Northeast Gas Association 2014 Sales and Marketing Conference Government Initiatives on Natural Gas Expansion - March 14, 2014
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Northeast Gas Association
2014 Sales and Marketing Conference
Government Initiatives
on Natural Gas Expansion
March 14, 2014State Agencies Involved throughout Gas Expansion Process
Market, Challenges, Policies and
Implementation
Potential Benefits Costs Programs
• Market studies • Customer • Financing • Planning
conversion costs
• Economic • Incentives • Reporting
benefits • Regulatory requirements
policies • Rate design
• Environmental
benefits • Investment
• Economic • Gas supply and
development pipeline capacity
2Example – Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources
Gas distribution
expansion study
Opportunities
Challenges & barriers
Strategies, policy
options,
rate/regulatory
models
Economic and
environmental
analysis
Collaborative
stakeholder process
31. Define Market Potential
By regions
Communities
By access
On-main
Off-main
New communities
By end user
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
http://www.rural.palegislature.us/documents/reports/Natural-Gas-Infrastructure-SR29.pdf
41. Identify Customer Interest
DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting
51. Quantify Potential Benefits
Fuel savings
Pennsylvania
• Fuel savings of approximately $1,500/year for converting customers;
• $15.2 million/year of additional GDP; and
• $7.1 million/year of disposable personal income injected into the state economy.
Environmental benefits
Reduce carbon emissions
Economic development
Pennsylvania
• 3,100 additional job-years from 2014 through 2040.
Energy efficiency
62. Identify Challenges to Achieve Benefits
Customer challenges
Upfront cost
• New heating system
• Contributions (CIAC)
Conversion process
• Can be cumbersome
LDC challenges
Policies that prohibit cross-subsidies
Gas supply and capacity constraints
Other challenges
Permits
72. Upfront Cost is a Challenge for Off-Main Projects
DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting
83. Develop Policies and Programs – Setting a Framework
High
Upfront
Cost
Low High
Access to Natural Gas
93. Develop Policies and Programs – Estimating Impacts
DOER study, 2nd stakeholder meeting
103. Policies and Programs: Financing
Lower upfront cost through financing
No- or low-interest financing options
Financing of equipment costs and/or the CIAC
Repayment through the utility (on-bill repayment), or a third-party bank (loans)
Market
Primarily On-Main
Example
Southwest Gas offers a Residential Amortization Program, which allows customers to
pay their CIAC interest-free through an on-bill surcharge. This type of financing is
similar to zone rates.
Many utilities partner with third-party banks to provide low-interest loans for
equipment purchases, such as the HEAT Loan Program in Massachusetts, which
focuses on high energy efficiency boilers and heaters.
113. Policies and Programs (cont.): Financial Incentives
Lower upfront cost through incentives
Rebates, grants, and tax credits
Funding sources from utilities and government agencies
Market
Primarily On-Main
Example
Puget Sound Energy offers up to $3,550 in incentives for customers switching from
the utility’s electric service to the natural gas heating service, along with additional
rebates (up to $800) for installing higher energy efficient equipment.
The conversion incentive amount can be applied to the equipment and installation,
but is limited to 75% of the total cost.
123. Policies and Programs (cont.): Free Service Lines
Lower upfront cost through free service lines
Market
Primarily On-Main
Promotes the connection of Low-Use customers, which increases the likelihood of
that customer’s future conversion to natural gas.
Example
Many; according to AGA study, at least 49 utilities
133. Policies and Programs (cont.): Low-Cost Bonds and Grants
Lower cost of expansion through financial support
in areas where capital is limited or unwilling to invest
Market
Off-Main
Example - North Carolina
LDCs in North Carolina have used $200 million in natural gas bond funds (in addition
to $115 million in expansion funds paid for by all gas customer in the state) to expand
access to the natural gas system in rural parts of the state.
These funds were used to expand service to 31 counties, increasing the total number
of counties in the state with access to 96 (out of 100).
Other States where Implemented or Proposed
ME, NC, PA
143. Policies and Programs (cont.): Zone Rates
Lower upfront cost by spreading expansion costs over a pool of new
customers, and recovering costs over a longer period of time through a rate
surcharge on new customers
Market
Primarily Off-Main
Illustrative Example
Florida Public Utilities Company (“FPUC”) has increased its customer base by nearly
20% since implementing zone rates in 1995.
FPUC’s Area Expansion Program allows new customers that are part of an expansion
project to pay a $5.00 per dekatherm surcharge for 10 years.
Other States where Implemented or Proposed
CT, DE, FL, MN, NY, PA, UT
153. Policies and Programs (cont.): Blended Rate
Lower upfront cost by spreading expansion costs over all customers, and
recovering costs over a longer period of time through a rate surcharge on all
customers
Recognizes the importance of having access to natural gas
Market
Primarily Off-Main
Example
AGL Resources’ Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement (STRIDE)
program in Georgia allows the utility to invest $400 million over ten years in
infrastructure improvements, including expansion to meet forecasted growth.
This program was merged with the company’s existing Pipeline Replacement
Program (which was initiated in 1998) to ease implementation.
Other States where Implemented or Proposed
CT, GA, MN, MS, NC, NE, TX, VT
163. Policies and Programs (cont.): Illustrative Summary
174. Monitor and Track Implementation
Market
Potential
Planning
&
Reporting
Policies and Results
Programs
18Thank You!
Tim Lyons
Partner
Sussex Economic Advisors
802-497-0761
802-598-1651
tlyons@Sussex-advisors.com
19About Sussex
Sussex Economic Advisors, LLC is a management and economic
advisory firm providing consulting services to regulated industries such
as natural gas, electricity, water, and thermal energy distribution.
The firm’s Partners have held senior positions in utility companies, competitive
energy suppliers, management consulting firms, and business-focused
academic institutions.
Our Consulting Staff, Executive Advisors, and Affiliated Experts have
substantial experience and training in matters relating to regulatory strategy
and policy development, gas supply planning and capacity portfolio optimizing,
energy market analysis and assessments, financial and economic analysis,
rate proceedings and regulatory compliance, due diligence and valuation, and
management reviews and audits.
Sussex has a long list of clients including natural gas distribution companies,
electric utilities, combination utilities, electric transmission providers, natural
gas pipeline companies, state agencies, and non-regulated energy market
participants.
20You can also read