1015 S 3RD STREET CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW - Date: 05.11.2021 - City of Philadelphia
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
1015 S 3RD STREET CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW Date: 05.11.2021
Team Contents
Site Context ................
10 Min. Walk Radius ................ 03
Way Finding ................ 04
Street Images ........ 05-06
Land Use Map ................ 07
Civil Survey ................ 08
Zoning Plan ................ 09
Site Render ................. 10
Site Plan ................
Ground Floor Plan .................. 11
Roof Landscape Plan ................. 12
Site Render ................. 13
Pedestrian Experience ................
Sidewalk Condition ........... 14-15
Site Render ................. 16
Building Plans and Elevations ................
Floor Plans ........... 17-19
Elevations .......... 20-21
Facade ................
Material ................ 22
Site Section ................ 23
Renderings ........ 24-27
Checklists ................
Sustainability ................ 28
Streets Handbook Checklist ......... 29-35
1015 S 3RD STREET CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW
02
Date: 05.11.2021
Site
1 Sunoco Gas Station
2 Academy at Palumbo School
3 Italian Market
4 New World Plaza
1 2
3 5 5 St Paul Roman Catholic Church
4 6 George W. Nebinger School
6
7 Vare-Washington Elementary
12
7 11 8 Sacks Playground
9 Jefferson Sqaure
8
10 10 Courtyard Apartment At
Riverview
9 11 Steeple Loft
12 Southwark/ Queen Village
Community Garden
N
1015 S. 3RD STREET CONTEXT MAP
10 Minute Walk Radius
03
Neighborhood
L L A VISTA
BE L LAGE
N VI
E QUEE
LITTL
N
SAIGO
Neighborhood City Streets Transportation
Urban Arterial Septa Public Transportation
High Volume Pedestrian
676
Walkable Commercial Corridors
City Neighborhood Street
1015 S. 3RD STREET CONTEXT MAP
Way Finding
04
SITE
SITE
Looking North Looking South
SITE SITE
Looking West Looking East
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE CONTEXT
Aerial Images
05
1 2
3
4 5
TE
3 SI
1
4 5 2
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE CONTEXT
Street Images
06
SITE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-1 CMX-1
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL MIX-USE-2 CMX-2
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE CMX-3
INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL MIX-USE ICMX
INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL MIX-USE IRMX
RESIDENTIAL MIX-USE-1 RM-1
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED-5 RSA-5
ACTIVE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE SP-PO-A
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE CONTEXT
Land Use Map
07
TOTAL
AREA = 17,118.9 US SF
ALL EXISTING UTILITY LATERALS ARE TO
BE DISCONTINUED PRIOR TO THE START
OF DEMOLITION. FURTHER, IT IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY
COMPANIES PRIOR TO DISCONNECTING
AND DEMOLITION OF SAID UTILITIES
ALL EXISTING FEATURES WITHIN THE LIMIT
OF DISTURBANCE ARE TO BE REMOVED
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL EXISTING
FEATURES OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF
DISTURBANCE ARE TO REMAIN.
ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED
SHALL BE CAPPED OR PLUGGED.
LEGEND
RIGHT OF WAY/
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
DEPRESSED CURB
PROPERTY LINE
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
By: AGERARDI
U/G TELEPHONE LINE
U/G ELECTRIC LINE
OVERHEAD WIRE
ABBREVIATIONS WATER LINE
2020\20004138A\Engineering\ERSA\Rev-1\C-LAYT.dwg\C-01-ERSA Map
GAS LINE
P.D.S = PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT STANDARD LP= LIGHT POLE
COMBINED SEWER
U.S.S= UNITED STATE STANDARD TBR= TO BE REMOVED
FF= FINISH FLOOR MH= MANHOLE FENCE
UV= UNKNOWN VALVE BOL= BOLLARD MAJOR CONTOUR
DEP.= DEPRESSED GR= GRATE MINOR CONTOUR
CL= CENTER LINE TR= TO REMAIN SPOT ELEVATION
D.C. = DEPRESSED CURB TW= TOP OF WALL
TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
BC= BOTTOM OF CURB BW= BOTTOM OF WALL
10 0 10 20 GUTTER ELEVATION
TC = TOP OF CURB CP= CITY PLAN
BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION
UP = UTILITY POLE
SCALE : 1" = 10'
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE CONTEXT
Civil Survey
08
ZONING CHART ZONING KEYED NOTES
FURNISHI
AN)
LEY
WALKING
CITY PL
NE AL
3-1 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL / PARAPET
(NOT ON
BODI
3-2 PARAPET (SEE SECTION / ELEV. FOR HEIGHTS)
NG ZONE
78'-6 1/4" US PROPERTY LINE (78.333' DS)
BASE DISTRICT: RM-1
ZONE
3-3 ELEVATOR OVERRUN
3 - ROOF
90'-2 3/4" US PROPERTY LINE (90.000' DS)
ABUTTING DISTRICT: RM-1 /RSA-5
3-4 ROOF DECK
9'-0 1/2"0' DS)
EWALK 56'-11 1/4" 3-5
(9.00
12'-0" SID ELEVATOR & LOBBY PENTHOUSE
DS)
DISTRICT ACROSS STREET: RM-1
8'-6" 1-4 1-1
3'-6"
P.L. (20.000'
3-6 GREEN ROOF (MAINTENANCE ACCESS ONLY)
US PL
TYP
60'-0"
LOT AREA: 3-7
3-8
17,118.9
ROOF ACCESS STRUCTURE
US SF US SF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CURB (9'-0"X9'-0")
OVERLAYS: QUEEN VILLAGE
20'-0 1/2" US
13'-0 1/2"
23 CLASS 1 A BIKE
3-1 STALLS
±24'-4"
2 - FACADE
SOUTHWARKPORTION @ 1ST FLOOR AND NATIONAL HISTORIC DISTRICT
8'-8"
1-2 TYP 1-3 39'-0 3/4" 26'-0" US P.L. (25.935' DS)
RECESSED
15'-3"
USE: MULTI-FAMILY STRUCTURE
2-1 3-8 3-1 2-1
TYP RECESSED BALCONY @ 2ND - 4TH FLR
1-5
67 DWELLING UNITS (36 x 1.25)(1.5) = 67
25'-4"
3-6 1-1 6'-0"h FENCE (AT PROPERTY LINE, TYPE)
PARKING
1 - SITE
PARKING
1-1A 4'-0"H. FENCE (50% OPAQUE, MAX.)
3-8 3-8
±2'-6"
3-8
ZONING BONUSES: 1-2
GREEN ROOF:
PROPOSED STREET TREE (3' X 6' PIT TYP)
+25% ALLOWED UNITS
±16'-1 1/2
1-2 ±5'-8"
2-1 1-3 CLASS 1A BIKE STALLS ON ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
LOW INCOME HOUSING: +50% ALLOWED UNITS
4' DS)
88'-6 5/8"
STREET
0-2 1-4 ACCESS GATE
"
LLEY)
1-5
26'-11"
TY LINE (56.85
3-8 3-8 3-8 3-8 3-8 1-5 PROPOSED BIKE RACK
±11'-0"
PROJECT ADDRESS:
S 3RD LEGALLY OPEN)
US PROP
REET
3-5 3-3
14' ROW (A
TYP
0 - EXISTING
DIM. STANDARDS: ALLOWED PROPOSED
AMERICAN
CITY NE IDE - 12'-26'-12')
3-1
±39'-3 1/2"
O ST
0-1 WATER MANHOLE COVER
ET
COMMON 1015 S 3RD STREET
ERTY LIN
US PROPER
±15'-0"
D
PHILADELPHIA, PA
STRE
0- 2 FIRE HYDRANT
O
ROOF DECK 3-4 ±6'-4"
±8'-4"
IGHBORH
OPEN AREA: 4,279.8 SF (25%) MINSEAL: 4,450.9 SF (26%)
E / BLDG
0-1 3-4
PLAN -
±3'-2"
3-1
56'-11 15/16"
±7'-5 1/2"
2 3-8 TYP
(50' W
OCCUPIED AREA: 12,839.1 SF (75%) 12,668 SF (74%)
±7'-8"
±6'-7"
DIM (88.33
Z.1 2-1
3-7
TY
3-8 3-8 3-8 3-8
FRONT YARD SETBACK: 0’-0” 0’-0”
CI
±20'-2"
N
±20'-7"
3' DS)
(O
9'-0"
1-2
3-8 SIDE YARD: 12’ IF USED 0’ (NOT USED)
1015 SOUTH 3RD STREET
15'-4"
1-5
±3'-10 1/2
"
3-7
(AKA 1009-23 SOUTH 3RD ST) 14'-1 7/16" US PL
REAR YARD: 9’ 9’
HEIGHT: 38’ + 7‘ (bonus) (45’)
(14.084' DS)
N 5'-4" 67 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 3-6
1-4 NTE 45’
1'-6 1/4"
STREET TREES: 3 5
±25'-0"
2-1
0"
0"
© 2021 HARMAN DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTURE.
1-2 3-1 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
TYP
3-6 TYP BICYCLE RACKS(CLASS 1A) 23 STALLS 23 TYPE 1A STALLS
CONSULTANTS:
DS)
3-1
1-5
LINE (38.310'
BICYCLE RACKS(SIDEWALK) 0 STALLS 4 STALLS
0"
RIGHT-OF-WAY COMPONENTS:
9'-0"
0"
39'-10 1/4" REAR YARD
PROPERTY
PED. ZONE: FURN ZONE: BLDG ZONE:
16'-0"
1-2 41'-0"
0" 0" 0"
141'-6 13/16" US PROPERTY LINE (141.215' DS)
38'-4 7/8" US
20'-5 1/8" US PL
(20.378' DS)
1-1
TYP
S 3RD STREET: 8’-6” 3’-6” 0’-0”
38'-11" US PL (38.818 DS)
1 ZONING PLAN
Z.1 3/32" = 1'-0"
# DATE ISSUE / REVISION
1 03.11.2021 ZONING SUBMISSION
OVERRUN
VIF
3-5
3-3
3-7 3-7
10'-0"
10'-0"
MAX
MAX
3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1
PARAPET
PARA.
3'-6"
3-6 3-4 3-6 3-4
ROOF
2-1
3-1
4TH FLOOR HARMAN DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTS HEREBY
RESERVES IT'S COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND ALL
PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE DRAWINGS, IDEAS AND
NTE 45'-0" (38'-0" + 7'-0"= 45'-0" MAX
2-1 DESIGNS. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOT
TO BE REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED IN ANY
3-1 MANNER. THE INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET IS NOT
1015 SOUTH 3RD STREET
TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE
EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF HARMAN
3RD FLOOR DEUTSCH OHLER ARCHITECTS.
2-1
3-1
DRAWINGS PREPARED BY:
BL
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE CONTEXT
09
2ND FLOOR DRAWINGS CHECKED BY:
1-1 RS / EQ
Zoning Plan
2-1
DRAWING TITLE:
AVG GRADE:
20.36+20.5+23.48+22.95=
NLY
87.32/4 = 21.83'
AVG GRADE
1ST FLOOR ZONING SITE PLAN
REGION
S 3RD STREET
(50' WIDE - 12'-26'-12')
1015 S. 3RD STREET OVERALL DESIGN
.
10SITE PLAN
GROUND FLOOR
STUDIO
JR 1 -BED
1 - BED
2 - BED
3 - BED
COMMON AREA
MECH AREA
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE PLAN
Ground Floor Plan
11ROOF PLAN
ROOF ELEMENTS
1 GREEN ROOF
2 COMMON ROOF DECK
3 EGRESS STAIR TOWER
4 ELEVATOR LOBBY
5 CONDENSERS
SITE PLAN
LANDSCAPING
A
PLANTING 'A'
A CRATEGUS VIRIDIS
GREEN HAWTHORN
A 4 5
'WINTER KING'
A 2
3 SEDUM GREEN ROOF
CUTTING MIX
A 3
1 SEDUM ACRE
A
SEDUM ALBUM
SEDUM PURLUM
'JOHN CREECH'
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE PLAN
Roof Plan
121015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER
FRONT FACADE
13S. 3rd Street
1
C LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE D PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK E EGRESS WELL
A CONCRETE SIDEWALKS B PROPOSED STREET TREE
IN ENLARGED 3'X 6' PITS (W/ FLUSH WALK-ABLE GRATE) 1
F UTILITY POLE G EXISTING MANHOLE H PECO ACCESS WELL I BUILT-IN PLANTER
3 - BED MECH AREA
STUDIO 1 - BED
JR 1 -BED 2 - BED COMMON AREA
1015 S. 3RD STREET Pedestrian Experience
S 3RD STREET
141 2
1
A CONCRETE SIDEWALKS B LANDSCAPED AREAS C 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE D 6' HIGH ESTATE FENCE w/ GATE E RAMP F 3'-0" EGRESLL WELL WITH
GUARDRAIL & 3'-0" FENCE
G PERVIOUS PAVER
3 - BED MECH AREA
STUDIO 1 - BED
JR 1 -BED 2 - BED COMMON AREA 2
1015 S. 3RD STREET Pedestrian Experience
SIDE / REAR YARD CONDITIONS
151015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER
WASHINGTON AVE & E MOYAMENSING AVE
16METRICS
RESIDENTIAL BLDG
• 4-STORIES
• 51,247 SF GFA
• 67 DWELLING UNITS
• 23 BICYCLE STALLS
STUDIO
JR 1 -BED
1 - BED
2 - BED
3 - BED
COMMON AREA
MECH AREA
BASEMENT FLOOR
1015 S. 3RD STREET FLOOR PLANS
17METRICS
RESIDENTIAL BLDG
• 4-STORIES
• 51,247 SF GFA
• 67 DWELLING UNITS
• 23 BICYCLE STALLS
STUDIO
JR 1 -BED
1 - BED
2 - BED
3 - BED
COMMON AREA
MECH AREA
FIRST FLOOR
1015 S. 3RD STREET FLOOR PLANS
18METRICS
RESIDENTIAL BLDG
• 4-STORIES
• 51,247 SF GFA
• 67 DWELLING UNITS
• 23 BICYCLE STALLS
STUDIO
JR 1 -BED
1 - BED
2 - BED
3 - BED
COMMON AREA
MECH AREA
TYPICAL FLOOR
1015 S. 3RD STREET FLOOR PLANS
19DWELLING DWELLING LOBBY DWELLING
1 | WEST ELEVATION | 3RD ST UNIT UNIT UNIT
1
2| SOUTH ELEVATION ADJACENT STRUCTURE LIGHTWELL LIGHTWELL 2
1015 S. 3RD STREET BUILDING ELEVATIONS
201 | EAST ELEVATION BUILDING ADA RAMP BUILDING
BEYOND BEYOND
2
BUILDING LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL ADJACENT PROPERITY
BEYOND
2| NORTH ELEVATION 1
1015 S. 3RD STREET BUILDING ELEVATIONS
21MATERIALS
1 ATAS COMPOSITE
METAL PANEL
SLATE GREY
2 HORIZONTIAL METAL
1 GUARDRAIL
6 BRONZE
3
3 JELD-WEN VINYL WINDOWS
BRONZE
2
5
4 BRICK
BURNT CHIMNEY
4
5 FIBER-CEMENT LAP SIDING
COUNTRYLANE RED
6 FIBER-CEMENT LAP SIDING
SLATE GREY
1015 S. 3RD STREET MATERIAL
Facade Cladding
22ROOF
3
±46'-11 3/16" FROM AVERAGE
(72'-0" MAX)
4TH FLR
GRADE
UNITS
3RD FLR ELEVATOR OVERRIDE
301 WASHINGTON AVE 1024 E MOYAMENSING AVE 1025 E MOYAMENSING AVE
2 STORY STRUCTURE 2 STORY STRUCTURE 2 STORY STRUCTURE
2ND FLR
+/-30'-0" TALL +/-30'-0" TALL +/-30'-0" TALL
3'-6"
S 3RD STREET ROOF
E MOYAMENSING AVE
±46'-11 3/16" FROM AVERAGE
LOBBY
(ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN) (ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN)
(50 FEET WIDE / 12'-26'-12') (50 FEET WIDE / 12'-26'-12')
FIRST FLOOR
(72'-0" MAX)
4TH FLR
GRADE
CELLAR SLAB BEYOND
UNITS
3RD FLR
301 WASHINGTON AVE 1024 E MOYAMENSING AVE 1025 E MOYAMENSING AVE
2 STORY STRUCTURE 2 STORY STRUCTURE 2 STORY STRUCTURE
2ND FLR
+/-30'-0" TALL 6'-2"
S 3RD STREET
9'-0" +/-30'-0" TALL +/-30'-0" TALL
E MOYAMENSING AVE
LOBBY
(ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN) (ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN)
(50 FEET WIDE / 12'-26'-12')
39'-8" 12'-0" 26'-0" 12'-0" FIRST FLOOR 180'-4" 39'-8" 27'-7" 12'-0" 26'-0" 12'-0"(50 FEET WIDE / 12'-26'-12')
39'-8"
CELLAR SLAB BEYOND
6'-2" 9'-0"
39'-8" 12'-0" 26'-0" 12'-0" 180'-4" 39'-8" 27'-7" 12'-0" 26'-0" 12'-0" 39'-8"
A
PILOT HOUSE
BEYOND
1009 S 3RD ST 1011 S 3RD ST 1013 S 3RD ST
3 STORY 3 STORY 3 STORY
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE
+/-38'-0" TALL +/-38'-0" TALL +/-38'-0" TALL
UNITS
PILOT HOUSE
1025 S 3RD BEYOND
ST WASHINGTON AVE
1 STORY
STRUCTURE (ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN)
(100 FEET WIDE / 25'-50'-25')
+/-17'-0" TALL
1009 S 3RD ST 1011 S 3RD ST 1013 S 3RD ST
3 STORY 3 STORY 3 STORY
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE
+/-38'-0" TALL +/-38'-0" TALL +/-38'-0" TALL
UNITS
1025 S 3RD ST
1 STORY
WASHINGTON AVE B
STRUCTURE (ON CITY PLAN / LEGALLY OPEN)
(100 FEET WIDE / 25'-50'-25')
+/-17'-0" TALL
56'-11" 86'-5" 56'-9" 46'-0" 25'-1" 49'-9" 25'-2"
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
2778-56 MARTHA ST A
B
56'-11" 86'-5" 56'-9" 46'-0" 25'-1" 49'-9" 25'-2"
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
2778-56 MARTHA ST
1015 S. 3RD STREET SITE SECTIONS
-
231015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER VIEW 1
Aerial Rendering
241015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER VIEW 2
S 3RD STREET LOOKING NORTH
251015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER VIEW 3
S 3RD STREET, LOOKING SOUTH
261015 S. 3RD STREET RENDER VIEW 4
WASHINGTON AVE & E MOYAMENSING AVE
27Civic Sustainable Design Checklist – Updated September 3, 2019 Civic Sustainable Design Checklist – Updated September 3, 2019 Civic Sustainable Design Checklist – Updated September 3, 2019
Civic Design Review Sustainable Design Checklist Water E ciency
ASHRAE standard 90.1-2016 (LEED v4.1 Yes to energy star appliances +
metric). Achieve light fixtures
Sustainable design represents important city-wide concerns about environmental conserva on and
Maintain on-site vegeta on without The lanscaping will take 3 years to ce ca n in Energy Star for Not Energy Star Cert.
energy use. Development teams should try to integrate elements that meet many goals, including: Not Passive House
on. OR, Reduce of watering establish, during which time it will Mu family New Constru on (MFNC).
need irrigation. After this period the
(6) Outdoor Water Use requirements at least 50% from the on-site vegetation will be managed
Achieve Passive House Ce on
· Reuse of ex ng building stock calculated baseline for the site's peak Any sites within 1000 feet of an
without irrigation.
· Incorpora on of ex ng on-site natural habitats and landscape elements Yes, compliant filters will be installed
watering month. interstate highway, state highway, or
· Inclusion of high-performing stormwater control Sustainable Sites freeway will provide air lters for all
· Site and building massing to maximize daylight and reduce shading on adjacent sites (12) Indoor Air Quality and
regularly occupied spaces that have a
Transporta on
· Redu on of energy use and the produc on of greenhouse gases Provides vegetated and/or pervious Minimum E iency Repo ng Value
100% of the site will be pervious (MERV) of 13. Filters shall be installed
· Promo on of reasonable access to transporta on altern ves open space that is 30% or greater of the which included the green roof,
(7) Pervious Site Surfaces site's Open Area, as de ned by the landscaping in the rear, and pervious prior to occupancy.iv
The Sustainable Design Checklist asks for responses to speci c benchmarks. These metrics go above and zoning code. Vegetated and/or green pavers along the egress path. Produce renewable energy on-site that No, renewable energy will not be
beyond the minimum requirements in the Zoning and Building codes. All benchmarks are based on roofs can be included in this calcula n. (13) On-Site Renewable Energy will provide at least 3% of the project's produced on-site.
Conform to the stormwater an pated energy usage.
adap ons from Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 unless otherwise noted. Yes, all stormwater on the roof
requirements of the Philadelphia Water will be managed via the green roofs
Innova on
Categories Benchmark Does project meet Department(PWD) and either: A)
Develop a green street and donate it to Bike storage rooms have been
benchmark? If yes, please provided in each building, and bike
PWD, designed and constructed in Any other sustainable measures that
explain how. If no, please (14) Innova racks have been places near all
accordance with the PWD Green Streets could pos vely impact the public realm. enrtances, and along all streets
explain why not. (8) Rainwater Management
Design Manual, OR B) Manage
Loca on and Transporta on add onal runo from adjacent streets
on the development site, designed and
Locate a fun onal entry of the project Yes. constructed in accordance with
within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking - Bus 64 @ Washington&3rd St speci ons of the PWD Stormwater i
Railway Associa on of Canada (RAC)'s “Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway
(1) Access to Quality Transit distance of exis ng or planned bus, - Bus 57 @ 3rd St&Carpenter St Management Regula ns Opera ons. Exterior Sound transmission standard from LEED v4, BD+C, Acou c Performance Credit.
streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid Reduce the heat island e ect through All hardscapes will have a high
transit stops, light or heavy rail sta ons. either of the following strategies for reflectance of SRI>29.
The remaining 26% of open
ii
Title 4 The Philadelphia Building Construc on and Occupancy Code
All new parking areas will be in the rear n/a, (9) Heat Island Redu on 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes:
yard of the property or under the no parking has been proposed
area is hardscaped w/ light grey See also, “The Commercial Energy Code Compliance” informa on sheet:
(excluding roofs) A) Hardscapes that have a high concrete pavers or vegetated
(2) Reduced Parking Footprint building, and unenclosed or uncovered on this project
re ectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by areas. h ps://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/Commercial%20Energy%20Code%20Compliance%20Fact%20Shee
parking areas are 40% or less of the site trees, structures, or solar panels. t--Final.pdf
area. Energy and Atmosphere and the “What Code Do I Use” informa on sheet:
Designate 5% of all parking spaces used n/a, h ps://www.phila.gov/li/Documents/What%20Code%20Do%20I%20Use.pdf
by the project as preferred parking for no parking has been proposed
PCPC notes that as of April 1, 2019 new
green vehicles or car share vehicles. on this project 2018 IECC (RE) +
energy conserva n standards are PRESCRIPTIVE iii
LEED 4.1, Op mize Energy Performance in LEED v4.1
(3) Green Vehicles Clearly iden and enforce for sole use required in the Philadelphia Building
by car share or green vehicles, which For Energy Star: www.Energystar.gov
Code, based on recent updates of the
include plug-in electric vehicles and For Passive House, see www.phius.org
(10) Energy Commissioning and Interna nal Energy Conserva on Code
alterna ve fuel vehicles. Energy Performance - Adherence (IECC) and the op on to use ASHRAE
To foster safety and maintain a quality to the New Building Code 90.01-2016. PCPC sta asks the Sec on 99.04.504.6 "Filters" of the City of Los Angeles Municipal Code, from a 2016 Los Angeles
iv
of life protected from excessive noise We do not abut a railway
applicant to state which path they are Ordinance requiring enhan lters in homes near freeways
and vibra on, residen al development taking for compliance, including their
(4) Railway Setbacks
with railway frontages should be setback choice of code and any op ons being
(Excluding frontages facing
from rail lines and the building’s exterior pursued under the 2018 IECC. ii
trolleys/light rail or enclosed
envelope, including windows, should
subsurface rail lines or subways) Will the project pursue energy No Additional Measurements
reduce exterior sound transmission to
performance measures beyond what is
60dBA. (If setback used, specify
(11) Energy Commissioning and required in the Philadelphia code by
distance)i
Energy Performance - Going mee ng any of these benchmarks? iii
Incorporate a bike share sta on in No, no bike share stations are beyond the code Reduce energy consump on by
(5) Bike Share Sta coordina n with and conformance to Proposed
achieving 10% energy savings or more
the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.
from an established baseline using
1 2 3
1015 S. 3RD STREET Sustainability
-
28COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS (continued)
This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version
design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.
or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as
The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and
checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.
and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights-of-way. Departmental reviewers will use
this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11-901 of The All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus
Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to shelters, street signs and hydrants.
plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version. Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio-swales and other such features in the
right-of-way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.
The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at
http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx ADA curb-ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review
Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application
is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey-and-design-bureau/city-plans-unit . An application to the
Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:
o Placing of a new street;
o Removal of an existing street;
o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; or
o Placing or striking a city utility right-of-way.
Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*:
• EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale
o FULLY DIMENSIONED
o CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES
o TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING
o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS
o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS
• PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale
o FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND
PINCH POINTS
o PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES
o PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING
PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS
o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS
FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT: DATE
*APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL-SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE
REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY
1 2
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
29COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information
1. PROJECT NAME 2. DATE
1015 S. 3rd St. 05.11.2021
3. APPLICANT NAME 5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits
Rustin Ohler [HarmanDeutschOhler Architecture] and scope
4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION 17,118.9 SF
1225 N. 7th Street, 267-324-3601
6. OWNER NAME
US Capital Investments 21
7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION
SUITE 1, 2301 WASHINGTON AVE
PHILADELPHIA PA, 19146
8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME
Rustin Ohler [HarmanDeutschOhler Architecture]
9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION
1225 N. 7th Street, 267-324-3601
10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map
under the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook.
Also available here: http://metadata.phila.gov/#home/datasetdetails/5543867320583086178c4f34/
STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE
S. 3rd St. Carpenter St. Washington Ave. City Neighborhood
S. Bodine St. Carpenter St. Dead-ends Local / not legally open
S. American St. Carpenter St. Dead-ends Local / not legally open
11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions?
a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO
b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A
c. Street Direction YES NO
d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A
e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction YES NO N/A
boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc.
f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A
APPLICANT: General Project Information
Additional Explanation / Comments:
4
3
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
30COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued)
12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the DEPARTMENTAL
Handbook. APPROVAL
STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH CITY PLAN SIDEWALK
(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) WIDTH 15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance a YES NO YES NO
Required / Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed
pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for
S. 3rd St. 12’ / 12’ / 12’ 12’ / 12’ all pedestrians at all times of the day?
S. Bodine St. (not legally open or on city plans) 5’-9” / 5’-9” / 5’-9” 5’-9” / 5’-9”
S. American St. (not legally open or on city plans) na / na / na na / na APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of the
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component
Handbook, including required widths.
STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE Reviewer Comments:
Required / Existing / Proposed
S. 3rd St. 6’-0” / 12’-0” / 8’-6”
S. Bodine St. 5’-9” / 5’-9” / 5’-9”
S. American St. na / na / na
14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to;
driveways, lay-by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay-by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of the
Handbook.
EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS
INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT
PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS
INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT
5 6
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
31COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)
16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building 21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation YES NO N/A YES NO
Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking the requirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)
property line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section 22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at YES NO N/A YES NO
4.4.1 of the Handbook. intersections?
STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH
Existing / Proposed
S. 3 St.
rd
0’ / 0’
S. Bodine St. 0’ / 0’
S. American St. 0’ / 0’ APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each street DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component
frontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook. Reviewer Comments:
STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH
Recommended / Existing / Proposed
S. 3 St.
rd
3’-6” / 3’-6” / 3’-6”
S. Bodine St. 0’-0” / 0’-0” / 0’-0”
S. American St. 0’-0” / 0’-0” / 0’-0”
18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that are
incorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are the DEPARTMENTAL
following treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan? APPROVAL
Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO
Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO
Benches YES NO N/A YES NO
Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO
Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO
19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO
20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations where YES NO N/A YES NO
the Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in
item 13, or requires an exception
7 8
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
32COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6)
DEPARTMENTAL
23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at APPROVAL
http://phila2035.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf 28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the YES NO YES NO
NA curb?
24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on- and off-street. Bicycle parking requirements are 29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestrian YES NO N/A YES NO
provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14-804. network and destinations?
BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED ON-STREET ON SIDEWALK OFF-STREET 30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian YES NO N/A YES NO
SPACES Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed Existing / Proposed traffic?
1015 S. 3rd St. 23 0/0 0/5 0 / 23 31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness YES NO
of public transit? N/A
APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are
incorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” DEPARTMENTAL DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component
elements identified and dimensioned on the plan? APPROVAL Reviewer Comments:
Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO
Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO
Bicycle-Friendly Street YES NO N/A YES NO
Indego Bicycle Share Station YES NO N/A YES NO
26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, and YES NO N/A YES NO
transit networks?
27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences, YES NO N/A YES NO
work places, and other destinations?
APPLICANT: Bicycle Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component
Reviewer Comments:
10
9
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
33COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8)
DEPARTMENTAL
32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street
APPROVAL
frontage;
STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS DESIGN 40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other active YES NO N/A YES NO
Existing / Proposed SPEED uses facing the street?
/ 41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages YES NO N/A YES NO
pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?
/
42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections YES NO N/A YES NO
/
between transit stops/stations and building access points and
/ destinations within the site?
DEPARTMENTAL
APPLICANT: Urban Design Component
APPROVAL
Additional Explanation / Comments:
33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by NA YES NO
the design?
34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory of YES NO YES NO DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component
historic streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Historical
Commission. Reviewer Comments:
35. Will the public right-of-way be used for loading and unloading YES NO YES NO
activities?
36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO
37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect and YES NO N/A YES NO
extend the street grid?
38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and from YES NO N/A YES NO
destinations as well as within the site?
39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and YES NO YES NO
access of all other roadway users?
APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component
Reviewer Comments:
(1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf
11 12
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
34COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia City Planning Commission
INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question
No. 48. APPLICANT
SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING PROPOSED
CYCLE LENGTH CYCLE LENGTH Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
Additional Reviewer Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian YES NO N/A YES NO
wait time?
45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to YES NO N/A YES NO
cross streets?
46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing YES NO N/A YES NO
streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using
medians or refuge islands to break up long crossings?
If yes, City Plan Action may be required.
47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that YES NO
will be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority”
design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?
Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO
Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO
Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO
Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO
48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all YES NO N/A YES NO
modes at intersections?
49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and YES NO N/A YES NO
promote pedestrian and bicycle safety?
APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component
Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component
Reviewer Comments:
13 14
1015 S. 3RD STREET COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST
-
35You can also read
