Information Modeling for Lab-Devices - Part 1 - Dr. Matthias Arnold Aachen, 2018-07-04 - Spectaris
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Information Modeling for Lab-Devices – Part 1 Dr. Matthias Arnold Aachen, 2018-07-04 For internal use only
Workshop goal What? Develop a solid foundation for decision making about our next steps when moving forward. How? Apply a proven method of information-modeling onto two different example devices out of the groups portfolio/ scope in a „hands-on“ approach. Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 2
> Why > Challenges > How
Why? – Interoperability in the Laboratory
To achieve interoperability & connectivity for devices in
the life-science laboratory
As prerequisite for information integration
As enabler for “Laboratory 4.0 / Lab IoT”
As enabler for efficiency gains
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 4
> Why > Challenges > How > Information Modeling Principles & Patterns
Challenges Heterogeneity Multitude of Device Types Multitude of Vendors Multitude of Applications … We have to clearly define our focus: what’s in – what’s out? Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 6
> Why > Challenges > How > Information Modeling Principles & Patterns
How
What to focus on?
Source: Abstimmungsgespräch Spectaris-VDMA zu „OPC UA Wägetechnik“, VDMA, 2018-06-28
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 8
How What to focus on? Workflow & Application Centric > Who knows about all the different workflows & applications in the lab? Use-case Centric > Operation > Documentation > Maintenance & Service > Workflows & recipes > Sample Management Device Centric (Use-Cases) Source: https://diaryfromjapan.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/bioprocess-lab/ > Start with the Things we know best .. ✔ As device vendors we might focus on device specific aspects first! Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 9
How
Which kind of data?
Scientific/Quality Data
Lab-Operations
• Analytical data of Materials,
Products, ..
• Sequencing data
• Workflows & Samples
• ..
Operational Data
• Process values & set-points,
state, ..
Connectivity • Alarms, events, audit trails
• Programs, ..
Resource Data
• Verification & Qualification
• (Predictive) Maintenance
• Device Health & Wear
• Resource Utilization,
• Resource-Downtimes, ..
Source: From R&D to Manufacturing – Data transparency through connectivity unleashes efficiencies, Dr. Matthias Arnold
ISPE 2017 Europe Pharma 4.0 Conference, Verona 23.11.2017
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 10Digitalization Concepts Market Trends Source: Digital Factories 2020: Shaping the future of manufacturing (48 pp., PDF, no opt-in) PriceWaterhouseCoopers Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 11
How
The question of a-priori knowledge…
Device Type Specific Device Type Agnostic
Define a generic device model Define a generic system model
which reflects common which reflects generic aspects of
attributes like name, type, serial- tangible (device, component, ..)
number, version, state, .. and intangible (unit, function, ..)
elements
For each device type add specific Take a holistic view on a
services which reflect their multitude of device types and
capabilities, e.g. “temperature distill abstract recurring
control”, “speed control”, “pH- patterns, e.g. “continuous
measurement”, .. control function” instead of
“temperature control”
Get lost in an ever growing Utilize a limited set of patterns
matrix of services
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 12How What should we build on? 1. Select a protocol stack which suits our domain of laboratory things and utilize its building blocks > MQTT is nice (for pub/sub) but covers only layers 1..5 Information Model > JSON restful is nice (for req/resp) but covers only layers 1..5/6 > OPC looks appropriate & covers layers 1..7 ✔ 2. Choose a modeling approach which is able to handle the intrinsic heterogeneity Derived from http://gargasz.info/OSI-model/OSI_2014.jpg of our domain > Device type specific > Device type agnostic The challenge of true interoperability sits on top of ISO/OSI layer 7 Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 13
How
VisioNize – Unrivaled Diverse Portfolio Coverage
VisioNize Communication Protocols
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 14How
VisioNize – Consistent UI-Design and Experience
Consistent Cross Platforms
Consistent Cross Product Lines
Eppendorf AG | spectaris Intensivworkshop der AG "Vernetzte Laborgeräte" | Dr. Matthias Arnold| 2018-07-05/06 15Discussion
You can also read
