It is 100 seconds to midnight - 2020 Doomsday Clock Statement Science and Security Board - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
It is 100 seconds to midnight
2020 Doomsday Clock Statement
Science and Security Board
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Editor, John Mecklin
®Statement from the President and CEO
Inside the two-minute warning building measures that reduced the likelihood of
nuclear war. In 2016, another optimistic moment
In the year 2020, several important anniversaries appeared: Countries from around the world began
should cause us all to assess progress, or lack charting paths toward reducing greenhouse gas
thereof, toward a safer and more secure planet. emissions and investing in bridges to a cleaner
April marks the 50th anniversary of Earth future by adopting the Paris agreement, which
Day, established to advocate for a healthy and builds on the UN Framework Convention on
sustainable environment. On the first Earth Day— Climate Change process.
April 22, 1970—20 million Americans, almost 10
percent of the US population, took to the streets The Bulletin’s Science and Security Board
to advocate for more sustainable practices. May convened in Chicago in November 2019
2020 also marks the 50th anniversary of the Treaty with a keen recognition of this year’s
on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons historic anniversaries. What follows is an
(NPT), a landmark agreement that became acknowledgment that we live in troubling times,
the bedrock for global efforts at nuclear arms with the risk of nuclear accident seemingly
control. July and August 2020 will also mark the growing by the day as the time available to
75th anniversary of the testing and then the use responsibly stem the climate crisis shrinks just
of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as quickly. For these reasons, and others spelled
the first and only time such weapons have been out in the pages that follow, the time on the
brandished as an instrument of war. Efforts to Doomsday Clock continues to tick ever closer to
curb their use have been on-going ever since. midnight.
The past 75 years have seen the risks of nuclear As seasoned watchers know, the Doomsday Clock
war reach startling heights that have included the did not move in 2019. But the Clock’s minute hand
United States and Soviet Union testing hydrogen was set forward in January 2018 by 30 seconds, to
bombs; multiple moments when by either two minutes before midnight, the closest it had
accident or design a nuclear exchange between been to midnight since 1953 in the early years of
the great powers seemed possible if not probable; the Cold War. Previously, the Clock was moved
an increasing number of states obtaining nuclear from three minutes to midnight to two and a half
weapons; and most recently North Korean and minutes to midnight in January 2017. This year,
American leaders exchanging childish name the Science and Security Board moved the time
calling and not-so-childish nuclear threats. On the from two minutes to 100 seconds to midnight, a
climate side, the past 50 years have resulted in a decision taken in full recognition of its historic
growing consensus that humans are dangerously nature. You will see in the following statement
disrupting their environment. As early as 1978, the the articulation of why board members reset the
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists asked the question clock, and what they suggest leaders and citizens
“Is mankind warming the earth?” with a cover around the world do to eventually begin moving it
story that answered “Yes.” away from midnight.
But just as humanity has come perilously close US sports terminology provides an analogy for
to obliterating itself, it has also experienced the current moment. As fans who watch it know,
moments of exquisite forethought, well-planned American football incorporates a two-minute
efforts to protect the planet accomplished by warning, a break at the end of each half that
determined people. Political leaders were able differentiates the last two minutes from all that
to cut the number of total nuclear warheads came before. Decisions are made with different
significantly, and undertake a series of confidence- strategic reference points, and expectations
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 1Statement from the President and CEO (cont.)
are raised for decisive action. The last two among the Board’s expert membership. None of
minutes bring newfound vigilance and focus to this would have been possible without the support
participants and viewers alike. Every second of foundations, corporations and individuals
matters. who contribute to the Bulletin year in and year
out. For a full listing of our financial supporters,
As far as the Bulletin and the Doomsday Clock are please see our annual report on our website at the
concerned, the world has entered into the realm thebulletin.org.
of the two-minute warning, a period when danger
is high and the margin for error low. The moment In addition to the anniversaries listed above,
demands attention and new, creative responses. December 2020 also marks the 75th anniversary
If decision makers continue to fail to act— of the first edition of the Bulletin of the Atomic
pretending that being inside two minutes is no Scientists, initially a six-page, black-and-white
more urgent than the preceding period—citizens bulletin and later a magazine, created in
around the world should rightfully echo the words anticipation that “the atom bomb would be on the
of climate activist Greta Thunberg and ask: “How first of many dangerous presents from Pandora’s
dare you?” box of modern science.” Over the years, we’ve
published debates and recommendations that
Public engagement and civic action are needed have laid the foundation for turning the hands of
and needed urgently. Science and technology the Doomsday Clock away from midnight. We
can bring enormous benefits, but without have done it before, which means we can certainly
constant vigilance, they bring enormous risks do it again. In 2020, however, world leaders have
as well. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists less time before midnight in which to make their
is grateful to our supporters, who allow us to decisions, and the need to take urgent action to
carry on our important work and share it with reduce the risk of nuclear war and climate change
our growing global audience. More people came is great. Please continue to petition your leaders
to the Bulletin’s website in 2019 than any year to act now, and as if their lives depend upon it.
prior, and our magazine continues to be read Because theirs—and ours—most certainly do.
and downloaded by followers around the world.
The resurgent interest in issues of nuclear risk, Rachel Bronson, PhD
climate change, and other disruptive technologies, President & CEO
especially among those 35 years and younger, 23 January, 2020
shows that young people are hardly apathetic to Chicago, IL
the deteriorating environment in which we now
operate. Rather, it shows that tomorrow’s leaders
are seeking new images, messages, policies, and
approaches and no longer assume that today’s
leaders will keep them safe and secure.
I thank the members of the Bulletin’s Science and
Security Board for once again taking seriously
their responsibility for setting the Doomsday
Clock and producing this statement to explain
their decision. John Mecklin, the Bulletin’s editor-
in-chief and the writer of this report, ensured
that it offers the strongest possible articulation
of the ideas and approaches that were discussed
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 2It is 100 seconds to midnight
Editor’s note: Founded in 1945 by University of Chicago scientists who had helped develop the first atomic weapons
in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later,
using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero)
to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The decision to move (or to leave in place) the minute hand of the
Doomsday Clock is made every year by the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of
Sponsors, which includes 13 Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the world’s
vulnerability to catastrophe from nuclear weapons, climate change, and new technologies emerging in other domains.
To: Leaders and citizens of the world manifested by one of the warmest years on record,
Re: Closer than ever: It is 100 seconds to extensive wildfires, and quicker-than-expected
midnight melting of glacial ice.
Date: January 23, 2020
Continued corruption of the information
Humanity continues to face two simultaneous ecosphere on which democracy and public
existential dangers—nuclear war and climate decision making depend has heightened the
change—that are compounded by a threat nuclear and climate threats. In the last year, many
multiplier, cyber-enabled information warfare, governments used cyber-enabled disinformation
that undercuts society’s ability to respond. The campaigns to sow distrust in institutions and
international security situation is dire, not just among nations, undermining domestic and
because these threats exist, but because world international efforts to foster peace and protect the
leaders have allowed the international political planet.
infrastructure for managing them to erode.
This situation—two major threats to human
In the nuclear realm, national leaders have ended civilization, amplified by sophisticated,
or undermined several major arms control technology-propelled propaganda—would be
treaties and negotiations during the last year, serious enough if leaders around the world were
creating an environment conducive to a renewed focused on managing the danger and reducing the
nuclear arms race, to the proliferation of nuclear risk of catastrophe. Instead, over the last two years,
weapons, and to lowered barriers to nuclear war. we have seen influential leaders denigrate and
Political conflicts regarding nuclear programs in discard the most effective methods for addressing
Iran and North Korea remain unresolved and are, complex threats—international agreements with
if anything, worsening. US-Russia cooperation strong verification regimes—in favor of their
on arms control and disarmament is all but own narrow interests and domestic political gain.
nonexistent. By undermining cooperative, science- and law-
based approaches to managing the most urgent
Public awareness of the climate crisis grew threats to humanity, these leaders have helped to
over the course of 2019, largely because of mass create a situation that will, if unaddressed, lead to
protests by young people around the world. Just catastrophe, sooner rather than later.
the same, governmental action on climate change
still falls far short of meeting the challenge at Faced with this daunting threat landscape and a
hand. At UN climate meetings last year, national new willingness of political leaders to reject the
delegates made fine speeches but put forward few negotiations and institutions that can protect
concrete plans to further limit the carbon dioxide civilization over the long term, the Bulletin of the
emissions that are disrupting Earth’s climate. This Atomic Scientists Science and Security Board
limited political response came during a year today moves the Doomsday Clock 20 seconds
when the effects of manmade climate change were closer to midnight—closer to apocalypse than
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 3ever. In so doing, board members are explicitly stockpile of low-enriched uranium, increased
warning leaders and citizens around the world that its uranium enrichment levels, and added new
the international security situation is now more and improved centrifuges—all to express its
dangerous than it has ever been, even at the height frustration that the United States had withdrawn
of the Cold War. from the Iran nuclear deal (formally known
as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or
Civilization-ending nuclear war—whether started JCPOA), re-imposed economic sanctions on Iran,
by design, blunder, or simple miscommunication— and pressured other parties to the Iran nuclear
is a genuine possibility. Climate change that could agreement to stop their compliance with the
devastate the planet is undeniably happening. And agreement. Early this year, amid high US-Iranian
for a variety of reasons that include a corrupted tensions, the US military conducted a drone air
and manipulated media environment, democratic strike that killed a prominent Iranian general
governments and other institutions that should be in Iraq. Iranian leaders vowed to exact “severe
working to address these threats have failed to rise revenge” on US military forces, and the Iranian
to the challenge. government announced it would no longer
The Bulletin believes that human observe limits, imposed by
beings can manage the dangers the JCPOA, on the number of
posed by the technology that centrifuges that it uses to enrich
humans create. Indeed, in the
The uranium.
1990s leaders in the United international Although Iran has not formally
States and the Soviet Union took
bold actions that made nuclear
security exited the nuclear deal,
its actions appear likely to
war markedly less likely—and as situation is reduce the “breakout time” it
a result the Bulletin moved the
minute hand of the Doomsday
now more would need to build a nuclear
weapon, to less than the 12
Clock the farthest it has been dangerous months envisioned by parties
from midnight.
than it has to the JCPOA. At that point,
But given the inaction— other parties to the nuclear
and in too many cases
ever been. agreement—including the
counterproductive actions— European Union and possibly
of international leaders, the Russia and China—may be
members of the Science and Security Board are compelled to acknowledge
compelled to declare a state of emergency that that Iran is not complying. What little is left of the
requires the immediate, focused, and unrelenting agreement could crumble, reducing constraints
attention of the entire world. It is 100 seconds to on the Iranian nuclear program and increasing
midnight. The Clock continues to tick. Immediate the likelihood of military conflict with the United
action is required. States.
A retreat from arms control creates a The demise of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear
dangerous nuclear reality Forces (INF) Treaty became official in 2019, and,
as predicted, the United States and Russia have
The world is sleepwalking its way through a newly begun a new competition to develop and deploy
unstable nuclear landscape. The arms control weapons the treaty had long banned. Meanwhile,
boundaries that have helped prevent nuclear the United States continues to suggest that it
catastrophe for the last half century are being will not extend New START, the agreement that
steadily dismantled. limits US and Russian deployed strategic nuclear
weapons and delivery systems, and that it may
In several areas, a bad situation continues to
withdraw from the Open Skies Treaty, which
worsen. Throughout 2019, Iran increased its
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 4provides aerial overflights to build confidence and material in reserve from which to draw, if they
transparency around the world. Russia, meanwhile, choose. Should China decide to build up to US
continues to support an extension of New START. and Russian arsenal levels—a development
previously dismissed as unlikely but now being
The assault on arms control is exacerbated by debated—deterrence calculations could become
the decay of great power relations. Despite more complicated, making the situation more
declaring its intent to bring China into an arms dangerous. An unconstrained North Korea,
control agreement, the United States has adopted coupled with a more assertive China, could further
a bullying and derisive tone toward its Chinese destabilize Northeast Asian security.
and Russian competitors. The three countries
disagree on whether to pursue negotiations on As we wrote last year and re-emphasize now,
outer space, missile defenses, and cyberwarfare. any belief that the threat of nuclear war has been
One of the few issues they do agree on: They vanquished is a mirage.
all oppose the Treaty on the Prohibition of
Nuclear Weapons, which opened for signature An insufficient response to an increasingly
in 2017. As an alternative, the United States has threatened climate
promoted, within the context In the past year, some countries
of the review conference have taken action to combat
process of the Nuclear Non- climate change, but others—
Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Any belief including the United States,
an initiative called “Creating that the which formalized its withdrawal
the Environment for Nuclear from the Paris Agreement,
Disarmament.” The success threat of and Brazil, which dismantled
of this initiative may depend nuclear war policies that had protected the
on its reception at the 2020 Amazon rainforest—have taken
NPT Review Conference—a has been major steps backward. The
landmark 50th anniversary of vanquished highly anticipated UN Climate
the treaty. Action Summit in September fell
is a mirage. far short of Secretary General
US efforts to reach agreement
with North Korea made little António Guterres’ request
progress in 2019, despite an that countries come not with
early summit in Hanoi and subsequent working- “beautiful speeches, but with
level meetings. After a North Korean deadline concrete plans.” The 60 or so countries that have
for end-of-year progress passed, Kim Jong Un committed (in more or less vague terms) to net
announced he would demonstrate a new “strategic zero emissions of carbon dioxide account for just
weapon” and indicated that North Korea would 11 percent of global emissions. The UN climate
forge ahead without sanctions relief. Until now, the conference in Madrid similarly disappointed.
willingness of both sides to continue a dialogue The countries involved in negotiations there
was positive, but Chairman Kim seems to have lost barely reached an agreement, and the result was
faith in President Trump’s willingness to come to little more than a weak nudge, asking countries
an agreement. to consider further curbing their emissions. The
agreement made no advances in providing further
Without conscious efforts to reinvigorate arms support to poorer countries to cut emissions and
control, the world is headed into an unregulated deal with increasingly damaging climate impacts.
nuclear environment. Such an outcome could
reproduce the intense arms race that was the Lip service continued, with some governments
hallmark of the early decades of the nuclear now echoing many scientists’ use of the term
age. Both the United States and Russia have “climate emergency.” But the policies and
massive stockpiles of warheads and fissile actions that governments proposed were hardly
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 5commensurate to an emergency. Exploration and climate problem. We hope that public support for
exploitation of fossil fuels continues to grow. A strong climate policies will continue to spread,
recent UN report finds that global governmental corporations will accelerate their investments in
support and private sector investment have put low-carbon technologies, the price of renewable
fossil fuels on course to be over-produced at more energy will continue to decline, and politicians will
than twice the level needed to meet the emissions- take action. We also hope that these developments
reduction goals set out in Paris. will happen rapidly enough to lead to the major
transformation that is needed to check climate
Unsurprisingly, these continuing trends are change.
reflected in our atmosphere and environment:
Greenhouse gas emissions rose again over the But the actions of many world leaders continue to
past year, taking both annual emissions and increase global risk, at a time when the opposite is
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases urgently needed.
to record highs. The world is heading in the
opposite direction from the clear demands of The increased threat of information warfare
climate science and plain arithmetic: Net carbon and other disruptive technologies
dioxide emissions need to go down to zero if Nuclear war and climate change are major
the world is to stop the continuing buildup of threats to the physical world. But information
greenhouse gases. World emissions are going in is an essential aspect of human interaction, and
the wrong direction. threats to the information
The consequences of climate ecosphere—especially
when coupled with
change in the lives of people World carbon the emergence of new
around the world have been
striking and tragic. India dioxide emissions destabilizing technologies in
artificial intelligence, space,
was ravaged in 2019 both by are going in the hypersonics, and biology—
record-breaking heat waves
and record-breaking floods, wrong direction. portend a dangerous
each taking a heavy toll and multifaceted global
on human lives. Wildfires instability.
from the Arctic to Australia, In recent years, national leaders have increasingly
and many regions in between, have erupted with dismissed information with which they do not
a frequency, intensity, extent, and duration that agree as fake news, promulgating their own
further degrade ecosystems and endanger people. untruths, exaggerations, and misrepresentations
It is not good news when wildfires spring up in response. Unfortunately, this trend accelerated
simultaneously in both the northern and southern in 2019. Leaders claimed their lies to be truth,
hemispheres, making the notion of a limited “fire calling into question the integrity of, and creating
season” increasingly a thing of the past. public distrust in, national institutions that
The dramatic effects of a changing climate, have historically provided societal stability and
alongside the glacial progress of government cohesion.
responses, have unsurprisingly led to rising In the United States, there is active political
concern and anger among growing numbers of antagonism toward science and a growing sense of
people. Climate change has catalyzed a wave of government-sanctioned disdain for expert opinion,
youth engagement, activism, and protest that creating fear and doubt regarding well-established
seems akin to the mobilization triggered by science about climate change and other urgent
nuclear disaster and nuclear weapons fears in challenges. Countries have long attempted to
the 1970s and 1980s. Politicians are taking notice, employ propaganda in service of their political
and, in some cases, starting to propose policies agendas. Now, however, the internet provides
scaled to the urgency and magnitude of the
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 6widespread, inexpensive access to worldwide There is increasing investment in and deployment
audiences, facilitating the broadcast of false and of hypersonic weapons that will severely limit
manipulative messages to large populations and response times available to targeted nations
enabling millions of individuals to indulge in their and create a dangerous degree of ambiguity and
prejudices, biases, and ideological differences. uncertainty, at least in part because of their likely
ability to carry either nuclear or conventional
The recent emergence of so-called “deepfakes”— warheads. This uncertainty could lead to rapid
audio and video recordings that are essentially escalation of military conflicts. At a minimum,
undetectable as false—threatens to further these weapons are highly destabilizing and presage
undermine the ability of citizens and decision a new arms race.
makers to separate truth from fiction. The
resulting falsehoods hold the potential to Meanwhile, space has become a new arena for
create economic, social, and military chaos, weapons development, with multiple countries
increasing the possibility of misunderstandings or testing and deploying kinetic, laser, and
provocations that could lead to war, and fomenting radiofrequency anti-satellite capabilities, and the
public confusion that leads to inaction on serious United States creating a new military service, the
issues facing the planet. Agreement on facts is Space Force.
essential to democracy and effective collective
action. The overall global trend is toward complex, high-
tech, highly automated, high-speed warfare. The
Other new technologies, including developments computerized and increasingly AI-assisted nature
in biological engineering, high-speed (hypersonic) of militaries, the sophistication of their weapons,
weapons, and space weapons, present further and the new, more aggressive military doctrines
opportunities for disruption. asserted by the most heavily armed countries
could result in global catastrophe.
Genetic engineering and synthetic biology
technologies are now increasingly affordable, How the world should respond
readily available, and spreading rapidly. Globally,
governments and companies are collecting vast To say the world is nearer to doomsday today
amounts of health-related data, including genomic than during the Cold War—when the United
data, ostensibly for the purpose of improving States and Soviet Union had tens of thousands
healthcare and increasing profits. But the same more nuclear weapons than they now possess—
data could also be useful in developing highly is to make a profound assertion that demands
effective biological weapons, and disagreements serious explanation. After much deliberation, the
regarding verification of the Biological and Toxin members of the Science and Security Board have
Weapons Convention continue to place the world concluded that the complex technological threats
at risk. the world faces are at least as dangerous today as
they were last year and the year before, when we
Artificial intelligence is progressing at a frenzied set the Clock at two minutes to midnight (as close
pace. In addition to the concern about marginally as it had ever been, and the same setting that was
controlled AI development and its incorporation announced in 1953, after the United States and
into weaponry that would make kill decisions the Soviet Union tested their first thermonuclear
without human supervision, AI is now being weapons).
used in military command and control systems.
Research and experience have demonstrated the But this year, we move the Clock 20 seconds closer
vulnerability of these systems to hacking and to midnight not just because trends in our major
manipulation. Given AI’s known shortcomings, it areas of concern—nuclear weapons and climate
is crucial that the nuclear command and control change—have failed to improve significantly over
system remain firmly in the hands of human the last two years. We move the Clock toward
decision makers. midnight because the means by which political
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 7leaders had previously managed these potentially Because of the worldwide governmental trend
civilization-ending dangers are themselves toward dysfunction in dealing with global threats,
being dismantled or undermined, without a we feel compelled to move the Doomsday Clock
realistic effort to replace them with new or better forward. The need for emergency action is urgent.
management regimes. In effect, the international
political infrastructure for controlling existential There are many practical, concrete steps that
risk is degrading, leaving the world in a situation leaders could take—and citizens should demand—
of high and rising threat. Global leaders are to improve the current, absolutely unacceptable
not responding appropriately to reduce this state of world security affairs. Among them:
threat level and counteract the hollowing-out of • US and Russian leaders can return to the
international political institutions, negotiations, negotiating table to: reinstate the INF Treaty
and agreements that aim to contain it. The result is or take other action to restrain an unnecessary
a heightened and growing risk of disaster. arms race in medium-range missiles; extend
To be sure, some of these negative trends have the limits of New START beyond 2021; seek
been long in development. That they could be further reductions in nuclear arms; discuss
seen coming miles a lowering of the alert status of the nuclear
in the distance but arsenals of both countries; limit nuclear
modernization programs that threaten to
still were allowed The create a new nuclear arms race; and start
to occur is not
just disheartening need for talks on cyber warfare, missile defenses, the
militarization of space, hypersonic technology,
but also a sign emergency and the elimination of battlefield nuclear
of fundamental
dysfunction in the action is weapons.
world’s efforts to urgent. • The countries of the world should publicly
manage and reduce rededicate themselves to the temperature
existential risk. goal of the Paris climate agreement, which is
Last year, we called the extremely troubling state restricting warming “well below” 2 degrees
of world security an untenable “new abnormal.” Celsius higher than the preindustrial level.
That goal is consistent with consensus views
“In this extraordinarily dangerous state of affairs, on climate science, and, notwithstanding
nuclear war and climate change pose severe the inadequate climate action to date, it may
threats to humanity, yet go largely unaddressed,” well remain within reach if major changes in
we wrote. “Meanwhile, the use of cyber-enabled the worldwide energy system and land use
information warfare by countries, leaders, and are undertaken promptly. If that goal is to be
subnational groups of many stripes around attained, industrialized countries will need
the world exacerbates these enormous threats to curb emissions rapidly, going beyond their
and endangers the information ecosystem that initial, inadequate pledges and supporting
underpins democracy and civilization as we know developing countries so they can leapfrog
it. At the same time, other disruptive technologies the entrenched, fossil fuel-intensive patterns
complicate and further darken the world security previously pursued by industrialized countries.
situation.”
• US citizens should demand climate action
This dangerous situation remains—and continues from their government. Climate change is a
to deteriorate. Compounding the nuclear, climate, serious and worsening threat to humanity.
and information warfare threats, the world’s Citizens should insist that their government
institutional and political capacity for dealing acknowledge it and act accordingly. President
with these threats and reducing the possibility of Trump’s decision to withdraw the United
civilization-scale catastrophe has been diminished. States from the Paris climate change agreement
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 8was a dire mistake. Whoever wins the 2020 creative ways—that their leaders take immediate
US presidential election should reverse that steps to reduce the existential threats of nuclear
decision. war and climate change. It is now 100 seconds
to midnight, the most dangerous situation that
• The United States and other signatories of humanity has ever faced. Now is the time to
the Iran nuclear deal can work together to unite—and act.
restrain nuclear proliferation in the Middle
East. Iran is poised to violate key thresholds
of the deal. Whoever wins the United States’
2020 presidential election must prioritize
dealing with this problem, whether through a
return to the original nuclear agreement or via
negotiation of a new and broader accord.
• The international community should begin
multilateral discussions aimed at establishing
norms of behavior, both domestic and
international, that discourage and penalize
the misuse of science. Science provides
the world’s searchlight in times of fog and
confusion. Furthermore, focused attention is
needed to prevent information technology
from undermining public trust in political
institutions, in the media, and in the existence
of objective reality itself. Cyber-enabled
information warfare is a threat to the common
good. Deception campaigns—and leaders
intent on blurring the line between fact and
politically motivated fantasy—are a profound
threat to effective democracies, reducing their
ability to address nuclear weapons, climate
change, and other existential dangers.
The global security situation is unsustainable
and extremely dangerous, but that situation can
be improved, if leaders seek change and citizens
demand it. There is no reason the Doomsday
Clock cannot move away from midnight. It has
done so in the past when wise leaders acted,
under pressure from informed and engaged
citizens around the world. We believe that mass
civic engagement will be necessary to compel the
change the world needs.
Citizens around the world have the power to
unmask social media disinformation and improve
the long-term prospects of their children and
grandchildren. They can insist on facts, and
discount nonsense. They can demand—through
public protest, at the ballot box, and in many other
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 9Science and Security Board Biographies
Rachel Bronson is the President and CEO of attended the University of California, Berkeley,
the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, where and earned a JD at Yale Law School.
she oversees the publishing programs, the
management of the Doomsday Clock, and Lynn Eden is Senior Research Scholar (Emeritus)
activities around nuclear risk, climate change, at Stanford University’s Center for International
and disruptive technologies. Before joining the Security and Cooperation. Her scholarly work
Bulletin, she served as vice president for Studies focuses on the military and society; science,
at The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, adjunct technology, and organizations; and US nuclear
professor of “Global Energy” at the Kellogg School weapons history and policy. Eden’s Whole
of Management, and senior fellow and director World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and
of Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Nuclear Weapons Devastation won the American
Relations, among other positions. Her book, Sociological Association’s 2004 Robert K. Merton
Thicker than Oil: America’s Uneasy Partnership award for best book in science and technology
with Saudi Arabia (Oxford University Press, 2006), studies. Her current research and writing (mostly
has been translated into Japanese and published historical) asks how a specific US military
in paperback. Her writings and commentary planning organization has enabled good people
have appeared in outlets including Foreign to plan what, if put into action, could or would
Affairs, Foreign Policy, The New York Times, The result in the deaths of tens or hundreds of millions
Washington Post, “PBS NewsHour,” and “The of people. In other words, how do US military
Daily Show.” Bronson has served as a consultant to officers make plans to fight and prevail in nuclear
NBC News and testified before the congressional war? Eden argues that the answer is three-fold: 1)
Task Force on Anti-Terrorism and Proliferation because nuclear war has not occurred, the horrific
Financing, Congress’s Joint Economic Committee, human, societal, and ecological consequences of
and the 9/11 Commission. use are not fully vivid to most planners, most of
the time; 2) deadline-driven, depersonalized, and
Edmund G Brown Jr. (Executive Chair) quantitative organizational routines focus war
completed his fourth term as Governor of the State planners on abstract operations and entities; and,
of California in 2019. He began his career in public 3) U.S. intention is not to destroy cities and to
service in 1969 as a trustee for the LA Community kill vast numbers of people per se. This provides
College District and became California Secretary some moral comfort, even though many “civilian
of State in 1970 and Governor of California in 1974 objects” would be destroyed in the course of
and 1978. After his governorship, Brown lectured striking leadership and command and control
and traveled widely, practiced law, served as structures in and near cities.
chairman of the state Democratic Party, and ran for
president. Brown was elected Mayor of Oakland in Rod Ewing is the Frank Stanton Professor in
1998 and California Attorney General in 2006; he Nuclear Security in the Center for International
was elected to a third gubernatorial term in 2010 Security and Cooperation in the Freeman Spogli
and a fourth term in 2014. During this time, Brown Institute for International Studies and a Professor
helped eliminate the state’s multi-billion budget in the Department of Geological Sciences in
deficit, spearheaded successful campaigns to the School of Earth, Energy and Environmental
provide new funding for California’s schools, and Sciences at Stanford University. Ewing’s research
established a robust Rainy Day Fund to prepare for focuses on the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle,
the next economic downturn. His administration mainly nuclear materials and the geochemistry
established nation-leading targets to protect the of radionuclides. He is the past president of
environment and fight climate change. Brown the International Union of Materials Research
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 10Biographies (cont.)
Societies. Ewing has written extensively on issues of Homeland Security and the Department of
related to nuclear waste management and is co- Health and Human Services. George also served
editor of Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future on active duty in the US Army as a military
and Uncertainty Underground: Yucca Mountain and intelligence officer and as a paratrooper. She is
the Nation’s High-Level Nuclear Waste. He received a decorated Desert Storm Veteran. She holds a
the Lomonosov Medal of the Russian Academy of Bachelor of Arts in Natural Sciences from Johns
Sciences in 2006. Hopkins University, a Master of Science in Public
Health from the University of North Carolina
Steve Fetter is associate provost, dean of the at Chapel Hill, and a Doctorate in Public Health
graduate school, and professor of public policy from the University of Hawaii at Manoa. She is
at the University of Maryland. He served for also a graduate of the Harvard University National
five years in the White House Office of Science Preparedness Leadership Initiative.
and Technology Policy during the Obama
Administration, where he led the environment and Daniel Holz is a professor at the University of
energy and the national security and international Chicago in the Departments of Physics, Astronomy
affairs divisions. He is a fellow of the American & Astrophysics, the Enrico Fermi Institute, and
Physical Society and a member of the Union the Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics.
of Concerned Scientists board of directors and His research focuses on general relativity in the
the National Academy of Sciences Committee context of astrophysics and cosmology. He is a
on International Security and Arms Control. member of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-
He has worked on nuclear policy issues in the Wave Observatory (LIGO) collaboration, and was
Pentagon and the State Department and has been part of the team that announced the first detection
a visiting fellow at Stanford, Harvard, MIT, and of gravitational waves in early 2016 and the first
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also multi-messenger detection of a binary neutron
served as associate director of the Joint Global star in 2017. He received a 2012 National Science
Change Research Institute and vice chairman Foundation CAREER Award, the 2015 Quantrell
of the Federation of American Scientists. He is Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching,
a recipient of the American Physical Society’s and the Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental
Joseph A. Burton Forum Award, the Federation Physics in 2016. Holz was selected as a Kavli
of American Scientists’ Hans Bethe ‘Science in Fellow of the National Academy of Sciences and
the Public Service’ award, and the Secretary of is a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He
Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service. received his PhD in physics from the University
of Chicago and his AB in physics from Princeton
Asha George is the executive director of the University.
Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense. She is a
public health security professional whose research Sivan Kartha is a senior scientist at the
and programmatic emphasis has been practical, Stockholm Environmental Institute whose
academic, and political. George served in the US research and publications for the past 25 years
House of Representatives as a senior professional have focused on technological options and
staffer and subcommittee staff director at the policy strategies for addressing climate change,
House Committee on Homeland Security in the concentrating most recently on equity and
110th and 111th Congress. She has worked for a efficiency in the design of an international climate
variety of organizations, including government regime. He is a co-leader of SEI’s Gender and
contractors, foundations, and non-profits. As a Social Equity Programme, and co-director of the
contractor, she supported and worked with all Climate Equity Reference Project. His current
federal Departments, especially the Department work deals primarily with the economic, political,
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 11Biographies (cont.)
and ethical dimensions of equitably sharing the Future War, looks at how future technology will
effort of an ambitious global response to climate change virtually every aspect of war as we know
change. Kartha has also worked on mitigation it and how we can respond to the serious national
scenarios, market mechanisms for climate actions, security challenges ahead.
and the environmental and socioeconomic impacts
of biomass energy. His work has enabled him to Herb Lin is senior research scholar for cyber
advise and collaborate with diverse organizations, policy and security at the Center for International
including the UN Climate Convention Secretariat, Security and Cooperation and Hank J. Holland
various United Nations and World Bank programs, Fellow in Cyber Policy and Security at the Hoover
numerous government policy-making bodies Institution, both at Stanford University. His
and agencies, foundations, and civil society research interests relate broadly to policy-related
organizations throughout the developing and dimensions of cybersecurity and cyberspace, and
industrialized world. He served as a coordinating he is particularly knowledgeable about the use of
lead author in the preparation of the Fifth offensive operations in cyberspace as instruments
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental of national policy and the security dimensions of
Panel on Climate Change, released in 2014, co- information warfare and influence operations on
leading the chapter on Equity and Sustainable national security. In 2016, he served on President
Development, and has been selected as a lead Obama’s Commission on Enhancing National
author for the upcoming IPCC Sixth Assessment Cybersecurity. He has also served as professional
Report, to be released in 2021. staff member and staff scientist for the House
Armed Services Committee (1986-1990), where his
Elizabeth Kolbert has been a staff writer at The portfolio included defense policy and arms control
New Yorker since 1999 and has written extensively issues.
on science and climate change to great acclaim.
Her most recent book, The Sixth Extinction, won Suzet McKinney currently serves as CEO/
the 2015 Pulitzer Prize for general nonfiction. Executive Director of the Illinois Medical District.
Kolbert is also known for her book Field Notes The Illinois Medical District (IMD), a 24/7/365
From a Catastrophe, based on her three-part environment that includes 560 acres of medical
series on global warming, “The Climate of Man,” research facilities, labs, a biotech business
which won the 2006 National Magazine Award incubator, universities, raw land development
for Public Interest and the AAAS Advancement of areas, four hospitals and more than 40 healthcare
Science Journalism Award. She is also a recipient related facilities, is one of the largest urban medical
of a Heinz Award (for educating the public districts in the United States. McKinney holds her
about environmental issues) and a Guggenheim Doctorate degree from the University of Illinois at
Fellowship. Chicago School of Public Health, with a focus on
preparedness planning, leadership and workforce
Robert Latiff retired from the US Air Force development. She received her Bachelor of Arts in
as a major general in 2006. He is a fellow at the Biology from Brandeis University (Waltham, MA)
University of Notre Dame Institute for Advanced where she was also a Howard Hughes Medical
Study and a research professor at George Mason Institute Fellow. She received her Master of Public
University’s School of Engineering. He is also a Health degree (Health Care Administration) and
member of the Air Force Studies Board, as well certificates in Managed Care and Health Care
as the Intelligence Community Studies Board Administration from Benedictine University in
and the Committee on International Security Lisle, IL. She is the author of the text: Public Heath
and Arms Control of the National Academies of Emergency Preparedness: Practical Solutions for the
Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Latiff’s book, Real World (2018).
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 12Biographies (cont.)
Steve Miller is Director of the International of electrifying the transport sector. He is a fellow
Security Program at the Belfer Center for Science of the American Physical Society, and an elected
and International Affairs in Harvard University’s member of the American Academy of Arts &
Kennedy School of Government. He is a Fellow Sciences and the Norwegian Academy of Science
of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and Letters. As chair of the Science and Security
where he is a member of the Committee on Board, Rosner is a member of the Governing
International Security Studies (CISS). Miller is also Board, ex officio.
Co-Chair of the US Pugwash Committee, and is a
member of the Council of International Pugwash. Robert Socolow is professor emeritus in the
Miller co-directed the Academy’s project on the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace
Global Nuclear Future Initiative with the Bulletin’s Engineering at Princeton University. From 2000
Science and Security Board chair, Robert Rosner. to 2019, he and Steve Pacala were the co-principal
investigators of Princeton’s Carbon Mitigation
Raymond Pierrehumbert is Halley Professor of Initiative, a twenty-five-year (2001-2025) project
Physics at the University of Oxford. He was a lead supported by BP. His best-known paper, with
author on the IPCC Third Assessment Report, Pacala, was in Science (2004): “Stabilization
and a co-author of the National Research Council Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next
report on abrupt climate change. He was awarded 50 Years with Current Technologies.” Socolow is
a John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship in 1996, a member of the American Academy of Arts and
which was used to launch collaborative work on Sciences, an associate of the National Research
the climate of Early Mars with collaborators in Council of the National Academies, a fellow of
Paris. He is a Fellow of the American Geophysical the American Physical Society, and a fellow of
Union (AGU), a Fellow of the American Academy the American Association for the Advancement
of Arts and Sciences, and has been named of Science. His awards include the 2009 Frank
Chevalier de l’Ordre des Palmes Académiques by Kreith Energy Award from the American Society
the Republic of France. Pierrehumbert’s central of Mechanical Engineers and the 2005 Axelson
research interest is the use of fundamental physical Johnson Commemorative Lecture award from
principles to elucidate the behavior of the present the Royal Academy of Engineering Sciences of
and past climates of Earth and other planets, Sweden (IVA). In 2003 he received the Leo Szilard
including the growing catalog of exoplanets. He Lectureship Award from the American Physical
leads the European Research Council Advance Society.
Grant project EXOCONDENSE.
Susan Solomon is the Lee and Geraldine
Robert Rosner (Chair) is the William E. Martin Professor of Environmental Studies at the
Wrather Distinguished Service Professor in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and was
Departments of Astronomy & Astrophysics and the Founding Director of the MIT Environmental
Physics, and the Harris School of Public Policy Solutions Initiative from 2014-2015. She is well
at the University of Chicago. Rosner served known for pioneering work that explained why
as Director of Argonne National Laboratory, there is a hole in the Antarctic ozone layer and is
where he had also served as Chief Scientist. His the author of several influential scientific papers
current scientific research is mostly in the areas in climate science. Solomon received the Crafoord
of laboratory and astrophysical fluid dynamics Prize from the Swedish Academy of Sciences
and magnetohydrodynamics, and computational in 2018, the 1999 US National Medal of Science,
physics. His policy-oriented work has focused on the nation’s highest scientific award, in 1999, and
the future of nuclear power and the back end of has also received the Grande Medaille of the
the nuclear fuel cycle, as well as various aspects French Academy of Sciences, the Blue Planet
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 13Biographies (cont.)
Prize in Japan, the BBVA Frontiers of Knowledge Department of Energy, including an on-the-ground
Award, and the Volvo Environment Prize. She is a assignment in North Korea during 1995-96. With
member of the US National Academy of Sciences, Joseph Cirincione, he is the author of Deadly
the French Academy of Sciences, and the Royal Arsenals: Tracking Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Society in the UK. She served as co-chair for the Wolfsthal is a non-resident fellow with the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
(IPCC) fourth climate science assessment report,
released in 2007. Time magazine named Solomon Editor
as one of the 100 most influential people in the
world in 2008. John Mecklin is the editor-in-chief of the Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists. Previously, he was editor-
Sharon Squassoni is Research Professor at the in-chief of Miller-McCune (since renamed Pacific
Institute for International Science and Technology Standard), an award-winning national magazine
Policy, Elliott School of International Affairs, at that focused on research-based solutions to major
the George Washington University. Previously, policy problems. Over the preceding 15 years,
she directed the Proliferation Prevention Program he was also: the editor of High Country News, a
at the Center for Strategic and International nationally acclaimed magazine that reports on the
Studies and was a senior scholar at the Carnegie American West; the consulting executive editor
Endowment for International Peace, both in for the launch of Key West, a regional magazine
Washington, DC. She has specialized in nuclear start-up directed by renowned magazine guru
nonproliferation, arms control and security policy Roger Black; and the top editor for award-winning
for three decades, serving in the US government newsweeklies in San Francisco and Phoenix. In
at the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, an earlier incarnation, he was an investigative
the State Department, and the Congressional reporter at the Houston Post and covered the
Research Service. She received a Bachelor of Arts Persian Gulf War from Saudi Arabia and Iraq.
degree from the State University of New York at Writers working at his direction have won many
Albany, a master’s in public management from the major journalism contests, including the George
University of Maryland, and a master’s in national Polk Award, the Investigative Reporters and
security strategy from the National War College. Editors certificate, and the Sidney Hillman Award
for reporting on social justice issues. Mecklin
Jon Wolfsthal is Director of the Nuclear Crisis
holds a master in public administration degree
Group, an independent project of Global Zero.
from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.
Wolfsthal served previously as Special Assistant
to the President of the United States for National
Security Affairs and senior director at the
National Security Council for arms control and
nonproliferation. During his time in government,
he was involved in almost every aspect of US
nuclear weapons, arms control, nonproliferation
and security policy. Previously, Wolfsthal was the
Deputy Director of the Center for Nonproliferation
Studies at the Monterey Institute of International
Studies, and served for three years as special
advisor to Vice President Biden on issues of
nuclear security and nonproliferation. He served
in several capacities during the 1990s at the US
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 14About the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Mission
At our core, the Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists is a media organization, publishing a
free-access website and a bimonthly magazine.
But we are much more. The Bulletin’s website,
iconic Doomsday Clock, and regular events
equip the public, policymakers, and scientists
with the information needed to reduce
manmade threats to our existence. The Bulletin
focuses on three main areas: nuclear risk,
climate change, and disruptive technologies.
What connects these topics is a driving belief
that because humans created them, we can
control them. The Bulletin is an independent,
nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization. We gather the
most informed and influential voices tracking
man-made threats and bring their innovative
thinking to a global audience. We apply
intellectual rigor to the conversation and do not
shrink from alarming truths.
The Bulletin has many audiences: the general
public, which will ultimately benefit or suffer
from scientific breakthroughs; policymakers,
whose duty is to harness those breakthroughs
for good; and the scientists themselves, who
produce those technological advances and thus
bear a special responsibility. Our community is
international, with half of our website visitors
coming from outside the United States. It is also
young. Half are under the age of 35. To learn
more visit us at https://thebulletin.org/about-
us/
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 15Timeline of Doomsday Clock changes
2019 IT IS STILL 2 MINUTES TO 2017 IT IS TWO AND A HALF MINUTES
MIDNIGHT TO MIDNIGHT
The “new abnormal” that we describe, For the last two years, the minute hand
and that the world now inhabits, is unsustainable of the Doomsday Clock stayed set at three
and extremely dangerous. The world security minutes before the hour, the closest it had
situation can be improved, if leaders seek change been to midnight since the early 1980s. In its
and citizens demand it. It is two minutes to two most recent annual announcements on the
midnight, but there is no reason the Doomsday Clock, the Science and Security Board warned:
Clock cannot move away from catastrophe. It has “The probability of global catastrophe is very
done so in the past, because wise leaders acted— high, and the actions needed to reduce the
under pressure from informed and engaged risks of disaster must be taken very soon.” In
citizens around the world. Today, citizens in 2017, we find the danger to be even greater, the
every country can use the power of the Internet need for action more urgent. It is two and a half
to fight against social media disinformation minutes to midnight, the Clock is ticking, global
and improve the long-term prospects of their danger looms. Wise public officials should act
children and grandchildren. They can insist on immediately, guiding humanity away from the
facts, and discount nonsense. They can demand brink. If they do not, wise citizens must step
action to reduce the existential threat of nuclear forward and lead the way.
war and unchecked climate change. Given the
inaction of their leaders to date, citizens of the 2016 IT IS STILL 3 MINUTES TO
world should make a loud and clear demand: MIDNIGHT
#RewindTheDoomsdayClock. “Last year, the Science and Security Board
moved the Doomsday Clock forward to three
2018 IT IS 2 MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT minutes to midnight, noting: ‘The probability of
The failure of world leaders to address global catastrophe is very high, and the actions
the largest threats to humanity’s future is needed to reduce the risks of disaster must be
lamentable—but that failure can be reversed. It is taken very soon.’ That probability has not been
two minutes to midnight, but the Doomsday Clock reduced. The Clock ticks. Global danger looms.
has ticked away from midnight in the past, and Wise leaders should act—immediately.”
during the next year, the world can again move it 2015 IT IS 3 MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT
further from apocalypse. The warning the Science “Unchecked climate change, global nuclear
and Security Board now sends is clear, the danger weapons modernizations, and outsized
obvious and imminent. The opportunity to reduce nuclear weapons arsenals pose extraordinary and
the danger is equally clear. The world has seen undeniable threats to the continued existence
the threat posed by the misuse of information of humanity, and world leaders have failed to
technology and witnessed the vulnerability of act with the speed or on the scale required to
democracies to disinformation. But there is a protect citizens from potential catastrophe. These
flip side to the abuse of social media. Leaders failures of political leadership endanger every
react when citizens insist they do so, and citizens person on Earth.” Despite some modestly positive
around the world can use the power of the developments in the climate change arena,
internet to improve the long-term prospects current efforts are entirely insufficient to prevent
of their children and grandchildren. They can a catastrophic warming of Earth. Meanwhile,
insist on facts, and discount nonsense. They can the United States and Russia have embarked on
demand action to reduce the existential threat of massive programs to modernize their nuclear
nuclear war and unchecked climate change. They triads—thereby undermining existing nuclear
can seize the opportunity to make a safer and weapons treaties. “The clock ticks now at just
saner world. three minutes to midnight because international
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists § 16You can also read
