Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity: an Austral Yungas case study

Page created by Perry Nguyen
 
CONTINUE READING
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity: an Austral Yungas case study
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity:
              an Austral Yungas case study
                                      GRIET AN ERICA CUYCKENS, NOELIA VIVIANA GONZALEZ BAFFA TRASCI
                                                     P A B L O G A S T Ó N P E R O V I C and L U C I O R I C A R D O M A L I Z I A

              Abstract Extensive cattle ranging is an important economic                                      Introduction
              activity in mountains, with diverse effects on native mam-
              mal communities. The effects of cattle Bos taurus can be
              negative, positive or neutral, mostly depending on the stock-                                   F    ree-ranging cattle affect native fauna, species interac-
                                                                                                                   tions and ecological communities across geographical re-
                                                                                                              gions in a variety of ways (Elliott & Barrett, ; Moser &
              ing rate. We examined the effect of cattle on the diversity
              and abundance of native mammalian species in the                                                Witmer, ; Hettinger, ; Pia et al., ; Shepherd &
              Austral Yungas region of Argentina, considering environ-                                        Ditgen, ; Chaikina & Ruckstuhl, ). In forest
              mental variables, land protection status, and human influ-                                      ecosystems in Australia, the presence of free-ranging cattle
              ence. Using , trap-nights from  camera-trap                                             negatively affects vegetation regeneration by compacting
              stations over  years (–), we calculated a relative                                    the soil through trampling and diminishing the abundance
              abundance index using camera events and used generalized                                        of seedlings by grazing (Eldridge et al., ). In South
              linear models to estimate the effect of cattle on small mam-                                    American forests, the effect of cattle Bos taurus is hetero-
              mals, large herbivores, species of conservation concern and                                     geneous and studies have been restricted to a few forest eco-
              felids. Cattle had different effects on each group of native                                    systems and ecological variables (Mazzini et al., ).
              mammals. We observed a lower abundance of large native                                              The intensive use of the forest understorey by cattle can
              herbivores and the absence of small mammals in areas                                            cause a reduction in plant biomass, potentially reducing the
              with high cattle abundance. The tapir Tapirus terrestris, jag-                                  complexity of the understorey (Loeser et al., ) and in-
              uar Panthera onca and white-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari                                       creasing the density of shrubs resistant to browsing
              are rare in the Yungas and therefore potentially vulnerable                                     (Vandenberghe et al., ), thus changing forest structure
              to extinction there. Conservation of small felids and low cat-                                  and composition. These changes in vegetation could have
              tle abundance could be compatible, but felids are threatened                                    both direct and indirect effects on native mammal biodiver-
              by other anthropogenic influences. Native mammalian di-                                         sity. By affecting the understorey of forests and reducing ref-
              versity and richness were related to land protection status.                                    uge and food availability, cattle have the potential to affect
              The entire ecoregion is potentially suitable for cattle, sug-                                   small forest mammals negatively (Tabeni et al., ). Cattle
              gesting the potential for further threats, and that cattle                                      may also affect large native herbivores by reducing food
              should be excluded from strictly protected areas. To ensure                                     diversity and competing for pastures (Madhusudan,
              extensive cattle ranging is compatible with wildlife conser-                                    ). By altering small mammal abundance (i.e. prey for
              vation in areas where exclusion is not possible, we recom-                                      carnivores), cattle also cause cascading effects on higher
              mend improved management of cattle and moderate                                                 trophic levels (Pia et al., ).
              stocking rates.                                                                                     The influence of cattle is not straightforward (Hettinger,
                                                                                                              ) and is mainly determined by the stocking rate
              Keywords Bos taurus, cattle, empty forest, human foot-                                          (Schieltz & Rubenstein, ). Mammalian species exhibit
              print, livestock, national parks, niche-based distribution                                      different responses linked to their specific life traits
              modelling, threatened species                                                                   (Suraci et al., ). Forest specialist mammal species decline
              Supplementary material for this article is available at                                         rapidly when forest cover decreases and are unlikely to be
              doi.org/./S                                                               found in secondary forests, whereas non-specialists survive
                                                                                                              in human-modified habitats (Newbold et al., ), and
                                                                                                              some species such as the white-eared opossum Didelphis al-
                                                                                                              biventris and Molina’s hog-nosed skunk Conepatus chinga
              GRIET AN ERICA CUYCKENS (Corresponding author, orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-                        could benefit from cattle-modified habitat (Di Bitetti et al.,
              8916, grietcuyckens@yahoo.com), NOELIA VIVIANA GONZALEZ BAFFA TRASCI
              ( orcid.org/0000-0001-5666-8614) and LUCIO RICARDO MALIZIA Instituto de                         ).
              Ecorregiones Andinas–Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Consejo Nacional de                             To ensure the protection of biodiversity, a total exclusion
              Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas and Centro de Estudios
              Territoriales Ambientales y Sociales, Alberdi 47, 4600 San Salvador de Jujuy,
                                                                                                              of cattle and strict controls against hunting are imposed
              Argentina                                                                                       by national parks in Argentina (IUCN category II pro-
              PABLO GASTÓN PEROVIC Administración de Parques Nacionales, Salta, Argentina                     tected areas). Other categories (VI) allow traditional cattle
              Received  December . Revision requested  July .
                                                                                                              raising. In regions where cattle are managed extensively
              Accepted  October .                                                                       and with little veterinary control, the management of a

              This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which permits re-use,
              distribution, reproduction, transformation, and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited and any transformation/adaptation is distributed
              under the same Creative Commons licence.
              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity: an Austral Yungas case study
878         G. A. E. Cuyckens et al.

                site plays a fundamental role in the local stocking rate, and                          Species groups
                therefore in fauna conservation (Schieltz & Rubenstein,
                ).                                                                                 Of the recorded species, we selected four groups that can
                    Since the s, the range of domestic cattle in Argentina                         potentially be influenced by cattle. By reducing refuge and
                has expanded into areas marginal for agriculture, mostly                               food availability for small mammals (Tabeni et al., ),
                forested areas (Guevara et al., ) such as the Austral                              we expected a negative influence of cattle on the presence
                Yungas in the north-west. In the Argentine Yungas, cattle                              and relative abundance of small mammal species. In
                raising entails releasing cattle into the forests, without nu-                         this group we included unidentified small mammals
                tritional supplements and with little to no management                                 (i.e. #  kg), the agouti Dasyprocta sp. and the tapeti
                (Quiroga et al., ). This extensive ranging of livestock,                           Sylvilagus brasiliensis. Cattle may also affect large native
                combined with selective logging and firewood extraction,                               herbivores by reducing food diversity and competing for
                has adverse effects on the structure of native forests                                 pastures (Madhusudan, ). In the large herbivore species
                (Campanello et al., ; Blundo et al., ). However,                               group we included the red brocket deer Mazama americana
                the effect of cattle has not been considered as an explanatory                         and gray brocket deer Mazama gouazoubira. We expected a
                variable when examining patterns of mammalian diversity,                               lower relative abundance of both species with higher cattle
                nor is it known how cattle affect fauna in one of the most                             abundance, and absence of the species at a certain, un-
                biodiverse ecosystems in Argentina.                                                    known, threshold of cattle abundance. We predict similar
                    We aimed to assess the effect of cattle on the native mam-                         effects on these two species, and therefore we pooled data
                malian community of the Austral Yungas and any potential                               for a more robust statistical analysis. For species of conser-
                interaction with altitude, latitude and land protection status.                        vation concern we included threatened species based on
                We considered four species groups: small mammals, large                                national and/or international standards (Ministerio de
                herbivores, species of conservation concern and the felid                              Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible & Sociedad Argentina
                community. We also examined the potential of cattle to in-                             para el Estudio de los Mamíferos, ; IUCN, ): the
                habit the Yungas ecoregion on a regional scale. We expected                            lowland tapir Tapirus terrestris, white-lipped peccary Tayassu
                () lower mammalian richness and diversity at higher alti-                             pecari and jaguar Panthera onca. Based on the potential
                tudes, increasing latitude and in areas of lower protection                            influence of cattle on the relative abundance of small mam-
                status, () lower abundance or absence of the four species                             mals and cascading effects on higher trophic levels (Pia
                groups in areas with greater cattle abundance and anthropo-                            et al., ), we expect a negative influence of cattle on the
                genic influence, and () that cattle could potentially inhabit                         presence and relative abundance of small and medium-
                the entire Yungas ecoregion.                                                           sized felids. This group comprised the medium-sized ocelot
                                                                                                       Leopardus pardalis, and five small felids: jaguarundi
                                                                                                       Herpailurus yagouaroundi, Pampas cat Leopardus colocolo,
                                                                                                       Geoffroy’s cat Leopardus geoffroyi, oncilla Leopardus
                Study area
                                                                                                       tigrinus and margay Leopardus wiedii (Table ).
                The study area is the Austral Yungas of Argentina (sensu
                Brown & Pacheco, ) on the eastern slope of the Andes.                              Camera-trap survey
                This ecoregion is characterized by subtropical cloudy
                montane forests and has an altitudinal gradient of vege-                               We placed  camera stations:  in national parks,  in
                tation physiognomy and species composition (Brown et al.,                              provincial reserves,  in private protected areas,  in
                ). The Yungas is considered a vulnerable ecosystem                                 private lands without protection,  in state properties
                (Olson & Dinerstein, ) of high conservation value                                  without management, and nine in Indigenous territories.
                (Malizia et al., ) because of the high faunal diversity                            The trapping period was  January – September
                (Narosky & Yzurieta, ; Ojeda, ). Cattle were intro-                             (, effective trap-nights). We recorded geographical
                duced into the region c.  years ago (Brown & Grau, ),                           coordinates and altitude at each point using a GPS.
                but their distribution is limited by the terrain and therefore                         Camera-trap stations consisted of one camera, generally
                cattle density is highly variable.                                                     located along a trail, road or river bank, to optimize the
                                                                                                       capture of larger mammals, which prefer to walk along lin-
                                                                                                       ear features (Harmsen et al., ). In some cases, to ensure
                Methods                                                                                cameras were not interfered with or stolen, we placed
                                                                                                       them in the forest interior. The mean distance between
                We surveyed using camera traps across latitudinal and                                  nearest neighbouring cameras was . ± SD . km. Cam-
                altitudinal gradients in areas with forest cover (Fig. ).                             eras were programmed to obtain a set of three photographs,
                To measure the success of our method, we developed a po-                               with a -minute delay between successive sets, and were
                tential species list for the Yungas forests (Table ).                                 active continuously.

                           Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity            879

                                                                                                                                                  FIG. 1 Study area and location
                                                                                                                                                  of camera traps in the Austral
                                                                                                                                                  Yungas of Argentina. Size of
                                                                                                                                                  circles indicates the number of
                                                                                                                                                  native mammalian species
                                                                                                                                                  recorded per camera trap.

              Environmental variables                                                                 brooks, rills and runnels). All  variables were projected
                                                                                                      to the WGS datum and were at a spatial resolution of
              We used  bioclimatic variables (Karger et al., ). From                             arc-seconds or resampled at this pixel size, equivalent
              altitude, we derived slope and roughness, using QGIS ..                             to c.  km.
              (QGIS, ), which we also used for all other geographical
              analyses. We obtained the human influence index from
              WCS & CIESIN (); this index incorporates human                                      Mammalian diversity
              population pressure, human land use, infrastructure and
              human access. Values range from  (no influence) to                                  We identified all large and medium-sized animals recorded
              (maximum influence). We obtained the coupled evapo-                                     by the camera traps to species level, noting whether they
              transpiration and gross primary production (hereafter re-                               were native or exotic, and calculated diversity indices for
              ferred to as primary production) from the National                                      the native species. Records were considered independent
              Tibetan Plateau Data Center (Zhang et al., , ;                                  when they were at least  h apart. From the number of events
              Gan et al., ), and we generated Euclidean distances                                 and effort (i.e. the number of effective camera-trap nights
              from cameras to the nearest water line (rivers, streams,                                of each camera), we calculated the relative abundance

              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
880         G. A. E. Cuyckens et al.

                TABLE 1 Species of large and medium-sized native and exotic mammals that could potentially occur in the Austral Yungas (Ministerio de
                Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible & Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos, ; Fig. ), with the species group for those
                species included in our analysis (i.e. small mammals, large herbivores, species of conservation concern and felids), national and IUCN Red
                List status for native species, and whether or not recorded in our camera-trap study during –. The table does not include uniden-
                tified small mammal species.

                                                                                                           National                                          Native/
                Species (by family)                                            Species group               status1              Red List status2             exotic            Recorded
                Didelphidae
                White-eared oposum Didelphis albiventris                                                   LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Thick-tailed oposum Lutreolina massoia                                                     NT                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Mymercophagidae
                Southern tamandua Tamandua tetradactyla                                                    NT                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Giant anteater Myrmecophaga tridactyla                                                     VU                   VU                           Native            Yes
                Dasypodidae
                Armadillo Dasypus mazzai                                                                   DD                   DD (as Dasypus               Native            No
                                                                                                                                yepesi)
                Nine-banded long-nosed armadillo Dasypus                                                   LC                   LC                           Native            No
                   novemcinctus
                Six-banded armadillo Euphractus sexcinctus                                                 LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Cebidae
                Brown capuchin monkey Sapajus cay                                                          VU                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Canidae
                Crab-eating fox Cerdocyon thous                                                            LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Pampas fox Lycalopex gymnocercus                                                           LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Domestic dog Canis lupus                                                                                                                     Exotic            Yes
                Felidae
                Jaguarundi Herpailurus yagouaroundi                            Felid                       LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Pampas cat Leopardus colocolo                                  Felid                       VU                   NT                           Native            Yes
                Geoffroy’s cat Leopardus geoffroyi                             Felid                       LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Oncilla Leopardus tigrinus                                     Felid                       VU                   VU                           Native            Yes
                Ocelot Leopardus pardalis                                      Felid                       VU                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Margay Leopardus wiedii                                        Felid                       VU                   NT                           Native            Yes
                Cougar Puma concolor                                                                       LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Jaguar Panthera onca                                           Conservation                CR                   NT                           Native            Yes
                                                                               concern
                Domestic cat Felis catus                                                                                                                     Exotic            No
                Mustelidae
                Molina’s hog-nosed skunk Conepatus chinga                                                  LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Neotropical river otter Lontra longicaudis                                                 NT                   NT                           Native            No
                Tayra Eira barbara                                                                         NT                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Little grison Galictis cuja                                                                LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Procyonidae
                Crab-eating raccoon Procyon cancrivorus                                                    LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                South American coati Nasua nasua                                                           LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Tapiridae
                Lowland tapir Tapirus terrestris                               Conservation                VU                   VU                           Native            Yes
                                                                               concern
                Tayassuidae
                Collared peccary Pecari tajacu                                                             VU                   LC                           Native            Yes
                White-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari                            Conservation                EN                   VU                           Native            Yes
                                                                               concern
                Cervidae
                Red brocket deer Mazama americana                              Herbivore                   VU                   DD                           Native            Yes
                Gray brocket deer Mazama gouazoubira                           Herbivore                   LC                   LC                           Native            Yes
                Leporidae
                Tapeti Sylvilagus brasiliensis                                 Small mammal                LC                   EN                           Native            Yes
                Common hare Lepus europaeus                                                                                                                  Exotic            No
                Sciuridae
                Yungas squirrel Sciurus ignitus                                                                                                              Native            Yes

                           Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity                881

              TABLE 1 (Cont.)
              Species (by family)                                             Species group               National             Red List status2             Native/          Recorded
                                                                                                          status1                                           exotic
              Erithizontidae
              Bicolored-spined porcupine Coendou bicolor                                                  VU                   LC                           Native           No
              Prehensile-tailed porcupine Coendou prehensilis                                             VU                   LC                           Native           No
              Hydrochaeridae
              Capybara Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris                                                          LC                   LC                           Native           No
              Dasyproctidae
              Yungas agouti Dasyprocta sp.                                    Small mammal                LC                   LC                           Native           Yes
              Myocastoridae
              Coypu Myocastor coypus                                                                      LC                   LC                           Native           No
              Suidae
              Pig Sus scrofa                                                                                                                                Exotic           Yes
              Bovidae
              Cattle Bos taurus                                                                                                                             Exotic           Yes
              Equidae
              Horse Equus caballus                                                                                                                          Exotic           Yes
              Donkey Equus asinus                                                                                                                           Exotic           Yes
              Ovidae
              Sheep Ovis aries                                                                                                                              Exotic           Yes
              Capridae
              Goat Capra sp.                                                                                                                                Exotic           Yes
              
              Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible & Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos ().
              
              IUCN ().
              DD, Deficient Data; LC, Least Concern; NT, Near Threatened; EN, Endangered; CR Critically Endangered.

              index (RAI) as:                                                                         abundance, primary production and the human influence
                                                                                                      index; for species of conservation concern: cattle abun-
                                    RAIi = ntot/daystot × 100                                (1)      dance, primary production, human influence index, land
              where ntot is the number of independent events of the ith                               protection status and distance to water lines; for the felid
              species and daystot is the total number of effective trap-                              community: cattle relative abundance index and the
              nights, using the package camtrapR (Bengsen et al., ;                               human impact index. For presence/absence models, we
              Mandujano & Pérez-Solano, ) in R .. (R Core                                     used the negative binomial error and Gaussian distributions
              Team, ). We calculated two measures of diversity,                                   for abundance, using the package MASS (Venables & Ripley,
              using the package vegan (Oksanen et al., ) in R: species                            ) in R. We checked for homogeneity by plotting resi-
              richness (S) and the Shannon–Weaver index (H). The latter                               duals vs fitted values, for normality using quantile-quantile
              was calculated as:                                                                      plots, and for independence by plotting residuals vs each ex-
                                                                                                      planatory variable. Because we had several combinations of
                                             S
                                  H=−                  RAI i × ln(RAI i )                    (2)      variables and therefore multiple models, we used single-
                                                 i=1
                                                                                                      term deletions to obtain the most parsimonious model,
              The value of the relative abundance index increases with in-                            using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC; Burnham &
              creasing richness and evenness in the abundance of species                              Anderson, ).
              in the community.
                 We developed generalized linear models (GLM) to
              examine the effect of cattle and land protection status on                              A niche-based model for cattle
              S and H. As biodiversity follows global patterns, with an in-
              crease in species richness toward the tropics and a decline in                          Species distribution models examine the potential influence
              species richness with increasing elevation (Pianka, ;                               of environmental variables on species presence. MaxEnt
              Lomolino, ; Hillebrand, ), we included altitude                                 finds the distribution of maximum entropy (i.e. the largest
              and latitude as factors in the models. For each of the four                             spread in a geographical dataset of species presences), sub-
              species groups we examined the potential influence of ex-                               ject to the constraint that the projected value of each variable
              planatory variables on presence/absence of species and on                               is close to its empirical average (Phillips et al., ). This
              relative abundance index; for small mammals: cattle abun-                               information can then be extrapolated to non-sampled
              dance and primary production; for large herbivores: cattle                              areas (Phillips et al., ).

              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
882         G. A. E. Cuyckens et al.

                FIG. 2 Mean native species richness recorded by camera traps set
                in areas of varying protection status. Boxes represent the
                interquartile range, box widths are proportional to the square
                root of the sample sizes, the horizontal solid line indicates the                      FIG. 3 Habitat suitability for cattle Bos taurus (from the
                median, and the whiskers indicate the % CI.                                          niche-based model) in relation to the human influence index.

                   The study area for modelling was the Yungas ecoregion                               recorded by  (%) cameras. Gray brocket deer had a
                with a -km buffer. We generated , random points                                relative abundance index of –, and red brocket deer
                to extract values for the environmental variables, and tested                          –. Among the species of conservation concern, the
                for correlations with the Pearson test, selecting only those                           lowland tapir had the highest relative abundance index (re-
                with a correlation # .. These were: mean diurnal tem-                                corded by  cameras), the white-lipped peccary had the
                perature range, temperature seasonality, mean temperature                              lowest relative abundance index (three cameras) and the jag-
                of wettest quarter, precipitation of driest quarter, precipita-                        uar was recorded by  cameras. The ocelot was the most
                tion of warmest quarter, roughness, human influence index,                             abundant felid species, followed by the margay, jaguarundi,
                and distance to nearest water lines.                                                   oncilla, Pampas cat and Geoffroy’s cat. The maximum num-
                   We used  presence records of cattle obtained from the                             ber of small and medium-sized felid species detected by one
                camera traps. We ran the species distribution model                                 camera was five.
                times and used the average outcome. To measure the general                                 Native species richness was almost % higher in nation-
                performance, we used the area under the receiver operating                             al parks and private protected areas than in provincial
                characteristic curve (AUC), which measures the probability                             protected areas, with intermediate values for Indigenous
                that a randomly chosen presence point will rank above a                                territories and private lands (Fig. ). Native species richness
                randomly chosen background point (AUC . = random;                                    and diversity decreased with altitude, without interactions
                values closer to  indicate better discrimination power;                               with cattle relative abundance index or latitude (Fig. ,
                Bellamy et al., ). We converted the model into a binary                            Table ).
                model by applying the minimum presence logistic threshold                                  Presence, but not relative abundance, of small mammals
                (.) and categorized habitat suitability for cattle into five                       and large native herbivores was influenced by cattle relative
                classes (very low: , .; low: .–.; medium: .–                             abundance index. For small mammals to be present, the
                .; high: .–.; very high: ˃ .) for visualization as                         relative abundance index of cattle had to be , , and large
                a map.                                                                                 herbivores were absent at a cattle relative abundance index
                                                                                                       of  and present at . Thus, to assure the presence of large
                                                                                                       herbivores, the number of independent cattle records
                Results                                                                                should not be greater than five times the number of effective
                                                                                                       trap-nights (for example, in a survey of  trap-nights the
                We recorded  native species, % of the species that could                           number of independent cattle events should be , ).
                potentially occur in the region (Table ), and seven exotic                            Lowland tapir relative abundance increased with distance
                species, with  of  cameras (%) recording at least                              from water lines and was not influenced by cattle relative
                one native species and  cameras (%) at least one exotic                           abundance index. Jaguar relative abundance and presence
                species. The range of species richness per camera was –                             were not significantly associated with any of the measured
                (mean .) for native and – (mean .) for exotic species.                           variables. Data for the white-lipped peccary could not be
                Bos taurus had the highest relative abundance index and was                            analysed because there were only three records. The
                also the most frequently recorded species. Other domestic                              human influence index negatively affected felid richness,
                species recorded were horses, pigs, goats and dogs.                                    but not relative abundance, with an abrupt decrease in rich-
                Domestic cats were not recorded.                                                       ness at a human influence index of $ . Primary produc-
                   Small mammals were recorded by  cameras (%).                                    tion did not influence the presence or relative abundance of
                Brocket deer (i.e. M. gouazoubira or M. americana) were                                small mammals or the tapir (Table ).

                           Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity         883

              TABLE 2 Generalized linear models for native species richness                           absent where the cattle relative abundance index was
              (number of species) and diversity (Shannon−Weaver index),                               above  and , respectively. Felids were negatively affected
              small mammal presence/absence, deer Mazama sp. presence/ab-                             by the human influence index but not by cattle relative
              sence, lowland tapir Tapirus terrestris relative abundance index
                                                                                                      abundance, suggesting that felids are influenced not by cat-
              and felid species richness in the Austral Yungas. Only significant
              models are presented, with t and P values for potentially influential
                                                                                                      tle directly but by activities related to their presence. As cat-
              variables.                                                                              tle have the potential to inhabit most of the Austral Yungas
                                                                                                      and their presence is associated with hunting, exotic species
                                                         t                     P                      (domestic dogs and cats), and selective logging (Perovic,
              Species richness                                                                        ), we recommend cattle should be reduced to abun-
              Latitude                                    0.036                0.846                  dances that allow coexistence with wildlife in all areas
              Altitude                                   −0.002                0.0002**               with forest cover, and excluded from strictly protected
              Protection status                          −0.850                2.75 × 10−08**
              Cattle relative abundance index            −0.005                0.415
                                                                                                      areas. Strictly protected areas (private or state-managed)
              Species diversity                                                                       are the only management regime ensuring long-term
              Latitude                                    0.060                0.197                  fauna conservation in the Yungas.
              Altitude                                   −4.96 × 10−04         1.54 × 10−06**             We recorded % of the native species that could poten-
              Land protection status                     −0.123                0.001*                 tially occur in the Austral Yungas and therefore we consider
              Cattle relative abundance index            −0.002                0.239                  our methodology successful. We did not record water-
              Small mammals                                                                           associated species such as the capybara Hydrochoerus hy-
              Cattle relative abundance index            −2.100                0.041*
                                                                                                      drochaeris, nutria Myocastor coypus and neotropical otter
              Primary productivity                       −0.078                0.938
              Deer                                                                                    Lontra longicaudis, the latter being rare in the Yungas
              Cattle relative abundance index                0.023             0.021*                 (Albanesi et al., ). As we did not place cameras in trees,
              Human influence index                          1.859             0.067                  our methodology was not suitable for detecting arboreal
              Tapir relative abundance index                                                          species such as the bicolored-spined porcupine Coendou
              Cattle relative abundance index            −0.039                0.781                  bicolor and prehensile-tailed porcupine Coendou prehensi-
              Primary productivity                        0.937                0.352                  lis, which are also rare. We did, however, record arboreal
              Distance to rivers                          2.070                0.042*
                                                                                                      species such as the capuchin monkey Sapajus cay and
              Felid species richness
              Cattle relative abundance index            −0.814                0.418                  Bolivian squirrel Sciurus ignitus, but on the ground. Only
              Human influence index                      −2.870                0.005*                 two of the six cingulate species (armadillos) were recorded,
                                                                                                      suggesting they have a naturally low relative abundance or
              *P , .; **P , ..
                                                                                                      are difficult to record with camera traps. A national-scale as-
                                                                                                      sessment indicated the need to protect these six species
                  We obtained a habitat suitability model for cattle with                             (Abba et al., ).
              AUC = .. Values . . are considered to indicate mod-                                  The niche-based distribution model for cattle shows their
              els with a good general performance (Phillips & Dudík,                                  potential to occupy almost the entire Yungas ecoregion ex-
              ). Cattle encounter suitable habitat in most (%) of                               cept for the mountain peaks, probably because of the low
              the Yungas, with higher habitat suitability towards lower la-                           winter temperatures, low carrying capacity and the difficulty
              titudes and lower suitability towards higher altitudes                                  of access for people. The positive association between habi-
              (Fig. ). Habitat suitability for cattle increases with the                             tat suitability for cattle and the human influence index is a
              human influence index, peaking at  and then decreasing                                result of the association of cattle with people, but areas with
              abruptly (Fig. ). Lower suitability corresponds to areas al-                           a human influence index ˃  are no longer suitable for cat-
              ready transformed into croplands, human settlements or                                  tle. The raster layer of suitable habitat for cattle could be
              roads (Fig. ).                                                                         used in areas not surveyed to estimate cattle presence locally,
                                                                                                      and could serve as a tool to analyse the effects of cattle in the
                                                                                                      Austral Yungas.
              Discussion                                                                                  Environmental variables, which are influenced by lati-
                                                                                                      tude and altitude, affect the diversity and composition of
              As far as we are aware, this is the first study to use a large                          native biodiversity. As predicted, we found a decrease in
              camera-trap data set for the Yungas ecoregion over an ex-                               species richness and diversity with an increase in elevation,
              tended period ( years) and the first to examine the factors                           in accordance with global patterns (Lomolino, ) and
              affecting the native mammalian community. In contrast to                                with a previous study in the northern Yungas (Di Bitetti
              our expectation, general mammalian species richness and                                 et al., ). We found high mountain areas in the Yungas
              diversity were not directly related to the cattle relative abun-                        to be naturally poorer in native and exotic species than for-
              dance index, but the latter affected two of the four groups of                          ests at lower elevations. The northern Austral Yungas has
              species studied. Small mammals and brocket deer were                                    higher species richness than the central and southern

              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
884         G. A. E. Cuyckens et al.

                                                                                                                                                FIG. 4 Presence records of cattle
                                                                                                                                                with (a) predicted habitat
                                                                                                                                                suitability (see text for details),
                                                                                                                                                and (b) the human influence
                                                                                                                                                index (see text for details) in the
                                                                                                                                                Austral Yungas of Argentina.

                                                                                                       ), depending on their management. National Parks in
                                                                                                       Argentina are legally required to exclude cattle, although
                                                                                                       this regulation is not always implemented. They are gener-
                                                                                                       ally larger and have stricter controls than provincial and pri-
                                                                                                       vate protected areas and have historically been established
                                                                                                       in areas with low potential for economic development
                                                                                                       (Margules & Pressey, ; Rodrigues et al., ), and
                                                                                                       hence could have a higher intrinsic value for conservation.
                                                                                                       Thus, various anthropogenic factors seem to be implicated
                                                                                                       in the persistence of native large mammals in these areas.
                FIG. 5 Native species richness per camera trap in relation to                          Indigenous territories, with intermediate cattle abundance,
                elevation during an -year camera-trap study in the Austral                           may contribute to conservation and offer a complementary
                Yungas of Argentina.                                                                   institutional model to state-run protected areas (Johnson &
                                                                                                       Nelson, ). Provincial protected areas, with higher cattle
                Austral Yungas and is the southern limit of the distributions                          relative abundance index, had the lowest diversity indices,
                of several mammal species (Sapajus cay, Tapirus terrestris,                            similar to unprotected areas (private or state property). In
                Leopardus wiedii), emphasizing the role of this part of the                            low-income countries, nature conservation is not neces-
                ecoregion in the conservation of these species. In contrast                            sarily a priority and so-called paper parks (i.e. protected
                to general patterns (Brown & Lomolino, ) and to                                    areas that only exist on paper and do not achieve conserva-
                those of small forest mammals in the Yungas (Ojeda et al.,                             tion goals), are common (Rodríguez & Rodríguez-Clark,
                ), we found that latitude did not influence native spe-                            ). Nevertheless, even paper parks matter (Rodríguez &
                cies richness and diversity, indicating a latitudinally homo-                          Rodríguez-Clark, ) if they still have forest cover. To re-
                genized native mammal community.                                                       verse the failure in the achievement of conservation objec-
                   Land protection status was the most important variable                              tives of such paper parks in Argentina and to achieve
                in explaining native mammalian biodiversity. We recorded                               conservation goals, we recommend lowering cattle relative
                the highest values of native species richness and diversity in                         abundance index to #  (the highest limit compatible with
                national parks, highlighting the importance of strictly pro-                           the presence of both deer and small mammals) and estab-
                tected areas and the complementary role of small private                               lishing adaptive management plans that include stricter
                protected lands (Johnson & Nelson, ; Kamal et al.,                                 controls than at present.

                           Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity                                885

                  Our findings indicate that high cattle abundance (relative                          cattle and human activities such as habitat destruction and
              abundance ˃ ) is incompatible with the presence of small                              hunting for food (peccaries) and in retaliation (jaguars), are
              mammals. Trampling and browsing by cattle reduce the het-                               probably having negative, synergistic effects on species of
              erogeneity of the forest understorey for this group (Smith                              conservation concern (Romero-Muñoz et al., ). These
              et al., ; Hayward et al., ). We could not identify                              species depend on protected forests with extensive cover
              small mammals to species level and the responses of indi-                               and protection against hunting.
              vidual species to cattle may vary (Schieltz & Rubenstein,                                  This is the first study based on an extensive camera-trap
              ). Nevertheless, when present, small mammals had high                               survey to provide evidence that cattle affect the assemblage
              relative abundance indices, so a prey base for medium-sized                             of mammals in the Austral Yungas, both directly and indir-
              and small felids remains available.                                                     ectly. We have provided guidelines for cattle abundance that
                  Small felids are indirectly affected by cattle, as indicated                        should be implemented in protected areas where cattle rais-
              by the human influence index. This index includes human                                 ing is allowed. However, we cannot provide guidelines for
              population pressure, human land use and infrastructure and                              cattle abundance compatible with species of conservation
              human access. Differential logging (i.e. logging of only par-                           concern (jaguar and white-lipped peccary), and their low
              ticular tree species and individuals of a certain size, resulting                       abundances indicate their high risk of extinction in this
              in impoverished species richness and affecting forest struc-                            region. Following Mazzini et al. (), we used directly
              ture) could also affect forest specialists such as the oncilla                          measured cattle relative abundance at the local scale and
              and margay. Therefore, we suggest direct hunting and asso-                              complemented this with an indirect method at the regional
              ciated activities, such as the presence of dogs (Perovic, )                         scale (distribution modelling). Our work therefore provides
              and habitat transformation, are underlying explanations for                             both a method for future assessments of cattle impacts and
              the influence of humans on felids, not the presence of cattle                           an indicator of potential cattle abundance in unsurveyed
              directly. We did not record domestic cats, so these may not                             areas in the Austral Yungas.
              yet be a threat to small felids in the Yungas. We found that
              the Vulnerable oncilla had the lowest relative abundance                                Acknowledgements We thank all field assistants and landowners
                                                                                                      who allowed us to conduct fieldwork, the Tinkunaku community,
              and was the rarest of the felid group and therefore its con-                            park rangers of the Secretariat of Environment and Sustainable
              servation status should be monitored.                                                   Development of Salta province, the National Park Administration of
                  In agreement with Nanni (), we found brocket deer                               Argentina; IDEA WILD for providing equipment; Leonidas
              only in areas with low cattle relative abundance. The human                             Lizarraga for help downloading data; Agustin Abba for assistance
              influence index did not affect these large herbivores, sug-                             with identification of ungulates; Tadeu de Oliveira for help with iden-
                                                                                                      tification of small felids; two anonymous reviewers for advice; and
              gesting a direct effect of cattle on these two species. In agree-
                                                                                                      Martin Fisher and the teachers and classmates of the Conservation
              ment with Mazzini et al. (), we suggest biological inter-                           Leadership Programme Writing for Conservation Course in Colombia.
              actions such as competition and dietary overlap between
              cattle and native herbivores are the cause of this effect.                              Author contributions Study conception: GAEC, LRM; study de-
                  Species of conservation concern had low relative abun-                              sign, fieldwork: GAEC, PGP; data input: GAEC, NGBT; data analysis:
                                                                                                      GAEC, writing: all authors.
              dance indices. Lowland tapir relative abundance was nega-
              tively influenced by distance to linear watercourses. Like the                          Conflicts of interest None.
              Malayan tapir Tapirus indicus and Baird’s tapir Tapirus
              baardii, which depend on proximity to water (Dudgeon,                                   Ethical standards This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on
              ; Reyna-Hurtado et al., ), lowland tapirs use                                   ethical standards.
              water banks to browse and mate, and enter the water to
              take refuge from predators (Brooks et al., ). Lowland
              tapir relative abundance was not negatively influenced by                               References
              cattle relative abundance index. Tapirs probably differ in
              feeding habits from cattle, browsing more on seedlings                                  A B B A , A.M., T O G N E L L I , M.F., S E I T Z , V.P., B E N D E R , J.B. & V I Z C A Í N O ,
              and fruits. Prey remains available for jaguars, but the ab-                                S.F. () Distribution of extant xenarthrans (Mammalia:
                                                                                                         Xenarthra) in Argentina using species distribution models.
              undance of wild prey is decreasing, which could provoke
                                                                                                         Mammalia, , –.
              jaguars to start predating on cattle, with consequent                                   A L B A N E S I , S.A., J AY AT , J.P., A L B E R T I , P. & B R O W N , A.D. () New
              escalations in human–predator conflict (Perovic, ;                                     record of river otter (Lontra longicaudis Olfers, ) in the extreme
              Cuyckens et al., ). The species of conservation concern                                south of Yungas Northwestern Argentina. IUCN/Species Survival
              considered here (lowland tapir, white-lipped peccary and                                   Commission Otter Specialist Group Bulletin, , –.
                                                                                                      B E L L A M Y , C., S C OT T , C. & A LT R I N G H A M , J. () Multiscale,
              jaguar) are large mammals, and body size is an indicator
                                                                                                         presence-only habitat suitability models: fine-resolution maps for
              of extinction risk (Cardillo, ) as it determines suscepti-                             eight bat species. Journal of Applied Ecology, , –.
              bility to hunting pressure and habitat selectivity. Our study                           B E N G S E N , A.J., L E U N G , L.K.-P., L A P I D G E , S.J. & G O R D O N , I.J. ()
              was in areas that still have forest cover. Hence, the effects of                           Using a general index approach to analyze camera-trap abundance

              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
886         G. A. E. Cuyckens et al.

                    indices: improving camera-trap abundance indices. The Journal of                                  production in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid
                    Wildlife Management, , –.                                                               Environments, , –.
                B L U N D O , C., G A S P A R R I , N.I., M A L I Z I A , A., C L A R K , M., G AT T I , G.,      H A R M S E N , B.J., F O S T E R , R.J., S I LV E R , S., O S T R O , L. & D O N C A S T E R ,
                    C A M P A N E L LO , P.I. et al. () Relationships among phenology,                            C.P. () Differential use of trails by forest mammals and
                    climate and biomass across subtropical forests in Argentina.                                      the implications for camera-trap studies: a case study from Belize.
                    Journal of Tropical Ecology, , –.                                                          Biotropica, , –.
                B R O O K S , D.M., B O D M E R , R.E. & M AT O L A , S. () Tapirs – Status,                  H A Y WA R D , B., H E S K E , E.J. & P A I N T E R , C.W. () Effects of livestock
                    Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Tapir Specialist Group,                                      grazing on small mammals at a desert Cienaga. The Journal of
                    IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.                                                       Wildlife Management, , –.
                B R O W N , A.D. & G R A U , H.R. () La Naturaleza y el Hombre                                H E T T I N G E R , N. () Defining and evaluating exotic species: issues
                    en las Selvas de Montaña. Proyecto GTZ – Desarrollo                                               for Yellowstone Park policy. Western North American Naturalist,
                    Agroforestal en Comunidades Rurales del Noroeste Argentino,                                       , –.
                    Salta, Argentina.                                                                             H I L L E B R A N D , H. () On the generality of the latitudinal diversity
                B R O W N , J.H. & L O M O L I N O , M.V. () Biogeography, nd edition.                           gradient. The American Naturalist, , –.
                    Sinauer Asociates, Inc., Sunderland, USA.                                                     IUCN () The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version -.
                B R O W N , A.D., G R A U , H.R., M A L I Z I A , L.R. & G R A U , A. ()                          iucnredlist.org [accessed  May ].
                    Argentina. In Bosques nublados del Neotrópico (eds M. Kapelle &                               J O H N S O N , K.A. & N E L S O N , K.C. () Common property and
                    A.D. Brown), pp. –. INBio, San José, Costa Rica.                                            conservation: the potential for effective communal forest
                B R O W N , A.D. & P AC H E C O , S. () Propuesta de actualización del                            management within a national park in Mexico. Human Ecology,
                    mapa ecorregional de la Argentina. In La Situación Ambiental                                      , –.
                    Argentina  (eds A. Brown, U. Martínez Ortíz, M. Acerbi &                                  K A M A L , S., G R O D Z I Ń S K A -J U R C Z A K , M. & B R O W N , G. ()
                    J. Corcuera), p. . Fundación Vida Silvestre, Buenos Aires,                                     Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a
                    Argentina.                                                                                        proposed classification system. Journal of Environmental Planning
                B U R N H A M , K.P. & A N D E R S O N , D.R. () Model Selection and                              and Management, , –.
                    Multimodel Interference: A practical Information-Theoretic                                    K A R G E R , D.N., C O N R A D , O., B Ö H N E R , J., K AW O H L , T., K R E F T , H.,
                    Approach. nd edition. Springer, New York, USA.                                                   S O R I A -A U Z A , R.W. et al. () Climatologies at high resolution for
                C A M P A N E L LO , P.I., G E N O V E VA G AT T I , M., A R E S , A., M O N T T I , L. &             the Earth’s land surface areas. Scientific Data, , .
                    G O L D S T E I N , G. () Tree regeneration and microclimate in a                         L O E S E R , M.R., M E Z U L I S , S.D., S I S K , T.D. & T H E I M E R , T.C. ()
                    liana and bamboo-dominated semideciduous Atlantic Forest.                                         Vegetation cover and forb responses to cattle exclusion: implications
                    Forest Ecology and Management, , –.                                                      for pronghorn. Rangeland Ecology & Management, , –.
                C A R D I L LO , M. () Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large                       L O M O L I N O , M.V. () Elevation gradients of species-density:
                    mammal species. Science, , –.                                                          historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography,
                C H A I K I N A , N.A. & R U C K S T U H L , K.E. () The effect of cattle                         , –.
                    grazing on native ungulates: The good, the bad, and the ugly.                                 M A D H U S U D A N , M.D. () Recovery of wild large herbivores
                    Rangelands, , –.                                                                             following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve:
                C U Y C K E N S , G., F A L K E , F. & P E T R AC C A , L. () Jaguar Panthera onca                livestock decline and wild herbivore recovery. Journal of Applied
                    in its southernmost range: use of a corridor between Bolivia and                                  Ecology, , –.
                    Argentina. Endangered Species Research, , –.                                          M A L I Z I A , L.R., P A C H E C O , S., B L U N D O , C. & B R O W N , A.D. ()
                D I B I T E T T I , M.S., D I B L A N C O , Y.E. & J I M É N E Z P É R E Z , J.I. ()              Caracterización altitudinal, uso y conservación de las Yungas
                    Cambios Asociados a la Presencia de Ganado Vacuno en los                                          Subtropicales de Argentina. Ecosistemas, , –.
                    Ensambles de Mamíferos de tres Ambientes de la Reserva Natural                                M A N D U J A N O , S. & P É R E Z -S O L A N O , L.A. (eds) () Fototrampeo en
                    Iberá, Corrientes, Argentina. Asociación Argentina de Ecología,                                   R: Organización y Análisis de Datos. Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa,
                    Buenos Aires, Argentina.                                                                          Mexico.
                D I B I T E T T I , M.S., A L B A N E S I , S.A., F O G U E T , M.J., D E A N G E LO , C. &       M A R G U L E S , C.R. & P R E S S E Y , R.L. () Systematic conservation
                    B R O W N , A.D. () The effect of anthropic pressures and elevation                           planning. Nature, , –.
                    on the large and medium-sized terrestrial mammals of the                                      M A Z Z I N I , F., R E LVA , M.A. & M A L I Z I A , L.R. () Impacts of
                    subtropical mountain forests (Yungas) of NW Argentina.                                            domestic cattle on forest and woody ecosystems in southern South
                    Mammalian Biology, , –.                                                                     America. Plant Ecology, , –.
                D U D G E O N , D. () Tropical Stream Ecology. Elsevier/Academic                              M I N I S T E R I O D E A M B I E N T E Y D E S A R R O L LO S O S T E N I B L E & S O C I E D A D
                    Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.                                                                A R G E N T I N A P A R A E L E S T U D I O D E LO S M A M Í F E R O S ()
                E L D R I D G E , D.J., P O O R E , A.G.B., R U I Z -C O L M E N E R O , M., L E T N I C , M. &       Categorización de los Mamíferos de Argentina. cma.sarem.org.ar/es/
                    S O L I V E R E S , S. () Ecosystem structure, function, and                                  especies-nativas [accessed  September ].
                    composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock                                M O S E R , B.W. & W I T M E R , G.W. () The effects of elk and cattle
                    grazing. Ecological Applications, , –.                                                  foraging on the vegetation, birds, and small mammals of the Bridge
                E L L I O T T , H.W. & B A R R E T T , R.H. () Dietary overlap among axis,                        Creek Wildlife Area, Oregon. International Biodeterioration, , –.
                    fallow, and black-tailed deer and cattle. Journal of Range                                    N A N N I , A.S. () Dissimilar responses of the gray brocket deer
                    Management, , .                                                                              (Mazama gouazoubira), crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and
                G A N , R., Z H A N G , Y., S H I , H., Y A N G , Y., E A M U S , D., C H E N G , L. et al.           pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) to livestock frequency in
                    () Use of satellite leaf area index estimating evapotranspiration                             subtropical forests of NW Argentina. Mammalian Biology, , –.
                    and gross assimilation for Australian ecosystems: Coupled estimates                           N A R O S K Y , T. & Y Z U R I E T A , D. () Guía para la Identificación de las
                    of ET and GPP. Ecohydrology: Ecosystems, Land and Water Process                                   Aves de Argentina y Uruguay. Asociación Ornitológica del Plata,
                    Interactions, Ecohydrogeomorphology, , e.                                                   Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                G U E VA R A , J.C., G R Ü N WA L D T , E.G., E S T E V E Z , O.R., B I S I G AT O , A.J.,        N E W B O L D , T., H U D S O N , L.N., P H I L L I P S , H.R.P., H I L L , S.L.L., C O N T U ,
                    B L A N C O , L.J., B I U R R U N , F.N. et al. () Range and livestock                        S., L Y S E N KO , I. et al. () A global model of the response of

                             Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Effect of free-ranging cattle on mammalian diversity                               887

                  tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic                                   R O D R I G U E S , A.S.L., A N D E L M A N , S.J., B A K A R R , M.I., B O I T A N I , L.,
                  pressures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,                                  B R O O K S , T.M., C O W L I N G , R.M. et al. () Effectiveness of the
                  , .                                                                                       global protected area network in representing species diversity.
              O J E D A , R.A. () Biodiversidad y conservación de mamíferos de la                                  Nature, , –.
                  interfase tropical-templada de Argentina. In Biodiversidad y Uso de                              R O D R Í G U E Z , J.P. & R O D R Í G U E Z -C L A R K , K.M. () Even ‘paper
                  la Tierra: Conceptos y Ejemplos de Latinoamérica (eds                                                parks’ are important. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, , .
                  S.D. Matteucci, O.T. Solbrig, J. Morello & G. Halffter), pp. –.                            R O M E R O -M U Ñ O Z , A., B E N Í T E Z -L Ó P E Z , A., Z U R E L L , D., B A U M A N N ,
                  EUDEBA-UNESCO Colección CEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.                                                M., C A M I N O , M., D E C A R R E , J. et al. () Increasing synergistic
              O J E D A , R.A., B A R Q U E Z , R.M., S TA D L E R , J. & B R A N D L , R. ()                      effects of habitat destruction and hunting on mammals over three
                  Decline of mammal species diversity along the Yungas forest of                                       decades in the Gran Chaco. Ecography, , –.
                  Argentina. Biotropica, , –.                                                              S C H I E LT Z , J.M. & R U B E N S T E I N , D.I. () Evidence based review:
              O K S A N E N , J., B L A N C H E T , F.G., F R I E N D LY , M., K I N D T , R., L E G E N D R E ,       positive versus negative effects of livestock grazing on wildlife. What
                  P.R., M C G L I N N , D. et al. () vegan: Community Ecology Package.                             do we really know? Environmental Research Letters, , .
                  cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html [accessed                                       S H E P H E R D , J.D. & D I T G E N , R.S. () Human use and small mammal
                   December ].                                                                                   communities of Araucaria frests in Neuquén, Argentina.
              O L S O N , D.M. & D I N E R S T E I N , E. () The Global : priority                              Mastozoología Neotropical, , –.
                  ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical                             S M I T H , G.T., A R N O L D , G.W., S A R R E , S., A B E N S P E R G -T R A U N , M. &
                  Garden, , –.                                                                                 S T E V E N , D.E. () The effect of habitat fragmentation and
              P E R OV I C , P.G. () Ecología de la comunidad de félidos en las selvas                             livestock grazing on animal in remnants of gimlet Eucalyptus
                  nubladas del Noroeste argentino. PhD thesis. Universidad Nacional                                    salubris woodland in the Western Australian Wheatbelt. II. Lizards.
                  de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.                                                                      The Journal of Applied Ecology, , –.
              P H I L L I P S , S.J., A N D E R S O N , R.P. & S C H A P I R E , R.E. () Maximum               S U R AC I , J.P., G AY N O R , K.M., A L L E N , M.L., A L E X A N D E R , P.,
                  entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological                                     B R A S H A R E S , J.S., C E N D E J A S -Z A R E L L I , S. et al. () Disturbance
                  Modelling, , –.                                                                             type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans.
              P H I L L I P S , S.J. & D U D Í K , M. (). Modeling of species distributions                        Global Change Biology, , –.
                  with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation.                                      T A B E N I , S., S P I R I T O , F. & O J E D A , R.A. () Conservation of small
                  Ecography, , –                                                                               and medium-sized mammals following native woodland regrowth:
              P H I L L I P S , S.J., D U D Í K , M. & S C H A P I R E , R.E. () Maxent software                   a case study in a long-term UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, Argentina.
                  for modeling species niches and distributions. Version ...                                        Journal of Arid Environments, , –.
                  biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent [accessed                                    V A N D E N B E R G H E , C., S M I T , C., P O H L , M., B U T T L E R , A. &
                   May ].                                                                                        F R E L É C H O U X , F. () Does the strength of facilitation by nurse
              P I A , M.V., L Ó P E Z , M.S. & N O VA R O , A.J. () Effects of livestock on                        shrubs depend on grazing resistance of tree saplings? Basic and
                  the feeding ecology of endemic culpeo foxes (Pseudalopex culpaeus                                    Applied Ecology, , –.
                  smithersi) in central Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural,                            V E N A B L E S , W.N. & R I P L E Y , B.D. () Modern Applied Statistics with
                  , –.                                                                                         S. Springer, New York, USA.
              P I A N K A , E.R. () Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review                       WCS & CIESIN (W I L D L I F E C O N S E R VAT I O N S O C I E T Y & C E N T E R
                  of concepts. The American Naturalist, , –.                                                    F O R I N T E R N AT I O N A L E A R T H S C I E N C E I N F O R M AT I O N N E T W O R K )
              QGIS () QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source                                              () Last of the Wild Project, Version ,  (LWP-): Global
                  Geospatial Foundation Project. qgis.org/en/site/ [accessed  May                                    Human Footprint Dataset (Geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data
                  ].                                                                                               and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, USA. doi.org/./
              Q U I R O G A , P.A., F E R N Á N D E Z , H.R., S I R O M B R A , M.D. & D O M Í N G U E Z ,             HMHF [accessed  December ].
                  E. () Riparian forests and cattle management problems in                                     Y O U N G , T.P., P A L M E R , T.M. & G A D D , M.E. () Competition and
                  Andean subtropical streams: in the search of water quality                                           compensation among cattle, zebras, and elephants in a semi-arid
                  sustainability. Lilloa, , –.                                                                   savanna in Laikipia, Kenya. Biological Conservation, , –.
              R C O R E T E A M (). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical                              Z H A N G , M., L I U , Z. & T E N G , L. () Seasonal habitat selection of the
                  Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,                                           red deer (Cervus elaphus alxaicus) in the Helan Mountains, China.
                  Austria.                                                                                             Zoologia, , –.
              R E Y N A -H U R T A D O , R., S I M A -P A N T Í , D., A N D R A D E , M., P A D I L L A , A.,      Z H A N G , Y., K O N G , D., G A N , R., C H I E W , F.H.S., M C V I C A R , T.R.,
                  R E T A N A -G U I A S C O N , O. & S A N C H E Z -P I N Z Ó N , K. () Tapir                     Z H A N G , Q. & Y A N G , Y. () Coupled estimation of  m and -day
                  population patterns under the disappearance of free-standing water.                                  resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production
                  Therya, , –.                                                                                 in –. Remote Sensing of Environment, , –.

              Oryx, 2022, 56(6), 877–887 © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605321001538

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001538 Published online by Cambridge University Press
You can also read