiley, ). The natural science bias of conservation                               tures, such as witches using snakes to attack their victims
             often leads to an approach in which emotion is considered                             (Bjerke, ), can have negative effects on the social fabric
             to be anathema to rational decision making (Nelson et al.,                            of local societies (Eves & Forsyth, ).
             ). Secondly, relatively few conservationists have been                                Yet instead of seeing magic and spirituality as part of a
             trained in social science or humanities disciplines that                              broader system, conservation interventions have tended to
             deal with irrational aspects of human beliefs and behaviours,                         pick out individual aspects of beliefs or culture to either
             despite the many calls for an interdisciplinary conservation                          strengthen (if considered pro-conservation) or weaken
             science that values methods and inputs from outside the                               and change (if considered anti-conservation). These sim-
             natural sciences (St John et al., ; Bennett et al., ).                        plistic practices lack attention to local realities, nullifying
             In this context the expanding literature on the environmen-                           the rhetoric behind local and participatory forms of conser-
             tal humanities, rarely explored by conservation, is relevant                          vation (Verschuuren, ; Dudley et al., ). Treating
             (Sörlin, ). Magical animals have been examined by dis-                            spiritual worldviews on magical animals as forms of envir-
             ciplines such as ethnoecology (Alves, ), environmental                            onmental management, without considering the broader
             history (Pooley, ), and social anthropology (e.g. Knight,                         system in which these aspects occur, can cause problems
             ). This literature is too complex to summarize here, but                          and can backfire; for example, attempts to officialize sacred
             it yields detailed, place-based explorations of people and                            landscapes in Australia and Canada for conservation man-
             their relationships with biodiversity, focusing on what                               agement have problematically fixed boundaries around
             makes sense to local people rather than to scientific conser-                         previously fluid sacred areas (Byers et al., ; Schie &
             vationists, keenly attuned to uncovering the often hidden                             Haider, ). Changing values also requires changes in
             details and rationales behind human behaviour through                                 the broader structures and societies in which those values
             qualitative methods such as ethnography.                                              are embedded (Manfredo et al., ). Alternatively, pro-
                 Thirdly, combining the previous two points, with few ex-                          moting or manipulating conservation-friendly spiritual be-
             ceptions (e.g. Dickman et al., ; Aisher & Damodaran,                              liefs can undermine science-based conservation activities
             ; Pooley et al., ) the conservation literature has                            (Dickman et al., ).
             given inadequate treatment to the complex social and cul-                                 Promoting or suppressing individual aspects of beliefs
             tural context, or the ontological system, in which magical                            or culture can have unforeseen long-term consequences
             animals are situated. Conservation may have an overly sim-                            for human well-being and culture as well as biodiversity
             plistic view of how to manage magical beliefs, promoting                              (Dickman et al., ). There is an ethical conundrum in
             those seen as beneficial to conservation and repressing                               conservationists’ utilitarian approach of promoting those
             those that are not (Colding & Folke, ; Kibet, ).                              aspects of culture and belief that benefit conservation
             This utilitarian view isolates beliefs in magical animals                             goals whilst suppressing those that don’t. Conservationists
             from other forms of belief and knowledge, rather than see-                            are fearful of accusations of cultural imperialism when criti-
             ing them as part of a broader, complex, dynamic worldview.                            cizing the spiritual and cultural practices that are harmful to
             For example, the literature on sacred sites and resource ta-                          biodiversity, particularly in the global South (Dickman et al.,
             boos tends to rationalize their protection by local societies                         ). A broader debate on how conservation treats cultural
             either as providers of local ecosystem services (it is rational                       practices is required. The following sections highlight the is-
             to consider spaces as sacred, therefore requiring conserva-                           sues around magical animals in two countries of high con-
             tion, because they provide direct ecosystem service benefits),                        servation value: Madagascar and Tanzania.
             or because worship or persecution of magical creatures plays
             an important role in maintaining the associated social sys-
             tem, the logic being it is rational to promote social integrity                       Madagascar
             around cultural rituals and norms (Anthwal et al., ;
             Rutte, ). This contrasts with the vast humanities litera-                         Beliefs surrounding magical and mythical animals in
             ture exploring societies and their worldviews around magic,                           Madagascar are often interlinked with local fadys, a system
             witchcraft and spiritualities in depth. This complex litera-                          of informal institutions making certain behaviours taboo,
             ture identifies how beliefs in magic are part of broader                              which is a strong part of Malagasy culture. Breaking fadys
             rationalities, and explores their role in social, cultural and pol-                   risks supernatural retribution, affecting individuals or lead-
             itical life. For example, magical animals may be considered                           ing to wider consequences (Scales, ). Fadys can be high-
             alongside scientific explanations in people’s understandings                          ly localized and may differ between neighbouring villages.

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
Animals, magic and conservation                   235

           Many lemur species are believed to be the spirits of                                  are more strictly adhered to than wildlife protection laws,
           Malagasy ancestors, and therefore it is fady to kill these spe-                       they are too heterogeneous between and within communi-
           cies (Jones et al., ). Other species, such as the aye-aye,                        ties to provide any real protection (Golden & Comaroff,
           are associated with negative beliefs. The aye-aye is consid-                          b). The radiated tortoise fady illustrates the dangers of
           ered to be a harbinger of evil, its appearance predicting                             misinterpreting behaviours related to beliefs; local people
           death or sickness in the village. The Malagasy expression                             would not harm tortoises, for fear of spiritual retribution,
           ‘Mangatabmo hita, miseho tsy tsara’ translates as ‘If (the                            but they would not stop outsiders from harming or remov-
           aye-aye) is seen, there will be evil’ (Simons & Meyers,                               ing tortoises ‘since it did not involve anybody bound by a
           ). Another belief is that aye-ayes sneak into houses                              rule that forbade harming the animals’ (Kaufmann, ,
           and use their long middle fingers to murder the sleeping oc-                          p. ). Rapid immigration, economic development, failed
           cupants by puncturing their aortas (Goodman, ). To                                harvests or high levels of poverty and malnutrition may
           prevent bad luck, the aye-aye must be killed and displayed                            weaken adherence to fadys (Jones et al., ; Jenkins
           on roadside poles. On occasions entire villages have been                             et al., ; Kaufmann, ). Concern that fadys may be
           abandoned after an aye-aye sighting (Simons & Meyers,                                 eroding, or do not protect species as hoped, has led to
           ; Goodman, ).                                                                 calls for increased enforcement of wildlife laws (e.g.
               Reptiles are also linked to magical or spiritual beliefs. The                     Jenkins et al., ). However, this highlights a false assump-
           zebu killing snake or fandrefiala (genus Ithycyphus) is be-                           tion that culture remains static throughout time, whereas
           lieved to be able to straighten its body into a spear, dropping                       beliefs may be fluid and can erode, strengthen or evolve
           out of trees and killing people and livestock. Its characteris-                       (Golden & Comaroff, b). Uptake of Western religions,
           tic red tail is said to be caused by bloodstains (Tingle, ).                      such as Christianity, does not appear to have affected belief
               The kalanoro are ‘beneficent spirits that often inhabit                           and adherence to fadys, despite potential conflicts (Golden
           rivers or caves; they tend to be envisioned as women with                             & Comaroff, a).
           very long hair and fingernails who eat crabs, have reversed                               Fadys and other beliefs can also have negative conserva-
           feet (heels in front, toes in the back), and are very short like                      tion impacts. Fady-related killing of aye-ayes is considered a
           dwarves’ (Golden & Comaroff, a, p. ). Belief in their                            key threat to their survival (Andriaholinirina et al., ).
           existence is widespread throughout Madagascar, although                               Negative fadys linked to snakes and chameleons have not
           explanations of their role vary, from kidnapping children,                            been studied in depth, but could also represent a threat to
           luring people into getting lost in the forest, advising on me-                        certain species. In these cases, beliefs are considered to be
           dicinal plants and herbs, or dictating fadys to individuals                           an obstacle to conservation efforts, and education a solution
           through visions or dreams (Hobbs, ; Mattheeuws,                                   to remove these irrational perceptions; for example, Glaw
           ; Golden & Comaroff, b). It is believed the kalanoro                          et al. () in reference to the aye-aye: ‘More efforts to sen-
           disappear from the forest if it is destroyed or degraded                              sitize the natives for the protection. . .would be desirable to
           (Golden & Comaroff, a).                                                           reduce the threatening of this exceptional primate species’.
               Fadys can protect particular species (Lingard et al., ;                       This response contradicts calls to integrate traditional prac-
           Randrianandrianina et al., ), and are often promoted as                           tices and beliefs into conservation, and the ethics of this se-
           exemplifying how conservation can align with tradition, fol-                          lectivity regarding cultural beliefs has been questioned
           lowing calls for integration of traditional knowledge, prac-                          (Dickman et al., ). Keller () stated: ‘If only things
           tices and beliefs within conservation (e.g. Infield &                                 such as fady and ‘sacred forests’ are promoted as valuable
           Mugisha, ). The historically low prevalence of bushmeat                           ‘culture’ in the conservation literature, this may give rise
           hunting in Madagascar, compared to other tropical coun-                               to the suspicion that what we are really dealing with is an
           tries, has been linked to fadys, as fady species are eaten                            unsettling attempt to use ‘culture’ simply in order to better
           less frequently (Jones et al., ; Jenkins et al., ).                           sell to the Malagasy what they might, in fact, not want.’
           Fadys have been promoted to prevent extinction of the
           Critically Endangered radiated tortoise Geochelone radiata
           (Nussbaum & Raxworthy, ). In one conservation pro-                                Tanzania
           ject, villages with strong fadys protecting tortoises were re-
           warded with school buildings, in the hope this would                                  Snakes have symbolic importance across diverse cultures. In
           encourage neighbouring villages to strengthen their cultural                          some, snakes are worshipped and revered, whereas others,
           beliefs (Lingard et al., ; Hudson, ).                                         particularly those influenced by monotheistic religions
               However, an assumption that beliefs are and will always                           such as Christianity, regard snakes as materializations of
           be conservation-friendly risks oversimplification. ‘Malagasy                          Satan (Sunseri, ). Across Africa, snakes are commonly
           taboos are directed at something very different from conser-                          considered to be magical creatures (Bjerke, ; Sunseri,
           vation: namely, at pursuing a structured relationship with                            ). Although literature on sacred sites has supposed con-
           their ancestors’ (Kaufmann, , p. ). Although fadys                             nections between the sanctity of species and habitats and

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
236         G. Holmes et al.

             their ecosystem service benefits for local people (Salick et al.,                     appear as snakes. Intruders from other villages have found
             ; Kibet, ), the snake as a magical creature challenges                        snakes in their pockets during negotiations about forest
             this. Snakes are not easily recognizable to humans as eco-                            ownership, and local trespassers have found snakes on
             logically beneficial, are often regarded as dangerous and,                            their buckets. Pythons are believed to embody the spirits
             as magical creatures, may be regarded as good or evil. In                             of dead chiefs, which are contacted by living chiefs and el-
             East Africa, encounters between snakes and people are com-                            ders concerned about intruders or other wrongdoings.
             mon (Nonga & Haruna, ), and can be dangerous for                                  According to local chiefs, ‘the python is the owner of the
             both sides. Snakebites are an important cause of morbidity                            site. . . the one protecting it. . . people fear that if they clear
             and mortality among rural dwellers (Maregesi et al., ),                           the site, the python will migrate to another area. . . [and] the
             and encounters may cause psychological harm. Yet coexist-                             area will face difficulties with rainfall.’ It is in the interests of
             ence between snakes and people can bring mutual benefits;                             local people to maintain the habitat of the python to keep
             for example, snakes kill unwanted insects and rodents, and                            the spirits of their ancestors accessible to the living chief.
             people may take measures to preserve snake habitats.                                  The python-chief also serves as a conduit to other gods, to
                In Tanzania snakes are worshipped and protected as an-                             pray for rainfall or other matters affecting the village.
             cestral spirits, and persecuted and killed as embodiments of                          However, this constellation of beliefs is under pressure.
             evil and ancillaries to witchcraft killings. The diversity of the                     Politically, chieftainship was abolished by the post-
             magical properties attributed to snakes is partly a result of                         independence government in , and replaced by elected
             Tanzania’s ethnic diversity, with  tribes. Tribes typically                        village officials. Chiefs retain a spiritual role, yet this too is
             have their own languages, sets of worldviews and cultural                             undermined by Christianization and incomers from other
             traditions, and inhabit diverse geophysical, climatic and                             tribes who do not share Nyiha worldviews, a situation com-
             ecological areas (Kideghesho, ); within tribes there is                           mon in western Tanzania (Smith, ).
             further diversity between clans and villages. Despite this di-                            Studies of snakes as magical creatures often follow a utili-
             versity there is some commonality. Many tribes have sacred                            tarian approach, recommending local people should be edu-
             natural sites, typically forests, such that across diverse rural                      cated to learn the importance of snakes for habitats (if
             areas sacred and ritual sites are significant as habitats for                         worldviews regard snakes as evil), or conversely that taboos
             species, including endemic or threatened species (Mgumia                              protecting snakes need to be reinforced and enforced by
             & Oba, ; Smith, ). It is also typical for ethnic/tribal                       some external body, typically the state (Colding & Folke,
             groups to regard species of animals and plants as spiritually                         ; Kideghesho, ). These conceptualizations of
             significant, although there is considerable diversity in these                        snake-protection understand these worldviews as emic
             beliefs (Kideghesho, ).                                                           supernatural beliefs that reinforce taboos, or automatic
                There is limited research on the magical properties of                             sanctions (Colding & Folke, ). For others they are ‘invis-
             snakes in Tanzania and the consequences for conservation.                             ible systems of local resource management’ (Kideghesho,
             In Monduli District, in the north of the country, with a sig-                         ), offering a way in for conservationists to appropriate
             nificant Maasai population, there are reports of frequent                             local worldviews (Kideghesho, ). More in-depth an-
             snake killing because it is believed that snakes are evil and                         thropological and sociological studies recognize that the
             cause misfortune, and they are associated with witchcraft                             meaning and purpose of magical creatures have changed
             (Nonga & Haruna, ). Conversely, for the Zaramo of                                 and are changing. For the Zinza, Bjerke () reported in
             coastal Tanzania, snakes can be the personification of the                            the s that the beneficial beliefs associated with some
             god Koleo, who, in one oral tradition, appears to women                               spirits were rapidly disappearing, such that they were viewed
             as a snake and asks for them to marry him (Sunseri,                                   as demonic beings. A number of studies (e.g. Bjerke, ;
             ). For other ethnic groups in north-western Tanzania,                             Sunseri, ) claim Christianization has contributed to
             species of snakes, including pythons, puff adders, the                                the perception of once benign or beneficial spiritual crea-
             black mamba and cobras, are associated with specific                                  tures as evil, or that Abrahamic traditions have replaced
             clans as their animal symbol, which affords protection                                mystical ties between snakes and sexuality, and fertility
             (Kideghesho, , ). For the Zinza, snakes are both                              and rainfall, with satanic associations.
             ancestor spirits and evil spirits, to be protected or killed ac-                          To suggest that snakes as mystical creatures are of value
             cordingly (Bjerke, ).                                                             to the species conservation ethos is simplistic at best, and
                In  TAS conducted research across six villages in                              contradictory at worst. Studies of traditional knowledge, sa-
             Mbozi District, western Tanzania that were traditionally                              cred natural sites and conservation (Ormsby & Bhagwat,
             those of the Nyiha people, although most are now ethnically                           ; Blicharska & Mikusiński, ) typically ignore the
             plural. Each village has its own sacred natural sites, mostly                         complexities within cultural groups and across diverse
             forests, containing the burial grounds of previous chiefs.                            groups within states. In the case of the Nyiha in Mbozi, sug-
             The living chief (abamwene) and his assistants have powers                            gestions by some that traditional institutions, in this case
             to contact ancestral spirits inhabiting forests, who often                            local chiefs, should be empowered to enforce local

                                                                                        Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
Animals, magic and conservation                    237

           regulations (Kideghesho, ) are politically sensitive                              create successful coexistence between humans and
           given that the state has deliberately shifted power away                              non-humans.
           from hereditary chiefs to democratically elected village gov-
           ernments. To give chiefs official spiritual authority would
           undoubtedly anger those who do not adhere to traditional                              Acknowledgements
           worldviews, and giving them powers over forest protection
           would undermine local village governments. Snakes are am-                             We thank Guðni Th. Jóhannesson and Alaric Hall for their
           biguous and complex magical creatures, both good and evil                             insights into Huldufólk and Icelandic culture and politics,
           in various geographical, ethnic and spiritual contexts, and to                        and William Andindilile for his assistance with fieldwork
           entangle them with existing conservation management                                   in Tanzania. CW’s contribution was supported by the
           would be equally complex.                                                             Natural Environment Research Council.

           Conclusions                                                                           Author contributions

           We have illustrated that magical animals can have positive                            The research was conceived by GH. GH and TAS led the
           and negative consequences for conservation, and that the re-                          writing of the main sections of the article. TAS wrote the
           lationship between magical animals, human beliefs and be-                             Tanzania section, CW the Madagascar section. All authors
           haviour, and extant biodiversity is complex. We have also                             contributed to refining and editing the text.
           shown that current views of magical animals within conser-
           vation are inadequate. Beliefs in magical animals are often
           ignored, and when acknowledged they are often treated as                              References
           isolated issues to be tackled individually based on their dir-
           ect impact on conservation goals, rather than considered as                           A B R A H A M S , R.G. (ed.) () Witchcraft in Contemporary Tanzania.
                                                                                                     Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
           part of a complex system or worldview. In response, we
                                                                                                 A I S H E R , A. & D A M O D A R A N , V. () Introduction: human–nature
           argue that conservation needs to interrogate the interaction                              interactions through a multispecies lens. Conservation & Society, ,
           of magical animals, extant animals and biodiversity conser-                               –.
           vation goals. It should consider the breadth of magical ani-                          A LV E S , R.R. () Relationships between fauna and people and the
           mals, from those that are mainly spiritual to those such as                               role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiology and
                                                                                                     Conservation, , –.
           the Huldufólk or Loch Ness Monster, which are becoming,
                                                                                                 A LV E S , R.R., N E T O , N.A.L., S A N T A N A , G.G., V I E I R A , W.L. &
           or have become, more political or cultural in nature, recog-                              A L M E I D A , W.O. () Reptiles used for medicinal and magic
           nizing the blurred boundaries around such categories. It                                  religious purposes in Brazil. Applied Herpetology, , –.
           should see these animals as part of broader systems, be it                            A LV E S , R.R. & R O S A , I.L. () Use of tucuxi dolphin Sotalia
           of cultures, rationalities or belief systems, and acknowledge                             fluviatilis for medicinal and magic/religious purposes in north of
           that beliefs and values around magical animals are dynamic.                               Brazil. Human Ecology, , –.
                                                                                                 A N D R I A H O L I N I R I N A , N., B A D E N , A., B L A N C O , M., C H I K H I , L.,
           Such an endeavour would require disciplines beyond nat-                                   C O O K E , A., D AV I E S , N. et al. () Daubentonia madagascariensis.
           ural sciences, including anthropology, ethnozoology, his-                                 In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species : e.TA.
           tory, theology and others. It would require scientifically                                Http://dx.doi.org/./IUCN.UK.-.RLTS.TA.
           trained conservationists to engage with new methodologies,                                en [accessed  June ].
           particularly those involving long-term studies and qualita-                           A N T H WA L , A., G U P TA , N., S H A R M A , A., A N T H WA L , S. & K I M , K.-H.
                                                                                                     () Conserving biodiversity though traditional beliefs in sacred
           tive data, which generate locally specific understandings ra-                             groves in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Resources, Conservation
           ther than universal theories, and that embrace human                                      and Recycling, , –.
           irrationality. Here approaches such as multispecies ethnog-                           A R O R A , V. () The forest of symbols embodied in the Tholung
           raphy, which studies the entanglements of human and non-                                  sacred landscape of North Sikkim, India. Conservation & Society, ,
           human life, could be useful. Multispecies ethnography can                                 –.
                                                                                                 ASVA (A S S O C I AT I O N O F S C OT T I S H V I S I T O R A T T R AC T I O N S ) ()
           combine ethological studies of animal behaviour with
                                                                                                     Visitor Trends Report. ASVA, Edinburgh, UK.
           ethnographic studies of human behaviour, values, culture                              B A S T Y T E , D., F O X , J.C. & A N T H O N Y , B.P. () Assessing the
           and beliefs, combining the material and the social, often                                 importance of local biodiversity to communities in Madang
           grounded in locally specific human–animal relations                                       province, Papua New Guinea. In Native Forest Management in
           (Aisher & Damodaran, ; Pooley et al., ). As such,                                 Papua New Guinea: Advances in Assessment, Modelling and
                                                                                                     Decision-Making (eds J.C. Fox, R.J. Keenan, C.L. Brack & S. Saulei),
           it is well placed to understand the complexities of interactions
                                                                                                     pp. –. ACIAR Proceedings No. . Australian Centre for
           between humans, extant and magical biodiversity (e.g.                                     International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia.
           Baynes-Rock, ). Ultimately, by understanding human                                B AY N E S -R O C K , M. () Local tolerance of hyena attacks in East
           interactions with magical animals, conservation could                                     Hararge Region, Ethiopia. Anthrozoös, , –.

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
238         G. Holmes et al.

             B E N N E T T , N.J., R O T H , R., K L A I N , S.C., C H A N , K.M.A., C L A R K , D.A.,            Cultural and Ethical Values into Conservation. Fauna & Flora
                 C U L L M A N , G. et al. () Mainstreaming the social sciences in                            International, Cambridge, UK.
                 conservation. Conservation Biology, , –.                                               J E N K I N S , R.K., K E A N E , A., R A KO T O A R I V E LO , A.R.,
             B J E R K E , S. () The high god among the Zinza of northwestern                                 R A KOT O M B O AV O N J Y , V., R A N D R I A N A N D R I A N I N A , F.H.,
                 Tanzania. Numen, , –.                                                                    R A Z A F I M A N A H A K A , H.J. et al. () Analysis of patterns of
             B L I C H A R S K A , M. & M I K U S I Ń S K I , G. () Incorporating social and                  bushmeat consumption reveals extensive exploitation of protected
                 cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy.                                 species in eastern Madagascar. PLoS ONE, (), e.
                 Conservation Biology, , –.                                                         J O N E S , J.P., A N D R I A M A R O V O LO LO N A , M.M. & H O C K L E Y , N. ()
             B O R R I N I -F E Y E R A B E N D , G., K OT H A R I , A. & O V I E D O , G. ()                 The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in
                 Indigenous and Local Communities and Protected Areas: Towards                                    Madagascar. Conservation Biology, , –.
                 Equity and Enhanced Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and                              K A R R E B Æ K , M.S. & M A E G A A R D , M. () Pigs, herring and
                 Cambridge, UK.                                                                                   Bornholm on a table: a high-end restaurant’s construction of
             B Y E R S , B.A., C U N L I F F E , R.N. & H U D A K , A.T. () Linking the                       authenticity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, Tilburg University,
                 conservation of culture and nature: a case study of sacred forests in                            Tilburg, Netherlands.
                 Zimbabwe. Human Ecology, , –.                                                        K A U F M A N N , J.C. () Contrasting visions of nature and landscapes.
             C A M P B E L L , M. () Factors for the presence of avian scavengers in                          In Conservation and Environmental Management in Madagascar
                 Accra and Kumasi, Ghana. Area, , –.                                                      (ed. I.R. Scales), pp. –. Routledge, London, UK.
             C H A N D R A N , M.D.S. & H U G H E S , J.D. () Sacred groves and                           K E L L E R , E. () The danger of misunderstanding ‘culture’.
                 conservation: the comparative history of traditional reserves in the                             Madagascar Conservation & Development, , –.
                 Mediterranean area and in south India. Environment and History, ,                           K I B E T , S. () Plant communities, species diversity, richness, and
                 –.                                                                                         regeneration of a traditionally managed coastal forest, Kenya. Forest
             C O L D I N G , J. & F O L K E , C. () Social taboos: ‘invisible’ systems of                     Ecology and Management, , –.
                 local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological                            K I D E G H E S H O , J.R. () Co-existence between the traditional
                 Applications, , –.                                                                       societies and wildlife in western Serengeti, Tanzania: its relevancy in
             C O M A R O F F , J. & C O M A R O F F , J.L. () Occult economies and the                        contemporary wildlife conservation efforts. Biodiversity and
                 violence of abstraction: notes from the South African postcolony.                                Conservation, , –.
                 American Ethnologist, , –.                                                           K I D E G H E S H O , J.R. () The potentials of traditional African cultural
             D I C K M A N , A., J O H N S O N , P.J., VA N K E S T E R E N , F. & M AC D O N A L D , D.W.        practices in mitigating overexploitation of wildlife species and
                 () The moral basis for conservation: how is it affected by                                   habitat loss: experience of Tanzania. International Journal of
                 culture? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, , –.                                  Biodiversity Science & Management, , –.
             D U D L E Y , N., H I G G I N S -Z O G I B , L. & M A N S O U R I A N , S. () The links      K N I G H T , J. (ed.) () Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in
                 between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites.                                       Anthropological Perspective. Routledge, London, UK.
                 Conservation Biology, , –.                                                           K O H N E R T , D. () Witchcraft and transnational social spaces:
             E V E S , R. & F O R S Y T H , M. () Developing insecurity: sorcery,                             witchcraft violence, reconciliation and development in South
                 witchcraft and Melanesian economic development. State, Society                                   Africa’s transition process. The Journal of Modern African Studies,
                 and Governance in Melanesia Discussion Paper, Australian                                         , –.
                 National University, Canberra, Australia.                                                    L I N G A R D , M., R A H A R I S O N , N., R A B A KO N A N D R I A N I N A , E.,
             F R A S C A R O L I , F. () Catholicism and conservation: the potential of                       R A KOT O A R I S OA , J.A. & E L M Q V I S T , T. () The role of local
                 sacred natural sites for biodiversity management in central Italy.                               taboos in conservation and management of species: the radiated
                 Human Ecology, , –.                                                                      tortoise in southern Madagascar. Conservation & Society, , –.
             G L AW , F., V E N C E S , M. & R A N D R I A N I A N I A , R.D. () Killed aye-aye           M A N F R E D O , M.J., T E E L , T.L. & D I E T S C H , A.M. () Implications of
                 (Daubentonia madagascariensis) exposed on the gallows in                                         human value shift and persistence for biodiversity conservation.
                 northeastern Madagascar. Lemur News, , –.                                                    Conservation Biology, , −.
             G O L D E N , C.D. & C O M A R O F F , J. (a) Effects of social change on                    M A R E G E S I , S., K A G A S H E , G. & M A S AT U , K. ()
                 wildlife consumption taboos in northeastern Madagascar. Ecology                                  Ethnopharmacological survey of snake bite treatment in Ukerewe
                 and Society, , http://dx.doi.org/./ES--.                                      Island, Tanzania. Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy, ,
             G O L D E N , C.D. & C O M A R O F F , J. (b) The human health and                               −.
                 conservation relevance of food taboos in northeastern                                        M AT T H E E U W S , C. () Towards an anthropology in life: the
                 Madagascar. Ecology and Society, , http://dx.doi.org/./                                  astrological architecture of Zanadroandrena Land, West
                 ES--.                                                                                 Bezanozano, Central East Madagascar. PhD thesis. University of
             G O O D M A N , S.M. () Remains of an aye-aye (Daubentonia                                       Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
                 madagascariensis) at the edge of the Parc National d’Ankarana,                               M C D A N I E L , J. () Spirituality and sustainability. Conservation
                 Région Diana. Malagasy Nature, , –.                                                       Biology, , –.
             H A F S T E I N , V.T. () The elves’ point of view: cultural identity in                     M E S A K I , S. () Witchcraft and the law in Tanzania. International
                 contemporary Icelandic elf-tradition. Fabula, , .                                            Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, , –.
             H O B B S , J.J. () People and caves in Madagascar. Focus on                                 M E T C A L F E , K., F F R E N C H -C O N S TA N T , R. & G O R D O N , I. () Sacred
                 Geography, , –.                                                                              sites as hotspots for biodiversity: the Three Sisters Cave complex in
             H U D S O N , R. () Troubled times for the radiated tortoise                                     coastal Kenya. Oryx, , –.
                 (Astrochelys radiata). In Turtles on the Brink in Madagascar:                                M G U M I A , F.H. & O B A , G. () Potential role of sacred groves in
                 Proceedings of Two Workshops on the Status, Conservation, and                                    biodiversity conservation in Tanzania. Environmental Conservation,
                 Biology of Malagasy Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles. Chelonian                                  , −.
                 Research Monographs, , –.                                                               M O O R E , H.L. & S A N D E R S , T. (eds) () Magical Interpretations,
             I N F I E L D , M. & M U G I S H A , A. () Culture, Values and Conservation:                     Material Realities: Modernity, Witchcraft and the Occult in
                 A Review of Perspectives, Policies and Practices for the Integration of                          Postcolonial Africa. Routledge, London, UK.

                                                                                                   Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
Animals, magic and conservation                       239

           N E L S O N , M.P., B R U S KO T T E R , J.T., V U C E T I C H , J.A. & C H A P R O N , G.           S Ö R L I N , S. () Environmental humanities: why should biologists
               () Emotions and the ethics of consequence in conservation                                        interested in the environment take the humanities seriously?
               decisions: lessons from Cecil the Lion. Conservation Letters, ,                                     BioScience, , –.
               –.                                                                                         S TA M B AC H , A. () The rationality debate revisited. Reviews in
           N O N G A , H.E. & H A R U N A , A. () Assessment of human–snake                                     Anthropology, , –.
               interaction and its outcomes in Monduli District, northern                                       S T J O H N , F.A., K E A N E , A.M. & M I L N E R ‐G U L L A N D , E.J. ()
               Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, , –.                                             Effective conservation depends upon understanding human
           N U S S B A U M , R.A. & R A X W O R T H Y , C.J. () Commentary on                                   behaviour. In Key Topics in Conservation Biology  (eds D.
               conservation of ‘Sokatra’ the radiated tortoise (Geochelone radiata)                                 W. Macdonald & K.J. Willis), pp. –. John Wiley & Sons,
               of Madagascar. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, , –.                                          Oxford, UK.
           O R M S B Y , A.A. & B H A G WA T , S.A. () Sacred forests of India: a                           S U N S E R I , T. () Majimaji and the Millennium: Abrahamic sources
               strong tradition of community-based natural resource management.                                     and the creation of a Tanzanian resistance tradition. History in
               Environmental Conservation, , –.                                                             Africa, , –.
           P E LT Z E R , K. () Magical thinking and paranormal beliefs among                               T H E G U A R D I A N () Elf lobby blocks Iceland road project. Https://
               secondary and university students in South Africa. Personality and                                   www.theguardian.com/world//dec//elf-lobby-iceland-
               Individual Differences, , –.                                                               road-project [accessed  May ].
           P O O L E Y , S. () A cultural herpetology of Nile crocodiles in Africa.                         T I N G L E , J. () Snakes in Madagascar’s folklore. Https://jleetingle.
               Conservation & Society, , –.                                                                 wordpress.com////snakes-in-madagascars-folklore/
           P O O L E Y , S., B A R U A , M., B E I N A R T , W., D I C K M A N , A., H O L M E S , G.,              [accessed  March ].
               L O R I M E R , J. et al. (). An interdisciplinary review of current and                     T U R V E Y , S.T., F E R N Á N D E Z -S E C A D E S , C., N U Ñ E Z -M I Ñ O , J.M., H A R T ,
               future approaches to improving human–predator relations.                                             T., M A R T I N E Z , P., B R O C C A , J.L. & Y O U N G , R.P. () Is local
               Conservation Biology, , –.                                                                   ecological knowledge a useful conservation tool for small mammals
           R A N D R I A N A N D R I A N I N A , F.H., R AC E Y , P.A. & J E N K I N S , R.K.B. ()              in a Caribbean multicultural landscape? Biological Conservation,
               Hunting and consumption of mammals and birds by people in                                            , –.
               urban areas of western Madagascar. Oryx, , –.                                            V E R S C H U U R E N , B. () An overview of cultural and spiritual values
           R O U N T R E E , K. () How magic works: New Zealand feminist                                        in ecosystem management and conservation strategies. In
               witches’ theories of ritual action. Anthropology of Consciousness, ,                               International Conference on Endogenous Development and
               –.                                                                                               Biocultural Diversity, October , Geneva, Switzerland.
           R U T T E , C. () The sacred commons: conflicts and solutions of                                 V I R T A N E N , P. () The role of customary institutions in the
               resource management in sacred natural sites. Biological                                              conservation of biodiversity: sacred forests in Mozambique.
               Conservation, , –.                                                                        Environmental Values, , –.
           S A L I C K , J., A M E N D , A., A N D E R S O N , D., H O F F M E I S T E R , K., G U N N , B. &   W I L E Y , J.W. () Status and conservation of forest raptors in the
               Z H E N D O N G , F. () Tibetan sacred sites conserve old growth trees                           West Indies. ICBP Technical Publication, , –.
               and cover in the eastern Himalayas. Biodiversity and Conservation,
               , –.
           S A N D E L I N , E. () Eating E.T. In Exploring Human–Animal
               Relations in Science, Society and Culture (eds E. Andersson                                      Biographical sketches
               Cederholm, A. Björck, K. Jennbert & A-S. Lönngren), pp. –. The
               Pufendorf Institute of Advanced Studies, Lund University, Lund,                                  GE O R G E HO L M E S ’s research focuses primarily on the interaction of
               Sweden.                                                                                          protected areas and local communities, particularly contests over the
           S C A L E S , I.R. () Lost in translation: conflicting views of                                  social impacts of conservation, and on the political economy of conser-
               deforestation, land use and identity in western Madagascar. The                                  vation, including private protected areas. He has conducted extended
               Geographical Journal, , –.                                                                fieldwork in the Dominican Republic and Chile. TO M SM I T H ’ s re-
           S C H I E , R.V. & H A I D E R , W. () Indigenous-based approaches to                            search has included work on environmental education and young peo-
               territorial conservation: a case study of the Algonquin Nation of                                ple’s involvement in conservation in Tanzania and the UK, spiritual
               Wolf Lake. Conservation & Society, , –.                                                    beliefs and witchcraft in conservation, abstract notions of environmen-
           S I M O N S , E.L. & M E Y E R S , D.M. () Folklore and beliefs about the                        tal value, and urban housing in Kenya. He has also conducted research
               aye aye (Daubentonia madagascariensis). Lemur News, , .                                     in the UK on technology and roaming in national parks. CA R O L I N E
           S M I T H , T.A. () Witchcraft, spiritual worldviews and                                         WA R D is conducting research into changes in protected area govern-
               environmental management: rationality and assemblage.                                            ance in Madagascar, and their interaction with ecosystem services and
               Environment and Planning A, , –.                                                         local livelihoods.

           Oryx, 2018, 52(2), 231–239 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700059X
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 26 Sep 2021 at 03:46:00, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700059X
You can also read