Battery and Precious Metals in a Premier US Mining District - TSX.V: PGE | OTC: PGEZF - Group Ten Metals
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
TSX.V: PGE | OTC: PGEZF March 4, 2021
Battery and Precious Metals in a Premier US Mining District
Platreef-Style PGE-Ni-Cu-Co + Au
High-Grade Au
TSX: PGE.V
Stillwater District, USA 1 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Forward-Looking Statements
Forward-Looking Information
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements that reflect the current views and/or expectations of Group Ten Metals Inc. (the “Company” or “Group Ten Metals”) with respect to its business and future events including statements
regarding its exploration plans and the Company’s expectations respecting future exploration results, the markets for the minerals underlying the Company’ projects, and growth strategies. Forward-looking statements are based on the then-
current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts about the business and the markets in which the Company operates. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including: the
inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drill results and other exploration data, the uncertainties respecting historical resource estimates, the potential for delays in
exploration or development activities, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits, the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations, accidents, equipment
breakdowns, title and permitting matters, labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in operations, fluctuating metal prices, unanticipated costs and expenses, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of
financing needed in the future and regulatory restrictions, including environmental regulatory restrictions. These risks, as well as others, including those set forth in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators, could cause actual results
and events to vary significantly. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information, or the material factors or assumptions used to
develop such forward looking information, will prove to be accurate. The Company does not undertake any obligations to release publicly any revisions for updating any voluntary forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable
securities law.
Technical Information
The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed by the following non-independent qualified persons (as defined in NI 43-101): (a) in respect of the Stillwater West Project, Mike Ostensen, P. Geo., who is a Project
Geologist of the Company; and (b) all other projects of Group Ten Metals, Debbie James, P. Geo, who is an independent consultant to the Company.
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. With respect to “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource”, there is a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and a great
uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” or “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Cautionary Note to US Investors Regarding Resource Estimates
The terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource”, “inferred mineral resource” used herein are Canadian mining terms used in accordance with NI 43-101 under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute
of Mining and Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as may be amended from time to time. These definitions differ from the definitions in the United States
Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7. In the United States, a mineral reserve is defined as a part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time the mineral reserve
determination is made. While the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource”, and “inferred mineral resource” are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not defined terms under
standards in the United States and normally are not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As such, information contained herein concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian
standards may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies in SEC filings. Accordingly, information herein containing descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by US
companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under US federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Third-Party Information
Where this presentation quotes any information or statistics from any external source, it should not be interpreted that the Company has adopted or endorsed such information or statistics as being accurate. Some of the information presented
herein, including scientific and technical information on third-party projects, is based on or derived from statements by third parties, has not been independently verified by or on behalf of the Company and the Company makes no representation or
warranty, express or implied, respecting the accuracy or completeness of such information or any other information or opinions contained herein, for any purpose whatsoever. References to third-party projects herein are for illustrative purposes
only and are not necessarily indicative of the exploration potential, extent or nature of mineralization, or potential future results of the Company’s projects.
TSX: PGE.V
2 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
THE METALLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES
A Collaboration of Leading, Independent Exploration Companies
The Metallic Group Strategy and Approach to Business
Highly Identify and Make acquisitions Focus on under- Apply our Create long-term
experienced acquire district- during the lows in explored systematic value for
leadership scale, brownfields metal price cycle brownfields areas exploration shareholders
A track record of major properties Aggregation of high- Existing infrastructure approach Resource development
discoveries and project Consolidating districts potential holdings allows for rapid Exploration utilizing followed by expansion
advancement along adjacent to some of during bear market development timelines new technologies and and advancement
with significant share the industry’s highest- creates fundamental, and reduced capital exploration models towards production
ownership in the grade mines, where counter-cycle strategic requirements focused on large-scale
companies potential exists to host value for shareholders compared to remote discoveries
world-class deposits greenfields deposits
TSX: PGE.V
3 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Project Portfolio and Kluane PGE-Ni-Cu Project
Strategy • Adjoins Nickel Creek Platinum
• district-scale assets
• adjacent to world-class mines/deposits Black Lake-Drayton Project
• Adjoins Treasury Metals
• 100% ownership on all projects
• substantial databases, new geologic
Yukon
models, world-class teams
➢ Potential for world-class discoveries CANADA
➢ Focus on advancing Stillwater West Ontario
Montana
Stillwater West Project
USA
• Large position in the highest-grade major PGE district in the world
• Adjacent to Sibanye-Stillwater’s three palladium-platinum mines
• Drill-defined “Platreef-style” mineralized zones advancing to
inferred resources
• Objective of becoming a primary US-based source of battery
metals, PGEs, and gold
TSX: PGE.V
4 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Management Team Greg Johnson Executive Chairman
Veteran Management with Proven • 30 years experience in exploration, development and financing of large-scale mining projects
• Broad capital markets experience, raising over $650 million in project financing
Track Record in Exploration and •
•
Co-founder of NovaGold, former President & CEO of Wellgreen Platinum and South American Silver
Exploration Manager Placer Dome (now Barrick Gold)
•
Mine Development Co-credited with discovery or expansion and advancement of major precious and base metal deposits
Michael Rowley President & CEO, Director
• 25+ years executive experience in the exploration, mineral processing, and mine environmental industries
• Expertise in capital markets, acquisitions, project development, management and exploration operations
• Co-founder of Group Ten, active in other listed exploration companies including Granite Creek Copper
Strong Corporate & Technical
Gregor Hamilton Director
Management • 24 years of experience in the mining sector as a geologist, investment banker and entrepreneur
• Capital markets expertise and global experience in M&A and structured finance
Group Ten has attracted a highly qualified team with • Since 2010, involved in the acquisition and development of mineral properties within both public
global experience in: and private resource companies in the Americas
Financing & Markets
• Over $650M raised Rebecca Moriarty Chief Financial Officer
• Global banking, evaluation and M&A expertise • Chartered Professional Account with over 20 years experience in mining industry
• Formerly Manager with PriceWaterhouse Coopers, focused on mineral resource sector
Management
• Combined 100+ years of corporate and exploration Alicia Milne Corporate Secretary
management, with juniors and majors
• 20+ years of corporate secretarial & securities compliance experience with NYSE, TSX & TSX Venture listed
Exploration and Development companies, including Pretium Resources
• Member of the Governance Professionals of Canada
• Extensive, first-hand experience in the Stillwater and
Bushveld districts, including the Platreef, among other
top-tier districts and producers Brian Cloney Advisor, Finance
• Over 35 years experience in public accounting and financial consulting experience with a particular focus
on the mining sector
• Past CFO of a number of publicly-traded resource companies, and former Director of Group Ten Metals
TSX: PGE.V
5 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Technical Team
World-Class Team with Experience at Stillwater, Bushveld, Platreef
Craig Bow, Ph.D. Senior Geological Advisor Harry Burgess, P.Eng. Advisor, Mining & Mine Engineering
• 40+ years experience in global exploration, mine geology, & project • 40+ years of mine engineering and management experience including senior positions
management, including exploration of the J-M Reef & advancement of the with Anglo-American and others in Zambia and South Africa
initial Stillwater Pd-Pt mine to production • Co-founder of Micon International Limited
• Recognized expert on global PGE-Ni-Cu systems, part of the team responsible for
multi-million-ounce Arctic Platinum partnership (Gold Fields/Outokumpu), Garth Kirkham, P.Geo. P.Geoph. Advisor, Geology & Mining
former Exploration Mgr for Gold Fields, Sr. Technical positions for Cyprus Amax,
Newcrest & AngloGold Ashanti • 34+ years experience in the mineral exploration industry as a board member, leader, and
geoscientist
Michael Johnson, P.Geo. Exploration Mgr, Stillwater West • Founder of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd and was a founding director of Group Ten Metals
• 40+ years of professional geological and executive experience, including 18 years • Numerous professional designations and awards
in senior management positions with global public mining companies, including
work in the Stillwater district as President and CEO of Beartooth Platinum Corp.
Doug Warkentin, P.Eng. Advisor, Processing & Metallurgy
Mike Ostenson, P.Geo. Project Geologist • 30+ years of experience in the mining and mineral processing industries
• 20 years experience in the Stillwater district including former VP Exploration for • Currently Senior Metallurgist at Kemetco Research Inc.
Premium Exploration and Senior Technical roles for Beartooth Platinum, • Co-founder of Group Ten Metals and former Director
Stillwater Mining Co. and AngloGold
Justin Modroo, P.Geo. Project Geophysicist Bill Harris Technical Advisor
• 20 years industry experience, including work in the Stillwater Complex with • Founder, former Executive of Triumph Gold, and President and CEO of Midnight Mining
Premium Exploration and Beartooth Platinum • Highly experienced prospector, mining entrepreneur
“The recognition of a Platreef setting in the Stillwater district is an exciting development”
Dr. David Broughton, former Chief Geologist for Ivanhoe Mines and co-recipient of AME BC’s 2016 Colin Spence Award
for Excellence in Global Mineral Exploration for Ivanhoes’ Flatreef discovery, September 2018
TSX: PGE.V
6 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
High-Demand Commodities
Platinum Group Elements (PGEs)
• Primary palladium and rhodium use in catalysts (auto and industrial), driven by tightening emissions standards
• Growing platinum demand from hydrogen fuel cells, investment demand, and catalytic convertors
• Listed as ‘critical minerals’ by the US Interior Department, with the objective of advancing domestic supplies
• Majority of supply from high-risk countries (South Africa, Russia)
• Palladium and rhodium currently at sustained, elevated prices on multi-year supply deficits, platinum price projected to follow
→ Demonstrated palladium, platinum and rhodium at Stillwater West
Battery Metals
• Surging demand for nickel sulphide (‘battery-grade’) from energy storage uses, especially electric vehicles
• Nickel and cobalt both listed as ‘critical’ in the American Mineral Security Act, with the intent of advancing US supplies
• Majority of cobalt supply is high-risk (Congo)
• Diminishing copper resources/grades (‘peak copper’)
• Positive price projections based on infrastructure and energy storage demands
→ Now modeling drill-defined battery-grade nickel sulphide, with copper, cobalt, PGEs, gold, at Stillwater West
primary value
drivers at
Stillwater West • Objective to become a primary US-based source of battery and precious metals
to meet surging demand from green energy and transportation needs
• Historic store of value, also jewelry, industrial
Gold • Hedge against political uncertainty, currency risks • Projected basket value about 33% Ni, 33% Pd, and 33% Pt/Rh/Au/Cu/Co across
• Diminishing resources/grades (‘peak gold’), need for three most advanced (drill-defined) mineralized zones
new resources/mines • Five target commodities identified as ‘critical’ by the US Government, with the
→ Drill-defined high-grade gold at the Pine target at objective of securing domestic supplies
Stillwater West, also as potential co-product, and • Located in a famously productive and metal-rich US mining district, which hosts
in Ontario at Black Lake – Drayton project three world-class mines and a smelter-refinery complex
TSX: PGE.V
7 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project Montana, USA
District – Mines, Infrastructure and Land Status
Stillwater District
• Stillwater Igneous Complex is:
• A layered magmatic system, similar to South
100% Stillwater West Africa’s Bushveld Complex
• Acquired 2017-2019 • 40km x 8km on surface, open at depth Smelter & Refinery Complex
owned • Reef and Platreef-style targets, also high-grade gold • Highly prospective for Ni, Cu, Pd, Pt, Au, Cr, Rh Columbus, MT (60 km)
Large 54 km2
• Five target areas feature thick intervals of drill-defined
claim block Platreef-style PGE-Ni-Cu-Co + Au mineralization
J-M Reef Deposit (Sibanye-Stillwater)
Reserves1: 25.6 Moz Pd+Pt at 17.2 g/t P&P
Resources1: 31.3 Moz Pd+Pt at 17.0 g/t M&I and Blitz Extension (2017)
49.4 Moz Pd+Pt at 16.6 g/t Inf.
Past Production2: over 14 Moz at +16 g/t Pd+Pt
Stillwater Mine (1986)
MAGMATIC 7 KM
LAYERS REEFS
(8KM)
Stillwater East
• Announced January 2021
East Boulder Mine (2002)
• 7 km2 claim block, 100% owned
PLATREEF • Reef and Platreef-style targets
SETTING
STILLWATER WEST (25 KM)
SIMPLIFIED CROSS-SECTION OF THE
STILLWATER IGNEOUS COMPLEX 1: References to adjoining properties are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the exploration potential, extent or nature of mineralization or potential future results of the Company’s
projects. 2: Based on publicly disclosed production statistics of Sibanye-Stillwater including most recent CPR.
TSX: PGE.V
8 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater and Bushveld Comparison
Comparative Mineralization Type West & East Limbs Stillwater North Limb Bushveld
Stratigraphy High-Grade Reef Deposits
Bushveld Complex Complex Complex
• Merensky Reef (Sibanye, Anglo and others)
and Main PGE • J-M Reef (Sibanye) 6 km
• Picket Pin Reef (Group Ten)
Occurrences in
PGE-Enriched Chromitites
the Stillwater • UG-2 (Sibanye, Anglo and others)
5
• A-B Chromitite (Group Ten) Picket Pin
and Bushveld Disseminated PGE-Ni-Cu
Reef
BANDED 4
Complexes Bulk Tonnage Sulphide-Type Deposits SERIES
• Platreef (Anglo, Ivanhoe)
Similarities • Sheba’s Ridge (Anglo)
• HGR (Group Ten) 3
The Bushveld and Stillwater
Igneous Complexes are similar • Camp Zone (Group Ten) Merensky Reef
J-M Reef
layered magmatic intrusions • Hybrid Unit (Group Ten) UG-2 Reef
Sibanye-Stillwater
2
Opportunity Lithology
Stillwater’s J-M Reef was Gabbro, Anorthosite Platiniferous
Dunite Pipes Discovery
discovered in the 1970s based on Gabbronorite, Anorthosite, Troctolite (poC)
- Mooihoek (Hybrid Unit)
parallels with reef deposits at Pyroxenite (bC)
- Driekop A-B Chromitite BASAL & 1
Peridotite LOWER Platreef
Bushveld, yet exploration at HGR
Norite (pbC), Pyroxenite (bC) SERIES
Stillwater lagged during discovery Basement Metasediment
and development of the massive,
polymetallic Platreef mines in the
Basement Granite 0
Sheba’s Ridge Camp
lower stratigraphy in the 1990s. Anglo American
Platreef Mine Mogalakwena
Ivanhoe Anglo American
References to third-party owned / operated projects are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the exploration potential,
extent or nature of mineralization or potential future results of the Company’s projects. The Company does not have access to such project or underlying
information and has not independently verified any of the scientific, technical or exploration information related to such third-party project. TSX: PGE.V
9 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32
TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater Complex LAYERED MAGMATIC COMPLEX (8KM THICK X 40KM LONG)
Target km GROUP TEN METALS SIBANYE-STILLWATER GROUP TEN METALS
0
Schematic South HGR
Discovery
(Hybrid
Section & Camp Unit) North
Current Mining
Geologic 1
DRILL-DEFINED
Operations
(up to 2.2 km
depth) Picket Pin Reef
MINERALIZATION
Models LOWER
(Group Ten)
Simplified BANDED
2 SERIES
Cross-Section of the MIDDLE UPPER
Stillwater Igneous Complex J-M Reef Deposit BANDED BANDED
(Sibanye-Stillwater) SERIES SERIES
3
INTRUSIVE DUNITE TARGET BASAL AND LOWER STRATIGRAPHY UPPER STRATIGRAPHY
Opportunity
• Stillwater’s J-M Reef was discovered in
the 1970s based on parallels with similar Platreef-Style Deposits Reef-Type Deposits
deposits at the Bushveld Complex • Lower in the layered stratigraphy • Higher in the layered stratigraphy
• Bushveld continued to move ahead with • Wide mineralized widths, 10 to 200 meters thick • Typically narrow, 0.5 to 2 meters thick
the discovery and development of • Ni-Cu sulphide mineralization, enriched in PGEs, Au, Co, others • High to very high-grade at 3 to 17 g/t PGE, in Ni-Cu sulphides
massive, polymetallic Platreef mines in • Typically low-cost bulk tonnage mining methods • Typically higher cost, selective underground mining methods
the 1990s • Comparables include the Platreef deposits, in South Africa: • Comparable deposits include:
• Group Ten is uniquely positioned to ‒ AngloAmerican’s Mogalakwena Mine ‒ J-M Reef (Stillwater)
advance the “Platreef-in-Montana” ‒ Ivanhoe’s Platreef Mine ‒ Merensky Reef (Bushveld)
model, with demonstrated “Platreef- ‒ Platinum Group Metals’ Waterberg project ‒ UG2 Reef (Bushveld)
style” mineralization
→ Eight “Platreef-style” target areas at Stillwater West → Six “Reef-type” target areas at Stillwater West
TSX: PGE.V
10 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project
Soil Geochemistry
Highly anomalous precious and SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY
Pt + Pd + Au (ppb)
2019 survey 2006 survey PRECIOUS METALS
(Pt, Pd, Au)
base metal values cover 21 km >200
strike in lower Stillwater 75 – 200
50 – 75
BAN
25 – 50
stratigraphy 15 – 25 BZ
5 – 15
IRON MOUNTAIN PZ
• High levels of platinum, palladium, gold,
HF
nickel, copper and other metals in soil CHROME MOUNTAIN
2 km
geochemistry across very large areas
• Gold, cobalt, chromium and other metals
also highly anomalous across large areas GEOLOGIC BOUNDARIES High levels of Au, Pd, and Pt in soils at Pine
BAN – Banded Series BZ – Bronzitite Zone target, and up to 2km west, identified 2019
• Strong soil response proximal to drill- PZ – Peridotite Zone HF - Hornfels
defined mineralization in priority target
areas demonstrates the effectiveness of
soils as an exploration tool at Stillwater, SOIL GEOCHEMISTRY BASE METALS
Ni + Cu (ppm) Drill-defined mineralization at the Discovery target presents very (Ni, Cu)
especially in the Peridotite Zone (PZ) >1,000 high Ni, Cu in soils, as do the Bald Hills and Tarantula targets
• Four new kilometer-scale soil anomalies 650 – 1,000
350 - 650
identified (untested to date) in 2019, 250 – 350 BAN
150 – 250
including expansion of highly anomalous 75 – 150
BZ
gold in soils at Pine target area IRON MOUNTAIN PZ
• Strong spatial correlation with broad,
high-level electro-magnetic conductor CHROME MOUNTAIN HF
anomalies 2 km
TSX: PGE.V
11 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West Conductivity (EM) Survey With Select Drill Results
14 large-scale (multi-kilometer) exploration target areas
identified across 25-km long property
Drilled 2020
14 target areas defined by major Drilled 2019
conductive high anomalies with Past core assayed in 2019
broad, coincident soil
geochemical anomalies:
Picket Pin
• Eight large-scale, bulk
tonnage PGE-Ni-Cu-Co + Au
sulphide target areas with
potential to host multiple 8 Large-scale, bulk tonnage PGE-Ni-Cu-Co target areas
with demonstrated ‘Platreef-Style’ mineralization
Platreef-Style deposits, each
one 2 to 4 km long 6 Higher-grade ‘Reef-
type’ target areas
• Six higher-grade PGE ‘Reef-
J-M REEF DEPOSIT (SIBANYE-STILLWATER) CATHEDRAL
East Boulder
type’ target areas that are 3
to 8 km long with potential to
host multiple ‘Reef-type’ CRESCENT
deposits
Five mineralized zones identified at IRON MOUNTAIN
the most advanced target areas BOULDER CAMP
EAST
based on data from more than 215 WILD WEST CHROME
BOULDER
drill holes totaling 31,000 meters MOUNTAIN 25 kilometers
across the property
See News Release “Group Ten Metals Identifies 12 Major Geophysical Conductor Anomalies at Stillwater West Project, Montana, USA” dated Feb. 26, 2018.
Grade thickness values for drill holes are shown for comparative purposes by multiplying mineralized intercepts times drilled width that are believed to be
representative of true widths. Platinum equivalent (Pt Eq. g/t) calculations reflect total gross metal content using $6/lb Ni, $3.00/lb Cu, $20.00/lb Co, $1,000/oz Pt,
$1,000/oz Pd and $1,250/oz Au and have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical recoveries.
TSX: PGE.V
12 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West Exploration Strategy:
• Deliver maiden resources in most advanced
Five Priority Target Areas areas (Chrome Mountain, Camp, HGR) Crescent
• 250m x 500m area, open for expansion
• Rapidly expand mineralization by off-setting • 5 holes at over 100 g-m
Pine – High-Grade Gold existing drill-defined mineralization and drill
• 150m strike, average width 15m, tested to 90m depth
• Open for expansion into coincident and gold-in-soil testing adjacent anomalies
•
anomalies reaching two kilometers to the west
7 holes with high-grade intercepts including:
• Advance earlier-stage targets to drill status
‒ 8.0m at 16g/t Au, 0.24g/t Pt, 0.50 g/t Pd
‒ 3.2m at 23g/t Au, 0.89g/t Pt, 1.04g/t Pd
East Boulder
IM2019-03
2020 INDUCED POLARIZATION
(IP) GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY LINES
Drilled 2020
Drilled 2019
Past core assayed in 2019
Drill data reported in news releases from Jan 25,
2019 through Apr 16, 2020, and March 3, 2021.
Chrome Mountain Camp HGR 2019 and 2020 drilling by Group Ten. Drilling
completed from 2002 through 2011 was verified
by Group Ten’s QP. Pre-2001 drill results are
Chrome Mountain, Camp, HGR: • Thick intervals of continuous mineralization, usually starting at or near surface, considered historic and have not been
independently verified. Grade-thickness values for
• The three most advanced target areas defined by between 11 and 24 drill holes in each area drill holes are shown for comparative purposes by
• Now converting drill-defined mineralized • Mineralized zones from 1 to 1.5 kilometers in strike length within each area multiplying mineralized intercepts times drilled
width that are believed to be representative of
zones to maiden resources – target mid-2021 • Significant expansion potential along trend and to depth based on multi-kilometer- true widths. Platinum equivalent (PtEq g/t)
calculations reflect total gross metal content
• Coincident anomalies, kilometer-scale targets scale metal-in-soil anomalies and geophysical anomalies from ground-based IP using $6/lb Ni, $3/lb Cu, $20/lb Co, $900/oz Pt,
• Fully permitted • IM2019-03 (HGR): 272m of 1.9 g/t TotPtEq (0.42% TotNiEq) including $1,650/oz Pd and $1,500/oz Au. Equivalent values
have not been adjusted to reflect potential
26.8m of 3.84 g/t TotPtEq (0.84% TotNiEq) – 7km east of Chrome Mountain metallurgical recoveries.
TSX: PGE.V
13 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West CM2007-02: 388 m of 0.99 g/t TotPtEq (0.22% TotNiEq), including:
• 30 m of 3.86 g/t TotPtEq (0.85% TotNiEq) as 0.60 g/t Pt, 1.25 g/t Pd, 0.19% Ni,
2020 Chrome Mtn Drill Results plus Au, Cu, Co values
1 km
CM2020-01: Hybrid Unit, IP targets, stratigraphy BAN
• 533 m of 0.76 g/t TotPtEq (0.17% TotNiEq) including CM2007-04: 243 m of 1.62 g/t TotPtEq (0.35% TotNiEq), including:
130 m of 0.96 g/t TotPtEq (0.21% TotNiEq) • 30 m of 3.07 g/t TotPtEq (0.67% TotNiEq) as 0.55 g/t Pt, 0.96 g/t Pd,
BAN
• Successfully expanded mineralized zone at Discovery 0.13 g/t Au, 0.13% Ni, plus Cu, Co values BAN
• High-grade Pt and Au, Pt-rich Pt:Pd ratio BZ
BZ
EAST BOULDER
CM2020-04: Offset of AMAX hole to test large IP CHROME CROSS
anomaly identified in 2020 survey MOUNTAIN SECTION
CM-17
• 455 m of 1.13 g/t TotPtEq (0.25% TotNiEq), including
two new thick horizons of nickel sulphide:
• 54 m of 2.58 g/t TotPtEq (0.57% TotNiEq) including CROSS PZ
8.5 m of 8.20 g/t TotPtEq (1.79% TotNiEq) SECTION
DISCOVERY
Peridotite Zone (PZ)
CM-4
as 1.11% Ni, 0.19% Cu, 0.053% Co, plus 1.90 g/t PtEq (HYBRID UNIT)
• 60 m of 2.22 g/t TotPtEq (0.48% TotNiEq) CONDUCTIVE HIGH
BALD HILLS
• High-grade, high-tenor nickel sulphide (3-10% Ni)
CONDUCTIVE HIGH CM2020-05: Test of large IP anomaly
CROSS
SECTION • 149 m of 1.19 g/t TotPtEq (0.26% TotNiEq), including
• Expansion of existing CM-6 11.6 m of 2.80 g/t TotPtEq (equals 0.61% TotNiEq)
mineralization • Multiple nickel and high-PGE horizons including 0.083 g/t Rh HF
• Discovery of multiple well- CM2020-02: Target Dunite pipes, test IP targets, stratigraphy
Fugro DIGHEM EM Survey DRILL RESULTS (2020 and select 2007) ROCK SAMPLE RESULTS
mineralized horizons of • 126 m of 1.33 g/t TotPtEq (0.29% TotNiEq), including: (Conductivity) Reported as Total Pt Equivalent Grade-Thickness as Total Pt Equivalent g/t
56kHz Apparent Resistivity and as Total Nickel Equivalent %
battery metals, PGEs, gold 24 m of 2.76 g/t TotPtEq (0.60% TotNiEq) which includes: (ohm-meters)
Full 3E Data Base Metal
TotPtEq g-m Data Only Data Only TotPtEq g/t TotNiEq %
6.1 m of 4.50 g/t TotPtEq (0.98% TotNiEq) including 1.13 g/t Pd 100 g-m
> 5 g/t > 1.22 %
2500
CM2020-03: Target Dunite pipes, test IP targets, stratigraphy >5000 GEOLOGIC BOUNDARIES: BAN – Banded Series; BZ – Bronzitite Zone;
• 122 m of 1.27 g/t TotPtEq (0.28% TotNiEq), including: PZ – Peridotite Zone; HF - Hornfels
23 m of 1.64 g/t TotPtEq (0.36% TotNiEq) which includes:
6.1 m of 3.51 g/t TotPtEq (0.77% TotNiEq) including 0.97 g/t Pd
TSX: PGE.V
• >3.4% Ni in sulphides in multiple intervals in both 14
holes OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West
Chrome Mountain Target Area
Cross-Section CM-17
• Discovery of well-mineralized new nickel
sulphide-PGE horizons that are over 1km
from other drill-defined mineralization
Nickel sulphides with high nickel tenor:
109 meters at 0.17% Ni, plus other values
OPEN
CM2020-05:
• 149 m of 1.19 g/t TotPtEq (0.26% TotNiEq)
• Strong nickel and PGE mineralization in multiple intercepts
High-PGE interval:
• 11.6 meters at 2.80 g/t TotPtEq (0.61% TotNiEq)
Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %)
calculations reflect total gross metal content using metals prices as follows (all as 0.41 g/t Pt, 0.54 g/t Pd, 0.083 g/t Rh, plus other values
USD): $6.00/lb nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz • At current spot prices 0.083 g/t Rh equals over 1.6 g/t Pt
platinum (Pt), $1,650/oz palladium (Pd), $1,500/oz gold (Au), and $7,000/oz
rhodium (Rh). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical • Pt:Pd ratio near 1:1
recoveries. Total metal equivalent values include both base and precious OPEN
metals. Nickel equivalent values may be converted to copper equivalent values
by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the
above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Intervals are
reported as drilled widths, and are believed to be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
15 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West CM2020-01: 404.6 g-m TotPtEq / 88.5 %-m TotNiEq
• 533 m of 0.76 g/t TotPtEq (0.17% TotNiEq) including
Chrome Mountain Target Area 130 m of 0.96 g/t TotPtEq (0.21% TotNiEq)
• Continuous nickel and copper sulphide mineralization
Cross-Section CM-6
Selectively assayed for Ni, Cu
• Expansion of drill-defined mineralization
Not assayed for PGEs
at the Discovery target in the Hybrid Unit Hybrid Unit
(Priority Target) 2.4 m of
2.49 g/t Au
Intrusive Dunite
(Priority Target) 9.8 m of
0.51 g/t Pt
OPEN
CM2007-02: 388 m of 0.99 g/t TotPtEq (0.22% TotNiEq)
Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %) starting at surface and including:
calculations reflect total gross metal content using metals prices as follows (all • 50 m of 2.91 g/t TotPtEq (0.64% TotNiEq) as 0.49 g/t Pt,
USD): $6.00/lb nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz
platinum (Pt), $1,650/oz palladium (Pd), $1,500/oz gold (Au), and $7,000/oz
0.91 g/t Pd, 0.14% Ni, plus Au, Cu, Co
rhodium (Rh). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical • 30 m of 3.86 g/t TotPtEq (0.85% TotNiEq) as 0.60 g/t Pt, OPEN
recoveries. Total metal equivalent values include both base and precious 1.25 g/t Pd, 0.19% Ni, plus Au, Cu, Co
metals. Nickel equivalent values may be converted to copper equivalent values
by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the
above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Intervals are OPEN
reported as drilled widths, and are believed to be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
16 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West Shallow historic holes ending in
CM2007-07:
226 m of 1.58 g/t TotPtEq (0.34% TotNiEq) including:
Chrome Mountain Target Area Ni-Cu sulphide mineralization • 23.8 m of 2.69 g/t TotPtEq (0.59% TotNiEq) and
• 9.2 m of 4.07 g/t TotPtEq (0.89% TotNiEq)
Cross-Section CM-4 as 0.43 g/t Pt, 1.31 g/t Pd, 0.17% Ni plus Au, Cu, Co values
• Discovery of new high-grade and high
8.5 meters at
tenor nickel sulphide horizons
Selectively assayed for Ni, Cu
Selectively assayed for Ni, Cu
1.11% Ni plus
Not assayed for PGEs
Not assayed for PGEs
strong co-
product Au,
Nickel sulphides PGEs, Cu, Co
CM2020-02:
with high nickel for 1.79%
126 m of 1.33 g/t TotPtEq (0.29% TotNiEq), including: tenor
• 24 m of 2.76 g/t TotPtEq (0.60% TotNiEq) which includes: TotNiEq
• 6.1 m of 4.50 g/t TotPtEq (0.98% TotNiEq) including 1.13 g/t Pd
Hybrid Unit
• 54m of 0.27% Ni, 1.01 g/t
(Priority Target)
CM2020-03: PtEq, plus Cu, Co for
122 m of 1.27 g/t TotPtEq (0.28% TotNiEq), including: 0.57% TotNiEq
• 23 m of 1.64 g/t TotPtEq (0.36% TotNiEq) which includes: • Nickel sulphides with high
• 6.1 m of 3.51 g/t TotPtEq (0.77% TotNiEq) including 0.97 g/t Pd nickel tenor
CM2020-04: 515.4 g-m TotPtEq / 112.8 %-m TotNiEq
Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %) 455 m of 1.13 g/t TotPtEq (0.25% TotNiEq), including
calculations reflect total gross metal content using metals prices as follows (all two new thick horizons of nickel sulphide:
USD): $6.00/lb nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz
platinum (Pt), $1,650/oz palladium (Pd), $1,500/oz gold (Au), and $7,000/oz • 54m of 2.58 g/t TotPtEq (0.57% TotNiEq) and
rhodium (Rh). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical
OPEN • 60 m of 2.22 g/t TotPtEq (0.48% TotNiEq)
recoveries. Total metal equivalent values include both base and precious
metals. Nickel equivalent values may be converted to copper equivalent values
by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the OPEN
above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Intervals are
reported as drilled widths, and are believed to be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
17 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project
Discovery Target at the
Hybrid Unit, Chrome
Mountain - Drill Results
Multiple long drill intervals returned multi-
gram-per-tonne precious metals (Pd, Pt, Au)
Five holes at >300 gram-meter TotPtEq
grade-thickness demonstrate significant
metal content and some of the longest
intervals of mineralization ever encountered
in the Stillwater district
Grade-Thickness:
• Sibanye-Stillwater (J-M Reef):
2m @ 17 g/t Pd+Pt = 34 g-m
• Group Ten:
50m @ 1.4 g/t Pd+Pt = 70 g-m
(plus Ni, Cu, Co, Au, Rh values)
Highlight intercepts with grade-thickness values over 25 gram-meter TotPtEq are presented above. Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %) calculations reflect total gross metal content using metals prices as follows (all USD): $6.00/lb
nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz platinum (Pt), $1,400/oz palladium (Pd), and $1,400/oz gold (Au). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical recoveries. Total metal equivalent values include both base and precious metals. Total
platinum equivalent grade-thickness was determined by multiplying the thickness (in meters) by the Total Platinum Equivalent grade (in grams/tonne) to provide gram-meter values (g-m) as shown. Total nickel equivalent grade-thickness was determined by multiplying the
thickness (in meters) by the Total Nickel Equivalent grade (in percent) to provide percent-meter values as shown. Grade-thickness values have been determined across continuously mineralized intervals. Nickel equivalent values may be converted to copper equivalent values
by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Platinum equivalent has been used based on the historic values of platinum and palladium. Platinum equivalent values may be converted
to palladium equivalent values by multiplying the PtEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times 0.64 per the above prices), such that 1 g/t PtEq equates to 0.64 g/t PdEq. Intervals are reported as drilled widths and are believed to be representative of true widths. All holes
were conducted by Group Ten’s QP and are not considered historic.
TSX: PGE.V
18 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project
2020 Chrome Mountain -
Drill Results
• The first drill program guided by the 2020
Induced Polarization (IP) geophysical survey
• Multiple new well-mineralized horizons
identified, including high-grade, and high-tenor,
nickel sulphides
• All five holes returned intervals from 120 to 530
meters of continuous nickel and copper sulphide
mineralization, enriched in palladium, platinum,
rhodium, gold, and cobalt, starting at or near
surface
• Each hole also returned higher-grade intervals
over widths of 50 to 150 meters in addition to
more selective high-grade intervals
• Results indicate potential for both bulk and
selective mining scenarios at 0.5 g/t PtEq cut-off
and 1.5 g/t PtEq cut-off respectively
Highlight intercepts with grade-thickness values over 25 gram-meter TotPtEq are presented above. Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %) calculations reflect total gross metal content using metals prices as follows (all USD): $6.00/lb
nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz platinum (Pt), $1,650/oz palladium (Pd), $1,500/oz gold (Au), and $7,000 rhodium (Rh). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical recoveries. Total metal equivalent values include both base and
precious metals. Total platinum equivalent grade-thickness was determined by multiplying the thickness (in meters) by the Total Platinum Equivalent grade (in grams/tonne) to provide gram-meter values (g-m) as shown. Total nickel equivalent grade-thickness was
determined by multiplying the thickness (in meters) by the Total Nickel Equivalent grade (in percent) to provide percent-meter values as shown. Grade-thickness values have been determined across continuously mineralized intervals. Nickel equivalent values may be
converted to copper equivalent values by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Platinum equivalent has been used based on the historic values of platinum and palladium.
Platinum equivalent values may be converted to palladium equivalent values by multiplying the PtEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times 0.55 per the above prices), such that 1 g/t PtEq equates to 0.64 g/t PdEq. Intervals are reported as drilled widths and are believed
to be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
19 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West
Iron Mountain Target Area
Cross-Section IM-18
One of three target areas with demonstrated
‘Platreef-style’ bulk tonnage PGE-Ni-Cu-Co
mineralization over hundreds of meters in
thickness.
2019 programs:
• returned some of the thickest mineralized
intercepts ever recorded in the district
• successfully advanced the HGR target
towards delineation of a maiden resource
with multiple very wide intervals of nickel
and copper sulphide, enriched in palladium,
platinum and gold, starting from surface
• returned results that are comparable to the
style of mineralization found in South Africa’s
Platreef district, which hosts some of the
world’s largest nickel-copper sulphide hosted
PGE mines
Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent
(TotNiEq %) calculations reflect total gross metal content using
metals prices as follows (all USD): $6.00/lb nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb
copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz platinum (Pt), $1,400/oz
palladium (Pd), and $1,400/oz gold (Au). Values have not been
adjusted to reflect metallurgical recoveries. Total metal equivalent
values include both base and precious metals. Nickel equivalent
values may be converted to copper equivalent values by
multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times
two per the above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0%
CuEq. Intervals are reported as drilled widths, and are believed to
be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
20 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West
HGR Zone at the Iron
Mountain Target Area
2019 Drill Results
2019 results returned some of the
thickest mineralized intercepts,
and the highest grade-thickness
values, ever recorded in the
district, including potential bulk
and selective mining scenarios
Assuming a 0.5g/t PtEq cut-off grade: Assuming a 1.5g/t PtEq cut-off grade: Approximate Width of Grade-Thickness:
272m @ 1.90g/t PtEq, or 141m @ 2.59g/t PtEq, or Ivanhoe’s Flatreef Deposit • Sibanye-Stillwater (J-M Reef):
“ 0.42% NiEq, or “ 0.57% NiEq, or 2m @ 17 g/t Pd+Pt = 34 g-m
• Group Ten:
“ 0.84% CuEq “ 1.14% CuEq 272.5m @ 1.90 TotPtEq = 518 g-m
Highlight intercepts with grade-thickness values over 100 gram-meter TotPtEq are presented above, except as noted. Total Platinum Equivalent (TotPtEq g/t) and Total Nickel Equivalent (TotNiEq %) calculations reflect total gross metal content using
metals prices as follows (all USD): $6.00/lb nickel (Ni), $3.00/lb copper (Cu), $20.00/lb cobalt (Co), $900/oz platinum (Pt), $1,400/oz palladium (Pd), and $1,400/oz gold (Au). Values have not been adjusted to reflect metallurgical recoveries. Total metal
equivalent values include both base and precious metals. Total platinum equivalent grade-thickness was determined by multiplying the thickness (in meters) by the Total Platinum Equivalent grade (in grams/tonne) to provide gram-meter values (g-m)
as shown. Total nickel equivalent grade-thickness was determined by multiplying the thickness (in meters) by the Total Nickel Equivalent grade (in percent) to provide percent-meter values as shown. Nickel equivalent values may be converted to copper
equivalent values by multiplying the NiEq value by the price ratio of the two (ie times two per the above prices), such that 0.5% NiEq equates to 1.0% CuEq. Intervals are reported as drilled widths, and are believed to be representative of true widths.
TSX: PGE.V
21 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project
Kilometer-Scale Magmatic Targets in a Famously Metal-Rich District
J-M Reef Deposit (Sibanye-Stillwater)
Cross-section CM-4
Cross-section CM-6
MVI Susceptibility
Cross-section CM-17 Cross-section IM-18
Chrome
Wild West
Mountain
Camp Iron
Mountain
Magmatic Targets
Crescent
Magmatic Targets
2 km
depth
Long-section through
Stillwater West
Magnetic Vector Inversion (MVI) results showing kilometer-scale exploration targets (pink areas) that continue below the five known mineralized
zones at Stillwater West (yellow text). Potential for significant depth extension, including possible magmatic feeder zones.
TSX: PGE.V
22 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Stillwater West PGE-Ni-Cu Project
Progress and Next Steps 2020
• “Platreef-style” drill results from three target areas (Discovery, Camp, HGR)
• Discovery of four new multi-kilometre-scale soil anomalies
2019 Milestones • High-grade gold and rhodium results
• Chrome Mountain drill program, IP survey
• Initial block modeling of most
2017 – 2018 advanced targets
• Drill program, plus re- 2021 Priorities
• Acquisition, expansion logging/re-assay of past core
• Advance drill-defined mineralized zones to formal resources
• Data compilation and modeling • Collaboration with GoldSpot
(AI and machine-learning) • Expand known mineralization into untested areas
• Initial field programs • Identify and prioritize new targets
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Upcoming News
• IP results and 2021 exploration plans
• Formal resource estimates (expected mid-2021)
• Potential agreements on secondary assets: Black
Lake-Drayton (gold), Kluane (PGE-Ni-Cu)
TSX: PGE.V
23 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Black Lake – Drayton Gold Project
Underexplored High-Grade Gold Prospect in Active Rainy River District
Overview
• 137 km2 land package adjoining Treasury Metals’
recently consolidated +3Moz Goliath Gold Complex
• 30km of underexplored Archean greenstone strike GOLIATH GOLD COMPLEX
+3Moz Au, permitted
• High-grade gold demonstrated in 127 drill-hole
database, historic bulk samples
• 100%-owned, low carrying cost
• Direct road access, close to rail and power
• Discovery and development of Rainy River lead the
district in the 1990s, which is now over 10Moz and
growing
Priorities for 2021
• Continue ongoing discussions re best avenue to
monetize asset
• Undertake modest surface exploration program to
expand known mineralization, refine targets
TSX: PGE.V
24 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Kluane PGE-Ni-Cu Project Overview
Underexplored High-Grade Gold Prospect in Active Rainy River District
Overview
• Kluane Mafic-Ultramafic belt extends 600 km
from northern British Columbia to central
Alaska and hosts known PGE-Ni-Cu deposits
• 100% ownership in four claim blocks
• The multi-million-ounce Wellgreen PGE-Ni-
Cu-Co deposit demonstrates the world-class
potential of the belt
• Similar geology to largest known PGE-Ni-Cu
deposits including the Bushveld and Stillwater
complexes
Near-Term Priority
• Continue ongoing discussions re best
avenue to monetize asset
• Undertake modest surface exploration
program to expand known mineralization,
refine targets
TSX: PGE.V
25 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32TSX-V: PGE OTCQB: PGEZF FSE: 5D32
Capital
Structure PGE.V - GROUP TEN METALS JJNTF - Nickel ETF
CDNX - Index
PPLT – Platinum ETF
& Relative Share
PALL – Palladium ETF
Performance
PGE.V - GROUP TEN METALS
50-day moving average
PGE.V - GROUP TEN METALS
200-day moving average
Share price (as of February 26, 2021) C$0.41
SHAREHOLDER
Shares issued & outstanding 147M COMPOSITION Mgmt & Associates - 26%
Options (average exercise price: $0.18) 12.4M
Warrants (average exercise price: $0.27) 40.5M HNW - 21% Retail - 31%
Fully diluted shares outstanding 199M
Market capitalization (basic) C$60M Institutional
22%
Cash & cash equivalents balance (no debt) ~C$3M
In-the-money options & warrants ~C$13M
As of January 10, 2021
TSX: PGE.V
26 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32Group Ten Metals Inc.
Suite 904 - 409 Granville Street
Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6C 1T2
Email: info@grouptenmetals.com
Tel: 604.357.4790
Toll Free: 888.432.0075
www.grouptenmetals.com
@grouptenmetals
TSX: PGE.V | OTCQB: PGEZF | FSE: 5D32 TSX: PGE.V
27 OTCQB: PGEZF
FSE: 5D32You can also read
