Cork County Council East Cork Municipal District - Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route - Cork ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
Cork County Council
East Cork Municipal District
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
Part 8 Manager’s Report
February 2021
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 3
2.0 Planning Context 4
3.0 Project Proposal 6
4.0 Project Description 7
5.0 Part 8 Process 8
5.1 Submissions 8
5.2 Response to submissions 11
5.3 Statutory Consultees 85
5.4 Planner's Report 86
5.5 Modifications to Existing Proposals 94
6.0 Recommendation 95
APPENDIX A: DRAWINGS
APPENDIX B: SITE NOTICE
APPENDIX C NOTIFICATION OF STATUTORY CONSULTEES AND OTHERS
APPENDIX D SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED
APPENDIX E STATUTORY SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Cork County Council (CCC) intends to construct a pedestrian and cycle route (hereafter referred to as
‘cycleway’) 1 which will connect Ballinacurra, Midleton and Water Rock including the residential areas
in Ballinacurra and future residential development in Water Rock with the Town Centre. The scheme
connects Gaelscoil Mhainistir Na Corann with the Town Centre via an off-road greenway. There are
other schools located along the route which can also be integrated into the scheme. The scheme also
connects with Midleton Train Station and the Midleton to Youghal Greenway.
The proposed route is circa 6.0 km in length and passes through the townlands of Ballinacurra, Midleton,
Broomfield West, Knockgriffin, Townparks, Castleredmond, Loughatalia, Garryduff and Oatencake,
Co. Cork.
The purpose of this scheme is to provide safe pedestrian and cycling facilities along the route as well as
facilitating a switch to an alternative and sustainable form of transport for the settlements of Ballinacurra
and Midleton.
Cork County Council commenced this Part 8 Planning Process with the publication of a Press Notice in
the Irish Examiner on 11th November 2020 and the erection of site notices at various locations along the
proposed route. Project proposals were on display in Cork County Councils Area Engineer’s Offices,
Midleton and at Floor 11, County Hall from the commencement date until 9th December 2020.
Statutory consultees were furnished with copies of the relevant documentation, and their views were
sought. Closing date for receipt of submissions was 23rd December 2020.
In total forty-one submissions were received by the closing date including four from statutory
consultees: Inland Fisheries Ireland, Transport Infrastructure Ireland, Office of Public Works and the
National Transport Authority.
All submissions have been considered by Cork County Council and addressed in this report. This report
is the Manager’s Report to the Members of the Council’s East Cork Municipal District Committee for
consideration by the Committee at their meeting on Monday 1st February 2021. It is anticipated that a
decision will be taken by the Committee at this meeting to complete the Part 8 Planning Process.
1
Under Section 68 of the Roads Act a ‘cycleway’ is defined as a public road or proposed public road reserved
for the exclusive use of pedal cyclists or pedal cyclists and pedestrians.
3
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
2.0 PLANNING CONTEXT
The study area is located in Midleton, East Cork, within the administrative area of Cork County Council
in the East Cork Municipal District. Outlined below is the policy framework within which the proposed
cycleway is being progressed.
The National Planning Framework is the Governments high level strategic plan for shaping future
growth and development. The NPF sets out ten National Strategic Outcomes (NSOs) which the
framework aims to deliver. National Strategic Outcome 4 refers to Sustainable Mobility and states that
this scheme will provide a coherent, interconnected and safe cycle network. The cycle network will
cater for all ages and abilities and will allow for a range of cycling activities to occur including
commuting, leisure and tourism. The proposal will improve the livability and quality of life for the local
population and will build on existing infrastructure already in place.
The National Cycling Policy Framework 2009-2020
The Department of Transport published the National Cycling Policy Framework in 2009. The policy
framework emanates from the Governments transport policy for Ireland – Smarter travel – A
Sustainable Transport Future. The Smarter Travel policy sets out a vision for how a sustainable travel
and transport system can be achieved. The strategy provides a framework to incrementally change travel
and transport system in Ireland to a more sustainable pattern.
Cork County Council’s Cork County Development Plan 2014 identifies walking and cycling, and
the provision of walking and cycling infrastructure to be a key component to movement and
accessibility for shorter or some medium length journeys especially in towns and villages. The
development plan enshrines the intentions of Cork County Council in relation to walking and cycling
in objective TM 2-1 Walking and TM 2-2 Cycling which state:
TM 2-1
a) Encourage and facilitate a safe walking route network and a culture of walking where possible
and practical.
b) Preserve, protect and where possible enhance existing walking routes particularly those
providing access to key transport and community infrastructure such as bus stops, rail stations,
schools, shops, workplaces, town and village centres.
c) Ensure that all development should be accessible and permeable on foot and that the walking
experience should be as safe and pleasant as possible and set within an overall coherent
network. The Design Manual for Urban Roads & Streets (DMURS) is a useful guidance tool.
d) Local Area Plans will play an important role in implementing Walking Strategies.
TM 2-2
a) Encourage and facilitate a safe walking and cycling route network and a culture of walking and
particularly cycling in the county, as a viable alternative travel choice. Local Area Plans will
set out Active Travel Strategies (cycling and walking) for individual towns and their hinterland.
b) Improve the streetscape environment for pedestrians and cyclists and those with special
mobility needs while seeking to provide facilities which enhance safety and convenience. The
Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (DMURS) is a useful guidance tool.
c) Ensure that development in urban areas, towns and villages is well located, permeable and
prioritises walking, cycling and access to public transport and other important amenities. The
Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (DMURS) is a useful guidance tool.
d) Promote the development of an integrated and coherent local and countywide cycle network to
form part of the wider National Cycle Network. Routes will be promoted which generally seek
to avoid or minimise impacts on the environment and on EU designated sites.
4
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
The East Cork Municipal District Local Area Plan 2017 refers to Traffic and Transport in the following
ways:
Section 1.7.8 – Chapter 10 of the County Development Plan sets out the Transportation and
Land Use Strategy for the County which seeks to make Cork a more competitive county to
foster sustainable economic and population growth through the delivery of an efficient transport
system and encourage balanced investment in less polluting and more energy efficient modes
of public and private transport, including walking and cycling. This strategy has informed the
preparation of the Local Area Plan.
Section 3.3.47- Facilitating a mode shift to walking and cycling for local journeys within the
town would help ease congestion. New cycle routes have been provided in the newer estates at
Broomfield and around the Northern Relief Road. There is significant potential for cycle routes
in the town given the relatively level terrain and proximity of most residential areas to the
centre. In terms of achieving modal shift in the next plan period, significant weigh must be
given to encouraging increased levels of walking and cycling in the town, mainly though design
in new development areas. The Midleton and Carrigtwohill Transportation Study 2010 outlines
proposals in detail to improve walking and cycling routes throughout the town as well as
parking and public transport measures which will significantly enhance the attractiveness of the
town as a place to live and to visit.
Section 3.3.48 – In 2014 Cork County Council commissioned a cycle network study prepared
for the Cork Metropolitan Area, the objective of this study was to provide a clear plan for the
future development of cycling networks throughout Metropolitan Cork. The main network plan
proposals for Midleton include on main north-south primary route and one primary route
serving the Owenacurra Business Park and the Nordic Business Park area to the north west of
the town. Due to the constrained nature of Midleton Town Centre, the north-south primary route
which will consist of a variety of measures and infrastructure types that respond to the specific
nature of each road section. A number of secondary routes are proposed to serve established
schools, residential areas and employment centres as well as a future Master Plan site to the
south east of the town on the south side of the N25.
It is clear that National Government Policies, the Cork County Development Plan 2014, the East Cork
Electoral Area Local Area Plan 2017 and the Cork Metropolitan Area Cycle Network Plan policy
documents support the Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle scheme.
5
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
3.0 PROJECT PROPOSAL
Cork County Council (CCC) intends to construct a pedestrian and cycle route from Ballinacurra to
Midleton on the R630 and the L3621 Bailick road, on Riverside way along the west side of the
Owenacurra River to the northern relief road linking to Waterock and the Midleton Train station. The
proposed route is circa 6.0km in length and passes through the townlands of Ballinacurra, Midleton,
Broomfield West, Knockgriffin, Townparks, Castleredmond, Loughatalia, Garryduff and Oatencake,
Co. Cork. The proposed cycleway will link to the Midleton Youghal Greenway which is currently being
developed by Cork County Council.
It is proposed to construct approximately 1.5km of segregated cycle facilities, 3.1km of shared
pedestrian and cycle facilities and 2.4km of greenway with ducting and public lighting. Fourteen
pedestrian crossings (Toucan controlled and uncontrolled) are proposed along the route with traffic
calming measures and three bus stop upgrades.
The scheme provides walking and cycling connectivity with Midleton town centre, Midleton train
station, Midleton to Youghal Greenway, primary and secondary schools including Christian Brothers
School, St Mary’s High School, CBS Secondary School, Gaelscoil Mhainistir na Corann,. With
residential developments of Maple Woods, Charlestown, Castleredmond, Riversfield, Castelrock,
Broomfield, Waterrock, etc.
The purpose of this scheme is to comply with national, regional and local policy to improve accessibility
and prioritise walking and cycling as alternative modes of travel. The proposed path would provide a
safe and direct route for commuter, school and leisure trips for the area and in time facilitate extensions
of the route to the east and the west. It is proposed to have public lighting along its full length.
Benefits of this proposal:
A safe and direct route for commuters, school goers and leisure enthusiasts.
Enhanced connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists.
Provide an environment which will encourage modal shift to sustainable forms of transport.
Improve quality of life for residents of the area.
Expand the overall cycle network.
Facilitate a reduction in traffic volumes on the road network.
Note: If this development proposal successfully achieves Part 8 Planning Approval, land
acquisition, either by agreement or Compulsory Purchase Order, will be necessary to enable the
project to proceed as intended.
6
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The scheme includes:
Construction of approx. 1.5km of segregated cycle facilities.
Construction of 3.1km of shared pedestrian and cycle facilities.
Construction of 2.4km of greenway standard pedestrian and cycle facilities.
Continuous pedestrian/cycle facility across minor accesses with ramped facility provided across
more substantial accesses and junctions.
Three bus stop upgrades.
Provision of ducting and LED public lighting along the length of the path.
Traffic calming gateways in accordance with the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport,
together with the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government
approved Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets (DMURS).
Landscaping, planting and potential for a wildflower corridor.
Improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity to Midleton Town Centre, Midleton Train Station,
Midleton to Youghal Greenway, residential developments of Maple Woods, Ballinacurra,
Castleredmond, Charlestown, The Cotswolds, Riverside, Riversfield, Castle Rock, Millbrook,
Broomfield and Waterock.
Improved pedestrian and cycle connectivity to primary and secondary schools including
Christian Brothers Primary school, St Mary’s High. CBS Secondary, Gaelscoil Mhainistir na
Corann and local businesses and services with existing and new residential areas.
7
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
5.0 PART 8 PROCESS
5.1 Submissions
The following tables list the individuals and organisations that made observations or submissions before
the deadline date. Also listed are the Statutory Consultees notified of the project and other agencies
impacted by the scheme.
Individuals and Organisations
NUMBER NAME DATE RECEIVED REFERENCE NO.
1. Joe O’Leary 11/11/2020 LAC271865846
2. David Teixeira-Lynch 16/11/2020 LAC272945788
3. Paul Fellows 16/11/2020 LAC272970358
4. Midleton Athletic Club 17/11/2020 LAC273380003
5. Sharon Gleeson 18/11/2020 LAC274320196
6. Miah McGrath 19/11/2020 LAC274280080
7. Patrick Clarke 19/11/2020 LAC274392590
8. Midleton Medical Centre 19/11/2020 LAC274596158
9. Gerard O’Brien 21/11/2020 LAC275043206
10. Elma Wade 22/11/2020 LAC278873443
11. Luke Cranitch 25/11/2020 LAC278875622
Patrick and Elizabeth O
12. 25/11/2020 LAC293304013
Hanlon
Michael McPartland, Inland
13. 01/12/2020 LAC278879662
Fisheries Ireland
Michael Kelleher, O’Flynn
14. 02/12/2020 LAC279115571
Group
8
Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
15. Jan Hayes 05/12/2020 LAC280522924
16. Gerard Hennessey 09/12/2020 LAC282326196
17. Martin O’Farrell 09/12/2020 LAC282331729
Transport Infrastructure
18. 10/12/2020 LAC282328915
Ireland
Midleton Flood Relief
19. 10/12/2020 LAC282485423
Scheme
Rhodri Mears, Midleton
20. 15/12/2020 LAC284335908
Educate Together School
21. Office of Public Works 16/12/2020 LAC285503779
John Crean, Castleredmond
22. 17/12/2020 LAC285076488
Residents Association
23. Pat & Eithne Kerr 18/12/2020 LAC286251836
24. AIB Bank 21/12/2020 LAC286290302
25. David Harpur 21/12/2020 LAC286463491
26. National Transport Authority 21/12/2020 LAC286465685
Robert Allen, Cois na
27. hAbhann Administration 21/12/2020 LAC287089171
CLG
Gaelscoil Mhainistir na
28. 22/12/2020 LAC286649039
Corann
29. Michael Carroll 22/12/2020 LAC286951683
30. Liam McCarthy 22/12/2020 LAC287090513
31. Kaivalya Properties Ltd 22/12/2020 LAC287091691
32. James O’Connor 22/12/2020 LAC287069480
9Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
33. Cork Cycling Campaign 23/12/2020 LAC287213443
Clara O’Neill, Cork Co-op
34. 23/12/2020 LAC287221559
Marts
35. Cllr. Alan O’Connor 23/12/2020 LAC287234510
36. Cllr. Liam Quaide 22/12/2020 LAC287238746
37. Conn Donovan 23/12/2020 LAC287190152
38. Eoin Ahern 23/12/2020 LAC291094592
39. Gavin Sheridan 23/12/2020 LAC287210281
40. Transport Mobility Forum 23/12/2020 LAC291041175
41. Brian Murphy 23/12/2020 LAC287313392
Statutory Consultees
NUMBER NAME DATE ADDRESS
RECEIVED
National Parks and W.S c/o
Department of Environment, Muckross House, Killarney National Park, Killarney,
1 None
Heritage and Local Co. Kerry
Government
2 The Heritage Council None Church Lane, Kilkenny
3 An Taisce None Tailor's Hall, Back Lane, Dublin 8
Development Applications Unit, Department of Arts,
4 National Monuments None
Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Newtown Road, Wexford
5 The Arts Council None 70, Merrion Square, Dublin 2
6 Fáilte Ireland None Paddy Matthews, Manager of Environment and
Planning, 88-95 Amiens Street, Dublin 1
Planning Notification, Irish Water HQ Offices, Colvill
7 Irish Water None
House, 24-26 Talbot Street, Dublin 1
10Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
Inland Fisheries Ireland - South
8 01/12/2020 Sunnyside House, Masseytown, Macroom, Co. Cork
West Region
9 National Transport Authority 21/12/2020 Harcourt Lane, Dublin 2
10 Transport Infrastructure Ireland 10/12/2020 Parkgate Street, Dublin 8
11 OPW 16/12/2020 Jonathon Swift Street, Trim, Co. Meath
12 Mona Hallinan None Heritage Unit, County Hall, Cork
13 Mary Sleeman None Co Archaeologist, Floor 3, County Hall
Other Agencies Consulted
NUMBER NAME DATE RECEIVED ADDRESS
1 An Garda Síochána None Midleton Garda Station, Cork
11Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
5.2: Response to submissions
Item NAME Matters raised Response
1
1. It is almost impossible to exit the estate 1. The signalisation of the Dark Road and
by car turning towards Midleton direction the provision of a yellow box on the
at peak times. northbound carriageway opposite the
I welcome the broad principle of entrance to Castleredmond, included in
cycleways & walkways but narrowing the the modifications section of this report,
Castleredmond exit will cause further will provide a break in traffic to facilitate
delays trying to get out of the estate, cars turning towards Midleton.
especially in the mornings. Furthermore, the traffic calming
proposals of a narrowed carriageway and
gateways on the R630 are designed to
slow traffic thus assisting right-turning
vehicles when exiting Castleredmond.
The detailed design of the scheme will
2. At the moment at least if you’re turning accommodate the left turn movement
left towards Whitegate you can edge out exiting Castleredmond estate, if feasible,
after the pillars, but it looks like the subject to recommendations of the Road
proposal is to plant grass there! Safety Audit. This will be included in the
Modifications section of the Manager’s
Joe O’Leary Report.
3. Also the lane for turning right into the 2. The detailed design of the scheme will
estate coming from the Whitegate endeavour to accommodate the left-
direction is to be removed! turning movement when exiting
Castleredmond estate if feasible. This
will be included in the Modifications
section of the Manager’s Report.
3. The proposed road layout and signalised
junction of the Dark Road, with the
associated measures as referenced in 1,
above, will make this right turn into the
estate easier. The right turn from the
Castleredmond will be safer due to the
removal of the inbound right turning lane.
Its removal will reduce through traffic
speeds, result in a shorter right turn for
outbound traffic, and could facilitate
clearway road marking (yellow box) for
northbound traffic.
2
David 1. While this is mostly welcome, my main 1. The scheme is designed to provide safe
Teixeira- concern is SHT-307 junction and most pedestrian and cycling facilities in
other junctions where pedestrians and Midleton for commuters, school goers
Lynch cyclists are forced to wait and have and leisure enthusiasts. Controlled
ending paths instead of priority over crossings provide a protected crossing
motor vehicles. option for vulnerable users. This is
12Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
As for SHT-307 junction- this has three considered to be most appropriate form of
lanes splitting from one single traffic lane crossing to reduce potential conflicts with
to accommodate two filter lanes on both motorists.
the East and West side of the designs.
The proposed cycle lanes simply end and
then become conflict points as
pedestrians and cyclists are then forced to
share the same surface.
This junction is ideal for the introduction
of a “Dutch-style” junction that keeps
pedestrians and cyclists separate. This
reduces chances of conflicts and keeps
cyclists out of the way and not forcing a
stop/start at junctions unless pedestrians
are crossing.
The below would be a fantastic attraction
as it would become one of the first of its
kind in the country and also improve the
safety and traffic-flow of the junction
majorly. Filter lanes provide little in the
way of reducing traffic and instead are
just another area to create traffic instead
of singular or double lanes with left or
right turns as appropriate with the correct
traffic light management.
Junction treatment needs to be strongly
reconsidered in these plans as nearly all
create unnecessary or dangerous conflict.
2. Shared paths should be avoided and given 2. Where there is space available, such as
the width of vehicle lanes in many of the along the R630 the design team have
plans there is no reason why a single included for separating the pedestrians
directional cycle lane can’t be added. and the cyclists. However, providing
Narrower motor lanes also reduce speeds dedicated infrastructure for all road users
as the perceived width reduces drivers in an existing built-up location like
desire to drive faster. Where shared paths Midleton is extremely difficult due to
are “essential” there needs to be the space restrictions. The matter of the
correct surface to prevent slipping of shared use path is dealt with in greater
pedestrians or cyclists. Shared path logos detail in response no. 3 below.
on the ground will also be essential to A one-way system is proposed on a
prevent chances of conflict that “cyclists section of the Bailick road by re-
shouldn’t be on the footpath” so that allocating existing road space to
residents and others can be aware it is pedestrians and cyclists.
shared. Signage and road markings will be
Junctions should have priority lights for provided for the shared use of facilities,
cyclists where there is no dedicated cycle as required.
lane so that they can move ahead of traffic
and prevent issues such as close passing.
3. Overall, the plans are mostly positive but 3. The National Cycle Manual (2011)
as already mentioned each junction still provides guidance on how the ‘cycling
caters for motor vehicles by primary over offer’ can be improved to encourage more
both pedestrians and cyclists which people to cycle. The Manual provides a
should no longer be the case as per the strong focus on urban built-up areas while
also recognising that:
13Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
NTA handbook and guidelines. The ‘shared facilities might be appropriate at
population of Midleton is small enough locations where footpaths are wide and
that the majority of journeys within the the volume of pedestrians and cyclists is
town limits should be walked or cycled low, e.g., in low-density towns and cities,
where possible. If junctions make these and suburban or recreational areas’
journeys difficult then it will simply (p.23).
discourage this and people will continue A shared path is appropriate for this
to drive. I look forward to visiting and scheme given its location in a
both cycling and walking the new suburban/rural and low-density
improvements in the near future and hope environment. In ‘Give Cycling a Push,
the priority of pedestrians and cyclists is Implementation Fact Sheet 1,’which is
taken strongly under consideration. published by the EU, a shared path is the
recommended design solution at densities
lower than 100 pedestrians/cyclists (per
metre width of path, per hour), and full
segregation is recommended above 200.
This scheme will be between three and
four metres wide (in line with National
Cycle Manual guidance that shared paths
be a minimum of three metres wide),
indicating a threshold of between 600 and
800 users per hour before segregation
becomes the recommended design.
Surveys of the existing route indicate the
typical highest volume of pedestrians and
cyclists is less than 30 per hour. This
indicates the scheme will support a
significant increase in walking and
cycling and the proposed shared use
nature is appropriate. The National
Transport Authority (NTA) is the funding
body for this scheme. The NTA are
implementing the Department of
Transport, Tourism and Sport’s Smarter
Travel Policy.
3
1. I have made comments below in relation 1. The proposals include for an upgraded
to the proposed Pedestrian and Cycle junction of the Bailick Road and the Dark
Route from Ballinacurra to Midleton. My road with tighter kerb radii which will
comments relate primarily to the reduce vehicular speeds and provide for a
proposals for the Bailick Road. In safer environment.
general, I strongly welcome the With reference to DMURS, the proposed
proposals. I have written to councillors in measures will have a positive effect on
Paul Fellows the past drawing their attention to the vehicle speeds and classification by
danger of the current road layout and the providing a more urbanised environment.
particular potential for serious injury or This will be achieved by passive
death due to the road layout close to the measures such as more restrictive
junction of Bailick Road with Dark Road. geometry for cars and heavy vehicles,
In doing so I wished to ensure that this landscaping measures, and increased
danger was on the public record. pedestrian and cyclist activity. It is
My specific comments are: envisaged that the introduction of the
2. The Bailick Road has increasingly shuttle system on Bailick Road will also
become a "rat run" used to avoid the result in reduced through traffic along the
Lakeview roundabout by a large volume route, with diversions to the R630, as
14Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
of traffic in peak periods. During these appropriate. The proposed measures will
periods it has become increasingly result in reduced vehicle speed, and
difficult and dangerous for pedestrians to consequent increased safety.
cross from the west side of the road to the
east side to be able to walk under the
underpass. 2. The scheme has been designed to provide
The east side of the road north of the continuous pedestrian and cycle
underpass and up to St Mary's Road is connectivity along Bailick Road and in
subject to large amounts of water ponding doing so will provide much improved
after even moderate rainfall. There is no infrastructure for vulnerable road users.
indication in the plan of how this may be The design takes account of the
addressed. characteristics of Bailick Road and the
The only way to avoid potentially being location of, and connection to, significant
drenched by passing motorists at present residential areas and schools along the
is to cross over to the west side footpath western side of the road.
immediately after reaching the north side
of the underpass i.e. the "Feathers" side. The detailed design of the drainage
In peak periods this is difficult and infrastructure will consider the matter of
potentially dangerous. Looking at the surface water ponding.
plans the footpath through the underpass
has been retained on the east side which
maintains the problem in 2 above.
May I suggest that the footpath through
the underpass be sited on the west side of
the road. This would have the double
advantage of linking the increasingly
popular "Feathers" park to the car park to
the south of the underpass and would
provide a safer way around the seemingly
insoluble problem of water ponding on
the east side of the road to the north of the
underpass. Many visitors to the
"Feathers" use the car park because of the
lack of parking alongside the park itself.
This would be a very safe solution.
If the proposal above were to be adopted
it would also be possible to maintain or
improve the existing footpath as far as the
entrance to Cois na hAbhann which
would avoid the need and expenses for a
new security-controlled pedestrian entry
gate to the complex.
3. The proposal for pedestrian access from 3. The design and construction of any
the car park into the Cois na hAbhainn pedestrian connection between the
complex cause problems for wheelchairs, complex and the car park will be
mobility devices and prams due to both consistent with Building Regulations and
differences in levels between the car park thus wheelchair compliant.
and the complex and also the lack of
access onto the hard standing within the The detailed design will be subject to
complex if the car park is full. This makes Quality Audit, with reference to DMURS
it impractical above would also address (2019), including an independent Road
the increased dangers created in the Safety Audit and Accessibility Audit,
15Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
current proposals of exiting the Cois na ensuring that the scheme is provdies
hAbhainn complex. access for all, as appropriate.
4. Because of sight lines exiting the
complex by vehicle is already very 4. The detailed design will be subject to a
dangerous. Bringing passing traffic closer Road Safety Audit which will assess,
in towards the complex will increase the among other things, sight lines. Any
dangers and chances of collisions. I matters arising from same will be
should like to put this on the record. resolved as part of the design process.
If it is decided to retain this increased
danger by eliminating the footpath on the Safe access will not be compromised by
west side by the complex, an alternative the proposed scheme. The detailed design
to the pedestrian entry is to install a safe will be subject to a Quality Audit,
crossing from the footpath opposite the including an independent Road Safety
main gates of Cois na hAbhann to access Audit and Accessibility Audit.
the complex. This will not deal with the
increased danger of exiting the car park
but would address the pedestrian access
issues.
5. The direction of one-way traffic flow 5. This proposal is necessary to provide
from Ballinacurra to the Dark Road is much improved infrastructure for
northbound. May I note that this will pedestrians and cyclists on the Bailick
maintain the "rat run" along the Bailick Road between Ballinacurra and the Dark
Road in the morning peak when it is Road. It is envisaged that the proposed
particularly concentrated and heavy. scheme will reduce unnecessary through
traffic from the area due to urbanisation,
6. It also funnels more traffic up the Dark passive speed reduction, and the shuttle
Road to a very difficult and dangerous system at the underpass.
exit onto the main road.
The redirection of traffic from the Bailick
Road up the Dark Road will, together 6. It is proposed to signalise the junction of
with the increasing number of residences the Dark Road and the R630 making it a
appearing in the area plus likely future safer junction for all road users.
residential growth along the Bailick
Road, make the exit from the Dark Road It is envisaged that the scheme will reduce
onto the main road increasingly difficult unnecessary through traffic from the area
and dangerous. due to urbanisation, passive speed
This exit requires vehicular traffic lights reduction and increased pedestrian and
not just Toucan crossings to address road cycle use.
safety issues. Otherwise, it will become a
traffic bottleneck at peak times.
7. The inclusion in the plan of vehicular 7. Noted.
traffic lights to control the flow through The construction of wider paths and
the underpass in the Bailick Road is narrower carriageway will assist in traffic
welcome. Similarly addressing the traffic calming. Controlled and uncontrolled
problems at the top of the Dark Road pedestrian crossings will also help in this
would be welcome. regard. The detailed design of the scheme
From the documents it was difficult to will also look at additional measures such
ascertain how the traffic calming as enhanced signage.
measures would slow traffic on the
Bailick Road.
16Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
8. Given that the goal of the plan is to 8. The changing of speed limits on public
increase both cycle and pedestrian use of roads is a reserved function of the Elected
the road should a speed limit of 30 or 40 Members of Cork County Council and is
km/h be introduced on this road? subject to review on a statutory basis
every five years. Speed limits are due for
review in 2021 (commencing) with
revisions to be adopted in 2022. Thus,
the process is independent of this Part 8.
With reference to the Department of
9. At the north end of the Bailick Road a Transport Tourism and Sports’ design
new pedestrian bridge is to be installed Manual for Urban Roads and Streets 2019
over the stream. Whilst this is welcome (DMURS), the proposed measures will
has any consideration being given to have a positive effect on actual vehicle
linking the Bailick Road to Midleton speeds by providing a more urbanised
Main Street with a pedestrian/cycle path environment. This will be achieved by
along the stream to turn the current passive measures such as more restrictive
"wilderness" into a pleasant riverside geometry for cars and heavy vehicles,
path? landscaping measures, and increased
pedestrian and cyclist activity. It is
10. Proposals for the Coolbawn remove envisaged that the introduction of the
vehicle parking from the north Side of the shuttle system on Bailick Road will also
street which is the commercial side and result in reduced through-traffic along the
significantly reduce the amount of route, with diversions to the R630, as
parking on the south side. What appropriate. The proposed measures will
consideration has been given to the result in reduced vehicle speed, and
commercial impact of doing this? consequent increased safety.
As stated at the beginning I personally
welcome the broad thrust of these plans 9. Consideration has been given to
and hope that some of my detailed secondary connectivity in the design of
comments may be of assistance and given this scheme including the connection
positive consideration. referenced. The design of the scheme
thus allows for such future interventions.
10. The scheme is designed to provide high
11. Further to that submission I am including quality pedestrian and cycle connectivity
further comments relating to a very from residential areas, to the north and
significant increase in danger of traffic south of Midleton, into the commercial
accidents, injury and potential fatalities heart of the town. It will also provide a
resulting from the severe reduction in connection between the terminus of the
sight lines exiting Cois na hAbhann (18 Midleton-Youghal Greenway and the
apartments) caused by the proposed Main St., in doing so further promoting
changes to the road layout and the commercial activity.
removal of the south footpath from Parking is being maintained on the
outside The Moorings and Cois na southern side of Coolbawn. However, to
hAbhann. provide a high-quality connection with
Given this increase in danger would you the Main St. the removal of parking on the
please confirm that the Traffic and northern side of the road is necessitated.
Transport Division have checked the
relevant sight lines in situ not just on 11. The detailed design with be subject to a
paper. Do the actual sight lines that would Road Safety Audit which will assess,
exist under the proposal conform to road among other things, sight lines. Any
safety sight line standards? matters arising from same will be
resolved as part of the design process.
17Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
Would you also please confirm that if the Safe access will not be compromised by
proposed road layout and reduction in the proposed scheme. The detailed design
sight lines is found to be the contributory will be subject to a Quality Audit,
cause of future property damage, injury including an independent Road Safety
and death that the Traffic and Transport Audit and Accessibility Audit.
Division accepts responsibility for the
consequences of your revised road layout
and that Cork County Council will
indemnify both residents and road users
against such accidents caused by the
dangerous diminution of sight lines.
To illustrate the issue, I am attaching two
photographs taken from the driver’s seat
of my Volkswagen Passat looking South
along Bailick Road. The first shows
current sight lines. The second shows
sight lines if the pathways are removed
and the roadway brought closer to the
property.
4
1. We are delighted to see such initiatives as 1. Positive submission is noted
this one and, indeed, the Midleton-
Youghal Greenway being implemented in
Midleton an area that continues to see a huge
Athletic Club increase in population. We hope to see,
and be part of, other such exciting outdoor
amenity developments, such as a running
track, in the future and we wholeheartedly
give our support to this initiative.
5
1. I just wanted to submit an observation for 1. The scheme is designed to provide high
the proposed cycle path on Broderick quality pedestrian and cycle connectivity
Street in Midleton. As an avid cyclist I from residential areas, to the north and
love the plans to improve cycle paths, but south of Midleton, into the commercial
this path would mean there is no on street heart of the town. It will also provide a
Sharon parking for customers who want to shop connection between the terminus of the
in The Grumpy Bakers, Well and Good, Midleton-Youghal Greenway and the
Gleeson The Gingerbread House, Bailick Blinds, Main St., in doing so further promoting
Farmgate, The Brow Bar and more commercial activity.
commercial units on the street. We have a Parking is being maintained on the
small car park in Coolbawn but our car southern side of Coolbawn. However, to
park here is always full as it is. We see provide a high-quality connection with
this cycle path creating a big parking the Main St. the removal of parking on the
issue for locals here in Midleton. northern side of the road is necessitated.
6
Miah McGrath 1. As a property owner on the proposed 1. Positive submission is noted
cycleway I fully support the proposal and
think it will be a very positive addition to
Midleton. Great idea to link up the
18Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
proposed residential development in
Waterock and the Greenway to the town
centre and schools.
7
1. I am a resident of Bailick Avenue. My 1. Noted
congratulations to Cork County Council
on the proposed works to be carried out re
the Cycleway scheme in our area. The
cycleway amenity will enhance our area
greatly!!
The provision of traffic lights that
accompany the plan will also increase
road safety in our area, which has become
a genuine concern to residents as the
traffic on Bailick Road has increased
exponentially in recent years!
2. The main concern I wish to highlight at 2. New fencing has recently been erected here
Patrick Clarke this time is the condition of the water by Cork County Council in conjunction
treatment plant adjacent to the entrance of with Irish Water which we believe enhances
Bailick Avenue. It would in my opinion the visual nature of the area. An element of
be remiss of Cork County Council to screen planting can be introduced to
embark on a project which is to provide accompany the detailed design proposals.
not just a leisure amenity but one of
aesthetic value. The existing plant, gantry
etc needs to be incorporated into the plan
to ensure that this necessary facility is not
left as is. The funds necessary to shield
this eyesore from public view would be
minuscule in a project with such a large
budget.
The residents of Bailick Avenue are faced
with this each and every day.
8
1. Many thanks for your email and 1. Positive submission is noted.
information contained therein.
The practice staff viewed the very
impressive virtual tour and would simply
Midleton like to advise that we, as a group of local
Medical doctors, nurses and allied health
practitioners, heartily endorse your
Centre planned intervention.
This project can only benefit the health of
the entire community and we wish you all
the best in your endeavours.
Please do not hesitate to contact me for
any further feedback/clarification.
9
Gerard 1. I note from the site notice documentation 1. Footpath can be extended to serve the last
O’Brien of the Ballinacurra to Midleton cycle dwelling on that site. This will be
lane, the starting point of the proposed included as a modification in the
route (point 1). I would ask that you Manager’s Report.
19Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
would consider moving/extending the
starting point (cycle lane & footpath or
footpath only) as shown in the extract
from the plan (attached) & highlighted in
green - to our entrance gate.
2. I have also highlighted the main entrance 2. Rose lawn estate can gain access to the
to the Rose Lawn housing estate proposed new infrastructure on the
immediately opposite my gate (and eastern side of the R630 by going through
highlighted in yellow) which would also the relatively quiet estates. If the demand
benefit greatly from this extension. is there in the future for more formal
Currently, we can only leave our home by connections this can be looked at.
car due to the lack of a footpath of any
kind outside of our entrance gate, the
main road has become extremely busy
and very dangerous in recent years and is
not safe to cross on foot.
3. We would also suggest that the speed limit 3. The amendment of speed limits on public
be reduced/the 50km zone extended to at roads is a reserved function of the Elected
least the entrance to the Ballinacurra Members of Cork County Council and is
Business Park as part of this overall plan. subject to review on a statutory basis
every five years. Speed limits are due for
review in 2021 (commencing) with
revisions to be adopted in 2022. Thus,
the process is independent of this Part 8.
10
1. While this is an exciting project, I would 1. Where there is space available, such as
observe that a mix of pedestrian and cycle along the R630 the design team have
traffic is restrictive to both. Would it be included for separating the pedestrians
possible if there were separate lanes for and the cyclists. However, providing
Elma Wade both? dedicated infrastructure for all road users
in an existing built-up location like
Midleton is extremely difficult due to
space restrictions. The matter of the
shared use path is dealt with in greater
detail under submission no. 3 above.
11
1. I believe there is a cycle lane being 1. The design team is working closely with
planned near the apartment block which I the Midleton Flood Relief project team in
understand will get rid of the footpath relation to sections common to both
near the boundary wall, put a new gate schemes.
access point in the public car park and
Luke Cranitch change the boundary wall. While I agree
with cycle lanes, I am not very keen on
the changes being made. Firstly, if a path
is taken away, the works that will be
needed might affect the flood defences of
the area. We have never had flooding
issues in the apartment car park and don’t
want that to happen.
20Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
2. Secondly, I’m not comfortable with a gate 2. The revised pedestrian access will be by
being installed for access from a public way of security gate with access restricted
car park to the apartment block. Having to residents of the apartment block only,
access points at the apartment block gate in keeping with existing arrangements.
area is more secure.
3. Thirdly, removing the footpath, puts 3. Pedestrian and cycle access to and egress
residents in danger as they will be coming from the apartment block will be via the
out straight on to a very busy road. At new access point provided under this
least with a path, parents can ensure that scheme.
children, don’t have to cross the road to a
different path. A child on seeing there is
no path near them might run across the
road without looking and that could have
tragic consequences.
4. Finally, the landscaping/herb garden 4. Noted. The detailed design will
should not be affected in any way if a new endeavour to minimise and mitigate any
wall is built or changed in any way. The potential impact on the landscaping/herb
aesthetics of the apartment complex are garden.
very attractive to any potential renters or
owners.
Again, I have no issue with cycle lanes,
but some kind of compromise should be
made where everyone can be satisfied.
12
We refer to the above proposed
development and as an affected party given
that our property immediately adjoins the
L3631 (Bailick Road) we wish to make the
following observations
Flooding of Bailick Road
The County Council will be well aware of
the regular occurrence of flooding on the
Bailick Road, the latest such event
occurring on the morning of the 20th-
Patrick and October last. I set out hereunder in
Appendix 1 some imagery taken from our
Elizabeth O property on that day for the County
Hanlon Council’s attention.
It is very apparent, in our opinion, that the
priority for residents and road users in the
area is for the flood relief works to be
undertaken prior to the implementation of
any re-surfacing and realignment works and
to carry out the development now proposed
appears to be premature and problematic to
us and others for the following reasons.
1. The flood barrier wall required to be 1. The design team will continue to liaise
erected (c1.20m above the existing road closely with the Midleton Flood Relief
level) for the entire southern section of project team to ensure a co-ordinated
the Bailick Road will, we believe, require approach to the successful delivery of both
projects.
21Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
extensive stone wall and quay wall A 3.5 metres wide carriageway is adequate
removal and upgrading works to be for all likely vehicles. Swept path analysis
undertaken. will be carried out during the detailed
The construction of the flood barrier wall design stage to confirm the alignment.
will, we anticipate, require the deduction
in width of the carriageway and sufficient
road width will be required to be
maintained to ensure that the roadway can
be kept in operations so that residents can
get in and out of their homes in the normal
way.
The construction of the proposed 3.0m
wide cycle pathway along the southern
length of the Bailick Road, together with
the reduction in width of the existing
carriageway to a 3.5m one way lane will
surely result in the Bailick Road being
insufficiently wide to accommodate the
required construction traffic to carry out
the essential flood relief works whilst at
the same time maintaining it in full use for
the residents reliant on it on a daily basis
to access their homes.
2. Concurrent with the flood barrier wall 2. The design team will continue to liaise
development works will be a requirement closely with the Midleton Flood Relief
to upgrade the existing roadway/roadside project team to ensure a co-ordinated
drainage which is currently non-existent approach to the successful delivery of both
with the exception of a few holes and projects. The detailed design of the scheme
openings in the quay wall which currently will address issues such as surface water
only exacerbates the flooding of the drainage of the carriageway and the
roadway during high tide events. These proposed shared use path.
works will undoubtedly require the laying
of new drainage pipes and drains across
and along the Bailick Road to be
connected to existing surface water drains
and/or discharged to the harbour via non-
return valves to be installed beneath the
proposed new cycle/pathway as each
situation dictates. If the works new
proposed are implemented prior to the
flood relief measures being carried out it
is inevitable that further major
interference with the day to day use of this
section of Bailick road will result.
The supporting documentation prepared
by Aecom affords a simple paragraph to
flooding in the area and both it and the
area planners reports merely state the
following ‘a flood protection scheme for
Midleton is currently in the planning
process. The design team have been in
contact with the flood protection design
team to ensure that the two projects
22Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
integrate with one another’ (extract from
Aecom Midleton Cycle Scheme –
Preliminary Design Report) ‘a flood
defence scheme for the town is currently
being prepared and the documents
submitted indicate that the proposed cycle
network integrate with this scheme’
(extract from Planners Report dated 4th
and 6th November 2020)
This apparent lack of real assessment of
the impact of the proposed development
on the critical flood relief works gives us
no confidence that the proposal was
appropriately considered. It is clearly
evident that major difficulties will arise
for us during and post construction should
this proposal be implemented as currently
prior to the flood relief works being
undertaken.
Access
3. Currently we enjoy uninterrupted access 3. The provision of dedicated cycle and
and egress from our dwelling in an pedestrian facilities along this section of
easterly and westerly direction given that Bailick Road necessitates the introduction
the existing roadway is, and, has always of a one-way system.
been two-way. The design team will continue to liaise
The current proposal will reduce access to closely with the Midleton Flood Relief
our home considerably and will result in project team to ensure a co-ordinated
those of us in the household who require approach to the successful delivery of both
to reach the N25 having to do so in a projects.
westerly direction via the Bailick Road With regards to the specific location
and the Dark Road and on to the R630 and referenced, and the recurrence of flooding
onwards to the N25. there-in the project team, through our
Currently at peak hours during normal engagements with both the Area Engineer’s
weather and tide conditions it is almost Office and the Flood Relief Scheme, is
impossible for us to exit our dwelling in a aware of same. The detailed design of the
westerly direction due to the sheer pedestrian and cycle path and the project
volume of school traffic diverting off the implementation programme will reflect
R630 to get to the main schools in the same.
town.
During a high tide flood event the Bailick
Road is impassable between the
Charlestown Maltings Apartment
Development and the Charlestown Wharf
Apartment Development where the
roadway is proposed to be reduced in
width to a single westerly direction
carriageway
If the proposal is implemented prior to the
flood relief works being completed we
would be unable to leave our home for the
entirety of what is now becoming a much
more regular flood occurrence
completely blocking the roadway.
23Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
Furthermore, in the event of a medical
emergency we would not be able to get
onto a main road without having to drive
up the one-way carriageway the wrong
way
Submitted Documentation
4. We have carefully reviewed the 4. The general arrangement cross section
documentation which outlined the drawing shows the propose 3.5m
development proposal and note the carriageway and minimum 3m shared path.
following errors/omissions therein It is not intended to construct a footpath on
adjacent to our property. the non-river side of the road. The wall on
Section C-C on the general arrangement the northern side of the section is a drawing
drawing no SHT-201 suggest that the error.
proposed single lane carriageway of 3.5m Where trees can be retained along the entire
will directly abut the front boundary wall route every effort will be made to preserve
of our dwelling as shown in the extract them. A planting scheme will accompany
hereunder. the detailed proposals to replace and add to
The existing roadway is however 8.10m any trees that are lost as a result of
wide in this location and accordingly the construction.
section is not representative of the on-the- The design team will continue to liaise
ground situation given that a width of closely with the Midleton Flood Relief
over 1.60m is unaccounted for in this project team to ensure a co-ordinated
Section C-C. approach to the successful delivery of both
The same general arrangement drawing projects.
(SHT-201) outlines the proposed shared
use path and carriageway on plan format
in front of our dwelling, however an area
coloured in light grey is shown thereon
but unannotated (see extract below) and
accordingly we are unsure of what the
County Council’s proposals are for this
area and require confirmation given that
this area immediately adjoins our
property. Is this intended to be a footpath?
And if so, what are the proposals for the
existing ESB pole together with utility
access chambers and associated ducting
serving our property situated therein?
This drawing also shows 5no trees
(coloured in green) which are to be
retained as part of the proposed
development works. We fail to see,
however, how the removal of these trees,
which will be required to facilitate the
flood relief wall erection, will not
seriously damage the proposed shared use
path as proposed given that the entirely of
their root structures are contained within
the ground directly beneath the proposed
new shared path area. Inevitably serious
damage will result to the pathway to
remove these trees during the flood relief
works resulting in costly reinstatement
24Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
works which will add to the currently
mounting costs of the Flood Relief
Scheme most likely pushing it further off
into the distance.
Permitted development in the study area 5. The Charlestown planning condition
5. Section 1.3.2 of the Aecom Preliminary referenced predates this Part 8 process.
Design Report as outlined hereunder Thus, the design of the junction requires
makes specific reference to a recent grant modification to take cognisance of
of planning permission by Cork County proposed pedestrian and cycle route.
Council for a residential development of Traffic calming measures, and other
87 dwellings on the grounds of planning conditions, specific to the
‘Charlestown’, accessed from the Dark Charlestown planning application, other
Road (PA Reg. Ref No 185691) which is than where they are modified by this Part
currently under construction. ‘planning 8 are still a requirement of planning.
permission has recently been granted for A Modification in the Manager’s Report
an 87 unit residential development on a of this scheme will be included to clarify
Greenfield site between the R630 and the the raised nature of the junction.
L3621 within the study area of the
cycleway scheme. Integration and
connectivity between the schemes will be
examined as part of this report’.
This permission included extensive
traffic calming measures to be
implemented at the junction of the Bailick
Road with the Dark Road, including the
provision of raised tables together with
associated road improvement works at the
junction of the Dark Road with the R630
as shown in Appendix 3 below.
These road improvement works form part
of the grant of planning permission
associated with this planning permission
and were specifically required to ensure
that the safety concerns of it’s adjoining
residents and those in the greater Bailick
Road area were taken into account. The
Aecom Report notes that the integration
of this permitted scheme (i.e. the housing
and associated road improvement works)
will be examined as part of their report
however any such references to same in
their report for the Charlestown
development have eluded us.
It is very unclear to us how the permitted
housing development at Charlestown can
be compliant with its planning permission
if the aforementioned traffic calming
measures permitted therein are not
undertaken. We would expect that to omit
these significant elements from the
overall permission would constitute a
material variation and accordingly
25Ballinacurra to Midleton Pedestrian and Cycle Route
require a variation of their planning
permission.
Clarification of this issue is sought as this
development affects the northern
boundary of our dwelling witch the
developers have a planning obligation to
erect. We do not want a situation to arise
which would delay the erection of the
permitted fencing and accordingly
clarification is required.
As our submission clearly shows there are
very serious issues arising for us should
the development proposal as currently
presented be realised at this time.
Each of the valid concerns raised by us
above need to be appropriately and
satisfactorily addressed and any
ambiguous detailed clarified to our
satisfaction prior to this development
undergoing any further consideration.
We fully believe, however, that the
proposed development works are
premature and should only realistically be
undertaken when the Flood Relief works
have been fully completed. Only then will
all underground drainage upgrade works
and required protective barrier walls be
completed to a level where surface
dressings and the addition of cycle lanes
and upgraded footpaths should be
undertaken.
It wholly appears to us that this is a case
of the ‘cart before the horse’ as it is
inevitable that these proposed works will
be seriously damaged when the
desperately needed Flood Relief Works
which are of primary and paramount
importance to every resident on Bailick
Road are undertaken.
13
1. If the development proceeds IFI would 1. Cork County Council will engage with
ask there is no interference with, IFI in the detailed design of the scheme to
Michael bridging, draining, or culverting of with seek approval for the items raised in this
McPartland, the adjoining rivers or any watercourse, submission.
its banks or bankside vegetation to
Inland facilitate this development without the
Fisheries prior approval of IFI. More specifically
IFI would ask that the proposed
Ireland pedestrian bridge over the Dungourney
River be of a span nature not requiring
instream works. IFI would ask that design
details for the bridge be forwarded when
available.
26You can also read
