Liste der Veröffentlichungen des Think Tank des EP

 
CONTINUE READING
Liste der Veröffentlichungen des Think Tank des EP
Liste der Veröffentlichungen des Think Tank des EP
           https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank

                Suchkriterien für die Erstellung der Liste :

                         Sortierung Nach Datum ordnen
                     Schlagwortliste "Abholzung"

                              32 Ergebnisse

                     Erstellungsdatum : 19-06-2022
Minimising the risk of deforestation and forest degradation associated with products placed on the EU
market and exported from the EU
  Art der Veröffentlichung   Briefing
           Kalenderdatum     13-04-2022
                 Verfasser   VIKOLAINEN Vera
            Politikbereich   Ex-ante-Folgenabschätzung
           Schlagwortliste   Abholzung | Agro-Forstwirtschaft | Auswirkung auf die Umwelt | biologische Vielfalt | EU-Strategie | Waldbau
       Zusammenfassung       This briefing provides an initial analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the European Commission's impact
                             assessment (IA) accompanying the proposal for an EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global
                             deforestation, submitted on 17 November 2021 and referred to the European Parliament's Committee on Environment,
                             Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI). The proposal was first announced in the 2019 Commission communication on
                             Stepping up EU action to protect and restore the world's forests, and then confirmed in the European Green Deal, the
                             2030 EU biodiversity strategy and the 'farm to fork' strategy. On 22 October 2020, on the basis of an own-initiative
                             report, the European Parliament adopted a resolution, which was accompanied by a European added value
                             assessment. The resolution calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for an EU legal framework to halt and
                             reverse EU-driven global deforestation. Following up on this request, the Commission included the present proposal in
                             its 2021 work programme and the 2021 joint declaration on legislative priorities.
                  Briefing EN

Towards deforestation-free commodities and products in the EU
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Briefing
           Kalenderdatum
                       11-04-2022
                 Verfasser
                       HALLEUX Vivienne
            Politikbereich
                       Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Ausfuhr (EU) | Bioenergie | biologische Vielfalt | Holzprodukt | Kaffee | Kakao | pflanzliches Öl | Rind |
                       Rohstoffmarkt | Soja | Vorschlag (EU)
      Zusammenfassung On 17 November 2021, the European Commission tabled a legislative proposal aimed at curbing deforestation and
                       forest degradation driven by the expansion of agricultural land used to produce specific commodities, namely cattle,
                       cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soya and wood. Following up on a 2020 European Parliament resolution, which called for
                       regulatory action to tackle EU-driven global deforestation, the proposal would impose due diligence obligations on
                       operators placing these commodities and some derived products on the EU market, or exporting them from the EU.
                       Member States would be responsible for enforcement, and for setting penalties in case of non-compliance. To facilitate
                       due diligence and control, a benchmarking system would identify countries as presenting a low, standard or high risk of
                       producing non-compliant commodities or products. Obligations for operators and national authorities would vary
                       according to the level of risk assigned to the country of production. While generally supporting the proposal,
                       stakeholders have raised some issues, regarding for instance the commodities covered, the protection of human
                       rights, the impacts of the country benchmarking on trade relationships, and the role of third-party certification. In the
                       Parliament, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, responsible for the file, is expected to
                       consider its rapporteur's draft report in April 2022. Second edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are
                       updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
              Briefing EN

Internal and external dimension of illegal logging: legal issues and solutions
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Studie
           Kalenderdatum
                       03-11-2021
            Externe Autor
                       Dr. Kévine KINDJI
            Politikbereich
                       Menschenrechte | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Aktionsprogramm | Holzerzeugung | Holzgewinnung | Holzprodukt | illegaler Holzeinschlag | Korruption |
                       Menschenrechte | Schutzgebiet | Waldfläche
      Zusammenfassung This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional
                       Affairs at the request of the PETI Committee, aims at gaining deeper insights into the legal aspects of illegal logging
                       and related trade in illegally harvested timber and timber products. It analyses the legal requirements and their
                       implications for various actors in the EU and in third countries. The study examines the disparities in enforcement and
                       penalties regimes in Member States and analyses their role in trade diversion. The study further explores the
                       possibility for strengthening the timber regime by broadening its scope and tackling underlying issues such as
                       corruption and human rights violations. The study also assesses the external dimension, specifically focusing on the
                       Voluntary Partnership Agreements with major producers’ countries. The study formulates various recommendations to
                       improve the regime taking into account both the internal and external dimension of illegal logging.
                Studie EN

19-06-2022                                        Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                        1
Webinar proceedings: An EU legal framework to halt and reverse deforestation
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Briefing
           Kalenderdatum
                       27-11-2020
                 Verfasser
                       CIUCCI MATTEO
            Politikbereich
                       Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Agrar-Umweltmaßnahmen | dauerhafte Entwicklung | EU-Strategie | EU-Umweltpolitik | landwirtschaftliche
                       Erzeugung | nachhaltige Landwirtschaft | Schutz der Pflanzenwelt | Verbraucherinformation | Waldschutz
      Zusammenfassung On Thursday, 10 September 2020, the Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies
                       organised at the request of the ENVI committee a remote webinar on "An EU legal framework to halt and reverse
                       deforestation". This briefing summarises the presentations delivered by the invited experts.
              Briefing EN

Forest fires: Environmental stakes
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Briefing
           Kalenderdatum
                       19-11-2020
                 Verfasser
                       HALLEUX Vivienne
            Politikbereich
                       Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Auswirkung auf die Umwelt | biologische Vielfalt | Brandbekämpfung | EU-Umweltpolitik |
                       Klimaschutzpolitik | nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft | Schutz der Pflanzenwelt | Wald | Waldschutz
      Zusammenfassung Covering nearly one third of the land surface of the globe, forests make a wide range of direct and indirect
                       contributions to human well-being. Home to most of the world's terrestrial biodiversity, they also play an essential role
                       in climate change mitigation, removing about a quarter of the CO2 that human activities add to the atmosphere.
                       Worldwide, millions of hectares (ha) of forests and other types of vegetation burn every year. Fire dynamics are
                       shaped by a complex set of factors, including human activity and climate. While a warming and drying climate
                       increases the risk of fires, fires, by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, contribute in turn to global
                       warming. Forest fires that are not balanced by vegetation regrowth, i.e. fires used in the deforestation process, and
                       fires burning on carbon-rich peatlands are of particular concern. Fires also emit air pollutants, including particulate
                       matter, with adverse impacts on human health. Beyond emissions of particles and gases, forest fires can also affect
                       biodiversity and ecosystem conditions, and damage soils. The European Union (EU) has committed to protecting the
                       world's forests under several international agreements and initiatives, including the United Nations (UN) Convention on
                       Biological Diversity and the Paris Agreement on climate change. At EU level, funding is available to support forest fire
                       prevention and restorative measures, as well as research into fire risk management. The Union civil protection
                       mechanism can be called upon for help by any country in the world when national response capacities to fight fires are
                       overwhelmed. Under the European Green Deal, legislative and non-legislative measures are expected in the near
                       future to strengthen forest protection within and outside the EU. The European Parliament recently asked the
                       European Commission to propose an EU legal framework to tackle EU-driven global deforestation, based on
                       mandatory due diligence for companies placing forest- and ecosystem-risk commodities and derived products on the
                       EU market, with penalties in the event of non-compliance.
              Briefing EN
              Multimedia Forest fires: Environmental stakes

Amazon deforestation and EU-Mercosur deal
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 29-10-2020
                 Verfasser
                         GRIEGER Gisela
            Politikbereich
                         Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Internationaler Handel | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | Brasilien | Gemeinsamer Markt | Handelsabkommen (EU) | Klimaschutzpolitik | Mercosur | tropischer
                         Regenwald | Umweltschutz | Waldschutz | Wirtschaftsinstrument für die Umwelt
      Zusammenfassung After coming to a political agreement on the trade pillar of the three-pronged EU-Mercosur association agreement in
                         June 2019, the EU and the four founding members of Mercosur (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay) reached
                         agreement on the political dialogue and cooperation parts in July 2020. However, as environmental deregulation and
                         deforestation continue unabated in Brazil, opposition to the deal is growing. It is unlikely to be submitted to the
                         European Parliament for consent in its current form. A study of the trade pillar's provisions concludes that, taking the
                         risk of deforestation into account, the deal's environmental costs are likely to exceed its economic gains. This raises
                         doubts as to whether Brazil's compliance with its climate change commitments can realistically be achieved based on
                         provisions devoid of an effective enforcement mechanism.
         Auf einen Blick EN

19-06-2022                                      Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                             2
Plenary round-up – October II 2020
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 26-10-2020
                 Verfasser
                         FERGUSON CLARE | SOCHACKA KATARZYNA
            Politikbereich
                         Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Coronavirus | Demokratie in der EU, institutionelle und parlamentarische Rechte |
                         Umwelt
         Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Coronavirus-Erkrankung | Der Europäische Fonds für die Anpassung an die Globalisierung | Epidemie |
                         Europäisches Parlament | Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik | Gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik |
                         Haushaltsentlastung | künstliche Intelligenz | Parlamentsdebatte | Sitzungsperiode des Parlaments | Tagesordnung
      Zusammenfassung During the second October 2020 plenary session – the first at which Members were able to speak remotely, and not
                         only vote, from the Member States – the European Commission presented its 2021 work programme, which Members
                         largely welcomed. Members also discussed the conclusions of the 15 16 October 2020 European Council meeting, EU
                         measures to mitigate the social and economic impact of Covid 19, police brutality within the EU, the sale of EU
                         passports and visas to criminals, the State of the Energy Union and aligning the Energy Charter Treaty with the
                         European Green Deal. Parliament announced that its 2020 Sakharov Prize will be awarded on 16 December to the
                         Belarusian opposition, in particular the Coordinating Council, for 'an initiative launched by courageous women'.
         Auf einen Blick EN

How can international trade contribute to sustainable forestry and the preservation of the world’s forests
through the Green Deal?
  Art der Veröffentlichung   Eingehende Analyse
           Kalenderdatum     19-10-2020
            Externe Autor    Werner RAZA, Bernhard TRÖSTER, Bernhard WOLFSLEHNER, Markus KRAJEWSKI.
            Politikbereich   Internationaler Handel | Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste   Abholzung | biologische Vielfalt | internationaler Handel | nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft | Waldschutz
      Zusammenfassung High deforestation rates, particularly in tropical areas, remain a pressing concern for the international community, given
                        their impacts on the global climate and the loss of biodiversity. The EU has committed to promoting sustainable forest
                        management both domestically and internationally. However, efforts so far have concentrated on promoting the legality
                        of trade in timber and timber products, via policy instruments such as FLEGT and the EU Timber Regulation. EU trade
                        policy could be employed more systematically to promote sustainable forestry and deforestation-free value chains. The
                        report proposes eleven measures to this end, both at the unilateral, bilateral and multilateral level, that inter alia
                        combine market access incentives on the part of consumer markets such as the EU with obligations to promote
                        principles of sustainable production on the part of producer countries.
     Eingehende Analyse EN

EU-Rechtsrahmen zur Eindämmung und Umkehrung der von der EU verursachten weltweiten
Entwaldung
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 14-10-2020
                 Verfasser
                         HALLEUX Vivienne
            Politikbereich
                         Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | biologische Vielfalt | grüne Wirtschaft | illegaler Holzeinschlag | Klimaschutzpolitik | nachhaltige
                         Forstwirtschaft | nachhaltige Landwirtschaft | Umweltschutz | Waldschutz
      Zusammenfassung Der Verbrauch in der EU spielt eine entscheidende Rolle bei der weltweiten Entwaldung, die kein Ende nimmt und
                         erheblich zum Klimawandel und dem Verlust der Artenvielfalt beiträgt. Bei der Oktober-II-Plenartagung soll das
                         Parlament über einen legislativen Initiativbericht abstimmen, mit dem die Kommission aufgefordert wird, regulatorische
                         Schritte in diesem Bereich zu unternehmen und einen EU-Rechtsrahmen vorzuschlagen, der auf einer verpflichtenden
                         Sorgfaltsprüfung für Unternehmen beruht, die Produkte auf den EU-Markt bringen.
         Auf einen Blick ES, DE, EN, FR, IT, PL

19-06-2022                                         Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                     3
Forests in south-east Asia: Can they be saved?
  Art der Veröffentlichung   Briefing
           Kalenderdatum     11-09-2020
                 Verfasser   RUSSELL Martin
            Politikbereich   Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste   Abholzung | Forstpolitik | Klimaschutzpolitik | Südostasien | Umweltschutz | Wald
       Zusammenfassung       Nowhere in the world are forests shrinking faster than in south-east Asia. Rapid population growth and economic
                             development put intense pressure on the environment. Between 1990 and 2020, an area larger than Germany was
                             deforested, over half of it in Indonesia. Land clearing for agriculture is the main cause of deforestation. Driven by
                             booming global demand, oil palm plantations have spread into formerly forested land, especially in Indonesia and
                             Malaysia, which are the world's largest producers. Logging, much of it illegal, is also a serious threat to the region's
                             forests. Deforestation destroys the habitats of iconic large mammals such as the orang-utan and tiger, as well as
                             thousands of lesser-known, but still vital, animal and plant species; it also contributes to climate change. Smoke from
                             fires on forested and cleared land causes economic disruption and thousands of premature deaths. Worrying though
                             all this is, there are tentative signs of change. With international encouragement, south-east Asian governments are
                             becoming increasingly aware of the importance of balanced development. Significant efforts are being made to protect
                             forests and to make timber and palm oil production more sustainable. Perhaps reflecting such efforts, the pace of
                             deforestation in most countries has come down slightly since a mid-2010s peak. However, it is too early to say whether
                             this improvement can be sustained. The EU has played a leading role in helping south-east Asian countries to curb
                             deforestation, for example by helping them to tackle illegal logging. It has also revised its biofuels policy to ensure that
                             European demand for palm oil does not exacerbate the problem.
                  Briefing EN

An EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation: European added value
assessment
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 08-09-2020
              Verfasser EVAS Tatjana | HEFLICH ALEKSANDRA | NAVARRA Cecilia
          Politikbereich Internationaler Handel | Umwelt
         Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Einfuhr (EU) | Forschungsbericht | internationale Rolle der Union | Klimaveränderung | quantitative
                         Analyse | Schutz der Pflanzenwelt | Tropenholz | Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen | Waldschutz |
                         Wertschöpfung | Wirtschaftsanalyse
      Zusammenfassung Deforestation caused by agricultural activity is continuing at an alarming rate, threatening irreplaceable tropical forests
                         that, among other things, are crucial for fighting climate change. The EU bears its share of responsibility for this
                         environmental loss, as it is one of the major importers of several forest-risk commodities. To date, action has been
                         taken at different levels to stop commodity-driven deforestation. Nevertheless, the impact on forest loss has been low
                         as deforestation continues and new hot spots occur. There has been a recent commitment at EU level to propose new
                         measures to minimise the risk of deforestation and forest degradation associated with products placed on the EU
                         market. This European added value assessment (EAVA) accompanies the European Parliament's own-initiative
                         legislative report calling on the European Commission to take legislative action on the matter. The EAVA looks at why
                         EU action is needed and analyses four potential demand-side regulatory policy options at EU level. A quantitative
                         analysis reveals that to varying extents, all options have the potential to reduce EU-driven deforestation and
                         associated carbon emissions, while having a relatively small impact on the EU economy
                  Studie EN

EU development cooperation and ethical certification schemes: impact, transparency and traceability
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Studie
           Kalenderdatum
                       15-07-2020
            Externe Autor
                       Enrique URIBE LEITZ, François RUF
            Politikbereich
                       Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe | Internationaler Handel
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Aufforstung | Ausrichtung der Landwirtschaft | Forschungsbericht | Gütezeichen | Kakao | Kinderarbeit |
                       Rückverfolgbarkeit | Wertschöpfungskette
      Zusammenfassung ‘Transparency’, ‘Traceability’, ‘Sustainable standards’, ‘good agricultural practices’ and ‘zero-deforestation’ are all fine
                       terms which [alongside many others] have emerged in connection with the cocoa sector’s certification process. But
                       does the reality of this process justify using such terms? Our initial conclusions in this study, based on an analysis of
                       existing research over recent years, revealed that a considerable number of investigations had been commissioned by
                       the certification schemes themselves. Key findings presented by the various studies all conveyed a positive tone.
                       However, on closer inspection we felt that smallholders covered by the programmes were ‘following party lines’ rather
                       than speaking freely. This suspicion was well-founded. Having built up trust in the villages during several years of field-
                       work, we eventually gained access to exclusive data held by the cooperatives and certification programmes. We have
                       used this evidence in order to draw a comparison between the virtual world portrayed by certification schemes’
                       narrative and the real world being faced by cocoa producers. Certification schemes claim that they give a sense of
                       trust within the value chain, particularly in regard to produce traceability. They also claim to assist farmers, by way of
                       training, various inputs (fertilisers etc.) and credit schemes. In reality, these ‘advantages’ are not visible at farm level.
                       Budgets prepared by cooperatives to justify the use of premiums reflect structural flaws in certification and access to
                       information. Serious questions arise surrounding deforestation, child labour and the payment of premiums. Social
                       investment is minimal and consumers’ perception diverges from the reality. In conclusion, we make a number of key
                       proposals and suggestions based on stakeholders’ complaints and recommendations.
                Studie EN

19-06-2022                                          Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                             4
Challenges for environmental and indigenous peoples’ rights in the Amazon region
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                        Eingehende Analyse
           Kalenderdatum30-06-2020
            Externe Autor
                        Dr. Julian BURGER
            Politikbereich
                        Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe | Menschenrechte | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                        Abholzung | biologische Vielfalt | europäisches Unternehmen | Forschungsbericht | Menschenrechte |
                        Menschenrechtsbewegung | Schutzgebiet | soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen | tropischer Regenwald |
                        Urbevölkerung | ökologische Bewegung | übermäßige Nutzung der Ressourcen
      Zusammenfassung The present analysis examines the environmental and human rights challenges in the Amazon region. It finds that the
                        Amazonian countries pursue development policies in the region based on the exploitation on an industrial scale of
                        natural and non-renewable resources that have caused and continue to cause deforestation, loss of biodiversity and
                        engender human rights violations in particular affecting indigenous peoples. The analysis acknowledges the measures
                        taken by the Amazonian countries to establish protected areas and support indigenous territories and their rights but
                        concludes that the laws need strengthening and effective enforcement. The analysis argues that the protection of the
                        Amazon biome is an essential part of the global efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and concurs with the view of some
                        scientists that there is an urgency to stop forest loss. The analysis further notes that the most effective guardians of the
                        Amazonian forest and its biodiversity are its indigenous peoples. The analysis concludes by arguing that the European
                        Union has an interest in contributing to the protection of the Amazon and its indigenous peoples. It recommends,
                        among other things, that the EU strengthen its direct support to Amazonian indigenous peoples and environmental
                        defenders and develop effective measures which target EU-based companies whose activities cause deforestation.
     Eingehende Analyse EN

Brazil and the Amazon Rainforest: Deforestation, biodiversity and cooperation with the EU and
international forums
  Art der Veröffentlichung Eingehende Analyse
           Kalenderdatum 15-05-2020
           Externe Autor Cristina MÜLLER
           Politikbereich Umwelt
          Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Assoziationsabkommen (EU) | biologische Vielfalt | Brasilien | gemeinsame Handelspolitik |
                          Handelsbeziehungen | Mercosur | tropischer Regenwald | Umweltschutz | Waldschutz
      Zusammenfassung For the largest tropical rainforest on Earth, an aggravated forest fire and deforestation regime in Amazonia put at risk
                          the world’s richest biodiversity assets and a major climate regulator. For the EU27, it highlights the need to associate
                          the question of embodied deforestation consumption by placing deforestation-free supply chains at the centre of
                          negotiations surrounding the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement, given the volume of trade between these economic
                          blocs in meat, leather, soy, coffee, rubber, wood pulp, biofuel and timber.
     Eingehende Analyse EN

Amazon wildfire crisis: Need for an international response
  Art der Veröffentlichung   Briefing
           Kalenderdatum     29-11-2019
                 Verfasser   GOMEZ RAMIREZ Enrique
            Politikbereich   Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste   Abholzung | Bolivien | Brand | Brasilien | EU-Aktion | Naturkatastrophe | tropischer Regenwald
       Zusammenfassung       The Amazon rainforest, which is the largest ecosystem of its kind on Earth and is shared by eight South American
                             countries as well as an EU outermost region, was ravaged by fires coinciding with last summer’s dry season. However,
                             most of these fires are set intentionally and are linked to increased human activities in the area, such as the expansion
                             of agriculture and cattle farming, illegal logging, mining and fuel extraction. Although a recurrent phenomenon that has
                             been going on for decades, some governments' recent policies appear to have contributed to the increase in the
                             surface area burnt in 2019, in particular in Brazil and Bolivia. Worldwide media coverage of the fires, and international
                             and domestic protests against these policies have nevertheless finally led to some initiatives to seriously tackle the
                             fires, both at national and international level – such as the Leticia Pact for Amazonia. Finding a viable long-term
                             solution to end deforestation and achieve sustainable development in the region, requires that the underlying causes
                             are addressed and further action is taken at both national and international levels. The EU is making, and can
                             increase, its contribution by cooperating with the affected countries and by leveraging the future EU-Mercosur
                             Association Agreement to help systematic law enforcement action against deforestation. In addition, as the
                             environmental commitments made at the 2015 Conference of Parties (COP21) in Paris will have to be renewed in
                             2020, COP25 in December 2019 could help reach new commitments on forests.
                  Briefing EN
              Multimedia Threat to the Amazon rainforest needs an urgent response

19-06-2022                                         Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                           5
Using trade policy to tackle climate change
  Art der Veröffentlichung   Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum     08-10-2019
                 Verfasser   TITIEVSKAIA Jana
            Politikbereich   Internationaler Handel
           Schlagwortliste   Abholzung | Handelsabkommen | Klimaveränderung | Umweltschutz
       Zusammenfassung       The recent forest fires in the Amazon highlight the need for greater measures worldwide to attenuate tensions between
                             resource needs, for example mining or grazing, that cause deforestation. European leaders have called for urgent
                             action, including through trade policy. Policy-makers argue, for instance, for leveraging the negotiated European Union
                             (EU)-Mercosur Trade Agreement to achieve compliance with the Paris Agreement. Since the Paris Agreement is
                             binding only in part and aspirational concerning national emissions targets, there are calls to resort to trade policy
                             instead.
          Auf einen Blick EN

India: environmental issues
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Briefing
           Kalenderdatum
                       10-04-2019
                 Verfasser
                       D'AMBROGIO Enrico
            Politikbereich
                       Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abfallwirtschaft | Abholzung | Armut | dauerhafte Entwicklung | erneuerbare Energie | Indien | Klimaveränderung |
                       Luftqualität | Urbanisierung | Wasserverschmutzung
      Zusammenfassung The entire south Asian region is threatened by climate change. Changes in average weather conditions are likely to
                       create hotspots across the region and have negative impacts on living standards and gross domestic product (GDP).
                       India is at the core of this trend: it ranks 14th in the last United Nations global climate risk index and in 2017 it was the
                       second most-affected country in terms of casualties related to extreme weather. Air quality in Indian cities is quickly
                       deteriorating and it is today worse than the situation in China: in the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) global
                       ambient air quality database, 11 of the 12 cities with the highest levels of small particulate – PM2.5 – are located in
                       India. Air pollution goes hand in hand with poverty: in 2016 an estimated 790 million people (almost 60 % of the Indian
                       population), still relied on biomass for cooking. Deforestation, water pollution, clean water shortages, and waste
                       management are further issues of concern. The Indian authorities have taken several initiatives to tackle these issues.
                       In 2008, the first national plan on climate change (NAPCC) outlined eight 'national missions' running up to 2017. India
                       is a leader in the implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. It is a founding member of the
                       International Solar Alliance and has ambitious targets in terms of solar power energy. It has launched a national clean
                       air programme (NCAP) to combat air pollution. Prime Minister's Narendra Modi government has launched several
                       flagship initiatives on environment, including a clean cooking scheme, Clean India, Clean Ganga, and Smart Cities
                       Mission. The EU supports Delhi's efforts on tackling its environment challenges. At their March 2016 summit, the EU
                       and India agreed on two joint declarations: on an India-EU water partnership and on a clean energy and climate
                       partnership. The joint declaration on partnership for smart and sustainable urban development signed at the India-EU
                       Summit in October 2017 is the framework for EU support for India's urbanisation challenges.
              Briefing EN

Palm oil: economic and environmental impacts
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 16-02-2018
                 Verfasser
                         RUSSELL Martin
            Politikbereich
                         Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Umwelt | Wirtschaft und Währung
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | Bodennutzung | dauerhafte Entwicklung | Klimaveränderung | Malaysia | Mitgliedstaat der EU |
                         nachhaltige Landwirtschaft | Nahrungsmittel | Palmnuss | tropischer Regenwald
      Zusammenfassung Economical and versatile, palm oil has become the world's most widely used vegetable oil. However, its production
                         comes at a heavy environmental cost, especially in Indonesia and Malaysia, the two main producers. Efforts to make
                         its production more sustainable still have a long way to go.
         Auf einen Blick EN

What if all our meat were grown in a lab?
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 17-01-2018
                 Verfasser
                         KURRER CHRISTIAN MARTIN
            Politikbereich
                         Forschungspolitik | Industrie | Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Lebensmittelsicherheit | Umwelt
                         | Vorausplanung
         Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Antibiotikum | Auswirkung auf die Umwelt | Eiweiß-Substitut | EU-Umweltpolitik | Fleischerzeugnis |
                         Fleischindustrie | Nahrungsmittelerzeugung | Treibhausgas | Viehhaltung | wissenschaftliche Forschung
      Zusammenfassung Laboratory meat is grown from a small number of cells taken from a live animal and placed in a growth medium in a
                         bioreactor where they proliferate independently. If meat cultured in this way became widely available, it could
                         significantly alleviate the environmental problems currently caused by livestock production - such as greenhouse gas
                         emissions and nitrogen pollution of waterways - without requiring humans to alter their consumption patterns. This
                         publication provides an overview of the potential impacts of laboratory meat on environment, public health and farming,
                         and makes suggestions for anticipatory policy-making in this area.
         Auf einen Blick EN
              Multimedia What if all our meat were grown in a lab?

19-06-2022                                         Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                             6
Transparent and Accountable Management of Natural Resources in Developing Countries: The Case of
Forests
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 31-05-2017
            Externe Autor - Peter MINANG, Principal Scientist, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and ASB Partnership for The Tropical Forest
                            Margins), Kenya;
                            - Lalisa DUGUMA, Scientist, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and ASB Partnership for The Tropical Forest
                            Margins), Kenya;
                            - Florence BERNARD, Associate scientist, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kenya and
                            - Judith NZYOKA, Assistant Scientist, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and ASB Partnership for The Tropical Forest
                            Margins), Kenya
            Politikbereich Bewertung von Rechtsvorschriften und politischen Maßnahmen in der Praxis | Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe |
                            Internationaler Handel | Regionale Entwicklung | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Aufschlüsselung der EU-Finanzierung | biologische Vielfalt | Biomasse | Bodennutzung | dauerhafte
                            Entwicklung | Drittland | Entwicklungshilfe | Finanzhilfe | Holzindustrie | nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft | Treibhausgas |
                            Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen | Wald | Waldschutz
       Zusammenfassung This study reviewed the state of transparency and accountability in the forestry sector in developing countries focusing
                            on contributions of EU actions and provisions on the same. The study was based on review of literature, policies and
                            reports on forest governance, using three FLEGT-VPA case study countries, namely Cameroon, Ghana and Tanzania.
                            More than 200 million Euros have been invested into FLEGT-VPA and related activities around Africa with positive
                            impacts on transparency, accountability and overall governance. Less impact is elicited regarding benefits to local
                            people and FLEGT interactions with other mechanisms such as REDD+. More importantly, little evidence exists on
                            direct evidence of FLEGT-VPA processes incentivizing sustainable forest management even though there is some
                            evidence of growth in legal timber export numbers. Recommendations for improving FLEGT –VPA include, expanding
                            the definition of “legality” to include safeguards that ensure community rights and benefits; strengthening EU-China
                            FLEGT-VPA initiatives to enable comparable standards for African timber; including small scale and agroforestry-
                            based domestic timber into the EU Timber Regulation (EUTR); increasing capacity building and synergy with other
                            mechanisms such as REDD+. Opportunities for new EU policies and actions include FLEGT-type monitoring for forest-
                            related SDGs and incentives for actions in the New York Declaration on Forests.
                     Studie EN

Improving global value chains key for EU trade
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Briefing
           Kalenderdatum
                       13-06-2016
                 Verfasser
                       BINDER Krisztina
            Politikbereich
                       Internationaler Handel
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Agro-Industrie | Arbeitsbedingungen | dauerhafte Entwicklung | Entwicklungsland | gemeinsame
                       Handelspolitik | Gleichheit von Mann und Frau | internationales Arbeitsrecht | nachhaltige Landwirtschaft |
                       Produktionspolitik | soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen | Textilindustrie | Ursprungserzeugnis
      Zusammenfassung Global value chains, and the related trade in intermediate goods and services, dominate today's interconnected
                       economy. Tragic events, such as the collapse of the Rana Plaza garment factory in 2013, have shed new light on the
                       operation of these chains. Pressure is mounting on the various stakeholders involved at both national and international
                       levels to prevent and mitigate the risks of the adverse effects linked to their functioning. Although a number of
                       promising initiatives have been launched and some improvements have been made, much remains to be done.
                       Promotion of sustainability and responsible management of global value chains figure prominently on the agendas of
                       organisations such as the United Nations (UN), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
                       and the International Labour Organization (ILO). The EU also plays a part. One of the main objectives of the EU is to
                       integrate sustainability, with its various economic, social and environmental dimensions, into all relevant internal
                       policies and external action. Against this backdrop and building on its ongoing initiatives, existing policy frameworks
                       and instruments, the EU is and has been encouraging efforts to promote sustainable value chains. How best to
                       address this challenge is key to the EU's new trade and investment strategy 'Trade for all'. The new European
                       Commission initiatives currently under development, such as the EU Garment Initiative and the EU Action Plan on
                       Responsible Business Conduct, and the Council conclusions of May 2016 on Responsible Global Value Chains are in
                       line with this endeavour.
              Briefing EN

Brazil's ambitions in climate change policy
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 03-12-2015
                 Verfasser
                         LAZAROU Eleni
            Politikbereich
                         Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | Außenpolitik | Brasilien | Energieversorgung | institutionelle Struktur | internationales Treffen |
                         Klimaveränderung | Rahmenübereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über Klimaänderungen | Treibhausgas |
                         Umweltpolitik | Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen
      Zusammenfassung Brazil plays an active role in international climate change negotiations. Its success record on deforestation has made it
                         a leader in the reduction of carbon emissions. Ahead of the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United
                         Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Brazil made commitments to reduce emissions
                         considerably by 2025.
         Auf einen Blick EN

19-06-2022                                       Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                           7
Developments in international climate policy
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 01-07-2015
                 Verfasser
                         ERBACH Gregor
            Politikbereich
                         Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | Ausarbeitung des EU-Rechts | Ausschussbericht | China | Gipfeltreffen | Gruppe der am stärksten
                         industrialisierten Länder | Internationale Energie-Agentur | internationale Verhandlungen | Klimaveränderung |
                         Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen | von Menschen verursachte Katastrophe
      Zusammenfassung UN climate talks in Bonn made only slow progress in negotiations towards a new international climate agreement,
                         although a deal was reached to protect forests with a view to mitigating climate change. More than 40 countries have
                         submitted pledges for post-2020 climate action. Meanwhile, the G7 called for global decarbonisation within this
                         century, the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that global energy-related emissions could peak by 2020, Pope
                         Francis issued an encyclical addressing climate issues, and medical experts highlighted the health benefits of climate
                         action. The EU and China agreed to step up their cooperation on climate issues. The European Parliament's
                         Environment Committee has been discussing an own-initiative report on the climate negotiations.
         Auf einen Blick EN

ASEAN: building a Socio-Cultural Community
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 03-12-2014
                 Verfasser
                         RUSSELL Martin
            Politikbereich
                         Auswärtige Angelegenheiten
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | Annäherung der Politiken | ASEAN | ASEAN-Staaten | dauerhafte Entwicklung | Klimaschutzpolitik |
                         kulturelle Identität | Luftqualität | nachhaltige Forstwirtschaft | soziale Sicherheit | umweltpolitische Zusammenarbeit |
                         Wanderarbeitnehmer | Zivilgesellschaft | Zusammenarbeit im Bildungswesen
      Zusammenfassung In 2007 the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) launched a Socio-Cultural Community as one of three
                         pillars (the other two being the Economic and Political-Security Communities) comprising the ASEAN Community, to
                         be completed by 2015. This represented a new departure for ASEAN, which in the past has cooperated mainly on
                         security and economic matters. To date, however, progress on the Socio-Cultural Community has been limited.
         Auf einen Blick EN

The Development of Climate Negotiations in View of Lima (COP 20)
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                       Studie
           Kalenderdatum
                       24-11-2014
            Externe Autor
                       Anke Herold, Anne Siemons, Martin Cames and Margarethe Scheffler (Öko-Institut e.V.)
            Politikbereich
                       Umwelt | Vorausplanung
           Schlagwortliste
                       Abholzung | Australien | Brasilien | China | die Russische Föderation | die Vereinigte Staaten | Finanzierungsart |
                       Indien | internationale Verhandlungen | Japan | Klimaschutzpolitik | Mexiko | Peru | Rahmenübereinkommen der
                       Vereinten Nationen über Klimaänderungen | Südafrika | Treibhausgas | Umweltüberwachung
      Zusammenfassung This report provides an overview of the development of the negotiations within the UNFCCC since COP 19 in Warsaw.
                       It summarises the key developments in 2014 and provides short overviews for all negotiation areas. The overview also
                       includes a state of play of the Doha Climate Gateway and explains the position of the main Parties and negotiation
                       groups. It is supplemented by short overviews for individual countries and stakeholder groups.
                       This study was provided by Policy Department A for the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
                       (ENVI).
                Studie EN

Expectations for the Durban climate change conference
  Art der Veröffentlichung
                         Auf einen Blick
           Kalenderdatum 11-11-2011
                 Verfasser
                         TALBERG Anita
            Politikbereich
                         Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste
                         Abholzung | dauerhafte Entwicklung | Finanzierung | Forschung und Entwicklung | internationale Konferenz |
                         Klimaveränderung | multilaterale Beziehungen | Technologietransfer | Umweltverschlechterung | Verringerung der
                         Emissionen von Treibhausgasen
      Zusammenfassung From 28 November to 9 December 2011, 195 nations will meet in Durban, South Africa, for the 17th Conference of the
                         Parties (COP17) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
         Auf einen Blick EN

19-06-2022                                       Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                              8
The development of climate negotiations in view of Cancun (COP 16)
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 15-11-2010
            Externe Autor Anke Herold, Martin Cames and Vanessa Cook (Oeko-Institut e.V. - Institute for Applied Ecology, Freiburg-Darmstadt-
                            Berlin, Germany)
            Politikbereich Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe | Umwelt | Verkehr
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Beförderung auf dem Seeweg | Bodennutzung | Entwicklungsland | internationale Verhandlungen |
                            Luftverkehr | Umweltrecht | Umweltschutz | Umweltüberwachung | Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen
       Zusammenfassung This report provides an overview of the development of the negotiations within the UNFCCC since COP 15 in
                            Copenhagen. It summarises the key developments in 2010 and provides short overviews for all negotiation areas. The
                            overview also includes a state of play of the Copenhagen Accord and explains the position of the main Parties and
                            negotiation groups. It is supplemented by short overviews for individual countries and stakeholder groups.
                     Studie EN

The Challenge of Deterioration of Agricultural Land in the EU and in Particular in Southern Europe
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 15-09-2009
            Externe Autor José Arnáez (University of La Rioja, Spain), C. Kosmas and O. Kairis (Agricultural University of Athens, Greece) and
                            Maria da Conceição Gonçalves (Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, Portugal)
            Politikbereich Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Bodenschutz | Erosion | landwirtschaftliche Nutzfläche | landwirtschaftlicher Wasserbau | Südeuropa |
                            übermäßige Nutzung der Ressourcen
       Zusammenfassung Soil degradation is a natural process accelerated by human activities and involves both the physical loss (erosion) and
                            the reduction in quality of topsoil associated with nutrient decline and contamination. It has been caused by a number
                            of factors many of which are tied to human development as deforestation, overexploitation, overgrazing, and
                            industrialization. They have both localised and widespread impacts and affect soil quality for agriculture.
                            This study aims to present the current situation of the European agricultural land and examine the possible options to
                            stop or recover soil degradation.
                     Studie EN

Briefing Note on UNFCCC – COP 14 in Poznan (December 2008)
  Art der Veröffentlichung Eingehende Analyse
           Kalenderdatum 14-11-2008
            Externe Autor Noriko Fujiwara (Research Fellow Centre for European Policy Studies - CEPS, Brussels, Belgium)
                           with the contribution of Monica Alessi (CEPS), Christian Egenhofer (CEPS) and Anton Georgiev (CEPS)
            Politikbereich Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Bodennutzung | Forstpolitik | internationales Treffen | Klimaveränderung | Konvention UNO |
                           Technologietransfer | umweltpolitische Zusammenarbeit | Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen
       Zusammenfassung Executive summary
                           Ahead of the Poznań Conference (COP14, CMP4) in December there are four key issues or ‘hot topics’: i) sectoral
                           approaches; ii) Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF); iii)
                           Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries (REDD); and iv) financing and development. [...]
     Eingehende Analyse EN

19-06-2022                                       Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                             9
Biofuels sustainability criteria. Relevant issues to the proposed directive on the promotion of the use of
energy from renewable sources {COM(2008) 30 final}
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 16-06-2008
            Externe Autor Francis X. Johnson and Mikael Roman with contributions from Roel Hammerschlag, Carrie Lee and Adriaan Tas
                            (Stockholm Environment Institute)
            Politikbereich Energie | Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Biokraftstoff | Biomasse | Bodennutzung | dauerhafte Entwicklung | Treibhausgas
       Zusammenfassung The role envisioned for liquid biofuels for transport has come under increased scrutiny in the past year or two, due to
                            the potential social and environmental impacts associated with scaling up biofuels production and use from its low
                            level—currently representing about 1% of transport fuels globally. The proposed EU Directive setting a target of 10%
                            biofuels in transport sector by 2020 has therefore raised a number of concerns. The concerns about sustainability are
                            addressed within the proposed Directive through criteria related mainly to GHG emissions, but also to biodiversity and
                            other environmental impacts.
                            The use of first generation biofuels in temperate climates is land-intensive and inefficient in technical terms, whereas
                            first generation biofuels in tropical climates and second generation biofuels in general—offer a much more effective
                            use of land resources. The use of GHG reduction criteria can provide incentives for producers to rely on the most
                            productive feedstocks when sourcing biofuels for the EU market, which will often mean import of biofuels. A threshold
                            of 50% or more would tend to eliminate many of the first generation biofuels produced in temperate climates.
                            Member States should be encouraged to link financial incentives to the GHG reduction capabilities. Moreover, such
                            incentives could be better linked to development cooperation in the case of imports, so as to insure that Least
                            Developed Countries (i.e. in Africa) can gain access to larger markets rather than only the major producers such as
                            Brazil.
                            The calculation of GHG emissions associated with biofuels is complicated by the addition of factors associated with
                            land use change, since the GHG impacts of land use change are beset by uncertainty both in physical terms as well as
                            in the attribution of particular changes to production of particular biofuels. A further complication is introduced when
                            indirect land use changes are incorporated, since these occur through combinations of mar
                     Studie EN

climate change–induced water stress and its impact on natural and managed ecosystems
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 07-01-2008
            Externe Autor Jason Anderson (ed.), Kathryn Arblaster, Justin Bartley, Tamsin Cooper,
                            Marianne Kettunen (IEEP)
                            Timo Kaphengst, Anna Leipprand, Cornelius Laaser, Katharina
                            Umpfenbach (Ecologic)
                            Esko Kuusisto, Ahti Lepistö, Maria Holmberg (SYKE)
            Politikbereich Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Klimaveränderung | landwirtschaftlicher Wasserbau | Wald | Wasserressourcen | Ökosystem
                     Studie EN

Climate change impacts on Developing Countries - EU Accountability
  Art der Veröffentlichung Studie
           Kalenderdatum 21-11-2007
            Externe Autor Fulco Ludwig, Catharien Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Jan
                            Verhagen, Bart Kruijt, Ekko van Ierland, Rob Dellink,
                            Karianne de Bruin, Kelly de Bruin and Pavel Kabat.
                            Wageningen University and Research Centre
            Politikbereich Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe | Umwelt
           Schlagwortliste Abholzung | Armut | Entwicklungshilfe | Entwicklungsland | Entwicklungspolitik | Klimaveränderung | saubere
                            Technologie | Verringerung der Emissionen von Treibhausgasen
                     Studie EN

19-06-2022                                       Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP                                                          10
You can also read