Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric - Summary: City of Lubbock

Page created by Erik Hoffman
 
CONTINUE READING
Summary:
Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric
Primary Credit Analyst:
Scott W Sagen, New York (1) 212-438-0272; scott.sagen@spglobal.com

Secondary Contact:
Theodore A Chapman, Dallas (1) 214-871-1401; theodore.chapman@spglobal.com

Table Of Contents

Rationale

Outlook

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                 JULY 11, 2018 1
Summary:
Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric
Credit Profile
US$94.035 mil elec lt and pwr sys rev bnds ser 2018 dtd 08/01/2018 due 04/15/2048
  Long Term Rating                                      AA-/Negative                         New

Lubbock retail elec

  Long Term Rating                                      AA-/Negative                         Outlook Revised

Rationale
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to negative from stable and assigned its 'AA-' rating to Lubbock, Texas' $94
million series 2018 electric light and power system revenue bonds. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AA-' rating on
the system's parity electric system revenue bonds. The system does business as Lubbock Power & Light (LP&L).

The negative outlook reflects our view that the utility's 1.17x-1.24x fixed-charge coverage has been weak for the rating.
In addition, management's financial projections indicate a decline in fixed-charge coverage to below 1.2x from fiscal
years 2020 through 2022. Our fixed-charge coverage reflects our view that the utility's capacity payments to other
generation owners are vehicles for funding the suppliers' recovery of their investments in generation assets serving
LP&L. However, the utility has potential to transition to a new business model in 2021, which could enhance financial
stability in future years because of the additional transmission revenue stream. It plans to grow its transmission
business, which will provide access to higher returns that could bolster financial margins. LP&L is also exploring
reducing its energy supply function role by allowing about 70% of its customers to select alternative energy providers.
This latter proposal would maintain the distribution function that conveys electricity to its customers but would
sharply reduce its obligation for securing energy supply and paying demand and capacity charges to others, which
could strengthen the fixed-charge coverage ratio. Because it will be several years before the utility can realize the
benefits of the customer choice and transmission investment strategies, we could lower the rating if its fixed-charge
coverage metrics remain weak in the interim.

In addition, we have affirmed our 'AA-' rating on LP&L, based on our opinion of its general creditworthiness, including:

• The 2010 agreement that effectively ended the door-to-door competition between LP&L and an investor-owned
  utility that had been in place since 1942, making LP&L the sole retail electric provider to virtually the entire service
  area, which translates into a more secure and predictable revenue stream and allows LP&L to have more certainty
  regarding long-term planning;

• The city's strong regional economy, anchored by higher education and health care, and the system's competitive
  weighted average system electric rates based on relative customer classes' revenue contributions;

• The utility's low-risk operations as a principally distribution utility that sources its customers' energy needs under a
  full-requirements purchased power agreement (PPA) through 2019 with Southwestern Public Service Co. (SPS), a
  subsidiary of Xcel Energy, which is also LP&L's former competitor;

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                  JULY 11, 2018 2
Summary: Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

• The planned integration of 70% of the utility's load to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) power grid
  by June 1, 2021, and the board's plans to study the feasibility of migrating customers to alternative energy providers
  and exiting the power supply business for the LP&L customers within the ERCOT footprint, but maintaining this
  role for the 30% of customers within the SPS footprint;

• Our belief that LP&L will face limited potential for stranded costs because of its modest generation assets; and

• Good liquidity position, because although liquidity levels are projected to decline through the financial forecast, we
  believe days' cash equal to at least 110 days' cash will be maintained through fiscal 2024.

In our view, these credit strengths are partially offset, in part, by the system's:

• Low fixed-charge coverage metrics for the rating level equal to roughly 1.2x in fiscal years 2017 and 2016; and

• Additional debt needs as an approved transmission owner in the ERCOT market that is projected to more than
  double its debt burden by fiscal 2020 to a moderately-high $4,030 per customer.

The bonds are secured by a first-lien pledge on the net revenues of LP&L's electric system. We understand series 2018
bond proceeds will fund primarily transmission-related capital projects, distribution projects, and customer information
systems. The system has not entered into any direct-purchase bank debt.

A business profile score of '4' on a '10'-point scale, with '1' being the strongest and '10' the weakest, reflects the
system's position as a full-requirements PPA through 2019 with SPS, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy, which we believe
limits operational risk. In addition, electric rates remain competitive when compared to the state average. The system's
planned integration to ERCOT by June 2021 will likely lower capacity costs but also drive the capital program with
significant transmission projects accounting for the majority of total needs.

LP&L is in the Southwest Power Pool, a regional transmission operator that serves all or portions of 14 states,
including the Texas Panhandle. Currently LP&L is a full-requirements customer of SPS by way of the city's
participation in West Texas Municipal Power Agency (WTMPA), a joint-action agency that derives 95% of its revenues
from the city. WTMPA's total requirements contract expires in May 2019.

On April 9, 2018, LP&L's signed order from the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) was finalized to proceed with
its integration into the ERCOT market by June 1, 2021. The majority of LP&L's customer base (70%) will transition
from the Southwest Power Pool to ERCOT by 2021.

If the city opts into retail competition following the board's feasibility study, we understand that LP&L plans to revise
its business model and operate as a transmission and distribution utility for the ERCOT portion of its system. LP&L
would continue to serve the 30% of its load that will remain in the Southwest Power Pool, but competitive energy
providers could begin to meet the needs of customers in the retail competition area by 2021. Under this scenario,
management projects LP&L will shed purchased power costs and related capacity costs beginning in fiscal 2021, but
weaker financial metrics are projected primarily due to planned one-time hold harmless payments to SPS totaling $24
million.

If the utility chooses to opt into retail competition, it is our understanding that the retail electric providers (REP) will
remit transmission and distribution charges they have collected on LP&L's behalf to LP&L on a monthly basis. In order

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                     JULY 11, 2018 3
Summary: Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

to ensure timely payment to LP&L each REP must meet certain financial standards of the Texas Public Utility
Commission (PUC) applicable to electric service providers. It is currently unclear what those standards entail as
contracts have yet to be entered in to.

In an opt-in scenario, officials believe LP&L will not be selected as the provider of last resort. Should no other provider
step-in for that role and LP&L is selected as the POLR we do not consider it to be a credit concern because we believe
LP&L would pass through the costs of market power to these customers. We expect limited potential for stranded
costs totaling an estimated $4.2 million in fiscal 2021 because of LP&L's modest generation assets. We believe LP&L
could recover these costs by issuing debt or through its rates. It is also important to note that LP&L fully pays off its
SPS debt in April 2020 before the planned integration to the ERCOT power grid.

LP&L currently has 112 megawatts (MW) of dependable natural gas-fired generation, with 112 MW anticipated to be
available in 2019 for load requirements. Officials project the city will require an estimated 626 MW of total generation
in 2019 for load requirements. LP&L has a bilateral agreement directly with SPS, beginning in June 2019, to become a
partial requirements customer for 170 MW through 2044. LP&L through its participation in WTMPA entered into a
PPA with Elk City II Wind LLC for 96 MW of wind energy from June 2019 through May 2032. In addition, it entered
into a capacity and energy scheduling contract with SPS for 400 MW from June 2019 through May 2021 that will allow
LP&L to purchase most of its energy needs from the Southwest Power Pool Integrated Marketplace.

Management's current financial projections indicate a declining trend in fixed-charge coverage to below 1.2x from
fiscal years 2020 through 2022, reversing the recent improvement in fixed-charge coverage since fiscal 2014 to an
anticipated 1.3x projected for fiscal 2018. However, we note management's conservative assumptions included in its
financial forecast could result in better-than-projected results. The potential decline in fixed-charge coverage in fiscal
2021 reflects one-time hold harmless payments to SPS in 2021 related to the utility's planned integration to the
ERCOT power grid for a portion of its load.

LP&L's transmission revenue stream beginning in fiscal 2021 and totaling an estimated $36 million by fiscal 2022 will
provide additional revenue diversity and predictability because all of the ERCOT area's transmission system users will
essentially be LP&L's transmission customers. Transmission rates are approved by the PUC and are based on a
transmission cost-of-service filing that includes a return on investment. Also, the regulatory framework socializes the
transmission system's costs and the return across the nearly statewide system.

We consider LP&L's financial position just adequate at the current rating level and it is strengthened by a good
liquidity position that we believe to be sustainable. Following a 5.75% rate increase, fixed-charge coverage was a
still-low 1.24x in fiscal 2017, equal to its metric in fiscal 2016 and an improvement from just below 1.2x in fiscal years
2015 and 2014. Following a 5% rate increase, officials project to maintain an improved 1.3x for fiscal 2018 and a good
1.3x in fiscal 2019. Fixed-charge coverage is S&P Global Ratings' internally adjusted debt service coverage calculation
that treats fixed demand charges as if they were on-balance-sheet debt and general fund transfers as if they were part
of operating expenses.

We consider the system's liquidity position to be a credit strength, steadily improving to $67 million, or a strong 125
days' cash on hand in fiscal 2017. Although management forecasts declines in liquidity as it cash funds certain hold

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                  JULY 11, 2018 4
Summary: Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

harmless payments, we believe levels will remain good, equal to at least 110 days' cash on hand through fiscal 2024.

According to the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration (EIA), LP&L's weighted average electric
system rate competitiveness (based on relative customer classes' revenue contributions) is a competitive 89.4% of the
state average in 2016, the most recent year of available comparative data. We also note that residential rates are 7.6%
below the state average while commercial rates are 13.9% below it. Management raised utility base rates 5% in
October 2017 (lower than the 5.75% originally projected). In addition, the financial forecast no longer includes a rate
increase in 2018. The proposed new flat residential rate will change the seasonal fixed energy costs to an annual rate
meant to lower customers' bills in the summer.

We will continue to monitor LP&L's planned integration to ERCOT; decisions supporting consistent financial
performance, including rate adjustments, will also play a part. Management has in place, and automatically
semi-annually adjusts its fuel/purchased power cost adjustor with any power cost recovery also absorbed by a rate
stabilization reserve. Management still reserves the right to implement a pass-through adjustment outside of the
automatic semi-annual adjustments should LP&L become under-recovered beyond its target level.

A debt service reserve fund in the amount of average annual debt service provides additional liquidity; however, a
surety policy can be used to satisfy the reserve fund requirement, a new provision as of 2013. Also introduced in the
2013 master resolution was a revision to additional bonds language to a historical 1.1x maximum annual debt service
(MADS) coverage test. A rate increase implemented within 60 days of the bond issuance may be permitted to be
applied to projected revenues to meet the additional bonds test. There is no change to the sufficiency rate covenant.

The system's debt burden will rapidly increase to moderately high levels in 2020 because it plans to issue a combined
$267 million in additional debt related to constructing transmission assets in 2019 and 2020. The system's debt burden
will increase to an estimated $4,030 per customer in 2020 from just $1,214 per customer in 2017. Following the series
2018 debt issue, the system will support $196 million in total debt, including general obligation (GO) or certificates of
obligation debt. LP&L's six-year capital improvement plan (CIP) has identified about $387 million in total projects
through fiscal 2024; the bulk of identified projects are transmission-related and occur in 2019 and 2020. LP&L intends
to debt finance the majority of its current CIP.

LP&L currently serves 105,788 metered accounts. The city, home to approximately 249,042 people, is in west Texas
and acts as a regional trade and service center for a 25-county region with a population of about 600,000. The city's
economy includes strong education and health care sectors. Lubbock's economy is anchored by Texas Tech
University, which has an estimated enrollment of 35,000 and is the city's largest employer with approximately 9,000
employees. In our opinion, median household income levels are adequate at 85% of the national level in 2017, in part
reflecting the large student population. LP&L is not reliant on any of its principal customers for operating revenues,
with its 10 leading customers accounting for a diverse 16% of total revenues in fiscal 2017.

Outlook
The negative outlook reflects our view of the utility's historically weak fixed-charge coverage at the current rating with
the expectation of weak fixed-charge coverage levels over the next five years. If the utility's fixed-charge coverage

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                 JULY 11, 2018 5
Summary: Lubbock, Texas; Retail Electric

metrics decline as projected in the near term and remain an outlier for the current rating, we could lower the rating.
Over the long term, we believe the utility's transmission investments integrated into the ERCOT power grid will
provide for an attractive rate of return and could improve financial metrics.

Downside scenario
We could lower the rating if fixed-charge coverage metrics do not strengthen during the two-year outlook horizon. The
utility has the potential to strengthen financial metrics as the business model evolves and it sheds demand and
capacity charges that erode fixed-charge coverage while adding transmission assets that can garner strong returns.
However, it will be several years until this transition is complete.

Upside scenario
We could revise the outlook to stable if the utility's 2018 and 2019 financial performance strengthens. In addition, we
view the utility's potential opt-in scenario as a net positive because it could provide more stable revenues, as it
removes the risk of providing the power supply function to a portion of its customer base and invest in its transmission
business, which should improve financial margins over the long term.

Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors,
have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria.
Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is
available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found
on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left
column.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                  JULY 11, 2018 6
Copyright © 2018 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be
modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of
Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or
availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use
of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM
FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY
SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive,
special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by
negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact.
S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any
investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The
Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making
investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from
sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P
reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the
assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result,
certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the
confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate
its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com
and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional
information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.

WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT                                                                                                                JULY 11, 2018 7
You can also read