FASTRACK TO SHAREPOINT - A VISION FOR USING SHAREPOINT AND DOCUMENTUM

 
CONTINUE READING
FASTRACK TO SHAREPOINT - A VISION FOR USING SHAREPOINT AND DOCUMENTUM
FasTrack to SharePoint

A Vision for Using SharePoint and
          Documentum
FASTRACK TO SHAREPOINT - A VISION FOR USING SHAREPOINT AND DOCUMENTUM
Disclaimers – I am NOT…
• An IT Guy

• A SharePoint Guru
A little bit about RTD
• Mission Statement – To     • At RTD we:
  meet our constituents’     •   Serve 8 counties
                             •   Governed by a 15 member, publicly
  present and future             elected Board of Directors
  public transit needs by    •   Cover 2,337 square miles
  offering safe, clean,      •   Employ 2,500+ people
                             •   Have over 300,000+ boardings a day
  reliable,
    li bl courteous,
                t                on over 170 lines
  accessible and cost‐       •   Service by RTD and contracted out
  effective service          •   Salaried and union employees
                                                       p y

  throughout the District.
A Little More….
• Organizational Structure • Records Management
  – General Manager             falls under IT
  – 9 Departments with          Department within
    Assistant GM’s              Administration
    overseeing them
                              • Fall under the Colorado
  – New GM has reorganized
                                State Archivist for
    the departments and
    filled the “Acting” roles   direction and guidance
                                on our program
Where we are now
• We had a retention           • We are bound to local,
  schedule, last updated in      state and federal
  2002 – department              regulations
  based. Revised and           • IGA’s and ggrant
  approved d last
             l fall
                  f ll           requirements
• Legal had been working       • No formal records
  on revisingg to match the      training done, ever
  Colorado Special Districts   • Strong support from legal
  schedules                      and Senior Leadership
• Records warehouse              team
                                 team.
  closed at one point by the   • A little bit of records
  fire marshal                   NIMBY
Where we are now
• A lot,, a lot of change
                       g      • The ggood news is the
   – New ERP system             managers and
   – New Accounting system      employees at RTD want
   – Retirements/leaving
                /        of     to do the right thing
                                                thing.
     key personnel            • We have a formal
   – Recession and fundingg     records repository – it
     issues                     looks like this….
• From one senior
  manager “We’re going
  manager:
  through technological
  burnout.”
Our Current Repository
Our Current Repository
• Basically used as        • Some departments use
  another shared drive       it very effectively
• Implementation
     p              done   • Some,, not so much
  well, went through       • Poor & inconsistent
  several managers with      metadata (if any)y
  different views on       • Non‐record material in
  permissions, settings,     the repository
  use
                           • Crazy level file
                             structures
Getting It Fixed
•   Gettingg buy‐in
                y from Senior Leadership
                                       p
•   Retention Schedule updated and approved
•   Developing Records Procedures
•   Developing Relationships
•   Still to do…
    – Develop Training – Strategic and Technical
    – Records Inventory – As we meet with departments,
      adjust
        j the retention schedule
    – Document and automate workflows
    – Implement New Repository – The Right Way!
We’ve
We ve got to be flexible
ECM – The Grand Vision
• Everybody working in one unified system (in theory)
• One source for records and information (more
  theory)y)
• Applications sitting on top of Documentum or
  pullingg information from it (better theory)
  p                                             y
• All of this is great in theory, difficult in application
   – Home grown “quick fix databases” hard to get rid of
   – Integration is very difficult
   – Underestimated resources needed
RTD Base                                     Accounts
                               Engineering                    Operations                                   Payable

                                  McLaren                       SharePoint 2010                                   Oracle
                             Enterprise Engineer                                                                   ERM
                                              Transmittal          Collaboration                      Solicitations          Contract
                                             & Submittals
                          Drawings                                                                       Portal            Administration
                                                Portal          Search and Retrieval

                                                                     Workflow
                           Engineering             Change                                               Claims               Invoices
                            Documents               Orders    Shared Drive Replacement

                                                                  Tribal Knowledge                                Workflow
                                     Workflow

                SaaS Applications
                                                                                                            Oracle
     Law            Construction           DBE/SBE                                                      Repository
Enforcement ‐       Management ‐         Management ‐
     TBD              Aconex                 TBD                                         Records
                                                             Documentum                  Management
                                                             Content Server
                                                                                                                      WebTop
        Archive
  Services for Email /
                                                                                                            Records Retention
                                                                                                                Manager
                                                                     ECIS
          Email                                                                          Legal
          Store                                Laserfiche       Federated search
Why SharePoint and Documentum
• Time, effort and money spent on developing
  Documentum
• Replacement for eRoom
• Cost
  C t effective
         ff ti solution
                   l ti
• Is SharePoint robust enough on it’s own?
• Lots off opportunities ffor enhancements
                                h
• Shared drive replacement
Why SharePoint and Documentum
• Integration with Office 2010 (and Communicator?)
• Consistent
       i     interface
             i    f
• Begin developing social media aspects
   •   Tagging
   •   Blogs
   •   Wikis
   •   Skillset knowledge
• Search and retrieve across multiple repositories
• Workflow and repository replacement for Outlook
Why SharePoint and Documentum
• Minimize the need for “new programs/software”
• Empower iinformation
                f      i workers
                              k ((within
                                   i hi some
  boundaries)
• Free
  F    up IT tto workk on other
                           th projects
                                 j t
Where do we go from here?
• Think long term – strategic management of our
  information assets
• Development of governance policies for SharePoint
• Get
  G t peoplel to
               t understand
                    d t d th  the reality
                                     lit off what
                                              h t th
                                                  they
  are asking for and what it means to them
• Expect to need consultant help to set up
• Expect to need additional software tools
• Expect
  E     t resistance
             it      tto change
                          h     – “We’ve
                                  “W ’ never done
                                                d      it
  that way before…”
Where do we go from here?
• Train Train Train – Individuals, groups, management,
  staff consistently and regularly
  staff,

• Create and
           d understand
               d      d workflows,
                           kfl     questioning
  everything
Cool Stuff/Competing Projects
              •   CAD/AVL System
              •   Smart Cards
              •   PIDS Displays
              •   Farebox Upgrades
              •   Transit Signal Priority
              •   SaaS Initiatives
                  – Construction Management
                  – Law Enforcement
                  – SBE/DBE
                       /    Trackingg
What do I (You) need to do to keep up?
• Professional training
• Know your industry
• Network with your peers
   – Twitter
   – Linked In
   – Facebook???
• Follow blogs – professional
  and industry
Questions?
   • Thank
       a You,
           ou, Thank
                 a you very
                        e y much…
                             uc

   Brian Starck,, CRM
   bkstarck@gmail.com
   Cell: 720.253.3662
   Work: 303.299.2177
   Twitter: @bkstarck
   Linked In: linkedin.com.in/brianstarck
You can also read