Global Macroeconomic Outlook and the Brazilian Elections - Paulo Leme 39º Convención del IAEF

Page created by Ramon Warner
 
CONTINUE READING
Global Macroeconomic Outlook
  and the Brazilian Elections

          Paulo Leme
     39º Convención del IAEF
    Mendoza, September 7, 2018
Global Economy – Strong Growth and Low Inflation

• Global macro conditions: as good as it gets
• Global growth peaked to 4.1% in 1Q18, slowing to 4% in 2Q18 - 3Q18; and 3.8% in
  2019
• Inflation rose from 1.7% in 2017 to 2.2% in 2018, stabilizing at that level in 2019
• Regional disparities: US economy (2.9%) accelerating and growing faster than EU
  (2.2%) and Japan (1.0%) in 2018
• China: growth slowing from 6.9% in 2017 to 6.6% in 2018 and 6.4% in 2019
• Risks: tilted to the downside (trade war, tighter financial conditions, valuations and
  financial market risks, completion of Brexit in March 2019)
• US watch: effect of mid-term election in November on the Trump administration

                                                                                           2
US Elections: DEMs Take House REPs Keep Senate

         Source: Goldman Sachs Investment Research

                                                     3
A Positive Short Term Outlook for Commodities

Commodity                      Current               3m   6m    12m

WTI                                 69.80          74.50 69.50 69.50
LME Aluminium                        2,125          2,300 2,200 2,000
LME Copper                          5,975          6,500 7,000 7,667
Comex Gold                          1,207          1,375 1,375 1,450
CBOT Soy                              844            900   950   975
CBOT Wheat                            545            500   500   475

Source: Goldman Sachs Investment Research and Bloomberg

                                                                        4
Central Banks Tightening Financial Conditions
• Gradual tightening of global financial conditions led by the US
• Significant increase in the “risk free rate” of return, favoring capital inflows toward the US
• Fed - 2 more hikes of 25 bp in 2018 (September and December), raising Fed Funds’ range
  to 2.25% - 2.50% by December
• For 2019, FOMC likely to raise Fed Funds 4 x 25 bp to 3.25% - 3.50% by December 2019
• US Treasury Yield curve – upward-parallel shift more likely than inversion
• Risk– Fed being late at raising interest rates, given tight output gap, record-low
  unemployment and more fiscal stimulus
• ECB – no rate hikes in 2018 and 2019; first hike only in 2020
• EM - with currencies being under pressure, several EM central banks are also tightening
  monetary policy

                                                                                                   5
US Yield Curve in the Last 3 Months

     Source: Goldman Sachs Investment Research

                                                 6
FX – Strong USD; EM Currencies Under Pressure
• USD - while the bulk of its appreciation is behind us, fundamentals still favor a
  slightly stronger USD
• US intervention in FX markets: unlikely and ineffective
• EUR is likely to continue to struggle in the near term because:
(a) tighter financial conditions and stronger relative cyclical position in favor of the
    USD x EUR
(b) in Europe, political and fiscal risks (Italy) can weigh against the EUR
• EM FX: prone to high volatility and weakening due to trade war and mild contagion
  from riskier countries (TRL, ZAR, BRL, ARS)
• The more Fed tightens, the larger is the risk for capital outflows in EM
• CNY – could weaken slightly to 7.10 in 6 months, stabilizing thereafter

                                                                                           7
US Dollar Rally vs. CNY Depreciation

       Source: Goldman Sachs Investment Research

                                                   8
Flow of Funds: Out of EM and Europe into US
• In the year through August, EM equity funds received net inflows of US$15bn;
  EM bond funds experienced net outflows of US$1.5bn
• In August, EM funds experienced outflows
• European equities and bonds experienced outflows
• Funds have moved to US bonds (net inflows of US$77bn YTD); US Money
  Markets; and US equities (+US$5.4 bn YTD)
• For global markets, net inflows for equities and bonds amounted to US$116bn and
  US$68bn YTD
• Global high yield funds experienced net outflows of US$46bn YTD
• Investors’ challenge: valuations and taking higher risks to receive lower returns

                                                                                      9
Valuation – Low Risk Premia Across US Asset Classes

        Source: Goldman Sachs Investment Research

                                                      10
Asset Allocation – Biased Toward US Equities
• Equities - despite high valuations, earnings and growth can support slight increases in
  P/Es, raising the S&P moderately
• EM equities – the sell off offers interesting valuations for this asset class, particularly for
  MSCI Asia Pacific ex-Japan
• US Treasury yield curve: a parallel shift is more likely than a bear flattener/inversion of
  UST curve
• Yield curve puzzle: little inflation, term, and fiscal risk premium in the back- end of the
  curve
• Credit – the most vulnerable asset class to higher UST rates
• US Investment Grade is in a stronger position than US High Yield
• EM Sovereigns and Corporates – bond yields are likely to continue to widen in the
  short run
• FX – long USD; short CNY; EM currencies undervalued (ARS, BRL, TRL, MXN)

                                                                                                    11
Brazil – Next President will Face Difficult Macro Situation
• The Brazilian economy has 4 areas of strength:
-   inflation: IPCA-15 index (4.3% yoy) remains close to the target
-   strong external position: current account deficit is only US$20 bn (1% of GDP) and
          international reserves are US$380 billion
-   growth: after a deep recession, real GDP growth recovered to a modest 1% in 2018
-   banking system: solid, with strong regulatory and prudential frameworks
• Brazil faces 5 major challenges:
-   fiscal solvency – high stock of domestic public debt (88% of GDP); primary fiscal deficit of 2.4% of
           GDP; some regional governments are insolvent
-   total factor productivity is very low (0.5%), limiting potential real GDP to 1.5%-2.0%
-   savings and investments are too low to generate growth (16.4% and 16.0% of GDP)
-   unemployment is high (12.3%)
-   infrastructure has depreciated and public services (health, education, security) are precarious

                                                                                                           12
Brazil – Selected Economic Indicators
                                  2016    2017   2018 F    2019 F
Real GDP (% change)               -3.5    1.0     1.0      2.0
Unemployment (%)                  12.0   12.6    12.3     12.0
Exchange Rate (BRL/USD eop)       3.25   3.31    4.25     4.50
IPCA Inflation Rate (% yoy)       6.29   4.00    4.25     4.50
Primary Fiscal Balance (% GDP)    -2.5   -1.7    -2.4     -2.2
Nominal Fiscal Balance (% GDP)    -8.9   -7.8    -6.5     -6.6
Gross Public Debt (% GDP, IMF)    78.4   84.0    88.2     90.5
Trade balance (US$ bn)             48     67      50       30
Current account (US$ bn)           -24    -10     -20      -45
Current account (% GDP)           -1.3   -0.5    -1.0     -1.7
International Reserves (US$ bn)   365    374     380       370
Gross External Debt (% GDP)       37.2   32.5    32.0     30.5

                                                                    13
An Agenda to Restore Fiscal Solvency and Growth
• Reduce the size of the government: cut spending and privatize
• Primary fiscal adjustment required to reduce debt/GDP: 4.5%-5.0% of GDP in 4-5 years
(a)   privatization revenues: 1.5% of GDP
(b)   Buoyancy to growth of tax system: adds 1.0% GDP/yr in revenue (if GDP grows 3%)
(c)   Eliminate tax exemptions (save 0.5%-1.0% of GDP)
(d)   cutting primary spending (reduce subsidies and payroll) by 1.5% of GDP
(e)   Eliminate wage indexation practices and deep social security and pension reform
• Structural reforms to boost productivity (TFP) to 2.0% from 0% - 0.5%
(a)   open up the economy to trade
(b)   tax reform (simplify tax system and reduce tax burden once D/GDP stabilizes)
(c)   increase competition (anti-trust laws/regulatory agencies)
(d)   boost credit growth: increase competition in the banking system, reduce reserve requirements, review
      prudential regulation, eliminate earmarked credit, shrink size of federal banks
(e)   new labor market reform to reduce unit labor costs
(f)   Rebuild infrastructure funded with private and external financing

                                                                                                             14
Brazil - Understanding the October Elections
• General elections: President; 27 governors; all 531 house seats; 2/3rd of Senate (54
  seats)
• Registered voters: 147 million (or 110 mn net of 25% null/blank)
• To win in 1st round (October 7) a candidate must receive the majority (50%, or 55mn)
  of the valid votes, otherwise the election goes to a 2nd round (October 28)
• Exit polls released only after the ballots close (8m) but vote count is fast
• There are 13 presidential candidates, but only 5 are viable: Bolsonaro, Haddad,
  Marina, Alckmin, and Ciro
• TSE did not allow Lula to run, so PT has until September 10 to replace him with
  Haddad
• Keys to outcome: (a) transfers of votes from Lula to Haddad (or Marina/ Ciro); (b)
  undecided votes; (c) TV campaign; (d) role of social media

                                                                                         15
Economic Team and Policies of the Viable Candidates
       Candidate (party)                        Chief economist                       Policy orientation

Geraldo Alckmin (PSDB gov SP)        Persio Arida (Real plan of 1994, finance)   Orthodox, reforms, negotiator

Jair Bolsonaro (PSL - Congressman)   Paulo Guedes (Chicago PhD, finance)         Army, hard liner, pro reforms

Fernando Haddad (PT)                 Marcio Pochman (PhD Unicamp)                Heterodox/ return to crisis

Marina da Silva (Rede, Senator)      Eduardo Gianetti (economist, academic)      Leftist background; hesitant

Ciro Gomes (minister, governor CE)   Mauro Benevides (PhD Vanderbilt)            Leftist and populist

                                                                                                                 16
Votes for the Left & Right: ½ to ¾ of Total
                                    Datafolha Poll August 22 (in percent)
45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

 5

 0
                          w/ Lula                                               w/out Lula
       LULA   BOLSONARO    MARINA   CIRO   ALCKMIN    HADDAD     A DIAS     OTHER   NULL/VOID   DONT KNOW

                                                                                                            17
Ibope Poll Sept 6 2018 – Bolsonaro Leads
                            First Round Presidential Elecion in %
25

20

15

10

5

0
                                            FIRST ROUND
      BOLSONARO   MARINA   CIRO   ALCKMIN   HADDAD    A DIAS   OTHER   DON’T KNOW   BLANK/NULL
Ibope – Second Round – Bolsonaro Weakened

                                      Second Round in %
50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0
     Ciro vs. Bolsonaro   Alckmin x Bolsonaro           Bolsonaro x Marina   Haddad x Bolsonaro
                                                1   2
A Polarized Election; Alckmin not Doing Well in the Race
                       Alckmin
                          vs            Alckmin
                       Bolsonaro

                       Alckmin
                          vs            Haddad
 1st Round October 7    Haddad
     w/out Lula        Bolsonaro
                                       Bolsonaro
                          vs
                                       or Haddad
                        Haddad

                       Bolsonaro
                          vs            Marina
                        Marina
                                                           20
Four Scenarios for the Next Government
• Bullish – Alckmin – not priced in, large upside for Ibovespa and BRL
• Strongest economic and political teams – likely to deliver a good portion of the required
  adjustment & reforms in Congress
• Bearish – Haddad – end of Lava Jato and largest market downside
• Return of heterodox policies and spending, pushing fiscal toward insolvency
• Bolsonaro – buy the rumor and sell the news – markets may like initial effort by
  Guedes, but would sell off afterward
• Main concerns about Bolsonaro: governance and ability to build consensus
• Marina – economic program is in the right direction but it’s not strong enough
• Marina may have a hard time to build an effective coalition in Congress
• Skewed distribution of outcomes: neutral to bearish scenarios 3 to 4 times more likely
  than the bullish scenario

                                                                                              21
Brazil: Effect of the Elections on Asset Prices
              Alckmin    Bolsonaro    Marina    Haddad     Ciro    Current     E(X)

Probability
                  20%          35%       15%       25%       5%

5-yr CDS bp
                  180          350       425        800     700        305      457

IBOVESPA
               91,452       70,113     67,065    57,158   64,779     76,210   70,418
(% change)
                  20%          -8%      -12%       -25%    -15%                -7.6%
BRL
                  3.40         4.35      4.50      5.00     4.75       4.13     4.37

SELIC
                  6.25         6.50      6.75      9.00     8.00       6.50     7.19

                                                                                 22
Conclusions
• The global economic outlook is good: strong growth/low inflation
• Financial markets: volatile, stretched valuations, and prone to slide into a bear
  market in 2019
• Main downside risks for global scenario – Fed tightens faster; US government makes
  policy mistakes; trade war intensifies
• EM: interesting valuations but tighter financial conditions, protectionism, and
  external/fiscal fragilities undermine the asset class
• Brazil: growing risk that next president will not be market friendly
• Best case – Alckmin – candidate remains weak in the polls
• Worst case – Haddad (PT) wins and debt dynamics becomes unstable
• Intermediate cases (Marina or Bolsonaro) – gain time but fail to restore fiscal
  solvency and growth

                                                                                       23
You can also read