SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates

Page created by Gabriel Burns
 
CONTINUE READING
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
SITETRENDS

WA R F O R TA L E N T
WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE
           JULY 2017
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
CONTENTS   3    introduction

           4    war for talent

           5    defining generations

           6    united states domestic perspectives

           10   united states perspectives in leading markets

           16   global perspectives

           17   global populations

           21   global workforce

       22       global employment

       24       global unemployment

       25       about h& a
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
INTRODUCTION

The “War for Talent” is a phrase commonly used to describe competition among businesses for quality and
affordable labor. First used in the 1990s, the phrase became relevant as the United States shifted its economic
focus from the Baby Boomer generation to Generation X, and as business leaders increasingly became aware
of the link between talent attraction and competitiveness. Although this initial shift was characterized by the
demographic change which accompanied the transition away from the larger Boomer population (who had long
defined the consumer economy), the challenge associated with attracting the qualified and affordable labor
necessary to sustain the consumer economy persists, even as the smaller Generation X now begins to give way
to an even larger generation – the Millennials.

Twenty years have passed since the phrase War for Talent was coined, and with the passage of time, perspective
has provided additional insight. The workforce has changed; people aren’t retiring with the same firm where
they began their careers—a trend that has certainly accelerated over the past decade.

                                           BUSINESS CHANGED
Brick and mortar retail is in decline while online purchasing is giving rise to warehouse development. Fresh
outlooks are needed to transition to a new normal. Certain international trends also parallel and influence the
quest for talent. Offshoring and outsourcing play a significant role in local employment trends, requiring workers
to have strong talent to differentiate themselves from others.

The world is becoming a much closer-knit environment of cause and effect, especially as supply chains for
goods are optimized and service economies are expanding to new markets where digital products are not
limited by transportation costs.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                        3
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
WAR FOR TALENT

The War for Talent is driven by population shifts. In        retire in millions every year. Over time, technological
the United States, a predictable population cycle has        innovations allowed the cycle of larger followed by
emerged over the past century. This cycle tends to           smaller populations to accommodate sustainable
run in 20-30 year periods in which larger population         replacement of this workforce.
cohorts are followed by smaller generations.
                                                             However, as the Boomers now move into retirement,
At the dawn of the 20 century the population of the
                               th
                                                             members of Generation X are positioned to move into
United States grew rapidly, first fueled by immigration      the middle and upper stages of their careers at just
and then as a result of people delaying the start of their   the right time to capitalize on natural winnowing of
families due primarily to the Great Depression and           professional experience. This means that leadership
the Second World War. People born between 1905               positions filled over the next ten years can uniquely
and 1925 grew up during a period of unprecedented            accommodate Generation X.
immigration. They came of age at a time when jobs
were initially very difficult to find and later when the     In parallel with this transition is the entry of the Millennial
consumer economy was secondarily stunted by war.             population into the workforce. Millennials, generally
                                                             in their early 20s to mid-30s, now represent a larger
The post-war setting allowed Americans to finally            population than the Boomers preceding them. While
start a family and settle down into long term career         there is clear evidence that this second population
employment. At this time, the population of the United       boom will mirror demands that Boomers put on the
States grew quickly and thus created the Baby Boom           consumer economy (more people will eventually need
generation, a group which subsequently created a             more products), some things have changed. The
new consumer economy for all sorts of items: apparel         service sector replaced manufacturing during the
(the birth of style), recorded music (the Beatles), cars,    coming of age of Boomers and the rise of Millennials.
suburban housing, and products were all needed               Information, in addition to products, is driving the
or demanded by a generation larger than any in the           market. Products are now manufactured in other
history of the United States.                                countries, necessitating global supply chains driven
                                                             by data-heavy logistics, further perpetuating data
Yet, this growth didn’t continue forever. The smaller        analytics services. Today’s global population wants
Generation X that followed the Boomers may have              goods manufactured in China to be as accessible to
caused the consumer economy to slow without                  them as they were when the consumer could have
productivity innovations, such as computer technology        bought the good locally.
and the internet, which allowed fewer people to do
more with fewer resources. For a while, the sheer
number of Boomers in the workforce offset the drop
in numbers of the next generation. Today, Boomers

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                  4
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
DEFINING GENERATIONS

                                                   FIG. 1: DESCRIPTIONS OF GENERATIONS

                                                         1905-1925
                                    1945-1965               GREATEST/GI
                                                                               1925-1945
                                    (BABY) BOOMERS                                SILENT GEN

                                  1985-2005                                       1965-1985
                                      MILLENNIALS
                                                         2005-2025                       GEN X
                                                                 GEN Z

Future population projections indicate a second                      of three generations in their workforce to be a
population contraction: Generation Z. Generation Z                   sustainable model. This allows for seasoned leadership,
ranges from children born today up to high school                    mentoring, and on-boarding to happen in predictable
students. Trends in employment similarities between                  cycles with the potential for career tracks to naturally
Boomers and Millennials can also be linked to                        develop, thus promoting an environment suitable to a
Generation X and Generation Z. Thus, five predictable                meritocracy and predictable turnover.
population cycles can be shown over the past 100
years in the United States, and while challenges exist in            This analysis will compare the populations in key world
finding appropriate talent in today’s workforce, these               markets before examining specific job trends in the
challenges have distinct benefits for the United States              United States. To demonstrate the broad impact of
economy.                                                             the War for Talent, we examine key regional global
                                                                     economies. For this paper, China and India will
Figure 1 outlines the generational trends in the United              represent Asia, Mexico and Brazil will represent Latin
States. Many businesses employ multi-generational                    America, and Germany and the United Kingdom will
workforces and find deploying significant proportions                represent Europe.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                   5
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
UNITED STATES PERSPECTIVES
DOMESTIC

This report examines certain key occupations and their
relationship to all other jobs in the United States. Past
employment trends have been forecasted to 2021 to
model expected wage inflation and job growth and
contrast this future five-year period with prior growth.
Occupations were selected in order to represent key parts
of the economy. These occupations include:

      •    All United States Jobs                  •   Financial Clerks
                                                       (Financial Sector)
      •    Business Jobs
                                                   •   Customer Service Jobs
      •    Software Developers                         (Services Sector)
           (Information Technology
           Sector)                                 •   Team Assemblers
                                                       (Manufacturing and Production
      •    Retail Workers                              Sector)
           (Retail Sector)
                                                   •   Material Movers
      •    Administrative Jobs                         (Transportation and
           (Services and Support Sector)               Warehousing Sector)

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                 6
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
UNITED STATES PERSPECTIVES
DOMESTIC
Wage inflation for targeted jobs shows growth in all sectors except team assemblers
(production), which is flat, and retail sales, in which there is a decline corresponding
to incremental gains for material movers (Figure 2). Wage inflation in IT will continue
to outpace many other jobs as the demand for software developers continues to
increase at record pace, both in the United States and abroad.

                                                        FIG. 2: RATE OF WAGE INFLATION

                                                                  13%
                                      7%

                                 7%

                                                            11%
                 Δ 2012-2016         ALL
                 Δ 2016-2021        JOBS
                                                                                                           10%

                                                                                                      9%
                                                                                   9%          9%
                                                                                          9%                     9% 9%
                               8%                                             8%

      7%
           7%             6%
                                                   6%
                                            5.4%

    RETAIL             BUSINESS            CUSTOMER       SOFTWARE           ADMIN       MATERIAL   FINANCIAL    TEAM
   WORKERS               JOBS               SERVICE      DEVELOPERS           JOBS       MOVERS       CLERKS  ASSEMBLERS

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                   7
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
DOMESTIC PERSPECTIVES CONTINUED

Wage growth for software developers is partially caused by the lack of available
labor, which will not be able to keep pace with demand (Figure 3). High growth
customer service and material mover jobs are evidence of a growing service sector
and a consumer economy driven by online purchasing.

                                                            FIG. 3: JOB GROWTH

                                                            35%

                                     9%                           33%
                                8%

                 Δ 2012-2016     ALL
                                JOBS                                                        22%
                 Δ 2016-2021
                                                                                      21%
                                                    19%
                                              18%

                               14%
                         13%                                                                                        14%

                                                                                                              11%
           7%
                                                                                 4
                                                                                 %
                                                                            3%
     4%

    RETAIL              BUSINESS           CUSTOMER        SOFTWARE         ADMIN    MATERIAL     FINANCIAL    TEAM
   WORKERS                JOBS              SERVICE       DEVELOPERS         JOBS    MOVERS         CLERKS  ASSEMBLERS

                                                                                                    -2% -3%

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                    8
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
DOMESTIC PERSPECTIVES CONTINUED

Nationally, business jobs, software developers, customer service, and material mover jobs are all increasing the
number of available jobs in relation to all other jobs over the next five years (Figure 4). Team assembler jobs are
expected to double their proportional representation in the market, meaning some metropolitan areas may
become increasingly manufacturing based.

Conversely, retail jobs are expected to continue to decrease in numbers as buyers continue to flock to the
virtual marketplace. Administrative jobs and financial clerks may be experiencing a reduction due to changes in
computer utility, shifting these jobs to other specialists and using software to aid in tasking.
                                     FIG. 4: GROWTH IN THE PROPORTION OF TARGETED JOBS COMPARED TO ALL JOBS

                                                                26% 26
                                                                      %

            Δ 2012-2016
            Δ 2016-2021
                                                                                                  13%

                                                                                             12
                                                                                              %
                                                        11%
                                                   9%

                           5%   6%
                                                                                                                                6%

                                                                                                                           3%

    RETAIL                BUSINESS          CUSTOMER           SOFTWARE       ADMIN        MATERIAL      FINANCIAL    TEAM
   WORKERS                  JOBS             SERVICE          DEVELOPERS       JOBS        MOVERS          CLERKS  ASSEMBLERS

             -2%
      -3%

                                                                               -4%
                                                                                     -6%

                                                                                                              -9%

                                                                                                                    -13%
SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                               9
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS WAR FOR TALENT - WHERE THE WORKFORCE & JOBS LIVE - Hickey & Associates
UNITED STATES PERSPECTIVES
IN LEADING AND GROWING
LOCAL MARKETS

At the end of the day, the War for Talent will take place at
the local level. Local employment trends in leading and
emerging markets across the United States were captured
and summarized to understand cost and availability over
the next five years in those key cities. The intersection
of high job growth and low wage inflation within a local
market is valuable information, as is the opposite. This
analysis helps to describe short and mid-term changes in
leading and emerging job markets in the United States.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                         10
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
FIG. 5: [SOFTWARE ENGINEERS/DEVELOPERS] ANNUAL JOB & WAGE GROWTH, 2016-2021
                                            4%
                                       4%                                                                                                                          10%
                                                                                                                          9%                                                10%
                           10%
                                                                                                                                                                                      TRENTON
                                                 SEATTLE
                                 11%                                                                                                                    NEW YORK
                                                                                                                                                          CITY                            1%
                                                                                                                                                                                                1%
                                                                                                                                                                  1%
                                                                                                                               2%             12   %                                            BOSTON
                                                                           3% 3 4
                                                                               % %
                      1%                                                                                             1%                 2%                         3%                          1% -1%
                                                                                        3%                                                                                                3%
                                                                                                                                                                                                     D.C.
            SAN                                                                                               MADISON
         FRANCISCO                                                                                                                       7%                        4%
                                                                                                                          CHICAGO                        4%
                           4%                                                                                                                                                    -2   %
                                       4%                              BOULDER DENVER                                                                         0%
                       SAN                                                                                                                    3%
                       JOSE                 0%                                                           5
                                                                                                         %                          2
                                                                                                                                    %
                                                                                                                                                                            1 BALTIMORE
                                                                                                                                                                            %

                                                                                                    3%                                                  CHAPEL RALEIGH
                                         LOS                                                                                                             HILL
                                       ANGELES
                                                                                                                                        ATLANTA
                                                                                                                               HUNTSVILLE
                                                                                                    DALLAS

                                                                                                              Job Growth           Wage Growth

Software engineer/developer jobs (one of the most sought-after industries) are expected to grow by 10% through
2021 in traditional West Coast markets and Greater New York (Figure 5). Atlanta, which is a large market, is
expected to continue growing with more modest wage inflation than expected in top tier markets. Madison
is expected to grow rapidly, while wages remain flat—likely as a result of growth in small and mid-sized firms.
The market forces driving Madison’s rapid growth may lead to challenges for companies that don’t already
have expansion plans underway there currently. Economic Developers will need to develop policies to continue
growing, and ensure that wages remain competitive and the market remains unsaturated.

The proportion of jobs compared to the entire job market in these local areas gives some perspective on
specialization (Figure 6). Markets supporting over 30 software development jobs per 1000 total local market jobs
may be considered specialized. San Jose, San Francisco, and Seattle can thus be considered specialized markets.
New York City, however, has fewer of these jobs in proportion to all other jobs due to its diverse economy. The
larger volume of total jobs in New York accounts for the ability to add new software engineer jobs at the same
pace as Silicon Valley. Specialization is also occurring in Trenton and Madison, following overall job growth trends.

                                                       FIG. 6: NUMBER OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS PER 1000 TOTAL IN MARKET JOBS
                                 61

  2016      2021

                           40                                39

                 32                                                                                                                 32
            24                                                                                                          28                         29
                                                        25                                                         26
                                                                                                                               20             20
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  17
                                                                      14                                                                                 14 16         13
                                                                             12                                                                                                                              13
      12                                    11                                                                                                                              12                       11 12
  9                                              9                9                 9 10
                                                                                                6                                                                                         5 6
                                                                                                             4 3

  NEW      SEATTLE          SAN             D.C.         SAN    ATLANTA    BOSTON   DALLAS   CHICAGO       LOS     BOULDER TRENTON MADISON              RALEIGH    CHAPEL         BALTIMORE DENVER HUNTSVILLE
  YORK                      JOSE                      FRANCISCO                                          ANGELES                                                    HILL

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                                                                        11
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
FIG. 7: [WAREHOUSE LABOR] ANNUAL JOB & WAGE GROWTH, 2016-2021

                                                                                                                                                                                  11%

                                                                                                                            1%                                   NEW YORK
                                                                                                                                                                   CITY
                                                                                                                      4%         1%       2%

                              10%                                                                                                 3%
                                                                                                                                       3%
                                                                                                                                                                        0%              -2%
                                                                                                             ROCKFORD                         INDIANAPOLIS
                         4%                                                                                        CHICAGO                                        LEBANON
                                                                   4%                                                                         3%
                    2%
                                         2%                                                                                      2%                         10
                                                                                                                                                             %

                                                                                                                                                  2%
                  LOS                                         1%
                ANGELES RIVERSIDE                                                                 3%
                                                                                                                             MEMPHIS                        -1%
                                                              PHOENIX                                  -1%                      DALTON                            -3%
                                                                                                                                                   ATLANTA              SAVANNAH
                                                                                        DALLAS                                            0   %
                                                                                                         3%
                                                                                                        HOUSTON
                                                                                                              -4%

                                                                                                                  Job Growth              Wage Growth

Warehouse laborers and material mover jobs are growing rapidly to support online purchases (Figure 7). These
jobs are primarily located at the fringes of urban areas, but have recently been pushed into the urban core in an
effort to achieve same day shipping. Wages for these positions are expected to remain somewhat flat despite
this growth.

                                               FIG. 8: NUMBER OF WAREHOUSE WORKERS PER 1000 TOTAL IN MARKET JOBS
                                                                                                             84

                   2016       2021                                                                     67
                                                                             60

                                                              40        41                                                                        39         38                   37
                                                                                                                    34 35                                                    35         32
                                                   30
                                    26        23         27                                                                                            26
                        23     23
                   16                                                             19                                              17 20
                                                                                       13    15
                                                                                                  8

                    NEW         LOS       CHICAGO       ATLANTA     RIVERSIDE     DALLAS    HOUSTON MEMPHIS          PHOENIX SAVANNAH DALTON                             LEBANON ROCKFORD
                    YORK      ANGELES                                                                    INDIANAPOLOIS

Already warehousing heavy, California’s Inland Empire (Figure 8, Riverside) is expected to become hyper-
specialized in the transportation sector, and by 2021 nearly one in ten jobs in Memphis will be in a warehouse.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                                                        12
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
FIG. 9: [CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES] ANNUAL JOB & WAGE GROWTH, 2016-2021

                                                                                                              5%                        11%
                                          3%              8%                                                                                                                      5%
                                                                                                     2%
                                                     3%
                                                2%                                                                                                                    NEW YORK
                                  1%                                                                                                                                    CITY %
                                                                                                                               3%                                            1
                                                                                                    MINNEAPOLIS
                                       BOISE                                                                              0%
                                         SALT
                                       LAKE CITY                                                                          CHICAGO
                                               8%               PROVO
                                                               0%                              6
                                                                                               %

                       1%    0%                                                                                                                       2%
                                               1%                                                        5%                JOHNSON
                                                                                                                                                                 5%
                         LOS                                                             2%
                                                                                                                                 -4%
                       ANGELES                                                                                                                0   %

                                               PHOENIX
                                                                                                    3%
                                                                                                                                                                            3%
                                                                                                                                              ATLANTA

                                                                                         DALLAS                                                            1%
                                                                                                                                                                       1%
                                                                                                    HOUSTON
                                                                                                                                                           TAMPA
                                                                                                                                                                       FT. LAUDERDALE
                                                                                                                   Job Growth          Wage Growth

Customer service jobs have been re-shoring, a trend that may continue to drive growth in less traditional US
markets such as Johnson, TN (Figures 9-10) where the volume of new jobs are helping to drive costs down.
Phoenix and Provo, UT will also remain as job creators, but maintain low wage growth.

                                           FIG. 10: NUMBER OF CUSTOMER SERVICE JOBS PER 1000 TOTAL IN MARKET JOBS

                 2016        2021                                                                                                                                     37

                                                                                                                                       54
                                               49
                                                                                                              48

                                                                                                                                 41                   26
                                                                                                         39                                   39                                  26
                                                                                                                                                                 35          39
                                          36                                                                                                                                                  26
                                                                                                                                                                                         39
                                                                         32

                                                      27 26         27
                                                                                                                          25
                                  23                                                           22                    23
                            21
                                                                                          19
                  16
                                                                               13
                                                                                    12

                 NEW        CHICAGO      PHOENIX      ATLANTA       DALLAS      LOS      HOUSTON      TAMPA                      PROVO        SALT              JOHNSON      BOISE         FT.
                 YORK                                                         ANGELES                              MINNEAPOLIS                LAKE                                     LAUDERDALE

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                                                              13
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
FIG.11: [PRODUCTION ASSEMBLY] ANNUAL JOB & WAGE GROWTH, 2016-2021
                                                                                                                                          11%

                                                                                                                     1% -15%                     BATTLE CREEK
                                                                                                                                     3%
                                                                                                                CHICAGO
                                                                                                     4%                                             1%
                                                                                MINNEAPOLIS                                                -1%           3%
                                                                                             0%                                  WARREN
                                                                                                            ROCKFORD
                                                                                                                                                 -1%
                                                                                     13%                                                                           3%
                                                                                                                -1% 1%                                                    5%
                                                                                                       10 %                                     DETROIT
                                                                                         8 %                                                                              ELIZABETHTOWN
                                                                                                                                           4%             8%            GREENVILLE
                                                                                                                     11%                  2%
                                                                               ELKHART
                                                                                                                                      LOUISVILLE                         6%
                               0%                                                                  1%                       11%
                         1%
                                                                                                                                               5%
                           LOS                                                             COLUMBUS                                                                      SPARTANBURG
                         ANGELES                                                                                                                              1%        -4%
                                                                                                  4%           -3%                        -2%
                                                                                 LAFAYETTE                                                      ATLANTA
                                                                                                                                0%
                                                                                         -4%              NASHVILLE                       TUSCALOOSA

                                                                                                            Job Growth          Wage Growth

Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan may grow production jobs by 2021—with increased competition in Elkhart and
northern Indiana, both are attractive enough to also see wages climb higher than other leading and emerging
markets (Figure 11). Production jobs in Chicago will continue their steady decline as they are overshadowed by
other sectors of the economy (Figure 12).

                                     FIG. 12: NUMBER OF PRODUCTION ASSEMBLY JOBS PER 1000 TOTAL IN MARKET JOBS

                                                                                  220
            2016    2021

                                                                               132
                                                                                               118
                                                                                                              100
                                                                                                                                                         89
                                                                                           76                              71
                                                                                                          67         60                   66                             66
                                                                                                                                     57             57              57
                                                             35     43 49                                                                                                              43
                                              30 33     23                                                                                                                     25 29
                19 18
       10 11                  6 1     5                                                                                                                                                     8 9

      ATLANTA   WARREN    CHICAGO     LOS     DETROIT NASHVILLE                ELKHART COLUMBUS BATTLE LAFAYETTE        TUSCALOOSA        LOUISVILLE        MINNEAPOLIS
                                    ANGELES                       GREENVILLE                    CREEK          SPARTANBURG     ELIZABETHTOWN         ROCKFORD

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                                                            14
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
CONCLUSION
The War for Talent is taking place at the local level,    operations remain at full capacity. During the global
but significant opportunity remains for companies         economic crisis of 2008-2010, warehouse employment
seeking to diversify their workforces by partitioning     benefited from supplies of production labor as
specializations into smaller functional groups and        manufacturing slowed. Over the next five years,
co-locating those groups in growing and emerging          manufacturing is expected to continue a recovery
markets. These smaller functional groups have the         cycle and with the growth of online retail, many
ability to grow organically in smaller markets without    traditional warehouse markets may be stressed for
overly stressing saturation levels. Diversification can   labor. Convincing former retail workers to move from
also leverage job training funds and development          client facing stores to warehouses may be possible for
incentives to help offset costs.                          only a portion of retail workers.

Certain jobs, such as software engineers, may be filled   The hunt for top talent may ease if unemployment
by opening offices in university towns like Madison,      rises, but at the moment, the United States and
Wisconsin, where those positions are expected to          global unemployment rates are at historic lows.
grow. These jobs are uniquely adept at adopting           Harnessing the power of this talent is crucial to
remote work environments and work-from-home               firm competitiveness and expansion. The world is
policies, so they might be closely linked to offices in   becoming more interrelated with companies seeking
more traditional markets through use of technology.       to distribute goods and services into new markets
Technology may also facilitate growth in customer         every day. Overall, moves to leverage international
service positions for similar reasons.                    and local opportunities have been successful and have
                                                          had a significant impact on business growth both in
Transportation and production jobs, however, will         the United States and abroad.
continue to be facility-based. However, these sectors
expect slower job growth over the next five years
in most markets. Retention of the most productive
employees will be critical in ensuring these manual

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                      15
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL POPULATIONS
                                                                              CHINA 2017
                                                                                100+
                                                                                95-99
Figure 13 shows the population of the United States as                          90-94
                                                                                85-89
represented by a population pyramid. Noted on the pyramid                       80-84
                                                                                75-79
are the associated generations described in Figure 1. The                       70-74
cyclical trend population growth and decline is evident in                      65-69
                                                                                60-64
                                                                                               BOOMERS

this 100-year population pyramid.                                               55-59
                                                                                50-54
                                                                                45-49
Alternatively, China’s generational sizes appear heavily                        40-44
                                                                                35-39
exaggerated, a result of the One-Child policy in which the                      30-34        MILLENNIALS
                                                                                25-29
government regulated the number of children born to each                        20-24
family. The aging of China’s population is evident and it                       15-19
                                                                                10-14
remains to be seen what effect this policy will have on the                      5-9
future workforce of China.                                                       0-4
                                                                         6%    0%    0%        6%

India’s population tends to be younger, but it is clear that its              GERMANY 2017
growth reversed sometime around 2000. India’s population                         95-99
                                                                                 90-94
pyramid mirrors the United States of 60 years ago.                               85-89
                                                                                 80-84
                                                                                 75-79
                                                                                 70-74
           FIG. 13: POPULATION PYRAMID - UNITED STATES 2017                      65-69        BOOMERS
                                                                                 60-64
                                         95-99                                   55-59
                                                                                 50-54
                                         90-94                                   45-49
                                                                                 40-44
                                         85-89                                   35-39
                                                                                 30-34       MILLENNIALS
                                         80-84                                   25-29
             SILENT GEN                                                          20-24
                                         75-79                                   15-19
                                                                                 10-14
                                         70-74
                                                                                  5-9
                                         65-69             BOOMERS                0-4

                                         60-64                           6%    0%       0%      6%

                                         55-59                                INDIA 2017
                                         45-49                                  90-94
                                                                                85-89
                                         50-54                                  80-84
           GEN X                                                                75-79
                                         40-44
                                                                                70-74
                                         35-39                                  65-69          BOOMERS
                                                                                60-64
                                         30-34             MILLENNIALS          55-59
                                                                                50-54
                                         25-29
                                F E MA L E

                                                                                45-49
                                                                                40-44
                                         20-24                                  35-39
                                                                                30-34        MILLENNIALS
                                         15-19
                                                   MAL E

                                                                                25-29
                                         10-14                                  20-24
                                                                                15-19
           GEN Z                             5-9                                10-14
                                                                                 5-9
                                             0-4                                 0-4

                6%                    0%           0%      6%            6%    0%    0%        6%

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                     16
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
POPULATION PROJECTIONS

                                                         FIG. 6: ESTIMATED POPULATION PROJECTIONS

                                                  2017

                                                                                                            324,118,787*
                                                                                                                        *US Population, 2017

    1950         1970         1990         2010             2030       2050      2070       2090    2100

                                            GERMANY                    CHINA       INDIA
                     UNITED STATES
                                            UNITED KINGDOM             BRAZIL      MEXICO

What will happen to these Asian economies remains                               Germany has seen its population plateau over the
to be seen. Will populations stabilize and become                               past 50 years due to falling birth rates, a development
cyclical like the United States, or will populations                            German policy makers have attempted to slow through
decline dramatically over the next 100 years, putting                           increased immigration. Similar to China, Germany has
the spotlight back on the United States’ labour?                                experienced broad generational population swings.
Population projections (Figure 6) suggest the United                            Comparatively, the United Kingdom more closely
States’ population will continue to grow while other                            resembles the United States (in terms of population
economies shrink, even though their total numbers of                            trends) due to higher birth rates, liberal immigration
people overshadow the United States.                                            policies, cyclical generation trends and population
                                                                                growth projected for the next century.
The population pyramid for Germany still shows
the effects of WWII as women over 80 significantly
outnumber men, due to the many casualties of war.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                         17
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL POPULATIONS
BIRTHRATES
                                                                FIG 14: DECLINING BIRTH RATES

                            7

                            6

                            5

                            4

                            3

                            2

                            1

                            0
                                  1960         1970           1980      1990         2000       2010    2015    2020

                                                                       GERMANY              CHINA      INDIA
                                              UNITED STATES
                                                                      UNITED KINGDOM        BRAZIL     MEXICO

Latin American countries also project slower growth                              woman. The disparity between birth rates in the
over the next 100 years. Figure 14 shows birth rates                             world’s leading economies and those of developing
in these key economies from 1960 projected to 2020.                              countries in 1960 overwhelmingly shrank over the
There is no disputing that growth has slowed in every                            next 50 years. Predictably strong declines in India,
case. From a high of nearly seven births per woman                               Brazil, and Mexico foreshadow future limitations on
in Mexico in 1960, nearly every country will be at or                            the workforces of those countries beginning in 15 to
below the replacement value of 2 (children) in 2020.                             20 years.

When reviewing birth rates in the United States,                                 Declining birth rates may tighten labor markets in
effects of the Baby Boom generation tapering off can                             countries we see today as expanding markets, placing
be seen as birth rates fell from 3.5 in 1960 to under two                        extra strain on developing countries that will need
in 1980. Since 1980, birth rates in the United States                            to continue growing their economies with smaller
have weaved a trend around 2 from 1980 to 2015,                                  workforces. As current workers age, these economies
demarking the smaller Generation Z more recently.                                must invest in education, expand their service
The United States’ trend since 1970 is mirrored by                               sectors, and utilization of technology, and transition
similar birth rates in the United Kingdom, hovering                              agricultural workers to manufacturing.
around the replacement value of two children per

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                             18
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL POPULATIONS
MIGRATION’S EFFECT ON LABOR
                                                                                             FIG. 16: NET MIGRATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF LABOR FORCE
                                                                     10.0%
Migration (Figure 16) to the United States
has been a consistent workforce supply,                              8.0%
outpacing other targeted countries and
representing 4% of the United States’                                6.0%

workforce annually on average for the past
30 years. Countries, such as Germany, have                           4.0%

attempted to foster welcoming immigration
                                                                     2.0%
policies, but changing policy landscapes
may limit future growth both in the United                           0.0%
States and other countries.                                                           1987      1992      1997      2002       2007         2012     2016      2018        2020

                                                                     -2.0%

Numbers and proportions of working age
                                                                     -4.0%
populations are shown in Figure 17. India
and Mexico’s younger demographic is clear,                           -6.0%
as is the older population in Germany. The
sheer volume of China (806 million) and                              -8.0%
                                                                                                                         GERMANY
India’s (514 million) workforce is also evident.                                         UNITED STATES
                                                                                                                                                     CHINA               INDIA
                                                                                                                         UNITED KINGDOM              BRAZIL              MEXICO

                                                         FIG. 17: PROPORTION OF THE WORKFORCE BY AGE

                            5.62%                                             7.84%                        6.47%
                                                     9.55%
    14.79%                                                                                                                                                      17.76%
                                                                                                                                21.26%

             159M                   514M                     806M                      110M                        54M                         45M                        33M

 66.26%
                        65.60
                            %
                                               73.22 %
                                                                       69.13   %
                                                                                                       65.93%                      65.87%                     64.47%

    18.95%                28.79%                   17.23%                    23.03%                      27.61%                       12.87%                    17.77%

          UNITED                INDIA                     CHINA                    BRAZIL                       MEXICO                  GERMANY                    UNITED
          STATES                                                                                                                                                  KINGDOM
                                                                       0-14           15-65     65+

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                                           19
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL WORKFORCE

                                     FIG. 18: PROPORTION OF LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION BY ECONOMIC SECTOR, 2015
              79.1%
                                                                                                                               61.9%

                                                                                       49%
                                              33.6% 36.1%
                                                  30.3%                                           31%                     24.1%
       20.3%
                                                                                             20
                                                                                              %                        13.4%

                                  61.9%
    0.6%
                                                                                                               73.8%
                                                                              83.5%
                                                                                                                        MEXICO
    UNITED                                         CHINA                                INDIA
    STATES
                          15.7%
                             13.3%                                                                         24.6%

                                                                                                        1.6%
                                                                          15.2%
                            BRAZIL
                                                                     1.3%
                                                                                                        GERMANY

                                                                     UNITED
                                                                    KINGDOM

                                                            Agriculture     Industry   Services

In terms of the distribution of each targeted country’s workforce, Figure 18
demonstrates the similarities between the economies of the United States and
United Kingdom. Both have very small agricultural employment sectors, due in
large part to long histories of mechanization and crop prioritization. India and China,
with reliance on labor-intensive rice harvests, have not made the investment into
agriculture necessary to free up large segments of the population for other sectors.
As education in India and China reaches rural areas, migration trends to urban areas
may fuel growth in services and manufacturing. Alternatively, diversification of the
economies of second tier Asian cities may also occur.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                 20
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT SECTOR
AND THE ECONOMY
                                                FIG. 19: PROPORTION OF GDP BY ECONOMIC SECTOR, 2015
                 79.5%
                                                                                                                                                              72%

                                                                  45.4%                                         50.7%
                                                                                                        40.7%

                                                          29.8%                                                                        80.2%

                                                                                         69.1%                                                        21.8%
         19.4%                                    16.4%
                                        63.2%
                                                                                                 8.6%                                          6.3%
  1.1%

                                33.1%
                                                                                 30.3%
                                                                                                                               19.2%
         UNITED                                           INDIA                                         CHINA                                         BRAZIL
         STATES
                         3.7%                                             0.6%                                          0.6%

                            MEXICO                                         GERMANY                                        UNITED
                                                                                                                         KINGDOM
                                                                   Agriculture      Industry     Services

Figure 19 shows the economic relationship between the employment sector
and contribution of that sector to the overall economy. In the United States,
Germany, and the United Kingdom, the proportion of workers in each sector is
similar to the economic benefit to those economies. However, in India and China,
a disproportionate number of workers are employed in agriculture. Nearly 50% of
all workers in India participate in the agricultural sector, but produce less than 10%
of that country’s GDP. Countries such as India, China, Brazil, and Mexico struggle
to feed their populations and expend more effort to produce their domestic food
supplies than the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

The drain of agriculture on the economies of developing countries tends to affect
the service economy of those countries in contrast to the United States where higher
levels of educational attainment support a massive and growing service economy.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                              21
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

                         FIG. 20: SERVICES AS A PERCENTAGE OF GDP

80
                                                                                                             Services (Figure 20) have been
                                                                                                             growing everywhere and in the
75
                                                                                                             United States may represent nearly
                                                                                                             80% of the economy by 2020.
70
                                                                                                             Contributing to this growth are
                                                                                                             the generational cycles. Millennials
65
                                                                                                             will continue to push the service
60
                                                                                                             economy to new heights, paralleling
                                                                                                             the demands that the Baby Boom
55
                                                                                                             population put on consumer goods.

50

45
     1990       1994         1998        2002         2006          2010              2014      2018

                         UNITED STATES          EURO AREA                EAST ASIA
                         WORLD                  LATIN AMERICA            SOUTH ASIA

                                                                                        FIG. 21: MANUFACTURING AS A PERCENTAGE OF GDP

Interestingly enough, the economic                           40

crisis from 2008-2010 appears
to have had an inverse effect on
                                                             35
services (showing growth) compared
to manufacturing, in which broad
reductions in the representation                             30

of the sector occurred. One likely
global outcome of the economic
crisis was a dynamic boost in service                        25

economy production at the expense
of manufacturing. Competition in                             20
the United States and around the
world for services may continue to
be increasingly competitive.                                 15
                                                                  1990          1994         1998        2002      2006          2010         2014   2018

                                                                                             UNITED STATES       EURO AREA              EAST ASIA
                                                                                             WORLD               LATIN AMERICA          SOUTH ASIA

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                                                 22
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
GLOBAL UNEMPLOYMENT

Figure 22 shows the major trends in unemployment in the targeted economies.
The effects of the global economic crisis of 2008-2010 are reflected in this figure.
The economies of the United States, Europe, and Latin America (which are closely
linked) experienced large unemployment swings. In the case of Europe, the
economy has not yet fully recovered.

Since 1997, there have been three key events marked by 16-year cycles. Currently,
unemployment is low both in the United States and in many other parts of the
world. Some models indicate the current trend will begin to reverse itself over the
next three years.

                            FIG. 22: UNEMPLOYMENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF WORKFORCE

14
                                                      16-YEAR PHASE                            16-YEAR PHASE

12

10

8

 6

4

2
     1991    1993    1995     1997     1999    2001   2003    2005      2007     2009       2011    2013       2015   2020

                                     UNITED STATES      EURO AREA              EAST ASIA
                                     WORLD              LATIN AMERICA          SOUTH ASIA

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                                       23
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017                                                                     24

                       hickey & associates
                       COMPANY BACKGROUND
                  we assist companies in selecting the best location to
                  expand, relocate, or consolidate anywhere in the world while
                  achieving vital savings to help grow and sustain business

                  H&A, founded in 1986, was one of the first companies to offer integrated site location
                  and workforce services. Today, as the global leader, H&A has active projects in every
                  corner of the world led by our team of seasoned professionals, with additional support
                  from Subject Matter Experts in key global markets.

                  By having a presence in key markets throughout the world, H&A ensures our services
                  are always aligned with each unique local environment and provides our clients with an
                  unparalleled level of support.

                  H&A has offices strategically located around the globe, including New York City,
                  Chicago, London, San Francisco, Bangalore, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo, Singapore,
                  Montreal, São Paulo, and Mexico City.

© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
30              years in the industry                                           29           locations globally

400+                       projects in 2016                                     32%                     savings per project

$2b                   savings captured annually

DISCLAIMER
This report is published for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon in any way. Although high standards have been
used in the preparation of the information analysis, views and projections presented in this report, no responsibility or liability whatso-
ever can be accepted by Hickey & Associates LLC for any loss or damage resultant from any use of, reliance on or reference to the con-
tents of this document. As a general report, this material does not necessarily represent the view of Hickey & Associates LLC in relation to
particular properties or projects.

© Copyright 2017 Hickey & Associates LLC

Reproduction of this report in whole or in part is not allowed without prior written approval of Hickey & Associates LLC.

SITETRENDS: WAR FOR TALENT - JULY 2017
        www.hickeyandassociates.com                                                                                                 25
© 2017 Hickey & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
You can also read