MethodsJ2: a software tool to capture metadata and generate comprehensive microscopy methods text

Page created by Teresa Curry
 
CONTINUE READING
FOCUS | correspondence
                                                                                         FOCUS | correspondence
MethodsJ2: a software tool to capture metadata
and generate comprehensive microscopy
methods text
To the Editor — Proper reporting of
metadata is essential to reproduce               1    Create a Micro-Meta App microscope.JSON file.                              Hardware metadata
microscopy experiments, interpret results
and share images1,2. The lack of methods
reporting in microscopy is evident in that       2    Download MethodsJ2 script. Install Fiji/ImageJ if needed.
few research articles pass a test for the
minimal information required to reproduce
experiments1 (about 17% of 240 articles
                                                 3    Run the MethodsJ2 script.
containing 1,500 figures with images).
The problem is compounded by the number
and variety of microscope modalities,                 Open the microscope image and select a Microscope.JSON
                                                                                                                                   Image metadata
options and associated components.               4
                                                      hardware configuration file.                                           OMERO OME TIFF metadata
Automation has distanced researchers
from the technical parameters, so it can be
difficult for them to know what information      5
                                                      The user is guided... through selection of hardware and
                                                      settings information.
                                                                                                                              Guided by imaging scientist
needs to be reported. MethodsJ2 is an
ImageJ/Fiji-based software tool that aims to
improve reproducibility in microscopy                 Draft imaging methods section text is generated. Text should
by capturing image metadata from                      be reviewed and modified as needed.

multiple sources, consolidating it and           6
automatically generating methods text                 Automated generation of microscopy platform
for publication.                                      acknowledgement.
                                                                                                                                Research resource ID

   To properly evaluate and reproduce
microscopy images, information about
sample preparation, experimental                Fig. 1 | MethodsJ2 workflow overview. Steps required to automatically generate microscopy methods
conditions, microscope hardware, image          text. Image metadata are collected from the microscope image acquisition software metadata in
acquisition settings and image analysis         the image file using the OME TIFF tools. Hardware metadata are collected from a Micro-Meta App
parameters is required. This information is     Microscope.JSON file.
called metadata and is defined as ‘a set of
data that describes and gives information
about other data’. Researchers involved in      education around microscopy metadata                        facility impact, acknowledgement text,
the 4D Nucleome initiative3 and Bioimaging      and straightforward accessible tools are                    including a facility Research Resource ID
North America (BINA) (https://www.              vital for successful implementation of such                 (RRID, https://scicrunch.org/resources) can
bioimagingna.org/) have developed               guidelines. MethodsJ2 is an extensible,                     be added to the script. The methods text is
extensive community-driven specifications       open-source microscopy methods reporting                    then automatically generated but must be
for microscopy metadata4,5. These               software tool that runs in ImageJ/Fiji and                  reviewed and edited.
specifications build on a previous Open         builds on MethodsJ1,13,14. Integration with                     Comprehensive methods reporting
Microscopy Environment (OME) model6             ImageJ/Fiji should make it broadly available                is essential for reporting imaging data,
and include an in-depth community-driven        to experimental scientists.                                 sharing images and emerging new
microscopy metadata model for light                MethodsJ2 automatically gathers                          methods16–22. Progress along the path
microscopy called 4DN-BINA-OME4. The            metadata from the image using OME                           of rigor and reproducibility is essential
model scales with experimental design,          BioFormats (for example, pixel size,                        for high quality microscope-based
instrument complexity and the degree to         magnification) and captures microscopy                      science and is a shared responsibility.
which image processing and quantitative         metadata from a Microscope.JSON file                        Experimental scientists must use due
image analysis are required for interpreting    generated using Micro-Meta App5,15.                         diligence to understand the fundamentals
results. This ensures that essential            Micro-Meta App is a companion software                      of the technologies and required
information is included while minimizing        tool that guides researchers step-by-step in                microscope metadata on which their
the burden on experimental scientists to        the collection of community-standardized                    research relies. Imaging scientists need
collect and report metadata7.                   microscopy metadata for a specific                          to educate experimental scientists, so
   Microscope metadata guidelines8–10,          microscope4. MethodsJ2 also guides the                      that they understand what metadata
examples of what can go wrong if metadata       user to enter specific experimental and                     need to be reported and why. Microscope
are not reported11 and descriptions of the      sample metadata (for example, cell type,                    manufacturers ought to integrate, automate
importance of measuring and reporting           dyes). Finally, the software guides the user                and report microscope metadata. Scientific
microscope quality control12 have been          through a step-by-step validation of the                    publishers and reviewers have a duty to
published. Increased awareness and              metadata. To improve tracking of imaging                    promote community-based guidelines4,6,23

Nature Methods | www.nature.com/naturemethods
correspondence | FOCUS
correspondence | FOCUS

and to ensure that published microscope           6.   Click ‘OK’. Draft methods text and any           Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 9UNC Neuroscience
images meet a minimum standard. Funding                custom facility acknowledgment state-            Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
agencies need to uphold high-quality                   ment are automatically generated and             NC, USA. 10Light Microscopy Core Facility, Duke
reproducible microscope images and ensure              appear in a popup window, are copied to          University, Durham, NC, USA. 11University Imaging
that detailed microscope metadata are                  the clipboard and can be pasted                  Centers, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,
available when images are publicly shared.             into a manuscript. A.csv file of the micro-      USA. 12Department of Neuroscience, University of
   MethodsJ2 and two companion software                scope metadata is generated and saved            Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
tools — Micro-Meta App15 and OMERO.                    (see the sample.csv file in the Supple-          ✉e-mail: claire.brown@mcgill.ca
mde23 — advance rigor and reproducibility              mentary Information and on the GitHub
in microscopy (Supplementary Fig. 1),                  portal). Note: it is the responsibility of the   Published: xx xx xxxx
but there are still challenges. Microscopy             experimental scientists to review the draft      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01290-5
metadata are often limited, not in standard            text and ensure that it is accurate.
formats, not accessible owing to the use                                                                References
                                                                                                        1. Marques, G., Pengo, T. & Sanders, M. A. eLife 9, e55133
of proprietary microscope manufacturer                                                                      (2020).
software and/or lost when images are              Reporting summary                                     2. Lee, J. Y. & Kitaoka, M. Mol. Biol. Cell 29, 1519–1525
saved and opened with third-party                 Further information on research design is                 (2018).

software4. Microscope manufacturers               available in the Nature Research Reporting            3. Dekker, J. et al. Nature 549, 219–226 (2017).
                                                                                                        4. Hammer, M. et al. Nat. Methods Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.
need to work with the global community            Summary linked to this article.                           org/10.1101/2021.04.25.441198 (2021).
through organizations such as Quality                                                                   5. Rigano, A. et al. 4DN-BINA-OME (NBO) Tiered Microscopy
                                                                                                            Metadata Specifications v2.01 https://github.com/WU-BIMAC
Assessment and Reproducibility for                Online content                                            (2021).
Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy          Any methods, additional references, Nature            6. Goldberg, I. G. et al. Genome Biol. 6, R47 (2005).
(QUAREP-LiMi)24,25 to automate the                Research reporting summaries, source data,
                                                                                                        7. Huisman, M. et al. Preprint at ArXiv https://arxiv.org/
                                                                                                            abs/1910.11370 (2021).
collection of metadata, ensure they               extended data, supplementary information,             8. Aaron, J. S. & Chew, T.-L. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs254151
conform to community standards4,6,23              acknowledgements, peer review                              (2021).
and make them readily available.                  information; details of author contributions          9. Linkert, M. et al. J. Cell Biol. 189, 777–782 (2010).
                                                                                                        10. Heddleston, J. M., Aaron, J. S., Khuon, S. & Chew, T. -L. J. Cell Sci.
The implementation and evolution                  and competing interests; and statements of                134, jcs254144 (2021).
of MethodsJ2, Micro-Meta App15 and                data and code availability are available at           11. Montero Llopis, P. et al. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/
OMERO.mde23, will promote transparency            https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01290-5.               s41592-021-01156-w (2021).
                                                                                                        12. Nelson, G., Gelman, L., Faklaris, O., Nitschke, R. & Laude, A.
and reproducibility and help stakeholders                                                                   Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.08713 (2020).
to ensure that microscopy metadata are                                                                  13. Ryan, J. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.
documented and reported.                          Data availability                                         org/10.1101/2021.06.23.449674 (2021).
                                                                                                        14. Ryan, J. et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5172827
   The following list describes the               Data in the form of a sample image and                    (2021).
MethodsJ2 workflow (summarized in Fig. 1);        Microscope.JSON file are available at https://        15. Rigano, A. et al. Nat. Methods Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.
a more detailed workflow and sample               github.com/ABIF-McGill/MethodsJ2.                         org/10.1101/2021.05.31.446382 (2021).
microscope metadata are available in the                                                                16. Ellenberg, J. et al. Nat. Methods 15, 849–854
                                                                                                            (2018).
Supplementary Information.                                                                              17. Miyakawa, T. Mol. Brain 13, 24 (2020).
                                                  Code availability                                     18. Sansone, S. A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 358–367
1.   Use Micro-Meta App to create and save        Full source code and step-by-step                         (2019).
                                                                                                        19. Botvinik-Nezer, R. et al. Nature 582, 84–88 (2020).
     a Microscope.JSON file. Give compo-          instructions are available at https://github.         20. Sheen, M. R. et al. Replication study: biomechanical remodeling
     nents detailed names, as this text popu-     com/ABIF-McGill/MethodsJ2 and https://                    of the microenvironment by stromal caveolin-1 favors tumor
     lates the methods text. For example, put     doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5172827.               ❐           invasion and metastasis. Elife 8, e4512 (2019).
                                                                                                        21. Gosselin, R. D. BioEssays 42, e1900189 (2020).
     ‘63×/1.4 NA Plan-Apochromatic oil                                                                  22. Gibney, E. Nature 577, 14 (2020).
     immersion’ rather than ‘63×’.                Joel Ryan 1,2, Thomas Pengo 3,                        23. Kunis, S., Hänsch, S., Schmidt, C., Wong, F. & Weidtkamp-Peters,
2.   Download the MethodsJ2 script (file          Alex Rigano4, Paula Montero Llopis          5
                                                                                                  ,         S. Nat. Methods Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02942
                                                                                                            (2021).
     named: MethodsJ2_v1_2_.py), an ex-           Michelle S. Itano 6,7,8,9,                            24. Boehm, U. et al. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-
     ample Microscope.JSON file and an ex-        Lisa A. Cameron 10,                                       021-01162-y (2021).
     ample image file from GitHub (https://       Guillermo Marqués 11,12,                              25. Nelson, G. et al. J. Microsc. 284, 56–73 (2021).
     github.com/ABIF-McGill/MethodsJ2).           Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia 4,
     Download and install ImageJ/Fiji             Mark A. Sanders 11,12 and                             Acknowledgements
     (https://fiji.sc/).                          Claire M. Brown 1,2 ✉                                 We thank our microscopy core facility staff and users of
3.   Drag the MethodsJ2 script file and drop      1
                                                   Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF), McGill          McGill University Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF)
     it onto the ImageJ/Fiji toolbar. The         University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2Department     (RRID: SCR_017697), University Imaging Centers of
                                                                                                        the University of Minnesota (RRID: SCR_020997),
     script editor will open, then press ‘Run’.   of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec,   MicRoN (Microscopy Resources on the North Quad)
4.   Select an image file. The image metadata     Canada. 3University of Minnesota Informatics          Core at Harvard Medical School, UNC Neuroscience
     are automatically extracted. Sample          Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,      Microscopy Core (RRID: SCR_019060) (supported,
     information can be added manually.           MN, USA. 4Program in Molecular Medicine,              in part, by NIH-NINDS Neuroscience Center Support
                                                                                                        Grant P30 NS045892 and NIH-NICHD Intellectual and
     Select a Microscope.JSON file for the        University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School,
                                                                                                        Developmental Disabilities Research Center Support
     corresponding microscope.                    Worcester, MA, USA. 5MicRoN, Department of            Grant P50 HD103573) and Duke University Light
5.   Follow the step-by-step guidance to          Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,     Microscopy Core Facility. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
     validate the metadata and input critical     USA. 6Neuroscience Microscopy Core, University of     DAF, an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community
     hardware and settings information.           North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 7Department     Foundation, supports C.M.B. (grant no. 2020-225398),
                                                                                                        C.S.-D.-C. (grant no. 2019-198155 (5022)) and M.S.I.
     Note: have an experienced microscope         of Cell Biology & Physiology, University of North
                                                                                                        (grant no. 2019-198107). We also acknowledge NIH
     user or imaging scientist help with          Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 8Carolina Institute   grants 2U01CA200059-06 and 1U01EB021238 to
     this step.                                   for Developmental Disabilities, University of North   C.S.-D.-C.

                                                                                                            Nature Methods | www.nature.com/naturemethods
FOCUS | correspondence
                                                                                                                  |             FOCUS correspondence

Author contributions                                      conceptualization, validation, writing review and           Additional information
J.R.: conceptualization, software development,            editing. G.M.: conceptualization, validation. C.S.-D.-C.:   Supplementary information The online version
validation, data curation, writing review and             conceptualization, software, validation, supervision,       contains supplementary material available at https://doi.
editing. T.P.: conceptualization, software development,   funding acquisition. M.A.S.: conceptualization,             org/10.1038/s41592-021-01290-5.
validation. A.R.: conceptualization, software              writing review and editing. C.M.B.: conceptualization,     Peer review information Nature Methods thanks Jon
development, validation. P.M.L.: conceptualization,       validation, writing original draft, writing review and      Mulholland, Brian Slaughter and the other, anonymous,
validation, writing review and editing.                   editing, supervision, project administration, funding       reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of
M.S.I.: conceptualization, validation. L.A.C.:            acquisition.                                                this work.

Nature Methods | www.nature.com/naturemethods
You can also read