LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...

 
CONTINUE READING
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
SPRING 2020
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT

  FORECAST REPORT   2020
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD
     DIRECTORS
     BOARD OF

                 KATHRYN HECHT, CHAIR    JORGE ALCAZAR       SKIP BRAND
                 PAM CHANTER TERRI DENTE       TERRY GARRETT     LINDA KACHIU
                 WAYNE LEACH     MICHAEL NICHOLLS       MICHAEL TOMASINI
                 SHEBA PERSON-WHITLEY, Executive Director

                                         EDB FOUNDATION SPONSORS

                                           FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL

                                            PRESENTING LEVEL

                                              PREMIER LEVEL

                       EXECUTIVE LEVEL                                  MEDIA LEVEL
     •     AMERICAN RIVER BANK     •   NORTH BAY ASSOCIATION OF
     •     COMCAST                     REALTORS
     •     KEEGAN & COPPIN CO.     •   SONOMA COUNTY ALLIANCE
     •     MIDSTATE CONSTRUCTION   •   SUMMIT STATE BANK
     •     MORGAN STANLEY          •   PISENTI & BRINKER LLP

                    SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

SONOMAEDB.ORG                                       PG. 2
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
CONTENTS

                  4.    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

                  6-10. SONOMA COUNTY ECONOMY

                  11-13. MOODY’S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

                  14-15. MOODY’S FORECAST RISKS

SONOMAEDB.ORG   PG. 3
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
SPRING 2020 LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT

   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY                                                                           June 2020

   The Sonoma County Economic Development Board is pleased to present the Spring 2020 Local
   Economic Report. Our research partner, Moody’s Analytics, provided the data for this report. For
   additional information, questions, comments, or suggestions, please contact us at (707) 565-7170
   or visit www.sonomaedb.org.
   Disclaimer to the Reader: The forthcoming details in this report reflect trends sourced from data
   gathered during the novel Coronavirus pandemic. Figures, such as employment rates, have been
   susceptible to great variability and are ever-changing. It is expected that Sonoma County will return
   to Pre-COVID employment levels in late 2021; when the projected vaccine is widely available and
   distributed.

   HIGHLIGHTS

                                       Manufacturing of non-durable goods, such as food and
                                       beverage, will continue to serve Sonoma County well in light
                                       of COVID-19. However small and mid-size wineries, breweries
                                       and distilleries, in partnership with local and state officials,
                                       need to compose creative solutions to safely accommodate in-
                                       person visits. Many of the manufacturers in this demographic
                                       rely on in person visits to meet their sales demands.

                                       On another hand, housing prices have remained relatively
                                       stagnant, despite pressures from COVID-19. The stagnation
                                       of home prices comes two-fold. Home-buyers are dissuaded
                                       from engaging in the market resulting in downward pressure
                                       on prices. Whereas, the continuing shortage of homes
                                       and dwellings, due to fires and lack of building permit
                                       volume, applies upward pressure on prices in the housing
                                       market. With both variables considered, housing prices are
                                       forecasted to decline by .5% in an already overvalued market.

SONOMAEDB.ORG                                      PG. 4
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
SONOMAEDB.ORG   PG. 5
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
SONOMA COUNTY CA
  METRO                                  EMPLOYMENT GROWTH RANK                                            RELATIVE COSTS                               VITALITY
  COMPARISON                                                                                           LIVING      BUSINESS                        RELATIVE    RANK
                                                       Best=1, Worst=409                                            U.S.=100%                       U.S.=100%    Best=1, Worst=402
  Sonoma County                      248 (4th quintile)           194 (3rd quintile)                     137%                   121%                 104%                120
  Santa Barbara County               245 (3rd quintile)           203 (3rd quintile)                     137%                   129%                 109%                 95
  Santa Cruz County                  158 (2nd quintile)            83 (2nd quintile)                     151%                   126%                 107%                101
  Sacramento MSA                     208 (3rd quintile)           154 (2nd quintile)                     112%                   120%                 112%                 79
  Monterey County                     178 (3rd quintile)          143 (2nd quintile)                     128%                   121%                 103%                127
             BUSINESS CYCLE
                      CYCLE STATUS
                            STATUS                                                                              ANALYSIS
                                                                                                                ANALYSIS
                                                                    Recent Performance. Sonoma County’s pos-             down to about 150,000 passengers daily from
                             Mid
                          Expansion                              itive economic momentum will be halted by the           more than 2 million a year earlier.
                                        Late                     COVID-19 pandemic. Job growth steadily accel-              Negative wealth effects from lower equity
               Recovery               Expansion
                                                                 erated through 2019 and overtook the California         prices and widespread unemployment will ham-
                                                                 average in early 2020. Goods producers were the         string sales of higher-end wines. Though alcohol
         In Recession                        At Risk             standout performers, with job gains up a robust         purchases are less vulnerable than other luxury
                                                                 8% year over year in March. Leisure/hospitality         goods during economic downturns, wineries and
                                                                 remained a sore spot, and early shutdowns and           breweries will still be dealt a blow. Evidence from
       STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES
                                                                 slowing travel put additional pressure on pay-          the Great Recession shows that winery pretax
                         STRENGTHS                               rolls, though the full extent of the impact will not    profits fell from 16% to 9% to 2% from 2007
 » World-class wineries and craft breweries are                  show up until April data are released. The jobless      to 2009, and sales volume swung from 22%
   magnets for tourism.                                          rate ticked up slightly but, at 3%, is still near its   growth in 2007 to 2% in 2008 to a decline of
 » Leader in organic food production.                            cyclical low. Meanwhile, residential building de-       4% in 2009, according to financial statements
 » Climate draws outdoor enthusiasts.                            celerated but remained strong. However, permit          collected by Silicon Valley Bank.
 » High quality of life.
                                                                 issuance and home sales cratered in March as               Housing. The sharp downtick in both hous-
                    WEAKNESSES                                   shelter-in-place orders dissuaded buyers from           ing demand and supply will mirror the twin de-
 » Limited land availability for new wineries and                the market.                                             mand and supply shocks inflicted on the overall
   commercial construction.                                         Manufacturing. Sonoma’s manufacturing                U.S. economy by COVID-19. House prices, al-
 » High costs relative to emerging tech hubs.                    base has been a robust growth driver in recent          ready somewhat overvalued when compared
 » Unfavorable age structure.
                                                                 years, and while it will not be unscathed by            with their long-term trend value, will register
                                                                 COVID-19-related weakness, it will help buffer          an average decline of 0.5 percentage point for
                 FORECAST RISKS                                  the county’s tourism-reliant sectors. Sonoma            2020. Although demand will crater as poten-
                                                   X

                                                                 County’s manufacturing industry is advancing            tial homebuyers stay in their current dwellings,
                    W

 SHORT TERM                    LONG TERM
                                                                 at a healthy pace, in contrast to declines at the       the persistent shortage of supply will mitigate
 RISK EXPOSURE
                         92         2nd quintile
                                                     Highest=1
                                                    Lowest=403
                                                                 state level. The manufacturing base is growing
                                                                 ever more bifurcated; nondurable producers are
                                                                                                                         some of the downward pressure on prices. Ad-
                                                                                                                         ditionally, a sharp rebound in construction ac-
                                                                 rapidly adding to payrolls while durable goods          tivity and sales is expected toward the end of
                          UPSIDE                                 payrolls have slid since early 2019. Food and           2020 and in early 2021 as the COVID-19 pan-
 » Consumers embrace organic foods with even
                                                                 beverage manufacturers, in particular, have been        demic subsides and the housing market begins
   greater enthusiasm.
 » Marin biotech firms expand in Sonoma.
                                                                 standout performers this decade. Supply chain           a return to normalcy.
                                                                 disruptions and a pullback in spending at restau-          Sonoma County’s near-term outlook has
                         DOWNSIDE                                rants will crimp near-term growth.                      soured in light of COVID-19. Forced busi-
 » COVID-19 does more economic damage.                              Wine. Shelter-in-place orders and travel re-         ness closures, reduced travel volumes, and
 » Population trends fail to improve.
                                                                 strictions will deal a body blow to small and mid-      other containment efforts have plunged the
 » More wine enthusiasts flock to the Pacific
   Northwest.                                                    size wineries and breweries whose sales rely on         economy into recession in the first half of
 » Weaker trade with East Asia hurts medical device              in-person visits. Tasting room visits have ceased       2020. Fortunately, over the long run, income
   and wine industries.                                          as the state closed all nonessential businesses,        gains will be in line with the national average.
                                                                 sealing off a crucial source of sales for local win-    However, the high cost of living will restrain
                                                                 eries. Taprooms are also reeling. While Sonoma          population and employment additions.
                MOODY’S RATING                                   caters heavily to in-state visitors, TSA volumes           Colin Seitz                        1-866-275-3266

        Aa2                           SANTA ROSA
                                    AS OF DEC 20, 2017
                                                                 point to the near-complete shutdown of travel,             April 2020                      help@economy.com

   2013       2014        2015        2016         2017     2018                  INDICATORS                         2019       2020      2021       2022 2023 2024
    24.4         25.8       27.5        28.0        29.4      30.8          Gross metro product (C12$ bil)             31.5       30.8     31.6       33.2       34.3       34.9
      3.0         5.5         6.7         1.8        4.9        4.7                    % change                          2.3       -2.2      2.7        4.9        3.3        1.9
   181.8        191.0      196.7       201.6       205.4     208.7             Total employment (ths)                211.4       206.6    207.6      212.3      216.0      216.9
      4.7          5.1        3.0        2.5         1.9        1.6                    % change                          1.3       -2.3      0.5        2.3        1.7        0.4
       7.1        5.6         4.5        4.0         3.4        2.7            Unemployment rate (%)                     2.7        5.4      6.2        5.5        4.8        5.0
     4.6           7.0        8.1        3.9         5.3       6.8           Personal income growth (%)                  5.9        2.0      3.2        5.6        5.0        4.0
    64.0         66.1       70.0        74.0        78.7      81.4         Median household income ($ ths)             83.7       86.3     89.0       92.6        96.1      99.3
   494.0       498.4       500.9       502.7       502.7     498.7                 Population (ths)                  497.7       497.5    497.8      498.4      499.0      499.8
     0.8          0.9         0.5        0.4         0.0      -0.8                     % change                        -0.2        -0.0      0.1        0.1        0.1        0.1
      2.9         3.5         1.5        1.0        -0.7      -4.3               Net migration (ths)                    -1.2       -0.6     -0.3       -0.0        0.0        0.1
     453          419        431         621        840      3,169            Single-family permits (#)               2,135      1,409    1,533      1,624      1,458      1,355
     593         244         190        298         338        110             Multifamily permits (#)                 368         202      410        470        421        398
   208.3       238.8       260.4       282.1       306.2     332.5         FHFA house price (1995Q1=100)             336.8       348.9    358.3      374.2      392.5      413.5

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Metro / April 2020                                     PG. 6
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
PRÉCIS® U.S. METRO • Sonoma County CA

                                                      ECONOMIC HEALTH CHECK                                                                                     BUSINESS CYCLE INDEX
  3-MO MA                                                   Sep 19         Oct 19    Nov 19          Dec 19          Jan 20         Feb 20                              JAN 2009=100
  Employment, change, ths                                        0.9            0.8       0.5             0.3             0.2             0.1      130
  Unemployment rate, %                                            2.7           2.7        2.6            2.5             2.4            2.5       125
                                                                                                                                                   120
  Labor force participation rate, %                             64.6          64.5       64.6            64.7            64.6           64.4
                                                                                                                                                   115
  Average weekly hours, #                                       32.3           32.4      32.4            32.3            32.4           32.7
                                                                                                                                                   110
  Industrial production, 2012=100                              110.8          111.4     112.0           112.5           112.9          113.5       105
  Residential permits, single-family, #                        2,189         1,824      1,792          2,239           2,492          2,387        100
  Residential permits, multifamily, #                           494             451       170             172             155            157        95
  Dec/Dec                                                    2014          2015       2016            2017            2018           2019           90
                                                                                                                                                          09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
  Employment, change, ths                                         5.4            6.1       4.1            3.9              1.8           3.2
                                                                                                                                                                  SAA                CA             U.S.
       Better than prior 3-mo MA                          Unchanged from prior 3-mo MA                  Worse than prior 3-mo MA
 Sources: BLS, Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics                                                                                                     Source: Moody’s Analytics

                                                        EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
                                                CURRENT EMPLO                                                                                                      DIFFUSION INDEX
                    % CHANGE YR AGO
  8
                                                                                                         Feb 19          Aug 19          Feb 20     70
  6                                                                          Total                           0.2              0.5            1.8
  4                                                                          Mining                          -0.1             0.1          -0.0     65
  2                                                                          Construction                   10.6              8.6          10.2
                                                                             Manufacturing                    1.0           -0.4             2.1    60
  0                                                                          Trade                           -1.1            -1.5           -1.2
 -2                                                                          Trans/Utilities                 0.8              4.1           -1.5    55
 -4                                                                          Information                    -3.8            -3.6            0.0
 -6
                                                                             Financial Activities            -3.1            -1.7            2.0    50
                                                                             Prof & Business Svcs.            2.7             1.4            3.0
       14          15        16             17            18         19      Edu & Health Svcs.              0.5              4.3            2.8    45
                                                                             Leisure & Hospitality            2.5            0.4            -1.2          14      15       16         17       18          19
             Government                  Goods producing
                                                                             Other Services                  0.4            -1.6             3.3                  SAA                CA             U.S.
                              Private services
                                                                             Government                     -6.7            -4.6             1.2
 Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics                                              Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics                                      Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics

                                                    YMENT PERFORMANCE
                                      RELATIVE EMPLOYMENT                                                                                                              HOUSE PRICE
                                                 JAN 2009=100                                                          FORECAST                                        1998Q1=100, NSA
                                                                                                                     VS. 6 MO PRIOR                 350
 125
 120                                                                                                                     2-Yr       5-Yr            300
 115                                                                                                                                                250
                                                                                                                     ▲

                                                                                                                                 ▲
                                                                                                                     ▼

                                                                                                                                 ▼
                                                                                                                     l

                                                                                                                                 l

 110                                                                                                                                                200
 105
                                                                                                                     ▲

                                                                                                                                 ▲

                                                                                                                                                    150
                                                                                                                     ▼

                                                                                                                                 ▼
                                                                                                                     l

                                                                                                                                 l

 100                                                                                                                                                100
                                                                                                                     ▲

                                                                                                                                 ▲
                                                                                                                     ▼

                                                                                                                                 ▼
                                                                                                                     l

                                                                                                                                 l

  95
                                                                                                                                                     50
  90                                                                                                                                                       98     01     04     07        10   13     16        19
            09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19F 20F 21F 22F 23F
                                                                                                                                                                  SAA                CA             U.S.
                                      SAA                   CA             U.S.
 Sources: BLS, Moody’s Analytics                                                                                                                    Sources: FHFA, Moody’s Analytics

                   VACANCY RATES                                                            HOUSE PRICE TRENDS                                              HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
          HOMEOWNER, % HOUSES FOR SALE                                                                      %                                            GREATER THAN 100=MORE AFFORDABLE
                                                                               60
                                                                                                                                                    220
                                                                               50                                                                   200
                                                                               40                                                                   180
                                                                               30                                                                   160
      0.0    0.2   0.4      0.6       0.8       1.0   1.2      1.4   1.6
                                                                                                                                                    140
                    SAA                 CA                U.S.
                                                                               20
            RENTAL, % INVENTORY FOR RENT                                                                                                            120
                                                                               10
                                                                                                                                                    100
                                                                                  0                                                                  80
                                                                              -10                                                                    60
                                                                              -20                                                                    40
                                                                                      98     01    04     07        10     13       16     19              96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18
      0        1        2         3         4         5        6     7
                    SAA                 CA                U.S.                             Overvalued               Undervalued                                    SON               CA             U.S.

 Sources: Census Bureau, ACS, Moody’s Analytics, 2018                         Sources: FHFA, Moody’s Analytics                                      Sources: NAR, Moody’s Analytics

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Metro / April 2020                                                       PG. 7
LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT - SPRING 2020 - Sonoma County ...
PRÉCIS® U.S. METRO • Sonoma County CA

                                                   YMENT AND INDUSTRY
                                              EMPLOYMENT     INDUSTR                                                                                              ENTREPRENEURSHIP
                      TOP EMPLOYERS                                                         INDUSTRIAL DIVERSITY                                      EMPLOYMENT IN NEW COMPANIES, % OF TOTAL
 Kaiser Permanente                                                3,508                                Most Diverse (U.S.)
 Graton Resort & Casino                                           2,000                         1.00
 St. Joseph Health System                                         1,640
 Keysight Technologies                                            1,300                         0.80
 Safeway Inc.                                                     1,200
 Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital                              1,050                         0.60                                                     0.0         0.5          1.0           1.5          2.0
 Medtronic CardioVascular                                         1,000                                           0.42                                                SAA             CA           U.S.
 Amy’s Kitchen                                                      988                         0.40
 Wells Fargo                                                        916                                                                               Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics, avg 2012-2016
 Lagunitas Brewing Co.                                              900
 Jackson Family Wine                                                800
                                                                                                0.20                                                                        EXPORTS
 Cyan                                                               700                         0.00                                                  Product                                               $ mil
 Walmart Inc.                                                       650                                                                               Food and kindred products                               ND
                                                                                                         Least Diverse
 Hansel Auto Group                                                  600
                                                                                          EMPLOYMENT VOLATILITY                                       Chemicals                                             113.9
 AT&T                                                               600
                                                                                                                                                      Primary metal manufacturing                             ND
 Lucky                                                              550     Due to U.S. fluctuations                     Relative to U.S.
 Santa Rosa Community Health Centers                                523     100                                                                       Fabricated metal products                              88.8
 PG&E                                                               500                                                                               Machinery, except electrical                         204.9
 Petaluma Acquisitions                                              455      80
                                                                                                                                                      Computer and electronic products                     454.5
 Ghilotti Construction Co.                                          425                                                                               Transportation equipment                                ND
 Sources: North Bay Business Journal Book of Lists, 2017, San Francisco
                                                                                                                                                      Miscellaneous manufacturing                             ND
                                                                             60
 Business Journal Book of Lists, 2017                                                                                                                 Other products                                       289.9
                                                                                                                         201
                                                                             40
                                                                                              89%                                                     Total                                               1,231.7

                               PUBLIC                                                                                                                 Destination                                           $ mil
                                                                             20                                                           100         Africa                                                   7.8
 Federal                                                          1,344
 State                                                            3,824                                                                               Asia                                                  573.9
 Local                                                           24,476          0                                                                    European Union                                         231.1
                                                                                                                             SAA          U.S.
                                                                                                                                                      Canada & Mexico                                       256.5
 2019                                                                            Not due to U.S.    Due to U.S.
                                                                                                                                                      South America                                           17.9
                                     COMPARATIVE EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME                                                                                Rest of world                                         144.5
                                                                                                                                                      Total                                               1,231.7
                                                       % OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT                            AVERAGE ANNUAL EARNINGS
 Sector                                                 SON                CA           U.S.                 SON                CA     U.S.             % of GDP                                               3.6
 Mining                                                    0.1             0.1            0.5             $18,208          $66,127 $103,785             Rank among all metro areas                            230
 Construction                                              7.3             5.0           4.9               $87,051        $78,900 $68,455             Sources: BEA, International Trade Administration, Moody’s
 Manufacturing                                           11.2              7.7            8.5             $85,039        $108,759 $83,365             Analytics, 2018
   Durable                                              36.4              63.9          62.6                    nd       $124,251 $86,331                              PRODUCTIVITY
                                                                                                                                                                       PRODUCTIVITY
   Nondurable                                           63.6              36.1          37.4                    nd        $83,145 $78,483
                                                                                                                                                                REAL OUTPUT PER WORKER, $
 Transportation/Utilities                                 2.0              3.9           4.0              $56,625         $57,283 $60,890
 Wholesale Trade                                          3.6              4.1            3.9             $79,235          $91,917 $88,316
 Retail Trade                                            11.9              9.8          10.6              $41,962         $42,493 $35,245
 Information                                              1.3              3.2            1.9            $103,418        $184,240 $119,417
 Financial Activities                                     4.3              4.9            5.8             $49,575         $68,248 $59,540
                                                                                                                                                           98,630            112,380
 Prof. and Bus. Services                                  11.1            15.5           14.1              $57,455        $82,844   $71,767                                                      92,845
 Educ. and Health Services                               16.7             15.9          15.9              $60,237          $57,703 $56,400
 Leisure and Hosp. Services                              12.3             11.6          10.9              $29,881         $36,319   $29,108
 Other Services                                           3.4              3.3            3.9              $51,143        $42,403 $38,639
                                                                                                                                                                     SAA            CA            U.S.
 Government                                              14.9             15.0           15.1             $84,580         $98,813 $78,273
 Sources: Percent of total employment — BLS, Moody’s Analytics, 2018, Average annual earnings — BEA, Moody’s Analytics, 2017                          Sources: BEA, Moody’s Analytics, 2018

                        BUSINESS COSTS                                                                                                           LEADING INDUSTRIES BY WAGE TIER
                                    U.S.=100                                                         TECH
                                                                                                                                                                                           Location Employees
                                                                                                EMPLOYMENT                                NAICS Industry                                   Quotient      (ths)
                      Total
                                                                                                       Ths        % of total              6221    General medical and surgical hospitals         0.7               4.3
                                                                                                                                   HIGH

                                                                                                                                          6214    Outpatient care centers                        3.6               4.2
                Unit labor                                                             SAA               9.3         4.4
                                                                                                                                          6211    Offices of physicians                          0.7               2.6
                                                                                       U.S.         7,498.9          5.0                  5511    Management of companies & enterprises          0.7               2.3
                   Energy
                                                                                                                                          GVL     Local Government                               1.3              25.3
                                                                                                         TED                              3121    Beverage manufacturing                        24.8               8.0
                                                                                                                                   MID

 State and local taxes                                                                                                                    GVS     State Government                               0.7               5.0
                                                                                                EMPLOYMENT
                                                                                                                                          2382    Building equipment contractors                 1.0               2.9
               Office rent                                                                               Ths        % of total              7225    Restaurants and other eating places             1.1             16.4
                                                                                       SAA              27.9        13.2                  6241    Individual and family services                 2.4               7.6
                                                                                                                                   LOW

                                0       50      100       150       200    250                                                            4451    Grocery stores                                 1.7               6.4
                                                                                       U.S.        14,552.2          9.6
                                           2012              2017                                                                         FR      Farms                                          1.6               6.1

 Source: Moody’s Analytics                                                              Source: Moody’s Analytics, 2019            Source: Moody’s Analytics, 2019

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Metro / April 2020                                                            PG. 8
PRÉCIS® U.S. METRO • Sonoma County CA

                                                         SKILLS MISMATCH
                                                                MISM                                                                                   MIGRATION FLOWS
                            % OF TOTAL                                                                                                            INTO SONOMA COUNTY CA
  Less than HS
                                                                                                                                                                                       Number of
                                                                            Undereducated           Balanced         Overeducated                                                       Migrants
   High School                                                                                                                            San Rafael CA                                       1,811
                                                                                             SON                   U.S.
                                                                                                                                          San Francisco CA                                    1,413
 Some College
                                                                                                                                          Oakland CA                                          1,316
    Associate’s                                                                                   T
                                                                        ECONOMIC DISENFRANCHISEMENT                                       Sacramento CA                                         661
       Bachelor’s                                                                                                                         Los Angeles CA                                        581
                                                                        Index                                     2018           Rank*
                                                                                                                                          San Jose CA                                           458
        Graduate                                                        Gini coefficient                          0.46             197
                                                                                                                                          Napa CA                                               451
                                                                        Palma ratio                                 3.2            152
                                                                                                                                          Vallejo CA                                            377
                        0       5    10        15   20     25     30    Poverty rate                             10.1%             331
                                                                                                                                          San Diego CA                                          292
                                                                        *Most unequal=1, Most equal=403                                   Riverside CA                                          240
                Occupations           Population
 Sources: Census Bureau, ACS, Moody’s Analytics, 2018                                                                                     Total in-migration                                 13,891
                                                                                   HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME, %
                PER CAPITA INCOME                                                                                                                 FROM SONOMA COUNTY CA
                                                                                 0-19,999                                                 Sacramento CA                                       1,543
                                    $ THS                                  20,000-39,999
  70                                                                                                                                      San Rafael CA                                       1,238
                                                                           40,000-59,999                                                  Oakland CA                                          1,108
  65
                                                                           60,000-74,999                                                  San Francisco CA                                      834
  60
                                                                           75,000-99,999
                                                                                                                                          Vallejo CA                                            705
  55                                                                                                                                      Napa CA                                               582
                                                                        100,000-124,999
  50                                                                                                                                      Los Angeles CA                                        492
                                                                        125,000-149,999                                                   San Diego CA                                          383
  45
                                                                        150,000-199,999                                                   Portland OR                                           365
  40
                                                                                 200,000+                                                 San Jose CA                                           364
  35
                                                                                                                                          Total out-migration                                18,756
        09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
                                                                                                0       5          10      15        20
                 SAA                                                                                                                      Net migration                                     -4,865
   2019      SON $68,530             CACA
                                        $66,661      U.S.
                                                      U.S. $56,663                                   SON                  U.S.
 Sources: BEA, Moody’s Analytics                                        Sources: Census Bureau, ACS, Moody’s Analytics, 2018
                                                                                                                                                        NET
                                                                                                                                                        Net  MIGRATION,
                                                                                                                                                            Migration, SAA #
                                                         COMMUTER FL
                                                                  FLOWS
            RESIDENTS WHO WORK IN SON                                             WORKERS WHO LIVE IN S SON                                 1,000
                                                                                                                                                  0
                                                                                                                                           -1,000

                                                                                                                                           -2,000
                                                                                                                                           -3,000
                                    83.2%                                                           91.7%
                                                                                                                                           -4,000
 Top Five Outside Sources of Jobs                                       Top Five Outside Sources of Workers                                -5,000
 Sonoma County CA                                               Share   Sonoma County CA                                         Share                     16          17         18          19
 San Rafael CA                                                    7.4   San Rafael CA                                               2.1
                                                                                                                                                            2016        2017        2018        2019
 San Francisco CA                                                 3.3   Vallejo CA                                                 1.3
                                                                                                                                          Domestic           130       -1,061     -4,202      -4,534
 Napa CA                                                          1.9   Napa CA                                                    1.0
 Oakland CA                                                       1.7   Oakland CA                                                 0.9    Foreign            708          361         74          97
 Vallejo CA                                                       0.5   San Francisco CA                                           0.5    Total              838         -700     -4,128      -4,437

 Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics, avg 2009-2013                                                                                 Sources: IRS (top), 2018, Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics

        GENERATIONAL BREAKDOWN                                                 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT                                                 POPULATION BY AGE, %
           POPULATION BY GENERATION, %                                             % OF ADULTS 25 AND OLDER                                 ≥75
                                                                                                                                          70-74
                                                                           100                                                            65-69
          Gen Z                                                                            14               13              13            60-64
                                                                            80                                                            55-59
                                                                                           22               21              20
       Millennial                                                                                                                         50-54
                                                                            60                                                            45-49
                                                                                                            29              29            40-44
          Gen X                                                             40             34                                             35-39
                                                                                                                                          30-34
                                                                            20                              21              27            25-29
   Baby Boom                                                                               18                                             20-24
                                                                                           11               16              12            15-19
        Silent &                                                             0
                                                                                                                                          10-14
        Greatest                                                                        SON                 CA              U.S.            5-9
                                                                                       < High school                High school             0-4
                    0       5       10         15   20     25     30
                                                                                       Some college                 College
                                                                                                                                                  0             2           4          6           8
                                         SAA        U.S.                               Graduate school                                                          SON               U.S.
 Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics, 2018                        Sources: Census Bureau, ACS, Moody’s Analytics, 2018              Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics, 2018

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Metro / April 2020                                                   PG. 9
PRÉCIS® U.S. METRO • Sonoma County CA

                                                      GEOGRAPHIC PROFILE
                                                       POPULATION DENSITY

                          MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME                           POPULATION & HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
                                                                                                                  Units                      Value Rank*
                                                                    Total area                                    sq mi                    1,767.9        202
                                                                      Total water area                            sq mi                       192.1        97
                                                                      Total land area                             sq mi                    1,575.8        211
                                                                        Land area - developable                   sq mi                      847.7        185
                                                                        Land area - undevelopable                 sq mi                      728.1        169

                                                                    Population density                 pop. to developable land              581.8        109
                                                                    Total population                              ths                        494.3        126
                                                                      U.S. citizen at birth                % of population                    81.8        345
                                                                      Naturalized U.S. citizen             % of population                      7.1        61
                                                                      Not a U.S. citizen                   % of population                     9.8         46

                              AVERAGE COMMUTE TIME                  Median age                                                                42.4          59

                                                                    Total housing units                            ths                       205.2        130
                                                                      Owner occupied                            % of total                    56.1        243
                                                                      Renter occupied                           % of total                    35.2         78
                                                                      Vacant                                    % of total                     8.7        276

                          COMING SOON                                   1-unit, detached                        % of total                     65.8       217
                                                                        1-unit, attached                        % of total                      7.8        57
                                                                     Multifamily                                % of total                     21.1       193
                                                                    Median year built                                                         1978
                                                                    * Areas & pop. density, out of 410 metro areas/divisions, including metros in Puerto Rico;
                                                                    all others, out of 403 metros.
                                                                    Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics, 2018 except land area 2010

 Sources: ACS, Moody’s Analytics

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Metro / April 2020            PG. 10
BROAD VIEW �� Executive Summary

COVID-19: Global Economic Tsunami
BY MARK ZANDI

    COVID-19 has created a worldwide                to an economy. Chinese GDP is on track to                             Wave three will be a sharp pullback in
economic tsunami. The global economy is             decline by 29% at an annualized rate in the                       business investment. Businesses were al-
engulfed in a serious downturn. The virus           first quarter.                                                    ready on edge from the trade war between
has caused significant parts of the Asian and           U.S. businesses immediately laid off                          the U.S. and China, Brexit, and a long list of
now European and U.S. economies to all but          workers. Initial claims for unemployment                          other geopolitical concerns. But the virus
shut down (see Chart 1). More financial pain        insurance spiked from about 210,000 in the                        will be too much to bear. Investment in the
is quickly coming as layoffs mount, busi-           first week of March to nearly 3.3 million                         energy industry is already falling because
nesses curtail investment, and retirement           the week of March 16, and 6.6 million the                         of the collapse in oil prices. That collapse is
nest eggs evaporate. Central banks have             week of March 23. As there are numerous                           due in part to the global recession as well
responded aggressively but are running out          reports of laid-off workers unable to file for                    as the brinkmanship between Saudi Arabia
of room to maneuver as interest rates hit           UI because so many people are trying to file                      and Russia that prompted the Saudis to
the zero-lower bound. The onus is now on            at the same time, more job losses will be                         ramp up oil production. A surge in business
governments to quickly provide substantial          recorded in coming weeks, particularly for                        bankruptcies and failures is surely coming.
financial support to hard-pressed house-            households that live paycheck to paycheck.                        It will further exacerbate the investment
holds and businesses. How much economic             A survey conducted by the Federal Reserve                         decline and be an impediment to the future
damage COVID-19 ultimately does will de-            last year found that almost half of Ameri-                        economic recovery.
pend on the trajectory of the virus—and how         cans effectively live paycheck to paycheck.
governments respond.                                    The second wave of the economic                               Dark global outlook
                                                    tsunami will hit when the other half of                               Our darkening outlook for the global
Economic tsunami                                    households come to terms with their much-                         economy is struggling to keep up with the
    The economic tsunami that hit China and         diminished wealth. Losses in the U.S. stock                       growing magnitude of the crisis. We have
much of Asia earlier in the year and hit Eu-        market are more than $10 trillion, depend-                        long been wary of the economy’s growth
rope a few weeks ago is now slamming the            ing on the day and hour, down about one-                          prospects this year and the threats to that
U.S. economy as increasingly more parts of          third from the peak in stock values just a few                    growth, but COVID-19 has resulted in
the country require nonessential businesses         weeks ago. The negative wealth effects—the                        consistent substantial downgrades to the
to shut down. This sudden stop in the econ-         change in consumer spending in response                           outlook. In January, prior to the virus, we
omy is unprecedented. The only analogue             to a loss of wealth—will be substantial. The                      expected global real GDP growth of 2.6%
is the 9/11 terrorist attack. But that lasted       baby boom cohort, now in its 50s and 60s                          in 2020 (see Chart 2). This is close to the
for a day or two, and except for airlines,          and owning more than half of all stocks, will                     global economy’s estimated growth poten-
businesses continued to operate. China’s            turn particularly cautious. If sustained, the                     tial, and thus unemployment was expected
experience with COVID-19 demonstrates               loss of stock wealth will by itself reduce GDP                    to remain low and stable. With the virus
the economic devastation the disease brings         over the coming year by an estimated 2%.                          now shutting down travel, trade and many

 Economic Costs Are Quickly Adding Up                                                  Unprecedented Global Economic Downturn…
 U.S. cumulative lost output, % of GDP, SAAR                                           2020 economic outlook
  0

 -1

 -2

 -3
   Up to 3/15       3/17     3/19    3/21          3/23           3/25                                                            Recession

 Source: Moody’s Analytics                                                             Source: Moody’s Analytics

                                                COVID-19: Economic Scenarios   1                                                              COVID-19: Economic Scenarios   2

                                                                                   PG. 11                          MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Macro / April 2020
BROAD VIEW �� Executive Summary

businesses, the global economy is expected                  economy nearly a percentage point in GDP,                         it may not be pessimistic enough. There are
to suffer with real GDP falling by 4.2% (see                and the losses are mounting rapidly. U.S.                         three critical known unknowns: the trajec-
Chart 3).                                                   real GDP is expected to decline by 5.8% this                      tory of the virus, the policy response, and
    Europe will be especially hard-hit since                year. A massive and mounting monetary and                         what other problems may develop due to
it has been unable to contain the spread of                 fiscal policy response will limit the economic                    the extraordinary pressure on the economy
the virus. Italy has had the most serious out-              damage compared with much of the rest of                          and financial system. Numerous and far
break so far, but all of Europe’s major econo-              the world. The Federal Reserve’s aggressive                       darker economic scenarios are possible de-
mies have closed borders and schools and                    actions should stabilize credit and equity                        pending on how these—and other unknown
quarantined large parts of their populations.               markets, and President Trump signed a $2                          unknowns—play out.
The European economy was fragile before                     trillion fiscal stimulus bill—deficit-financed                        In the U.S., an increasingly tenuous as-
the virus hit—it returned only recently to full             increases in government spending and tax                          sumption is that, while the virus will not
employment after a decade-long struggle in                  cuts—equal to nearly 10% of GDP. Even so,                         play out nearly as well as in South Korea,
the wake of the financial crisis. Europe is also            U.S. real GDP will decline.                                       it will not be as bad as in Italy. The Korean
struggling to muster an economic policy                          Asia appears past the worst of the virus,                    government and healthcare system have
response. The Bank of England recently                      and while there is still considerable eco-                        managed the crisis well, while the Italians
lowered rates to the zero lower bound and                   nomic fallout to come, the region’s economy                       have been overwhelmed. To date, the U.S.
the European Central Bank has maintained                    should be able to eke out a small gain in                         federal government’s crisis management
negative rates since the crisis. Germany and                GDP this year. After cratering in the first                       efforts have been poor—the lack of testing
the U.K. are implementing large fiscal stimu-               quarter, China’s economy is staging a strong                      kits is symptomatic—suggesting the virus
lus packages, but the rest of Europe has little             comeback. Barring a return of the virus, Chi-                     will be more widespread and result in more
fiscal space to respond. Euro zone real GDP                 na should be fully up and running later this                      hospitalizations and deaths than had been
is expected to decline by 7% in 2020.                       year. Of course, with global travel still large-                  assumed. Indeed, the recent spike in new in-
    Emerging economies will be hammered                     ly shut down and the global economy strug-                        fections in the U.S. suggests that the trajec-
given the collapse in oil and other commod-                 gling to revive, the Asian economy will not                       tory of the virus may be even more serious
ity prices, which are staples for many Latin                get into full gear until next year. The ability                   than in Italy (see Chart 4).
American, Middle Eastern and African econ-                  of Asian governments to quickly and effec-
omies. The price of a barrel of West Texas                  tively lock down their infected populations                       Policymakers break glass
Intermediate has slumped on weaker global                   has allowed them to restart their economies                          Global central banks and governments
demand as well as the Saudi-Russian brink-                  more quickly and to limit the damage to the                       are rapidly ramping up their response to the
manship. EM economies are also struggling                   region’s longer-term growth prospects.                            health and economic crisis. Central banks
with the flight-to-quality and the appreciat-                                                                                 are slashing interest rates, engaging in sub-
ing U.S. dollar. This is especially problematic             Epidemiological assumptions                                       stantially more quantitative easing, provid-
for countries such as Hong Kong and Saudi                      Our baseline outlook for the global econ-                      ing substantial liquidity to financial markets,
Arabia that peg their currencies to the dollar.             omy is increasingly pessimistic. Still, given                     and reducing capital requirements for their
    The U.S. economy will also suffer sig-                  how quickly events are moving and the high                        banks. Governments are declaring states of
nificantly. Lockdowns have already cost the                 degree of uncertainty around the virus’ path,                     emergency, appropriating funds to address

…That Is Intensifying                                                                             U.S. Cases Double Every 3-4 Days
Real GDP growth, annualized % change                                                              # of COVID-19 cases, days since 100 confirmed cases, log-scale
                                 2020Q1   2020Q2   2020Q3   2020Q4      2019     2020             100,000
     World
                  January base
                  March base
                                    2.7
                                    0.7
                                             2.9
                                             1.6
                                                     2.7
                                                     3.5
                                                               2.6
                                                               2.8
                                                                         2.5
                                                                         2.4
                                                                                   2.6
                                                                                   1.9
                                                                                                                  Italy
                  April base      -10.9    -22.1    19.9       4.5       2.4      -4.2             10,000         S. Korea
                  January base      1.5      2.2     1.5       1.2       2.3       1.8
  United States   March base        1.1     -0.4     1.7       2.4       2.3       1.3                            U.S.
                  April base       -8.1    -30.2    16.6       0.4       2.3      -5.8
                  January base      7.2     6.6      5.5       5.8       6.1       6.2              1,000
      China       March base       -0.9     5.1     11.4       5.8       6.1       4.4                                                      Day 1 dates
                  April base      -29.0    14.9     27.7      13.0       6.1      -0.1                                                Italy           Feb 22
                  January base      2.0     2.4     2.5       2.6        1.1      2.2                  100
      Brazil      March base        1.3     2.0     2.5       2.6        1.1      2.0                                                 S. Korea        Feb 19
                  April base       -8.8    -24.3     0.4       7.0       1.1      -6.1                                                U.S.            March 3
                  January base      1.2     1.1      1.1       1.1       1.3       1.0
 United Kingdom   March base        0.6     0.5      1.2       1.1       1.4       0.7                  10
                  April base       -3.0    -36.7    25.8       5.8       1.4      -5.6
                  January base      1.4     1.5      1.8       1.4       1.2       1.3
   Euro Zone      March base        0.7     0.8      1.2       1.3       1.2       0.8                   1
                  April base      -14.8    -40.0    59.3      1.6        1.2      -7.0
                                                                                                             0   2    4   6   8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
Source: Moody’s Analytics                                                                         Sources: Johns Hopkins CSSE COVID-19 Data Repository, Moody’s Analytics

                                                       COVID-19: Economic Scenarios      3                                                             COVID-19: Economic Scenarios   4

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Macro / April 2020                                      PG. 12
BROAD VIEW �� Executive Summary

Stress in Corporate Debt Markets                                                       than $8 billion via        own lending, the impact on the economy will
                                                                                       the first tranche of       be severe and immediate.
 Option-adjusted high yield spreads, %
                                                                                       stimulus, $90 bil-             The high level of corporate debt is anoth-
 25
                                                                                       lion in the second         er threat (see Chart 5). There are many large
                          Europe           U.S.
 20                                                                                    tranche, and $50           multinationals with strong balance sheets
                                                                                       billion freed up with      and little debt, but there are also many
 15                                                                                    President Trump’s          highly leveraged companies that will likely
                                                                                       emergency decla-           face a Hobson’s choice: make their debt pay-
 10
                                                                                       ration. The third          ments in a timely way or cut payrolls and
   5                                                                                   tranche is $2 trillion     investment. Either way the economy will suf-
                                                                                       in stimulus including      fer. We assume these financial fault lines are
   0                                                                                   direct payments to         not severe or persistent enough to materially
  Jan-08      Jan-10      Jan-12       Jan-14       Jan-16        Jan-18       Jan-20
                                                                                       individuals, expand-       weaken the economy. However, this is an in-
 Sources: Bloomberg Index Services Limited, Moody’s Analytics
                                                                                       ed unemployment            creasingly tough assumption to make.
                                                        COVID-19: Economic Scenarios 5 insurance benefits,
the health crisis and providing discretionary                 loans and loan guarantees to small busi-            Dark scenarios
fiscal stimulus that includes more govern-                    nesses, and support for hard-pressed                    COVID-19 is an unprecedented global
ment spending and tax cuts.                                   companies. These measures are in addi-              pandemic and economic shock. Economies
     In the U.S., the Fed has reduced the                     tion to the so-called automatic stabilizers         around the globe are shutting down, and the
federal funds rate to the zero lower bound,                   built into the tax code and government              sudden halt to business is resulting in serious
restarted quantitative easing, lowered re-                    programs. Even more fiscal stimulus is              economic and financial damage. It is not dif-
serve requirements for banks, and is provid-                  increasingly likely.                                ficult to construct very dark scenarios—each
ing substantial liquidity to credit markets                                                                       darker than the last. With the epidemiology
via a number of financial-crisis-era credit                   Financial fault lines                               of the virus all but impossible to gauge, these
facilities resurrected in recent days. We as-                     Our baseline outlook also depends on            dark scenarios cannot be ruled out.
sume that a new, much larger credit facility                  credit markets functioning reasonably well,             While our baseline outlook has turned
will soon be established to support lending                   albeit with significant support from the            quickly more pessimistic, the recession that
to businesses via the banking system, and                     Federal Reserve. Liquidity in credit markets        now engulfs the world ultimately should
potentially to certain non-bank financial                     has become increasingly impaired, including         not be as severe as the financial crisis nor,
institutions that are critical to credit flows                the repo and commercial paper markets. If           certainly, as terrible as the Great Depression.
to businesses.                                                liquidity dries up, and short-term funding          However, the scenario that comes to pass
     Discretionary fiscal stimulus in the U.S.                markets effectively close to large corporates       will depend critically on how effective global
is assumed to ultimately total at least $2.2 that issue short-term debt and financial in-                         policymakers are in containing the virus and
trillion. Already appropriated was more                       stitutions that raise funds necessary for their     responding to the economic fallout.

                                                                                 PG. 13                         MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Macro / April 2020
BROAD VIEW

Forecast Assumptions
BY MARK ZANDI

Monetary policy                                               Long-term Treasury yields have also fallen            U.S. dollar
      The Federal Reserve is aggressively respond-        sharply, as global capital has poured into the                The U.S. dollar remains strong, although the
ing to the economic fallout of COVID-19. It has           safety of the U.S. Treasury market. Ten-year              Fed’s emergency actions have diminished some
slashed the federal funds rate to the zero lower          Treasury yields have declined to record lows              of that strength. On a real broad trade-weight-
bound, reduced bank reserve requirements,                 and are currently around 70 basis points.                 ed basis the dollar remains more than half a
provided trillions of dollars in liquidity to short-          The Fed is expected to manage long-term rates         standard deviation above its long-run average
term funding markets, and restarted quantita-             so they remain between 50 and 100 basis points            since it began to freely float in the early 1970s.
tive easing through purchases of Treasuries and           while the crisis is in full swing. If rates rise much         The value of the U.S. dollar is expected to
agency mortgage backed securities and will                above this, the Fed will ramp up QE; if rates fall        remain strong, since the virus will do more
soon be buying municipal securities.                      much below this the Fed will tamp down QE. Long-          damage to the global economy than to the
      Most significantly, the Fed has stood up a num-     term rates should rise to near 200 basis points by        U.S. economy. The Chinese and European
ber of credit facilities to support different parts of    the end of 2021 and back to their estimated long-         economies will be especially hard hit.
the credit market. These include facilities that were     run equilibrium of 400 basis points by mid-decade.            Other geopolitical uncertainties, includ-
used during the financial crisis, such as a commer-                                                                 ing the unresolved U.S. trade war with China
cial paper facility and a facility to support money       Fiscal policy                                             and the Brexit transition, will also continue
market funds, and a new facility to provide help to            Lawmakers have rapidly implemented                   to fuel a global flight to the safe haven pro-
the struggling corporate bond market.                     three rounds of fiscal policy measures to                 vided by U.S. assets, and support the dollar.
      The Fed’s efforts have been successful in           cushion the blow from COVID-19. The cost
keeping credit markets open, at least so far.             of these policy measures is an estimated                  Energy prices
Credit spreads have gapped out and new                    $2.4 trillion, equal to well over 10% of GDP.                 The global recession and collapse in global
issuance has been severely impaired, but                  This is approximately equal to the cost of all            oil demand and the brinkmanship between
credit is still flowing. This is critical to ensure       of the fiscal stimulus measures adopted dur-              Saudi Arabia and Russia over who should
that the economic crisis created by the virus             ing and after the financial crisis.                       shoulder the oil production cuts have pum-
does not become even more serious.                             This wide-ranging fiscal support includes signifi-   meled oil prices. The price for a barrel of West
      Looming downgrades in the corporate                 cantly expanded unemployment insurance bene-              Texas Intermediate was near $25 per barrel.
bond market will further test the Fed’s ability           fits, tax rebate checks to lower- and middle-income           Oil prices are expected to get a lift when
to manage the turmoil in financial markets.               households, and funds for hard-pressed state and          the Saudis and Russians come to terms on pro-
Downgrades of investment grade companies                  local government and the healthcare system.               duction cuts. Given the extraordinary financial
to below invest grade will ignite selling by                   It also provides financial support to busi-          pressure on both countries, we expect at least a
investment funds that are required to hold                nesses. Measures include expanded small                   tentative resolution by mid-year. Oil prices are
only investment grade debt. Collateralized                business lending, direct bailout funds for the            expected to end the year close to $40 per barrel.
loan obligation managers will also be forced              airlines and other companies deemed critical                  Oil prices should rebound closer to their estimated
to sell loans that are downgraded to C rat-               to national security, and funds to stand up               long-run equilibrium level of $55 per barrel by late
ings. A self-reinforcing vicious cycle of selling         a credit facility that will provide loans, loan           2021 once the impact of the virus on the global econ-
leading to lower bond prices leading to more              guarantees and other help to companies.                   omy has passed.The equilibrium price is the cost of
selling could be set off.                                      Even more fiscal support will be neces-              producing and transporting oil from U.S. shale fields to
      The Fed will also likely need to lower              sary, with a fourth stimulus package expect-              global markets. U.S. shale producers are currently sup-
capital and liquidity requirements for the                ed later this year, although the Presidential             plying the last barrel of oil to the global marketplace.
banks they regulate. With the banking sys-                election may complicate the timing.
tem being asked to provide forbearance to                      The nation’s budget deficit will balloon to          COVID-19
their household and corporate borrowers,                  close to $2.5 trillion this year, and over $2 tril-           COVID-19 is doing significant damage to the
the Fed will also need to show forbearance                lion next. The nation’s debt-to-GDP ratio will            global economy, which is now engulfed in a serious
to the banks.                                             surge to near 100% more than a decade sooner              recession. While the worst of the economic fallout
      The Fed’s emergency measures are expected           than expected prior to the virus. Lawmaker are            from the virus is expected through this summer,
to remain in place for the most part through 2021.        appropriately not focused on all the red ink giv-         without a vaccine or medical treatment for the
The zero interest rate policy will remain in place un-    en the need to respond to the crisis. But, once           virus, travel, tourism and trade will remain impaired
til it is clear the economy will return to full employ-   the virus is in the history books, addressing the         and the global economy will continue to struggle.
ment, which is not expected until late 2022.              nation’s fragile fiscal situation will be critical.       We are anticipating a vaccine by summer 2021.

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Macro / April 2020                                PG. 14
BROAD VIEW

Forecast Risks
BY MICHAEL FERLEZ

 COVID-19                                            in stimulus. While the monetary policy has         increase in corporate borrowing and subse-
    The COVID-19 pandemic presents an                 worked to stabilize the financial system, the      quent rise in corporate leverage have made
unprecedented test of the global economy.             fiscal response provides essential assistance      corporations more exposed to slowing eco-
In the U.S., nearly the entire country is under       to individuals and small-business owners hit       nomic growth. With the operations of many
some form of lockdown, leading to the loss            hardest by the coronavirus.                        businesses disrupted by government-man-
of millions of jobs and billions in lost eco-             While further actions will likely be needed,   dated shutdowns, the financial strain could
nomic output. In the Moody’s Analytics April          Congress and the Fed have demonstrated a           spur a tidal wave of defaults. The Fed’s newly
baseline forecast, U.S. real GDP declines 8%          strong willingness to take whatever actions        minted facility to purchase corporate debt
at an annualized rate in the first quarter and        are necessary. Herculean fiscal and monetary       will help, but it remains to be seen how much
a staggering 30% in the second quarter. The           support will without a doubt help mitigate         it can do for non-investment-grade compa-
baseline forecast assumes that COVID-19               the fallout from the virus and could set the       nies that are most at risk. A wave of defaults
infections peak in May, with economic activ-          stage for a stronger than expected recovery.       would not just add significantly to the stress
ity beginning to gradually return to normal           Clearly, the immense size of the stimulus          in the financial system; the negative impacts
over the subsequent months. However, with             carries longer-term risks, primarily over their    would also seep into the real economy, cost-
the pandemic still not yet contained, it is           cost and how the programs are eventually           ing more jobs and lost output.
impossible to rule out a much more dire               wound down. However, these risks pale in
scenario that pushes the economy into a               comparison to the costs of doing nothing.           Oil
deeper recession. Furthermore, until a vac-                                                                  The U.S. oil market has showed some
cine becomes widely available, the threat of           China struggles                                  signs of improvement, but the outlook for
future outbreaks remains a possibility. While             The Chinese economy is starting to come        U.S. oil producers remains grim. The recently
the world is likely to be better prepared for         back on line, but risks of another slowdown        announced OPEC+ production cuts will help
another outbreak, the damage to consumer              remain elevated. Across China, factories have      prices, though the enormous uncertainty
confidence and investor psyche could still be         begun to reopen, and workers have started          created by COVID-19 still poses a significant
enough to slow or even derail the recovery.           returning. However, growth is subdued so           downside risk to the struggling U.S. oil in-
    Trauma caused by COVID-19 also could              far, and coronavirus fears remain high. China      dustry. The longer current conditions persist,
result in a weaker than expected recovery.            has controlled the domestic spread of the vi-      the slower it will take oil prices to recover,
Still more damaging would be a permanent              rus, but danger is high that the virus gets re-    resulting in a greater hit to employment and
change in consumer behavior leading to                introduced from abroad, making consumers           nonresidential fixed investment.
lasting disruptions of certain industries, per-       cautious. Additionally, the world economy is
petuating job losses and income inequality.           in a much different place than when China           Trade
                                                      closed its economy. The decline in global de-          Although trade tensions have moved off
ÅStimulus                                            mand for Chinese goods coupled with weak           the front page, they remain an obstacle as
   Record-setting amounts of fiscal and               domestic demand could cause economic               the global economy shifts into recession. As
monetary stimulus will help the U.S.                  growth to fall short of expectations, resulting    part of the partial U.S.-China trade deal, the
economy through the dark days ahead.                  in a deeper global recession.                      U.S. canceled new tariffs that were set to
On the monetary side, the Federal Reserve                                                                go into effect in December and promised to
has reopened its crisis-era playbook with              Corporate debt                                   roll back existing tariffs in phases. In return,
the addition of some powerful new plays,                  Rising corporate debt levels pose a serious    China agreed to several concessions, includ-
including facilities to purchase commercial           downside risk as the global economy moves          ing the purchase of more U.S. agricultural
mortgage-backed securities and corporate              into recession. In the aftermath of the finan-     products. However, at this point, most of
bonds and the ability to lend to select small         cial crisis, record low interest rates provided    the existing U.S. and Chinese tariffs remain
businesses. The Fed’s actions have bolstered          corporations with a cheap source of capital,       in place. The barriers created by tariffs could
the financial system, stabilizing asset prices        resulting in a boom in corporate debt issu-        exacerbate the recession, inflicting more
and restoring confidence.                             ance. Globally, outstanding corporate debt         damage to trade-dependent industries.
   Fiscal policies have been equally extraor-         doubled in the decade from 2008 to 2018.           Trade policy uncertainty could return as a
dinary. In March, Congress passed the Coro-           In the U.S., nonfinancial corporate debt—in-       major downside risk later this year. If Presi-
navirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security            cluding debt securities and loans—as a share       dent Trump wins reelection, he could double
(CARES) Act, providing more than $2 trillion          of GDP is at a record high of 47%. The rapid       down on his efforts and reignite a trade war.

MOODY’S ANALYTICS / Précis® U.S. Macro / April 2020
                                                                             PG. 15
SONOMAEDB.ORG

                        707 - 565 - 7170

141 STONY CIRCLE, STE. 110, SANTA ROSA, CA 95401
You can also read